首页 > 最新文献

Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Furcate umbilical cord insertion with a bilobed placenta identified on prenatal ultrasonography 分叉脐带插入与双叶胎盘鉴定产前超声检查
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-03-17 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12293
Megan Smith, Bethany McCullum

A furcate cord insertion is a rare finding, which increases the risk of adverse fetal outcomes. There are few reports of prenatal detection in the literature. We present a case of prenatally detected furcate cord insertion, diagnosed at 39 weeks’ gestation and delivered by elective caesarean section. The neonate was small for dates, but this finding was non-specific due to smoking during pregnancy. No other adverse effects to the fetus were found. The placenta required manual removal after attempted cord traction resulted in vessel avulsion at the furcate cord insertion site. Further research is required to develop recommendations for the safe management of this condition.

分叉脐带插入是一种罕见的发现,它增加了不良胎儿结局的风险。在文献中很少有关于产前检测的报道。我们提出一个病例产前检测分叉脐带插入,诊断在妊娠39周,并通过选择性剖腹产分娩。新生儿在日期上很小,但由于怀孕期间吸烟,这一发现是非特异性的。没有发现对胎儿的其他不良影响。在试图牵引脐带导致分叉脐带插入部位的血管撕脱后,需要人工切除胎盘。需要进一步的研究来制定安全管理这种情况的建议。
{"title":"Furcate umbilical cord insertion with a bilobed placenta identified on prenatal ultrasonography","authors":"Megan Smith,&nbsp;Bethany McCullum","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12293","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajum.12293","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A furcate cord insertion is a rare finding, which increases the risk of adverse fetal outcomes. There are few reports of prenatal detection in the literature. We present a case of prenatally detected furcate cord insertion, diagnosed at 39 weeks’ gestation and delivered by elective caesarean section. The neonate was small for dates, but this finding was non-specific due to smoking during pregnancy. No other adverse effects to the fetus were found. The placenta required manual removal after attempted cord traction resulted in vessel avulsion at the furcate cord insertion site. Further research is required to develop recommendations for the safe management of this condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"25 2","pages":"98-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9201199/pdf/AJUM-25-98.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9127306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Describing the learning curve of novices for the diagnosis of paediatric distal forearm fractures using point-of-care ultrasound 描述新手使用即时超声诊断小儿前臂远端骨折的学习曲线
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-03-07 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12291
Peter J. Snelling, Philip Jones, Mark Moore, Peta Gimpel, Rosemary Rogers, Kong Liew, Robert S. Ware, Gerben Keijzers

Purpose

The learning curve of nurse practitioners (NPs) to accurately diagnose paediatric distal forearm fractures using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) was investigated.

Methods

Each NP’s learning curve was calculated as cumulative diagnostic accuracy against a number of scans performed. The curve’s plateau represented the attainment of competency. Secondary outcomes were the comparisons before and after this cut-off of diagnostic accuracy, classification of diagnostic errors, pain scores, duration and preference.

Results

Five NPs performed 201 POCUS studies with diagnostic accuracy plateauing at 90%, providing a ‘cut-off’ point at scan 15. Accuracy of POCUS scanning before and after the fifteenth scan was 81% (95% CI 70%–89%) and 90% (95% CI 84%–94%), respectively, demonstrating 9% improvement (P = 0.07). There was a 10% reduction in image interpretation errors. After fifteen scans, POCUS became faster (mean difference (MD) 2.6 min [95% CI 2.0–3.3], P < 0.001), less painful (MD 0.61 points FPSR scale [95% CI 0.04–1.18], P = 0.04) and more preferred by NPs (63% vs 77%, P = 0.03).

Discussion

The learning curve of POCUS-novice NPs independently scanning paediatric distal forearm injuries plateaued with mean diagnostic accuracy of 90% after 15 scans, suggesting competency was attained at this cut-off, supported by higher accuracy, being faster, less painful and more preferred by NPs. Future training packages in forearm POCUS should further address image interpretation and provide ongoing expert feedback.

Conclusions

The findings from this study suggest that competency in paediatric distal forearm POCUS can be attained by novices after a short training course and approximately 15 scans.

目的探讨执业护士(NPs)使用即时超声(POCUS)准确诊断小儿前臂远端骨折的学习曲线。方法每个NP的学习曲线被计算为相对于多次扫描的累积诊断准确性。曲线的平台表示能力的获得。次要结果是诊断准确性、诊断错误分类、疼痛评分、持续时间和偏好的截止前后比较。结果5名NPs进行了201次POCUS研究,诊断准确率稳定在90%,在扫描15次时提供了一个“截止”点。15次扫描前后的POCUS扫描准确率分别为81% (95% CI 70% ~ 89%)和90% (95% CI 84% ~ 94%),提高了9% (P = 0.07)。图像解释误差降低了10%。15次扫描后,POCUS变得更快(平均差值(MD) 2.6分钟[95% CI 2.0-3.3], P < 0.001),更少痛苦(MD 0.61分FPSR量表[95% CI 0.04 - 1.18], P = 0.04),更受NPs的青睐(63%对77%,P = 0.03)。pocus -新手NPs独立扫描小儿前臂远端损伤的学习曲线在15次扫描后达到稳定水平,平均诊断准确率为90%,表明在这个截止点上获得了能力,支持更高的准确性,更快,更少的痛苦,更受NPs的青睐。未来的前臂POCUS培训包应进一步解决图像解释问题,并提供持续的专家反馈。结论:本研究的结果表明,新手在经过短时间的训练和大约15次扫描后,可以获得小儿前臂远端POCUS的能力。
{"title":"Describing the learning curve of novices for the diagnosis of paediatric distal forearm fractures using point-of-care ultrasound","authors":"Peter J. Snelling,&nbsp;Philip Jones,&nbsp;Mark Moore,&nbsp;Peta Gimpel,&nbsp;Rosemary Rogers,&nbsp;Kong Liew,&nbsp;Robert S. Ware,&nbsp;Gerben Keijzers","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12291","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajum.12291","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The learning curve of nurse practitioners (NPs) to accurately diagnose paediatric distal forearm fractures using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) was investigated.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Each NP’s learning curve was calculated as cumulative diagnostic accuracy against a number of scans performed. The curve’s plateau represented the attainment of competency. Secondary outcomes were the comparisons before and after this cut-off of diagnostic accuracy, classification of diagnostic errors, pain scores, duration and preference.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Five NPs performed 201 POCUS studies with diagnostic accuracy plateauing at 90%, providing a ‘cut-off’ point at scan 15. Accuracy of POCUS scanning before and after the fifteenth scan was 81% (95% CI 70%–89%) and 90% (95% CI 84%–94%), respectively, demonstrating 9% improvement (P = 0.07). There was a 10% reduction in image interpretation errors. After fifteen scans, POCUS became faster (mean difference (MD) 2.6 min [95% CI 2.0–3.3], P &lt; 0.001), less painful (MD 0.61 points FPSR scale [95% CI 0.04–1.18], P = 0.04) and more preferred by NPs (63% vs 77%, P = 0.03).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The learning curve of POCUS-novice NPs independently scanning paediatric distal forearm injuries plateaued with mean diagnostic accuracy of 90% after 15 scans, suggesting competency was attained at this cut-off, supported by higher accuracy, being faster, less painful and more preferred by NPs. Future training packages in forearm POCUS should further address image interpretation and provide ongoing expert feedback.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The findings from this study suggest that competency in paediatric distal forearm POCUS can be attained by novices after a short training course and approximately 15 scans.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"25 2","pages":"66-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9201201/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10841401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Quality and quantification: Is it time to rethink? 质量和量化:是时候重新思考了吗?
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-02-24 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12292
Gillian Whalley

Often, I read in an online ultrasound forum a call to improve workforce shortages and long waiting times by using abbreviated scanning or so-called targeted studies. This is the justified realm of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) where a clinician answers a clinical question at the bedside allowing for fast triage into appropriate care. I am a fan of POCUS: I have seen instances where care was appropriately expedited. I am also a fan of the targeted scan performed by sonographers in situations where patients have had recent examinations and monitoring is all that is needed. But most patients still need a full study.

Complex protocols are efficacious and safe and the hallmark of sonography practice. Sonographer-led protocol-driven examinations, if performed completely, rule out other pathology, while confirming or excluding a differential diagnosis. In addition, while sometimes the differential is all that matters, its exclusion in an abbreviated scan may mean the true pathology is missed because it was not raised as a possibility by the referrer or recognised as a potential alternative diagnosis by the sonographer. When protocols are discarded, mistakes occur, pathology is missed, and additional (and potentially unnecessary) imaging may be performed. Protocol-driven studies are also a supportive approach for sonographers early in their career trajectory but take time to perform. In this issue of AJUM, Deslandes et al1 show that to follow published guidelines for endometriosis diagnosis, a longer appointment time is needed. In essence, a one-slot booking system where every patient gets the same amount of time is not going to work. In the absence of a fee per service model, each sonographer would take as long as needed to get the images they required, but the fee per service model encourages practices to ‘squeeze’ more patients in and therefore does not adequately support full protocol-driven studies. Protocol-driven sonography is ideal. The question, though, is which protocol?

Many professional societies have guidelines for scanning but appropriately stop short of mandating their use. As health professionals, we should make individual decisions about how, and when, it is appropriate to offer an abbreviated scan. Yet, that takes a level of skill and expertise gained through years of experience, and therefore, the protocols and guidelines we use help to maintain quality care for all practitioners and patients. So who decides on these guidelines? Often, they are determined by international societies and are influenced by experts who typically work in well-resourced healthcare systems. Is it time we had local guidelines? Or are they too costly to develop for smaller countries? Also, in our region, should Australia and New Zealand have different guidelines from the rest of the world? We could adopt a shared approach, and that would be ideal given the transient nature of both our patient and professional pop

我经常在一个在线超声论坛上看到有人呼吁通过使用简短扫描或所谓的目标研究来改善劳动力短缺和漫长的等待时间。这是一个合理的点护理超声(POCUS)领域,临床医生在床边回答一个临床问题,允许快速分类到适当的护理。我是POCUS的粉丝:我见过适当加快护理的例子。我也很喜欢超声技师在病人最近做过检查的情况下进行的目标扫描,只需要监测就可以了。但大多数患者仍需要进行全面的研究。复杂的方案是有效和安全的,是超声检查实践的标志。超声引导的方案驱动的检查,如果完全执行,排除其他病理,同时确认或排除鉴别诊断。此外,虽然有时鉴别是最重要的,但在简短扫描中排除它可能意味着错过了真正的病理,因为它没有被转诊者提出作为一种可能性,也没有被超声医师认为是一种潜在的替代诊断。当方案被抛弃时,就会出现错误,遗漏病理,并且可能需要进行额外的(可能是不必要的)成像。协议驱动的研究对于处于职业生涯早期的超声医师来说也是一种支持性的方法,但需要时间来执行。在本期《AJUM》中,Deslandes等人1表明,要遵循已公布的子宫内膜异位症诊断指南,需要更长的预约时间。从本质上讲,每个病人获得相同时间的单时段预约系统是行不通的。在没有按服务收费模式的情况下,每个超声医师将需要尽可能长的时间来获得他们需要的图像,但按服务收费模式鼓励实践“挤压”更多的患者,因此不能充分支持完整的协议驱动研究。协议驱动超声是理想的。但问题是,采用哪种协议?许多专业协会都有扫描的指导方针,但适当地停止强制使用。作为卫生专业人员,我们应该就如何以及何时进行简短扫描做出个人决定。然而,这需要通过多年的经验获得一定水平的技能和专业知识,因此,我们使用的协议和指南有助于为所有从业人员和患者保持高质量的护理。那么谁来决定这些指导方针呢?通常,它们是由国际社会决定的,并受到通常在资源充足的卫生保健系统工作的专家的影响。是时候制定当地指南了吗?或者对于较小的国家来说,它们的开发成本太高了?此外,在我们的地区,澳大利亚和新西兰是否应该有与世界其他地区不同的指导方针?我们可以采用一种共享的方法,考虑到我们的病人和专业人员的短暂性,这将是理想的。如果我们共享相同的协议,我们应该使用相同的正常参考值吗?简单的答案是肯定的,而正确的答案可能是否定的。在本期《美国医学会杂志》中,Dry等人2评估了不同的胎儿生长图表,并表明确实如此。根据使用的图表不同,胎儿生长异常的百分比也不同。也许不足为奇的是,从西澳大利亚人口发展而来的图表在适用于西澳大利亚人口时效果最好。此外,尽管这可能并不令人惊讶,但这是一项重要的研究,因为开发任何参考图表或参考值都需要衍生队列和验证队列。因此,对这些图表进行当代验证是必要和有用的。事实上,世界卫生组织(WHO)呼吁在当地进行验证当人口相对同质时,在一个种族群体中编制的图表在很大程度上适用于具有类似同质种族的其他国家。我们的人口越来越不同质。在几乎所有的超声波测量中,体型较大的人的测量值也较大,但还不止于此。身高和体重相似的非肥胖个体,其正常身体组成可能因种族而有很大差异因此,病理或疾病的定义受到衍生参考测量和应用参考测量的队列的影响。本质上,它们应该是相似的。这种情况很少发生。我们必须做得更好。指导扫描的协议是非常有用的,但它们应该是本地化的,并纳入当地的参考值。此外,实践需要认识到全面和仔细检查的价值。这是病人应得的。
{"title":"Quality and quantification: Is it time to rethink?","authors":"Gillian Whalley","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12292","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajum.12292","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Often, I read in an online ultrasound forum a call to improve workforce shortages and long waiting times by using abbreviated scanning or so-called targeted studies. This is the justified realm of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) where a clinician answers a clinical question at the bedside allowing for fast triage into appropriate care. I am a fan of POCUS: I have seen instances where care was appropriately expedited. I am also a fan of the targeted scan performed by sonographers in situations where patients have had recent examinations and monitoring is all that is needed. But most patients still need a full study.</p><p>Complex protocols are efficacious and safe and the hallmark of sonography practice. Sonographer-led protocol-driven examinations, if performed completely, rule out other pathology, while confirming or excluding a differential diagnosis. In addition, while sometimes the differential is all that matters, its exclusion in an abbreviated scan may mean the true pathology is missed because it was not raised as a possibility by the referrer or recognised as a potential alternative diagnosis by the sonographer. When protocols are discarded, mistakes occur, pathology is missed, and additional (and potentially unnecessary) imaging may be performed. Protocol-driven studies are also a supportive approach for sonographers early in their career trajectory but take time to perform. In this issue of AJUM, Deslandes <i>et al</i><span><sup>1</sup></span> show that to follow published guidelines for endometriosis diagnosis, a longer appointment time is needed. In essence, a one-slot booking system where every patient gets the same amount of time is not going to work. In the absence of a fee per service model, each sonographer would take as long as needed to get the images they required, but the fee per service model encourages practices to ‘squeeze’ more patients in and therefore does not adequately support full protocol-driven studies. Protocol-driven sonography is ideal. The question, though, is which protocol?</p><p>Many professional societies have guidelines for scanning but appropriately stop short of mandating their use. As health professionals, we should make individual decisions about how, and when, it is appropriate to offer an abbreviated scan. Yet, that takes a level of skill and expertise gained through years of experience, and therefore, the protocols and guidelines we use help to maintain quality care for all practitioners and patients. So who decides on these guidelines? Often, they are determined by international societies and are influenced by experts who typically work in well-resourced healthcare systems. Is it time we had local guidelines? Or are they too costly to develop for smaller countries? Also, in our region, should Australia and New Zealand have different guidelines from the rest of the world? We could adopt a shared approach, and that would be ideal given the transient nature of both our patient and professional pop","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"3-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8873618/pdf/AJUM-25-3.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10766598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A comparison of four fetal biometry growth charts within an Australian obstetric population 澳大利亚产科人群中四个胎儿生物测量生长图表的比较
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-02-24 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12290
Candice Dry, Michelle K. Pedretti, Elizabeth Nathan, Jan E. Dickinson

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the applicability of four existing fetal growth charts to a local tertiary hospital obstetric population.

Method

Four existing fetal growth charts (the Raine study reference charts, INTERGROWTH-21st charts, World Health Organization (WHO) fetal growth study charts and Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (ASUM) endorsed Campbell Westerway charts were compared using data from 11651 singleton pregnancy ultrasound scans at King Edward Memorial Hospital (KEMH). The 3rd, 10th, 50th 90th and 97th percentile curves for abdominal circumference (AC) biometry for the KEMH data were calculated and the four primary correlation parameters from fitted 3rd order polynomials (a, b, c and d) were used to generate like-for-like comparisons for all charts.

Results

The overall comparisons showed a significant variation with different growth charts, giving different percentiles for the same fetal AC measurement. INTERGROWTH-21st percentile curves tended to fall below those of other charts for AC measurements. Both the Raine Study charts and ASUM charts were the charts of closest overall fit to the local data.

Conclusion

Our data show the Raine Study charts are the most appropriate for our population compared with the other three charts assessed suggesting the ‘one size fits all’ model may not be appropriate. However, additional analysis of biometry measurements, primarily AC, is needed to address the deficiency of data at 14-18 weeks gestation which exists for the Raine Study data.

A reasonable alternative may be to adopt the WHO charts with local calibration (including the 14 - 18 week gestation period).

目的本研究的目的是探讨四种现有的胎儿生长图表对当地三级医院产科人口的适用性。方法采用爱德华国王纪念医院(King Edward Memorial Hospital, KEMH) 11651例单胎妊娠超声扫描数据,比较现有的四种胎儿生长图(Raine研究参考图、intergrowth -21图、世界卫生组织(WHO)胎儿生长研究图和澳大利亚超声医学学会(ASUM)认可的Campbell Westerway图)。计算KEMH数据的腹围(AC)生物计量学的第3、第10、第50、第90和第97百分位曲线,并使用拟合三阶多项式(a、b、c和d)的四个主要相关参数对所有图表进行相似比较。结果在不同的生长图上,总体比较差异显著,相同的胎儿AC测量值有不同的百分位数。intergrowth -21百分位曲线趋向于低于AC测量的其他图表。雷恩研究图和ASUM图都是最接近当地数据的总体拟合图。结论:我们的数据显示,雷恩研究图表最适合我们的人群,而其他三个评估图表表明,“一刀切”模型可能不合适。然而,需要对生物计量测量进行额外的分析,主要是AC,以解决雷恩研究数据中存在的14-18周妊娠数据的不足。一个合理的替代方案可能是采用当地校准的世卫组织图表(包括14 - 18周妊娠期)。
{"title":"A comparison of four fetal biometry growth charts within an Australian obstetric population","authors":"Candice Dry,&nbsp;Michelle K. Pedretti,&nbsp;Elizabeth Nathan,&nbsp;Jan E. Dickinson","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12290","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajum.12290","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The aim of this study was to investigate the applicability of four existing fetal growth charts to a local tertiary hospital obstetric population.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Four existing fetal growth charts (the Raine study reference charts, INTERGROWTH-21st charts, World Health Organization (WHO) fetal growth study charts and Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (ASUM) endorsed Campbell Westerway charts were compared using data from 11651 singleton pregnancy ultrasound scans at King Edward Memorial Hospital (KEMH). The 3rd, 10th, 50th 90th and 97th percentile curves for abdominal circumference (AC) biometry for the KEMH data were calculated and the four primary correlation parameters from fitted 3rd order polynomials (a, b, c and d) were used to generate like-for-like comparisons for all charts.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The overall comparisons showed a significant variation with different growth charts, giving different percentiles for the same fetal AC measurement. INTERGROWTH-21st percentile curves tended to fall below those of other charts for AC measurements. Both the Raine Study charts and ASUM charts were the charts of closest overall fit to the local data.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our data show the Raine Study charts are the most appropriate for our population compared with the other three charts assessed suggesting the ‘one size fits all’ model may not be appropriate. However, additional analysis of biometry measurements, primarily AC, is needed to address the deficiency of data at 14-18 weeks gestation which exists for the Raine Study data.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A reasonable alternative may be to adopt the WHO charts with local calibration (including the 14 - 18 week gestation period).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"5-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8873619/pdf/AJUM-25-5.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10759269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Systematic review of intra-operative duplex scanning during renal transplantation 肾移植术中双相扫描的系统回顾
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-02-09 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12289
Linda Thebridge, Charles Fisher, Vikram Puttaswamy, Carol Pollock, Jillian Clarke

Introduction

A systematic review of the value of intra-operative duplex scanning during renal transplantation was undertaken.

Methods

Studies assessing intra-operative renal cortical flow in the arcuate vessels with outcomes of ultrasound directed interventions during the initial procedure, delayed graft function, post-operative resistive indices, graft losses and early returns to theatre for graft hypoperfusion were reviewed. PROSPERO registration: (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020203873).

Results

Literature searching identified 2069 articles for screening, with 131 reviewed and 12 selected for analysis comprising 5 individual case reports, one case series of 11 patients and 6 non-randomised controlled trials. Studies with similar methodologies were pooled because of the low number of studies and outcomes. Outcomes of interest were not reported for all patients. Intra-operative interventions comprising graft repositioning in 18 (16%) and vascular revision in 2 (2%) were performed in 115 patients undergoing intra-operative scans. There were no graft losses or returns to theatre for graft hypoperfusion (0 of 108 cases) compared to 7 of 71 (10%) without intraoperative scanning (P = 0.003). Three of 8 (38%) patients with high intra-operative resistive indices (RIs) were returned to theatre for hypoperfusion compared to 1 of 110 (1%) patients with normal resistive indices (P = <0.001). Ten of 13 (77%) patients with high RIs had delayed graft function compared to 10 of 40 (25%) with normal RIs (P = 0.001).

Conclusion

Despite the absence of randomised controlled trials, and heterogeneous small studies, adverse outcomes were reduced with intra-operative scanning. High intraoperative RIs were predictive of both delayed graft function and return to theatre for hypoperfusion.

本文对肾移植术中双相扫描的应用价值进行了系统回顾。方法回顾了术前超声引导干预、移植物延迟功能、术后阻力指数、移植物损失和早期因移植物灌注不足返回手术室的结果,评估术中肾弓状血管皮质血流的研究。普洛斯彼罗注册:(https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020203873)。结果文献检索共筛选2069篇文章,其中131篇被审查,12篇被选择进行分析,包括5篇个案报告、1个病例系列(11例患者)和6项非随机对照试验。由于研究数量和结果较少,采用类似方法的研究被合并。没有报道所有患者的相关结果。术中干预包括移植物复位18例(16%)和血管修复2例(2%),对115例接受术中扫描的患者进行了手术。108例移植物灌注不足患者无移植物丢失或返院(0 / 108),而无需术中扫描的71例患者中有7例(10%)无移植物丢失或返院(P = 0.003)。8例术中阻力指数(RIs)高的患者中有3例(38%)因低灌注而返回手术室,而110例阻力指数正常的患者中有1例(1%)因低灌注而返回手术室(P = <0.001)。13例高RIs患者中有10例(77%)移植物功能延迟,而40例正常RIs患者中有10例(25%)移植物功能延迟(P = 0.001)。结论:尽管缺乏随机对照试验和异质小型研究,术中扫描减少了不良后果。术中高RIs可预测移植物功能延迟和因灌注不足而返回手术室。
{"title":"Systematic review of intra-operative duplex scanning during renal transplantation","authors":"Linda Thebridge,&nbsp;Charles Fisher,&nbsp;Vikram Puttaswamy,&nbsp;Carol Pollock,&nbsp;Jillian Clarke","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12289","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajum.12289","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A systematic review of the value of intra-operative duplex scanning during renal transplantation was undertaken.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Studies assessing intra-operative renal cortical flow in the arcuate vessels with outcomes of ultrasound directed interventions during the initial procedure, delayed graft function, post-operative resistive indices, graft losses and early returns to theatre for graft hypoperfusion were reviewed. PROSPERO registration: (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020203873).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Literature searching identified 2069 articles for screening, with 131 reviewed and 12 selected for analysis comprising 5 individual case reports, one case series of 11 patients and 6 non-randomised controlled trials. Studies with similar methodologies were pooled because of the low number of studies and outcomes. Outcomes of interest were not reported for all patients. Intra-operative interventions comprising graft repositioning in 18 (16%) and vascular revision in 2 (2%) were performed in 115 patients undergoing intra-operative scans. There were no graft losses or returns to theatre for graft hypoperfusion (0 of 108 cases) compared to 7 of 71 (10%) without intraoperative scanning (P = 0.003). Three of 8 (38%) patients with high intra-operative resistive indices (RIs) were returned to theatre for hypoperfusion compared to 1 of 110 (1%) patients with normal resistive indices (P = &lt;0.001). Ten of 13 (77%) patients with high RIs had delayed graft function compared to 10 of 40 (25%) with normal RIs (P = 0.001).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Despite the absence of randomised controlled trials, and heterogeneous small studies, adverse outcomes were reduced with intra-operative scanning. High intraoperative RIs were predictive of both delayed graft function and return to theatre for hypoperfusion.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"42-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8873620/pdf/AJUM-25-42.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10737841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
How long does a transvaginal ultrasound examination for endometriosis take in comparison to a routine transvaginal ultrasound examination? 子宫内膜异位症的阴道超声检查与常规阴道超声检查相比需要多长时间?
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-05 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12288
Alison Deslandes, Nayana Parange, Jessie T. Childs, Brooke Osborne, Catrina Panuccio, Anthea Croft, Eva Bezak

Introduction

This study aimed to determine the additional time needed to perform an endometriosis transvaginal ultrasound (eTVUS) compared to routine transvaginal ultrasound (rTVUS).

Methods

A retrospective case–control study was performed. The study group included 199 eTVUS performed between September 2019 and September 2020. The control group comprised 105 consecutive rTVUS studies performed in the same time period. The time stamps on the ultrasound images of all cases in both groups were reviewed to determine the time taken to perform each study. Mean, median, minimum and maximum scan times for both groups were calculated as was percentage difference between scan times. A two-tailed, unpaired t-test of the normalised data and a Mann–Whitney U test assessing time difference of scans between two groups were performed with P value <0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

Performing eTVUS took significantly longer than rTVUS with increases in the mean (8.4 vs 13.8 min, 64%), median (7 vs 12 min, 71%), minimum (4 vs 7 min, 75%) and maximum (19 vs 42 min, 121%) scan times. The Mann–Whitney U test indicated a statistically significant difference in the median scan times (5.0, CI 4.0–6.0), P < 0.001. An independent t-test of the normalised data revealed a significantly larger mean scan time for eTVUS than rTVUS, Mean = 9.05 95%CI [13.17–4.94], t(302) = 4.327, P < 0.001. R2 = 0.583.

Conclusion

Endometriosis transvaginal ultrasound added an average 5.4 min to rTVUS, which is statistically significant. For ultrasound departments wanting to offer this technique, doubling the scan time allocated to perform a transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) is suggested.

本研究旨在确定子宫内膜异位症经阴道超声(eTVUS)与常规经阴道超声(rTVUS)相比所需的额外时间。方法采用回顾性病例对照研究。该研究组包括2019年9月至2020年9月期间进行的199次eTVUS。对照组包括在同一时间段内进行的105个连续的rTVUS研究。回顾两组所有病例的超声图像上的时间戳,以确定进行每项研究所需的时间。两组的平均、中位数、最小和最大扫描时间以扫描时间之间的百分比差异计算。对归一化数据进行双尾非配对t检验,对两组扫描时间差异进行Mann-Whitney U检验,P值<0.05认为具有统计学意义。结果eTVUS的平均扫描时间(8.4 vs 13.8 min, 64%)、中位扫描时间(7 vs 12 min, 71%)、最小扫描时间(4 vs 7 min, 75%)和最大扫描时间(19 vs 42 min, 121%)明显长于rTVUS。Mann-Whitney U检验显示中位扫描时间差异有统计学意义(5.0,CI 4.0-6.0), P < 0.001。标准化数据的独立t检验显示,eTVUS的平均扫描时间明显大于rTVUS, mean = 9.05 95%CI [13.17-4.94], t(302) = 4.327, P <0.001. R2 = 0.583。结论子宫内膜异位症经阴道超声检查平均增加rTVUS 5.4 min,差异有统计学意义。对于想要提供这种技术的超声部门,建议将分配给执行阴道超声(TVUS)的扫描时间加倍。
{"title":"How long does a transvaginal ultrasound examination for endometriosis take in comparison to a routine transvaginal ultrasound examination?","authors":"Alison Deslandes,&nbsp;Nayana Parange,&nbsp;Jessie T. Childs,&nbsp;Brooke Osborne,&nbsp;Catrina Panuccio,&nbsp;Anthea Croft,&nbsp;Eva Bezak","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12288","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajum.12288","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study aimed to determine the additional time needed to perform an endometriosis transvaginal ultrasound (eTVUS) compared to routine transvaginal ultrasound (rTVUS).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A retrospective case–control study was performed. The study group included 199 eTVUS performed between September 2019 and September 2020. The control group comprised 105 consecutive rTVUS studies performed in the same time period. The time stamps on the ultrasound images of all cases in both groups were reviewed to determine the time taken to perform each study. Mean, median, minimum and maximum scan times for both groups were calculated as was percentage difference between scan times. A two-tailed, unpaired t-test of the normalised data and a Mann–Whitney U test assessing time difference of scans between two groups were performed with P value &lt;0.05 considered statistically significant.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Performing eTVUS took significantly longer than rTVUS with increases in the mean (8.4 vs 13.8 min, 64%), median (7 vs 12 min, 71%), minimum (4 vs 7 min, 75%) and maximum (19 vs 42 min, 121%) scan times. The Mann–Whitney U test indicated a statistically significant difference in the median scan times (5.0, CI 4.0–6.0), P &lt; 0.001. An independent t-test of the normalised data revealed a significantly larger mean scan time for eTVUS than rTVUS, Mean = 9.05 95%CI [13.17–4.94], t(302) = 4.327, P &lt; 0.001. <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.583.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Endometriosis transvaginal ultrasound added an average 5.4 min to rTVUS, which is statistically significant. For ultrasound departments wanting to offer this technique, doubling the scan time allocated to perform a transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) is suggested.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"20-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajum.12288","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50807765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Collaboration in the time of COVID COVID时期的协作
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-11-14 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12287
Gillian A. Whalley

These are different and difficult times. Throughout 2020 and 2021, we have been planning for the 50th celebration conference for ASUM. It should have been a time for us to meet collegially, share knowledge and practical tips, and discuss our latest research findings with our colleagues. Fortunately, we have adapted to online learning and we have learned to communicate in a virtual way. Never before has collegiality been more important. We can increase our knowledge from webinars, reading journals online and attending virtual conferences. But the thing many of us miss the most about conference attendance is meeting old colleagues; forging new professional relationships; and building multi-centre research collaborations. As a professional society, ASUM is well positioned to support its members and offers us a place to grow the ultrasound community. In this issue of AJUM, we include three papers that discuss ultrasound practice across institutions.

Firstly, Manivel et al.1 present the results of a survey that invited emergency department staff across Australia and New Zealand to self-evaluate their preparedness to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic. They found a general lack of preparedness and in particular challenges with infection control. It is likely that patients will continue to arrive at hospitals with both symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19 for the foreseeable future as both countries grapple with outbreaks of the delta variant and the desire to allow citizens to move around and between cities, states and countries. The emergency department staff may be the first they encounter, so having adequate preparation at that stage is critical.

Next, Bennett et al.2 report on their second workforce survey of surgeon-performed ultrasound use amongst registered members of the Breast Surgeons of Australia and New Zealand Society (BreastSurgANZ). They conclude that ‘an ultrasound training curriculum as part of the BreastSurgANZ postfellowship training programme is a necessary imperative’. Interestingly, their respondents were divided as to whether this training should be offered by the BreastSurgANZ (52%) or through a certificate of clinician-performed ultrasound (CCPU) programme (31%), but 22% of their respondents reported completing a CCPU programme versus just 10% in 2010 when their initial survey was undertaken. At the same time, breast ultrasound training is increasingly being offered to advanced trainees. Although this survey primarily informs the future provision of surgeon-led ultrasound, there are important parallels with other specialities. Increasingly, medical colleges are requiring trainees to learn bedside ultrasound. The landscape for teaching clinician-performed ultrasound has changed enormously and will continue to do so. Maintaining standards, providing appropriate training and developing supportive collegial relationships are important steps for the entire ultra

这是一个不同的艰难时期。2020年和2021年,我们正在筹备第50届亚欧会议庆祝大会。这应该是我们一起聚会、分享知识和实用技巧、与同事讨论最新研究成果的时间。幸运的是,我们已经适应了在线学习,我们已经学会了用虚拟的方式交流。同僚合作从未像现在这样重要。我们可以通过网络研讨会、在线阅读期刊和参加虚拟会议来增加知识。但很多人在参加会议时最怀念的是与老同事见面;建立新的职业关系;建立多中心研究合作。作为一个专业协会,ASUM很好地支持其成员,并为我们提供了一个发展超声社区的地方。在本期《美国医学会会刊》中,我们收录了三篇讨论跨机构超声实践的论文。首先,Manivel等人1介绍了一项调查的结果,该调查邀请澳大利亚和新西兰的急诊科工作人员自我评估他们应对COVID-19大流行的准备情况。他们发现普遍缺乏准备,特别是在感染控制方面面临挑战。在可预见的未来,有症状和无症状的COVID-19患者很可能会继续抵达医院,因为这两个国家都在努力应对delta变体的爆发,以及允许公民在城市、州和国家之间流动的愿望。急救部门的工作人员可能是他们第一个遇到的人,所以在这一阶段做好充分的准备是至关重要的。接下来,Bennett等人2报告了他们在澳大利亚和新西兰乳房外科医生协会(BreastSurgANZ)注册会员中进行的第二次外科医生超声使用劳动力调查。他们得出结论:“作为breastsuranz博士后培训项目的一部分,超声波培训课程是必要的。”有趣的是,受访者对于是否应该由BreastSurgANZ(52%)或通过临床医师超声(CCPU)课程证书(31%)提供培训意见不一,但22%的受访者表示完成了CCPU课程,而在2010年进行首次调查时,这一比例仅为10%。与此同时,乳腺超声培训越来越多地提供给高级学员。虽然这项调查主要是告知未来提供外科引导的超声,但与其他专业有重要的相似之处。越来越多的医学院要求受训者学习床边超声。临床超声教学的前景已经发生了巨大的变化,并将继续这样做。维持标准,提供适当的培训和发展支持性的学院关系是整个超声专业的重要步骤。最后,Paoletti等人3进行了一项关于妊娠晚期超声报告实践的调查,包括参考图表的选择和报告方法,并发现不一致有可能误诊胎儿生长异常。他们呼吁澳大利亚和新西兰合作开发可广泛应用的循证图表,三分之一的受访者使用调查的免费文本部分评论需要对妊娠晚期超声和标准化报告中使用的参考图表进行国家标准化。考虑到这是整个澳大拉西亚超声实践的主要组成部分,由于其多样化的种族构成,这一点很重要。在临床实践和研究中,合作对我们许多人来说是很自然的事情,但在部门协议和使用指导方针的决定方面,合作就不那么自然了。其中一些无疑是历史原因,反映了个人偏好或培训情况,但以患者为中心的方法在理想情况下会导致不同提供者得出相同的结论。例如,如果患者跨越州界,不得不更换医疗服务提供者,如果新的医疗服务提供者根据不同的图表得出不同的结论,以确定正常情况,这一定是令人担忧的。如果没有完整的超声报告,并且在患者的信中包含一个简单的描述,例如“心脏扩大”,而没有参考患者的数值或使用的参考值,这也是正确的。如果我们都使用相同的参考值,这将使关怀的转移容易得多。在这样的时代,当我们必须局限于我们自己的地理位置时,我们自己的实践模式很容易在没有仔细检查的情况下被深深嵌入。但让我们不要失去合作精神,利用这段时间进行研究,以增强我们澳大拉西亚的超声实践。
{"title":"Collaboration in the time of COVID","authors":"Gillian A. Whalley","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12287","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajum.12287","url":null,"abstract":"<p>These are different and difficult times. Throughout 2020 and 2021, we have been planning for the 50<sup>th</sup> celebration conference for ASUM. It should have been a time for us to meet collegially, share knowledge and practical tips, and discuss our latest research findings with our colleagues. Fortunately, we have adapted to online learning and we have learned to communicate in a virtual way. Never before has collegiality been more important. We can increase our knowledge from webinars, reading journals online and attending virtual conferences. But the thing many of us miss the most about conference attendance is meeting old colleagues; forging new professional relationships; and building multi-centre research collaborations. As a professional society, ASUM is well positioned to support its members and offers us a place to grow the ultrasound community. In this issue of AJUM, we include three papers that discuss ultrasound practice across institutions.</p><p>Firstly, Manivel et al.<span><sup>1</sup></span> present the results of a survey that invited emergency department staff across Australia and New Zealand to self-evaluate their preparedness to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic. They found a general lack of preparedness and in particular challenges with infection control. It is likely that patients will continue to arrive at hospitals with both symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19 for the foreseeable future as both countries grapple with outbreaks of the delta variant and the desire to allow citizens to move around and between cities, states and countries. The emergency department staff may be the first they encounter, so having adequate preparation at that stage is critical.</p><p>Next, Bennett et al.<span><sup>2</sup></span> report on their second workforce survey of surgeon-performed ultrasound use amongst registered members of the Breast Surgeons of Australia and New Zealand Society (BreastSurgANZ). They conclude that ‘an ultrasound training curriculum as part of the BreastSurgANZ postfellowship training programme is a necessary imperative’. Interestingly, their respondents were divided as to whether this training should be offered by the BreastSurgANZ (52%) or through a certificate of clinician-performed ultrasound (CCPU) programme (31%), but 22% of their respondents reported completing a CCPU programme versus just 10% in 2010 when their initial survey was undertaken. At the same time, breast ultrasound training is increasingly being offered to advanced trainees. Although this survey primarily informs the future provision of surgeon-led ultrasound, there are important parallels with other specialities. Increasingly, medical colleges are requiring trainees to learn bedside ultrasound. The landscape for teaching clinician-performed ultrasound has changed enormously and will continue to do so. Maintaining standards, providing appropriate training and developing supportive collegial relationships are important steps for the entire ultra","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"24 4","pages":"185-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591272/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39710123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Portal Venous Pulsatility Index as a predictor of fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease 门静脉脉搏指数作为非酒精性脂肪肝患者纤维化的预测因子
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-10-18 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12286
Shisheng Lu, Robyn Archard, Linda Mcleod, Angus Banh, Danny Con, Zaid Ardalan, Numan Kutaiba

Introduction

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a growing public health issue. Non-invasive methods to assess the fibrosis stage are limited, and biopsy remains the gold standard. The objective of our study was to assess whether the portal venous pulsatility index (VPI) can be used as a predictor of high-risk NAFLD at a tertiary referral centre for liver transplantation.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with biopsy-proved NAFLD who had undergone a liver ultrasound scan within 1 year of biopsy at our centre from 2011 to 2019.

Results

We did not find a significant correlation between the VPI and the NAFLD risk category or correlation between the VPI and degree of steatosis (P > 0.05 for both).

Conclusion

Since VPI can be easily obtained on routine liver ultrasound and since other studies do report a positive association with significant fibrosis, more studies are needed before it can be recommended or not in risk-stratifying NAFLD patients into high- vs. low-risk NAFLD.

非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题。评估纤维化分期的非侵入性方法有限,活检仍然是金标准。本研究的目的是评估门静脉搏动指数(VPI)是否可以作为肝移植三级转诊中心高危NAFLD的预测指标。方法回顾性分析2011年至2019年在本中心活检1年内接受肝脏超声扫描的活检证实的NAFLD患者。结果我们没有发现VPI与NAFLD危险类别或VPI与脂肪变性程度之间的相关性(P > 0.05)。由于VPI可以很容易地通过常规肝脏超声获得,并且其他研究确实报道了VPI与显著纤维化的正相关,因此在将NAFLD患者分为高风险和低风险之前,需要更多的研究来推荐或不推荐VPI。
{"title":"Portal Venous Pulsatility Index as a predictor of fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease","authors":"Shisheng Lu,&nbsp;Robyn Archard,&nbsp;Linda Mcleod,&nbsp;Angus Banh,&nbsp;Danny Con,&nbsp;Zaid Ardalan,&nbsp;Numan Kutaiba","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12286","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajum.12286","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a growing public health issue. Non-invasive methods to assess the fibrosis stage are limited, and biopsy remains the gold standard. The objective of our study was to assess whether the portal venous pulsatility index (VPI) can be used as a predictor of high-risk NAFLD at a tertiary referral centre for liver transplantation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We retrospectively reviewed patients with biopsy-proved NAFLD who had undergone a liver ultrasound scan within 1 year of biopsy at our centre from 2011 to 2019.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We did not find a significant correlation between the VPI and the NAFLD risk category or correlation between the VPI and degree of steatosis (P &gt; 0.05 for both).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Since VPI can be easily obtained on routine liver ultrasound and since other studies do report a positive association with significant fibrosis, more studies are needed before it can be recommended or not in risk-stratifying NAFLD patients into high- vs. low-risk NAFLD.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"36-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajum.12286","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41495908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fetal dural sinus malformation: A case report and discussion of the literature 胎儿硬脑膜窦畸形1例报告及文献讨论
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-10-05 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12285
Jacqueline Jones, James Christie, Sarah Woodbury, Karen Mizia

Introduction

Fetal dural sinus malformation is a rare but important finding during pregnancy as it has the potential for significant complications.

Methods

Here we present a case of fetal dural sinus malformation and review the current literature relevant to this condition.

Results

We present the case of a 33-year-old woman who had fetal dural sinus malformation containing thrombus diagnosed at morphology ultrasound and confirmed on fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Serial ultrasounds demonstrated the sinus to reduce significantly in size over the course of the pregnancy. The woman delivered a healthy, term baby and there was no evidence of any neurological compromise in the early neonatal period.

Discussion

This case is in keeping with a recent systematic review, which identified 78 previous cases of fetal dural sinus thrombosis and reported good outcomes in most cases.

Conclusion

It therefore appears reasonable, in most cases of isolated dural sinus malformation, to monitor the progress of the lesion and continue managing the pregnancy as usual.

胎儿硬脑膜窦畸形是一种罕见但重要的发现,在怀孕期间,因为它有潜在的显著并发症。方法本文报告1例胎儿硬脑膜窦畸形,并回顾相关文献。结果我们提出一个病例33岁的妇女谁有胎儿硬脑膜窦畸形含血栓诊断超声形态和胎儿磁共振成像(MRI)证实。连续超声显示窦在怀孕过程中明显缩小。这名妇女生下了一个健康的足月婴儿,在新生儿早期没有任何神经损伤的迹象。本病例与最近的一项系统综述一致,该综述确定了78例胎儿硬脑膜窦血栓形成,并报告了大多数病例的良好预后。结论孤立性硬脑膜窦畸形多数病例应监测病变进展,继续正常妊娠管理。
{"title":"Fetal dural sinus malformation: A case report and discussion of the literature","authors":"Jacqueline Jones,&nbsp;James Christie,&nbsp;Sarah Woodbury,&nbsp;Karen Mizia","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12285","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajum.12285","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Fetal dural sinus malformation is a rare but important finding during pregnancy as it has the potential for significant complications.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Here we present a case of fetal dural sinus malformation and review the current literature relevant to this condition.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We present the case of a 33-year-old woman who had fetal dural sinus malformation containing thrombus diagnosed at morphology ultrasound and confirmed on fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Serial ultrasounds demonstrated the sinus to reduce significantly in size over the course of the pregnancy. The woman delivered a healthy, term baby and there was no evidence of any neurological compromise in the early neonatal period.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This case is in keeping with a recent systematic review, which identified 78 previous cases of fetal dural sinus thrombosis and reported good outcomes in most cases.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>It therefore appears reasonable, in most cases of isolated dural sinus malformation, to monitor the progress of the lesion and continue managing the pregnancy as usual.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"24 4","pages":"249-252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591274/pdf/AJUM-24-249.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39711564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The growth rates of solitary gallbladder polyps compared to multi-polyps: A quantitative analysis 单发胆囊息肉与多发胆囊息肉生长速度的比较:定量分析
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-09-22 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12284
Raymond Diep, Paul Lombardo, Michal Schneider

Objectives

Several studies suggest solitary gallbladder polyps (GBPs) have an increased malignancy risk compared to multi-polyps. Furthermore, some malignant GBPs possessed faster growth rates compared to benign GBPs. To our knowledge, no study has established a relationship between GBP number and growth rates. Hence, this study aims to: (i) determine whether there is a statistical significance in growth rates between solitary GBPs versus multi-polyps; (ii) determine, in a four-year period, the proportion of GBPs in this study’s total cohort that exhibit growth compared to previous studies.

Methods

A retrospective, quantitative, cohort study was implemented utilising 100 consecutive patient records from three private radiology clinics. These were assessed against the eligibility criteria and allocated into the solitary or multi-polyp study group, depending on number of GBPs detected on initial and follow-up ultrasound examinations conducted 6–48 months later. Patient age, GBP sizes, time interval between initial and follow-up ultrasound examinations and GBP growth rates were compared between the study groups utilising Student’s t tests.

Results

No statistically significant difference was found between the study groups according to gender, age, GBP size and time between ultrasound examinations. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between the growth rates of solitary and multi-polyp groups (P = 0.77). Most GBPs [92/100 (92%)] grew <2 mm in maximal diameter, while 8/100 (8%) of GBPs grew ≥2 mm in maximal diameter at follow-up.

Conclusions

The large majority of GBPs maintained size stability at follow-up. On average, solitary GBPs did not grow faster than multi-polyps, although further research is recommended to reinforce this.

几项研究表明,与多发胆囊息肉相比,单发胆囊息肉(GBPs)具有更高的恶性风险。此外,与良性GBPs相比,一些恶性GBPs具有更快的生长速度。据我们所知,没有研究建立了英镑数量和增长率之间的关系。因此,本研究旨在:(i)确定单独的GBPs与多息肉之间的生长速度是否具有统计学意义;(ii)确定在四年期间,本研究总队列中与以往研究相比表现出增长的GBPs比例。方法采用回顾性、定量、队列研究,利用3家私人放射诊所的100例连续患者记录。根据6-48个月后进行的初始和随访超声检查中检测到的GBPs数量,根据资格标准对这些患者进行评估,并将其分配到单发或多发息肉研究组。使用学生t检验比较患者年龄、GBP大小、初始和随访超声检查之间的时间间隔以及GBP增长率。结果各组间性别、年龄、GBP大小、超声检查间隔时间差异无统计学意义。孤立息肉组与多息肉组的生长速率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.77)。大多数GBPs[92/100(92%)]最大直径增长了2 mm,而8/100(8%)的GBPs最大直径增长≥2 mm。结论绝大多数GBPs在随访中保持大小稳定。平均而言,单独的GBPs并不比多息肉生长得快,尽管建议进一步研究来加强这一点。
{"title":"The growth rates of solitary gallbladder polyps compared to multi-polyps: A quantitative analysis","authors":"Raymond Diep,&nbsp;Paul Lombardo,&nbsp;Michal Schneider","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12284","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajum.12284","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Several studies suggest solitary gallbladder polyps (GBPs) have an increased malignancy risk compared to multi-polyps. Furthermore, some malignant GBPs possessed faster growth rates compared to benign GBPs. To our knowledge, no study has established a relationship between GBP number and growth rates. Hence, this study aims to: (i) determine whether there is a statistical significance in growth rates between solitary GBPs versus multi-polyps; (ii) determine, in a four-year period, the proportion of GBPs in this study’s total cohort that exhibit growth compared to previous studies.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A retrospective, quantitative, cohort study was implemented utilising 100 consecutive patient records from three private radiology clinics. These were assessed against the eligibility criteria and allocated into the solitary or multi-polyp study group, depending on number of GBPs detected on initial and follow-up ultrasound examinations conducted 6–48 months later. Patient age, GBP sizes, time interval between initial and follow-up ultrasound examinations and GBP growth rates were compared between the study groups utilising Student’s <i>t</i> tests.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>No statistically significant difference was found between the study groups according to gender, age, GBP size and time between ultrasound examinations. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between the growth rates of solitary and multi-polyp groups (P = 0.77). Most GBPs [92/100 (92%)] grew &lt;2 mm in maximal diameter, while 8/100 (8%) of GBPs grew ≥2 mm in maximal diameter at follow-up.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The large majority of GBPs maintained size stability at follow-up. On average, solitary GBPs did not grow faster than multi-polyps, although further research is recommended to reinforce this.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"28-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajum.12284","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46564269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1