首页 > 最新文献

Organic Farming最新文献

英文 中文
Organic Animal Husbandry 有机畜牧业
Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-04657-6_6
A. Kabir
{"title":"Organic Animal Husbandry","authors":"A. Kabir","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-04657-6_6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04657-6_6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36542,"journal":{"name":"Organic Farming","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/978-3-030-04657-6_6","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"51068061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Fertilizer Management Strategies for Enhancing Nutrient Use Efficiency and Sustainable Wheat Production 提高养分利用效率和小麦可持续生产的肥料管理策略
Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-813272-2.00002-1
Q. A. Panhwar, Amanat Ali, U. A. Naher, M. Memon
{"title":"Fertilizer Management Strategies for Enhancing Nutrient Use Efficiency and Sustainable Wheat Production","authors":"Q. A. Panhwar, Amanat Ali, U. A. Naher, M. Memon","doi":"10.1016/B978-0-12-813272-2.00002-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813272-2.00002-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36542,"journal":{"name":"Organic Farming","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/B978-0-12-813272-2.00002-1","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"54177257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31
Index 指数
Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-813272-2.00028-8
{"title":"Index","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-12-813272-2.00028-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-813272-2.00028-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36542,"journal":{"name":"Organic Farming","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/b978-0-12-813272-2.00028-8","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"54177363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Current Status and Soil Biology Impacts of Organic Conservation Tillage in the US Great Plains 美国大平原有机保护性耕作现状及土壤生物学影响
Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-04657-6_2
S. Briar, P. Carr, Greta G. Gramig, F. Menalled, P. Miller
{"title":"Current Status and Soil Biology Impacts of Organic Conservation Tillage in the US Great Plains","authors":"S. Briar, P. Carr, Greta G. Gramig, F. Menalled, P. Miller","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-04657-6_2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04657-6_2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36542,"journal":{"name":"Organic Farming","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/978-3-030-04657-6_2","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"51067938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Fertilizer Management Strategies for Sustainable Rice Production 水稻可持续生产的肥料管理策略
Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-813272-2.00009-4
U. A. Naher, Md. Nayeem Ahmed, M. Sarkar, J. Biswas, Q. A. Panhwar
{"title":"Fertilizer Management Strategies for Sustainable Rice Production","authors":"U. A. Naher, Md. Nayeem Ahmed, M. Sarkar, J. Biswas, Q. A. Panhwar","doi":"10.1016/B978-0-12-813272-2.00009-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813272-2.00009-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36542,"journal":{"name":"Organic Farming","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/B978-0-12-813272-2.00009-4","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"54176895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
Bioenergy Production and Organic Agriculture 生物能源生产与有机农业
Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-813272-2.00012-4
Torsten Siegmeier, B. Blumenstein, D. Möller
{"title":"Bioenergy Production and Organic Agriculture","authors":"Torsten Siegmeier, B. Blumenstein, D. Möller","doi":"10.1016/B978-0-12-813272-2.00012-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813272-2.00012-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36542,"journal":{"name":"Organic Farming","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/B978-0-12-813272-2.00012-4","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"54176957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
A Review of 'Nutrition and Feeding of Organic Poultry 2nd Edition' 《有机家禽营养与饲养(第二版)》综述
Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2018-12-03 DOI: 10.12924/OF2018.04010016
W. Zollitsch
"Nutrition and Feeding of Organic Poultry" is a reference book for producers, advisory personnel, teachers, students and technical experts who are searching for sound information on the basics of nutrition, feed characteristics, practical diet formulation and the impact of nutrition on productivity, health and welfare of organic poultry.
《有机家禽的营养与饲养》是一本为生产者、咨询人员、教师、学生和技术专家寻找有关营养基础、饲料特性、实用日粮配方以及营养对有机家禽生产力、健康和福利的影响的可靠信息的参考书。
{"title":"A Review of 'Nutrition and Feeding of Organic Poultry 2nd Edition'","authors":"W. Zollitsch","doi":"10.12924/OF2018.04010016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12924/OF2018.04010016","url":null,"abstract":"\"Nutrition and Feeding of Organic Poultry\" is a reference book for producers, advisory personnel, teachers, students and technical experts who are searching for sound information on the basics of nutrition, feed characteristics, practical diet formulation and the impact of nutrition on productivity, health and welfare of organic poultry.","PeriodicalId":36542,"journal":{"name":"Organic Farming","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47513873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Labour Use on Organic Farms: A Review of Research since 2000 有机农场的劳动力使用:2000年以来的研究综述
Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2018-06-22 DOI: 10.12924/of2018.04010007
S. Orsini, S. Padel, N. Lampkin
Organic farming is frequently associated with claims of more labour requirements than conventional. However, there is a fragmented knowledge about labour use on organic farms in terms of workload, nature and quality of employment provided. In the context of a growing organic demand and a need for more farmers to convert to reach policy targets set by many EU governments, it seems crucial to understand labour trends on organic farms and to what extent labour requirements may hinder the adoption of the organic methods. This paper presents a review of mainly European literature published since 2000. Studies presenting results by farm type usually indicate higher labour use per hectare on organic than conventional arable farms, whereas similar or lower labour use is reported on organic livestock farms, and the results are mixed for other farm types. We have identified in the existing literature two broad dimensions directly related with labour use, which need to be considered in comparative studies, namely farm structure (including farm type, but also farm size and diversification activities), and technical efficiency. These two broad dimensions give us insights into some more specific factors affecting labour use, and how labour is related with productivity and technical efficiency. Overall it appears that claims that labour requirements represent a concrete obstacle to the adoption of the organic methods need to be treated with caution, and more research is needed to understand the role of labour in farmers’ decision to convert to organic farming. The review of the nature and quality of employment indicates positive health effects related to higher satisfaction and lower exposure to pesticides in organic agriculture as the most important advantages for farm workers. Overall, there is limited research on whether the organic sector provides better opportunities in terms of job prospects, wages and employment of women.
有机农业经常与声称比传统农业需要更多劳动力有关。然而,在工作量、就业性质和质量方面,对有机农场劳动力使用的了解并不完整。在有机需求不断增长以及需要更多农民转变以实现许多欧盟政府设定的政策目标的背景下,了解有机农场的劳动力趋势以及劳动力需求在多大程度上可能阻碍有机方法的采用似乎至关重要。本文主要对2000年以来发表的欧洲文献进行综述。按农场类型提供结果的研究通常表明,有机农场的每公顷劳动力使用量高于传统耕地农场,而有机畜牧场的劳动力使用量相似或较低,其他农场类型的结果参差不齐。我们在现有文献中确定了与劳动力使用直接相关的两个广泛维度,需要在比较研究中加以考虑,即农场结构(包括农场类型,但也包括农场规模和多样化活动)和技术效率。这两个广泛的维度让我们深入了解了影响劳动力使用的一些更具体的因素,以及劳动力如何与生产力和技术效率相关。总的来说,似乎需要谨慎对待劳动力需求是采用有机方法的具体障碍的说法,需要进行更多的研究,以了解劳动力在农民决定转向有机农业中的作用。对就业性质和质量的审查表明,有机农业中较高的满意度和较低的农药暴露量对健康产生了积极影响,这是农场工人最重要的优势。总体而言,关于有机部门是否在妇女的就业前景、工资和就业方面提供了更好的机会的研究有限。
{"title":"Labour Use on Organic Farms: A Review of Research since 2000","authors":"S. Orsini, S. Padel, N. Lampkin","doi":"10.12924/of2018.04010007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12924/of2018.04010007","url":null,"abstract":"Organic farming is frequently associated with claims of more labour requirements than conventional. However, there is a fragmented knowledge about labour use on organic farms in terms of workload, nature and quality of employment provided. In the context of a growing organic demand and a need for more farmers to convert to reach policy targets set by many EU governments, it seems crucial to understand labour trends on organic farms and to what extent labour requirements may hinder the adoption of the organic methods. This paper presents a review of mainly European literature published since 2000. Studies presenting results by farm type usually indicate higher labour use per hectare on organic than conventional arable farms, whereas similar or lower labour use is reported on organic livestock farms, and the results are mixed for other farm types. We have identified in the existing literature two broad dimensions directly related with labour use, which need to be considered in comparative studies, namely farm structure (including farm type, but also farm size and diversification activities), and technical efficiency. These two broad dimensions give us insights into some more specific factors affecting labour use, and how labour is related with productivity and technical efficiency. Overall it appears that claims that labour requirements represent a concrete obstacle to the adoption of the organic methods need to be treated with caution, and more research is needed to understand the role of labour in farmers’ decision to convert to organic farming. The review of the nature and quality of employment indicates positive health effects related to higher satisfaction and lower exposure to pesticides in organic agriculture as the most important advantages for farm workers. Overall, there is limited research on whether the organic sector provides better opportunities in terms of job prospects, wages and employment of women.","PeriodicalId":36542,"journal":{"name":"Organic Farming","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42096245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
Novel Plant Protection Regulation: New Perspectives for Organic Production 新型植物保护法规:有机生产的新视角
Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2018-05-17 DOI: 10.12924/OF2018.04010003
P. Marchand
So called ’active substances’ (A.S.) which are allowed in Organic Production are regularly criticized for different reasons. Previously, although permitted in Organic Farming some substances were not approved under EU general plant protection products (PPP) regulation; therefore they were removed for their toxicity or exhibited characteristics (persistence, broad spectrum). Recent approbations under different new Articles of the EC regulation 1107/2009, gave rise to substances granted without maximum residue limits (MRL). We previously described approved basic substance (Art. 23) as potential candidates for organic farming; here we describe low risk substances (Art. 22) as new implements for substitution of controversial organic biopesticides and consequently as candidates for substitution (Art. 24).
有机生产中允许使用的所谓“活性物质”(A.S.)经常因不同原因受到批评。此前,尽管有机农业允许使用某些物质,但根据欧盟一般植物保护产品(PPP)法规,这些物质未得到批准;因此,它们因其毒性或表现出特征(持久性、广谱性)而被去除。根据欧盟委员会第1107/2009号条例的不同新条款,最近的批准产生了无最大残留限量(MRL)的物质。我们之前曾将已批准的基本物质(第23条)描述为有机农业的潜在候选物质;在这里,我们将低风险物质(第22条)描述为替代有争议的有机生物农药的新工具,从而作为替代品(第24条)。
{"title":"Novel Plant Protection Regulation: New Perspectives for Organic Production","authors":"P. Marchand","doi":"10.12924/OF2018.04010003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12924/OF2018.04010003","url":null,"abstract":"So called ’active substances’ (A.S.) which are allowed in Organic Production are regularly criticized for different reasons. Previously, although permitted in Organic Farming some substances were not approved under EU general plant protection products (PPP) regulation; therefore they were removed for their toxicity or exhibited characteristics (persistence, broad spectrum). Recent approbations under different new Articles of the EC regulation 1107/2009, gave rise to substances granted without maximum residue limits (MRL). We previously described approved basic substance (Art. 23) as potential candidates for organic farming; here we describe low risk substances (Art. 22) as new implements for substitution of controversial organic biopesticides and consequently as candidates for substitution (Art. 24).","PeriodicalId":36542,"journal":{"name":"Organic Farming","volume":"4 1","pages":"3-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49111424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Research into Practice—Promoting Participation, Perseverance and Publications 实践研究——促进参与、坚持和出版
Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2018-05-16 DOI: 10.12924/OF2018.04010001
T. Döring
This year, organic farmers, advisors and researchers in the West of Germany celebrate the 25 th anniversary of the foundation of an organic research and demonstration network. Established to support and improve organic farming systems, the network is funded by the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia and is organized around 30 participating pilot farms called Leitbetriebe (‘leading farms’), with support from the university of Bonn and the Chamber of Agriculture For each of the practice-oriented research topics covered in this network, the typical five-year cycle of research involves a first year of experimental exploration and literature studies. The farmers participating in the pilot farm project discuss and select the topics of priority and review the research plans proposed by the scientists. This is followed by three years of systematic replicated field trials on several farms, and a final year of demonstration and evaluation, where the presentation of results is jointly done by farmers and researchers.
今年,德国西部的有机农民、顾问和研究人员庆祝有机研究和示范网络成立25周年。该网络旨在支持和改善有机农业系统,由北莱茵-威斯特法伦联邦州资助,在波恩大学和农业商会的支持下,组织了大约30个名为Leitbetriebe(“领先农场”)的参与试点农场,典型的五年研究周期包括第一年的实验探索和文献研究。参与试点农场项目的农民讨论并选择优先主题,并审查科学家提出的研究计划。随后,在几个农场进行了三年的系统复制田间试验,并在最后一年进行了演示和评估,由农民和研究人员共同展示结果。
{"title":"Research into Practice—Promoting Participation, Perseverance and Publications","authors":"T. Döring","doi":"10.12924/OF2018.04010001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12924/OF2018.04010001","url":null,"abstract":"This year, organic farmers, advisors and researchers in the West of Germany celebrate the 25 th anniversary of the foundation of an organic research and demonstration network. Established to support and improve organic farming systems, the network is funded by the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia and is organized around 30 participating pilot farms called Leitbetriebe (‘leading farms’), with support from the university of Bonn and the Chamber of Agriculture For each of the practice-oriented research topics covered in this network, the typical five-year cycle of research involves a first year of experimental exploration and literature studies. The farmers participating in the pilot farm project discuss and select the topics of priority and review the research plans proposed by the scientists. This is followed by three years of systematic replicated field trials on several farms, and a final year of demonstration and evaluation, where the presentation of results is jointly done by farmers and researchers.","PeriodicalId":36542,"journal":{"name":"Organic Farming","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46468148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Organic Farming
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1