Hawai''i journal of health & social welfare最新文献

Racial disparities in vision impairment have been reported among Black, Hispanic, and White Americans. However, there is a paucity of research on vision impairment among Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders (NHPIs). The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of, and risk factors for, self-reported visual impairment in NHPI adults in the United States (US). Data from the NHPI and 2014 National Health Interview Surveys were analyzed using sample weights and variance estimates. Prevalence was calculated for vision impairment and blindness for the NHPI and overall US populations. Sociodemographic and clinical risk factors of vision impairment were explored using descriptive statistics, χ² tests, and simple and multiple logistic regression. In total, 2 586 NHPIs and 36 673 individuals in the US were included. The prevalence of vision impairment was 8.8% among NHPIs and 9.1% for the overall US population, and the prevalence of blindness was 0.72% for NHPIs and 0.35% for the overall population. Independent risk factors associated with vision impairment were having a Charlson Comorbidity Index over 1 [OR: 2.89, 95% CI: (1.42-5.88)] and having a family income below $35 000 [OR: 2.03, 95% CI: (1.06-3.89)]. In summary, the rate of blindness is higher among NHPIs than the overall US population, especially for older and unemployed individuals with more comorbidities. Higher comorbidity burden, lower family income, and recent eye care were risk factors for vision impairment. More research is necessary to develop targeted and culturally sensitive interventions to promote NHPI eye health.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection increases the risk of reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Although antiretroviral therapy decreases the progression of LTBI to tuberculosis disease (TBD), persons living with HIV (PLHIV) still have higher risk of TBD compared to the general population. LTBI screening is recommended for all newly diagnosed PLHIV to prevent TBD. However, several studies from low TBD incidence countries have reported sub-optimal implementation of these guidelines. This review aims to assess published studies on adherence to LTBI screening among PLHIV by identifying factors and determinants that affect the implementation of LTBI screening among PLHIV in low TBD incidence countries. Electronic databases were used to search for articles describing the adherence to LTBI screening guidelines. Fourteen studies were included in the final review. Ten studies assessed the frequency of PLHIV getting LTBI screening, and 4 studies assessed the compliance of health care providers in implementing the guidelines. PLHIV who were screened for LTBI ranged from 22.4% to 85%, of which 0.8% to 25.6% had positive results. Only 20% to 57.4% of surveyed physicians implemented the guidelines. Country of birth was an independent predictor of receiving LTBI screening. LTBI screening guidelines are inconsistently performed resulting in missed opportunities for TBD prevention. A comprehensive screening policy involving testing all PLHIV may be the best approach, rather than a targeted approach testing foreign-born individuals only. This will minimize missing domestic cases that can worsen disparity in HIV and tuberculosis infection among minority groups, including Asians, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders.

Concussions are caused by physical trauma to the head, face, or neck and can be sustained while surfing, increasing the risk of drowning. The purpose of this pilot study was to establish a preliminary assessment of concussion knowledge in a group of adult recreational surfers. Using the standardized Concussion Knowledge Index, an anonymous survey was conducted with 55 surfers. The Concussion Knowledge Index and similar statistical measures were used in a previous study of adult soccer players in England. Data from these 2 groups were compared. The preliminary data suggests that the group of adult surfers demonstrate more concussion knowledge than the group of adult soccer players. Further study into surfers' knowledge of concussion with a larger sample size could increase the clinical utility and generalizability of this study.

Prior to the availability of vaccines, kūpuna (older adults) accounted for the majority of COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths. Hawaii's phased vaccine-release plan prioritized kūpuna, but it did not include guidance or strategies for kūpuna to get to mass vaccination sites, for those residing in care and foster homes, or for the homebound. This paper presents findings from statewide efforts to facilitate a quick uptake of vaccines among kūpuna of all ability levels. Researchers interviewed 32 individuals involved in kūpuna vaccination efforts from state and county government agencies, health care organizations, and non-profit organizations. Data on the percentage of kūpuna that initiated and completed the vaccination series by age group and island were obtained from the Hawai'i State Department of Health COVID-19 Dashboard. Overall, kūpuna vaccination efforts across the state were successful. By July 30, 2021, 94% of adults age 65+ were vaccinated, although prevalence varied by county-from 88% on Maui to 98% on Kaua'i. Key barriers included cumbersome online systems for scheduling vaccination appointments, difficulties for some elders in accessing mass vaccination sites, and the need for education and consent forms in multiple languages. Successful strategies included funding coalitions for effective partnerships, establishing county- and language-specific call centers, and supporting translation/interpretation services, mobile and pop-up clinics, and mechanisms for in-home vaccinations. Hawai'i worked hard to facilitate the quick uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among older adults. Funding for coalitions that could identify gaps, coordinate expertise across public and private sectors, and advocate for elders were crucial elements of the state's success.

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused unprecedented disruption in health care systems and may continue to do so. Nurses, the largest contingent of the nation's health care workforce, have borne the brunt of those disruptions, which have caused increased workload and resultant occupational stress. This study identified differences in nurses' occupational stress by practice specialty, time spent caring for patients with COVID-19, and nurses' demographic characteristics. A descriptive cross-sectional online survey of RNs and APRNs (N=328) was conducted at a Level 1 Trauma Center on the island of O'ahu, Hawai'i in September and October of 2021. Participants completed the 57-item Expanded Nursing Stress Scale (ENSS). Nurses reported an average overall stress score of 2.11 out of 4. The ENSS subscales of workload, patients and their families, inadequate preparation, and uncertainty concerning treatment all had higher mean scores than the total scale. Nurses working in perioperative/procedural areas and obstetrics reported lower overall occupational stress scores than nurses in other specialties. Nurses who spent > 50% of their time caring for patients with COVID-19 reported higher overall occupational stress scores than nurses who spent ≤ 50% of their time caring for patients with COVID-19 (F = 8.21, P < .001). Nurses over the age of 50 reported less stress than their younger counterparts (F = 5.75, P = .004). Understanding how occupational stress impacts acute care nurses can aid employers in allocating resources to address the problem, and thus improve workforce retention.

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine was not well adopted in US nursing facilities. Many nursing facilities have since acknowledged its value due to the need for stricter infection control and reduction of exposure risk from face-to-face visits. A quality improvement project was conducted to improve telemedicine protocols in a high-volume post-acute care nursing facility, enhance provider and facility capability for visits, improve attitudes and skills toward telemedicine, and expand patient access to medical care during the pandemic. Process improvement was facilitated through identifying core areas of need and implementing interventions to address them. Project impact was measured by a retrospective pre-post survey of 7 questions to evaluate process improvement, attitudes, skills, and perceptions using a 5-point Likert scale (5=strongly agree, 1=strongly disagree) completed by 22 respondents (8 medical providers and 14 staff). Scores from before and after implementation were compared using paired t-tests. Respondents expressed improvement in perceived value (3.2 vs 4.8), personal skill/efficiency (2.3 vs 4.2), comfort level (2.3 vs 4.5), and scheduling process (2.3 vs 3.9) for telemedicine visits (all P≤.001). Respondents expressed increased awareness of barriers/benefits of telemedicine (2.8 vs 4.7, P<.001) and improved leadership commitment (2.6 vs 4.4, P<.001). The weekly average number of telemedicine visits per respondent increased significantly after protocol implementation (6.5 vs 25.6, P=.002). With support of facility leadership, interdisciplinary team members and engagement of key stakeholders, a telemedicine protocol was implemented in a single, high-volume, post-acute care skilled nursing facility during the COVID-19 pandemic, allowing patients to receive needed care.

The University of Hawai'i at Mānoa (UHM) created a COVID-19 pandemic team to collaborate, plan, and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 across the campus. The purpose of this study was to identify asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic cases of SARS-CoV-2 among unvaccinated UHM residence hall students during 3 distinct intervals (semesters) within the COVID-19 pandemic. Supervised self-administered nasal swab testing samples were collected from unvaccinated UHM residence hall students and sent to a clinical laboratory for COVID-19 RT-PCR testing to detect SARS-CoV-2. Positive cases were contacted and placed in isolation while contact tracing was initiated. The screening program performed 2219 tests on 725 unique persons with the identification of COVID-19 infections in 38 asymptomatic unvaccinated students and an additional 10 cases through contact tracing. A positive correlation existed between the screening program case numbers and the state of Hawai'i 7-day average positive cases as demonstrated with a Pearson coefficient of 0.79 and P<.001. The COVID-19 positivity rate was greater during Spring Semester 2022 compared to both Spring Semester 2021 (P<.001) and Fall Semester 2021 (P <.001). This program served as a component ofa larger strategy to mitigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the UHM campus. Additional benefits of the program included opportunities to increase COVID-19 awareness, enact health policy measures, evolve to meet changing pandemic demands, and maintain a safe UHM campus.

Studies that examine racial disparities in health outcomes often include analyses that account or adjust for baseline differences in co-morbid conditions. Often, these conditions are defined as dichotomous (Yes/No) variables, and few analyses include clinical and/or laboratory data that could allow for more nuanced estimates of disease severity. However, disease severity - not just prevalence - can differ substantially by race and is an underappreciated mechanism for health disparities. Thus, relying on dichotomous disease indicators may not fully describe health disparities. This study explores the effect of substituting continuous clinical and/or laboratory data for dichotomous disease indicators on racial disparities, using data from the Queen's Medical Center's (QMC) cardiac surgery database (a subset of the national Society of Thoracic Surgeon's cardiothoracic surgery database) as an example case. Two logistic regression models predicting in-hospital mortality were constructed: (I) a baseline model including race and dichotomous (Yes/No) indicators of disease (diabetes, heart failure, liver disease, kidney disease), and (II) a more detailed model with continuous laboratory values in place of the dichotomous indicators (eg, including Hemoglobin A1c level rather than just diabetes yes/no). When only dichotomous disease indicators were used in the model, Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander (NHPI) race was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.57[1.29,2.47], P=.04). Yet when the more specific laboratory values were included, NHPI race was no longer associated with in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.67[0.92,2.28], P=.28). Thus, researchers should be thoughtful in their choice of independent variables and understand the potential impact of how clinical measures are operationalized in their research.

Numerous studies have used survey instruments to measure the degree of cultural identity/identification for a racial group to examine how they identify with their heritage or cultural group. However, only a few systematic reviews have summarized the survey instruments for Native Hawaiians, Pacific Islanders, and Filipinos. This systematic review aimed to summarize reliable and validated survey instruments that assessed the cultural identity/identification of Native Hawaiians, Pacific Islanders, and Filipinos in 3 steps: (1) identifying studies that meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria; (2) evaluating the psychometric properties of the instrument with reported validity and reliability test results; and (3) summarizing the selected studies. A search was conducted in PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Health and Psychosocial Instruments databases for published articles related to the cultural identification for the 3 racial groups. Sixteen unique articles met the inclusion/exclusion criteria: 7 for Filipinos, 3 for Native Hawaiians, 1 for Pacific Islanders, 2 for Asian Americans, and 3 for non-specific Indigenous people. Three reviewers assessed the psychometric properties of the 16 articles using the pre-determined criteria and summarized the survey instruments and study outcomes. All the selected articles discussed their survey instrument's validity. This review can serve as a resource for researchers who want to apply a culturally tailored survey instrument for Native Hawaiians, Pacific Islanders, and Filipinos in their research studies.

This article describes recommendations for standardized race data collection developed by the Hawai'i Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander COVID-19 Response, Recovery, and Resilience Team (NHPI 3R Team). These recommendations attempt to address the expressed desires of Native Hawaiians and the diverse Pacific Islander communities in Hawai'i who seek greater visibility in data and research. The Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (NHPI) racial category is 1 of the 5 racial categories listed in the 1997 Statistical Policy Directive #15 issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The OMB directive sets the minimum standard for collection of race data in federal surveys, administrative forms, records, and other data collection. The NHPI 3R Team's recommendation provides a standard for detailed data collection that could improve smaller communities' ability to identify, advocate for, and address their own needs. The article also describes lessons learned through the collaborative and iterative process that was led by members and leaders of NHPI communities impacted by data driven decisions and policies. The NHPI 3R Team focused on expanding and standardizing race data collection as part of their COVID-19 response efforts, but implementation of the recommendations could produce benefits well beyond the pandemic.