Pub Date : 2020-12-29eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0043
Rachel A Locke, Elizabeth P Kwenda, Jeremy Archer, Jeremy Bergamo, Maria Paula Domino, Romano T DeMarco, Christopher E Bayne
Background: Pediatric urolithiasis may coexist with congenital urinary tract abnormalities, complicating conventional methods of stone treatment. Here, we present an effective case of robot-assisted laparoscopy and simultaneous ureteropyeloscopy for the definitive management of pediatric urolithiasis complicated by a congenital ureteral stricture. Case Presentation: A 3-year-old girl presented to clinic with an outside noncontrast CT scan showing two 6-7 mm nonobstructing calculi in a mildly distended upper pole moiety of a duplex left kidney. Ureteral duplication status was unclear. The patient had suffered multiple febrile urinary tract infections throughout her life. Retrograde ureteropyelogram showed a stenotic waist in the upper pole ureter just proximal to the duplex ureteral convergence, and flexible ureteroscopy confirmed a congenital ureteral stricture. Simultaneous robot-assisted laparoscopic and ureteroscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroplasty were offered and performed using a 3-armed robotic approach. The precise location of the stricture was identified robotically with simultaneous left ureteroscopy. A medial 1.5 cm longitudinal ureterotomy was made through the ureteral stricture to facilitate upper moiety ureterorenoscopy. The calculi were visualized in the upper moiety and retrieved in whole using a stone basket. The calculi were passed via the ureterotomy to the robotic instruments intraperitoneally. The longitudinal ureterotomy was closed transversely. A ureteral stent was placed, and indocyanine green was administered intravenously to confirm good perfusion of the ureteroplasty segment via fluorescence imaging. The stent was removed at 4 weeks. Retrograde ureterography and flexible ureteroscopy revealed complete patency of the anastomosis. At 11 months, the upper pole moiety remained decompressed on ultrasonography. The patient has remained off antibiotic prophylaxis without further infection. Conclusion: Robot-assisted approaches can be primary or adjunct tools in the definitive treatment of pediatric urolithiasis with concomitant urinary tract abnormalities.
{"title":"Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic and Ureteroscopic Ureterolithotomy and Ureteroplasty.","authors":"Rachel A Locke, Elizabeth P Kwenda, Jeremy Archer, Jeremy Bergamo, Maria Paula Domino, Romano T DeMarco, Christopher E Bayne","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Pediatric urolithiasis may coexist with congenital urinary tract abnormalities, complicating conventional methods of stone treatment. Here, we present an effective case of robot-assisted laparoscopy and simultaneous ureteropyeloscopy for the definitive management of pediatric urolithiasis complicated by a congenital ureteral stricture. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> A 3-year-old girl presented to clinic with an outside noncontrast CT scan showing two 6-7 mm nonobstructing calculi in a mildly distended upper pole moiety of a duplex left kidney. Ureteral duplication status was unclear. The patient had suffered multiple febrile urinary tract infections throughout her life. Retrograde ureteropyelogram showed a stenotic waist in the upper pole ureter just proximal to the duplex ureteral convergence, and flexible ureteroscopy confirmed a congenital ureteral stricture. Simultaneous robot-assisted laparoscopic and ureteroscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroplasty were offered and performed using a 3-armed robotic approach. The precise location of the stricture was identified robotically with simultaneous left ureteroscopy. A medial 1.5 cm longitudinal ureterotomy was made through the ureteral stricture to facilitate upper moiety ureterorenoscopy. The calculi were visualized in the upper moiety and retrieved in whole using a stone basket. The calculi were passed via the ureterotomy to the robotic instruments intraperitoneally. The longitudinal ureterotomy was closed transversely. A ureteral stent was placed, and indocyanine green was administered intravenously to confirm good perfusion of the ureteroplasty segment via fluorescence imaging. The stent was removed at 4 weeks. Retrograde ureterography and flexible ureteroscopy revealed complete patency of the anastomosis. At 11 months, the upper pole moiety remained decompressed on ultrasonography. The patient has remained off antibiotic prophylaxis without further infection. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Robot-assisted approaches can be primary or adjunct tools in the definitive treatment of pediatric urolithiasis with concomitant urinary tract abnormalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"264-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/cren.2020.0043","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38832363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-09-17eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1089/cren.2019.0132
Andrew Watts, Neil J Kocher, Eric Pauli, Jay D Raman
Background: Rectovesical fistulae (RVF) are uncommon complications of pelvic surgeries and are a potential cause of significant morbidity. RVF are not typically closed endoscopically but rather require reoperative surgery of the lower pelvis with closure of tract, interposition of fat or omentum, and possible permanent bowel diversion. We present a unique case of a rectovesical fistula developing after robotic prostatectomy that was managed by multimodal multistage endoscopic therapy as an alternative to conventional operative repair. Case Presentation: A healthy 78-year-old Caucasian man underwent a robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection for high-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate. The patient's postoperative course was complicated by an unrecognized rectal injury culminating in emergent exploration, abdominal washout, creation of a diverting loop transverse colostomy, and resultant development of a large rectovesical fistula. Given the patient's hostile abdomen and desire for conservative management the fistula was managed through a combined cystoscopic and endoscopic procedure that utilized suturing and clipping to close the fistula. This novel technique was followed by a series of three subsequent endoscopic procedures that enabled us to gradually downsize the fistula over time and ultimately achieve complete closure. The patient's colostomy was eventually reversed with return of bowel continuity. Conclusion: Although uncommon, RVF are significant complications of pelvic surgery. The presence of abdominal/pelvic adhesions from previous surgeries or patient comorbidities can make open surgical repair extremely challenging or impracticable. Therefore, it is important to recognize and consider the use of endoscopic techniques as potential options for closure of rectovesical fistula in certain situations.
{"title":"Endoscopic Closure of a Large Rectovesical Fistula Following Robotic Prostatectomy.","authors":"Andrew Watts, Neil J Kocher, Eric Pauli, Jay D Raman","doi":"10.1089/cren.2019.0132","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2019.0132","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Rectovesical fistulae (RVF) are uncommon complications of pelvic surgeries and are a potential cause of significant morbidity. RVF are not typically closed endoscopically but rather require reoperative surgery of the lower pelvis with closure of tract, interposition of fat or omentum, and possible permanent bowel diversion. We present a unique case of a rectovesical fistula developing after robotic prostatectomy that was managed by multimodal multistage endoscopic therapy as an alternative to conventional operative repair. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> A healthy 78-year-old Caucasian man underwent a robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection for high-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate. The patient's postoperative course was complicated by an unrecognized rectal injury culminating in emergent exploration, abdominal washout, creation of a diverting loop transverse colostomy, and resultant development of a large rectovesical fistula. Given the patient's hostile abdomen and desire for conservative management the fistula was managed through a combined cystoscopic and endoscopic procedure that utilized suturing and clipping to close the fistula. This novel technique was followed by a series of three subsequent endoscopic procedures that enabled us to gradually downsize the fistula over time and ultimately achieve complete closure. The patient's colostomy was eventually reversed with return of bowel continuity. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Although uncommon, RVF are significant complications of pelvic surgery. The presence of abdominal/pelvic adhesions from previous surgeries or patient comorbidities can make open surgical repair extremely challenging or impracticable. Therefore, it is important to recognize and consider the use of endoscopic techniques as potential options for closure of rectovesical fistula in certain situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 3","pages":"139-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/cren.2019.0132","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38624213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-09-17eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1089/cren.2019.0146
Alexey G Martov, Olga Al Plekhanova, Dmitry V Ergakov, Nikolay A Baykov
Introduction: Urethral stenting became popular two decades ago, but nowadays its frequency is slightly decreased because of the rising application of urethroplasty. Today urethral stenting is reserved only for failure after urethral reconstruction or in cases when the plastic surgery is unfavorable. The Memokath stent (Pnn Medical A/S, Kvistgaard, Denmark) is manufactured from a biocompatible alloy of nickel and titanium and known to be the most popular in this field. Case Description: A 38-year-old man with a history of 9 years Memokath urethral stenting was admitted to our clinic with obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms. The indication for Memokath stenting was repeated recurrences after endoscopic and reconstructive operations. The plain radiography showed a normal position of the stent and only the endoscopic examination revealed its total calcification. New superpulse thulium fiber laser has been used to free the stent from the stones and safely remove it without additional urethral injury. Results: The postoperative time was within normal limits, the catheter was removed on the fourth day after operation. Three months follow-up was without stricture recurrence. We continue active surveillance of the patient. Conclusion: The calcification of the stent could be properly diagnosed endoscopically; the Memokath stent could be safely removed in 9 years after implantation; thulium fiber laser is effective and safe in the management of encrusted urethral stent.
导言:尿道支架置入术在二十年前开始流行,但现在由于尿道成形术的应用增加,其频率略有下降。如今,尿道支架置入术仅用于尿道重建失败或不宜进行整形手术的情况。Memokath支架(Pnn Medical A/S, Kvistgaard, Denmark)由镍和钛的生物相容性合金制成,是该领域最受欢迎的支架。病例描述:一名38岁男性,有9年Memokath尿道支架置入术史,因下尿路梗阻性症状入院。Memokath支架植入术的适应症是内镜和重建手术后反复复发。x线平片显示支架位置正常,只有内镜检查显示其完全钙化。新型超脉冲铥光纤激光已被用于将支架从结石中解放出来,并在不增加尿道损伤的情况下安全地将其移除。结果:术后时间均在正常范围内,于术后第4天拔除导管。随访3个月无狭窄复发。我们将继续对病人进行积极监测。结论:内窥镜下支架钙化可以正确诊断;Memokath支架植入后9年内可安全取出;铥光纤激光治疗尿道支架结痂安全有效。
{"title":"Thermoexpandable Urethral Nickel-Titanium Stent Memokath for Managing Urethral Bulbar Stricture After Failed Urethroplasty.","authors":"Alexey G Martov, Olga Al Plekhanova, Dmitry V Ergakov, Nikolay A Baykov","doi":"10.1089/cren.2019.0146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2019.0146","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Urethral stenting became popular two decades ago, but nowadays its frequency is slightly decreased because of the rising application of urethroplasty. Today urethral stenting is reserved only for failure after urethral reconstruction or in cases when the plastic surgery is unfavorable. The Memokath stent (Pnn Medical A/S, Kvistgaard, Denmark) is manufactured from a biocompatible alloy of nickel and titanium and known to be the most popular in this field. <b><i>Case Description:</i></b> A 38-year-old man with a history of 9 years Memokath urethral stenting was admitted to our clinic with obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms. The indication for Memokath stenting was repeated recurrences after endoscopic and reconstructive operations. The plain radiography showed a normal position of the stent and only the endoscopic examination revealed its total calcification. New superpulse thulium fiber laser has been used to free the stent from the stones and safely remove it without additional urethral injury. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The postoperative time was within normal limits, the catheter was removed on the fourth day after operation. Three months follow-up was without stricture recurrence. We continue active surveillance of the patient. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The calcification of the stent could be properly diagnosed endoscopically; the Memokath stent could be safely removed in 9 years after implantation; thulium fiber laser is effective and safe in the management of encrusted urethral stent.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 3","pages":"147-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/cren.2019.0146","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38624215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Management of primary bladder neck obstruction (PBNO) in women is difficult. Surgical treatment in the form of bladder neck incision (BNI) is indicated in many cases. There is no defined consensus on the best surgical technique of BNI in women. We present a novel technique of BNI in such cases using pediatric cystoscope and holmium laser, which is a promising alternative to the existing management techniques. Case Presentation: A 28-year-old lady complained of obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms. Serum biochemistry revealed azotemia. Further investigation utilizing a micturating cystourethrogram showed a closed bladder neck, and urodynamic studies revealed a high bladder outlet obstruction index suggestive of PBNO. BNI was effectively performed using pediatric cystoscope and holmium laser at 3, 9, and 12 o'clock positions. Postoperatively the patient had improving renal function and clinical improvement. Conclusion: Use of pediatric cystoscope with holmium laser for BNI in females is a novel technique that offers the advantage of higher maneuverability in the female urethra, precise incision with protection of external sphincter from thermal damage, and avoidance of the complication of vesicovaginal fistula caused by posterior incisions.
{"title":"Primary Bladder Neck Obstruction in a Young Woman: A Novel Technique of Bladder Neck Incision Using Holmium Laser.","authors":"Pankaj Panwar, Devanshu Bansal, Rakhul Lekha Raveendran, Anant Kumar","doi":"10.1089/cren.2019.0172","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2019.0172","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Management of primary bladder neck obstruction (PBNO) in women is difficult. Surgical treatment in the form of bladder neck incision (BNI) is indicated in many cases. There is no defined consensus on the best surgical technique of BNI in women. We present a novel technique of BNI in such cases using pediatric cystoscope and holmium laser, which is a promising alternative to the existing management techniques. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> A 28-year-old lady complained of obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms. Serum biochemistry revealed azotemia. Further investigation utilizing a micturating cystourethrogram showed a closed bladder neck, and urodynamic studies revealed a high bladder outlet obstruction index suggestive of PBNO. BNI was effectively performed using pediatric cystoscope and holmium laser at 3, 9, and 12 o'clock positions. Postoperatively the patient had improving renal function and clinical improvement. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Use of pediatric cystoscope with holmium laser for BNI in females is a novel technique that offers the advantage of higher maneuverability in the female urethra, precise incision with protection of external sphincter from thermal damage, and avoidance of the complication of vesicovaginal fistula caused by posterior incisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 3","pages":"153-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/cren.2019.0172","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38624217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-09-17eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1089/cren.2019.0127
Emma Rosenbluth, Ryan Chandhoke, Daniel C Rosen, Jacob N Bamberger, Mantu Gupta
Background: CT has become the gold standard for radiographic evaluation of urolithiasis. CT is highly sensitive for detecting kidney stones and provides valuable information regarding stone size, composition, location, and overall stone burden. Although CT can provide reliable estimations of stone size, we have encountered an instance in which it can be deceiving. Motion artifact in CT images can cause a warping distortion effect that makes renal stones appear larger than they actually are. Case Presentation: We describe a case of a 37-year-old woman with a history of kidney stones and obesity presenting with intermittent flank pain and gross hematuria, found to have a large lower pole renal calculus that appeared deceptively large on CT imaging. Given the apparent size and location of the stone, the patient was counseled and consented for a percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Although the stone was initially suspected to be >2 cm based on the preoperative CT scan, intraoperative pyelography revealed a much smaller than expected radio-dense stone. The patient was stone free after PCNL without any immediate postoperative complications. However, her course was later complicated by delayed bleeding causing significant clot hematuria, perinephric hematoma, and reactive pleural effusion. Conclusion: Although CT is especially valuable in preparing for surgery based on its ability to outline collecting system anatomy, it is important to remember that it can be deceiving. Correlation with kidney, ureter, and bladder radiograph and ultrasound is critical to understanding the clinical case and planning the optimal surgical approach.
{"title":"Deceived by a CT Scan: The Case of the Misrepresented Stone Size.","authors":"Emma Rosenbluth, Ryan Chandhoke, Daniel C Rosen, Jacob N Bamberger, Mantu Gupta","doi":"10.1089/cren.2019.0127","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2019.0127","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> CT has become the gold standard for radiographic evaluation of urolithiasis. CT is highly sensitive for detecting kidney stones and provides valuable information regarding stone size, composition, location, and overall stone burden. Although CT can provide reliable estimations of stone size, we have encountered an instance in which it can be deceiving. Motion artifact in CT images can cause a warping distortion effect that makes renal stones appear larger than they actually are. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> We describe a case of a 37-year-old woman with a history of kidney stones and obesity presenting with intermittent flank pain and gross hematuria, found to have a large lower pole renal calculus that appeared deceptively large on CT imaging. Given the apparent size and location of the stone, the patient was counseled and consented for a percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Although the stone was initially suspected to be >2 cm based on the preoperative CT scan, intraoperative pyelography revealed a much smaller than expected radio-dense stone. The patient was stone free after PCNL without any immediate postoperative complications. However, her course was later complicated by delayed bleeding causing significant clot hematuria, perinephric hematoma, and reactive pleural effusion. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Although CT is especially valuable in preparing for surgery based on its ability to outline collecting system anatomy, it is important to remember that it can be deceiving. Correlation with kidney, ureter, and bladder radiograph and ultrasound is critical to understanding the clinical case and planning the optimal surgical approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 3","pages":"114-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/cren.2019.0127","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38527403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Pheochromocytoma is a rare cause of hypertension in pregnancy, which is often overlooked; especially in late pregnancy because of more prevalent pre-eclampsia. It has been associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates in both mother and fetus, if not diagnosed and treated in time. Minimally invasive surgery has been infrequently used for surgical management of pheochromocytoma in pregnancy, with <20 reported cases in English literature. Case Presentation: A 26-year-old pregnant woman presented at 9 weeks of gestation with complaints of palpitations, sweating, and headache; with past history of first trimester spontaneous abortion caused by accelerated hypertension. She was found to have hypertension and diabetes, but no pedal edema, weight gain, or proteinuria. Ultrasonogram and MRI of abdomen revealed a left adrenal mass and 24 hours urinary catecholamines levels were increased, suggesting a pheochromocytoma. After preoperative optimization in consultations with obstetricians, endocrinologists, and anesthetists, she underwent laparoscopic left adrenalectomy during 15th week of gestation. Perioperative hospital course was uneventful for both mother and the fetus. After adrenalectomy, her diabetes was cured and hypertension was controlled with single antihypertensive. She was readmitted at 31 weeks of gestation with accelerated hypertension and underwent emergency caesarean for impending eclampsia at 32 weeks, and delivered a healthy female baby. 131I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scan and 68Ga-[1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid]-1-NaI(3)-octreotide positron emission tomography-CT (68Ga-DOTANOC PET-CT) scan was obtained in postpartum period to rule out any extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma, both of which did not reveal any abnormality. At 1 year follow-up, she is normoglycemic and hypertension controlled on single antihypertensive. Conclusion: Pheochromocytoma in pregnancy is a rare but potentially lethal condition, and high index of suspicion is required for early diagnosis. Multidisciplinary coordination is required for effective management of this rare condition. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is safe in second trimester of pregnancy for both mother and fetus.
{"title":"Successful Pregnancy Outcomes After Laparoscopic Management of Pheochromocytoma.","authors":"Pradeep Prakash, Vidushi Kulshrestha, Rashmi Ramachandran, Rajeev Kumar","doi":"10.1089/cren.2019.0139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2019.0139","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Pheochromocytoma is a rare cause of hypertension in pregnancy, which is often overlooked; especially in late pregnancy because of more prevalent pre-eclampsia. It has been associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates in both mother and fetus, if not diagnosed and treated in time. Minimally invasive surgery has been infrequently used for surgical management of pheochromocytoma in pregnancy, with <20 reported cases in English literature. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> A 26-year-old pregnant woman presented at 9 weeks of gestation with complaints of palpitations, sweating, and headache; with past history of first trimester spontaneous abortion caused by accelerated hypertension. She was found to have hypertension and diabetes, but no pedal edema, weight gain, or proteinuria. Ultrasonogram and MRI of abdomen revealed a left adrenal mass and 24 hours urinary catecholamines levels were increased, suggesting a pheochromocytoma. After preoperative optimization in consultations with obstetricians, endocrinologists, and anesthetists, she underwent laparoscopic left adrenalectomy during 15th week of gestation. Perioperative hospital course was uneventful for both mother and the fetus. After adrenalectomy, her diabetes was cured and hypertension was controlled with single antihypertensive. She was readmitted at 31 weeks of gestation with accelerated hypertension and underwent emergency caesarean for impending eclampsia at 32 weeks, and delivered a healthy female baby. 131I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scan and 68Ga-[1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid]-1-NaI(3)-octreotide positron emission tomography-CT (68Ga-DOTANOC PET-CT) scan was obtained in postpartum period to rule out any extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma, both of which did not reveal any abnormality. At 1 year follow-up, she is normoglycemic and hypertension controlled on single antihypertensive. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Pheochromocytoma in pregnancy is a rare but potentially lethal condition, and high index of suspicion is required for early diagnosis. Multidisciplinary coordination is required for effective management of this rare condition. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is safe in second trimester of pregnancy for both mother and fetus.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 3","pages":"170-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/cren.2019.0139","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38527759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-09-17eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1089/cren.2019.0091
Akbar Nouralizadeh, Arsalan Aslani, Iman Ghanaat, Milad Bonakdar Hashemi
Background: Delayed bleeding after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), which may occur within the first 3 weeks postoperatively, is a life-threatening complication that may result from arteriovenous fistula and arterial pseudoaneurysm. Angioembolization is the standard treatment when these patients develop hemodynamic instability despite conservative measures. Contrast hypersensitivity and renal insufficiency, however, contraindicate angiogram and subsequent embolization; in these patients, alternative methods such as the one described in this study may help in resolving the renal hemorrhage. Case Presentation: In this case series, we report the effective management of post-PCNL hemorrhage with nephroscopy and nephrostomy and drainage and tamponade because angioembolization was not feasible. Conclusion: Delayed bleeding after PCNL may be managed conservatively with nephrostomy drainage and tamponade when angioembolization is not feasible.
{"title":"Percutaneous Endoscopic Treatment of Complicated Delayed Bleeding Postpercutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Novel Suggestion.","authors":"Akbar Nouralizadeh, Arsalan Aslani, Iman Ghanaat, Milad Bonakdar Hashemi","doi":"10.1089/cren.2019.0091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2019.0091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Delayed bleeding after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), which may occur within the first 3 weeks postoperatively, is a life-threatening complication that may result from arteriovenous fistula and arterial pseudoaneurysm. Angioembolization is the standard treatment when these patients develop hemodynamic instability despite conservative measures. Contrast hypersensitivity and renal insufficiency, however, contraindicate angiogram and subsequent embolization; in these patients, alternative methods such as the one described in this study may help in resolving the renal hemorrhage. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> In this case series, we report the effective management of post-PCNL hemorrhage with nephroscopy and nephrostomy and drainage and tamponade because angioembolization was not feasible. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Delayed bleeding after PCNL may be managed conservatively with nephrostomy drainage and tamponade when angioembolization is not feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 3","pages":"124-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/cren.2019.0091","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38527844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-09-17eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0026
Jorge Panach-Navarrete, Rocío Tonazzi-Zorrilla, José María Martínez-Jabaloyas
Background: Ureterointestinal stenosis is a frequent complication after radical cystectomy, occurring in up to 10%-12% of cases. Endoscopic treatment of complete stenosis has been described through double access, with antegrade flexible ureteroscopy and simultaneous retrograde endoscopy through the intestinal diversion. We present a case of endoscopic treatment without use of antegrade ureteroscopy. Case Presentation: A 52-year-old man underwent surgery for peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to mucinous adenocarcinoma. Ileocecal resection, omentectomy, sigmoidectomy, rectal resection, cystoprostatectomy, and ileal duct were performed. He had a complicated postoperative period because of enterocutaneous fistulas, peritonitis, and secondary intention wall closure, needing multiple surgeries. Four months later, he was diagnosed with left ureteroinestinal stenosis, for which endoscopic management was the chosen treatment. Intraoperative diagnosis was complete stenosis. To locate the stenosis, methylene blue was instilled using a percutaneous ureteral catheter. With a resectoscope inserted through the ileal duct, the stenosis was observed and opened using cold knife and Collins knife. The stenosis was resolved satisfactorily. Conclusion: Endoscopic management of complete ureterointestinal stenosis is a viable treatment option. Although stenosis localization has previously been described with two endoscopes using transillumination, we demonstrate another localization technique using methylene blue.
{"title":"Endoscopic Treatment of Complete Ureterointestinal Stenosis Without Antegrade Ureteroscopy.","authors":"Jorge Panach-Navarrete, Rocío Tonazzi-Zorrilla, José María Martínez-Jabaloyas","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Ureterointestinal stenosis is a frequent complication after radical cystectomy, occurring in up to 10%-12% of cases. Endoscopic treatment of complete stenosis has been described through double access, with antegrade flexible ureteroscopy and simultaneous retrograde endoscopy through the intestinal diversion. We present a case of endoscopic treatment without use of antegrade ureteroscopy. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> A 52-year-old man underwent surgery for peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to mucinous adenocarcinoma. Ileocecal resection, omentectomy, sigmoidectomy, rectal resection, cystoprostatectomy, and ileal duct were performed. He had a complicated postoperative period because of enterocutaneous fistulas, peritonitis, and secondary intention wall closure, needing multiple surgeries. Four months later, he was diagnosed with left ureteroinestinal stenosis, for which endoscopic management was the chosen treatment. Intraoperative diagnosis was complete stenosis. To locate the stenosis, methylene blue was instilled using a percutaneous ureteral catheter. With a resectoscope inserted through the ileal duct, the stenosis was observed and opened using cold knife and Collins knife. The stenosis was resolved satisfactorily. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Endoscopic management of complete ureterointestinal stenosis is a viable treatment option. Although stenosis localization has previously been described with two endoscopes using transillumination, we demonstrate another localization technique using methylene blue.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 3","pages":"188-191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/cren.2020.0026","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38534279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-09-17eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1089/cren.2019.0157
Usama Khater, Ranjith Ramasamy, Hemendra N Shah
Background: Tamsulosin in a widely used drug in urology practice in treating lower urinary tract symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia, distal ureteral stones, and ureteral stent-related symptoms. Ischemic priapism is a rare but serious adverse effect of tamsulosin. We report two cases of tamsulosin-induced priapism and reviewed available literature citing priapism as a complication of tamsulosin. We also reviewed the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to identify reported cases of tamsulosin-induced priapism. Case Presentation: First patient was a 61-year-old African American male with paraplegia of 30-year duration. He developed priapism after taking first dose of tamsulosin for lower urinary tract symptoms. He presented with 18 hours of painful erection and was treated with aspiration and irrigation, followed by phenylephrine injection. The patient maintained potency after treatment. The second patient was a 24-year-old male who received tamsulosin in the emergency department as medical expulsive therapy for 11 mm distal ureteral stone. Since he had intractable pain, he underwent emergency primary ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy as definitive treatment of his ureteral calculus. He developed intraoperative priapism that subsided postoperatively. However, he was discharged with tamsulosin to reduce stent-related urinary symptoms. He returned back to the emergency department after 3 days with persistent priapism for 3 days and needed penoscrotal corporeal decompression to treat his priapism. At 6 weeks follow-up visit, the patient has lost his potency. Although there were only 4 case reports on review of the literature, we were able to identify 46 cases reported in the U.S. FAERS database. Conclusion: Priapism can be an adverse reaction to tamsulosin. Providers and patients should be aware about this complication to ensure early seeking of management to avoid devastating outcomes, particularly in young patients when tamsulosin is given as medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stone and stent-related symptoms.
{"title":"Tamsulosin-Induced Priapism: Report of Two Cases and Review of Literature.","authors":"Usama Khater, Ranjith Ramasamy, Hemendra N Shah","doi":"10.1089/cren.2019.0157","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2019.0157","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Tamsulosin in a widely used drug in urology practice in treating lower urinary tract symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia, distal ureteral stones, and ureteral stent-related symptoms. Ischemic priapism is a rare but serious adverse effect of tamsulosin. We report two cases of tamsulosin-induced priapism and reviewed available literature citing priapism as a complication of tamsulosin. We also reviewed the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to identify reported cases of tamsulosin-induced priapism. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> First patient was a 61-year-old African American male with paraplegia of 30-year duration. He developed priapism after taking first dose of tamsulosin for lower urinary tract symptoms. He presented with 18 hours of painful erection and was treated with aspiration and irrigation, followed by phenylephrine injection. The patient maintained potency after treatment. The second patient was a 24-year-old male who received tamsulosin in the emergency department as medical expulsive therapy for 11 mm distal ureteral stone. Since he had intractable pain, he underwent emergency primary ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy as definitive treatment of his ureteral calculus. He developed intraoperative priapism that subsided postoperatively. However, he was discharged with tamsulosin to reduce stent-related urinary symptoms. He returned back to the emergency department after 3 days with persistent priapism for 3 days and needed penoscrotal corporeal decompression to treat his priapism. At 6 weeks follow-up visit, the patient has lost his potency. Although there were only 4 case reports on review of the literature, we were able to identify 46 cases reported in the U.S. FAERS database. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Priapism can be an adverse reaction to tamsulosin. Providers and patients should be aware about this complication to ensure early seeking of management to avoid devastating outcomes, particularly in young patients when tamsulosin is given as medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stone and stent-related symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 3","pages":"174-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/cren.2019.0157","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38527760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-09-17eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1089/cren.2019.0186
Beatriz Fernández-Bautista, Jose María Angulo, Rubén Ortiz, Laura Burgos, Javier Ordóñez, Alberto Parente
Introduction: Congenital ureteral valves are a rare cause of ureteral obstruction that may lead to renal function deterioration. We present two clinical cases treated endoscopically by monopolar electrocautery and laser fiber ablation. Presentation of Case: The first case is a 13-year-old male with several episodes of abdominal pain and was found to have severe left hydronephrosis. Ultrasonography showed a dilated ureter and pelvicaliceal system with an obstructive renogram curve. We performed a retrograde pyelogram, finding a dilated ureter 5 cm up from the vesicoureteral junction with ureteral valves in that place. Ablation of the valves was conducted using monopolar electrocautery. The second case is a 2-year-old male with left ureterohydronephrosis shown in abdominal ultrasonography. In the radiologic findings, a high-risk pyelocaliceal dilatation with renal parenchyma thinning and a diameter of 3.3 cm for the left ureter is described, with an obstructive renogram. We performed a cystoscopy, observing the presence of valves in the ureter at 3 cm that conditioned an obstruction. The complete section of the valves was performed through a 270μm holmium laser fiber. Our patients made an uneventful postoperative recovery and continue to remain completely asymptomatic. A significant decrease in renal dilation was observed and renal function recovered in both cases. Conclusion: Ureteral valves are an uncommon cause of ureteral obstruction. Advances in endourologic techniques allow us to give a minimally invasive approach to these diseases, obtaining good long-term results in our small series of patients.
{"title":"Endourologic Treatment in Two Cases of Ureteral Valves.","authors":"Beatriz Fernández-Bautista, Jose María Angulo, Rubén Ortiz, Laura Burgos, Javier Ordóñez, Alberto Parente","doi":"10.1089/cren.2019.0186","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2019.0186","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Congenital ureteral valves are a rare cause of ureteral obstruction that may lead to renal function deterioration. We present two clinical cases treated endoscopically by monopolar electrocautery and laser fiber ablation. <b><i>Presentation of Case:</i></b> The first case is a 13-year-old male with several episodes of abdominal pain and was found to have severe left hydronephrosis. Ultrasonography showed a dilated ureter and pelvicaliceal system with an obstructive renogram curve. We performed a retrograde pyelogram, finding a dilated ureter 5 cm up from the vesicoureteral junction with ureteral valves in that place. Ablation of the valves was conducted using monopolar electrocautery. The second case is a 2-year-old male with left ureterohydronephrosis shown in abdominal ultrasonography. In the radiologic findings, a high-risk pyelocaliceal dilatation with renal parenchyma thinning and a diameter of 3.3 cm for the left ureter is described, with an obstructive renogram. We performed a cystoscopy, observing the presence of valves in the ureter at 3 cm that conditioned an obstruction. The complete section of the valves was performed through a 270μm holmium laser fiber. Our patients made an uneventful postoperative recovery and continue to remain completely asymptomatic. A significant decrease in renal dilation was observed and renal function recovered in both cases. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Ureteral valves are an uncommon cause of ureteral obstruction. Advances in endourologic techniques allow us to give a minimally invasive approach to these diseases, obtaining good long-term results in our small series of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 3","pages":"213-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/cren.2019.0186","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38534284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}