ABSTRAKT: The demise of significant Czech museologist, associate professor Zbyněk Zbyslav Stránský, raised interest in his work and in its competent evaluation. The authors of individual texts mostly agree with each other in their opinions, but sometimes they have different views, which is understandable. However, several opinions clearly show that their authors misunderstood some of Stránský’s fundamental postulates. This text analyses the international discourse and comments on disputable statements. It explains, extends and critically evaluates the concept by Stránský, and thereby shifts the whole studied problem to a higher level. Místo Z. Z. Stránského v současné muzeologii Odchod významného českého muzeologa docenta Zbyňka Zbyslava Stránského vyvolal mezinárodní zájem o jeho dílo, respektive o jeho zhodnocení. Autoři textů se ve většině svých tvrzení shodují, někdy mají odlišné názory, což je zcela pochopitelné. Objevily se však i názory svědčící o nepochopení některých dosti podstatných postulátů. Tento text mezinárodní diskusi vyhodnocuje, sporná tvrzení komentuje. Vysvětluje, rozšiřuje a kriticky vyhodnocuje Stránského pojetí, a tak celou zkoumanou problematiku posouvá na vyšší úroveň. https://doi.org/10.5817/MuB2019-2-2 opinions, which is understandable. In some cases we can find certain misunderstandings or small mistakes in these texts. Therefore I consider it necessary to analyse the previous discourse, summarize the knowledge and thereby shift the whole studied problem to a higher level. In the core of this text I am dealing with reasons for the rejection of Stránský’s concept rather than with its acceptance. Most authors indeed consider Z. Z. Stránský a significant world-renowned museologist and they accept his approaches with major or minor reservations, in the most cases only partially. General accordance exists that his ideas significantly influenced museology in former Eastern Bloc, inclusive of Yugoslavia. His concept penetrated on a limited scale to Asia and only a bit also to Africa. However, we could also mention Scandinavia or other countries. Stránský’s influence was relatively distinct in Switzerland (Martin Schärer), in West Germany and Austria, above all due to works of professor Friedrich Waidacher1 1 Waidacher’s Handbuch der allgemeinen Museologie was translated into Slovak, Chinese, Ukrainian, Lithuanian and Hungarian, which undoubtedly considerably boosted the dissemination of Stránský’s approaches. Stránský, in my opinion, unfortunately spent too much time commenting on texts of his significant promoters (Waidacher, Schärer), who in fact were influential disseminators of his ideas, although they did it in their own style. Stránský’s review of the book Die Ausstellung. Theorie und Exempel by Schärer consists much empty and critical philosophising, but the reader learns in fact nothing about the content of this book, which, in my opinion, is a very good piece of writing. STRÁNSKÝ, Zbyněk Zbyslav. Schärer, Martin R.
这些国家的博物馆学家对他的想法很熟悉，但他们大多不接受(Patrick Boylan, Gaynor Kavanagh, Susan Pearce和其他人)zbynunk Z. Stránský是20世纪60年代中期开始在中欧形成的博物馆学思想的领军人物之一，来自拉丁美洲和世界其他地区的专家做出了重大贡献。我将把这个“学派”称为“中欧”，完全意识到这个术语有些不准确。当时，布尔诺的摩拉维亚博物馆由Jan Jelínek领导，他是一个有远见的人，他非常清楚博物馆必须摆脱日常工作，不仅能够“进入橱窗”，而且能够“超越橱窗”。他觉得有必要在博物馆应用一般的工作方法。为了使他的想法成为现实，他是少数几个使用“物品博物馆化”这个词的英国人之一。KAVANAGH,盖纳。英国博物馆学研究现状及未来研究需求。《博物馆学论文》，1989年，第1卷，第92-103页。3 Peter van Mensch正确地命名了一本英国书，在关于“博物馆理论”的段落中只提到了英语的书面资料，而“新博物馆理论”只是在1989年Peter Vergo - new Museology这本书的出版后才开始为作者提供。见先生，彼得·范。zbynunk工作中的元气象学挑战Stránský。《Brunensia博物馆志》2016年第5卷第5期。2，第23页。这可能是一种文化傲慢的表现，也可能只是一种“温和的民主化”(一个由当代捷克哲学家Václav Bělohradský提出的概念)，也就是说，许多作家在任何时候都在写任何东西，这是一种自信的表现。3 .发现了将博物馆学确立为大学学科并开始与国内外保持适当联系的学术研究者zz . Z. StránskýStránský的博物馆学因此获得了一个根本的“遗传”缺陷。与其他科学不同，它是“自下而上”产生的。当地质学家发现动物化石时，他们认识到建立古生物学的必要性。最初对人类过去的广泛研究导致了考古学、民族学等的专业化和出现。历史学家至少不具备部分民族学或考古学知识是不行的。但是，当今社会或自然科学的哪位代表在他/她的科学工作中需要博物馆学研究的结果呢?Stránský的博物馆学表现出一种“孤立主义”;在捷克斯洛伐克，它与文化学或文化人类学完全无关，这导致它经常不被接受，或者有人认为它只应该作为一种培训博物馆工作人员的方法。Stránský的博物馆学并不是其他科学学科的“女儿”。Stránský的想法逐渐为ICOFOM所熟知和接受。1980年在墨西哥举行的国际博协大会部分致力于“博物馆学的系统和系统理论”。20世纪90年代初，ICOFOM明确了其使命:“将博物馆学建立为一门科学学科”然而，必须指出的是，论坛在意识形态上远非异质，其影响并非无处不在。许多有影响力和经常被引用的博物馆学家并没有寻找博物馆学的学术基础，也没有参与其中。说到这里，我们可以问一个问题，今天有多少有远见的人领导着世界博物馆。5 . 1989-1993年国际博协主席是彼得·凡·门施。国际博委会的活动，没有使用其产品。在我看来，第二种“非icofom”流在今天占主导地位。那么，目前对z。z。Stránský工作的看法是怎样的呢?彼得·范·门施教授甚至在铁幕倒塌之前就积极参加了布尔诺博物馆学暑期学校(ISSOM)，他可能理所当然地被认为是“东方”博物馆学的主要专家。在Stránský灭亡之前，他正确地写道，与博物馆化的概念不同，Stránský的博物馆性的概念并没有被广泛接受我们可以补充说，博物馆化一词是由于西欧思想家(如赫尔曼·莱伯)而不是由于Stránský的努力而为人所知的。Stránský本人也没有反驳这一说法。凡·门施将“博物馆性”一词转移到博物馆学的历史中，8声称它只适合在早餐时谈论，而且，还有一点怀旧这位重要的荷兰博物馆学家的拒绝基于Stránský于1986年在莱顿举行的一次从未发表过的讲座，我认为从系统的角度来看，这是不够的，以及Stránský 1995年夏季博物馆学学校的文本。我故意把经常遇到的术语“东方”放在引号里。这种方式主要由来自西欧的同事使用。仿佛“东方”开始于德国和波希米亚之间的边界，结束于上海的某个同质地区。 尽管有许多相互影响，但将中欧(东欧)的方法与日本、印度、中国或美国的博物馆学概念混合在一起是不自然的
{"title":"The role of Z.Z. Stránský in present-day museology","authors":"J. Dolak","doi":"10.5817/mub2019-2-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/mub2019-2-2","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRAKT: The demise of significant Czech museologist, associate professor Zbyněk Zbyslav Stránský, raised interest in his work and in its competent evaluation. The authors of individual texts mostly agree with each other in their opinions, but sometimes they have different views, which is understandable. However, several opinions clearly show that their authors misunderstood some of Stránský’s fundamental postulates. This text analyses the international discourse and comments on disputable statements. It explains, extends and critically evaluates the concept by Stránský, and thereby shifts the whole studied problem to a higher level. Místo Z. Z. Stránského v současné muzeologii Odchod významného českého muzeologa docenta Zbyňka Zbyslava Stránského vyvolal mezinárodní zájem o jeho dílo, respektive o jeho zhodnocení. Autoři textů se ve většině svých tvrzení shodují, někdy mají odlišné názory, což je zcela pochopitelné. Objevily se však i názory svědčící o nepochopení některých dosti podstatných postulátů. Tento text mezinárodní diskusi vyhodnocuje, sporná tvrzení komentuje. Vysvětluje, rozšiřuje a kriticky vyhodnocuje Stránského pojetí, a tak celou zkoumanou problematiku posouvá na vyšší úroveň. https://doi.org/10.5817/MuB2019-2-2 opinions, which is understandable. In some cases we can find certain misunderstandings or small mistakes in these texts. Therefore I consider it necessary to analyse the previous discourse, summarize the knowledge and thereby shift the whole studied problem to a higher level. In the core of this text I am dealing with reasons for the rejection of Stránský’s concept rather than with its acceptance. Most authors indeed consider Z. Z. Stránský a significant world-renowned museologist and they accept his approaches with major or minor reservations, in the most cases only partially. General accordance exists that his ideas significantly influenced museology in former Eastern Bloc, inclusive of Yugoslavia. His concept penetrated on a limited scale to Asia and only a bit also to Africa. However, we could also mention Scandinavia or other countries. Stránský’s influence was relatively distinct in Switzerland (Martin Schärer), in West Germany and Austria, above all due to works of professor Friedrich Waidacher1 1 Waidacher’s Handbuch der allgemeinen Museologie was translated into Slovak, Chinese, Ukrainian, Lithuanian and Hungarian, which undoubtedly considerably boosted the dissemination of Stránský’s approaches. Stránský, in my opinion, unfortunately spent too much time commenting on texts of his significant promoters (Waidacher, Schärer), who in fact were influential disseminators of his ideas, although they did it in their own style. Stránský’s review of the book Die Ausstellung. Theorie und Exempel by Schärer consists much empty and critical philosophising, but the reader learns in fact nothing about the content of this book, which, in my opinion, is a very good piece of writing. STRÁNSKÝ, Zbyněk Zbyslav. Schärer, Martin R. ","PeriodicalId":36780,"journal":{"name":"Museologica Brunensia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71350599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Revolúcia 1848/1849 a Slovenské národné hnutie v múzejnej prezentácii","authors":"Ľuboš Kačírek","doi":"10.5817/MUB2019-1-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/MUB2019-1-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36780,"journal":{"name":"Museologica Brunensia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71350903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
One of important tasks of museums is to educate the visitors and wake their interest in topics presented in museum exhibitions. The question is whether the museums are able to offer an extension to formal education in schools and become herewith their partner. The schoolteachers are trained pedagogues in individual disciplines but they rarely have expert knowledge in these special areas (for example in geology). Moreover, the extent and usability of school collections for educational purposes beyond the scope of regular teaching are considerably limited. Museums have much to offer to the schools; the extension of normal teaching mainly consists in the possibility of object learning, in which the museums find no serious rival due to their extensive collections. They also can offer a greater support to schoolchildren who are gifted in disciplines represented in museums. Museums thus play an important role in the field of object learning due to their collection items, and this fact must be shown in a transparent view.
{"title":"Museum work with gifted schoolchildren : Geology Olympiad in the Czech Republic","authors":"J. Pešková, Lucie Jagošová","doi":"10.5817/MUB2019-1-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/MUB2019-1-6","url":null,"abstract":"One of important tasks of museums is to educate the visitors and wake their interest in topics presented in museum exhibitions. The question is whether the museums are able to offer an extension to formal education in schools and become herewith their partner. The schoolteachers are trained pedagogues in individual disciplines but they rarely have expert knowledge in these special areas (for example in geology). Moreover, the extent and usability of school collections for educational purposes beyond the scope of regular teaching are considerably limited. Museums have much to offer to the schools; the extension of normal teaching mainly consists in the possibility of object learning, in which the museums find no serious rival due to their extensive collections. They also can offer a greater support to schoolchildren who are gifted in disciplines represented in museums. Museums thus play an important role in the field of object learning due to their collection items, and this fact must be shown in a transparent view.","PeriodicalId":36780,"journal":{"name":"Museologica Brunensia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71350541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Regionální muzeum jako komunitní centrum : smysl \"malých\" muzeí v 21. století","authors":"P. Beránek","doi":"10.5817/mub2019-2-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/mub2019-2-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36780,"journal":{"name":"Museologica Brunensia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71350651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRAKT: In countries like Greece, where the material remains of the past play a predominant role in fostering a unifying national identity, the inspirational moment is antiquity. The aura of the authentic enlivens the discussion by fostering strong epistemological and political idioms vis-à-vis heritage applications. The present article argues that the quest for authenticity in Hellenic heritage cuts through different styles, aesthetic approaches and technological means in order to put forth powerful stereotypes which can be traced both in speech and in exhibition contexts and affect the contemporary reception of material remnants. In this view, two generically distinct case-studies are discussed: The Parthenon marbles as presented in the speech of the then Minister of Culture, Antonios Samaras, at the Opening Ceremony of the New Acropolis Museum in 2009, and Digital Miletus, a by now classical virtual reality application featuring the reconstruction of the ancient city of Miletus, at the Foundation of the Hellenic World in Athens around the millennium. While the above examples seem initially opposing in terms of the kind of authenticity they invoke, they underline the same core notion, namely the identification of truths and values which travel, as in a time capsule, inside the ancient remnants. If heritage is to be critically assessed we need to move beyond the notion of finite contexts and unbreakable continuities and understand heritage representations more https://doi.org/10.5817/MuB2019-2-1 kladu vzhledem k typu autenticity, na niž se odvolávají. Oba však sledují stejný cíl, a sice identifikaci skutečností a hodnot, jež jsou obsaženy ve starověkých památkách a cestují časem společně s nimi. Pokud chceme přistupovat ke kulturnímu dědictví kritickým způsobem, musíme nahlížet za hranice neměnných souvislostí a neporušitelných kontinuit a vnímat projevy kulturního dědictví pružněji. Musíme přehodnotit jak jejich formu tak i obsah, protože obě tyto kategorie v sobě skrývají prvky argumentace a nejsou pouze objektivními, neutrálními prostředky sloužícími k zábavě a poučení. KEYWORDS/KLÍČOVÁ SLOVA: authenticity – ethnocentrism – heritage – modern idealism – virtual reality – transparency – reflexivity autentičnost – etnocentrismus – kulturní dědictví – novodobý idealismus – virtuální realita – transparentnost – reflexivita
摘要:在像希腊这样的国家，过去的物质遗迹在培养统一的民族认同方面发挥着主导作用，古代是鼓舞人心的时刻。真实的光环通过培养强大的认识论和政治习语来活跃讨论-à-vis遗产应用。本文认为，对希腊遗产真实性的追求跨越了不同的风格、美学方法和技术手段，从而产生了强大的刻板印象，这些刻板印象可以在演讲和展览中找到，并影响了当代对物质遗迹的接受。在这种观点下，我们讨论了两个不同的案例:2009年，希腊文化部长Antonios Samaras在新卫城博物馆开幕式上的演讲中展示的帕台农神庙大理石，以及千年前后雅典希腊世界奠基会上的数字米利都(Digital Miletus)，这是一个经典的虚拟现实应用，以重建米利都古城为特色。虽然上面的例子在它们所引用的真实性方面似乎最初是对立的，但它们强调了相同的核心概念，即对真理和价值观的识别，就像在时间胶囊中一样，在古代遗迹中旅行。如果要对遗产进行批判性评估，我们需要超越有限背景和不可打破的连续性的概念，更多地理解遗产的表现https://doi.org/10.5817/MuB2019-2-1 kladu vzhledem k typu authenticity, na ninise odvolávají。奥巴马však sledují stejný cíl，一个国家的身份识别skutečností和hodnot, jejejsou obsaženy ve starověkých památkách和cestují asem spolole尼米。Pokud chceme přistupovat ke kulturnímu dědictví kritickým způsobem, musíme nahlížet za hranice neměnných souvislostí a neporušitelných kontinuit a vnímat project kulturního dědictví pružněji。Musíme přehodnotit jak jejich formu taki obsah, protože obytyto category v sobyi skrývají prvky argumenta nejsou pouze objektivními, neutrálními prostředky sloužícími k zábavě a poučení。关键词/KLÍČOVÁ SLOVA:真实性-民族中心主义-遗产-现代理想主义-虚拟现实-透明度-反身性autenti nost -民族中心主义- kulturní dědictví - novodobý理想主义- virtuální现实主义-透明-反身性
{"title":"From the ideal to the spectacular : Hellenic antiquity and the discourse of authenticity","authors":"Delia Tzortzaki","doi":"10.5817/mub2019-2-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/mub2019-2-1","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRAKT: In countries like Greece, where the material remains of the past play a predominant role in fostering a unifying national identity, the inspirational moment is antiquity. The aura of the authentic enlivens the discussion by fostering strong epistemological and political idioms vis-à-vis heritage applications. The present article argues that the quest for authenticity in Hellenic heritage cuts through different styles, aesthetic approaches and technological means in order to put forth powerful stereotypes which can be traced both in speech and in exhibition contexts and affect the contemporary reception of material remnants. In this view, two generically distinct case-studies are discussed: The Parthenon marbles as presented in the speech of the then Minister of Culture, Antonios Samaras, at the Opening Ceremony of the New Acropolis Museum in 2009, and Digital Miletus, a by now classical virtual reality application featuring the reconstruction of the ancient city of Miletus, at the Foundation of the Hellenic World in Athens around the millennium. While the above examples seem initially opposing in terms of the kind of authenticity they invoke, they underline the same core notion, namely the identification of truths and values which travel, as in a time capsule, inside the ancient remnants. If heritage is to be critically assessed we need to move beyond the notion of finite contexts and unbreakable continuities and understand heritage representations more https://doi.org/10.5817/MuB2019-2-1 kladu vzhledem k typu autenticity, na niž se odvolávají. Oba však sledují stejný cíl, a sice identifikaci skutečností a hodnot, jež jsou obsaženy ve starověkých památkách a cestují časem společně s nimi. Pokud chceme přistupovat ke kulturnímu dědictví kritickým způsobem, musíme nahlížet za hranice neměnných souvislostí a neporušitelných kontinuit a vnímat projevy kulturního dědictví pružněji. Musíme přehodnotit jak jejich formu tak i obsah, protože obě tyto kategorie v sobě skrývají prvky argumentace a nejsou pouze objektivními, neutrálními prostředky sloužícími k zábavě a poučení. KEYWORDS/KLÍČOVÁ SLOVA: authenticity – ethnocentrism – heritage – modern idealism – virtual reality – transparency – reflexivity autentičnost – etnocentrismus – kulturní dědictví – novodobý idealismus – virtuální realita – transparentnost – reflexivita","PeriodicalId":36780,"journal":{"name":"Museologica Brunensia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71350583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Doc. Ing. Ivan Herčko, Csc. – jeho prínos pre muzeológiu ako vedu","authors":"E. Hegyi","doi":"10.5817/mub2019-2-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/mub2019-2-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36780,"journal":{"name":"Museologica Brunensia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71350723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Na výstavě jsou k vidění historické materiály od nejznámější cestovatelské dvojice Jiří Hanzelka & Miroslav Zikmund. Tito cestovatelé procestovali celý svět a publikovali o svých cestách desítky knih. Na Novou Guineu cestovali právě v klíčový moment, kdy z území odcházeli Holanďané a vzniklo nové území Irian Jaya. Na této cestě vznikl rukopis, který v minulém režimu nebylo možné publikovat, avšak dnes je spolu s dalšími cestopisnými rukopisy plně k dispozici.2
{"title":"Výprava do Indonésie s Moravským zemským muzeem","authors":"Barbora Klimentová, Lenka Tranová","doi":"10.5817/MUB2019-1-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/MUB2019-1-5","url":null,"abstract":"Na výstavě jsou k vidění historické materiály od nejznámější cestovatelské dvojice Jiří Hanzelka & Miroslav Zikmund. Tito cestovatelé procestovali celý svět a publikovali o svých cestách desítky knih. Na Novou Guineu cestovali právě v klíčový moment, kdy z území odcházeli Holanďané a vzniklo nové území Irian Jaya. Na této cestě vznikl rukopis, který v minulém režimu nebylo možné publikovat, avšak dnes je spolu s dalšími cestopisnými rukopisy plně k dispozici.2","PeriodicalId":36780,"journal":{"name":"Museologica Brunensia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71350920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：