Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online最新文献

Purpose

Flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tendinitis is an uncommon but important cause of volar radial wrist pain that can be a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. We present a series of patients with FCR tendinitis managed successfully with an algorithm developed by the senior author.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients treated for FCR tendinitis at a hand practice was performed. The percent of the FCR rupture, determined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperative confirmation, determined specific treatment. Patients with less than 50% rupture on MRI were treated conservatively. Surgery was indicated if this failed to yield relief or MRI suggested >50% rupture. On intraoperative examination, patients with less than 50% rupture underwent tenosynovectomy and excision of trapezial osteophytes. Patients with greater than 50% rupture underwent an FCR-sacrificing procedure. Patient-reported outcomes including severity of pain with activities of daily living and ability to return to previous levels of activity were obtained.

Results

Sixteen patients were treated for FCR tendinitis. Five were treated conservatively, with complete relief of symptoms and return to full activity without sequelae in three of five cases. Four of the 11 surgical patients were found to have <50% tendon rupture and underwent an FCR-sparing procedure. The remaining seven patients had >50% tendon involvement, which required an FCR-sacrificing procedure. All surgical patients achieved satisfactory results in both functional and clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

This series demonstrates acceptable patient outcomes using the described FCR algorithm utilizing 50% FCR involvement as a benchmark.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.

Purpose

Trigger finger, a stenosing tenosynovitis of the flexor tendon at the A1 pulley, can cause pain and impair daily activities. Despite common surgical interventions, postsurgical complications are frequent, prompting the search for less invasive techniques.

Methods

An experimental study was conducted on fresh cadavers to compare three techniques: the first using a PulleyCut without ultrasound guidance, the second using a PulleyCut with ultrasound guidance, and the third using a percutaneous needle technique. The complete release of the A1 pulley, integrity of the A2 pulley, flexor tendons, and neurovascular bundles were assessed.

Results

The new device group and the ultrasound-guided group demonstrated 100% complete release of the A1 pulley, whereas the needle group achieved only 38% success. There were no A2 pulley injuries in any group. Flexor tendons were injured in 7% of cases in the new device group and 77% in the needle group. A neurovascular injury occurred in the needle group.

Conclusions

Compared with the percutaneous needle technique, the new device proved safe and effective for A1 pulley release, minimizing damage to flexor tendons and neurovascular structures. Ultrasound did not provide significant advantages, suggesting that the new device can be confidently used without ultrasound assistance. The PulleyCut represents a promising percutaneous technique for trigger finger treatment, demonstrating superiority over the needle technique in terms of efficacy and safety. These results encourage future clinical investigations to validate its practical application.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IIc.

Purpose

Effective patient–doctor communication is linked to improved patient functional and physiological health status, better adherence to physician recommendations, and increased patient satisfaction. However, studies show that patients have difficulty understanding and recalling information discussed during a medical encounter. The purpose of this study was to assess patient engagement, patient–doctor communication, and patient–doctor interactions with the utilization of a patient encounter card to help aid in communication.

Methods

New patients presenting to a single hand surgeon during an 8-month period between 2019 and 2020 were recruited for this study. Patients were recruited in pre and postintervention phases, defined by the rollout of a patient encounter card. Patients studied in the preintervention group were defined as the control population and experienced a typical office visit. The postintervention group experienced a typical office visit with the addition of a patient encounter card distributed to patients prior to meeting with the physician and screened by the physician during the visit to guide the encounter. Patient satisfaction and engagement surveys were collected during patient checkout process.

Results

Two hundred eighty-seven patients (70% participation rate) were enrolled in the preintervention (145) and postintervention (142) phases. The utilization of a patient encounter card for setting a visit agenda resulted in a significant increase in self-reported patient engagement, improving from 74% to 88%. In both phases, 98% of patients felt that the physician listened well or very well and reported high levels of confidence in the provider being able to address their primary health concerns (72% and 79%, respectively). Overall, patient satisfaction was maintained pre and postintervention (96% and 98%, respectively).

Conclusions

Use of the encounter card improved patients’ feelings of engagement during their visits. Further research is required to determine the impact of these tools on providers’ engagement and patient outcomes to improve quality of care in hand surgery.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic II.

Engaging patients and family members in formal feedback for health care processes can be impactful, especially when cultivating new care and research protocols. However, most surgical groups lack established systems for enlisting these critical stakeholders. This is a descriptive report of how we built our Patient and Family Advisory Council (PFAC) through a multistep process with patients, providers, research staff, and administrators. We also detail how it has advanced research, care, and mutually beneficial collaboration at our hand center. For example, our PFAC has provided vital input on multiple grant submissions, assisted with the development of a web-based digital application for thumb arthritis therapy, and improved our patient care approaches. To successfully create and sustain a PFAC, there must be commitment from multiple stakeholders across clinical, research, administration, and leadership spectra. Through this alliance, all stakeholders can develop better care and investigative strategies.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a web tutorial on perceptions of pain management and usage of opioids after carpal tunnel release surgery (post-CTR).

Methods

A web tutorial was developed by the authors, and patients were consented and enrolled if they were over the age of 18 years, could speak and understand English, and were having CTR. Patients were randomized to either view or not view the web tutorial before surgery, and all patients took a 19-question online survey approximately 2 weeks after surgery to assess their views on pain management and their self-reported opioid usage. All patients received standard-of-care instructions for postoperative pain management and were prescribed fifteen 5 mg tablets of oxycodone. Independent sample t tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, and chi-square tests were used to evaluate variables of interest.

Results

Sixty-seven patients were enrolled, with 17 lost to follow-up; therefore, 50 patients were included in the final study cohort and completed the online survey (n = 25/group). There were no statistically significant differences in age, gender (patient reported gender), race, and opioid use history between the groups, but there was a difference in education level with the group that did not watch the video having proportionally more participants whose highest level of education was postgraduate (36% vs 8%) and high school (24% vs 16%). There were no differences between groups in the perceptions of pain post-CTR based on survey statements, in reported opioid consumption on post-op day 1, or in perceived risk of prolonged opioid use. Conversely, on post-op days 2–6 (8% vs 28%) and 7–14 (0% vs 20%), fewer participants from the group that watched the video reported any opioid usage compared with the group that did not watch the video.

Conclusions

Our web tutorial did not notably impact the way patients perceived pain management or opioid risks post-CTR. However, a smaller proportion of the group that watched our tutorial reported opioid consumption post-CTR relative to the group that did not view our tutorial, suggesting that web tutorials may be a viable way to encourage patients to confer to minimal opioid usage and pain management regimens.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapy/Prevention, Etiology/Harm IV.

Biohacking is a term used to describe people making changes to their bodies to improve their well-being. This includes the implantation of radiofrequency identification implants. This technology for wireless communication is already incorporated into our daily lives as in the use of contactless payment and badges to open doors. Since the first radiofrequency identification implantation in a human in 1998, the possibilities of this technology have dramatically increased, and the number of persons that have been chipped is growing. The hand seems to be the most popular body part to implant these chips because it can easily be positioned close to a reader. Currently, implantation is typically not performed in a medical environment. However, implantation of these devices in humans can result in complications, such as infection and tendon attrition, and the relevant safety implications have not been extensively studied. The scope of this review was to inform the hand surgeon community about the existence of these implants, why they are used, and to open the debate about the possible future role of the hand surgeon in safely implanting these devices and dealing with possible complications.

Purpose

Preiser disease is difficult to diagnose and treat because of its unclear pathophysiology. Although both nonsurgical treatment and surgical treatment for Preiser disease have been reported, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment because of its rarity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between treatment selection and characteristics of patients with Preiser disease.

Methods

This single-institution retrospective chart review included nine patients (two men and seven women) with Preiser disease who were treated at our hospital. We divided patients into two groups consisting of elderly (older than 65 years of age) and nonelderly patients. Herbert-Lanzetta classification, presence of dorsal intercalated segment instability (DISI), Watson classification based on plain radiography, Kalainov classification based on magnetic resonance imaging, and treatment modalities were investigated in both groups.

Results

In the elderly group, three of five cases were in advanced stages of Preiser disease according to the Herbert-Lanzetta classification. Three wrists had a DISI deformity. Three patients underwent conservative treatment. The two remaining cases classified as Herbert-Lanzetta stage II underwent closing radial wedge osteotomy. In the nonelderly group, three of four cases were in the early stages of Preiser disease according to the Herbert-Lanzetta classification. One wrist had a DISI deformity. Two patients were treated conservatively. The other two patients were surgically treated using closing radial wedge osteotomy in one case and vascularized bone graft from the second metacarpal base in another case, both classified as Herbert-Lanzetta stage II.

Conclusions

Most elderly patients with Preiser disease showed concurrent DISI at the time of initial presentation and advanced stage. Most elderly patients underwent nonsurgical treatment. Even when surgical treatment is implemented, our study suggests that the less invasive and optimal treatment is closing radial wedge osteotomy.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.

Purpose

Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common peripheral nerve compressive neuropathy in clinical practice. Patients who fail nonsurgical management are indicated for carpal tunnel release (CTR), which can be performed open or endoscopically. Efforts have been made to utilize local anesthesia instead of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) for endoscopic release. This study seeks to compare perioperative surgical times and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing endoscopic CTR with local anesthesia versus MAC.

Methods

This is a 6-year retrospective study of 1,036 patients undergoing isolated endoscopic CTR with MAC (n = 607) versus local (n = 429) anesthesia within an outpatient surgical center. A combination of chi-square and t tests was used to compare the patient characteristics, operative details, and outcomes.

Results

The local cohort demonstrated significantly shorter postoperative time to discharge (15.9 ± 9.8 vs 53.8 ± 11.0 minutes; P < .05), total time spent in surgical center (83.2 ± 18.7 vs 129.3 ± 20.7 minutes; P < .05), shorter total operating room time (26.7 ± 4.3 vs 29.0 ± 4.1 minutes; P < .05) and tourniquet time (12.4 ± 2.5 vs 13.1 ± 2.1 minutes; P < .05). Preoperative and postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores were similar between the cohorts (P > .05); however, PROMIS pain interference improved to a higher degree between pre- and post-op in the local group (−1.5 vs −0.8; P = .02). Early and late surgical complications were similar between the groups (P > .05).

Conclusions

Patients within the MAC cohort demonstrated longer postoperative time to discharge and total time in the surgical center. The MAC cohort had longer operating room and tourniquet time, albeit not clinically significant. Surgical complications and PROMIS scores were similar between the two groups. Our findings suggest that local anesthesia is a safe and effective option for endoscopic CTR and may offer advantages in cost and convenience for patients.

Type of study/level of evidence

Retrospective cohort study/therapeutic III.

Resurfacing arthroplasty is increasingly used to treat arthrosis of the proximal interphalangeal joint. However, the presence of ankylosis increases the risk of complications; thus, there are few reports on this procedure in the context of ankylosis. The present report describes the case of a 32-year-old man who presented with posttraumatic proximal interphalangeal arthrosis with bony ankylosis in flexion and ulnar flexion. We performed resurfacing arthroplasty and collateral ligament reconstruction to correct ulnar flexion deformity. At 12 months after surgery, joint extension was −40° and flexion improved to 100° with no ulnar flexion deformity recurrence, loosening, or implant failure. Although resurfacing arthroplasty is generally not suitable for ankylosed joints, we obtained excellent results in this case of bony ankylosis of the proximal interphalangeal joint by adjusting the collateral ligament balance appropriately.