Pub Date : 2025-10-09DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100848
Alexander D. Jeffs MD , Océane Mauffrey BS , Nicholas C. Bank MD , Stephen J. Perle BS , Sonja A. Samant MD , Stephen M. Himmelberg MD , Gregory M. Knoll MD , J. Megan M. Patterson MD , Reid W. Draeger MD
Purpose
Ketorolac is a potent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that is beneficial in the ambulatory hand surgery setting. Reluctance exists in the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as ketorolac, after operative treatment of fractures at high risk for nonunion, such as scaphoid fractures. We hypothesized that postoperative ketorolac administration within 5 days of operative treatment for a scaphoid fracture would coincide with a higher rate of nonunion than no postoperative ketorolac administration.
Methods
A retrospective cohort was obtained from the TriNetX database. Patients ≥18 years old who underwent operative treatment of a scaphoid fracture from 2013 to 2023 were included. Patients with open fractures, prior nonunion, and infection were excluded. Cohorts were defined based on postoperative ketorolac use within 5 days of surgery. After propensity score matching, nonunion and nonunion revision surgery rates were determined and compared with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. Statistical significance was reported as an alpha error of < .05.
Results
A total of 2,063 matched patients (1,044 ketorolac; 1,019 no ketorolac) were compared. No considerable differences in nonunion rate and nonunion revision surgery rate were observed between the ketorolac and no ketorolac groups (4.3% vs 3.9%; OR, 1.102 [95% CI, 0.714–1.703] and 1.0% vs 1.5%; OR, 0.655 [95% CI, 0.302–1.417]).
Conclusions
Postoperative ketorolac use within 5 days of operative treatment does not considerably increase the rate of nonunion or nonunion revision surgery in operatively treated scaphoid fractures.
Type of study/level of evidence
Therapeutic III
目的:酮咯酸是一种有效的非甾体抗炎药,在门诊手外科环境中是有益的。对于舟状骨骨折等易发生骨不连的骨折,手术治疗后不愿使用非甾体类抗炎药,如酮罗拉酸。我们假设舟状骨骨折术后5天内给予酮罗拉酸治疗与术后未给予酮罗拉酸相比,骨不愈合的发生率更高。方法从TriNetX数据库中获得回顾性队列。纳入2013年至2023年接受舟状骨骨折手术治疗的≥18岁患者。排除开放性骨折、既往骨不连和感染的患者。根据术后5天内酮罗拉酸的使用情况来定义队列。倾向评分匹配后,确定骨不连和骨不连翻修手术率,并比较优势比(ORs)和95% ci。报告的alpha误差为<; 05,具有统计学意义。结果共有2063例匹配患者(服用酮咯酸1044例,未服用酮咯酸1019例)进行比较。酮洛酸组和无酮洛酸组的骨不连率和骨不连翻修手术率无显著差异(4.3% vs 3.9%; OR为1.102 [95% CI, 0.714-1.703]; OR为1.0% vs 1.5%; OR为0.655 [95% CI, 0.402 - 1.417])。结论术中舟状骨骨折术后5天内应用酮罗拉酸对骨不愈合及骨不愈合修复手术的发生率无显著影响。研究类型/证据水平:治疗性
{"title":"Postoperative Ketorolac Use and the Odds of a Nonunion in Operatively Treated Scaphoid Fractures","authors":"Alexander D. Jeffs MD , Océane Mauffrey BS , Nicholas C. Bank MD , Stephen J. Perle BS , Sonja A. Samant MD , Stephen M. Himmelberg MD , Gregory M. Knoll MD , J. Megan M. Patterson MD , Reid W. Draeger MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100848","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100848","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Ketorolac is a potent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that is beneficial in the ambulatory hand surgery setting. Reluctance exists in the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as ketorolac, after operative treatment of fractures at high risk for nonunion, such as scaphoid fractures. We hypothesized that postoperative ketorolac administration within 5 days of operative treatment for a scaphoid fracture would coincide with a higher rate of nonunion than no postoperative ketorolac administration.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort was obtained from the TriNetX database. Patients ≥18 years old who underwent operative treatment of a scaphoid fracture from 2013 to 2023 were included. Patients with open fractures, prior nonunion, and infection were excluded. Cohorts were defined based on postoperative ketorolac use within 5 days of surgery. After propensity score matching, nonunion and nonunion revision surgery rates were determined and compared with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. Statistical significance was reported as an alpha error of < .05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 2,063 matched patients (1,044 ketorolac; 1,019 no ketorolac) were compared. No considerable differences in nonunion rate and nonunion revision surgery rate were observed between the ketorolac and no ketorolac groups (4.3% vs 3.9%; OR, 1.102 [95% CI, 0.714–1.703] and 1.0% vs 1.5%; OR, 0.655 [95% CI, 0.302–1.417]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Postoperative ketorolac use within 5 days of operative treatment does not considerably increase the rate of nonunion or nonunion revision surgery in operatively treated scaphoid fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic III</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100848"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145265303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Biohacking is a term used to describe people making changes to their bodies to improve their well-being. This includes the implantation of radiofrequency identification implants. This technology for wireless communication is already incorporated into our daily lives as in the use of contactless payment and badges to open doors. Since the first radiofrequency identification implantation in a human in 1998, the possibilities of this technology have dramatically increased, and the number of persons that have been chipped is growing. The hand seems to be the most popular body part to implant these chips because it can easily be positioned close to a reader. Currently, implantation is typically not performed in a medical environment. However, implantation of these devices in humans can result in complications, such as infection and tendon attrition, and the relevant safety implications have not been extensively studied. The scope of this review was to inform the hand surgeon community about the existence of these implants, why they are used, and to open the debate about the possible future role of the hand surgeon in safely implanting these devices and dealing with possible complications.
{"title":"Biohacking and Chip Implantation in the Human Hand: An Introduction","authors":"Ward Eerens MD , Pieter Caekebeke MD, PhD , Joris Duerinckx MD PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100853","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100853","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biohacking is a term used to describe people making changes to their bodies to improve their well-being. This includes the implantation of radiofrequency identification implants. This technology for wireless communication is already incorporated into our daily lives as in the use of contactless payment and badges to open doors. Since the first radiofrequency identification implantation in a human in 1998, the possibilities of this technology have dramatically increased, and the number of persons that have been chipped is growing. The hand seems to be the most popular body part to implant these chips because it can easily be positioned close to a reader. Currently, implantation is typically not performed in a medical environment. However, implantation of these devices in humans can result in complications, such as infection and tendon attrition, and the relevant safety implications have not been extensively studied. The scope of this review was to inform the hand surgeon community about the existence of these implants, why they are used, and to open the debate about the possible future role of the hand surgeon in safely implanting these devices and dealing with possible complications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100853"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145266615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-06DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100837
Christopher M. Dussik MD , Amy Phan MD , Akhil Dondapati MD , Jeffrey Coombs MD , Danielle Wilbur MD , Ronald Gonzalez DO , Constantinos Ketonis MD, PhD
Purpose
The management of hand osteoarthritis is a cornerstone of hand surgery practice. Corticosteroid injections and surgical interventions form the mainstay of treatment for those patients with symptoms recalcitrant to less-invasive measures. Health care disparities have been increasingly recognized, particularly regarding variations in pain management. This study aimed to determine whether such disparities exist across different racial and ethnic groups in the treatment of hand osteoarthritis.
Methods
We used the TriNetX database to evaluate patients diagnosed with hand osteoarthritis between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2024. Diagnostic and billing codes were used to identify patients, assess overall health care utilization postdiagnosis, and gauge the use of corticosteroid injections and surgical intervention across different demographics. Outcomes were stratified based on racial and ethnic identification. Matching was performed to mitigate risk for confounding. Odds ratios were used to describe differences in the probability of receiving treatment across groups of interest.
Results
A total of 896,636 patients diagnosed with hand osteoarthritis were identified. Non-Hispanic White patients had nearly twice the odds of undergoing corticosteroid injections and demonstrated consistently higher rates of surgical treatment compared with minority populations across unmatched analyses. After matching for demographic and comorbidity variables, these disparities largely persisted despite similar overall health care utilization.
Conclusions
Minority demographics have lower odds of receiving corticosteroid injections for the treatment of hand osteoarthritis. Similarly, these groups undergo surgical management at considerably lower rates. These findings highlight the persistent disparities in treatment faced by underrepresented groups and underscore the critical importance of considering social determinants of health in the management of upper extremity conditions.
{"title":"Underutilization of Hand Corticosteroid Injections and Arthroplasty for Minority Demographics","authors":"Christopher M. Dussik MD , Amy Phan MD , Akhil Dondapati MD , Jeffrey Coombs MD , Danielle Wilbur MD , Ronald Gonzalez DO , Constantinos Ketonis MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100837","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100837","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The management of hand osteoarthritis is a cornerstone of hand surgery practice. Corticosteroid injections and surgical interventions form the mainstay of treatment for those patients with symptoms recalcitrant to less-invasive measures. Health care disparities have been increasingly recognized, particularly regarding variations in pain management. This study aimed to determine whether such disparities exist across different racial and ethnic groups in the treatment of hand osteoarthritis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used the TriNetX database to evaluate patients diagnosed with hand osteoarthritis between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2024. Diagnostic and billing codes were used to identify patients, assess overall health care utilization postdiagnosis, and gauge the use of corticosteroid injections and surgical intervention across different demographics. Outcomes were stratified based on racial and ethnic identification. Matching was performed to mitigate risk for confounding. Odds ratios were used to describe differences in the probability of receiving treatment across groups of interest.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 896,636 patients diagnosed with hand osteoarthritis were identified. Non-Hispanic White patients had nearly twice the odds of undergoing corticosteroid injections and demonstrated consistently higher rates of surgical treatment compared with minority populations across unmatched analyses. After matching for demographic and comorbidity variables, these disparities largely persisted despite similar overall health care utilization.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Minority demographics have lower odds of receiving corticosteroid injections for the treatment of hand osteoarthritis. Similarly, these groups undergo surgical management at considerably lower rates. These findings highlight the persistent disparities in treatment faced by underrepresented groups and underscore the critical importance of considering social determinants of health in the management of upper extremity conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Prognosis IIC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100837"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145265304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-06DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100857
Joanne Y. Zhou MD , Hubert Tuyishime BA , Jeffrey Yao MD
Triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injuries are a common cause of ulnar-sided wrist pain and may progress to persistent pain, instability of the distal radioulnar joint, and arthritis if left untreated. Diagnosis and management of these injuries requires a nuanced understanding of features pertinent to the clinical presentation, imaging, and arthroscopic findings for accurate management. Arthroscopic-assisted repair techniques have revolutionized surgical management, providing detailed visualization and facilitating the repair of TFCC injuries and associated pathologies with minimally invasive techniques. In this review, we discuss the anatomy of the TFCC, history and examination of ulnar-sided pathology, imaging findings, classification schemes, and surgical techniques for treatment of TFCC injuries. We also touch on pearls and pitfalls of the techniques, complications, and results of treatment.
{"title":"Arthroscopic-Assisted Repair of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex","authors":"Joanne Y. Zhou MD , Hubert Tuyishime BA , Jeffrey Yao MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100857","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100857","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injuries are a common cause of ulnar-sided wrist pain and may progress to persistent pain, instability of the distal radioulnar joint, and arthritis if left untreated. Diagnosis and management of these injuries requires a nuanced understanding of features pertinent to the clinical presentation, imaging, and arthroscopic findings for accurate management. Arthroscopic-assisted repair techniques have revolutionized surgical management, providing detailed visualization and facilitating the repair of TFCC injuries and associated pathologies with minimally invasive techniques. In this review, we discuss the anatomy of the TFCC, history and examination of ulnar-sided pathology, imaging findings, classification schemes, and surgical techniques for treatment of TFCC injuries. We also touch on pearls and pitfalls of the techniques, complications, and results of treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100857"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145266239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-06DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100859
James D. Spratt MD , Ashley Mehl MD , Gary M. Lourie MD
Purpose
Flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tendinitis is an uncommon but important cause of volar radial wrist pain that can be a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. We present a series of patients with FCR tendinitis managed successfully with an algorithm developed by the senior author.
Methods
A retrospective review of patients treated for FCR tendinitis at a hand practice was performed. The percent of the FCR rupture, determined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperative confirmation, determined specific treatment. Patients with <50% rupture on MRI were treated conservatively. Surgery was indicated if this failed to yield relief or MRI suggested >50% rupture. On intraoperative examination, patients with <50% rupture underwent tenosynovectomy and excision of trapezial osteophytes. Patients with >50% rupture underwent an FCR-sacrificing procedure. Patient-reported outcomes, including severity of pain with activities of daily living and ability to return to previous levels of activity, were obtained.
Results
Sixteen patients were treated for FCR tendinitis. Five were treated conservatively, with complete relief of symptoms and return to full activity without sequelae in three of five cases. Four of the 11 surgical patients were found to have <50% of tendon rupture and underwent an FCR-sparing procedure. The remaining seven patients had >50% tendon involvement, which required an FCR-sacrificing procedure. All surgical patients achieved satisfactory results in both functional and clinical outcomes.
Conclusions
This series demonstrates acceptable patient outcomes using the described FCR algorithm, using 50% FCR involvement as a benchmark.
{"title":"Flexor Carpi Radialis Tendinitis to Rupture: A Case Series and Algorithm","authors":"James D. Spratt MD , Ashley Mehl MD , Gary M. Lourie MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100859","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100859","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tendinitis is an uncommon but important cause of volar radial wrist pain that can be a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. We present a series of patients with FCR tendinitis managed successfully with an algorithm developed by the senior author.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review of patients treated for FCR tendinitis at a hand practice was performed. The percent of the FCR rupture, determined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperative confirmation, determined specific treatment. Patients with <50% rupture on MRI were treated conservatively. Surgery was indicated if this failed to yield relief or MRI suggested >50% rupture. On intraoperative examination, patients with <50% rupture underwent tenosynovectomy and excision of trapezial osteophytes. Patients with >50% rupture underwent an FCR-sacrificing procedure. Patient-reported outcomes, including severity of pain with activities of daily living and ability to return to previous levels of activity, were obtained.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixteen patients were treated for FCR tendinitis. Five were treated conservatively, with complete relief of symptoms and return to full activity without sequelae in three of five cases. Four of the 11 surgical patients were found to have <50% of tendon rupture and underwent an FCR-sparing procedure. The remaining seven patients had >50% tendon involvement, which required an FCR-sacrificing procedure. All surgical patients achieved satisfactory results in both functional and clinical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This series demonstrates acceptable patient outcomes using the described FCR algorithm, using 50% FCR involvement as a benchmark.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Level IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100859"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145266614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-23DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100830
Angel X. Xiao MD, MSE , Brian Chen BS , Christopher Chiong BA , Nicholas H. Lee , Igor Immerman MD , Sakura Kinjo MD
Purpose
Virtual reality (VR) is increasingly recognized as a complementary tool to address pain and anxiety. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of VR for the management of pain and anxiety in patients undergoing minor hand surgery.
Methods
Patients undergoing outpatient hand surgery were randomized to VR or control groups. In addition to the standard anesthetic protocol, the VR group received a VR experience as part of their preoperative care. Patient anxiety and pain scores were collected using the Numerical Visual Analog Anxiety Scale and Numerical Rating Scale, respectively. In addition, we recorded changes in patient hemodynamics and any additional medication doses required to manage pain or anxiety.
Results
Forty-one patients (21 VR and 20 control) were enrolled. There were no differences in reported pain or anxiety scores before, during, or after surgery. There was no difference in vital signs or recovery times. Patients in the VR groups received less additional midazolam (0.4 mg vs 1.2 mg) and fentanyl (10 mcg vs 27.4 mcg) compared with patients in the control group. In a multivariable model, VR use remained the only significant predictor for no required midazolam. Eighty-five percent of patients believed that the use of VR positively impacted their surgical experience. As a result of the VR experience, 78% believed that their anxiety decreased and 61.1% believed that their pain decreased.
Conclusions
Although patient pain and anxiety levels between the VR and non-VR groups were similar, the VR group required significantly less midazolam and fentanyl. Moreover, VR use was the only predictor of not requiring midazolam administration during surgery. Patient satisfaction was high with VR usage. VR implementation during minor hand surgery is a viable option to improve patient experience.
Type of study/Level of evidence
Therapeutic IIB.
目的虚拟现实(VR)越来越被认为是解决疼痛和焦虑的辅助工具。我们进行了一项随机对照试验,以评估VR治疗手部小手术患者疼痛和焦虑的有效性。方法门诊手部手术患者随机分为VR组和对照组。除了标准麻醉方案外,VR组还接受了VR体验作为术前护理的一部分。分别使用数值视觉模拟焦虑量表和数值评定量表收集患者焦虑和疼痛评分。此外,我们还记录了患者血流动力学的变化以及控制疼痛或焦虑所需的任何额外药物剂量。结果共纳入41例患者,其中虚拟现实患者21例,对照组20例。在手术前、手术中或手术后报告的疼痛或焦虑评分没有差异。两组在生命体征和恢复时间上没有差异。与对照组患者相比,VR组患者额外接受的咪达唑仑(0.4 mg vs 1.2 mg)和芬太尼(10 mcg vs 27.4 mcg)较少。在多变量模型中,VR使用仍然是不需要咪达唑仑的唯一重要预测因素。85%的患者认为VR的使用对他们的手术体验产生了积极的影响。由于VR体验,78%的人认为他们的焦虑减轻了,61.1%的人认为他们的疼痛减轻了。结论虽然VR组和非VR组患者的疼痛和焦虑水平相似,但VR组对咪达唑仑和芬太尼的需求明显减少。此外,VR的使用是手术期间不需要咪达唑仑的唯一预测因素。患者对VR的使用满意度很高。在小手手术中实施虚拟现实技术是改善患者体验的可行选择。研究类型/证据水平:治疗性IIB。
{"title":"Digital Doses: Virtual Reality Use for Perioperative Pain and Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Hand Surgery","authors":"Angel X. Xiao MD, MSE , Brian Chen BS , Christopher Chiong BA , Nicholas H. Lee , Igor Immerman MD , Sakura Kinjo MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100830","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100830","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Virtual reality (VR) is increasingly recognized as a complementary tool to address pain and anxiety. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of VR for the management of pain and anxiety in patients undergoing minor hand surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients undergoing outpatient hand surgery were randomized to VR or control groups. In addition to the standard anesthetic protocol, the VR group received a VR experience as part of their preoperative care. Patient anxiety and pain scores were collected using the Numerical Visual Analog Anxiety Scale and Numerical Rating Scale, respectively. In addition, we recorded changes in patient hemodynamics and any additional medication doses required to manage pain or anxiety.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-one patients (21 VR and 20 control) were enrolled. There were no differences in reported pain or anxiety scores before, during, or after surgery. There was no difference in vital signs or recovery times. Patients in the VR groups received less additional midazolam (0.4 mg vs 1.2 mg) and fentanyl (10 mcg vs 27.4 mcg) compared with patients in the control group. In a multivariable model, VR use remained the only significant predictor for no required midazolam. Eighty-five percent of patients believed that the use of VR positively impacted their surgical experience. As a result of the VR experience, 78% believed that their anxiety decreased and 61.1% believed that their pain decreased.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although patient pain and anxiety levels between the VR and non-VR groups were similar, the VR group required significantly less midazolam and fentanyl. Moreover, VR use was the only predictor of not requiring midazolam administration during surgery. Patient satisfaction was high with VR usage. VR implementation during minor hand surgery is a viable option to improve patient experience.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/Level of evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic IIB.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100830"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145105551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-20DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100831
Calista Stevens BA , Mehreen Pasha BS , Dashun Liu MS , Andrew Block MD , Anthony Parrino MD , Craig Rodner MD
Purpose
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care comes with increasing concerns about the use and integrity of the information it generates. Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) 3.5, Google Gemini, and Bing Copilot are free AI chatbot platforms that may be used for answering medical questions and disseminating medical information. Given that carpal tunnel syndrome accounts for 90% of all neuropathies, it is important to understand the accuracy of the information patients may be receiving. The purpose of this study is to determine the use and accuracy of responses generated by ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Bing Copilot in answering frequently asked questions about carpal tunnel syndrome.
Methods
Two independent authors scored responses using the DISCERN tool. DISCERN consists of 15 questions assessing health information on a five-point scale, with total scores ranging from 15 to 75 points. Then, a two-factor analysis of variance was conducted, with scorer and chatbot type as the factors.
Results
One-way analysis of variance revealed no significant difference in DISCERN scores among the three chatbots. The chatbots each scored in the “fair” range, with means of 45 for ChatGPT, 48 for Bing Copilot, and 46 for Google Gemini. The average Journal of the American Medical Association score for ChatGPT and Google Gemini surpassed that of Bing Copilot, with averages of 2.3, 2.3, and 1.8, respectively.
Conclusions
ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Bing Copilot platforms generated relatively reliable answers for potential patient questions about carpal tunnel syndrome. However, users should continue to be aware of the shortcomings of the information provided, given the lack of citations, potential for misconstrued information, and perpetuated biases that inherently come with using such platforms. Future studies should explore the response quality for less common orthopedic pathologies and assess patient perceptions of response readability to determine the value of AI as a patient resource across the medical field.
Type of study/level of evidence
Cross-sectional study V
随着人工智能(AI)在医疗保健领域的兴起,人们越来越关注其产生的信息的使用和完整性。ChatGPT 3.5、谷歌Gemini和Bing Copilot是免费的人工智能聊天机器人平台,可用于回答医疗问题和传播医疗信息。鉴于腕管综合征占所有神经病变的90%,了解患者可能接收到的信息的准确性是很重要的。本研究的目的是确定ChatGPT、谷歌Gemini和Bing Copilot在回答有关腕管综合征的常见问题时所产生的反应的使用和准确性。方法两位独立作者使用DISCERN工具对回答进行评分。辨别由15个问题组成,以五分制评估健康信息,总分从15到75分不等。然后,以得分者和聊天机器人类型为影响因素,进行双因素方差分析。结果单因素方差分析显示,三种聊天机器人在DISCERN得分上无显著差异。每个聊天机器人的得分都在“公平”范围内,ChatGPT得分为45分,Bing副驾驶得分为48分,b谷歌双子座得分为46分。ChatGPT和谷歌Gemini在《美国医学协会杂志》(Journal of American Medical Association)上的平均得分分别为2.3、2.3和1.8,超过了Bing Copilot。结论schatgpt、谷歌Gemini和Bing Copilot平台为潜在患者关于腕管综合征的问题提供了相对可靠的答案。然而,用户应该继续意识到所提供信息的缺点,因为缺乏引用,信息可能被误解,以及使用此类平台固有的长期偏见。未来的研究应该探索不太常见的骨科病理的反应质量,并评估患者对反应可读性的看法,以确定人工智能作为整个医疗领域患者资源的价值。研究类型/证据水平横断面研究
{"title":"A Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Platforms in the Utility of Answering Frequently Asked Questions About Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Calista Stevens BA , Mehreen Pasha BS , Dashun Liu MS , Andrew Block MD , Anthony Parrino MD , Craig Rodner MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100831","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100831","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care comes with increasing concerns about the use and integrity of the information it generates. Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) 3.5, Google Gemini, and Bing Copilot are free AI chatbot platforms that may be used for answering medical questions and disseminating medical information. Given that carpal tunnel syndrome accounts for 90% of all neuropathies, it is important to understand the accuracy of the information patients may be receiving. The purpose of this study is to determine the use and accuracy of responses generated by ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Bing Copilot in answering frequently asked questions about carpal tunnel syndrome.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two independent authors scored responses using the DISCERN tool. DISCERN consists of 15 questions assessing health information on a five-point scale, with total scores ranging from 15 to 75 points. Then, a two-factor analysis of variance was conducted, with scorer and chatbot type as the factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One-way analysis of variance revealed no significant difference in DISCERN scores among the three chatbots. The chatbots each scored in the “fair” range, with means of 45 for ChatGPT, 48 for Bing Copilot, and 46 for Google Gemini. The average Journal of the American Medical Association score for ChatGPT and Google Gemini surpassed that of Bing Copilot, with averages of 2.3, 2.3, and 1.8, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Bing Copilot platforms generated relatively reliable answers for potential patient questions about carpal tunnel syndrome. However, users should continue to be aware of the shortcomings of the information provided, given the lack of citations, potential for misconstrued information, and perpetuated biases that inherently come with using such platforms. Future studies should explore the response quality for less common orthopedic pathologies and assess patient perceptions of response readability to determine the value of AI as a patient resource across the medical field.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Cross-sectional study V</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100831"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145095981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-19DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100806
Nicholas I. Pilla MD , R. Cole Turner MD , Daniella R. Mora BS , Alex Mafdali MD , Fady Attalla BS , Liannys Capote BS , Md Ashfaq Ahmed MS, PhD , E. Anne Ouellette MD, MBA
Purpose
Persistent ulnar-sided wrist pain, often because of triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears, can lead to instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) and the ulnocarpal joint (UCJ). Although the TFCC's role in stabilizing the DRUJ is well established, its contribution to UCJ stability has gained increasing recognition. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes of combined Herbert Sling and suture repair for (UCJ) instability secondary to TFCC tears.
Methods
Eighty-eight patients (91 wrists) with TFCC tears and UCJ instability, unresponsive to nonsurgical management, underwent combined Herbert sling (HS) and suture repair. The HS technique stabilizes both the DRUJ and UCJ by advancing an extensor retinaculum flap to the radius. Suture repair for the TFCC was performed using a commercially available all-inside-repair device. Postoperative care involved immobilization followed by structured rehabilitation. Outcomes were assessed at 6 months and 1 year and included visual analog scale pain scores, range of motion, and supination test results.
Results
Visual analog scale pain scores improved considerably from 4.5 before surgery to 1.1 at 6 months, with sustained improvement at 1 year. The flexion-extension arc decreased from 133° before surgery to 113° at 6 months but returned to 135° at 1 year. The pronation-supination arc decreased slightly from 177° to 171° at 6 months, with full recovery by 1 year. Supination testing showed a considerable improvement in UCJ stability, with 92% of wrists stable at 6 months and 87% stable at 1 year. Four wrists experienced recurrent instability between 6 months and 1 year.
Conclusions
The combined HS and suture repair effectively restores stability to both the DRUJ and UCJ in patients with TFCC-related ulnocarpal instability, considerably reducing pain and preserving range of motion. This technique provides a promising approach to the treatment of ulnocarpal instability while minimizing tissue disruption.
{"title":"Extensor Retinaculum Capsulorrhaphy and Suture Repair for Ulnocarpal and Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability: One-Year Results","authors":"Nicholas I. Pilla MD , R. Cole Turner MD , Daniella R. Mora BS , Alex Mafdali MD , Fady Attalla BS , Liannys Capote BS , Md Ashfaq Ahmed MS, PhD , E. Anne Ouellette MD, MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100806","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100806","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Persistent ulnar-sided wrist pain, often because of triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears, can lead to instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) and the ulnocarpal joint (UCJ). Although the TFCC's role in stabilizing the DRUJ is well established, its contribution to UCJ stability has gained increasing recognition. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes of combined Herbert Sling and suture repair for (UCJ) instability secondary to TFCC tears.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eighty-eight patients (91 wrists) with TFCC tears and UCJ instability, unresponsive to nonsurgical management, underwent combined Herbert sling (HS) and suture repair. The HS technique stabilizes both the DRUJ and UCJ by advancing an extensor retinaculum flap to the radius. Suture repair for the TFCC was performed using a commercially available all-inside-repair device. Postoperative care involved immobilization followed by structured rehabilitation. Outcomes were assessed at 6 months and 1 year and included visual analog scale pain scores, range of motion, and supination test results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Visual analog scale pain scores improved considerably from 4.5 before surgery to 1.1 at 6 months, with sustained improvement at 1 year. The flexion-extension arc decreased from 133° before surgery to 113° at 6 months but returned to 135° at 1 year. The pronation-supination arc decreased slightly from 177° to 171° at 6 months, with full recovery by 1 year. Supination testing showed a considerable improvement in UCJ stability, with 92% of wrists stable at 6 months and 87% stable at 1 year. Four wrists experienced recurrent instability between 6 months and 1 year.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The combined HS and suture repair effectively restores stability to both the DRUJ and UCJ in patients with TFCC-related ulnocarpal instability, considerably reducing pain and preserving range of motion. This technique provides a promising approach to the treatment of ulnocarpal instability while minimizing tissue disruption.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100806"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145096023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-19DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100824
Clay B. Thames BA , Evan Bowen BS , Greg Vance BE , Bradley Hathaway BA , Kacy Benedict MD , Mark Dodson MD , Marc Walker MD
Purpose
Provocative maneuvers are frequently employed by hand surgeons to evaluate common hand pathologies. Although prior studies have evaluated the efficacy of individual maneuvers independently, to date, no studies have been performed evaluating the concordance between nonsurgeon-administered Tinel, Eichhoff, Finkelstein, and carpometacarpal Grind test and attending hand surgeon diagnoses in a general hand clinic population.
Methods
A prospective cohort study was performed on new patients presenting to the hand clinic. All four provocative maneuvers were performed on each patient. Positive versus negative results were recorded by a student and compared with the final clinical diagnoses by fellowship-trained, board-certified hand surgeons retrospectively. Descriptive statistics and χ2 analysis were performed.
Results
A total of 93 patients were enrolled in the study. The concordance between the nonsurgeon examination and the hand surgeon examination was analyzed. Analyses showed that Tinel test, Grind test, and Eichhoff test were meaningfully associated with their respective hand pathologies, whereas Finkelstein test was not. Among the tests evaluated, the Grind test showed the greatest concordance, and the Tinel test offered high concordance while also limiting false-positive examinations, even between a nonsurgeon and a hand specialist.
Conclusions
This prospective study revealed varied concordance among maneuvers. The Grind test, Tinel test, and Eichhoff test demonstrated efficacy in identifying carpometacarpal arthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, and de Quervain tenosynovitis, respectively. Although these tests were not designed for screening, these maneuvers may support early hypothesis generation when evaluating undifferentiated upper-extremity complaints in the clinic.
{"title":"Reliability of Provocative Maneuvers for Hand Pathologies: Concordance Between Nonspecialist and Specialist Assessments in a General Clinic Setting","authors":"Clay B. Thames BA , Evan Bowen BS , Greg Vance BE , Bradley Hathaway BA , Kacy Benedict MD , Mark Dodson MD , Marc Walker MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100824","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100824","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Provocative maneuvers are frequently employed by hand surgeons to evaluate common hand pathologies. Although prior studies have evaluated the efficacy of individual maneuvers independently, to date, no studies have been performed evaluating the concordance between nonsurgeon-administered Tinel, Eichhoff, Finkelstein, and carpometacarpal Grind test and attending hand surgeon diagnoses in a general hand clinic population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective cohort study was performed on new patients presenting to the hand clinic. All four provocative maneuvers were performed on each patient. Positive versus negative results were recorded by a student and compared with the final clinical diagnoses by fellowship-trained, board-certified hand surgeons retrospectively. Descriptive statistics and χ<sup>2</sup> analysis were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 93 patients were enrolled in the study. The concordance between the nonsurgeon examination and the hand surgeon examination was analyzed. Analyses showed that Tinel test, Grind test, and Eichhoff test were meaningfully associated with their respective hand pathologies, whereas Finkelstein test was not. Among the tests evaluated, the Grind test showed the greatest concordance, and the Tinel test offered high concordance while also limiting false-positive examinations, even between a nonsurgeon and a hand specialist.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This prospective study revealed varied concordance among maneuvers. The Grind test, Tinel test, and Eichhoff test demonstrated efficacy in identifying carpometacarpal arthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, and de Quervain tenosynovitis, respectively. Although these tests were not designed for screening, these maneuvers may support early hypothesis generation when evaluating undifferentiated upper-extremity complaints in the clinic.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Diagnostic IIb.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100824"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145095980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-18DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100833
Rasa Zhukauskas MD , Brandon S. Smetana MD , Adam B. Strohl MD , Sunishka M. Wimalawansa MD, MBA , Eitan Melamed MD , Amy M. Moore MD , Fraser J. Leversedge MD , Youssra Marjoua MD , Bauback Safa MD
Purpose
Nerve damage because of acute traumatic lacerations is challenging to assess and is typically evaluated using loupes or an operating microscope. However, defining the zone of injury clinically is limited to evaluating the epineurium and/or transected nerve ends for visible injury, with tactile changes corresponding with nerve damage not evident in the acute setting. During surgical nerve repair or reconstruction, adequate debridement of the damaged tissue is essential, as fascicular health influences the regenerative potential of the nerve. This study used a novel high-resolution imaging method to characterize the extent of nerve damage resulting from 3 common mechanisms of traumatic lacerations.
Methods
Twelve human upper extremity cadaveric specimens were used to simulate common injuries using a knife, broken glass, or table saw in flexor tendon zones II or V. The distance of nerve damage measured from the transected end was visually estimated by experienced peripheral nerve surgeons under loupe magnification. The length of nerve damage was measured radiographically using micro-computed tomography and then compared with visually estimated damage.
Results
Radiographic image analysis revealed fascicular disruption extending proximally and distally from the transection, which was underestimated by visual assessment 9.5 mm on average in knife injuries, 7.8 mm in broken glass injuries, and 12.1 mm in table saw injuries. The extent of radiographic damage was similar in proximal and distal nerves, and in knife and broken glass lacerations, but most extensive in table saw lacerations.
Conclusions
Nerve damage was greatest in table saw lacerations. Radiographic imaging showed fascicular damage extending beyond the surgeon’s visual assessment of epineural damage, indicating that the internal damage to nerves from traumatic lacerations was underappreciated by surgeons. The impact this underestimated damage has on regenerative potential of an injured nerve requires further investigation.
{"title":"More Than Epineurium Deep: Characterizing Peripheral Nerve Damage Using High-Resolution Micro-Computed Tomography for Simulated Peripheral Nerve Lacerations","authors":"Rasa Zhukauskas MD , Brandon S. Smetana MD , Adam B. Strohl MD , Sunishka M. Wimalawansa MD, MBA , Eitan Melamed MD , Amy M. Moore MD , Fraser J. Leversedge MD , Youssra Marjoua MD , Bauback Safa MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100833","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100833","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Nerve damage because of acute traumatic lacerations is challenging to assess and is typically evaluated using loupes or an operating microscope. However, defining the zone of injury clinically is limited to evaluating the epineurium and/or transected nerve ends for visible injury, with tactile changes corresponding with nerve damage not evident in the acute setting. During surgical nerve repair or reconstruction, adequate debridement of the damaged tissue is essential, as fascicular health influences the regenerative potential of the nerve. This study used a novel high-resolution imaging method to characterize the extent of nerve damage resulting from 3 common mechanisms of traumatic lacerations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twelve human upper extremity cadaveric specimens were used to simulate common injuries using a knife, broken glass, or table saw in flexor tendon zones II or V. The distance of nerve damage measured from the transected end was visually estimated by experienced peripheral nerve surgeons under loupe magnification. The length of nerve damage was measured radiographically using micro-computed tomography and then compared with visually estimated damage.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Radiographic image analysis revealed fascicular disruption extending proximally and distally from the transection, which was underestimated by visual assessment 9.5 mm on average in knife injuries, 7.8 mm in broken glass injuries, and 12.1 mm in table saw injuries. The extent of radiographic damage was similar in proximal and distal nerves, and in knife and broken glass lacerations, but most extensive in table saw lacerations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Nerve damage was greatest in table saw lacerations. Radiographic imaging showed fascicular damage extending beyond the surgeon’s visual assessment of epineural damage, indicating that the internal damage to nerves from traumatic lacerations was underappreciated by surgeons. The impact this underestimated damage has on regenerative potential of an injured nerve requires further investigation.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/Level of evidence</h3><div>Diagnostic V.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100833"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145096027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}