Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/04
Izvorni znanstveni rad, Stilometrijska Analiza Slovenske, Pripovjedne Književnosti, DO Prve, Izvorne Slovenske Priče
ven method, which, however, has certain limitations. Stylometry is a text-immanent method that does not provide absolutely valid answers or general findings about style. In addition, the definition of measurable characteristics and the comparison method used remain in the domain of the researchers and their familiarity with the material. However, it allows a simultaneous overview of a large collection of texts and hence reaches beyond the established canon incorporating trivial literature and translated literature as an important segment of national literature, especially in its early periods. Stylometric analysis identifies text patterns, which can either be confirmed by qualitative research or can indicate the necessity for a new approach to traditional research. The visualization of results of the stylometric analysis of Slovenian narrative literature from the first half of the seventeenth century to the first original Slovenian narrative in 1836 shows the development of Slovenian narrative literature by period, with identifiable hallmarks of certain authors, and within individual periods and genres. Certain links indicate a need for further research.
{"title":"Stilometrijska analiza slovenske pripovjedne književnosti do prve izvorne slovenske priče","authors":"Izvorni znanstveni rad, Stilometrijska Analiza Slovenske, Pripovjedne Književnosti, DO Prve, Izvorne Slovenske Priče","doi":"10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/04","url":null,"abstract":"ven method, which, however, has certain limitations. Stylometry is a text-immanent method that does not provide absolutely valid answers or general findings about style. In addition, the definition of measurable characteristics and the comparison method used remain in the domain of the researchers and their familiarity with the material. However, it allows a simultaneous overview of a large collection of texts and hence reaches beyond the established canon incorporating trivial literature and translated literature as an important segment of national literature, especially in its early periods. Stylometric analysis identifies text patterns, which can either be confirmed by qualitative research or can indicate the necessity for a new approach to traditional research. The visualization of results of the stylometric analysis of Slovenian narrative literature from the first half of the seventeenth century to the first original Slovenian narrative in 1836 shows the development of Slovenian narrative literature by period, with identifiable hallmarks of certain authors, and within individual periods and genres. Certain links indicate a need for further research.","PeriodicalId":371506,"journal":{"name":"Umjetnost riječi: časopis za znanost o književnosti, izvedbenoj umjetnosti i filmu","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121033971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/06
{"title":"Slovenska prostorna znanost o književnosti i književna interpretacija","authors":"","doi":"10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/06","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":371506,"journal":{"name":"Umjetnost riječi: časopis za znanost o književnosti, izvedbenoj umjetnosti i filmu","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116369301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/03
Izvorni znanstveni rad, Š. BlažKAV, Promjena Književnopovijesnoga, Narativa O Drugoj, Polovici, Stoljeća Primjer Interpretacije, Pripovjedne Proze, Simona Jenka, Dodatak ZA Objašnjenje, Simon Jenko, Jenka ističemo, prije svega Henricha
Tilka , and Jeprški učitelj/The Teacher from Jeprca ). Jenko’s prose is analysed in greater detail by Matjaž Kmecl (1973) and France Bernik (1956). The critics interpret one of the stories, Spomini ( Memories ), from a completely different standpoint: Kmecl interprets it as the product of Jenko’s romantic bourgeois ideology influenced by European Romantic movements, and Bernik as the culmination of Jenko’s loyalty to realism or even as “counter-Romanticism”. Since the critics’ understanding of what romantic and realist implies is epistemologically so different, it seems unproductive to simply oppose their views. Hence, this paper contextualises the critics’ implicit conceptions of romantic and realist with two distinct literary historical traditions and narratives from the second half of the 19th century.
Tilka和Jeprški u itelj/来自Jeprca的教师)。matjajev Kmecl(1973)和France Bernik(1956)对Jenko的散文作了更详细的分析。评论家们从一个完全不同的角度解释了其中一个故事，《回忆》:Kmecl将其解释为Jenko受欧洲浪漫主义运动影响的浪漫资产阶级意识形态的产物，而Bernik则将其解释为Jenko对现实主义的忠诚的高潮，甚至是“反浪漫主义”。由于批评家对浪漫主义和现实主义的理解在认识论上是如此不同，简单地反对他们的观点似乎是徒劳的。因此，本文以19世纪下半叶两种截然不同的文学历史传统和叙事为背景，对批评家对浪漫主义和现实主义的含蓄概念进行了分析。
{"title":"Promjena književnopovijesnoga narativa o drugoj polovici 19. stoljeća: Primjer interpretacije pripovjedne proze Simona Jenka","authors":"Izvorni znanstveni rad, Š. BlažKAV, Promjena Književnopovijesnoga, Narativa O Drugoj, Polovici, Stoljeća Primjer Interpretacije, Pripovjedne Proze, Simona Jenka, Dodatak ZA Objašnjenje, Simon Jenko, Jenka ističemo, prije svega Henricha","doi":"10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/03","url":null,"abstract":"Tilka , and Jeprški učitelj/The Teacher from Jeprca ). Jenko’s prose is analysed in greater detail by Matjaž Kmecl (1973) and France Bernik (1956). The critics interpret one of the stories, Spomini ( Memories ), from a completely different standpoint: Kmecl interprets it as the product of Jenko’s romantic bourgeois ideology influenced by European Romantic movements, and Bernik as the culmination of Jenko’s loyalty to realism or even as “counter-Romanticism”. Since the critics’ understanding of what romantic and realist implies is epistemologically so different, it seems unproductive to simply oppose their views. Hence, this paper contextualises the critics’ implicit conceptions of romantic and realist with two distinct literary historical traditions and narratives from the second half of the 19th century.","PeriodicalId":371506,"journal":{"name":"Umjetnost riječi: časopis za znanost o književnosti, izvedbenoj umjetnosti i filmu","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125102151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/07
Pregledni rad, Č. AlojzijaZUPANSOSI, Pitanja Književne, Interpretacije I Prijedlog, ZA Tumačenje, I. Vrednovanje, Romana Ivana Cankara
ISSUES OF LITERARY INTERPRETATION AND A PROPOSAL FOR INTERPRETING AND EVALUATING IVAN CANKAR’S NOVELS Reading, interpretation and analysis are closely connected in contemporary literary interpretation. Their syncretism is also influenced by narratology, which today acts as a useful theoretical mediator between (narrative) structures and interpretative approaches. Thus, contemporary literary interpretation includes two levels (assembling reference frames and filling the gaps) with several processes, and four elements, i.e., the author, the text, the reader and the context, the most important of which is the intention of the text. Interpretations of Cankar’s novels differ already on the first level of literary interpretation, mainly due to digressive narrative and a high degree of emotionality. For the future second level of interpretation of Cankar’s novels, the paper suggests the following elements: moral perspectivism, taboos or stereotypes, autobiography, the relationship between the narrator and the character, in other words the use of the latest approaches, such as e.g., narrative empathy, narratological analysis of poetics and postfeminist approaches.
{"title":"Pitanja književne interpretacije i prijedlog za tumačenje i vrednovanje romana Ivana Cankara","authors":"Pregledni rad, Č. AlojzijaZUPANSOSI, Pitanja Književne, Interpretacije I Prijedlog, ZA Tumačenje, I. Vrednovanje, Romana Ivana Cankara","doi":"10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/07","url":null,"abstract":"ISSUES OF LITERARY INTERPRETATION AND A PROPOSAL FOR INTERPRETING AND EVALUATING IVAN CANKAR’S NOVELS Reading, interpretation and analysis are closely connected in contemporary literary interpretation. Their syncretism is also influenced by narratology, which today acts as a useful theoretical mediator between (narrative) structures and interpretative approaches. Thus, contemporary literary interpretation includes two levels (assembling reference frames and filling the gaps) with several processes, and four elements, i.e., the author, the text, the reader and the context, the most important of which is the intention of the text. Interpretations of Cankar’s novels differ already on the first level of literary interpretation, mainly due to digressive narrative and a high degree of emotionality. For the future second level of interpretation of Cankar’s novels, the paper suggests the following elements: moral perspectivism, taboos or stereotypes, autobiography, the relationship between the narrator and the character, in other words the use of the latest approaches, such as e.g., narrative empathy, narratological analysis of poetics and postfeminist approaches.","PeriodicalId":371506,"journal":{"name":"Umjetnost riječi: časopis za znanost o književnosti, izvedbenoj umjetnosti i filmu","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122040679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/08
{"title":"Ljubav, grad i rat. Analiza mikrrostrukture (close reading) na primjeru ratnih romana Drage Jančara","authors":"","doi":"10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/08","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":371506,"journal":{"name":"Umjetnost riječi: časopis za znanost o književnosti, izvedbenoj umjetnosti i filmu","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117259615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/01
Izvorni Znanstveni Rad, Č. AleksanderBJEL, Osnovna Pitanja, I. Ograničenja
Hirsch’s intentionalism claims that the meaning of the text is determined by the author’s intentions and linguistic conventions, so the aim of the interpretation is to discover the author’s meaning. Hypothetical intentionalism (Carroll, Levinson) argues that the meaning of the text is determined by the best hypotheses of ideal readers about the author’s meaning. In the fifth heading, the paper rejects two arguments of anti-intentionalism that a literary work is autonomous and that the aim of literary interpretation should be interpretation of the text. The paper rejects the aesthetic argument by stating that the sole purpose of interpretation is not to show the aesthetic qualities of the work and that there may be other legitimate aims of interpretation. It further rejects the communicative argument that literary works, because of their fictional nature, merely imitate illocutionary speech acts, by offering the opposite argument that not all literature is fiction. Finally, it is argued that the fundamental error of some theoretical discussions is generalization and that intentionalism is acceptable. In conclusion, the acceptability and unacceptability of (anti) intentionalism is decided by the age and type of the text, figures of speech and interests of certain interpretive paradigms.
{"title":"Književna interpretacija: rasprava između intencionalizma i anti-intencionalizma","authors":"Izvorni Znanstveni Rad, Č. AleksanderBJEL, Osnovna Pitanja, I. Ograničenja","doi":"10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/01","url":null,"abstract":"Hirsch’s intentionalism claims that the meaning of the text is determined by the author’s intentions and linguistic conventions, so the aim of the interpretation is to discover the author’s meaning. Hypothetical intentionalism (Carroll, Levinson) argues that the meaning of the text is determined by the best hypotheses of ideal readers about the author’s meaning. In the fifth heading, the paper rejects two arguments of anti-intentionalism that a literary work is autonomous and that the aim of literary interpretation should be interpretation of the text. The paper rejects the aesthetic argument by stating that the sole purpose of interpretation is not to show the aesthetic qualities of the work and that there may be other legitimate aims of interpretation. It further rejects the communicative argument that literary works, because of their fictional nature, merely imitate illocutionary speech acts, by offering the opposite argument that not all literature is fiction. Finally, it is argued that the fundamental error of some theoretical discussions is generalization and that intentionalism is acceptable. In conclusion, the acceptability and unacceptability of (anti) intentionalism is decided by the age and type of the text, figures of speech and interests of certain interpretive paradigms.","PeriodicalId":371506,"journal":{"name":"Umjetnost riječi: časopis za znanost o književnosti, izvedbenoj umjetnosti i filmu","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117091793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/02
Izvorni znanstveni rad, K. BlažPODLESNI, Kako Zvuči, I. I. Dostoevskij, Može Značiti, ZA Znanost, O. Književnosti
The paper confronts two dominant scholarly readings of Dostoevsky in order to re-examine the role that textual analysis plays in contemporary literary studies. In Bakhtin’s reading of Dostoevsky, the main focus is on confronting different voices, perspectives, and valuation accents. The incoherence and polyphony of different discourses are considered as the author’s main literary innovation. In more recent studies, the focus has shifted to the author’s philosophical and religious views, conveyed in a complex literary verbal icon. Instead of choosing one of the two approaches in analysing the role of literary text in Dostoevsky’s works, the paper highlights the interdependence of both aspects as the main feature of his literary writing. The paper shows how crucial this duality is for constitution of Dostoevsky’s literary heroes and for the author himself, and points out this duality as the objective invariant of Dostoevsky’s literary oeuvre. Such an analysis can also shed light on the issues contemporary literary studies encounter in their attempt to make sense of the category of literary text and answer the question of the extent to which literary text can still be the subject of scientific (subject-object) cognition.
{"title":"Kako zvuči i izgleda Dostoevskij (i što to može značiti za znanost o književnosti)","authors":"Izvorni znanstveni rad, K. BlažPODLESNI, Kako Zvuči, I. I. Dostoevskij, Može Značiti, ZA Znanost, O. Književnosti","doi":"10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/02","url":null,"abstract":"The paper confronts two dominant scholarly readings of Dostoevsky in order to re-examine the role that textual analysis plays in contemporary literary studies. In Bakhtin’s reading of Dostoevsky, the main focus is on confronting different voices, perspectives, and valuation accents. The incoherence and polyphony of different discourses are considered as the author’s main literary innovation. In more recent studies, the focus has shifted to the author’s philosophical and religious views, conveyed in a complex literary verbal icon. Instead of choosing one of the two approaches in analysing the role of literary text in Dostoevsky’s works, the paper highlights the interdependence of both aspects as the main feature of his literary writing. The paper shows how crucial this duality is for constitution of Dostoevsky’s literary heroes and for the author himself, and points out this duality as the objective invariant of Dostoevsky’s literary oeuvre. Such an analysis can also shed light on the issues contemporary literary studies encounter in their attempt to make sense of the category of literary text and answer the question of the extent to which literary text can still be the subject of scientific (subject-object) cognition.","PeriodicalId":371506,"journal":{"name":"Umjetnost riječi: časopis za znanost o književnosti, izvedbenoj umjetnosti i filmu","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128972182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：