首页 > 最新文献

Publications最新文献

英文 中文
Scientific Excellence and Publication Patterns: The Winning Applicants of the Bolyai János Research Scholarship in Hungary in 2021 科学卓越与出版模式:2021年匈牙利Bolyai János研究奖学金的获奖申请人
IF 5.2 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-09-06 DOI: 10.3390/publications11030043
Péter Sasvári, Tamás Kaiser, Krisztián Várföldi, Csaba Fasi
The following paper examines some of the publishing habits observed among the winning applicants of the Bolyai János Research Scholarship. As an academic support programme, the Bolyai Research Scholarship forms a bridge between scholars with the title of doctor of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (HAS) and the young generation of researchers with an academic degree. The winning applicants in 2021 were researchers under the age of 45, cooperating with international co-authors, having highly cited publications and showing a continuous publication history of 15 years on average. The scholarship holders come primarily from research centres and universities. The paper argues that the achievements of scholarship holders follow the international patterns of academic excellence and publication as well as the requirements for international cooperation and publishing mainly in open access journals. In doing so, they prefer journals under the umbrella of Elsevier for performing their publication activities; however, there has been a significant increase in those publishing in MDPI journals, recently. The results show that one-third of the applicants had published before and a fifth of them had published in one of the journals of MDPI two months after announcing the list of the winning applicants. At the same time, differences in publication traditions and award systems reveal marked differences in publication strategies and evaluation criteria across fields of science. Based on this, the descriptive statistics presented in this paper contribute to our understanding of the conscious career planning of young scholars in line with international standards.
以下论文考察了Bolyai János研究奖学金获奖申请人的一些出版习惯。作为一项学术支持计划,Bolyai研究奖学金在拥有匈牙利科学院博士头衔的学者和拥有学术学位的年轻一代研究人员之间架起了一座桥梁。2021年的获奖申请者是45岁以下的研究人员,他们与国际合著者合作,拥有被高度引用的出版物,平均连续出版15年。奖学金获得者主要来自研究中心和大学。论文认为,奖学金获得者的成就遵循了学术卓越和发表的国际模式,以及国际合作和主要在开放获取期刊上发表的要求。在这样做的过程中,他们更喜欢爱思唯尔旗下的期刊来开展他们的出版活动;然而,最近在MDPI期刊上发表的论文显著增加。结果显示,三分之一的申请人之前发表过论文,五分之一的人在宣布获奖申请人名单两个月后在MDPI的一家期刊上发表过论文。同时,出版传统和奖励制度的差异揭示了不同科学领域在出版策略和评价标准方面的显著差异。基于此,本文提供的描述性统计数据有助于我们理解年轻学者有意识的职业规划是否符合国际标准。
{"title":"Scientific Excellence and Publication Patterns: The Winning Applicants of the Bolyai János Research Scholarship in Hungary in 2021","authors":"Péter Sasvári, Tamás Kaiser, Krisztián Várföldi, Csaba Fasi","doi":"10.3390/publications11030043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11030043","url":null,"abstract":"The following paper examines some of the publishing habits observed among the winning applicants of the Bolyai János Research Scholarship. As an academic support programme, the Bolyai Research Scholarship forms a bridge between scholars with the title of doctor of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (HAS) and the young generation of researchers with an academic degree. The winning applicants in 2021 were researchers under the age of 45, cooperating with international co-authors, having highly cited publications and showing a continuous publication history of 15 years on average. The scholarship holders come primarily from research centres and universities. The paper argues that the achievements of scholarship holders follow the international patterns of academic excellence and publication as well as the requirements for international cooperation and publishing mainly in open access journals. In doing so, they prefer journals under the umbrella of Elsevier for performing their publication activities; however, there has been a significant increase in those publishing in MDPI journals, recently. The results show that one-third of the applicants had published before and a fifth of them had published in one of the journals of MDPI two months after announcing the list of the winning applicants. At the same time, differences in publication traditions and award systems reveal marked differences in publication strategies and evaluation criteria across fields of science. Based on this, the descriptive statistics presented in this paper contribute to our understanding of the conscious career planning of young scholars in line with international standards.","PeriodicalId":37551,"journal":{"name":"Publications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49377541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Impact of a National Crisis on Research Collaborations: A Scientometric Analysis of Ukrainian Authors 2019–2022 国家危机对研究合作的影响:2019–2022年乌克兰作者的科学分析
IF 5.2 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-08-18 DOI: 10.3390/publications11030042
R. Damaševičius, Ligita Zailskaitė-Jakštė
This paper analyzes the impact of the ongoing war in Ukraine on the productivity and collaboration networks of Ukrainian academics. As a case study, we analyze the publication patterns in open-access MDPI journals using bibliographic analysis methods and compare the research output published in 2022 with research papers published in the three preceding years (2019–2021) with at least one author having an Ukrainian affiliation. A total of 2365 publications were analyzed. The identified publication trends provide an interesting insight into the dynamics of the research network of Ukrainian researchers, which demonstrated a decline in diversity of international collaborations in 2022. The findings of this study emphasize the necessity of international research collaboration in a variety of fields in order to mitigate the detrimental effects of national crises and emergencies.
本文分析了乌克兰持续战争对乌克兰学术界生产力和合作网络的影响。作为案例研究,我们使用书目分析方法分析了开放获取MDPI期刊的出版模式,并将2022年发表的研究成果与前三年(2019-2021)发表的至少有一位作者与乌克兰有关联的研究论文进行了比较。共分析了2365份出版物。所确定的出版趋势为乌克兰研究人员研究网络的动态提供了一个有趣的见解,这表明2022年国际合作的多样性有所下降。这项研究的结果强调了在各个领域进行国际研究合作的必要性,以减轻国家危机和紧急情况的不利影响。
{"title":"The Impact of a National Crisis on Research Collaborations: A Scientometric Analysis of Ukrainian Authors 2019–2022","authors":"R. Damaševičius, Ligita Zailskaitė-Jakštė","doi":"10.3390/publications11030042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11030042","url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the impact of the ongoing war in Ukraine on the productivity and collaboration networks of Ukrainian academics. As a case study, we analyze the publication patterns in open-access MDPI journals using bibliographic analysis methods and compare the research output published in 2022 with research papers published in the three preceding years (2019–2021) with at least one author having an Ukrainian affiliation. A total of 2365 publications were analyzed. The identified publication trends provide an interesting insight into the dynamics of the research network of Ukrainian researchers, which demonstrated a decline in diversity of international collaborations in 2022. The findings of this study emphasize the necessity of international research collaboration in a variety of fields in order to mitigate the detrimental effects of national crises and emergencies.","PeriodicalId":37551,"journal":{"name":"Publications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49236508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Making Open Scholarship More Equitable and Inclusive 让开放式奖学金更加公平和包容
IF 5.2 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-08-07 DOI: 10.3390/publications11030041
P. Arthur, L. Hearn, Johnston Ryan, Nirmala Menon, Langa Khumalo
Democratizing access to information is an enabler for our digital future. It can transform how knowledge is created, preserved, and shared, and strengthen the connection between academics and the communities they serve. Yet, open scholarship is influenced by history and politics. This article explores the foundations underlying open scholarship as a quest for more just, equitable, and inclusive societies. It analyzes the origins of the open scholarship movement and explores how systemic factors have impacted equality and equity of knowledge access and production according to location, nationality, race, age, gender, and socio-economic circumstances. It highlights how the privileges of the global North permeate academic and technical standards, norms, and infrastructures. It also reviews how the collective design of more open and collaborative networks can engage a richer diversity of communities, enabling greater social inclusion, and presents key examples. By fostering dialogue with multiple stakeholders, more effective avenues for knowledge production and representation can be built based on approaches that are accessible, participatory, interactive, ethical, and transparent, and that reach a far broader public. This expansive vision of open science will lead to a more unified knowledge economy.
信息获取的民主化是我们数字化未来的一个推动者。它可以改变知识的创造、保存和共享方式,并加强学术界与他们所服务的社区之间的联系。然而,开放式学术受到历史和政治的影响。这篇文章探讨了开放学术的基础,以寻求更公正、公平和包容的社会。它分析了开放学术运动的起源,并探讨了系统性因素如何根据地点、国籍、种族、年龄、性别和社会经济环境影响知识获取和生产的平等和公平。它强调了全球北方的特权如何渗透到学术和技术标准、规范和基础设施中。它还回顾了更开放和协作网络的集体设计如何能够吸引更丰富多样的社区,实现更大的社会包容性,并提供了关键的例子。通过促进与多个利益攸关方的对话,可以基于可获取、参与、互动、合乎道德和透明的方法,建立更有效的知识生产和代表途径,并惠及更广泛的公众。这种开放科学的广阔视野将导致一个更加统一的知识经济。
{"title":"Making Open Scholarship More Equitable and Inclusive","authors":"P. Arthur, L. Hearn, Johnston Ryan, Nirmala Menon, Langa Khumalo","doi":"10.3390/publications11030041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11030041","url":null,"abstract":"Democratizing access to information is an enabler for our digital future. It can transform how knowledge is created, preserved, and shared, and strengthen the connection between academics and the communities they serve. Yet, open scholarship is influenced by history and politics. This article explores the foundations underlying open scholarship as a quest for more just, equitable, and inclusive societies. It analyzes the origins of the open scholarship movement and explores how systemic factors have impacted equality and equity of knowledge access and production according to location, nationality, race, age, gender, and socio-economic circumstances. It highlights how the privileges of the global North permeate academic and technical standards, norms, and infrastructures. It also reviews how the collective design of more open and collaborative networks can engage a richer diversity of communities, enabling greater social inclusion, and presents key examples. By fostering dialogue with multiple stakeholders, more effective avenues for knowledge production and representation can be built based on approaches that are accessible, participatory, interactive, ethical, and transparent, and that reach a far broader public. This expansive vision of open science will lead to a more unified knowledge economy.","PeriodicalId":37551,"journal":{"name":"Publications","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42243289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Simulating and Contrasting the Game of Open Access in Diverse Cultural Contexts: A Social Simulation Model 不同文化背景下开放获取游戏的模拟与对比:一个社会模拟模型
IF 5.2 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-08-04 DOI: 10.3390/publications11030040
Oswaldo Terán, Jacinto A. Dávila
Open Access is a global cause with the aim of allowing unrestricted access to all scientific research output in electronic formats. This paper presents a model for simulating the game of interests behind this cause in order to investigate ways of promoting the practice of open access. The model represents the following actors: Academics, Administrators, Funders, Publishers and Politicians. Five scenarios were developed to represent both realistic and ideal, interesting, situations. The model was developed using the SocLab platform—a formalization of the sociology of organizational action. It is based on previous descriptions of the game and expert knowledge. A structural analysis permits us to examine the properties of the sub-model behind each scenario. The results corroborate certain intuitions about the scenarios representing realistic cases, e.g., they indicate that publishers, being isolated in their interests, are subject to strong pressures from other actors, who have a circumstantial alliance. Administrators take an intermediate stance in all scenarios. The best scenarios for open access are those in which Politicians and Funders clearly support the cause by expressing mandates in that direction, backing academics. Surprisingly, the model shows that it is in the Publishers’ interest not to take an extremist position against open access.
开放获取是一项全球性的事业,其目的是允许不受限制地获取所有电子格式的科学研究成果。本文提出了一个模拟这一事业背后的利益博弈的模型,以期探讨促进开放获取实践的途径。该模型代表了以下角色:学者、管理者、资助者、出版商和政治家。设计了五个场景来代表现实的和理想的、有趣的情况。该模型是使用SocLab平台开发的,这是组织行动社会学的形式化。它是基于之前的游戏描述和专家知识。结构分析允许我们检查每个场景背后的子模型的属性。研究结果证实了关于代表现实情况的情景的某些直觉,例如,它们表明,出版商的利益被孤立,受到来自其他行为者的强大压力,这些行为者有间接的联盟。管理员在所有场景中都处于中间位置。开放获取的最佳方案是政治家和资助者明确支持这一事业,向这一方向表达授权,支持学术界。令人惊讶的是,该模型表明,不采取极端立场反对开放获取符合出版商的利益。
{"title":"Simulating and Contrasting the Game of Open Access in Diverse Cultural Contexts: A Social Simulation Model","authors":"Oswaldo Terán, Jacinto A. Dávila","doi":"10.3390/publications11030040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11030040","url":null,"abstract":"Open Access is a global cause with the aim of allowing unrestricted access to all scientific research output in electronic formats. This paper presents a model for simulating the game of interests behind this cause in order to investigate ways of promoting the practice of open access. The model represents the following actors: Academics, Administrators, Funders, Publishers and Politicians. Five scenarios were developed to represent both realistic and ideal, interesting, situations. The model was developed using the SocLab platform—a formalization of the sociology of organizational action. It is based on previous descriptions of the game and expert knowledge. A structural analysis permits us to examine the properties of the sub-model behind each scenario. The results corroborate certain intuitions about the scenarios representing realistic cases, e.g., they indicate that publishers, being isolated in their interests, are subject to strong pressures from other actors, who have a circumstantial alliance. Administrators take an intermediate stance in all scenarios. The best scenarios for open access are those in which Politicians and Funders clearly support the cause by expressing mandates in that direction, backing academics. Surprisingly, the model shows that it is in the Publishers’ interest not to take an extremist position against open access.","PeriodicalId":37551,"journal":{"name":"Publications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47115562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Toward a New World in Scholarly Communication: The 9th PUBMET2022 Conference on Scholarly Communication in the Context of Open Science 走向学术交流的新世界:2022年第九届开放科学背景下的学术交流大会
IF 5.2 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI: 10.3390/publications11030039
J. Stojanovski, Iva Grabarić Andonovski
Open access has emerged from the need to make scholarly communication freely available to the scientific community and not hidden behind a paywall [...]
开放获取源于使科学界能够自由进行学术交流的需要,而不是隐藏在付费墙后面[…]
{"title":"Toward a New World in Scholarly Communication: The 9th PUBMET2022 Conference on Scholarly Communication in the Context of Open Science","authors":"J. Stojanovski, Iva Grabarić Andonovski","doi":"10.3390/publications11030039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11030039","url":null,"abstract":"Open access has emerged from the need to make scholarly communication freely available to the scientific community and not hidden behind a paywall [...]","PeriodicalId":37551,"journal":{"name":"Publications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42247139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Open Educational Resources (OERs) at European Higher Education Institutions in the Field of Library and Information Science during COVID-19 Pandemic COVID-19大流行期间欧洲高等教育机构在图书馆和信息科学领域的开放教育资源(OERs
IF 5.2 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-07-14 DOI: 10.3390/publications11030038
Milijana Mićunović, Sabina Rako, Kristina Feldvari
The purpose of this study is to map the practices regarding open educational resources’ (OERs) development and implementation at European higher education institutions (HEIs) in the field of library and information science (LIS) during the COVID-19 pandemic and to identify the challenges and obstacles to their full and optimal utilization, both during crisis situations and beyond. A systematic literature review and questionnaire-based survey yielded results from 56 European LIS schools/departments (n = 56). Statistical analysis was performed using the R programming language, and descriptive statistics were used to quantify the data sets. The results have shown that the COVID-19 pandemic served as an impetus for the adoption of OERs, particularly in the context of digital education (DE) and remote learning. However, there is still a lack of awareness of the many benefits and opportunities they provide to higher education, as evidenced by the fact than less than half LIS schools/departments used OERs. Certain issues were identified, such as the lack of institutional policies regarding OERs, inadequate peer-review of OERs, and, in most cases, the absence of monitoring and evaluation practices for OERs. The results and insights from this study can be used to improve all aspects of OERs’ implementation and thus accelerate their adoption, both with regard to LIS schools/departments and other fields. Further research into the topic through interviews and focus groups should provide a deeper understanding of opportunities, challenges and practices surrounding the adoption of OERs in the field of LIS education.
本研究的目的是绘制2019冠状病毒病大流行期间欧洲高等教育机构在图书馆和信息科学领域开发和实施开放教育资源(OERs)的实践图,并确定危机期间和危机之后充分和最佳利用开放教育资源的挑战和障碍。系统的文献回顾和基于问卷的调查得出了56所欧洲LIS学院/系(n = 56)的结果。使用R编程语言进行统计分析,并使用描述性统计对数据集进行量化。结果表明,2019冠状病毒病大流行推动了开放式教育资源的采用,特别是在数字教育和远程学习的背景下。然而,人们仍然没有意识到它们为高等教育提供的许多好处和机会,事实证明,只有不到一半的美国学校/部门使用开放教育资源。确定了某些问题,例如缺乏关于开放资源的体制政策,对开放资源的同行审查不足,以及在大多数情况下缺乏对开放资源的监测和评价做法。本研究的结果和见解可用于改进OERs实施的各个方面,从而加速其在LIS学校/部门和其他领域的采用。通过访谈和焦点小组对该主题进行进一步研究,应能更深入地了解围绕在美国教育领域采用OERs的机遇、挑战和实践。
{"title":"Open Educational Resources (OERs) at European Higher Education Institutions in the Field of Library and Information Science during COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Milijana Mićunović, Sabina Rako, Kristina Feldvari","doi":"10.3390/publications11030038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11030038","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to map the practices regarding open educational resources’ (OERs) development and implementation at European higher education institutions (HEIs) in the field of library and information science (LIS) during the COVID-19 pandemic and to identify the challenges and obstacles to their full and optimal utilization, both during crisis situations and beyond. A systematic literature review and questionnaire-based survey yielded results from 56 European LIS schools/departments (n = 56). Statistical analysis was performed using the R programming language, and descriptive statistics were used to quantify the data sets. The results have shown that the COVID-19 pandemic served as an impetus for the adoption of OERs, particularly in the context of digital education (DE) and remote learning. However, there is still a lack of awareness of the many benefits and opportunities they provide to higher education, as evidenced by the fact than less than half LIS schools/departments used OERs. Certain issues were identified, such as the lack of institutional policies regarding OERs, inadequate peer-review of OERs, and, in most cases, the absence of monitoring and evaluation practices for OERs. The results and insights from this study can be used to improve all aspects of OERs’ implementation and thus accelerate their adoption, both with regard to LIS schools/departments and other fields. Further research into the topic through interviews and focus groups should provide a deeper understanding of opportunities, challenges and practices surrounding the adoption of OERs in the field of LIS education.","PeriodicalId":37551,"journal":{"name":"Publications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48129614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gender-Related Differences in the Citation Impact of Scientific Publications and Improving the Authors’ Productivity 科学出版物引文影响与提高作者生产力的性别差异
IF 5.2 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI: 10.3390/publications11030037
Oleksandr Kuchanskyi, Y. Andrashko, A. Biloshchytskyi, S. Omirbayev, A. Mukhatayev, S. Biloshchytska, A. Faizullin
The article’s purpose is an analysis of the citation impact of scientific publications by authors of different gender compositions. The page method was chosen to calculate the citation impact of scientific publications, and the obtained results allowed to estimate the impact of the scientific publications based on the number of citations. The normalized citation impact is calculated according to nine subsets of scientific publications that correspond to patterns of different gender compositions of authors. Also, these estimates were calculated for each country with which the authors of the publications are affiliated. The Citation database, Network Dataset (Ver. 13), was chosen for the scientometric analysis. The dataset includes more than 5 million scientific publications and 48 million citations. Most of the publications in the dataset are from the STEM field. The results indicate that articles with a predominantly male composition are cited more than articles with a mixed or female composition of authors in this direction. Analysis of advantages in dynamics indicates that in the last decade, in developed countries, there has been a decrease in the connection between the citation impact of scientific publications and the gender composition of their authors. However, the obtained results still confirm the presence of gender inequality in science, which may be related to socioeconomic and cultural characteristics, natural homophily, and other factors that contribute to the appearance of gender gaps. An essential consequence of overcoming these gaps, including in science, is ensuring the rights of people in all their diversity.
本文的目的是分析不同性别构成的作者对科学出版物的引文影响。采用页面法计算科学出版物的被引影响,得到的结果可以根据被引次数来估计科学出版物的影响力。规范化引用影响是根据科学出版物的九个子集来计算的,这些子集对应于作者不同性别构成的模式。此外,这些估计数是根据出版物作者所属的每个国家计算的。选择引文数据库Network Dataset (Ver. 13)进行科学计量分析。该数据集包括500多万份科学出版物和4800万次引用。数据集中的大部分出版物都来自STEM领域。结果表明,在这一方向上,男性作者占主导地位的文章比女性作者占主导地位的文章被引用率更高。对动态优势的分析表明,在过去十年中,在发达国家,科学出版物的引用影响与其作者的性别构成之间的联系有所减少。然而,获得的结果仍然证实了科学中存在性别不平等,这可能与社会经济和文化特征、自然同质性以及其他导致性别差距出现的因素有关。克服这些差距(包括科学方面的差距)的一个重要后果是确保各种各样的人的权利。
{"title":"Gender-Related Differences in the Citation Impact of Scientific Publications and Improving the Authors’ Productivity","authors":"Oleksandr Kuchanskyi, Y. Andrashko, A. Biloshchytskyi, S. Omirbayev, A. Mukhatayev, S. Biloshchytska, A. Faizullin","doi":"10.3390/publications11030037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11030037","url":null,"abstract":"The article’s purpose is an analysis of the citation impact of scientific publications by authors of different gender compositions. The page method was chosen to calculate the citation impact of scientific publications, and the obtained results allowed to estimate the impact of the scientific publications based on the number of citations. The normalized citation impact is calculated according to nine subsets of scientific publications that correspond to patterns of different gender compositions of authors. Also, these estimates were calculated for each country with which the authors of the publications are affiliated. The Citation database, Network Dataset (Ver. 13), was chosen for the scientometric analysis. The dataset includes more than 5 million scientific publications and 48 million citations. Most of the publications in the dataset are from the STEM field. The results indicate that articles with a predominantly male composition are cited more than articles with a mixed or female composition of authors in this direction. Analysis of advantages in dynamics indicates that in the last decade, in developed countries, there has been a decrease in the connection between the citation impact of scientific publications and the gender composition of their authors. However, the obtained results still confirm the presence of gender inequality in science, which may be related to socioeconomic and cultural characteristics, natural homophily, and other factors that contribute to the appearance of gender gaps. An essential consequence of overcoming these gaps, including in science, is ensuring the rights of people in all their diversity.","PeriodicalId":37551,"journal":{"name":"Publications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46109835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Social Justice: The Golden Thread in the Openness Movement 社会正义:开放运动中的金线
IF 5.2 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-07-06 DOI: 10.3390/publications11030036
R. Raju, Jill Claassen, Kaela De Lillie
The current publishing landscape perpetuates biases that continue to exclude those who have been previously marginalized, specifically from the Global South including Africa. Incorporating philanthropy as the only driving principle to openly share knowledge is insufficient to truly empower and be inclusive to those who have been relegated to the periphery of the scholarly communication ecosystem. Social justice principles have to underpin the foundation of this ecosystem, in tandem with philanthropy, to shed light on these exclusionary, systemic publishing practices and processes. This will entail first breaking down these unfair practices and then rebuilding the ecosystem by advancing equity, diversity and inclusion. This paper highlights the current gaps in the openness movement and demonstrates, through an exemplar of a publishing platform, how the publishing landscape can be transformed. The publishing platform employs a multi-tenant model that enables multiple institutions to publish and disseminate knowledge on one shared instance of the software. The continental platform and the tenant model that it utilizes address the technological and infrastructural barriers often experienced in the Global South and Africa, while simultaneously serving as a collective hub for hosting African scholarship. This case study methodology is used to investigate how the alternate publishing route recaptures the philanthropic pillars of the openness movement. The findings provide evidence for a return to the founding principles of the openness movement and, as importantly, demonstrates the impact of open access on student success.
目前的出版环境使偏见持续存在,继续排斥那些以前被边缘化的人,特别是来自全球南方包括非洲的人。将慈善作为公开分享知识的唯一驱动原则,不足以真正赋予那些已经被降级到学术传播生态系统边缘的人权力和包容性。社会正义原则必须支撑这一生态系统的基础,与慈善事业相结合,以揭示这些排斥性的、系统性的出版实践和流程。这需要首先打破这些不公平的做法,然后通过促进公平、多样性和包容性来重建生态系统。本文强调了目前开放运动中的差距,并通过一个出版平台的范例来展示如何改变出版格局。发布平台采用多租户模型,使多个机构能够在软件的一个共享实例上发布和传播知识。大陆平台和它利用的租户模式解决了全球南非和非洲经常遇到的技术和基础设施障碍,同时作为主办非洲奖学金的集体中心。本案例研究方法用于调查替代出版路线如何重新抓住开放运动的慈善支柱。这些发现为回归开放运动的基本原则提供了证据,同样重要的是,证明了开放获取对学生成功的影响。
{"title":"Social Justice: The Golden Thread in the Openness Movement","authors":"R. Raju, Jill Claassen, Kaela De Lillie","doi":"10.3390/publications11030036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11030036","url":null,"abstract":"The current publishing landscape perpetuates biases that continue to exclude those who have been previously marginalized, specifically from the Global South including Africa. Incorporating philanthropy as the only driving principle to openly share knowledge is insufficient to truly empower and be inclusive to those who have been relegated to the periphery of the scholarly communication ecosystem. Social justice principles have to underpin the foundation of this ecosystem, in tandem with philanthropy, to shed light on these exclusionary, systemic publishing practices and processes. This will entail first breaking down these unfair practices and then rebuilding the ecosystem by advancing equity, diversity and inclusion. This paper highlights the current gaps in the openness movement and demonstrates, through an exemplar of a publishing platform, how the publishing landscape can be transformed. The publishing platform employs a multi-tenant model that enables multiple institutions to publish and disseminate knowledge on one shared instance of the software. The continental platform and the tenant model that it utilizes address the technological and infrastructural barriers often experienced in the Global South and Africa, while simultaneously serving as a collective hub for hosting African scholarship. This case study methodology is used to investigate how the alternate publishing route recaptures the philanthropic pillars of the openness movement. The findings provide evidence for a return to the founding principles of the openness movement and, as importantly, demonstrates the impact of open access on student success.","PeriodicalId":37551,"journal":{"name":"Publications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45356202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Establishing Genealogies of Born Digital Content: The Suitability of Revision Identifier (RSID) Numbers in MS Word for Forensic Enquiry 建立天生数字内容的谱系:MS Word中修订标识符(RSID)数字在法医学查询中的适用性
IF 5.2 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-06-25 DOI: 10.3390/publications11030035
D. Spennemann, Rudolf J. Spennemann
Born-digital content is rapidly becoming the norm for literary works, professional reports, academic journal articles, and formal corporate correspondence. From the perspective of digital forensics, there is a need to understand the origin of a document and its entire creation process, from outlining and drafting to editing the final version of the text. Revision save identifier (RSID) numbers embedded in MS Word documents have been used to examine the nature and extent of individual edits within a document. These RSIDs remain logged in the metadata even if the text with which they were associated has been removed. As copies of such files retain the original’s RSIDs, this metadata can be used to determine the order in which documents were cloned from each other. As a proof-of-concept, this paper examined over 400 template files generated by a single publisher for manuscript submissions to its journals. The study can show that it is possible to establish genealogies and thus relative chronologies of born digital content by first identifying those documents that share a document (root) RSID and then seriating those RSIDs that are shared between two or more documents.
天生的数字内容正在迅速成为文学作品、专业报告、学术期刊文章和正式企业信件的规范。从数字取证的角度来看,有必要了解文件的起源及其整个创建过程,从概述和起草到编辑文本的最终版本。嵌入MS Word文档中的修订保存标识符(RSID)编号已用于检查文档中单个编辑的性质和范围。即使与这些RSID关联的文本已被删除,这些RSID仍会记录在元数据中。由于此类文件的副本保留了原始文件的RSID,因此可以使用此元数据来确定文档相互克隆的顺序。作为概念验证,本文检查了一家出版商为向其期刊提交稿件而生成的400多个模板文件。该研究可以表明,通过首先识别共享文档(根)RSID的文档,然后对两个或多个文档之间共享的RSID进行序列化,可以建立出生数字内容的家谱,从而建立相对年表。
{"title":"Establishing Genealogies of Born Digital Content: The Suitability of Revision Identifier (RSID) Numbers in MS Word for Forensic Enquiry","authors":"D. Spennemann, Rudolf J. Spennemann","doi":"10.3390/publications11030035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11030035","url":null,"abstract":"Born-digital content is rapidly becoming the norm for literary works, professional reports, academic journal articles, and formal corporate correspondence. From the perspective of digital forensics, there is a need to understand the origin of a document and its entire creation process, from outlining and drafting to editing the final version of the text. Revision save identifier (RSID) numbers embedded in MS Word documents have been used to examine the nature and extent of individual edits within a document. These RSIDs remain logged in the metadata even if the text with which they were associated has been removed. As copies of such files retain the original’s RSIDs, this metadata can be used to determine the order in which documents were cloned from each other. As a proof-of-concept, this paper examined over 400 template files generated by a single publisher for manuscript submissions to its journals. The study can show that it is possible to establish genealogies and thus relative chronologies of born digital content by first identifying those documents that share a document (root) RSID and then seriating those RSIDs that are shared between two or more documents.","PeriodicalId":37551,"journal":{"name":"Publications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44926075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Issues with Journal Issues: Let Journals Be Digital Libraries 期刊问题:让期刊成为数字图书馆
Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-02-09 DOI: 10.3390/publications11010007
C. Sean Burns
Science depends on a communication system, and today, that is largely provided by digital technologies such as the internet and web. Despite the fact that digital technologies provide the infrastructure for this communication system, peer-reviewed journals continue to mimic workflows and processes from the print era. This paper focuses on one artifact from the print era, the journal issue, and describes how this artifact has been detrimental to the communication of science, and therefore, to science itself. To replace the journal issue, this paper argues that scholarly publishing and journals could more fully embrace digital technologies by creating digital libraries to present and organize scholarly output.
科学依赖于通信系统,而今天,这主要是由互联网和网络等数字技术提供的。尽管数字技术为这种交流系统提供了基础设施,同行评议的期刊仍在模仿印刷时代的工作流程和流程。本文聚焦于印刷时代的一个人工制品,期刊问题,并描述了这个人工制品是如何对科学的传播有害的,因此,对科学本身有害。为了取代期刊发行,本文认为学术出版和期刊可以通过创建数字图书馆来呈现和组织学术产出,从而更充分地利用数字技术。
{"title":"The Issues with Journal Issues: Let Journals Be Digital Libraries","authors":"C. Sean Burns","doi":"10.3390/publications11010007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11010007","url":null,"abstract":"Science depends on a communication system, and today, that is largely provided by digital technologies such as the internet and web. Despite the fact that digital technologies provide the infrastructure for this communication system, peer-reviewed journals continue to mimic workflows and processes from the print era. This paper focuses on one artifact from the print era, the journal issue, and describes how this artifact has been detrimental to the communication of science, and therefore, to science itself. To replace the journal issue, this paper argues that scholarly publishing and journals could more fully embrace digital technologies by creating digital libraries to present and organize scholarly output.","PeriodicalId":37551,"journal":{"name":"Publications","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136156092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Publications
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1