Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology最新文献

Objective: Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) are at elevated risk for neurodevelopmental and behavioral disorders. This report describes developmental-behavioral practice patterns among sites who were part of the Dissemination and Implementation of Stroke Prevention Looking at the Care Environment (DISPLACE) consortium in the context of current guidelines for addressing these concerns.

Methods: An internal survey was developed for the Principal Investigators of the DISPLACE study to identify developmental-behavioral clinical practices across the 28-site consortium, including methods for identification, referral practices, access to psychologists, and barriers to services. Descriptive data were pulled from the survey to describe practice patterns.

Results: Most sites used informal methods to detect developmental-behavioral concerns, though over 1/3 of sites were using a structured protocol. The most common referral indications for further developmental and neuropsychological evaluation were parent, provider, or school concerns or stroke. Evaluations were predominantly completed by pediatric neuropsychologists and pediatric psychologists. Despite most sites reporting access to a psychologist within the SCD clinic, sites also reported long waitlists and difficulty accessing providers for evaluation and treatment services. Insurance difficulties were also a common barrier. A range of additional barriers were reported at the patient, provider, organizational, and policy/socio-environmental levels.

Conclusions: Many sites in the DISPLACE consortium were adhering to existing care guidelines for pediatric SCD; however, there was also wide variation in practices for which guidelines are absent or unclear. Additional work is needed to inform guidelines, to specify the role of psychology within specialty SCD care, and to overcome barriers to care.

Implications for impact statement: Optimal developmental-behavioral care for children with SCD involves collaboration among specialty care providers and pediatric psychologists; however, these efforts may be hampered by dispersed or unclear guidelines and several barriers to care. Future studies and guidelines have the potential to improve care by providing clear, consistent, and unified care recommendations specific to psychologists and related care professionals who are supporting children with SCD.

Objective: To map the range of multidisciplinary palliative care interventions that are available to adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with serious illness.

Methods: Scoping review methodology as outlined by Arksey and O'Malley.

Results: Twenty-two articles describing nine specific AYA-focused, multidisciplinary palliative care interventions were included in this review. Interventions focused on supporting advance care planning (ACP), facilitating treatment decision making, managing pain, and promoting resilience, psychosocial well-being, and quality of life. Interventions were delivered face-to-face and via different eHealth platforms and were targeted to AYAs with cancer, HIV/AIDS, and cystic fibrosis in both inpatient and outpatient settings.

Conclusions: Few evidence-based multidisciplinary palliative care interventions have documented benefit for AYAs with serious illness. The limited work that has been done demonstrates that AYAs are open to engaging in palliative care interventions and suggests that individual members of the multidisciplinary team can implement these different interventions to support enhanced patient outcomes.