Pub Date : 2025-10-08DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101558
Samantha A. Lee , Diego Trujillo , Garth D. Meckler , Carl Eriksson , Trang Huynh , Nathan Bahr , Jyotsna Sanjeevi , Matt Hansen , Jeanne-Marie Guise
Background
Pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death in children. This paper describes the study protocol for the randomized control trial to test a linear cognitive aid app (RESCUER) designed to support Emergency Medical Services (EMS) clinicians in responding to neonatal and pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (POHCA).
Objective
This randomized controlled trial (RCT) will investigate the effects of the RESCUER app compared with existing EMS practices and tools during simulated POHCAs.
Study design
This RCT will be conducted with EMS first responders from rural and urban EMS agencies in the United States (US). EMS teams will be randomized to respond to simulated neonatal and POHCAs using either (1) the RESCUER app or (2) their current standard of care and tools. In addition to randomized assignment to intervention and control, we also will randomize the order of simulation scenarios.
Main outcome measures
Primary outcomes include time to complete American Heart Association (AHA) recommended steps for NRP and PALS. Secondary outcomes include participants’ self-rated cognitive load, measured teamwork, and user-focused assessments of feasibility, usability and usefulness of tools.1,2
Conclusion
We hypothesize that the app will decrease time to complete AHA recommended steps for NRP and PALS, compared to EMS teams’ current standard of care and tools. This study will examine whether an app used by EMS teams in responding to simulated neonatal and pediatric OHCAs will improve resuscitation performance and decrease cognitive load.
{"title":"RESCUER mobile app to support pediatric resuscitation: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Samantha A. Lee , Diego Trujillo , Garth D. Meckler , Carl Eriksson , Trang Huynh , Nathan Bahr , Jyotsna Sanjeevi , Matt Hansen , Jeanne-Marie Guise","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101558","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101558","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death in children. This paper describes the study protocol for the randomized control trial to test a linear cognitive aid app (RESCUER) designed to support Emergency Medical Services (EMS) clinicians in responding to neonatal and pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (POHCA).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This randomized controlled trial (RCT) will investigate the effects of the RESCUER app compared with existing EMS practices and tools during simulated POHCAs.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>This RCT will be conducted with EMS first responders from rural and urban EMS agencies in the United States (US). EMS teams will be randomized to respond to simulated neonatal and POHCAs using either (1) the RESCUER app or (2) their current standard of care and tools. In addition to randomized assignment to intervention and control, we also will randomize the order of simulation scenarios.</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><div>Primary outcomes include time to complete American Heart Association (AHA) recommended steps for NRP and PALS. Secondary outcomes include participants’ self-rated cognitive load, measured teamwork, and user-focused assessments of feasibility, usability and usefulness of tools.<sup>1,2</sup></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We hypothesize that the app will decrease time to complete AHA recommended steps for NRP and PALS, compared to EMS teams’ current standard of care and tools. This study will examine whether an app used by EMS teams in responding to simulated neonatal and pediatric OHCAs will improve resuscitation performance and decrease cognitive load.</div></div><div><h3>Trial Registration Number</h3><div>NCT06768099 (<span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 101558"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145333354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-03DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101556
Sophie S. Hall , Evgenia Riga , Eleanor J. Mitchell , Louise Thomson , Jodi Taylor , Lucy Carr , Pamela Hagan , Kirsty Sprange
Background
Evaluating healthcare interventions in clinical trials requires a skilled workforce. However, the demands of developing and running clinical trials make recruiting and retaining staff challenging. Flourishing, which focuses on positive aspects of well-being, may help staff manage these demands. This study introduces the Flourishing As Clinical Trial Staff (FACTS) guidance, offering practical strategies to support staff working in UK Clinical Research Collaboration (UKCRC) Clinical Trials Units (CTUs), to thrive at work.
Methods
Building upon findings from a national survey of staff working in UKCRC CTUs, a three-phase consensus-based approach was used to develop recommendations to support flourishing in clinical trial staff; (1) focus groups with staff (n = 24), (2) a consensus survey (n = 21) and (3) a consensus workshop (n = 15).
Results
The focus groups identified strategies for supporting CTU staff to flourish, including factors relating to the environment (e.g., flexible working); interpersonal communication (e.g., supportive colleagues), growth (e.g., protected training time) and acknowledgement of everyone's contributions. These strategies were developed into 67 wellbeing recommendations which were further evaluated in a consensus survey and workshop. Following this, 61 recommendations were endorsed for inclusion in the guidance.
Conclusions
The FACTS guidance includes recommendations to support UKCRC CTU staff to flourish in their work and are likely to apply more broadly to research institutions conducting clinical trials. The recommendations provide a foundation for CTUs to review and adapt to their local needs over time. Implementing these recommendations may prove beneficial for increasing job satisfaction and commitment, which is likely to facilitate efficient trial delivery.
{"title":"Wellbeing for staff in UKCRC-registered Clinical Trials Units: Development of the Flourishing As Clinical Trial Staff (FACTS) guidance: a mixed-methods study","authors":"Sophie S. Hall , Evgenia Riga , Eleanor J. Mitchell , Louise Thomson , Jodi Taylor , Lucy Carr , Pamela Hagan , Kirsty Sprange","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101556","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101556","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Evaluating healthcare interventions in clinical trials requires a skilled workforce. However, the demands of developing and running clinical trials make recruiting and retaining staff challenging. Flourishing, which focuses on positive aspects of well-being, may help staff manage these demands. This study introduces the Flourishing As Clinical Trial Staff (FACTS) guidance, offering practical strategies to support staff working in UK Clinical Research Collaboration (UKCRC) Clinical Trials Units (CTUs), to thrive at work.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Building upon findings from a national survey of staff working in UKCRC CTUs, a three-phase consensus-based approach was used to develop recommendations to support flourishing in clinical trial staff; (1) focus groups with staff (n = 24), (2) a consensus survey (n = 21) and (3) a consensus workshop (n = 15).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The focus groups identified strategies for supporting CTU staff to flourish, including factors relating to the <em>environment</em> (e.g., flexible working)<em>; interpersonal communication</em> (e.g., supportive colleagues), <em>growth</em> (e.g., protected training time) and <em>acknowledgement</em> of everyone's contributions. These strategies were developed into 67 wellbeing recommendations which were further evaluated in a consensus survey and workshop. Following this, 61 recommendations were endorsed for inclusion in the guidance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The FACTS guidance includes recommendations to support UKCRC CTU staff to flourish in their work and are likely to apply more broadly to research institutions conducting clinical trials. The recommendations provide a foundation for CTUs to review and adapt to their local needs over time. Implementing these recommendations may prove beneficial for increasing job satisfaction and commitment, which is likely to facilitate efficient trial delivery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 101556"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145268552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-20DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101548
Patrick Lewicki , Sabrina Clark , Elaina Shoemaker , Bingkai Wang , Jerison Ross , Stephanie Daignault-Newton , Noelle Carlozzi , Adam Martin-Schwarze , William Meurer , Anne Sales , Khurshid Ghani , Casey Dauw , Kristian Stensland
Introduction
Enrollment to clinical trials is challenging, and few evidence-based interventions to improve enrollment exist. Provider-facing advertising campaigns could help increase enrollment, but this type of intervention has not been prospectively evaluated in a clinical trial.
Methods
We designed a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of a month-long email advertising campaign on enrollment to a clinical trial. This hybrid implementation-effectiveness Study Within a Trial tested the effect of precision audit and feedback techniques enrollment effectiveness outcomes (enrollment) and measured implementation outcomes (email opens, link clicks). This design is an application of a Study Within a Trial (SWAT) to evaluate an intervention intended to improve enrollment. The goal of this study was to inform both this advertising campaign and refine SWAT methods for evaluating future trial improvement interventions.
Discussion
This Study Within a Trial provides preliminary data on the effectiveness of email advertising campaigns for improving clinical trial enrollment. Additionally, the infrastructure built through this SWAT will inform future studies of clinical trial enrollment improvement. This protocol can serve as a template for other investigators seeking to evaluate enrollment improvement interventions.
{"title":"Rationale and protocol for a prospective clinical trial enrollment improvement hybrid study within a trial","authors":"Patrick Lewicki , Sabrina Clark , Elaina Shoemaker , Bingkai Wang , Jerison Ross , Stephanie Daignault-Newton , Noelle Carlozzi , Adam Martin-Schwarze , William Meurer , Anne Sales , Khurshid Ghani , Casey Dauw , Kristian Stensland","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101548","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101548","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Enrollment to clinical trials is challenging, and few evidence-based interventions to improve enrollment exist. Provider-facing advertising campaigns could help increase enrollment, but this type of intervention has not been prospectively evaluated in a clinical trial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We designed a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of a month-long email advertising campaign on enrollment to a clinical trial. This hybrid implementation-effectiveness Study Within a Trial tested the effect of precision audit and feedback techniques enrollment effectiveness outcomes (enrollment) and measured implementation outcomes (email opens, link clicks). This design is an application of a Study Within a Trial (SWAT) to evaluate an intervention intended to improve enrollment. The goal of this study was to inform both this advertising campaign and refine SWAT methods for evaluating future trial improvement interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This Study Within a Trial provides preliminary data on the effectiveness of email advertising campaigns for improving clinical trial enrollment. Additionally, the infrastructure built through this SWAT will inform future studies of clinical trial enrollment improvement. This protocol can serve as a template for other investigators seeking to evaluate enrollment improvement interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 101548"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145119444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-16DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101554
Callin Chetty , Nomfuneko Mafunda , Anna-Ursula Happel , Anam Khan , Briah Cooley Demidkina , Nonhlanhla Yende-Zuma , Yusra Saidi , Asthu Mahabeer Polliah , Lara Lewis , Farzana Osman , Precious Radebe , Jo-Ann S. Passmore , Doug Kwon , Jacques Ravel , Sinaye Ngcapu , Lenine Liebenberg , Laura Symul , Susan Holmes , Caroline M. Mitchell , Disebo Potloane
Background
Globally, approximately 30 % of women have bacterial vaginosis (BV). Antibiotic treatment is frequently followed by recurrence, likely due to lack of colonization with beneficial lactobacilli.
Methods
This is a Phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of vaginal live biotherapeutic products (LBP) after antibiotic treatment for BV to establish Lactobacillus colonization. The LBP are vaginal tablets containing 6 L. crispatus strains (LC106) or 15 L. crispatus strains (LC115), at 2 x 109 colony forming units (CFU) per dose. Participants with BV in the United States and South Africa will receive seven days of oral metronidazole twice daily and will be randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to: seven days placebo; seven days LC106; three days LC106/four days placebo; seven days LC106 starting day 3 of the metronidazole course; or seven days LC115. Safety will be assessed by the number and percentage of ≥ Grade 2 related adverse events during or after product use. The primary outcome is LBP colonization defined as relative abundance ≥5 % of any LBP strain or ≥10 % of a combination of LBP strains by metagenomic sequencing any time in the 5 weeks after randomization. A generalized linear model will measure the association between treatment group and colonization, adjusting for site.
Conclusions
This study seeks to establish proof of concept for a multi-strain LBP to promote vaginal L. crispatus colonization in two geographically distinct populations.
Trial registration
South African National Clinical Trials Registry (SANCTR DOH-27-102023-8342; October 27, 2023) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06135974; November 11, 2023).
{"title":"Randomized trial of multi-strain Lactobacillus crispatus vaginal live biotherapeutic products after antibiotic therapy for bacterial vaginosis: study protocol for VIBRANT (vaginal lIve biotherapeutic RANdomized trial)","authors":"Callin Chetty , Nomfuneko Mafunda , Anna-Ursula Happel , Anam Khan , Briah Cooley Demidkina , Nonhlanhla Yende-Zuma , Yusra Saidi , Asthu Mahabeer Polliah , Lara Lewis , Farzana Osman , Precious Radebe , Jo-Ann S. Passmore , Doug Kwon , Jacques Ravel , Sinaye Ngcapu , Lenine Liebenberg , Laura Symul , Susan Holmes , Caroline M. Mitchell , Disebo Potloane","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101554","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101554","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Globally, approximately 30 % of women have bacterial vaginosis (BV). Antibiotic treatment is frequently followed by recurrence, likely due to lack of colonization with beneficial lactobacilli.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a Phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of vaginal live biotherapeutic products (LBP) after antibiotic treatment for BV to establish <em>Lactobacillus</em> colonization. The LBP are vaginal tablets containing 6 <em>L. crispatus</em> strains (LC106) or 15 <em>L. crispatus</em> strains (LC115), at 2 x 10<sup>9</sup> colony forming units (CFU) per dose. Participants with BV in the United States and South Africa will receive seven days of oral metronidazole twice daily and will be randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to: seven days placebo; seven days LC106; three days LC106/four days placebo; seven days LC106 starting day 3 of the metronidazole course; or seven days LC115. Safety will be assessed by the number and percentage of ≥ Grade 2 related adverse events during or after product use. The primary outcome is LBP colonization defined as relative abundance ≥5 % of any LBP strain or ≥10 % of a combination of LBP strains by metagenomic sequencing any time in the 5 weeks after randomization. A generalized linear model will measure the association between treatment group and colonization, adjusting for site.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study seeks to establish proof of concept for a multi-strain LBP to promote vaginal <em>L. crispatus</em> colonization in two geographically distinct populations.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>South African National Clinical Trials Registry (SANCTR DOH-27-102023-8342; October 27, 2023) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06135974; November 11, 2023).</div></div><div><h3>Protocol version</h3><div>2.0 dated October 03, 2023.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 101554"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145108169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-16DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101553
Javier Muñoz Laguna , Jafar Kolahi , Heejung Bang
Blinding is an important methodological aspect of randomized controlled trials. Although three blinding indices are available for the estimation of blinding in clinical trials, little guidance is available regarding their comparison and application. Here, we compared three blinding indices and applied them to hypothetical and real-world clinical trial data. Through this comparison and application tutorial, we identified strengths and limitations of each blinding index. Our findings provide insights into the assessment, estimation and reporting of blinding in randomized controlled trials.
{"title":"Unmasking three blinding indices for randomized controlled trials: comparison and application","authors":"Javier Muñoz Laguna , Jafar Kolahi , Heejung Bang","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101553","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101553","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Blinding is an important methodological aspect of randomized controlled trials. Although three blinding indices are available for the estimation of blinding in clinical trials, little guidance is available regarding their comparison and application. Here, we compared three blinding indices and applied them to hypothetical and real-world clinical trial data. Through this comparison and application tutorial, we identified strengths and limitations of each blinding index. Our findings provide insights into the assessment, estimation and reporting of blinding in randomized controlled trials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 101553"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145268553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-16DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101555
Carla S. Stover , Sarah Meshberg-Cohen , Galina A. Portnoy , Satvika Char , Carter W. McCaskill , Quyen A. Do , James Dziura , Steve Martino
Substance Use (SU) and Family Violence (FV) are both critical public health concerns and often occur together. However, most existing interventions target only one of these problems, without consideration of the other, and fail to address when individuals with these issues are parents. The current Stage II randomized clinical trial (RCT) aims to compare two individually delivered interventions, Fathers for Change (F4C) and Individual Drug Counseling (IDC) in 280 fathers who have used physical or psychological violence towards a partner, have a substance use disorder, and have a biological child between the ages of 3 months and 12 years. They will be recruited from two locations (Department of Veteran Affairs [VA] and community substance use treatment clinic). This efficacy study aims to demonstrate that F4C can achieve comparable SU reductions to IDC, while also reducing FV, with increases in emotion regulation meditating the relationship between the intervention group and reduced SU and FV. Findings from this study have large scale clinical and public health implications that can help target and address co-occurring SU and FV and mitigate negative outcomes for affected children and families.
{"title":"Efficacy of an integrated treatment for fathers with Co-occurring substance misuse and family violence","authors":"Carla S. Stover , Sarah Meshberg-Cohen , Galina A. Portnoy , Satvika Char , Carter W. McCaskill , Quyen A. Do , James Dziura , Steve Martino","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101555","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101555","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Substance Use (SU) and Family Violence (FV) are both critical public health concerns and often occur together. However, most existing interventions target only one of these problems, without consideration of the other, and fail to address when individuals with these issues are parents. The current Stage II randomized clinical trial (RCT) aims to compare two individually delivered interventions, Fathers for Change (F4C) and Individual Drug Counseling (IDC) in 280 fathers who have used physical or psychological violence towards a partner, have a substance use disorder, and have a biological child between the ages of 3 months and 12 years. They will be recruited from two locations (Department of Veteran Affairs [VA] and community substance use treatment clinic). This efficacy study aims to demonstrate that F4C can achieve comparable SU reductions to IDC, while also reducing FV, with increases in emotion regulation meditating the relationship between the intervention group and reduced SU and FV. Findings from this study have large scale clinical and public health implications that can help target and address co-occurring SU and FV and mitigate negative outcomes for affected children and families.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 101555"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145108168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-10DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101549
Ian H. Stanley , Julia Finn , Kathleen M. Flarity , Mengli Xiao , Rachel L. Johnson , Jaclyn C. Kearns , Natalie L. Wilver , Steven J. Berkowitz , Michael D. Anestis , Marian E. Betz , Joseph A. Simonetti
Firearm injury is the most common suicide method. When firearms are stored in a non-secure manner (e.g., unlocked, loaded), risk for suicide may be elevated. Accordingly, clinical, public health, and firearm industry stakeholders recommend efforts to promote secure firearm storage, such as lethal means safety counseling (LMSC). One LMSC intervention, Project Safe Guard (PSG), has demonstrated efficacy in prompting use of firearm locking devices in a sample of military service members; however, subsequent analyses show that PSG has diminished efficacy for individuals with elevated symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PTSD, characterized in part by hypervigilance to threat, is associated with elevated suicide risk as well as a greater likelihood of storing firearms using less secure methods. In response, our group developed an adaptation of PSG, termed Project Safe Guard-Trauma (PSG-T). This paper describes the design, methodology, and protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing PSG-T to PSG among adults who screen positive for PTSD related to a victimization trauma (e.g., physical assault, sexual assault, combat) and who do not currently store all their personally owned firearms in a secure manner. PSG and PSG-T will be delivered by licensed clinical psychologists. Assessments will occur at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up. The primary objective is to determine the efficacy of PSG-T in prompting greater beliefs and practices regarding secure storage of personal firearms.
{"title":"Project Safe Guard–Trauma (PSG-T): Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of lethal means safety counseling to promote secure firearm storage among individuals with PTSD","authors":"Ian H. Stanley , Julia Finn , Kathleen M. Flarity , Mengli Xiao , Rachel L. Johnson , Jaclyn C. Kearns , Natalie L. Wilver , Steven J. Berkowitz , Michael D. Anestis , Marian E. Betz , Joseph A. Simonetti","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101549","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101549","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Firearm injury is the most common suicide method. When firearms are stored in a non-secure manner (e.g., unlocked, loaded), risk for suicide may be elevated. Accordingly, clinical, public health, and firearm industry stakeholders recommend efforts to promote secure firearm storage, such as lethal means safety counseling (LMSC). One LMSC intervention, Project Safe Guard (PSG), has demonstrated efficacy in prompting use of firearm locking devices in a sample of military service members; however, subsequent analyses show that PSG has diminished efficacy for individuals with elevated symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PTSD, characterized in part by hypervigilance to threat, is associated with elevated suicide risk as well as a greater likelihood of storing firearms using less secure methods. In response, our group developed an adaptation of PSG, termed Project Safe Guard-Trauma (PSG-T). This paper describes the design, methodology, and protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing PSG-T to PSG among adults who screen positive for PTSD related to a victimization trauma (e.g., physical assault, sexual assault, combat) and who do not currently store all their personally owned firearms in a secure manner. PSG and PSG-T will be delivered by licensed clinical psychologists. Assessments will occur at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up. The primary objective is to determine the efficacy of PSG-T in prompting greater beliefs and practices regarding secure storage of personal firearms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 101549"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145048841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-02DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101547
Lauren Rogak , Jamie K. Forschmiedt , Ethan Basch , Gina L. Mazza , Minji K. Lee , Eric A. Meek , Brenda Ginos , Blake T. Langlais , Brie N. Noble , Allison M. Deal , Claire Yee , Gita Thanarajasingam , Amylou C. Dueck
The Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology for Adverse Events® (PRO-CTCAE®) item library enables patient self-reporting of symptoms in cancer clinical trials. It was developed as a companion to CTCAE v4.0. The aim of this analysis is to understand how PRO-CTCAE has been used since its release. Trials using PRO-CTCAE were identified on clinicaltrials.gov. Trial characteristics were descriptively analyzed. Number of trials by year posted on clinicaltrials.gov was tested for increasing trend using Poisson regression. Among 327 identified trials, 318 (97 %) were in oncology, 269 (82 %) were interventional, and 170 (52 %) were randomized. Number of trials significantly increased over time (P < .001). PRO-CTCAE has had substantial and growing use in oncology trials since its release.
{"title":"Use of patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events in oncology clinical trials","authors":"Lauren Rogak , Jamie K. Forschmiedt , Ethan Basch , Gina L. Mazza , Minji K. Lee , Eric A. Meek , Brenda Ginos , Blake T. Langlais , Brie N. Noble , Allison M. Deal , Claire Yee , Gita Thanarajasingam , Amylou C. Dueck","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101547","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101547","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology for Adverse Events® (PRO-CTCAE®) item library enables patient self-reporting of symptoms in cancer clinical trials. It was developed as a companion to CTCAE v4.0. The aim of this analysis is to understand how PRO-CTCAE has been used since its release. Trials using PRO-CTCAE were identified on clinicaltrials.gov. Trial characteristics were descriptively analyzed. Number of trials by year posted on clinicaltrials.gov was tested for increasing trend using Poisson regression. Among 327 identified trials, 318 (97 %) were in oncology, 269 (82 %) were interventional, and 170 (52 %) were randomized. Number of trials significantly increased over time (<em>P</em> < .001). PRO-CTCAE has had substantial and growing use in oncology trials since its release.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 101547"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145004165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101544
Carlos Almonacid , Borja G. Cosío , Xavier Muñoz Gall , Manuel Santiñà Vila , Jaime Signes-Costa , José Luis Velasco Garrido , Mercedes Luz , Marta Rodríguez , Alberto Godos , Ana Pérez Domínguez , Eunice Funenga , Carmen Moreno
Clinical trials (CT) are the framework upon which novel treatments' safety and efficacy are assessed. The CARABELA-CT initiative aims to optimise Spanish CT procedures by improving efficiency, quality, and subject well-being. To this, it characterised CT healthcare models, identified improvement areas, proposed solutions, and gathered important insights from CT subjects. CARABELA-CT took a three-phase approach. Phase I involved CT healthcare models’ characterisation, including all clinical investigation processes in Spain, across six pilot hospitals, identifying improvement areas and solutions. Phase II validated these findings, defining key healthcare quality indicators. Phase III focused on dissemination and implementation. Additionally, seven randomly invited CT subjects participated in a focus group to share their experiences regarding communication, coordination, and CT impact on quality of life. Three CT healthcare models were identified, distinguished according to access, infrastructure, and resources. Twelve improvement areas were defined, leading to 38 solutions addressing subject education, professional training, organisation, protocols, resources, and technology. Twenty-four healthcare quality indicators were established to monitor CT processes. Subject experiences highlighted the need for clearer communication, digitalised information, and improved subject support, and revealed the emotional and psychological benefits of CT participation, despite the challenges. CARABELA-CT provides a comprehensive framework to enhance Spanish CT processes. This initiative integrates potential solutions in improvement areas in CT development and the corresponding healthcare quality indicators, and prioritises subject experiences to foster efficiency, participant engagement, and a sustainable, patient-centric clinical research model. These findings contribute to the continuous improvement of CT management, ultimately optimising research execution and healthcare outcomes.
{"title":"Optimising clinical trial management in Spain: The CARABELA-Clinical trials framework integrating healthcare models and subject experiences","authors":"Carlos Almonacid , Borja G. Cosío , Xavier Muñoz Gall , Manuel Santiñà Vila , Jaime Signes-Costa , José Luis Velasco Garrido , Mercedes Luz , Marta Rodríguez , Alberto Godos , Ana Pérez Domínguez , Eunice Funenga , Carmen Moreno","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101544","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101544","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Clinical trials (CT) are the framework upon which novel treatments' safety and efficacy are assessed. The CARABELA-CT initiative aims to optimise Spanish CT procedures by improving efficiency, quality, and subject well-being. To this, it characterised CT healthcare models, identified improvement areas, proposed solutions, and gathered important insights from CT subjects. CARABELA-CT took a three-phase approach. Phase I involved CT healthcare models’ characterisation, including all clinical investigation processes in Spain, across six pilot hospitals, identifying improvement areas and solutions. Phase II validated these findings, defining key healthcare quality indicators. Phase III focused on dissemination and implementation. Additionally, seven randomly invited CT subjects participated in a focus group to share their experiences regarding communication, coordination, and CT impact on quality of life. Three CT healthcare models were identified, distinguished according to access, infrastructure, and resources. Twelve improvement areas were defined, leading to 38 solutions addressing subject education, professional training, organisation, protocols, resources, and technology. Twenty-four healthcare quality indicators were established to monitor CT processes. Subject experiences highlighted the need for clearer communication, digitalised information, and improved subject support, and revealed the emotional and psychological benefits of CT participation, despite the challenges. CARABELA-CT provides a comprehensive framework to enhance Spanish CT processes. This initiative integrates potential solutions in improvement areas in CT development and the corresponding healthcare quality indicators, and prioritises subject experiences to foster efficiency, participant engagement, and a sustainable, patient-centric clinical research model. These findings contribute to the continuous improvement of CT management, ultimately optimising research execution and healthcare outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 101544"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145050425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-29DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101541
Ivan HC. Wu , Lorna McNeill , Kristen Knutson , Yisheng Li , Diwakar Balachandran , Rhonda Jones-Webb , Pamela L. Lutsey , Darin Erikson , Shikha Bista , Rachel Price , Vanessa Anyanso , Taylor Smith , Rev Melvin Miller
Background
Black/African American (AA) adults experience shorter sleep duration and poorer sleep quality compared to White counterparts, contributing to higher risks of chronic diseases. Project SHINE (Sleep Health INitiative for Equity) aims to address these sleep disparities by evaluating the feasibility, satisfaction, and plausibility (i.e., preliminary efficacy) of a culturally tailored sleep intervention designed to improve sleep duration and physical activity among AA adults with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 not meeting physical activity and sleep guideline recommendations.
Methods
This pilot community-based randomized controlled trial (RCT) includes two phases. Phase 1 involves qualitative interviews with AA adults to explore sleep-related sociocontextual factors to refine the intervention. Phase 2 is an RCT (n = 80) assigning participants to a four-week sleep extension intervention or a contact control. The sleep extension intervention aims to improve sleep duration and physical activity. Sessions occur via Zoom, with in-person baseline and follow-up visits. Primary outcomes include feasibility and satisfaction of the intervention. Secondary outcomes include self-reported and objective sleep and physical activity measures, plus exploratory biomarkers for cancer and cardiovascular risk. Additional self-reports assess sleep-related psychosocial factors and health behaviors.
Discussion
This study will assess the feasibility and implementation of a culturally tailored, virtual sleep intervention for AA adults. By integrating behavior change theories, cultural adaptation frameworks, and community-based participatory principles, Project SHINE aims to inform a larger-scale trial and support scalable behavioral interventions to improve sleep health and reduce disparities.
背景:与白人相比,黑人/非裔美国人(AA)成年人的睡眠时间更短,睡眠质量更差,这导致他们患慢性病的风险更高。SHINE项目(Sleep Health INitiative for Equity,睡眠健康公平倡议)旨在通过评估一种文化量身定制的睡眠干预的可行性、满意度和合理性(即初步疗效)来解决这些睡眠差异,该干预旨在改善体重指数(BMI)≥25的AA级成人的睡眠时间和身体活动,这些成年人不符合身体活动和睡眠指南的建议。方法以社区为基础的随机对照试验(RCT)分为两个阶段。第一阶段包括对AA成人进行定性访谈,以探索与睡眠相关的社会背景因素,以完善干预措施。第二阶段是一项随机对照试验(n = 80),分配参与者进行为期四周的睡眠延长干预或接触控制。睡眠延长干预旨在改善睡眠时间和身体活动。会议通过Zoom进行,包括面对面的基线和后续访问。主要结局包括干预的可行性和满意度。次要结果包括自我报告和客观的睡眠和身体活动测量,以及癌症和心血管风险的探索性生物标志物。额外的自我报告评估睡眠相关的心理社会因素和健康行为。本研究将评估一种针对嗜酒者的虚拟睡眠干预的可行性和实施。通过整合行为改变理论、文化适应框架和社区参与原则,SHINE项目旨在为更大规模的试验提供信息,并支持可扩展的行为干预措施,以改善睡眠健康并减少差异。
{"title":"Study protocol for Project SHINE (Sleep Health INitiative for Equity): A community-based pilot RCT to promote sleep and physical activity among Black/African American adults","authors":"Ivan HC. Wu , Lorna McNeill , Kristen Knutson , Yisheng Li , Diwakar Balachandran , Rhonda Jones-Webb , Pamela L. Lutsey , Darin Erikson , Shikha Bista , Rachel Price , Vanessa Anyanso , Taylor Smith , Rev Melvin Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101541","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101541","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Black/African American (AA) adults experience shorter sleep duration and poorer sleep quality compared to White counterparts, contributing to higher risks of chronic diseases. Project SHINE (Sleep Health INitiative for Equity) aims to address these sleep disparities by evaluating the feasibility, satisfaction, and plausibility (i.e., preliminary efficacy) of a culturally tailored sleep intervention designed to improve sleep duration and physical activity among AA adults with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 not meeting physical activity and sleep guideline recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This pilot community-based randomized controlled trial (RCT) includes two phases. Phase 1 involves qualitative interviews with AA adults to explore sleep-related sociocontextual factors to refine the intervention. Phase 2 is an RCT (n = 80) assigning participants to a four-week sleep extension intervention or a contact control. The sleep extension intervention aims to improve sleep duration and physical activity. Sessions occur via Zoom, with in-person baseline and follow-up visits. Primary outcomes include feasibility and satisfaction of the intervention. Secondary outcomes include self-reported and objective sleep and physical activity measures, plus exploratory biomarkers for cancer and cardiovascular risk. Additional self-reports assess sleep-related psychosocial factors and health behaviors.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This study will assess the feasibility and implementation of a culturally tailored, virtual sleep intervention for AA adults. By integrating behavior change theories, cultural adaptation frameworks, and community-based participatory principles, <em>Project SHINE</em> aims to inform a larger-scale trial and support scalable behavioral interventions to improve sleep health and reduce disparities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 101541"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145050424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}