Pub Date : 2024-08-17DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101354
Michael J. Eckrote , Carrie M. Nielson , Mike Lu , Tyler Alexander , Rikisha Shah Gupta , Kim Wah Low , Zhiwei Zhang , Austin Eliazar , Reyna Klesh , Andrew Kress , Matt Bryant , Alex Asiimwe , Nicolle M. Gatto , Nancy A. Dreyer
In drug development, the use of real-world data (RWD) has augmented our understanding of patients’ health care experiences and the effects of treatments beyond clinical trials. Although electronic health record (EHR) data integration at clinical trial sites is a widely adopted practice, primarily for recruitment and data capture, a challenge to data utility is the fragmentation of health data across different sources.
Linking RWD sources to each other and to trial data -- while preserving patient privacy through tokenization -- aids in filling evidence gaps with outcome data and facilitates the generalization of effects from controlled trial environments to real-world settings. This paper describes the applications of RWD linkage and how they benefit both clinical development and real-world decision-making. Trial benefits include improving interpretability and generalizability (e.g., by remediating missing data or losses to follow-up), extending follow-up beyond trial closeout, and characterizing the applicability of trial results to under-represented groups.
The operational aspects of linking trial data to RWD are addressed, emphasizing the importance of using privacy-preserving record linking systems with established metrics of accuracy and precision, managing consent, and providing the necessary training and resources at trial sites to inform participants about providing access to their RWD through data linkage.
{"title":"Linking clinical trial participants to their U.S. real-world data through tokenization: A practical guide","authors":"Michael J. Eckrote , Carrie M. Nielson , Mike Lu , Tyler Alexander , Rikisha Shah Gupta , Kim Wah Low , Zhiwei Zhang , Austin Eliazar , Reyna Klesh , Andrew Kress , Matt Bryant , Alex Asiimwe , Nicolle M. Gatto , Nancy A. Dreyer","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101354","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101354","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In drug development, the use of real-world data (RWD) has augmented our understanding of patients’ health care experiences and the effects of treatments beyond clinical trials. Although electronic health record (EHR) data integration at clinical trial sites is a widely adopted practice, primarily for recruitment and data capture, a challenge to data utility is the fragmentation of health data across different sources.</p><p>Linking RWD sources to each other and to trial data -- while preserving patient privacy through tokenization -- aids in filling evidence gaps with outcome data and facilitates the generalization of effects from controlled trial environments to real-world settings. This paper describes the applications of RWD linkage and how they benefit both clinical development and real-world decision-making. Trial benefits include improving interpretability and generalizability (e.g., by remediating missing data or losses to follow-up), extending follow-up beyond trial closeout, and characterizing the applicability of trial results to under-represented groups.</p><p>The operational aspects of linking trial data to RWD are addressed, emphasizing the importance of using privacy-preserving record linking systems with established metrics of accuracy and precision, managing consent, and providing the necessary training and resources at trial sites to inform participants about providing access to their RWD through data linkage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101354"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865424001017/pdfft?md5=b3417adeac61a9fbdd6d2870d5b20542&pid=1-s2.0-S2451865424001017-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142087771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-17DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101353
Anne Rivelli , Osondi Ozoani-Lohrer , Cheryl Lefaiver , Maureen Shields , Andy Marek , Mercedes Robaina , Veronica Fitzpatrick
Background
To explore the association between ethnicity, as a proxy for language, and participation in clinical trials (CT) conducted by Principal Investigators (PI) who speak one or more language in addition to English.
Methods
This retrospective, descriptive study utilized CT participant demographic data extracted from the largest Midwestern non-profit healthcare system between January 1, 2019 and 12/31/2021. The CT participant sample (N = 4308) was divided for comparison: CT Participants of Hispanic or Latino Origin (N = 254; 5.90 %) and CT Participants of Non-Hispanic or Latino Origin (N = 4054; 94.10 %). Logistic regressions were performed to generate the crude and adjusted odds of patients of Hispanic or Latino origin participating in CTs conducted by PIs who speak another language in addition to English.
Results
Crude analysis revealed that patients of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity had 2.04 (1.58, 2.64) times greater odds of participating in CTs conducted by PIs who speak another language than English (<0.0001), which increased to 2.67 (1.97, 3.62) times greater odds after adjusting for sex, race, age and insurance (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
Overall findings indicate that patients of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, who are more likely to speak Spanish, have greater odds of participating in CTs conducted by PIs who speak another language beyond English. This may imply that cultural sensitivity at the top of a CT study team, as likely to be demonstrated by PIs who speak another language beyond English, may be an important contributor to reducing ethnicity- and language-based barriers to diversity in CTs and a relationship worth exploring further.
{"title":"Patient participation in clinical trials conducted by principal investigators who speak one or more language(s) beyond english: Exploring ethnicity as proxy for language","authors":"Anne Rivelli , Osondi Ozoani-Lohrer , Cheryl Lefaiver , Maureen Shields , Andy Marek , Mercedes Robaina , Veronica Fitzpatrick","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101353","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101353","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To explore the association between ethnicity, as a proxy for language, and participation in clinical trials (CT) conducted by Principal Investigators (PI) who speak one or more language in addition to English.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective, descriptive study utilized CT participant demographic data extracted from the largest Midwestern non-profit healthcare system between January 1, 2019 and 12/31/2021. The CT participant sample (N = 4308) was divided for comparison: CT Participants of Hispanic or Latino Origin (N = 254; 5.90 %) and CT Participants of Non-Hispanic or Latino Origin (N = 4054; 94.10 %). Logistic regressions were performed to generate the crude and adjusted odds of patients of Hispanic or Latino origin participating in CTs conducted by PIs who speak another language in addition to English.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Crude analysis revealed that patients of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity had 2.04 (1.58, 2.64) times greater odds of participating in CTs conducted by PIs who speak another language than English (<0.0001), which increased to 2.67 (1.97, 3.62) times greater odds after adjusting for sex, race, age and insurance (p < 0.0001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Overall findings indicate that patients of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, who are more likely to speak Spanish, have greater odds of participating in CTs conducted by PIs who speak another language beyond English. This may imply that cultural sensitivity at the top of a CT study team, as likely to be demonstrated by PIs who speak another language beyond English, may be an important contributor to reducing ethnicity- and language-based barriers to diversity in CTs and a relationship worth exploring further.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101353"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865424001005/pdfft?md5=bb106c2f0283635499325954e4a043f0&pid=1-s2.0-S2451865424001005-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142012855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-15DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101347
Alex Hagood , Logan Patrick Corwin , Jay S. Modi , Garrett A. Jones , Kyle J. Fitzgerald , Kimberly J. Magana , Shaelyn A. Ward , Trevor R. Magee , Griffin K. Hughes , Alicia Ito Ford , Matt Vassar
Main problem
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a progressive condition that affects millions of people worldwide. A standardized core outcome set (COS) was developed for CKD by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes and Measurements in 2019. This study aims to evaluate the frequency of measurement for these outcomes before and after the publication of the COS.
Methods
A literature search was done to gather the phase III/IV clinical trials evaluating chronic kidney disease through ClinicalTrials.gov. Data extraction of included studies was completed in a masked, duplicate fashion. The included studies were evaluated for characteristics such as survival, burden of disease, patient-reported health-related quality of life, and treatment modality-specific outcomes.
Results
Our results showed that the majority of all COS domains were inadequately measured in CKD clinical trials before and after publication of the COS. Despite the increase in COS measurements following publication, the average percent of COS outcomes measured was less than 40 % per year even after four years.
Conclusion
There is a notable deficiency in the complete measurement of COS among all domains both before and after COS publication. We suggest efforts be made to improve the adoption of consistent outcome measures that would benefit the growing population of patients affected by CKD.
主要问题慢性肾脏病(CKD)是一种渐进性疾病,影响着全球数百万人。国际健康结果和测量联合会于 2019 年为 CKD 制定了一套标准化核心结果(COS)。本研究旨在评估 COS 发布前后这些结果的测量频率。方法通过 ClinicalTrials.gov 进行文献检索,收集评估慢性肾病的 III/IV 期临床试验。对纳入研究的数据提取是以蒙面、重复的方式完成的。结果我们的研究结果表明,在 COS 发布前后的 CKD 临床试验中,大多数 COS 领域的测量都不充分。结论在 COS 发布前后,对 COS 所有领域的全面测量都存在明显不足。我们建议努力改进采用一致的结果测量方法,使越来越多的慢性肾脏病患者受益。
{"title":"Assessing core outcome set uptake in randomized controlled trials for chronic kidney disease: Cross-sectional analysis","authors":"Alex Hagood , Logan Patrick Corwin , Jay S. Modi , Garrett A. Jones , Kyle J. Fitzgerald , Kimberly J. Magana , Shaelyn A. Ward , Trevor R. Magee , Griffin K. Hughes , Alicia Ito Ford , Matt Vassar","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101347","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101347","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Main problem</h3><p>Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a progressive condition that affects millions of people worldwide. A standardized core outcome set (COS) was developed for CKD by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes and Measurements in 2019. This study aims to evaluate the frequency of measurement for these outcomes before and after the publication of the COS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A literature search was done to gather the phase III/IV clinical trials evaluating chronic kidney disease through ClinicalTrials.gov. Data extraction of included studies was completed in a masked, duplicate fashion. The included studies were evaluated for characteristics such as survival, burden of disease, patient-reported health-related quality of life, and treatment modality-specific outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our results showed that the majority of all COS domains were inadequately measured in CKD clinical trials before and after publication of the COS. Despite the increase in COS measurements following publication, the average percent of COS outcomes measured was less than 40 % per year even after four years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is a notable deficiency in the complete measurement of COS among all domains both before and after COS publication. We suggest efforts be made to improve the adoption of consistent outcome measures that would benefit the growing population of patients affected by CKD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101347"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865424000942/pdfft?md5=5bad43fdb5894cc82cad7e0b8b515896&pid=1-s2.0-S2451865424000942-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142040355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-14DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101351
Hai Nguyen-Tran , Alicen B. Spaulding , Kevin Messacar , Matthew R. Vogt , Perdita Permaul , Daniel C. Douek , Abe Mittelman , Careese Thompson , Sandy Grubbs , Christine Magana , Michelle L. Hernandez
Recruitment and retention are challenges for prospective pediatric cohort studies, particularly those involving serial venipunctures. We investigated factors underlying enrollment and retention in the Pandemic Response Repository through Microbial and Immune Surveillance and Epidemiology (PREMISE) Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) Pilot Study, a multicenter prospective longitudinal cohort study assessing the utility of immunologic surveillance for pandemic preparedness. This study enrolls children ≤10 years for two blood draws, pre- and post-EV-D68 season, separated by 6–18 months. Overall, 174 children were enrolled in Cohort 1 of the study and 120 (69 %) of children completed the study, with follow-up blood samples obtained from 101 (58 %) of participants. Families were primarily motivated to participate by a desire to help other children, advance science, and better prepare for the next pandemic. Adding research blood draws to clinically indicated blood draws improved enrollment, and multiple study touch points facilitated retention. These findings can be applied to improve recruitment and retention in future pandemic preparedness efforts and longitudinal pediatric cohort studies.
{"title":"Recruitment and retention of pediatric participants for pandemic preparedness research: Experience from the PREMISE EV-D68 Pilot Study","authors":"Hai Nguyen-Tran , Alicen B. Spaulding , Kevin Messacar , Matthew R. Vogt , Perdita Permaul , Daniel C. Douek , Abe Mittelman , Careese Thompson , Sandy Grubbs , Christine Magana , Michelle L. Hernandez","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101351","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101351","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recruitment and retention are challenges for prospective pediatric cohort studies, particularly those involving serial venipunctures. We investigated factors underlying enrollment and retention in the Pandemic Response Repository through Microbial and Immune Surveillance and Epidemiology (PREMISE) Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) Pilot Study, a multicenter prospective longitudinal cohort study assessing the utility of immunologic surveillance for pandemic preparedness. This study enrolls children ≤10 years for two blood draws, pre- and post-EV-D68 season, separated by 6–18 months. Overall, 174 children were enrolled in Cohort 1 of the study and 120 (69 %) of children completed the study, with follow-up blood samples obtained from 101 (58 %) of participants. Families were primarily motivated to participate by a desire to help other children, advance science, and better prepare for the next pandemic. Adding research blood draws to clinically indicated blood draws improved enrollment, and multiple study touch points facilitated retention. These findings can be applied to improve recruitment and retention in future pandemic preparedness efforts and longitudinal pediatric cohort studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245186542400098X/pdfft?md5=f2f2475dd9c315a9b69ebe306ba020d1&pid=1-s2.0-S245186542400098X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141998626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-13DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101341
Tristan P. Hurzeler , Warren Logge , Joshua Watt , Marilena M. DeMayo , Anastasia Suraev , Iain S. McGregor , Paul S. Haber , Kirsten C. Morley
Current treatments for alcohol use disorders (AUD) have limited efficacy. Recently, Cannabidiol (CBD) has been examined in a multitude of clinical settings. Preclinical and clinical results suggest that CBD might be particularly well suited for the treatment of AUD and may reduce alcohol cue and stress-induced craving and alcohol seeking. This study aims to investigate this new pharmacotherapy with a particular focus on neurobiological and physiological indicators of craving. Methods: In this double-blind, within-subject, randomised, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, non-treatment seekers will be randomly allocated to three days of four 200 mg CBD gel capsules (800 mg/day) or placebo, with an 18-day washout period. Cognitive, clinical, and neuroimaging assessments will be completed during these three days. The CBD and placebo assessments will be compared. The primary outcomes are i) BOLD signal as a proxy for regional activity during a cue reactivity and a fear response task measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), ii) heart rate variability and skin conductance levels as a proxy for psychophysiological responses to alcohol stimuli. The secondary outcomes are: i) neurometabolite levels (γ-Aminobutyric acid, ethanol, glutathione, and glutamate + glutamine (combined signal)) using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS); ii) functional connectivity using resting state fMRI (rsfMRI); iii) executive functioning task results; iv) clinical outcomes such as craving, anxiety, and sleep. Discussion: This study will improve the understanding of the mechanisms of action of CBD and provide early signals of efficacy regarding the therapeutic potential of CBD in the treatment of alcohol use disorder.
{"title":"The neurobehavioural effects of cannabidiol in alcohol use disorder: Study protocol for a double-blind, randomised, cross over, placebo-controlled trial","authors":"Tristan P. Hurzeler , Warren Logge , Joshua Watt , Marilena M. DeMayo , Anastasia Suraev , Iain S. McGregor , Paul S. Haber , Kirsten C. Morley","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101341","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101341","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Current treatments for alcohol use disorders (AUD) have limited efficacy. Recently, Cannabidiol (CBD) has been examined in a multitude of clinical settings. Preclinical and clinical results suggest that CBD might be particularly well suited for the treatment of AUD and may reduce alcohol cue and stress-induced craving and alcohol seeking. This study aims to investigate this new pharmacotherapy with a particular focus on neurobiological and physiological indicators of craving. <em>Methods</em>: In this double-blind, within-subject, randomised, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, non-treatment seekers will be randomly allocated to three days of four 200 mg CBD gel capsules (800 mg/day) or placebo, with an 18-day washout period. Cognitive, clinical, and neuroimaging assessments will be completed during these three days. The CBD and placebo assessments will be compared. The primary outcomes are i) BOLD signal as a proxy for regional activity during a cue reactivity and a fear response task measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), ii) heart rate variability and skin conductance levels as a proxy for psychophysiological responses to alcohol stimuli. The secondary outcomes are: i) neurometabolite levels (γ-Aminobutyric acid, ethanol, glutathione, and glutamate + glutamine (combined signal)) using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS); ii) functional connectivity using resting state fMRI (rsfMRI); iii) executive functioning task results; iv) clinical outcomes such as craving, anxiety, and sleep. <em>Discussion:</em> This study will improve the understanding of the mechanisms of action of CBD and provide early signals of efficacy regarding the therapeutic potential of CBD in the treatment of alcohol use disorder.</p><p>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05387148.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101341"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865424000887/pdfft?md5=e866e8877dce231506b2f638eb87f66d&pid=1-s2.0-S2451865424000887-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142012856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-12DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101350
Xin Gong , Yuheng Jiao , Hao Hu , Rongzhen Zhang , Wenwen Jia , Jun Zhao , Zhongmin Liu , Yuanfeng Xin , Wei Han
Background and objective
The use of mesenchymal stem cells for heart failure treatment has gained increasing interest. However, most studies have relied on a single injection approach, with no research yet confirming the effects of multiple administrations. The present trial aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of multi-intravenous infusion of umbilical cord-mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
Methods
The PRIME-HFrEF trial is a single-center, prospective, randomized, triple-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of multi-intravenous infusion of UC-MSCs in HFrEF patients. A total of 40 patients meeting the inclusion criteria for HFrEF were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to the MSC group or the placebo group. Patients enrolled will receive intravenous injections of either UC-MSCs or placebo every 6 weeks for three times. Both groups will be followed up for 12 months. The primary safety endpoint is the incidence of serious adverse events. The primary efficacy endpoint is a change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured by left ventricular opacification (LVO) with contrast echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 12 months. The secondary endpoints include a composite of the incidence of death and re-hospitalization caused by heart failure at the 12th month, serum NT-proBNP, growth stimulation expressed gene 2 (ST2), and a change of right ventricular structure and function.
Conclusions
The PRIME-HFrEF study is designed to shed new light on multiple UC-MSC administration regimens for heart failure treatment.
{"title":"A prospective randomized controlled study of multi-intravenous infusion of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (PRIME-HFrEF) trial: Rationale and design","authors":"Xin Gong , Yuheng Jiao , Hao Hu , Rongzhen Zhang , Wenwen Jia , Jun Zhao , Zhongmin Liu , Yuanfeng Xin , Wei Han","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101350","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101350","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><p>The use of mesenchymal stem cells for heart failure treatment has gained increasing interest. However, most studies have relied on a single injection approach, with no research yet confirming the effects of multiple administrations. The present trial aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of multi-intravenous infusion of umbilical cord-mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PRIME-HFrEF trial is a single-center, prospective, randomized, <span><span>triple-blinded</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, placebo-controlled trial of multi-intravenous infusion of UC-MSCs in HFrEF patients. A total of 40 patients meeting the inclusion criteria for HFrEF were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to the MSC group or the placebo group. Patients enrolled will receive intravenous injections of either UC-MSCs or placebo every 6 weeks for three times. Both groups will be followed up for 12 months. The primary safety endpoint is the incidence of serious adverse events. The primary efficacy endpoint is a change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured by left ventricular opacification (LVO) with contrast echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 12 months. The secondary endpoints include a composite of the incidence of death and re-hospitalization caused by heart failure at the 12th month, serum NT-proBNP, growth stimulation expressed gene 2 (ST<sub>2</sub>), and a change of right ventricular structure and function.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The PRIME-HFrEF study is designed to shed new light on multiple UC-MSC administration regimens for heart failure treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101350"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865424000978/pdfft?md5=686513cfc9869eb7b93103588f639400&pid=1-s2.0-S2451865424000978-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141990688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Children with Cerebral Palsy (CP) encounter substantial nutritional challenges that impair their health and quality of life. Despite the importance of nutrition in managing CP and the recognition of physiological, behavioral, and social causes of malnutrition, research on the effectiveness of individualized nutritional interventions developed and supported by multidisciplinary teams is scarce.
Aim
The study will evaluate the impact of an individualized nutritional intervention developed and supported by a multidisciplinary team on the anthropometric outcomes and overall health of children with CP.
Methods
A single-center, randomized controlled trial, conducted at the Medical University of Varna, Bulgaria, will enroll 100 children aged 2–12 years and diagnosed with CP. Participants will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group, receiving comprehensive structured dietary assessment and individualized nutrition plan developed by a multidisciplinary team of experts, or to a standard care group. Outcomes assessed will focus on anthropometric measures of nutritional status, but also include health outcomes, child development and clinical assessments, and quality of life indicators.
Ethics
Ethical approval for this study has been obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee at the Medical University of Varna (Protocol No. 134 dated 20.07.2023).
Conclusion
This study will assess the benefits of a multidisciplinary, individualized nutritional intervention for children with CP. The findings will have implications for clinical guidelines and interventions aiming to improve their care and quality of life.
{"title":"A randomized controlled trial protocol for the introduction of a multidisciplinary individualized nutritional intervention in children with cerebral palsy","authors":"Ruzha Pancheva , Stanka A. Fitneva , Rositsa Chamova , Dimitar Marinov , Albena Toneva , Stanislava Hadzhieva , Rozalina Braykova , Nikoleta Yoncheva , Stefka Tsvetanova , Silviya Nikolova , Natalya Usheva , Koen Huysentruyt , Karina Dimova , Yana Bocheva , Stanislava Pavlova , Petya Hristanova","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101343","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101343","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Children with Cerebral Palsy (CP) encounter substantial nutritional challenges that impair their health and quality of life. Despite the importance of nutrition in managing CP and the recognition of physiological, behavioral, and social causes of malnutrition, research on the effectiveness of individualized nutritional interventions developed and supported by multidisciplinary teams is scarce.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>The study will evaluate the impact of an individualized nutritional intervention developed and supported by a multidisciplinary team on the anthropometric outcomes and overall health of children with CP.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single-center, randomized controlled trial, conducted at the Medical University of Varna, Bulgaria, will enroll 100 children aged 2–12 years and diagnosed with CP. Participants will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group, receiving comprehensive structured dietary assessment and individualized nutrition plan developed by a multidisciplinary team of experts, or to a standard care group. Outcomes assessed will focus on anthropometric measures of nutritional status, but also include health outcomes, child development and clinical assessments, and quality of life indicators.</p></div><div><h3>Ethics</h3><p>Ethical approval for this study has been obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee at the Medical University of Varna (Protocol No. 134 dated 20.07.2023).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study will assess the benefits of a multidisciplinary, individualized nutritional intervention for children with CP. The findings will have implications for clinical guidelines and interventions aiming to improve their care and quality of life.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865424000905/pdfft?md5=44783d01057befebaccffd6efcb4ed66&pid=1-s2.0-S2451865424000905-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141963802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-02DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101344
Junqiang Dai, Jianghua He, Milind A. Phadnis
Background
Time-to-event (TTE) endpoints are evaluated as the primary endpoint in single-arm clinical trials; however, limited options are available in statistical software for sample size calculation. In single-arm trials with TTE endpoints, the non-parametric log-rank test is commonly used. Parametric options for single-arm design assume survival times follow exponential distribution or Weibull distribution.
Methods
The exponential- or Weibull-distributed survival time assumption does not always reflect hazard pattern of real-life diseases. We therefore propose gamma distribution as an alternative parametric option for designing single-arm studies with TTE endpoints. We outline a sample size calculation approach using gamma distribution with a known shape parameter and explain how to extract the gamma shape estimate from previously published resources. In addition, we conduct simulations to assess the accuracy of the extracted gamma shape parameter and to explore the impact on sample size calculation when survival time distribution is misspecified.
Results
Our simulations show that if a previously published study (sample sizes 60 and censoring proportions 20 %) reported median and inter-quartile range of survival time, we can obtain a reasonably accurate gamma shape estimate, and use it to design new studies. When true survival time is Weibull-distributed, sample size calculation could be underestimated or overestimated depending on the hazard shape.
Conclusions
We show how to use gamma distribution in designing a single-arm trial, thereby offering more options beyond the exponential and Weibull. We provide a simulation-based assessment to ensure an accurate estimation of the gamma shape and recommend caution to avoid misspecification of the underlying distribution.
{"title":"Sample size considerations for single-arm clinical trials with time-to-event endpoint using the gamma distribution","authors":"Junqiang Dai, Jianghua He, Milind A. Phadnis","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101344","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101344","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Time-to-event (TTE) endpoints are evaluated as the primary endpoint in single-arm clinical trials; however, limited options are available in statistical software for sample size calculation. In single-arm trials with TTE endpoints, the non-parametric log-rank test is commonly used. Parametric options for single-arm design assume survival times follow exponential distribution or Weibull distribution.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The exponential- or Weibull-distributed survival time assumption does not always reflect hazard pattern of real-life diseases. We therefore propose gamma distribution as an alternative parametric option for designing single-arm studies with TTE endpoints. We outline a sample size calculation approach using gamma distribution with a known shape parameter and explain how to extract the gamma shape estimate from previously published resources. In addition, we conduct simulations to assess the accuracy of the extracted gamma shape parameter and to explore the impact on sample size calculation when survival time distribution is misspecified.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our simulations show that if a previously published study (sample sizes <span><math><mrow><mo>≥</mo></mrow></math></span> 60 and censoring proportions <span><math><mrow><mo>≤</mo></mrow></math></span> 20 %) reported median and inter-quartile range of survival time, we can obtain a reasonably accurate gamma shape estimate, and use it to design new studies. When true survival time is Weibull-distributed, sample size calculation could be underestimated or overestimated depending on the hazard shape.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We show how to use gamma distribution in designing a single-arm trial, thereby offering more options beyond the exponential and Weibull. We provide a simulation-based assessment to ensure an accurate estimation of the gamma shape and recommend caution to avoid misspecification of the underlying distribution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865424000917/pdfft?md5=798a1b4fa602adf63ab3debcbf80ce33&pid=1-s2.0-S2451865424000917-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141963803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-31DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101345
Kate Guastaferro , Mia S. Melchior , Siyu Heng , Jessica Trudeau , Jacqueline L. Holloway
Background
Child sexual abuse (CSA) affects 1 in 5 girls and 1 in 12 boys before age 18. Universal school-based prevention programs are an effective and cost-efficient method of teaching students an array of personal safety skills. However, the programmatic reach of universal school-based programs is limited by the inherent reliance on the school infrastructure and a dearth of available alternative delivery modalities.
Methods
The design for this study will use a rigorous cluster randomized design (N = 180 classrooms) to determine the equivalence of two delivery modalities of Safe Touches: as usual vs. modified. The as usual workshop will be delivered by two facilitators with live puppet skits (n = 90). Whereas, the modified workshop will be delivered by one facilitator using prerecorded skit videos (n = 90). We will determine the equivalence by measuring concept learning acquisition preworkshop to immediate postworkshop (Aim 1) and retention at 3-months postworkshop (Aim 2) among students in classrooms that receive the as usual or modified workshops. To conclude equivalence, it is imperative to also examine factors that may impact future dissemination and implementation, specifically program adoption among school personnel and implementation fidelity between the two modalities (Aim 3).
Conclusion
Study findings will inform the ongoing development of effective CSA prevention programs and policy decisions regarding the sustainable integration of such programs within schools.
{"title":"Maximizing the reach of universal child sexual abuse prevention: Protocol for an equivalence trial","authors":"Kate Guastaferro , Mia S. Melchior , Siyu Heng , Jessica Trudeau , Jacqueline L. Holloway","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101345","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101345","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Child sexual abuse (CSA) affects 1 in 5 girls and 1 in 12 boys before age 18. Universal school-based prevention programs are an effective and cost-efficient method of teaching students an array of personal safety skills. However, the programmatic reach of universal school-based programs is limited by the inherent reliance on the school infrastructure and a dearth of available alternative delivery modalities.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The design for this study will use a rigorous cluster randomized design (<em>N</em> = 180 classrooms) to determine the equivalence of two delivery modalities of <em>Safe Touches</em>: as usual vs. modified. The as usual workshop will be delivered by two facilitators with live puppet skits (<em>n</em> = 90). Whereas, the modified workshop will be delivered by one facilitator using prerecorded skit videos (<em>n</em> = 90). We will determine the equivalence by measuring concept learning acquisition preworkshop to immediate postworkshop (Aim 1) and retention at 3-months postworkshop (Aim 2) among students in classrooms that receive the as usual or modified workshops. To conclude equivalence, it is imperative to also examine factors that may impact future dissemination and implementation, specifically program adoption among school personnel and implementation fidelity between the two modalities (Aim 3).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Study findings will inform the ongoing development of effective CSA prevention programs and policy decisions regarding the sustainable integration of such programs within schools.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><p>NCT06195852.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101345"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865424000929/pdfft?md5=7a621ae6a4e96fe2de07ac8edcd407d7&pid=1-s2.0-S2451865424000929-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141952060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}