首页 > 最新文献

Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online最新文献

英文 中文
《别无选择:墨西哥的生育、公民身份和土著文化》,罗莎琳·维加,德克萨斯大学出版社,奥斯汀(2018),第238页,ISBN 978-1-4773-1677-1
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.01.001
Sandra Patricia González-Santos
{"title":"","authors":"Sandra Patricia González-Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2020.01.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2020.01.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"9 ","pages":"Pages 64-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2020.01.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"55023090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
结果如何书评
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.11.001
Rosalynn Vega
{"title":"","authors":"Rosalynn Vega","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2019.11.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2019.11.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"9 ","pages":"Pages 17-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2019.11.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47578666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How Things Have Changed: Adoption Memoirs of Second-Generation American and British Gay Dads 事情是如何改变的:第二代美国和英国同性恋父亲的收养回忆录
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.10.003
Linda L. Layne
{"title":"How Things Have Changed: Adoption Memoirs of Second-Generation American and British Gay Dads","authors":"Linda L. Layne","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2019.10.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2019.10.003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"9 ","pages":"Pages 71-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2019.10.003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44426820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
It takes a community to conceive: an analysis of the scope, nature and accuracy of online sources of health information for couples trying to conceive 它需要一个社区来怀孕:对试图怀孕的夫妇的在线健康信息来源的范围、性质和准确性的分析
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.08.004
Sophie G.E. Kedzior , Tina Bianco-Miotto , James Breen , Kerrilyn R. Diener , Martin Donnelley , Kylie R. Dunning , Megan A.S. Penno , John E. Schjenken , David J. Sharkey , Nicolette A. Hodyl , Tod Fullston , Maria Gardiner , Hannah M. Brown , Alice R. Rumbold

This study examined the nature and accuracy of information available across online platforms for couples trying to conceive. A consumer simulation-based investigation of English websites and social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram) was undertaken using common search terms identified in a pilot study. Claims about fertility and pregnancy health were then extracted from the results and analysed thematically. The accuracy of each claim was assessed independently by six fertility and conception experts, rated on a scale of 1 (not factual) to 4 (highly factual), with scores collated to produce a median rating. Claims with a median score < 3 were classified as inaccurate. The use of the terms 'trying to conceive' and '#TTC' were common identifiers on online platforms. Claims were extracted predominantly from websites (n = 89) rather than social media, with Twitter and Instagram comprising commercial elements and Facebook focused on community-based support. Thematic analysis revealed three major themes among the claims across all platforms: conception behaviour and monitoring, lifestyle and exposures, and medical. Fact-checking by the experts revealed that 40% of the information assessed was inaccurate, and that inaccuracies were more likely to be present in the conception behaviour and monitoring advice, the topics most amenable to modification. Since online information is a readily accessible and commonly utilized resource, there is opportunity for improved dissemination of evidence-based material to reach interested couples. Further cross-disciplinary and consumer-based research, such as a user survey, is required to understand how best to provide the 'trying to conceive' community with accurate information.

这项研究调查了在线平台上为想要怀孕的夫妇提供的信息的性质和准确性。使用在试点研究中确定的常见搜索词,对英语网站和社交媒体(Facebook, Twitter, Instagram)进行了基于消费者模拟的调查。然后从结果中提取有关生育能力和怀孕健康的说法,并对其进行主题分析。每一种说法的准确性都由六位生育和受孕专家独立评估,评分范围从1(不真实)到4(高度真实),分数整理后得出一个中位数。索赔中位数得分<3项被列为不准确。“试图怀孕”和“#TTC”是网络平台上常见的标识符。索赔主要来自网站(n = 89),而不是社交媒体,Twitter和Instagram包含商业元素,Facebook侧重于社区支持。专题分析揭示了所有平台索赔的三个主要主题:受孕行为和监测、生活方式和暴露以及医疗。专家们进行的事实核查显示,40%的评估信息是不准确的,而不准确的信息更有可能出现在受孕行为和监测建议中,而这些话题是最容易修改的。由于在线信息是一种容易获得和普遍利用的资源,因此有机会改进以证据为基础的材料的传播,使感兴趣的夫妇接触到这些材料。需要进一步的跨学科和基于消费者的研究,如用户调查,以了解如何最好地为“尝试构思”社区提供准确的信息。
{"title":"It takes a community to conceive: an analysis of the scope, nature and accuracy of online sources of health information for couples trying to conceive","authors":"Sophie G.E. Kedzior ,&nbsp;Tina Bianco-Miotto ,&nbsp;James Breen ,&nbsp;Kerrilyn R. Diener ,&nbsp;Martin Donnelley ,&nbsp;Kylie R. Dunning ,&nbsp;Megan A.S. Penno ,&nbsp;John E. Schjenken ,&nbsp;David J. Sharkey ,&nbsp;Nicolette A. Hodyl ,&nbsp;Tod Fullston ,&nbsp;Maria Gardiner ,&nbsp;Hannah M. Brown ,&nbsp;Alice R. Rumbold","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2019.08.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2019.08.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examined the nature and accuracy of information available across online platforms for couples trying to conceive. A consumer simulation-based investigation of English websites and social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram) was undertaken using common search terms identified in a pilot study. Claims about fertility and pregnancy health were then extracted from the results and analysed thematically. The accuracy of each claim was assessed independently by six fertility and conception experts, rated on a scale of 1 (not factual) to 4 (highly factual), with scores collated to produce a median rating. Claims with a median score &lt;<!--> <!-->3 were classified as inaccurate. The use of the terms 'trying to conceive' and '#TTC' were common identifiers on online platforms. Claims were extracted predominantly from websites (<em>n</em> = 89) rather than social media, with Twitter and Instagram comprising commercial elements and Facebook focused on community-based support. Thematic analysis revealed three major themes among the claims across all platforms: conception behaviour and monitoring, lifestyle and exposures, and medical. Fact-checking by the experts revealed that 40% of the information assessed was inaccurate, and that inaccuracies were more likely to be present in the conception behaviour and monitoring advice, the topics most amenable to modification. Since online information is a readily accessible and commonly utilized resource, there is opportunity for improved dissemination of evidence-based material to reach interested couples. Further cross-disciplinary and consumer-based research, such as a user survey, is required to understand how best to provide the 'trying to conceive' community with accurate information.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"9 ","pages":"Pages 48-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2019.08.004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37611797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
IVF: The women who helped make it happen 试管受精:帮助实现这一目标的女性
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.11.002
Martin H. Johnson

In this paper I pay tribute to four named women and 280 unidentified women patients for their essential roles in supporting Bob Edwards and Patrick Steptoe during the pioneering early days of IVF. The four named women are Jean Purdy, Muriel Harris, Lillian Lincoln Howell and Ruth Fowler.

在这篇论文中,我向四名有名字的女性和280名身份不明的女性患者致敬,感谢她们在试管婴儿的早期开创性阶段支持鲍勃·爱德华兹和帕特里克·斯特普托的重要作用。这四位被提名的女性分别是珍·珀迪、穆里尔·哈里斯、莉莲·林肯·豪厄尔和露丝·福勒。
{"title":"IVF: The women who helped make it happen","authors":"Martin H. Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2018.11.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2018.11.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper I pay tribute to four named women and 280 unidentified women patients for their essential roles in supporting Bob Edwards and Patrick Steptoe during the pioneering early days of IVF. The four named women are Jean Purdy, Muriel Harris, Lillian Lincoln Howell and Ruth Fowler.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2018.11.002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36980487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Honouring ‘Patient 38’ – a mother of all IVF mothers? 纪念“38号病人”——所有试管婴儿母亲的母亲?
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.009
Fiona Littleton , Susan Bewley

This commentary addresses one aspect of the early history of IVF in Britain. Specific data are re-examined from the recently published, anonymized database of medical records from the Oldham period of research conducted by Robert Edwards, Patrick Steptoe and their team of assistants between 1969 and 1978. By focusing on a reformulation of the ‘scheduled treatment cycles per patient’, attention is drawn to the small, but nevertheless not insignificant, number of subjects who returned to Oldham at least five times or more to undergo innovative procedures and/or receive other experimental treatments over the duration of the research project. These multiple efforts are contrasted with the single or double treatment cycles received by the majority of the infertile women involved, including the only two experiencing live births, Lesley Brown and Grace Montgomery. The re-presented data facilitates new interpretations and raises fresh research questions about the nature of contemporary and present characterisations of the major protagonists in the ‘IVF story’, the identity of those women who originally took part and the origin of and reasons for discrepancies in the records maintained about research subjects.

这篇评论论述了英国试管婴儿早期历史的一个方面。具体数据重新检查了最近公布的匿名数据库,这些数据库是由罗伯特·爱德华兹、帕特里克·斯特普托和他们的助手团队在1969年至1978年期间进行的奥尔德姆时期的研究。通过对“每位患者的计划治疗周期”的重新制定,将注意力吸引到数量不多但并非微不足道的受试者上,这些受试者在研究项目期间至少五次或更多次返回Oldham接受创新程序和/或接受其他实验性治疗。这些多重努力与大多数不孕妇女接受的单次或两次治疗周期形成鲜明对比,其中包括仅有的两名活产妇女,莱斯利·布朗和格蕾丝·蒙哥马利。重新呈现的数据促进了新的解释,并提出了新的研究问题,即“试管婴儿故事”中主要主角的当代和当前特征的本质,最初参与研究的妇女的身份,以及关于研究对象的记录中差异的起源和原因。
{"title":"Honouring ‘Patient 38’ – a mother of all IVF mothers?","authors":"Fiona Littleton ,&nbsp;Susan Bewley","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This commentary addresses one aspect of the early history of IVF in Britain. Specific data are re-examined from the recently published, anonymized database of medical records from the Oldham period of research conducted by Robert Edwards, Patrick Steptoe and their team of assistants between 1969 and 1978. By focusing on a reformulation of the ‘scheduled treatment cycles per patient’, attention is drawn to the small, but nevertheless not insignificant, number of subjects who returned to Oldham at least five times or more to undergo innovative procedures and/or receive other experimental treatments over the duration of the research project. These multiple efforts are contrasted with the single or double treatment cycles received by the majority of the infertile women involved, including the only two experiencing live births, Lesley Brown and Grace Montgomery. The re-presented data facilitates new interpretations and raises fresh research questions about the nature of contemporary and present characterisations of the major protagonists in the ‘IVF story’, the identity of those women who originally took part and the origin of and reasons for discrepancies in the records maintained about research subjects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 7-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.009","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37045543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Excluding indigenous bioethical concerns when regulating frozen embryo storage: An Aotearoa New Zealand case study 在规范冷冻胚胎储存时排除土著生物伦理问题:一个新西兰奥特罗阿的案例研究
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.01.001
Ruth P. Fitzgerald , Michael Legge , Poia Rewi , Ella J. Robinson

This article undertakes a close reading of the parliamentary debates associated with the topic of embryo cryopreservation in Aotearoa New Zealand. From our critical readings, we argue that there is a lack of transparency over the ethical reasons for enforcing a maximum storage limit. We demonstrate that arguments for the retention of this limit are associated (in New Zealand) with arguments based upon ‘build-up avoidance’ and ‘conflict avoidance’ as social goods based on Pākehā [New Zealander of European descent] cultural world views rather than identifiable universal ethical principles. We illustrate that the avoidance of embryo accumulation and related conflict was only achieved by the denial of indigenous spiritual and cultural concerns, while also shifting the ethical burdens of disposition on to clinic staff and those members of the public who protested against enforced cryopreserved embryo disposal. The Pākehā cultural concept of ‘tidy housekeeping’ emerges as a presumed ethical and social good in the New Zealand situation. This is despite abundant literature documenting the suffering created through forced decision-making upon disposition.

这篇文章进行了细致的阅读议会辩论有关胚胎冷冻保存的话题在新西兰奥特罗阿。从我们的批判性阅读来看,我们认为执行最大存储限制的道德原因缺乏透明度。我们证明,保留这一限制的论点(在新西兰)与基于Pākehā[欧洲血统的新西兰人]文化世界观而不是可识别的普遍伦理原则的社会商品的“避免积累”和“避免冲突”的论点有关。我们说明,避免胚胎积累和相关冲突只能通过否认土著精神和文化问题来实现,同时也将处理的伦理负担转移到诊所工作人员和那些抗议强制冷冻胚胎处理的公众成员身上。在新西兰的情况下,Pākehā文化概念“整洁的家务”作为一种假定的道德和社会利益出现。尽管有大量文献记录了在处置过程中被迫决策所造成的痛苦。
{"title":"Excluding indigenous bioethical concerns when regulating frozen embryo storage: An Aotearoa New Zealand case study","authors":"Ruth P. Fitzgerald ,&nbsp;Michael Legge ,&nbsp;Poia Rewi ,&nbsp;Ella J. Robinson","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2019.01.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2019.01.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article undertakes a close reading of the parliamentary debates associated with the topic of embryo cryopreservation in Aotearoa New Zealand. From our critical readings, we argue that there is a lack of transparency over the ethical reasons for enforcing a maximum storage limit. We demonstrate that arguments for the retention of this limit are associated (in New Zealand) with arguments based upon ‘build-up avoidance’ and ‘conflict avoidance’ as social goods based on Pākehā [New Zealander of European descent] cultural world views rather than identifiable universal ethical principles. We illustrate that the avoidance of embryo accumulation and related conflict was only achieved by the denial of indigenous spiritual and cultural concerns, while also shifting the ethical burdens of disposition on to clinic staff and those members of the public who protested against enforced cryopreserved embryo disposal. The Pākehā cultural concept of ‘tidy housekeeping’ emerges as a presumed ethical and social good in the New Zealand situation. This is despite abundant literature documenting the suffering created through forced decision-making upon disposition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 10-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2019.01.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37086869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Impact of government health coverage for ART: The results of a 5-year experience in Quebec 政府医疗保险对抗逆转录病毒治疗的影响:魁北克5年经验的结果
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.01.002
F. Bissonnette , S. Phillips , J. Sampalis , E.M. Dahdouh , P. St-Michel , W. Buckett , I.J. Kadoch , N. Mahutte

An analysis of national registry data for 5 years of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) funding in Quebec, Canada was compared with the previous complete year of non-funded IVF cycles, as well as the first complete year following the end of funding. The number of cycles, livebirth rates, age group of patients treated, use of donor gametes, multiple pregnancy rates and cycle cancellation rates were assessed. The total number of IVF cycles performed increased dramatically during the funded period, averaging over 10,000 cycles per year. There was no change in the age group distribution of patients treated, but less egg donation was performed. Interestingly, funding was also associated with an increase in the IVF cycle cancellation rate (17.0% versus 34.4%, P < 0.001), a dramatic decline in the multiple pregnancy rate (25.6% versus 4.9%, P < 0.001), and a decline in the livebirth rate per fresh embryo transfer in stimulated IVF cycles (32.3% versus 25.5%, P < 0.001). Although the livebirth rate for stimulated IVF declined, over 9000 babies were born as a result of the coverage. Lessons learned from this experience could help develop a more fiscally responsible programme that still facilitates access to IVF care.

对加拿大魁北克省5 年体外受精(IVF)资助的国家登记数据进行了分析,将其与前一年未资助的体外受精周期以及资助结束后的第一个完整年份进行了比较。评估周期数、活产率、治疗患者年龄组、供体配子的使用、多胎妊娠率和周期取消率。在资助期间进行的试管婴儿周期总数急剧增加,平均每年超过10,000次 周期。接受治疗的患者的年龄组分布没有变化,但卵子捐赠减少了。有趣的是,资金也与试管婴儿周期取消率的增加(17.0%对34.4%,P < 0.001),多胎妊娠率的急剧下降(25.6%对4.9%,P < 0.001)以及受刺激试管婴儿周期中每个新鲜胚胎移植的活产率下降(32.3%对25.5%,P < 0.001)有关。虽然刺激试管婴儿的活产率下降了,但由于该覆盖范围,有9000多名婴儿出生。从这一经验中吸取的教训可以帮助制定一个在财政上更负责任的规划,仍然有助于获得试管婴儿护理。
{"title":"Impact of government health coverage for ART: The results of a 5-year experience in Quebec","authors":"F. Bissonnette ,&nbsp;S. Phillips ,&nbsp;J. Sampalis ,&nbsp;E.M. Dahdouh ,&nbsp;P. St-Michel ,&nbsp;W. Buckett ,&nbsp;I.J. Kadoch ,&nbsp;N. Mahutte","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2019.01.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2019.01.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An analysis of national registry data for 5 years of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) funding in Quebec, Canada was compared with the previous complete year of non-funded IVF cycles, as well as the first complete year following the end of funding. The number of cycles, livebirth rates, age group of patients treated, use of donor gametes, multiple pregnancy rates and cycle cancellation rates were assessed. The total number of IVF cycles performed increased dramatically during the funded period, averaging over 10,000 cycles per year. There was no change in the age group distribution of patients treated, but less egg donation was performed. Interestingly, funding was also associated with an increase in the IVF cycle cancellation rate (17.0% versus 34.4%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), a dramatic decline in the multiple pregnancy rate (25.6% versus 4.9%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and a decline in the livebirth rate per fresh embryo transfer in stimulated IVF cycles (32.3% versus 25.5%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Although the livebirth rate for stimulated IVF declined, over 9000 babies were born as a result of the coverage. Lessons learned from this experience could help develop a more fiscally responsible programme that still facilitates access to IVF care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 32-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2019.01.002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37342379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Managing absence and presence of child–parent resemblance: a challenge for heterosexual couples following sperm donation 处理亲子相似性的缺失和存在:捐献精子后异性恋夫妇面临的挑战
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.07.001
Stina Isaksson , Gunilla Sydsjö , Agneta Skoog Svanberg , Claudia Lampic

This qualitative interview study sought to gather and better understand heterosexual parents' experiences of managing resemblance and non-resemblance between child and parent in an identity-release donor programme. The study is part of the prospective longitudinal Swedish Study on Gamete Donation (SSGD), including all fertility clinics performing gamete donation in Sweden. A sample of participants in the SSGD, consisting of 30 heterosexual parents with children aged 7–8 years following identity-release sperm donation, participated in individual semi-structured interviews. This study concerns a secondary analysis of the interview data. The results show how donor-conceiving parents experience the presence and absence of child–parent resemblance, and how they navigate between the importance of genetic connectedness and of ‘doing parenthood’ through social interactions. The analysis resulted in three categories: ‘resemblance through nature or nurture’, ‘non-resemblance brings the donor to the front’ and ‘feelings about and coping with resemblance talk’. The first two categories deal with the intrapersonal aspects of physical and non-physical resemblance, while the last category includes aspects of resemblance in relation to persons outside the core family. The presence or absence of parent–child resemblance regarding both physical and non-physical characteristics appears to constitute a considerable challenge for heterosexual couples with school-aged children following sperm donation.

本定性访谈研究旨在收集和更好地了解异性恋父母在身份释放供体项目中管理孩子与父母之间相似和不相似的经历。该研究是瑞典配子捐赠前瞻性纵向研究(SSGD)的一部分,包括瑞典所有进行配子捐赠的生育诊所。SSGD的参与者样本包括30对异性恋父母,他们的孩子年龄在7-8岁 ,他们在身份释放精子捐赠后参加了单独的半结构化访谈。本研究涉及对访谈数据的二次分析。研究结果显示了捐赠者怀孕的父母如何体验孩子与父母之间的相似性,以及他们如何在基因联系和通过社会互动“做父母”的重要性之间进行导航。分析结果分为三类:“天生或后天的相似”、“不相似使捐赠者脱颖而出”和“对相似谈话的感受和应对”。前两个类别涉及身体和非身体相似的人际方面,而最后一个类别包括与核心家庭以外的人的相似方面。对于有学龄子女的异性夫妇来说,在生理和非生理特征上是否存在相似之处似乎构成了一个相当大的挑战。
{"title":"Managing absence and presence of child–parent resemblance: a challenge for heterosexual couples following sperm donation","authors":"Stina Isaksson ,&nbsp;Gunilla Sydsjö ,&nbsp;Agneta Skoog Svanberg ,&nbsp;Claudia Lampic","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2019.07.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2019.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This qualitative interview study sought to gather and better understand heterosexual parents' experiences of managing resemblance and non-resemblance between child and parent in an identity-release donor programme. The study is part of the prospective longitudinal Swedish Study on Gamete Donation (SSGD), including all fertility clinics performing gamete donation in Sweden. A sample of participants in the SSGD, consisting of 30 heterosexual parents with children aged 7–8 years following identity-release sperm donation, participated in individual semi-structured interviews. This study concerns a secondary analysis of the interview data. The results show how donor-conceiving parents experience the presence and absence of child–parent resemblance, and how they navigate between the importance of genetic connectedness and of ‘doing parenthood’ through social interactions. The analysis resulted in three categories: ‘resemblance through nature or nurture’, ‘non-resemblance brings the donor to the front’ and ‘feelings about and coping with resemblance talk’. The first two categories deal with the intrapersonal aspects of physical and non-physical resemblance, while the last category includes aspects of resemblance in relation to persons outside the core family. The presence or absence of parent–child resemblance regarding both physical and non-physical characteristics appears to constitute a considerable challenge for heterosexual couples with school-aged children following sperm donation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 38-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2019.07.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42665253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Being questioned as parents: An interview study with Swedish commissioning parents using transnational surrogacy 作为父母被质疑:对瑞典代孕父母跨国代孕的访谈研究
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.08.001
Anna Arvidsson , Sara Johnsdotter , Maria Emmelin , Birgitta Essén

This study sought to explore how Swedish parents who had commissioned surrogacy abroad experienced the process of parenthood recognition. The study consisted of in-depth interviews with five couples and 10 individuals representing 10 additional couples who had used surrogacy abroad, mainly in India. The construction of motherhood and fatherhood in the Swedish system contradicts how parenthood is defined in the surrogacy process. This study found that the formal recognition of parenthood involved a complex and frustrating process where the presumption of fatherhood and step-child adoption as grounds for parenthood make people feel questioned as parents, negatively affecting parental welfare. Policy makers need to take into account the consequences of an unregulated situation regarding surrogacy, and focus more on the child–parent relationship when regulating surrogacy.

本研究旨在探讨在国外委托代孕的瑞典父母如何经历父母身份认可的过程。该研究包括对5对夫妇和10名代表另外10对在国外(主要在印度)使用代孕的夫妇的个人进行深入访谈。瑞典制度中对母性和父性的建构与代孕过程中对亲子关系的定义相矛盾。这项研究发现,正式承认父母身份是一个复杂而令人沮丧的过程,在这个过程中,假设父亲身份和收养继子女作为父母身份的理由,使人们感到自己作为父母受到质疑,对父母的福利产生负面影响。政策制定者需要考虑到代孕不受监管的后果,并在监管代孕时更多地关注亲子关系。
{"title":"Being questioned as parents: An interview study with Swedish commissioning parents using transnational surrogacy","authors":"Anna Arvidsson ,&nbsp;Sara Johnsdotter ,&nbsp;Maria Emmelin ,&nbsp;Birgitta Essén","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2018.08.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2018.08.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study sought to explore how Swedish parents who had commissioned surrogacy abroad experienced the process of parenthood recognition. The study consisted of in-depth interviews with five couples and 10 individuals representing 10 additional couples who had used surrogacy abroad, mainly in India. The construction of motherhood and fatherhood in the Swedish system contradicts how parenthood is defined in the surrogacy process. This study found that the formal recognition of parenthood involved a complex and frustrating process where the presumption of fatherhood and step-child adoption as grounds for parenthood make people feel questioned as parents, negatively affecting parental welfare. Policy makers need to take into account the consequences of an unregulated situation regarding surrogacy, and focus more on the child–parent relationship when regulating surrogacy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 23-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2018.08.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37089558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
期刊
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1