Abstract
The results of shock-induced turbulent boundary layer separation simulations using scale-resolving methods with wall modelling (WMLES) are presented. A test case is chosen for which experimental data and reference large eddy simulation results are available. The IDDES method based on the SST turbulence model in the WMLES mode is compared with a similar method in which the explicit subgrid scale model is turned off. In the second approach, two schemes of the WENO family are considered. In each case, two grids of different densities are employed. The separation size, pressure, and friction coefficient distributions along the wall, and one-point pressure probability density functions at two reference points are compared. An unexpected result is demonstrated: in all the eddy-resolving simulations, the separation region’s length turns out to be underestimated by 15–28%, and no significant reduction in the error with grid refinement is observed. Possible reasons for this phenomenon are discussed.