Pub Date : 2018-10-01DOI: 10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0007
Maya Lavie-Ajayi, Ora Nakash
This chapter discusses the difficulty faced by therapists when, instead of a story of emotional problems, they are presented in the course of a professional consultation with a narrative about social injustice. The chapter includes a detailed analysis of a single intake session and subsequent post-intake interviews, taken from a large study on intakes in mental health clinics with culturally diverse populations in Israel. The client–subject of this chapter presented herself to a mental health facility, claiming a state of crisis due to the downgrading of her employment status, which she attributed to systematic corporate injustice. During the intake interview, there were a number of disagreements between the client and the therapist. While the client sought to relate a narrative of injustice, the therapist insisted on identifying an illness narrative. This chapter argues that the battle of narratives is a political battle, and highlights the political power wielded by therapists in defining diagnoses and treatment recommendations.
{"title":"An illness narrative or a social injustice narrative?","authors":"Maya Lavie-Ajayi, Ora Nakash","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0007","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses the difficulty faced by therapists when, instead of a story of emotional problems, they are presented in the course of a professional consultation with a narrative about social injustice. The chapter includes a detailed analysis of a single intake session and subsequent post-intake interviews, taken from a large study on intakes in mental health clinics with culturally diverse populations in Israel. The client–subject of this chapter presented herself to a mental health facility, claiming a state of crisis due to the downgrading of her employment status, which she attributed to systematic corporate injustice. During the intake interview, there were a number of disagreements between the client and the therapist. While the client sought to relate a narrative of injustice, the therapist insisted on identifying an illness narrative. This chapter argues that the battle of narratives is a political battle, and highlights the political power wielded by therapists in defining diagnoses and treatment recommendations.","PeriodicalId":381689,"journal":{"name":"Illness Narratives in Practice: Potentials and Challenges of Using Narratives in Health-related Contexts","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115313949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-10-01DOI: 10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0020
Victoria A. Shaffer, B. Zikmund‐Fisher
This chapter maintains that while narratives should be used carefully in health communication, arguments in favour of their use outweigh concerns. The use of narratives in patient decision aids is controversial because of their persuasive power, ability to bias medical decisions, and tendency to proliferate the spread of misinformation. However, this chapter argues that: 1) didactic and statistical information alone are not enough to combat major public health issues; 2) narratives are also an important way that people make sense of data; and 3) narratives provide important contextual information that is essential for decision making. This chapter provides a blueprint for how narratives should be used in public health communications and discusses which narratives would be most efficacious. Finally, this chapter makes the case for a new, integrative model that respects the complementary roles of both data and narrative communications in the design of health communications.
{"title":"Narratives in decision aids","authors":"Victoria A. Shaffer, B. Zikmund‐Fisher","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0020","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter maintains that while narratives should be used carefully in health communication, arguments in favour of their use outweigh concerns. The use of narratives in patient decision aids is controversial because of their persuasive power, ability to bias medical decisions, and tendency to proliferate the spread of misinformation. However, this chapter argues that: 1) didactic and statistical information alone are not enough to combat major public health issues; 2) narratives are also an important way that people make sense of data; and 3) narratives provide important contextual information that is essential for decision making. This chapter provides a blueprint for how narratives should be used in public health communications and discusses which narratives would be most efficacious. Finally, this chapter makes the case for a new, integrative model that respects the complementary roles of both data and narrative communications in the design of health communications.","PeriodicalId":381689,"journal":{"name":"Illness Narratives in Practice: Potentials and Challenges of Using Narratives in Health-related Contexts","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122628712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-10-01DOI: 10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0017
E. Gülich
This chapter argues that illness narratives are a suitable instrument for differential diagnosis in practice. The study discussed is based on a corpus of doctor–patient interactions, i.e., encounters with patients suffering from epileptic or non-epileptic seizures and/or anxiety disorders, and for most of whom differential diagnosis is very difficult. The basic assumption put forward here is that the types of narrative can give clues to identify the types of seizures or attacks. The focus is on the ‘methods’ patients use in verbalizing the ‘auras’ preceding the seizures and the course of the seizures or attacks themselves. In particular, it pays attention to the procedures of resolving difficulties of verbalization, which occur during the production of the narrative. It demonstrates that preferences in the choice of narrative techniques allow a distinction between patients with epileptic seizures and patients with other types of fits or with panic attacks. Finally it suggests that knowledge of recurrent narrative patterns can help to recognize the syndrome presented, on condition that the doctor encourages narrative reconstructions and listens carefully.
{"title":"Using illness narratives in clinical diagnosis","authors":"E. Gülich","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0017","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter argues that illness narratives are a suitable instrument for differential diagnosis in practice. The study discussed is based on a corpus of doctor–patient interactions, i.e., encounters with patients suffering from epileptic or non-epileptic seizures and/or anxiety disorders, and for most of whom differential diagnosis is very difficult. The basic assumption put forward here is that the types of narrative can give clues to identify the types of seizures or attacks. The focus is on the ‘methods’ patients use in verbalizing the ‘auras’ preceding the seizures and the course of the seizures or attacks themselves. In particular, it pays attention to the procedures of resolving difficulties of verbalization, which occur during the production of the narrative. It demonstrates that preferences in the choice of narrative techniques allow a distinction between patients with epileptic seizures and patients with other types of fits or with panic attacks. Finally it suggests that knowledge of recurrent narrative patterns can help to recognize the syndrome presented, on condition that the doctor encourages narrative reconstructions and listens carefully.","PeriodicalId":381689,"journal":{"name":"Illness Narratives in Practice: Potentials and Challenges of Using Narratives in Health-related Contexts","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116749279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-10-01DOI: 10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0004
L. Hydén
Collecting illness narratives has become an established way to explore illness experiences. Often both collecting and analysing illness narratives are based on taken for granted narrative norms about how a narrative should look in order to be counted as a narrative and as researchable. Autobiographical illness stories are for instance generally supposed to be coherent and true. Many persons, especially with neurocognitive disorders, have problems living up to and adhere to these narrative norms, thus telling stories that risk being considered as non-stories or as incoherent and fragmented stories. A number of examples of conflicts between narrative norms and illness stories will be discussed. In conclusion, it is argued that researchers must use data collecting methods as well as analytical strategies that allow for alternative ways of telling stories.
{"title":"Stories, illness, and narrative norms","authors":"L. Hydén","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0004","url":null,"abstract":"Collecting illness narratives has become an established way to explore illness experiences. Often both collecting and analysing illness narratives are based on taken for granted narrative norms about how a narrative should look in order to be counted as a narrative and as researchable. Autobiographical illness stories are for instance generally supposed to be coherent and true. Many persons, especially with neurocognitive disorders, have problems living up to and adhere to these narrative norms, thus telling stories that risk being considered as non-stories or as incoherent and fragmented stories. A number of examples of conflicts between narrative norms and illness stories will be discussed. In conclusion, it is argued that researchers must use data collecting methods as well as analytical strategies that allow for alternative ways of telling stories.","PeriodicalId":381689,"journal":{"name":"Illness Narratives in Practice: Potentials and Challenges of Using Narratives in Health-related Contexts","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126527616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-10-01DOI: 10.1093/med/9780198806660.003.0015
Chris Heape, H. Larsen, Merja Ryöppy
This chapter describes how improvised participatory theatre can be used to encourage change in professional healthcare practice. It focuses on chronic pain, with a brief example from another healthcare project. The principal interest is to demonstrate how theatre processes, for the most carried out as participatory workshops, can be used to explore and influence healthcare practice. The chapter shows how health and illness narratives can be considered temporal, improvised, and performative phenomena that are narrated to life through actual practice. The idea is that narratives of practice emerge from the dynamic, moment-to-moment, and reflexive engagement with actual practice rather than as idealized or generalized accounts about practice. The emphasis is therefore on engendering narratives of practice as a narrating-between-people in a situation as opposed to considering narratives as after-the-fact accounts.
{"title":"Engaging the vulnerable encounter","authors":"Chris Heape, H. Larsen, Merja Ryöppy","doi":"10.1093/med/9780198806660.003.0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198806660.003.0015","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter describes how improvised participatory theatre can be used to encourage change in professional healthcare practice. It focuses on chronic pain, with a brief example from another healthcare project. The principal interest is to demonstrate how theatre processes, for the most carried out as participatory workshops, can be used to explore and influence healthcare practice. The chapter shows how health and illness narratives can be considered temporal, improvised, and performative phenomena that are narrated to life through actual practice. The idea is that narratives of practice emerge from the dynamic, moment-to-moment, and reflexive engagement with actual practice rather than as idealized or generalized accounts about practice. The emphasis is therefore on engendering narratives of practice as a narrating-between-people in a situation as opposed to considering narratives as after-the-fact accounts.","PeriodicalId":381689,"journal":{"name":"Illness Narratives in Practice: Potentials and Challenges of Using Narratives in Health-related Contexts","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131232736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-10-01DOI: 10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0022
S. Law, Ilja Ormel, David Loutfi, J. Lavis
Individual narratives about patient/family experiences of illness, and needs for information and support, can exert a powerful influence on policy formulation, particularly when a sensational story captures the attention of the media or general public. In this chapter, we situate the use and potential value of the narrative evidence within the messy world of policy making when trying to privilege evidence that brings diversity of voice and experiences on a topic, rather than individual stories. We explore the challenges associated with this type of experiential evidence, and the gap in translating such evidence to decision makers. We argue that both researchers and policy makers would benefit from a deeper understanding of each other’s worlds, and present examples of strategies to bridge this gap. We conclude by offering advice for policy makers regarding communication of their needs for experiential evidence, and advice for qualitative researchers regarding the translation of narrative-based findings for policy.
{"title":"Illness narratives as evidence for healthcare policy","authors":"S. Law, Ilja Ormel, David Loutfi, J. Lavis","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0022","url":null,"abstract":"Individual narratives about patient/family experiences of illness, and needs for information and support, can exert a powerful influence on policy formulation, particularly when a sensational story captures the attention of the media or general public. In this chapter, we situate the use and potential value of the narrative evidence within the messy world of policy making when trying to privilege evidence that brings diversity of voice and experiences on a topic, rather than individual stories. We explore the challenges associated with this type of experiential evidence, and the gap in translating such evidence to decision makers. We argue that both researchers and policy makers would benefit from a deeper understanding of each other’s worlds, and present examples of strategies to bridge this gap. We conclude by offering advice for policy makers regarding communication of their needs for experiential evidence, and advice for qualitative researchers regarding the translation of narrative-based findings for policy.","PeriodicalId":381689,"journal":{"name":"Illness Narratives in Practice: Potentials and Challenges of Using Narratives in Health-related Contexts","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131423010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-10-01DOI: 10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0025
E. Miller, A. Fleischmann
The use of medications for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been strongly debated because medications may alter the individual’s sense of authenticity. This chapter examines online forums that include young people’s experiences with ADHD medications, their sense of control over medication use, and the drugs’ effects on their sense of authenticity. It discusses the analysis of four Internet forums dedicated to ADHD issues using an ethnographic-discursive approach, and demonstrates that the results suggest there are two types of competing narratives—those of the young people, who express doubts about taking medications due to their effect on various psychological characteristics and especially on their sense of authenticity, and those of professionals, who uphold the medical perspective that regardless of the medications’ effects they are still the best option for treating ADHD. It covers how the clash between these two competing narratives resonates a more general struggle of people with disabilities for their rights. Finally, it discusses how social media echoes the struggle between individuals with disabilities and the establishment’s view of ADHD as a medical condition which should be treated accordingly, even at the cost of losing the individual’s authenticity.
{"title":"Changes in authenticity","authors":"E. Miller, A. Fleischmann","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0025","url":null,"abstract":"The use of medications for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been strongly debated because medications may alter the individual’s sense of authenticity. This chapter examines online forums that include young people’s experiences with ADHD medications, their sense of control over medication use, and the drugs’ effects on their sense of authenticity. It discusses the analysis of four Internet forums dedicated to ADHD issues using an ethnographic-discursive approach, and demonstrates that the results suggest there are two types of competing narratives—those of the young people, who express doubts about taking medications due to their effect on various psychological characteristics and especially on their sense of authenticity, and those of professionals, who uphold the medical perspective that regardless of the medications’ effects they are still the best option for treating ADHD. It covers how the clash between these two competing narratives resonates a more general struggle of people with disabilities for their rights. Finally, it discusses how social media echoes the struggle between individuals with disabilities and the establishment’s view of ADHD as a medical condition which should be treated accordingly, even at the cost of losing the individual’s authenticity.","PeriodicalId":381689,"journal":{"name":"Illness Narratives in Practice: Potentials and Challenges of Using Narratives in Health-related Contexts","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124930064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-10-01DOI: 10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0002
G. Lucius-Hoene, M. Breuning, C. Helfferich
Illness narratives—first-person stories about experiences with illness—have become highly popular as research data and as practical instruments, and are used and exploited in many health-related contexts. However, their epistemological properties and problems concerning the relation of their content to events and realities are often neglected when these stories are taken as direct representations of what happened. This chapter exposes why the reflection of these properties and their relation to their use in research or practical contexts is crucial. It expands on three different approaches of handling the epistemological and methodical questions: a ‘naturalistic’ approach, an experiential approach, and a performative approach. Each approach demands different criteria and guidelines to deal with the questions of truth or authenticity as well as with the observance of their context of origin according to the purposes users have in mind.
{"title":"Illness narratives in practice","authors":"G. Lucius-Hoene, M. Breuning, C. Helfferich","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0002","url":null,"abstract":"Illness narratives—first-person stories about experiences with illness—have become highly popular as research data and as practical instruments, and are used and exploited in many health-related contexts. However, their epistemological properties and problems concerning the relation of their content to events and realities are often neglected when these stories are taken as direct representations of what happened. This chapter exposes why the reflection of these properties and their relation to their use in research or practical contexts is crucial. It expands on three different approaches of handling the epistemological and methodical questions: a ‘naturalistic’ approach, an experiential approach, and a performative approach. Each approach demands different criteria and guidelines to deal with the questions of truth or authenticity as well as with the observance of their context of origin according to the purposes users have in mind.","PeriodicalId":381689,"journal":{"name":"Illness Narratives in Practice: Potentials and Challenges of Using Narratives in Health-related Contexts","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129135251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-10-01DOI: 10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0008
S. Corsten, Friedericke Hardering
Recent research in the field of narrative-based medicine has investigated the effectiveness of using illness narratives to stimulate coping processes. This chapter examines the utilization of the narrative approach in treating persons with aphasia—a neurological language disorder—many of whom experience reduced social participation and a change in identity. Although life-story work can support processes of sense-making, only a few studies use a biographic–narrative approach in aphasic patients due to their impaired language abilities. The chapter describes an adapted biographic-narrative intervention developed to assist with identity renegotiation and social participation. In order to show the benefits associated with the intervention and how the participants’ sense of self changed through the approach, the chapter examines a study with 27 aphasic people. It covers how the findings provide foundations for future work using biographic–narrative interventions to influence quality of life and identity renegotiation in people with chronic diseases.
{"title":"Retelling one’s life story—how narratives improve quality of life in chronic language impairment","authors":"S. Corsten, Friedericke Hardering","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780198806660.003.0008","url":null,"abstract":"Recent research in the field of narrative-based medicine has investigated the effectiveness of using illness narratives to stimulate coping processes. This chapter examines the utilization of the narrative approach in treating persons with aphasia—a neurological language disorder—many of whom experience reduced social participation and a change in identity. Although life-story work can support processes of sense-making, only a few studies use a biographic–narrative approach in aphasic patients due to their impaired language abilities. The chapter describes an adapted biographic-narrative intervention developed to assist with identity renegotiation and social participation. In order to show the benefits associated with the intervention and how the participants’ sense of self changed through the approach, the chapter examines a study with 27 aphasic people. It covers how the findings provide foundations for future work using biographic–narrative interventions to influence quality of life and identity renegotiation in people with chronic diseases.","PeriodicalId":381689,"journal":{"name":"Illness Narratives in Practice: Potentials and Challenges of Using Narratives in Health-related Contexts","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128126961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-10-01DOI: 10.1093/med/9780198806660.003.0021
L. Hinton, L. Locock, S. Ziebland
This chapter explores the variety of ways in which people’s narrative accounts of their health experiences can be harnessed to inform practice, service development, and health policy, as well as a more traditional research agenda. The case has been made that collecting data on patient experience as an activity in isolation is not enough. Health experiences should be used to improve care. But what are the most effective ways to achieve this? This chapter presents examples of projects conducted in the United Kingdom where patient narratives collected as part of the Healthtalk project (www.healthtalk.org) were used for health service improvement. Examples include secondary analysis, and co-design projects using experience based co-design and an accelerated approach to co-design.
{"title":"Understanding and using health experiences to improve healthcare—examples from the United Kingdom","authors":"L. Hinton, L. Locock, S. Ziebland","doi":"10.1093/med/9780198806660.003.0021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198806660.003.0021","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the variety of ways in which people’s narrative accounts of their health experiences can be harnessed to inform practice, service development, and health policy, as well as a more traditional research agenda. The case has been made that collecting data on patient experience as an activity in isolation is not enough. Health experiences should be used to improve care. But what are the most effective ways to achieve this? This chapter presents examples of projects conducted in the United Kingdom where patient narratives collected as part of the Healthtalk project (www.healthtalk.org) were used for health service improvement. Examples include secondary analysis, and co-design projects using experience based co-design and an accelerated approach to co-design.","PeriodicalId":381689,"journal":{"name":"Illness Narratives in Practice: Potentials and Challenges of Using Narratives in Health-related Contexts","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125134568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：