Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_16
Ishita Singh, Tanmay P Lele
Irregularities in nuclear shape and/or alterations to nuclear size are a hallmark of malignancy in a broad range of cancer types. Though these abnormalities are commonly used for diagnostic purposes and are often used to assess cancer progression in the clinic, the mechanisms through which they occur are not well understood. Nuclear size alterations in cancer could potentially arise from aneuploidy, changes in osmotic coupling with the cytoplasm, and perturbations to nucleocytoplasmic transport. Nuclear shape changes may occur due to alterations to cell-generated mechanical stresses and/or alterations to nuclear structural components, which balance those stresses, such as the nuclear lamina and chromatin. A better understanding of the mechanisms underlying abnormal nuclear morphology and size may allow the development of new therapeutics to target nuclear aberrations in cancer.
{"title":"Nuclear Morphological Abnormalities in Cancer: A Search for Unifying Mechanisms.","authors":"Ishita Singh, Tanmay P Lele","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_16","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Irregularities in nuclear shape and/or alterations to nuclear size are a hallmark of malignancy in a broad range of cancer types. Though these abnormalities are commonly used for diagnostic purposes and are often used to assess cancer progression in the clinic, the mechanisms through which they occur are not well understood. Nuclear size alterations in cancer could potentially arise from aneuploidy, changes in osmotic coupling with the cytoplasm, and perturbations to nucleocytoplasmic transport. Nuclear shape changes may occur due to alterations to cell-generated mechanical stresses and/or alterations to nuclear structural components, which balance those stresses, such as the nuclear lamina and chromatin. A better understanding of the mechanisms underlying abnormal nuclear morphology and size may allow the development of new therapeutics to target nuclear aberrations in cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":39320,"journal":{"name":"Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9722227/pdf/nihms-1852107.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10516705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_5
Sreemol Gokuladhas, Roan E Zaied, William Schierding, Sophie Farrow, Tayaza Fadason, Justin M O'Sullivan
Multimorbidity is characterized by multidimensional complexity emerging from interactions between multiple diseases across levels of biological (including genetic) and environmental determinants and the complex array of interactions between and within cells, tissues and organ systems. Advances in spatial genomic research have led to an unprecedented expansion in our ability to link alterations in genome folding with changes that are associated with human disease. Studying disease-associated genetic variants in the context of the spatial genome has enabled the discovery of transcriptional regulatory programmes that potentially link dysregulated genes to disease development. However, the approaches that have been used have typically been applied to uncover pathological molecular mechanisms occurring in a specific disease-relevant tissue. These forms of reductionist, targeted investigations are not appropriate for the molecular dissection of multimorbidity that typically involves contributions from multiple tissues. In this perspective, we emphasize the importance of a whole-body understanding of multimorbidity and discuss how spatial genomics, when integrated with additional omic datasets, could provide novel insights into the molecular underpinnings of multimorbidity.
{"title":"Integrating Multimorbidity into a Whole-Body Understanding of Disease Using Spatial Genomics.","authors":"Sreemol Gokuladhas, Roan E Zaied, William Schierding, Sophie Farrow, Tayaza Fadason, Justin M O'Sullivan","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multimorbidity is characterized by multidimensional complexity emerging from interactions between multiple diseases across levels of biological (including genetic) and environmental determinants and the complex array of interactions between and within cells, tissues and organ systems. Advances in spatial genomic research have led to an unprecedented expansion in our ability to link alterations in genome folding with changes that are associated with human disease. Studying disease-associated genetic variants in the context of the spatial genome has enabled the discovery of transcriptional regulatory programmes that potentially link dysregulated genes to disease development. However, the approaches that have been used have typically been applied to uncover pathological molecular mechanisms occurring in a specific disease-relevant tissue. These forms of reductionist, targeted investigations are not appropriate for the molecular dissection of multimorbidity that typically involves contributions from multiple tissues. In this perspective, we emphasize the importance of a whole-body understanding of multimorbidity and discuss how spatial genomics, when integrated with additional omic datasets, could provide novel insights into the molecular underpinnings of multimorbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":39320,"journal":{"name":"Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40672118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_8
Takahiro Sakaue, Akatsuki Kimura
Genomic DNA, which controls genetic information, is stored in the cell nucleus in eukaryotes. Chromatin moves dynamically in the nucleus, and this movement is closely related to the function of chromatin. However, the driving force of chromatin movement, its control mechanism, and the functional significance of movement are unclear. In addition to biochemical and genetic approaches such as identification and analysis of regulators, approaches based on the physical properties of chromatin and cell nuclei are indispensable for this understanding. In particular, the idea of polymer physics is expected to be effective. This paper introduces our efforts to combine biological experiments on chromatin kinetics with theoretical analysis based on polymer physics.
{"title":"Scaling Relationship in Chromatin as a Polymer.","authors":"Takahiro Sakaue, Akatsuki Kimura","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genomic DNA, which controls genetic information, is stored in the cell nucleus in eukaryotes. Chromatin moves dynamically in the nucleus, and this movement is closely related to the function of chromatin. However, the driving force of chromatin movement, its control mechanism, and the functional significance of movement are unclear. In addition to biochemical and genetic approaches such as identification and analysis of regulators, approaches based on the physical properties of chromatin and cell nuclei are indispensable for this understanding. In particular, the idea of polymer physics is expected to be effective. This paper introduces our efforts to combine biological experiments on chromatin kinetics with theoretical analysis based on polymer physics.</p>","PeriodicalId":39320,"journal":{"name":"Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40672119","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_22
Syed Raza Mahmood, Nadine Hosny El Said, Piergiorgio Percipalle
In the cell nucleus, actin participates in numerous essential processes. Actin is involved in chromatin as part of specific ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes and associates with the RNA polymerase machinery to regulate transcription at multiple levels. Emerging evidence has also shown that the nuclear actin pool controls the architecture of the mammalian genome playing an important role in its hierarchical organization into transcriptionally active and repressed compartments, contributing to the clustering of RNA polymerase II into transcriptional hubs. Here, we review the most recent literature and discuss how actin involvement in genome organization impacts the regulation of gene programs that are activated or repressed during differentiation and development. As in the cytoplasm, we propose that nuclear actin is involved in key nuclear tasks in complex with different types of actin-binding proteins that regulate actin function and bridge interactions between actin and various nuclear components.
{"title":"The Role of Nuclear Actin in Genome Organization and Gene Expression Regulation During Differentiation.","authors":"Syed Raza Mahmood, Nadine Hosny El Said, Piergiorgio Percipalle","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_22","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the cell nucleus, actin participates in numerous essential processes. Actin is involved in chromatin as part of specific ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes and associates with the RNA polymerase machinery to regulate transcription at multiple levels. Emerging evidence has also shown that the nuclear actin pool controls the architecture of the mammalian genome playing an important role in its hierarchical organization into transcriptionally active and repressed compartments, contributing to the clustering of RNA polymerase II into transcriptional hubs. Here, we review the most recent literature and discuss how actin involvement in genome organization impacts the regulation of gene programs that are activated or repressed during differentiation and development. As in the cytoplasm, we propose that nuclear actin is involved in key nuclear tasks in complex with different types of actin-binding proteins that regulate actin function and bridge interactions between actin and various nuclear components.</p>","PeriodicalId":39320,"journal":{"name":"Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40673012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_18
Tobias A Knoch
The three-dimensional architecture of chromosomes, their arrangement, and dynamics within cell nuclei are still subject of debate. Obviously, the function of genomes-the storage, replication, and transcription of genetic information-has closely coevolved with this architecture and its dynamics, and hence are closely connected. In this work a scale-bridging framework investigates how of the 30 nm chromatin fibre organizes into chromosomes including their arrangement and morphology in the simulation of whole nuclei. Therefore, mainly two different topologies were simulated with corresponding parameter variations and comparing them to experiments: The Multi-Loop-Subcompartment (MLS) model, in which (stable) small loops form (stable) rosettes, connected by chromatin linkers, and the Random-Walk/Giant-Loop (RW/GL) model, in which large loops are attached to a flexible non-protein backbone, were simulated for various loop and linker sizes. The 30 nm chromatin fibre was modelled as a polymer chain with stretching, bending and excluded volume interactions. A spherical boundary potential simulated the confinement to nuclei with different radii. Simulated annealing and Brownian Dynamics methods were applied in a four-step decondensation procedure to generate from metaphase decondensated interphase configurations at thermodynamical equilibrium. Both the MLS and the RW/GL models form chromosome territories, with different morphologies: The MLS rosettes result in distinct subchromosomal domains visible in electron and confocal laser scanning microscopic images. In contrast, the big RW/GL loops lead to a mostly homogeneous chromatin distribution. Even small changes of the model parameters induced significant rearrangements of the chromatin morphology. The low overlap of chromosomes, arms, and subchromosomal domains observed in experiments agrees only with the MLS model. The chromatin density distribution in CLSM image stacks reveals a bimodal behaviour in agreement with recent experiments. Combination of these results with a variety of (spatial distance) measurements favour an MLS like model with loops and linkers of 63 to 126 kbp. The predicted large spaces between the chromatin fibres allow typically sized biological molecules to reach nearly every location in the nucleus by moderately obstructed diffusion and is in disagreement with the much simplified assumption that defined channels between territories for molecular transport as in the Interchromosomal Domain (ICD) hypothesis exist and are necessary for transport. All this is also in agreement with recent selective high-resolution chromosome interaction capture (T2C) experiments, the scaling behaviour of the DNA sequence, the dynamics of the chromatin fibre, the diffusion of molecules, and other measurements. Also all other chromosome topologies can in principle be excluded. In summary, polymer simulations of whole nuclei compared to experimental data not only clearly favour only a stable loop aggre
{"title":"Simulation of Different Three-Dimensional Models of Whole Interphase Nuclei Compared to Experiments - A Consistent Scale-Bridging Simulation Framework for Genome Organization.","authors":"Tobias A Knoch","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_18","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_18","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The three-dimensional architecture of chromosomes, their arrangement, and dynamics within cell nuclei are still subject of debate. Obviously, the function of genomes-the storage, replication, and transcription of genetic information-has closely coevolved with this architecture and its dynamics, and hence are closely connected. In this work a scale-bridging framework investigates how of the 30 nm chromatin fibre organizes into chromosomes including their arrangement and morphology in the simulation of whole nuclei. Therefore, mainly two different topologies were simulated with corresponding parameter variations and comparing them to experiments: The Multi-Loop-Subcompartment (MLS) model, in which (stable) small loops form (stable) rosettes, connected by chromatin linkers, and the Random-Walk/Giant-Loop (RW/GL) model, in which large loops are attached to a flexible non-protein backbone, were simulated for various loop and linker sizes. The 30 nm chromatin fibre was modelled as a polymer chain with stretching, bending and excluded volume interactions. A spherical boundary potential simulated the confinement to nuclei with different radii. Simulated annealing and Brownian Dynamics methods were applied in a four-step decondensation procedure to generate from metaphase decondensated interphase configurations at thermodynamical equilibrium. Both the MLS and the RW/GL models form chromosome territories, with different morphologies: The MLS rosettes result in distinct subchromosomal domains visible in electron and confocal laser scanning microscopic images. In contrast, the big RW/GL loops lead to a mostly homogeneous chromatin distribution. Even small changes of the model parameters induced significant rearrangements of the chromatin morphology. The low overlap of chromosomes, arms, and subchromosomal domains observed in experiments agrees only with the MLS model. The chromatin density distribution in CLSM image stacks reveals a bimodal behaviour in agreement with recent experiments. Combination of these results with a variety of (spatial distance) measurements favour an MLS like model with loops and linkers of 63 to 126 kbp. The predicted large spaces between the chromatin fibres allow typically sized biological molecules to reach nearly every location in the nucleus by moderately obstructed diffusion and is in disagreement with the much simplified assumption that defined channels between territories for molecular transport as in the Interchromosomal Domain (ICD) hypothesis exist and are necessary for transport. All this is also in agreement with recent selective high-resolution chromosome interaction capture (T2C) experiments, the scaling behaviour of the DNA sequence, the dynamics of the chromatin fibre, the diffusion of molecules, and other measurements. Also all other chromosome topologies can in principle be excluded. In summary, polymer simulations of whole nuclei compared to experimental data not only clearly favour only a stable loop aggre","PeriodicalId":39320,"journal":{"name":"Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40673080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_12
Andrew J Fritz, Mohammed El Dika, Rabail H Toor, Princess D Rodriguez, Stephen J Foley, Rahim Ullah, Daijing Nie, Bodhisattwa Banerjee, Dorcas Lohese, Kirsten M Tracy, Karen C Glass, Seth Frietze, Prachi N Ghule, Jessica L Heath, Anthony N Imbalzano, Andre van Wijnen, Jonathan Gordon, Jane B Lian, Janet L Stein, Gary S Stein
Epigenetic gene regulatory mechanisms play a central role in the biological control of cell and tissue structure, function, and phenotype. Identification of epigenetic dysregulation in cancer provides mechanistic into tumor initiation and progression and may prove valuable for a variety of clinical applications. We present an overview of epigenetically driven mechanisms that are obligatory for physiological regulation and parameters of epigenetic control that are modified in tumor cells. The interrelationship between nuclear structure and function is not mutually exclusive but synergistic. We explore concepts influencing the maintenance of chromatin structures, including phase separation, recognition signals, factors that mediate enhancer-promoter looping, and insulation and how these are altered during the cell cycle and in cancer. Understanding how these processes are altered in cancer provides a potential for advancing capabilities for the diagnosis and identification of novel therapeutic targets.
{"title":"Epigenetic-Mediated Regulation of Gene Expression for Biological Control and Cancer: Cell and Tissue Structure, Function, and Phenotype.","authors":"Andrew J Fritz, Mohammed El Dika, Rabail H Toor, Princess D Rodriguez, Stephen J Foley, Rahim Ullah, Daijing Nie, Bodhisattwa Banerjee, Dorcas Lohese, Kirsten M Tracy, Karen C Glass, Seth Frietze, Prachi N Ghule, Jessica L Heath, Anthony N Imbalzano, Andre van Wijnen, Jonathan Gordon, Jane B Lian, Janet L Stein, Gary S Stein","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_12","DOIUrl":"10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_12","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epigenetic gene regulatory mechanisms play a central role in the biological control of cell and tissue structure, function, and phenotype. Identification of epigenetic dysregulation in cancer provides mechanistic into tumor initiation and progression and may prove valuable for a variety of clinical applications. We present an overview of epigenetically driven mechanisms that are obligatory for physiological regulation and parameters of epigenetic control that are modified in tumor cells. The interrelationship between nuclear structure and function is not mutually exclusive but synergistic. We explore concepts influencing the maintenance of chromatin structures, including phase separation, recognition signals, factors that mediate enhancer-promoter looping, and insulation and how these are altered during the cell cycle and in cancer. Understanding how these processes are altered in cancer provides a potential for advancing capabilities for the diagnosis and identification of novel therapeutic targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":39320,"journal":{"name":"Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9753575/pdf/nihms-1850294.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10516708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_13
Mohammed El Dika, Andrew J Fritz, Rabail H Toor, Princess D Rodriguez, Stephen J Foley, Rahim Ullah, Daijing Nie, Bodhisattwa Banerjee, Dorcas Lohese, Kirsten M Tracy, Karen C Glass, Seth Frietze, Prachi N Ghule, Jessica L Heath, Anthony N Imbalzano, Andre van Wijnen, Jonathan Gordon, Jane B Lian, Janet L Stein, Gary S Stein
The cell cycle is governed by stringent epigenetic mechanisms that, in response to intrinsic and extrinsic regulatory cues, support fidelity of DNA replication and cell division. We will focus on (1) the complex and interdependent processes that are obligatory for control of proliferation and compromised in cancer, (2) epigenetic and topological domains that are associated with distinct phases of the cell cycle that may be altered in cancer initiation and progression, and (3) the requirement for mitotic bookmarking to maintain intranuclear localization of transcriptional regulatory machinery to reinforce cell identity throughout the cell cycle to prevent malignant transformation.
细胞周期受严格的表观遗传机制控制,这些机制响应内在和外在的调控线索,支持 DNA 复制和细胞分裂的保真度。我们将重点关注:(1) 癌症增殖和损害控制所必需的复杂而相互依存的过程;(2) 癌症发生和发展过程中可能改变的与细胞周期不同阶段相关的表观遗传和拓扑结构域;(3) 有丝分裂书签的要求,以维持转录调控机制的核内定位,从而在整个细胞周期中强化细胞特性,防止恶性转化。
{"title":"Epigenetic-Mediated Regulation of Gene Expression for Biological Control and Cancer: Fidelity of Mechanisms Governing the Cell Cycle.","authors":"Mohammed El Dika, Andrew J Fritz, Rabail H Toor, Princess D Rodriguez, Stephen J Foley, Rahim Ullah, Daijing Nie, Bodhisattwa Banerjee, Dorcas Lohese, Kirsten M Tracy, Karen C Glass, Seth Frietze, Prachi N Ghule, Jessica L Heath, Anthony N Imbalzano, Andre van Wijnen, Jonathan Gordon, Jane B Lian, Janet L Stein, Gary S Stein","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_13","DOIUrl":"10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_13","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The cell cycle is governed by stringent epigenetic mechanisms that, in response to intrinsic and extrinsic regulatory cues, support fidelity of DNA replication and cell division. We will focus on (1) the complex and interdependent processes that are obligatory for control of proliferation and compromised in cancer, (2) epigenetic and topological domains that are associated with distinct phases of the cell cycle that may be altered in cancer initiation and progression, and (3) the requirement for mitotic bookmarking to maintain intranuclear localization of transcriptional regulatory machinery to reinforce cell identity throughout the cell cycle to prevent malignant transformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":39320,"journal":{"name":"Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703624/pdf/nihms-1850288.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10516707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_9
Olivia Grace Dobbs, Dawn Coverley
Quiescence is a vital cellular state where cells can reversibly exit the cell cycle and cease proliferation in unfavourable conditions. Cells can undergo multiple transitions in and out of quiescence during their lifetime, and an imbalance in this highly regulated process can promote tumorigenesis and disease. The nucleus experiences vast changes during entry to quiescence, including changes in gene expression and a reduction in size due to increased chromatin compaction. Studies into these changes have highlighted the importance of a core quiescence gene expression programme, reorganisation of nuclear structures, and the action of the condensin complex in creating a stable, quiescent nucleus. However, the underpinning mechanisms behind the formation of a quiescent nucleus are still not fully understood. This chapter explores the current literature surrounding chromatin dynamics during entry to quiescence and the association between quiescence and disease and accentuates the need for further studies to understand this transition. Linking failure to maintain a stable, quiescent state with potential genome instability may help in the advancement of medical interventions for a range of diseases, including cancer.
{"title":"Chromatin Dynamics During Entry to Quiescence and Compromised Functionality in Cancer Cells.","authors":"Olivia Grace Dobbs, Dawn Coverley","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quiescence is a vital cellular state where cells can reversibly exit the cell cycle and cease proliferation in unfavourable conditions. Cells can undergo multiple transitions in and out of quiescence during their lifetime, and an imbalance in this highly regulated process can promote tumorigenesis and disease. The nucleus experiences vast changes during entry to quiescence, including changes in gene expression and a reduction in size due to increased chromatin compaction. Studies into these changes have highlighted the importance of a core quiescence gene expression programme, reorganisation of nuclear structures, and the action of the condensin complex in creating a stable, quiescent nucleus. However, the underpinning mechanisms behind the formation of a quiescent nucleus are still not fully understood. This chapter explores the current literature surrounding chromatin dynamics during entry to quiescence and the association between quiescence and disease and accentuates the need for further studies to understand this transition. Linking failure to maintain a stable, quiescent state with potential genome instability may help in the advancement of medical interventions for a range of diseases, including cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":39320,"journal":{"name":"Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40672120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_11
Tomoyo Takata, Miki Matsumura
Mechanical forces play pivotal roles in directing cell functions and fate. To elicit gene expression, either intrinsic or extrinsic mechanical information are transmitted into the nucleus beyond the nuclear envelope via at least two distinct pathways, possibly more. The first and well-known pathway utilizes the canonical nuclear transport of mechanoresponsive transcriptional regulators through the nuclear pore complex, which is an exclusive route for macromolecular trafficking between the cytoplasm and nucleoplasm. The second pathway depends on the linker of the nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex, which is a molecular bridge traversing the nuclear envelope between the cytoskeleton and nucleoskeleton. This protein complex is a central component in mechanotransduction at the nuclear envelope that transmits mechanical information from the cytoskeleton into the nucleus to influence the nuclear structure, nuclear stiffness, chromatin organization, and gene expression. Besides the mechanical force transducing function, recent increasing evidence shows that the LINC complex plays a role in controlling nucleocytoplasmic transport of mechanoresponsive transcriptional regulators. Here we discuss recent findings regarding the contribution of the LINC complex to the regulation of intracellular localization of the most-notable mechanosensitive transcriptional regulators, β-catenin, YAP, and TAZ.
{"title":"The LINC Complex Assists the Nuclear Import of Mechanosensitive Transcriptional Regulators.","authors":"Tomoyo Takata, Miki Matsumura","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_11","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mechanical forces play pivotal roles in directing cell functions and fate. To elicit gene expression, either intrinsic or extrinsic mechanical information are transmitted into the nucleus beyond the nuclear envelope via at least two distinct pathways, possibly more. The first and well-known pathway utilizes the canonical nuclear transport of mechanoresponsive transcriptional regulators through the nuclear pore complex, which is an exclusive route for macromolecular trafficking between the cytoplasm and nucleoplasm. The second pathway depends on the linker of the nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex, which is a molecular bridge traversing the nuclear envelope between the cytoskeleton and nucleoskeleton. This protein complex is a central component in mechanotransduction at the nuclear envelope that transmits mechanical information from the cytoskeleton into the nucleus to influence the nuclear structure, nuclear stiffness, chromatin organization, and gene expression. Besides the mechanical force transducing function, recent increasing evidence shows that the LINC complex plays a role in controlling nucleocytoplasmic transport of mechanoresponsive transcriptional regulators. Here we discuss recent findings regarding the contribution of the LINC complex to the regulation of intracellular localization of the most-notable mechanosensitive transcriptional regulators, β-catenin, YAP, and TAZ.</p>","PeriodicalId":39320,"journal":{"name":"Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40672123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_17
Enkhzaya Batnasan, Sonja Koivukoski, Minttu Kärkkäinen, Leena Latonen
In this chapter, we discuss the nuclear organization and how it responds to different types of stress. A key component in these responses is molecular traffic between the different sub-nucleolar compartments, such as nucleoplasm, chromatin, nucleoli, and various speckle and body compartments. This allows specific repair and response activities in locations where they normally are not active and serve to halt sensitive functions until the stress insult passes and inflicted damage has been repaired. We focus on mammalian cells and their nuclear organization, especially describing the central role of the nucleolus in nuclear stress responses. We describe events after multiple stress types, including DNA damage, various drugs, and toxic compounds, and discuss the involvement of macromolecular traffic between dynamic, phase-separated nuclear organelles and foci. We delineate the key proteins and non-coding RNA in the formation of stress-responsive, non-membranous nuclear organelles, many of which are relevant to the formation of and utilization in cancer treatment.
{"title":"Nuclear Organization in Response to Stress: A Special Focus on Nucleoli.","authors":"Enkhzaya Batnasan, Sonja Koivukoski, Minttu Kärkkäinen, Leena Latonen","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_17","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this chapter, we discuss the nuclear organization and how it responds to different types of stress. A key component in these responses is molecular traffic between the different sub-nucleolar compartments, such as nucleoplasm, chromatin, nucleoli, and various speckle and body compartments. This allows specific repair and response activities in locations where they normally are not active and serve to halt sensitive functions until the stress insult passes and inflicted damage has been repaired. We focus on mammalian cells and their nuclear organization, especially describing the central role of the nucleolus in nuclear stress responses. We describe events after multiple stress types, including DNA damage, various drugs, and toxic compounds, and discuss the involvement of macromolecular traffic between dynamic, phase-separated nuclear organelles and foci. We delineate the key proteins and non-coding RNA in the formation of stress-responsive, non-membranous nuclear organelles, many of which are relevant to the formation of and utilization in cancer treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":39320,"journal":{"name":"Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40673079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}