Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation最新文献

Viruses are vehicles to exchange genetic information and proteins between cells and organisms by infecting their target cells either cell-free, or depending on cell-cell contacts. Several viruses like certain retroviruses or herpesviruses transmit by both mechanisms. However, viruses have also evolved the properties to exchange proteins between cells independent of viral particle formation. This exchange of viral proteins can be directed to target cells prior to infection to interfere with restriction factors and intrinsic immunity, thus, making the target cell prone to infection. However, also bystander cells, e.g. immune cell populations, can be targeted by viral proteins to dampen antiviral responses. Mechanistically, viruses exploit several routes of cell-cell communication to exchange viral proteins like the formation of extracellular vesicles or the formation of long-distance connections like tunneling nanotubes. Although it is known that viral nucleic acids can be transferred between cells as well, this chapter concentrates on viral proteins of human pathogenic viruses covering all Baltimore classes and summarizes our current knowledge on intercellular transport of viral proteins between cells.

Intracellular protozoan pathogens have to negotiate the internal environment of the host cell they find themselves in, as well as manipulate the host cell to ensure their own survival, replication, and dissemination. The transfer of key effector molecules from the pathogen to the host cell is crucial to this interaction and is technically more demanding to study as compared to an extracellular pathogen. While several effector molecules have been identified, the mechanisms and conditions underlying their transfer to the host cell remain partly or entirely unknown. Improvements in experimental systems have revealed tantalizing details of such intercellular transfer, which form the subject of this chapter.

The landscape of exosome research has undergone a significant paradigm shift, with a departure from early conceptions of exosomes as vehicles for cellular waste disposal towards their recognition as integral components of cellular communication with therapeutic potential. This chapter presents an exhaustive elucidation of exosome biology, detailing the processes of exosome biogenesis, release, and uptake, and their pivotal roles in signal transduction, tissue repair, regeneration, and intercellular communication. Additionally, the chapter highlights recent innovations and anticipates future directions in exosome research, emphasizing their applicability in clinical settings. Exosomes have the unique ability to navigate through tissue spaces to enter the circulatory system, positioning them as key players in tissue repair. Their contributory role in various processes of tissue repair, although in the nascent stages of investigation, stands out as a promising area of research. These vesicles function as a complex signaling network for intracellular and organ-level communication, critical in both pathological and physiological contexts. The chapter further explores the tissue-specific functionality of exosomes and underscores the advancements in methodologies for their isolation and purification, which have been instrumental in expanding the scope of exosome research. The differential cargo profiles of exosomes, dependent on their cellular origin, position them as prospective diagnostic biomarkers for tissue damage and regenerative processes. Looking ahead, the trajectory of exosome research is anticipated to bring transformative changes to biomedical fields. This includes advancing diagnostic and prognostic techniques that utilize exosomes as non-invasive biomarkers for a plethora of diseases, such as cancer, neurodegenerative, and cardiovascular conditions. Additionally, engineering exosomes through alterations of their native content or surface properties presents a novel frontier, including the synthesis of artificial or hybrid variants with enhanced functional properties. Concurrently, the ethical and regulatory frameworks surrounding exosome research, particularly in clinical translation, will require thorough deliberation. In conclusion, the diverse aspects of exosome research are coalescing to redefine the frontiers of diagnostic and therapeutic methodologies, cementing its importance as a discipline of considerable consequence in the biomedical sciences.

Macrophages are key regulators of tissue repair and fibrosis. Following injury, macrophages undergo marked phenotypic and functional changes to play crucial roles throughout the phases of tissue repair. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, which is the most common fibrosing lung disease, has been described as an aberrant reparative response to repetitive alveolar epithelial injury in a genetically susceptible aging individual. The marked destruction of the lung architecture results from the excessive secretion of extracellular matrix by activated fibroblasts and myofibroblasts. Accumulating evidence suggests that macrophages have a pivotal regulatory role in pulmonary fibrosis. The origins and characteristics of macrophages in the lung and their role in regulating lung homeostasis, repair, and fibrosis are reviewed herein. We discuss recent studies that have employed single-cell RNA-sequencing to improve the identification and characterization of macrophage populations in the context of homeostatic and fibrotic conditions. We also discuss the current understanding of the macrophage-mediated mechanisms underlying the initiation and progression of pulmonary fibrosis, with a focus on the phenotypic and functional changes that aging macrophages acquire and how these changes ultimately contribute to age-related chronic lung diseases.

Plant-parasitic nematodes from the genera Globodera, Heterodera (cyst-forming nematodes), and Meloidogyne (root-knot nematodes) are notorious and serious pests of crops. They cause tremendous economic losses between US $80 and 358 billion a year. Nematodes infect the roots of plants and induce the formation of specialised feeding structures (syncytium and giant cells, respectively) that nourish juveniles and adults of the nematodes. The specialised secretory glands enable nematodes to synthesise and secrete effectors that facilitate migration through root tissues and alter the morphogenetic programme of host cells. The formation of feeding sites is associated with the suppression of plant defence responses and deep reprogramming of the development and metabolism of plant cells.In this chapter, we focus on syncytia induced by the sedentary cyst-forming nematodes and provide an overview of ultrastructural changes that occur in the host roots during syncytium formation in conjunction with the most important molecular changes during compatible and incompatible plant responses to infection with nematodes.

As epiblast cells initiate development into various somatic cells, they undergo a large-scale reorganization, called gastrulation. The gastrulation of the epiblast cells produces three groups of cells: the endoderm layer, the collection of miscellaneous mesodermal tissues, and the ectodermal layer, which includes the neural, epidermal, and associated tissues. Most studies of gastrulation have focused on the formation of the tissues that provide the primary route for cell reorganization, that is, the primitive streak, in the chicken and mouse. In contrast, how gastrulation alters epiblast-derived cells has remained underinvestigated. This chapter highlights the regulation of cell and tissue fate via the gastrulation process. The roles and regulatory functions of neuromesodermal progenitors (NMPs) in the gastrulation process, elucidated in the last decade, are discussed in depth to resolve points of confusion. Chicken and mouse embryos, which form a primitive streak as the site of mesoderm precursor ingression, have been investigated extensively. However, primitive streak formation is an exception, even among amniotes. The roles of gastrulation processes in generating various somatic tissues will be discussed broadly.

The classic conception of tissue regeneration assumed the existence of tissue-proper regeneration stem cells that are set aside during normal tissue development and reserved as stem cells for regeneration. However, modern studies using cell tracing and other approaches have ruled out the presence of regeneration-proper stem cells in most cases in vertebrate tissue regeneration. The only experimentally validated regeneration-dedicated reserve cells are the satellite cells in skeletal muscle (e.g., Michele 2022) (see Sect. 5.2.3 ). Here, we will first discuss examples of large-scale tissue regeneration, liver regeneration in mammals, and lens and limb regeneration in newts. Then, attempts to widen the tissue regeneration capacity in mammals with exogenous transcription factor genes will be reviewed.

Germline cysts are syncytia formed by incomplete cytokinesis of mitotic germline precursors (cystoblasts) in which the cystocytes are interconnected by cytoplasmic bridges, permitting the sharing of molecules and organelles. Among animals, such cysts are a nearly universal feature of spermatogenesis and are also often involved in oogenesis. Recent, elegant studies have demonstrated remarkable similarities in the oogenic cysts of mammals and insects, leading to proposals of widespread conservation of these features among animals. Unfortunately, such claims obscure the well-described diversity of female germline cysts in animals and ignore major taxa in which female germline cysts appear to be absent. In this review, I explore the phylogenetic patterns of oogenic cysts in the animal kingdom, with a focus on the hexapods as an informative example of a clade in which such cysts have been lost, regained, and modified in various ways. My aim is to build on the fascinating insights of recent comparative studies, by calling for a more nuanced view of evolutionary conservation. Female germline cysts in the Metazoa are an example of a phenomenon that-though essential for the continuance of many, diverse animal lineages-nevertheless exhibits intriguing patterns of evolutionary innovation, loss, and convergence.

Pluripotent stem cell lines established from early-stage embryos of mammals or other species represent the embryonic stages before the initiation of somatic development. In these stem cell lines, cell proliferation capacity is maintained while developmental progression is arrested at a specific developmental stage that is determined by the combination of culture conditions, cell state, and species. All of these pluripotent stem cell lines express the transcription factors (TFs) Sox2 and Pou5f1 (Oct3/4); hence, these TFs are often regarded as pluripotency factors. However, the regulatory roles of these TFs vary depending on the cell line type. The cell lines representing preimplantation stage embryonic cells (mouse embryonic stem cells, mESCs) are regulated principally by the combined action of Sox2 and Pou5f1. Human ESCs and mouse epiblast stem cells (EpiSCs) represent immature and mature epiblast cells, respectively, where Otx2 and Zic2 progressively take over the preimplantation stage's regulatory roles of Sox2 and Pou5f1. This transition of the core TFs occurs to prepare for the initiation of somatic development.

Studies using early-stage avian embryos have substantially impacted developmental biology, through the availability of simple culture methods and easiness in tissue manipulation. However, the regulations underlying brain and head development, a central issue of developmental biology, have not been investigated systematically. Yoshihi et al. (2022a) devised a technique to randomly label the epiblast cells with a green fluorescent protein before their development into the brain tissue. This technique was combined with grafting a node or node-derived anterior mesendoderm labeled with a cherry-colored fluorescent protein. Then cellular events were live-recorded over 18 hours during the brain and head development. The live imaging-based analyses identified previously undescribed mechanisms central to brain development: all anterior epiblast cells have a potential to develop into the brain tissues and their gathering onto a proximal anterior mesendoderm forms a brain primordium whereas the remaining cells develop into the covering head ectoderm. The analyses also ruled out the direct participation of the node's activity in the brain development. Yoshihi et al. (2022a) also demonstrate how the enigmatic data from classical models can be reinterpreted in the new model.This chapter was adapted from Yoshihi K, Iida H, Teramoto M, Ishii Y, Kato K, Kondoh H. (2022b). Epiblast cells gather onto the anterior mesendoderm and initiate brain development without the direct involvement of the node in avian embryos: Insights from broad-field live imaging. Front Cell Dev Biol. 10:1019845. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1019845.