{"title":"Spuren der Vergangenheit und der Gegenwart: wie sich historische und soziologische Forschungen gegenseitig unterstützen können","authors":"Magdalena Lemańczyk","doi":"10.35757/RPN.2020.28.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35757/RPN.2020.28.04","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":393980,"journal":{"name":"Rocznik Polsko-Niemiecki","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123634259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In my study, I summarise the content issues, methodological approaches and the most important results of the historical literature dealing with the history of the German minority in Hungary during the decade after the Second World War. It can be said that the historical research on the expulsion of Germans from Hungary up to 1990, the change of regime, was characterised by a positivist, descriptive, event-centric approach. The questions of this research were basically organised by the outcome of Potsdam and how this related to Hungary. In connection with both the content and methodological issues, I will touch on – in my opinion – the missing aspects, the possibility of more complex research approaches.
{"title":"Research Questions and Methodological Approaches in the Literature on the History of the German Minority in Hungary between 1945 and 1955","authors":"Á. Tóth","doi":"10.35757/RPN.2020.28.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35757/RPN.2020.28.13","url":null,"abstract":"In my study, I summarise the content issues, methodological approaches and the most important results of the historical literature dealing with the history of the German minority in Hungary during the decade after the Second World War. It can be said that the historical research on the expulsion of Germans from Hungary up to 1990, the change of regime, was characterised by a positivist, descriptive, event-centric approach. The questions of this research were basically organised by the outcome of Potsdam and how this related to Hungary. In connection with both the content and methodological issues, I will touch on – in my opinion – the missing aspects, the possibility of more complex research approaches.","PeriodicalId":393980,"journal":{"name":"Rocznik Polsko-Niemiecki","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123381280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Autor analizuje zasadność posługiwania się terminem "masakra", jak czyni to Daniel Brewing w swoim studium, w kontekście zbrodni niemieckich na polskiej ludności cywilnej w czasie II wojny światowej.
{"title":"Masakry czy ludobójstwo?","authors":"Tomasz Ceran","doi":"10.35757/RPN.2020.28.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35757/RPN.2020.28.01","url":null,"abstract":"Autor analizuje zasadność posługiwania się terminem \"masakra\", jak czyni to Daniel Brewing w swoim studium, w kontekście zbrodni niemieckich na polskiej ludności cywilnej w czasie II wojny światowej.","PeriodicalId":393980,"journal":{"name":"Rocznik Polsko-Niemiecki","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126304392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
W czasie przełomu społeczno-politycznego (jesień 1989–wiosna 1990) instytucje z NRD i RFN prowadziły badania opinii publicznej, które miały służyć poznaniu zdania społeczeństwa wschodnioniemieckiego na aktualne, nierzadko polaryzujące tematy. Wśród wiodących tematów były między innymi stosunek obywateli NRD do zjednoczenia Niemiec, a także problem wzmożonych wyjazdów do RFN. Oczywiście badania nie ograniczały się tylko do tych dwóch zagadnień, ale zawierały cały szereg innych pytań, które pozwalały zbadać poglądy i aktywność polityczną społeczeństwa NRD z przełomu 1989 i 1990. Podstawą opracowania są materiały archiwalne wytworzone przez BND i zdeponowane w Bundesarchiv (Archiwum Federalnym w Koblencji), a także materiały ze zbiorów GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften udostępnione on-line. Uzupełnienie stanowi literatura niemieckojęzyczna.
{"title":"Obywatele Niemiec Wschodnich wobec zjednoczenia niemiecko-niemieckiego i przesiedleń do RFN w świetle tajnych badań opinii publicznej (jesień 1989– wiosna 1990)","authors":"Małgorzata Świder","doi":"10.35757/RPN.2020.28.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35757/RPN.2020.28.10","url":null,"abstract":"W czasie przełomu społeczno-politycznego (jesień 1989–wiosna 1990) instytucje z NRD i RFN prowadziły badania opinii publicznej, które miały służyć poznaniu zdania społeczeństwa wschodnioniemieckiego na aktualne, nierzadko polaryzujące tematy. Wśród wiodących tematów były między innymi stosunek obywateli NRD do zjednoczenia Niemiec, a także problem wzmożonych wyjazdów do RFN. Oczywiście badania nie ograniczały się tylko do tych dwóch zagadnień, ale zawierały cały szereg innych pytań, które pozwalały zbadać poglądy i aktywność polityczną społeczeństwa NRD z przełomu 1989 i 1990. Podstawą opracowania są materiały archiwalne wytworzone przez BND i zdeponowane w Bundesarchiv (Archiwum Federalnym w Koblencji), a także materiały ze zbiorów GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften udostępnione on-line. Uzupełnienie stanowi literatura niemieckojęzyczna.","PeriodicalId":393980,"journal":{"name":"Rocznik Polsko-Niemiecki","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125254206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Dyplomacja RFN i miasto Szczecin w okresie polskich przełomów w latach 1970–1989","authors":"Paweł Popieliński","doi":"10.35757/RPN.2020.28.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35757/RPN.2020.28.07","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":393980,"journal":{"name":"Rocznik Polsko-Niemiecki","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131555675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article aims to characterise the positive and negative aspects of being a national minority, using the example of the German minority in the Opolskie Voivodeship and the category of social welfare in the sociological sense. In order to conceptualise and operationalise the idea of national identity, attention has been focused mainly on its cultural determinants, with particular emphasis on the role of language and organisational activity. The empirical exploration of the research questions was based on surveys, carried out by the authors of the article on behalf of the Social-Cultural Society of Germans in Opole Silesia (SCSG) in the summer of 2019, among members of the German minority organisation. [1] The research was carried out in the period from June to August 2019 as part of the SCSG's campaign entitled “The German minority has a value”, financed by the Polish Ministry of Interior and Administration.
{"title":"National Identity and Social Welfare: the Example of the German Minority in Opolskie Voivodeship","authors":"M. Lemańczyk, M. Baranowski","doi":"10.35757/RPN.2020.28.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35757/RPN.2020.28.03","url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to characterise the positive and negative aspects of being a national minority, using the example of the German minority in the Opolskie Voivodeship and the category of social welfare in the sociological sense. In order to conceptualise and operationalise the idea of national identity, attention has been focused mainly on its cultural determinants, with particular emphasis on the role of language and organisational activity. The empirical exploration of the research questions was based on surveys, carried out by the authors of the article on behalf of the Social-Cultural Society of Germans in Opole Silesia (SCSG) in the summer of 2019, among members of the German minority organisation. \u0000 \u0000[1] The research was carried out in the period from June to August 2019 as part of the SCSG's campaign entitled “The German minority has a value”, financed by the Polish Ministry of Interior and Administration.","PeriodicalId":393980,"journal":{"name":"Rocznik Polsko-Niemiecki","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122765188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The article focuses on the first steps in the political career of female politicians from the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and the Christian Social Union (CSU), who assumed top political positions at the federal level in Germany between 1991 and 2018. The author analyses when the female leaders of the CDU and CSU took their first parliamentary seats in the German Bundestag, when they obtained the first leading positions at the federal level, and also how many years after joining the party this took place. It is also interesting whether top female politicians took their first parliamentary seats through votes in direct districts or thanks to the party list (second votes). Do the career paths of the female politicians from the Christian Democrats fit the model of typical career paths, or do they also include those who have avoided key positions on their way to the top?
{"title":"Początki politycznej kariery czołowych polityczek CDU i CSU na poziomie federalnym w Niemczech w latach 1991–2018","authors":"M. Piotrowska","doi":"10.35757/RPN.2020.28.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35757/RPN.2020.28.06","url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on the first steps in the political career of female politicians from the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and the Christian Social Union (CSU), who assumed top political positions at the federal level in Germany between 1991 and 2018. The author analyses when the female leaders of the CDU and CSU took their first parliamentary seats in the German Bundestag, when they obtained the first leading positions at the federal level, and also how many years after joining the party this took place. It is also interesting whether top female politicians took their first parliamentary seats through votes in direct districts or thanks to the party list (second votes). Do the career paths of the female politicians from the Christian Democrats fit the model of typical career paths, or do they also include those who have avoided key positions on their way to the top?","PeriodicalId":393980,"journal":{"name":"Rocznik Polsko-Niemiecki","volume":"158 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122799668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The authors of this article focus on showing the genesis of the situation and the attitude towards Sinti and Roma in the Third Reich and post-war Germany. They deal with the issue of commemorating the persecution and genocide of this community in post-war and reunified Germany. The article also indicates a selection of some of the most important memorial sites in Germany dedicated to Sinti and Roma. The genocide of Sinti and Roma represents an important turning point in their history. In line with the racist policy of the Third Reich, they were outlawed and sentenced to extermination. The subject of the Sinti and Roma extermination was long absent in the public discourse of post-war Germany and in the consciousness of society. While the Federal Republic of Germany recognised the Jewish victims fairly quickly, the Sinti and Roma genocide was ignored. The official version of the narrative stated that Sinti and Roma were persecuted in Nazi Germany not because of racist policies but because of social maladjustment (Asoziale). It was only in the 1980s that places devoted to the persecution and extermination of Sinti and Roma began to be commemorated.The present memory of the victims and the recognition of the rights of Sinti and Roma in Germany are the result of their ethnic mobilisation and long and hard-won campaigns for equal participation in society. Today, the commemoration of the wrongs suffered by Sinti and Roma during the Nazi regime is an important step for German society in dealing with its past.
{"title":"Upamiętnianie zagłady Sinti i Romów przed i po zjednoczeniu Niemiec – wstęp do problematyki","authors":"Paweł Popieliński, P. Krzyżanowski","doi":"10.35757/RPN.2020.28.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35757/RPN.2020.28.08","url":null,"abstract":"The authors of this article focus on showing the genesis of the situation and the attitude towards Sinti and Roma in the Third Reich and post-war Germany. They deal with the issue of commemorating the persecution and genocide of this community in post-war and reunified Germany. The article also indicates a selection of some of the most important memorial sites in Germany dedicated to Sinti and Roma. The genocide of Sinti and Roma represents an important turning point in their history. In line with the racist policy of the Third Reich, they were outlawed and sentenced to extermination. The subject of the Sinti and Roma extermination was long absent in the public discourse of post-war Germany and in the consciousness of society. While the Federal Republic of Germany recognised the Jewish victims fairly quickly, the Sinti and Roma genocide was ignored. The official version of the narrative stated that Sinti and Roma were persecuted in Nazi Germany not because of racist policies but because of social maladjustment (Asoziale). It was only in the 1980s that places devoted to the persecution and extermination of Sinti and Roma began to be commemorated.The present memory of the victims and the recognition of the rights of Sinti and Roma in Germany are the result of their ethnic mobilisation and long and hard-won campaigns for equal participation in society. Today, the commemoration of the wrongs suffered by Sinti and Roma during the Nazi regime is an important step for German society in dealing with its past.","PeriodicalId":393980,"journal":{"name":"Rocznik Polsko-Niemiecki","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121819701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Historical commissions and dialogues of historians have been created in order to foster rapprochement, if not reconciliation. The principle is to create a dialogue about history, and, in a spirit of “reconstructive ethics,” (Ferry) to listen to the other’s viewpoints and therefore to put these visions into perspective. That is exactly what the Polish-German Textbook Commission, created in 1972, has been trying to do after WWII, while the 1970’s constituted a period of growth for such bilateral commissions. The task for the Textbook commission was especially complicated, while the two countries still belonged to two different blocs during the Cold War. It however reached its peak in the 1970’s-1980’s, when the commission was one of the only Polish-German, East-West platform for dialogue. Despite the 1989 revolution, the commission still exists today. But how have the 1989 events affected the commission’s work? Have they been a turning- point toward a completely new reality? My hypothesis is twofold: 1989 implicated few little changes on the short-run, but brought some deeper ones on the long-run. The structure of this article will follow this reasoning. First, I will present the limited changes on the short-run. Second, I will explain the bigger changes that could emerge after 1989. This article is based on data collected for my PhD, especially interviews, archives, participant observations, discourses, the media.
{"title":"1989: A (Non-)Turning Point for the Polish-German Schoolbook Commission?","authors":"Emma Hebert","doi":"10.35757/RPN.2020.28.16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35757/RPN.2020.28.16","url":null,"abstract":"Historical commissions and dialogues of historians have been created in order to foster rapprochement, if not reconciliation. The principle is to create a dialogue about history, and, in a spirit of “reconstructive ethics,” (Ferry) to listen to the other’s viewpoints and therefore to put these visions into perspective. That is exactly what the Polish-German Textbook Commission, created in 1972, has been trying to do after WWII, while the 1970’s constituted a period of growth for such bilateral commissions. The task for the Textbook commission was especially complicated, while the two countries still belonged to two different blocs during the Cold War. It however reached its peak in the 1970’s-1980’s, when the commission was one of the only Polish-German, East-West platform for dialogue. Despite the 1989 revolution, the commission still exists today. But how have the 1989 events affected the commission’s work? Have they been a turning- point toward a completely new reality? My hypothesis is twofold: 1989 implicated few little changes on the short-run, but brought some deeper ones on the long-run. The structure of this article will follow this reasoning. First, I will present the limited changes on the short-run. Second, I will explain the bigger changes that could emerge after 1989. This article is based on data collected for my PhD, especially interviews, archives, participant observations, discourses, the media.","PeriodicalId":393980,"journal":{"name":"Rocznik Polsko-Niemiecki","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125142562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article introduces the concept of transculturation of collective memory and the politics of memory in the Polish-German borderland. The role of the 1990 German reunification in that process is studied using the example of the Lubusz region. Reunification made it possible for cooperation between local governments, associations and individuals, which – consequently – led to the creation of a new, trans-border collective memory.
{"title":"Zjednoczenie Niemiec a transkulturacja polityki historycznej i pamięci zbiorowej mieszkańców pogranicza polsko-niemieckiego na przykładzie Ziemi Lubuskiej","authors":"Krzysztof Wasilewski","doi":"10.35757/RPN.2020.28.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35757/RPN.2020.28.12","url":null,"abstract":"This article introduces the concept of transculturation of collective memory and the politics of memory in the Polish-German borderland. The role of the 1990 German reunification in that process is studied using the example of the Lubusz region. Reunification made it possible for cooperation between local governments, associations and individuals, which – consequently – led to the creation of a new, trans-border collective memory.","PeriodicalId":393980,"journal":{"name":"Rocznik Polsko-Niemiecki","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130835202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：