This syllabus is intended to act as a guide for students and their instructors in medical schools. It describes the range of clinical presentations that they should be able to recognize and the underlying conditions that they should know how to treat. It also includes knowledge of the practice of Acute Internal Medicine and systems of care. The appropriate level of knowledge is that which would be expected of a non-specialist Foundation level doctor.
{"title":"Society for Acute Medicine undergraduate syllabus for Acute Internal Medicine.","authors":"M Trimble, N Murch, V Price, K Slinger","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This syllabus is intended to act as a guide for students and their instructors in medical schools. It describes the range of clinical presentations that they should be able to recognize and the underlying conditions that they should know how to treat. It also includes knowledge of the practice of Acute Internal Medicine and systems of care. The appropriate level of knowledge is that which would be expected of a non-specialist Foundation level doctor.</p>","PeriodicalId":39743,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139571621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kirellos Said Abbas, Adnan Qureshi, Soban Ahmad, Gregory Y H Lip, Chun Shing Kwok
Background: The incidence of hospital admissions for pulmonary embolism (PE) and associated pleural effusion, and the impact of these effusions on outcomes on a national level is unknown.
Methods: Data from the National Inpatient Sample between 2016 to 2019 was used to conduct a retrospective nationwide cohort study of hospital admissions for PE with and without pleural effusion. Multiple logistic regressions and linear regression analyses were used to determine the independent impact of effusions on in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost.
Results: There were 937,744 hospital admissions with PE included in our analysis (median age 64 [interquartile range 50-76] years; 52.5% females). The in-hospital mortality rate overall was 3.7% which was 5.5% for patients with pleural effusion and 3.6% for patients without pleural effusion (p<0.001). The median length of stay was longer in the group with pleural effusion (6 [3-12] days vs 4 [2-6] days, p<0.001) and the median healthcare cost was higher among patients with pleural effusion (13,689 [7,279-30,915] vs 8,855 [5,472-16,531], p<0.001). The factors most associated with pleural effusion were atrial fibrillation (OR 1.89 95%CI 1.78-2.00, p<0.001) and arterial thrombosis (OR 1.48 95%CI 1.19-1.84, p<0.001). Pleural effusion was associated with increased odds of mortality in patients with PE (OR 1.30 95%CI 1.18-1.45, p<0.001). Pleural effusion was associated with increased length of stay (Coefficient 4.15 95%CI 3.99 to 4.32, p<0.001), and healthcare costs (Coefficient 12,164; 95%CI:11,639 to 12,688, p<0.001)).
Conclusion: Concomitant pleural effusion is not uncommon among PE patients which is more common in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous arterial thrombosis. Pleural effusions in patients with PE are associated with higher in-hospital mortality, length of stay and cost.
{"title":"Impact of Pleural Effusion on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample.","authors":"Kirellos Said Abbas, Adnan Qureshi, Soban Ahmad, Gregory Y H Lip, Chun Shing Kwok","doi":"10.52964/AMJA.0930","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52964/AMJA.0930","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of hospital admissions for pulmonary embolism (PE) and associated pleural effusion, and the impact of these effusions on outcomes on a national level is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the National Inpatient Sample between 2016 to 2019 was used to conduct a retrospective nationwide cohort study of hospital admissions for PE with and without pleural effusion. Multiple logistic regressions and linear regression analyses were used to determine the independent impact of effusions on in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 937,744 hospital admissions with PE included in our analysis (median age 64 [interquartile range 50-76] years; 52.5% females). The in-hospital mortality rate overall was 3.7% which was 5.5% for patients with pleural effusion and 3.6% for patients without pleural effusion (p<0.001). The median length of stay was longer in the group with pleural effusion (6 [3-12] days vs 4 [2-6] days, p<0.001) and the median healthcare cost was higher among patients with pleural effusion (13,689 [7,279-30,915] vs 8,855 [5,472-16,531], p<0.001). The factors most associated with pleural effusion were atrial fibrillation (OR 1.89 95%CI 1.78-2.00, p<0.001) and arterial thrombosis (OR 1.48 95%CI 1.19-1.84, p<0.001). Pleural effusion was associated with increased odds of mortality in patients with PE (OR 1.30 95%CI 1.18-1.45, p<0.001). Pleural effusion was associated with increased length of stay (Coefficient 4.15 95%CI 3.99 to 4.32, p<0.001), and healthcare costs (Coefficient 12,164; 95%CI:11,639 to 12,688, p<0.001)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Concomitant pleural effusion is not uncommon among PE patients which is more common in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous arterial thrombosis. Pleural effusions in patients with PE are associated with higher in-hospital mortality, length of stay and cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":39743,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9289138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Acute Physicians care for acutely unwell patients. Recognising and prioritising those at greatest risk of death is therefore at the heart of our specialty. The risk of catastrophic deterioration in the Acute Medical Unit is usually quantified through the measurement of vital signs. These are being summarised into the National Early Warning Score or similar instruments. Those with higher Early Warning Scores are usually prioritised by clinicians in and out of hospital and being seen before those with lower grades of abnormalities and preferably assessed by a more senior clinician.
{"title":"Guest Editorial - Bad NEWS: standing still is risky for patients admitted to hospital (even with normal vital signs).","authors":"C P Subbe","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute Physicians care for acutely unwell patients. Recognising and prioritising those at greatest risk of death is therefore at the heart of our specialty. The risk of catastrophic deterioration in the Acute Medical Unit is usually quantified through the measurement of vital signs. These are being summarised into the National Early Warning Score or similar instruments. Those with higher Early Warning Scores are usually prioritised by clinicians in and out of hospital and being seen before those with lower grades of abnormalities and preferably assessed by a more senior clinician.</p>","PeriodicalId":39743,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41112933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient reported experience measures (PREMS) are a key part of measured quality. There is no tool currently used in the UK in Acute Medicine. On the 8th of September 2022 10 units based in England, Scotland and Wales collected data for the validated PREM, alongside the EQ-5D and variables from the Society for Acute Medicine's Benchmarking Audit (SAMBA) dataset. 365 patients were screened, 200 were included (55%): 159 patients from AMUs and 41 from SDEC units. Overall experience of patients was rated 8.5/10, patients rated their experience of safety, trust and listening highly. Collection of PREMS was feasible. Further research is required to link experience to clinical outcome and explore tools that capture experience of patients with altered mental status.
{"title":"Society for Acute Medicine's Patients: Learning from Experience Report (SAM-PLER) A service evaluation of patient reported experience in Acute Medicine - establishing the feasibility of a quality improvement collaborative.","authors":"C P Subbe, C Atkin, A Gebril, L R Rahman, R Varia","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient reported experience measures (PREMS) are a key part of measured quality. There is no tool currently used in the UK in Acute Medicine. On the 8th of September 2022 10 units based in England, Scotland and Wales collected data for the validated PREM, alongside the EQ-5D and variables from the Society for Acute Medicine's Benchmarking Audit (SAMBA) dataset. 365 patients were screened, 200 were included (55%): 159 patients from AMUs and 41 from SDEC units. Overall experience of patients was rated 8.5/10, patients rated their experience of safety, trust and listening highly. Collection of PREMS was feasible. Further research is required to link experience to clinical outcome and explore tools that capture experience of patients with altered mental status.</p>","PeriodicalId":39743,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41169593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Critical Care Units provide care to those patients who traditionally need "organ support". There is variation in provision and "admission criteria" across the UK, and although Level 2 admissions have been increasing this often reflects increasing perioperative demand and largely ignores the unmet and often unmeasured medical need.
{"title":"Guest Editorial - Enhanced Care: Developing the resource within Acute Medicine.","authors":"Paul Dean, Nicholas Smallwood","doi":"10.52964/AMJA.0927","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52964/AMJA.0927","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Critical Care Units provide care to those patients who traditionally need \"organ support\". There is variation in provision and \"admission criteria\" across the UK, and although Level 2 admissions have been increasing this often reflects increasing perioperative demand and largely ignores the unmet and often unmeasured medical need.</p>","PeriodicalId":39743,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9289136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common and potentially life-threatening condition encountered routinely in acute care. The diagnosis and management of PE has been the topic of National Institute of Health Care Excellence and European Cardiology Society guidelines. The recommendations within these guidelines have allowed standardisation of care and have facilitated the delivery of protocolised care pathways. Whilst some elements of care are determined by consensus view, there have been large randomised controlled trials and well-designed observational studies which have helped us understand the role of risk factors for PE, short term risk-stratification after initial diagnosis and treatment options in hospital as well as in the months after discharge from Acute Medicine. Few other conditions in acute care are informed by the same levels of evidence, yet there are many unresolved questions.
{"title":"Guest Editorial - Pulmonary Embolism: the risk of what we don't yet know!","authors":"T Knight, D Lasserson","doi":"10.52964/AMJA.0935","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52964/AMJA.0935","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common and potentially life-threatening condition encountered routinely in acute care. The diagnosis and management of PE has been the topic of National Institute of Health Care Excellence and European Cardiology Society guidelines. The recommendations within these guidelines have allowed standardisation of care and have facilitated the delivery of protocolised care pathways. Whilst some elements of care are determined by consensus view, there have been large randomised controlled trials and well-designed observational studies which have helped us understand the role of risk factors for PE, short term risk-stratification after initial diagnosis and treatment options in hospital as well as in the months after discharge from Acute Medicine. Few other conditions in acute care are informed by the same levels of evidence, yet there are many unresolved questions.</p>","PeriodicalId":39743,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9621786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
There are a wide number of indications for extracorporeal therapies in the critical care environment. A common indication seen by the acute physician is continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in a proportion of patients with acute kidney injury. It is therefore important that acute physicians have a sound understanding of the principles of CRRT in the acutely unwell patient. This review will outline the indications for its use, commonly used methods and anticoagulation considerations. It will discuss when to start and stop CRRT as well as describing potential treatment complications. This review will also discuss the role of therapeutic plasma exchange in critical care and novel extracorporeal therapies including blood purification in sepsis and carbon dioxide removal in acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute exacerbations of obstructive lung disease. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is outside of the scope of this article.
{"title":"Renal replacement and extracorporeal therapies in critical care: current and future directions.","authors":"S F Lane, E Harvey-Jones, O Ward, R Davies","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are a wide number of indications for extracorporeal therapies in the critical care environment. A common indication seen by the acute physician is continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in a proportion of patients with acute kidney injury. It is therefore important that acute physicians have a sound understanding of the principles of CRRT in the acutely unwell patient. This review will outline the indications for its use, commonly used methods and anticoagulation considerations. It will discuss when to start and stop CRRT as well as describing potential treatment complications. This review will also discuss the role of therapeutic plasma exchange in critical care and novel extracorporeal therapies including blood purification in sepsis and carbon dioxide removal in acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute exacerbations of obstructive lung disease. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is outside of the scope of this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":39743,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41151853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
P Burger, E S Van den Ende, W Lukman, G L Burchell, Lmh Steur, Jaw Polderman, H Merten, Jwr Twisk, Pwb Nanayakkara, Rjbj Gemke
Objective: To determine factors affecting inpatient sleep and assess the range and effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions aimed at improving the sleep of patients admitted to regular care wards.
Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in five scientific databases, including articles published from inception to June 23rd, 2023. Eligible studies evaluated sleep disturbing factors or the effect of non-pharmacological intervention(s). Meta-analyses on intervention studies were conducted using a random effects model. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.
Results: Out of 591 potentially eligible studies, 229 were included in this review. Sleep disturbers were identified in 153 studies, and 102 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. Common factors contributing to poor sleep included noise, light, care-related interruptions, pain, and anxiety. The meta-analyses revealed large pooled effects in favor of sleep for the use of eye masks and earplugs, headphones and white noise, aromatherapy, massage, muscle relaxation and breathing exercises, and advanced nursing strategies. However, the certainty of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low.
Conclusion: Inpatient sleep is often disturbed by patient-related, care-related, and environmental factors. While there are promising non-pharmacological interventions, the overall quality of studies, heterogeneity in study populations, and differences in outcome measures present challenges for drawing definitive conclusions.
{"title":"How to improve inpatient sleep in regular care wards: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sleep disturbers and non-pharmacological interventions.","authors":"P Burger, E S Van den Ende, W Lukman, G L Burchell, Lmh Steur, Jaw Polderman, H Merten, Jwr Twisk, Pwb Nanayakkara, Rjbj Gemke","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine factors affecting inpatient sleep and assess the range and effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions aimed at improving the sleep of patients admitted to regular care wards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in five scientific databases, including articles published from inception to June 23rd, 2023. Eligible studies evaluated sleep disturbing factors or the effect of non-pharmacological intervention(s). Meta-analyses on intervention studies were conducted using a random effects model. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 591 potentially eligible studies, 229 were included in this review. Sleep disturbers were identified in 153 studies, and 102 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. Common factors contributing to poor sleep included noise, light, care-related interruptions, pain, and anxiety. The meta-analyses revealed large pooled effects in favor of sleep for the use of eye masks and earplugs, headphones and white noise, aromatherapy, massage, muscle relaxation and breathing exercises, and advanced nursing strategies. However, the certainty of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inpatient sleep is often disturbed by patient-related, care-related, and environmental factors. While there are promising non-pharmacological interventions, the overall quality of studies, heterogeneity in study populations, and differences in outcome measures present challenges for drawing definitive conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":39743,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139571614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Readmission after hospital discharge is an ongoing challenge that healthcare systems face worldwide, with multimorbidity increasing the readmission risk significantly. Identifying higher risk groups of patients allows for safety netting at discharge to be implemented to prevent harm. The aim of this study was to compare readmission rates and reasons across common diagnostic groups presenting to the acute medical unit.
Method: A retrospective analysis was performed on an anonymous dataset extracted from Salford Royal Hospital from 2014 - 2022 covering all non-elective inpatient admissions to AMU or medical same day emergency care where the patient survived to discharge. Episodes were grouped according to ICD-10 diagnostic codes, with readmission rates and reasons at 30 and 90 day calculated and compared using descriptive statistics. Further subgroups were evaluated according to demographic and co-morbid features.
Results: There were 89,897 admissions to AMU and SDEC where patients survived to discharge: age 68±19 years, 53% female. 5,880 episodes were excluded due to inpatient death. The most common first admission reasons were pneumonia (n=9,121), COPD (4,800) and sepsis (3,440). The overall 30 day readmission rate was 12.3%, with the highest rates being found where first admission episode was due to liver disease (21.9%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, 21.1%), and falls (17.9%). 6% of all patients were readmitted within 30 days due to recurrence of the primary presenting illness, representing 49% of all readmissions. After primary illness recurrence, pneumonia was the second most common readmission reason in 17 of 22 diagnostic groups and accounted for 25% of all readmissions excluding primary illness recurrence. Overall 90 day readmission rate was 24.2% with the same 3 most common diagnostic groups (liver disease 44%, COPD 39% and falls 34%). For 90 day readmission reasons according to specified comorbidities, the highest rates were seen in heart failures (34.1%) and COPD (33.1%). The highest readmission reason in the diagnostic groups was 41.4% of heart failure patients being readmitted with respiratory causes. Heart failure was the most impactful co-morbid factor associated with higher likelihood of 90 day readmission in other disease presentations (34.4% with heart failure, 22.8% without).
Discussion: Readmission rates vary significantly between diagnostic and co-morbid groups meaning that targeting high risk groups for safety netting may be possible using only simple admission details.
{"title":"Rates and Reasons for Readmission after Hospitalisation on the Acute Medical Unit.","authors":"E Belvoir, M Holland, D Green","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Readmission after hospital discharge is an ongoing challenge that healthcare systems face worldwide, with multimorbidity increasing the readmission risk significantly. Identifying higher risk groups of patients allows for safety netting at discharge to be implemented to prevent harm. The aim of this study was to compare readmission rates and reasons across common diagnostic groups presenting to the acute medical unit.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on an anonymous dataset extracted from Salford Royal Hospital from 2014 - 2022 covering all non-elective inpatient admissions to AMU or medical same day emergency care where the patient survived to discharge. Episodes were grouped according to ICD-10 diagnostic codes, with readmission rates and reasons at 30 and 90 day calculated and compared using descriptive statistics. Further subgroups were evaluated according to demographic and co-morbid features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 89,897 admissions to AMU and SDEC where patients survived to discharge: age 68±19 years, 53% female. 5,880 episodes were excluded due to inpatient death. The most common first admission reasons were pneumonia (n=9,121), COPD (4,800) and sepsis (3,440). The overall 30 day readmission rate was 12.3%, with the highest rates being found where first admission episode was due to liver disease (21.9%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, 21.1%), and falls (17.9%). 6% of all patients were readmitted within 30 days due to recurrence of the primary presenting illness, representing 49% of all readmissions. After primary illness recurrence, pneumonia was the second most common readmission reason in 17 of 22 diagnostic groups and accounted for 25% of all readmissions excluding primary illness recurrence. Overall 90 day readmission rate was 24.2% with the same 3 most common diagnostic groups (liver disease 44%, COPD 39% and falls 34%). For 90 day readmission reasons according to specified comorbidities, the highest rates were seen in heart failures (34.1%) and COPD (33.1%). The highest readmission reason in the diagnostic groups was 41.4% of heart failure patients being readmitted with respiratory causes. Heart failure was the most impactful co-morbid factor associated with higher likelihood of 90 day readmission in other disease presentations (34.4% with heart failure, 22.8% without).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Readmission rates vary significantly between diagnostic and co-morbid groups meaning that targeting high risk groups for safety netting may be possible using only simple admission details.</p>","PeriodicalId":39743,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139571620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
B Schouten, H Merten, Mnt Kremers, M van Greuningen, C Wagner, Pwb Nanayakkara
Objective: Emergency department (ED) crowding is a worldwide problem and one of the main causes internationally is an increase in presentations by older patients with complex and chronic care needs. Although there has been a 4,3% reduction in total ED visits from 2016-2019 in the Netherlands, the EDs still experience crowding. National crowding research has not focused on the older group in detail, hence their possible role remains ill defined. The primary aim of this study was to map the trend in ED visits by older patients in the Netherlands. The secondary aim was to identify healthcare utilization 30 days before/after ED visit.
Methods: We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study, using longitudinal health insurance claims data (2016-2019). The data encompasses all Dutch patients of 70 years or older who visited the ED.
Results: The number of older patients who visited the ED followed by admission, increased from 231,223 patients (2016), to 234,817 (2019). The number without admission also increased from 244,814 patients, to 274,984. There were 696,005 total visits by older patients (2016) increasing to 730,358 visits (2019).
Conclusion: The slight rise in older patients at the ED is consistent with overall population growth of older people in the Netherlands. These results indicate that Dutch ED crowding cannot be explained by mere numbers of older patients. More research is needed with data on patient level, to study other contributing factors, such as complexity of care needs within the ageing population.
{"title":"Emergency department crowding and older patients: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.","authors":"B Schouten, H Merten, Mnt Kremers, M van Greuningen, C Wagner, Pwb Nanayakkara","doi":"10.52964/AMJA.0938","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52964/AMJA.0938","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Emergency department (ED) crowding is a worldwide problem and one of the main causes internationally is an increase in presentations by older patients with complex and chronic care needs. Although there has been a 4,3% reduction in total ED visits from 2016-2019 in the Netherlands, the EDs still experience crowding. National crowding research has not focused on the older group in detail, hence their possible role remains ill defined. The primary aim of this study was to map the trend in ED visits by older patients in the Netherlands. The secondary aim was to identify healthcare utilization 30 days before/after ED visit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study, using longitudinal health insurance claims data (2016-2019). The data encompasses all Dutch patients of 70 years or older who visited the ED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of older patients who visited the ED followed by admission, increased from 231,223 patients (2016), to 234,817 (2019). The number without admission also increased from 244,814 patients, to 274,984. There were 696,005 total visits by older patients (2016) increasing to 730,358 visits (2019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The slight rise in older patients at the ED is consistent with overall population growth of older people in the Netherlands. These results indicate that Dutch ED crowding cannot be explained by mere numbers of older patients. More research is needed with data on patient level, to study other contributing factors, such as complexity of care needs within the ageing population.</p>","PeriodicalId":39743,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9621784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}