Pub Date : 2023-10-11DOI: 10.1177/07340168231206807
Aislinn Wallace
{"title":"Book Review: <i>Whiteout: How Racial Capitalism Changed the Color of Opioids in America</i> by Hansen, H., Netherland, J., & Herzberg, D","authors":"Aislinn Wallace","doi":"10.1177/07340168231206807","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07340168231206807","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":40065,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Review","volume":"254 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136212150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-03DOI: 10.1177/07340168231206123
Iwa Maulana
{"title":"Book Review: <i>Understanding Crime and Place: A Methods Handbook</i> by Elizabeth R. Groff & Cory P. Haberman","authors":"Iwa Maulana","doi":"10.1177/07340168231206123","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07340168231206123","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":40065,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Review","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135696081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-26DOI: 10.1177/07340168231204039
Craig Hemmens, Ciara McGlynn, Mary J. McMillin
In this paper, we review and analyze the criminal justice–related decisions of the 2022 term of the United States Supreme Court. We also provide a summary of the Court's voting patterns and opinion authorship. Fourteen of the Court's 58 decisions touched on criminal justice. There were significant decisions involving the First Amendment, the Sixth Amendment, and federal criminal statutes. Each of these is discussed in turn.
{"title":"Recent Legal Developments: Criminal Justice Decisions of the United States Supreme Court, 2022 Term","authors":"Craig Hemmens, Ciara McGlynn, Mary J. McMillin","doi":"10.1177/07340168231204039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07340168231204039","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we review and analyze the criminal justice–related decisions of the 2022 term of the United States Supreme Court. We also provide a summary of the Court's voting patterns and opinion authorship. Fourteen of the Court's 58 decisions touched on criminal justice. There were significant decisions involving the First Amendment, the Sixth Amendment, and federal criminal statutes. Each of these is discussed in turn.","PeriodicalId":40065,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Review","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134960295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-18DOI: 10.1177/07340168231201798
Jeffrey J. Roth
Short-term rentals (also referred to as “home sharing” or “vacation home rentals”) are a form of temporary housing in which units are leased to travelers for a limited time. Theories such as social disorganization and routine activities suggest possible connections between short-term rental presence and crime or disorder, and existing studies have confirmed that relationship under certain circumstances. However, there are unexplored questions about whether the findings hold true in places with novel demographic, cultural, or touristic features. The present study contributes to this literature by considering the relationship between short-term rentals and disorder across census block groups in a cannabis tourism destination (Denver, Colorado), while controlling for hotel presence, sporting venues, cannabis dispensaries, liquor establishments, and other socio-demographic features. The effects of short-term rental density varied by listing type (entire unit or private room) and were diminished by the inclusion of usage (guest reviews) in the models. Also considered are Denver regulations that may contribute to the limited effects of short-term rentals observed here, as are directions for new research.
{"title":"Short-term Rentals and Disorder in a Cannabis Tourism Destination","authors":"Jeffrey J. Roth","doi":"10.1177/07340168231201798","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07340168231201798","url":null,"abstract":"Short-term rentals (also referred to as “home sharing” or “vacation home rentals”) are a form of temporary housing in which units are leased to travelers for a limited time. Theories such as social disorganization and routine activities suggest possible connections between short-term rental presence and crime or disorder, and existing studies have confirmed that relationship under certain circumstances. However, there are unexplored questions about whether the findings hold true in places with novel demographic, cultural, or touristic features. The present study contributes to this literature by considering the relationship between short-term rentals and disorder across census block groups in a cannabis tourism destination (Denver, Colorado), while controlling for hotel presence, sporting venues, cannabis dispensaries, liquor establishments, and other socio-demographic features. The effects of short-term rental density varied by listing type (entire unit or private room) and were diminished by the inclusion of usage (guest reviews) in the models. Also considered are Denver regulations that may contribute to the limited effects of short-term rentals observed here, as are directions for new research.","PeriodicalId":40065,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135202911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-12DOI: 10.1177/07340168231198127
Joselyne L. Chenane, Amber Horning, Sean Perry, Catherine Stevens
Using cross-national data collected during the pandemic, this study examines factors influencing public willingness to obey and cooperate with police during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data for the study were garnered using web-based surveys, which yielded about 500 participants from the U.S., India, Brazil, Kenya, and several European countries. OLS results revealed that police legitimacy remains a crucial predictor of public willingness to obey and cooperate with the police. However, fears experienced during the pandemic failed to directly predict public's obligation to obey the police and their willingness to cooperate with the police. Interestingly, fear had an indirect effect on the relationship between police legitimacy and the obligation to obey and cooperate with the police. Conceptualizations of police legitimacy should continue to be tested, alternative versions of surveying without the limitations of COVID-19 should be undertaken, and attempts to understand more local environments should be made.
{"title":"Public Perceptions of the Police During COVID-19: A Cross-National Analysis","authors":"Joselyne L. Chenane, Amber Horning, Sean Perry, Catherine Stevens","doi":"10.1177/07340168231198127","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07340168231198127","url":null,"abstract":"Using cross-national data collected during the pandemic, this study examines factors influencing public willingness to obey and cooperate with police during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data for the study were garnered using web-based surveys, which yielded about 500 participants from the U.S., India, Brazil, Kenya, and several European countries. OLS results revealed that police legitimacy remains a crucial predictor of public willingness to obey and cooperate with the police. However, fears experienced during the pandemic failed to directly predict public's obligation to obey the police and their willingness to cooperate with the police. Interestingly, fear had an indirect effect on the relationship between police legitimacy and the obligation to obey and cooperate with the police. Conceptualizations of police legitimacy should continue to be tested, alternative versions of surveying without the limitations of COVID-19 should be undertaken, and attempts to understand more local environments should be made.","PeriodicalId":40065,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Review","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135885122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-06DOI: 10.1177/07340168231200451
Ava T. Carcirieri
{"title":"Book Review: Justice Outsourced: The Therapeutic Jurisprudence Implications of Judicial Decision-Making by Nonjudicial Officers by Perlin, M. L., & Frailing, K.","authors":"Ava T. Carcirieri","doi":"10.1177/07340168231200451","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07340168231200451","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":40065,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49105602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-28DOI: 10.1177/07340168231196995
Dakota Wing
When Mirandizing a suspect, officers sometimes compare the Mirandizing process to their representation on TV. In doing so, officers assume the suspect (and more generally the American public) is familiar with, and understands, their Miranda warnings due to their dissemination on TV. Thus, this paper investigates how the Mirandizing process is presented on TV. An analysis of arrests and custodial interviews on Law & Order: SVU indicates that fictional suspects are rarely adequately Mirandized; they are either not Mirandized at all or are provided a partial version. Moreover, suspects on TV are found to attempt to explicitly invoke their rights only 11% of the time, of which there is about a 50–50 chance of the attempted invocation being successful. In 23% of the time, legal representation appears without any language from the suspect showing them invoking their rights. Attempted and implied invocations on TV are primarily made by persons guilty of the crime they are being accused of, and innocent suspects primarily waive their rights, reinforcing a popular belief that guilty people invoke their rights and innocent people waive them.
{"title":"“It's Just Like on TV”: An Analysis of the Mirandizing Process on TV","authors":"Dakota Wing","doi":"10.1177/07340168231196995","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07340168231196995","url":null,"abstract":"When Mirandizing a suspect, officers sometimes compare the Mirandizing process to their representation on TV. In doing so, officers assume the suspect (and more generally the American public) is familiar with, and understands, their Miranda warnings due to their dissemination on TV. Thus, this paper investigates how the Mirandizing process is presented on TV. An analysis of arrests and custodial interviews on Law & Order: SVU indicates that fictional suspects are rarely adequately Mirandized; they are either not Mirandized at all or are provided a partial version. Moreover, suspects on TV are found to attempt to explicitly invoke their rights only 11% of the time, of which there is about a 50–50 chance of the attempted invocation being successful. In 23% of the time, legal representation appears without any language from the suspect showing them invoking their rights. Attempted and implied invocations on TV are primarily made by persons guilty of the crime they are being accused of, and innocent suspects primarily waive their rights, reinforcing a popular belief that guilty people invoke their rights and innocent people waive them.","PeriodicalId":40065,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49069756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-23DOI: 10.1177/07340168231195336
N. A. Jackson
{"title":"Book Review: Imperfect Victims: Criminalized Survivors and the Promise of Abolition Feminism by Goodmark, L.","authors":"N. A. Jackson","doi":"10.1177/07340168231195336","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07340168231195336","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":40065,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48179579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：