首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Austrian Studies最新文献

英文 中文
"Yugoslavia Does Not Exist Anymore, but Yugoslavia's Capital Does, and It Is Called Vienna": Revisiting Vienna through the Lens of (Post-)Yugoslav Migration Practices "南斯拉夫已不复存在,但南斯拉夫的首都还在,它叫维也纳":从(后)南斯拉夫移民实践的角度重访维也纳
IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.1353/oas.2023.a914874
Julia Anna Tyll-Schranz

Abstract:

Austrian history since the second half of the twentieth century is a history of immigration and thus a history of transregional entanglements. The fact that people from all over the world now live in Austria has changed how events all over the world shape the country's history. This article explores the long history of Vienna as a (post-)Yugoslav city as well as the effect of Yugoslavia's violent disintegration in the 1990s on the city's migrant communities from the region. Revisiting Austria's capital through the lens of (post-)Yugoslav migration practices serves as a case study from which to draw broader conclusions for new directions in Austrian Studies.

摘要:二十世纪下半叶以来的奥地利历史是一部移民史,因此也是一部跨区域纠葛史。来自世界各地的人们现在居住在奥地利,这一事实改变了世界各地发生的事件对奥地利历史的影响。本文探讨了维也纳作为(后)南斯拉夫城市的悠久历史,以及 20 世纪 90 年代南斯拉夫暴力解体对该地区移民社区的影响。通过(后)南斯拉夫移民实践的视角重新审视奥地利首都,可作为一项案例研究,从中得出更广泛的结论,为奥地利研究指明新方向。
{"title":"\"Yugoslavia Does Not Exist Anymore, but Yugoslavia's Capital Does, and It Is Called Vienna\": Revisiting Vienna through the Lens of (Post-)Yugoslav Migration Practices","authors":"Julia Anna Tyll-Schranz","doi":"10.1353/oas.2023.a914874","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2023.a914874","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>Austrian history since the second half of the twentieth century is a history of immigration and thus a history of transregional entanglements. The fact that people from all over the world now live in Austria has changed how events all over the world shape the country's history. This article explores the long history of Vienna as a (post-)Yugoslav city as well as the effect of Yugoslavia's violent disintegration in the 1990s on the city's migrant communities from the region. Revisiting Austria's capital through the lens of (post-)Yugoslav migration practices serves as a case study from which to draw broader conclusions for new directions in Austrian Studies.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":40350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Austrian Studies","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138692181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Glanz und Elend der Aufklärung in Wien. Voraussetzungen—Institutionen—Texte by Norbert Christian Wolf (review) 维也纳启蒙运动的辉煌与苦难。诺贝特-克里斯蒂安-沃尔夫的《先决条件-制度-文本》(评论)
IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.1353/oas.2023.a914879
Wynfrid Kriegleder
<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span><p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Glanz und Elend der Aufklärung in Wien. Voraussetzungen—Institutionen—Texte</em> by Norbert Christian Wolf <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Wynfrid Kriegleder </li> </ul> Norbert Christian Wolf, <em>Glanz und Elend der Aufklärung in Wien. Voraussetzungen—Institutionen—Texte</em>. Wien: Böhlau 2023. 451 S. <p>Norbert Christian Wolfs Bilanz der literarischen Aufklärung in Wien—in erster Linie: des josephinischen Jahrzehnts (1780–1790)—ist quasi eine Parallelaktion zu Franz Leander Fillafers historiographischer Studie von 2020, <em>Aufklärung habsburgisch. Staatsbildung, Wissenskultur und Geschichtspolitik in Zentraleuropa 1750–1850</em>. Wolf wählt einen literatursoziologischen Zugang. Seine Gewährsleute sind Pierre Bourdieu im Allgemeinen und Alain Viala mit seiner Rekonstruktion des Pariser literarischen Felds seit dem späten 17. Jahrhundert, <em>Naissance de l'ècrivaine. Sociologie de la littérature à l'âge classique</em> von 1985.</p> <p>Der komparatistische Zugang (Wien versus Paris) ist einer der großen Pluspunkte dieser Untersuchung. Denn eine Analyse des Literaturbetriebs in der Metropole Wien muss sich an vergleichbaren Phänomenen in anderen Metropolen orientieren, an Paris oder London, und nicht an den Geschehnissen in deutschen Provinzstädten wie Leipzig oder Weimar—oder auch Berlin, das in den 1780er Jahren noch lange keine Metropole war, trotz gegenteiliger Meinung der deutschen Germanistik seit dem 19. Jahrhundert.</p> <p>Freilich ist die Differenz zwischen Paris und Wien erheblich, wie Wolf betont: Anders als dort, wo die französische Sprache zum Integrationsfaktor für die Nation wurde, gab es in Wien, der Hauptstadt des multilingualen Habsburger Imperiums, keinen Bedarf der höfischen Gesellschaft an <strong>[End Page 102]</strong> einer deutschsprachigen Literatur, deshalb auch keinen besonderen Distinktionsgewinn für Autoren, keine nennenswerten Akademien und Salons—und es kam auch nicht zur Etablierung eines autonomen literarischen Feldes. Die Literatur der josephinischen Aufklärung blieb im Wesentlichen heteronom bestimmt, engagierte sich politisch, ließ sich kaum auf ästhetische Debatten ein und wurde daher aus dem Kanon der deutschsprachigen Literatur ausgeschlossen, der sich an den Autonomievorstellungen der Weimarer Klassiker orientieren sollte.</p> <p>Das Buch besteht aus drei Abschnitten. Zuerst geht es um "Probleme einer Literaturgeschichte der österreichischen Aufklärung". Wolf referiert das Klischee der preußen-zentrierten Germanistik vom rückständigen süddeutschen Raum, in den die Aufklärung kaum vorgedrungen sei. Gegen die gelegentlichen Forderungen nach einem regionalgeschichtlichen Zugang zur österreichischen Literatur betont er die gerade seit der Aufklärung immer stärker werdende Entregionalisierung. Der Rezensent merkt zusätzlich an: Sofern man deutsch(sprachig)e Li
不过,沃尔夫在此可能很少考虑到奥地利文学体系的一个特点:许多公务员作家并没有个人作品。
{"title":"Glanz und Elend der Aufklärung in Wien. Voraussetzungen—Institutionen—Texte by Norbert Christian Wolf (review)","authors":"Wynfrid Kriegleder","doi":"10.1353/oas.2023.a914879","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2023.a914879","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;In lieu of&lt;/span&gt; an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:&lt;/span&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt; &lt;span&gt;Reviewed by:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;!-- html_title --&gt; &lt;em&gt;Glanz und Elend der Aufklärung in Wien. Voraussetzungen—Institutionen—Texte&lt;/em&gt; by Norbert Christian Wolf &lt;!-- /html_title --&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt; Wynfrid Kriegleder &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; Norbert Christian Wolf, &lt;em&gt;Glanz und Elend der Aufklärung in Wien. Voraussetzungen—Institutionen—Texte&lt;/em&gt;. Wien: Böhlau 2023. 451 S. &lt;p&gt;Norbert Christian Wolfs Bilanz der literarischen Aufklärung in Wien—in erster Linie: des josephinischen Jahrzehnts (1780–1790)—ist quasi eine Parallelaktion zu Franz Leander Fillafers historiographischer Studie von 2020, &lt;em&gt;Aufklärung habsburgisch. Staatsbildung, Wissenskultur und Geschichtspolitik in Zentraleuropa 1750–1850&lt;/em&gt;. Wolf wählt einen literatursoziologischen Zugang. Seine Gewährsleute sind Pierre Bourdieu im Allgemeinen und Alain Viala mit seiner Rekonstruktion des Pariser literarischen Felds seit dem späten 17. Jahrhundert, &lt;em&gt;Naissance de l'ècrivaine. Sociologie de la littérature à l'âge classique&lt;/em&gt; von 1985.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Der komparatistische Zugang (Wien versus Paris) ist einer der großen Pluspunkte dieser Untersuchung. Denn eine Analyse des Literaturbetriebs in der Metropole Wien muss sich an vergleichbaren Phänomenen in anderen Metropolen orientieren, an Paris oder London, und nicht an den Geschehnissen in deutschen Provinzstädten wie Leipzig oder Weimar—oder auch Berlin, das in den 1780er Jahren noch lange keine Metropole war, trotz gegenteiliger Meinung der deutschen Germanistik seit dem 19. Jahrhundert.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Freilich ist die Differenz zwischen Paris und Wien erheblich, wie Wolf betont: Anders als dort, wo die französische Sprache zum Integrationsfaktor für die Nation wurde, gab es in Wien, der Hauptstadt des multilingualen Habsburger Imperiums, keinen Bedarf der höfischen Gesellschaft an &lt;strong&gt;[End Page 102]&lt;/strong&gt; einer deutschsprachigen Literatur, deshalb auch keinen besonderen Distinktionsgewinn für Autoren, keine nennenswerten Akademien und Salons—und es kam auch nicht zur Etablierung eines autonomen literarischen Feldes. Die Literatur der josephinischen Aufklärung blieb im Wesentlichen heteronom bestimmt, engagierte sich politisch, ließ sich kaum auf ästhetische Debatten ein und wurde daher aus dem Kanon der deutschsprachigen Literatur ausgeschlossen, der sich an den Autonomievorstellungen der Weimarer Klassiker orientieren sollte.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Das Buch besteht aus drei Abschnitten. Zuerst geht es um \"Probleme einer Literaturgeschichte der österreichischen Aufklärung\". Wolf referiert das Klischee der preußen-zentrierten Germanistik vom rückständigen süddeutschen Raum, in den die Aufklärung kaum vorgedrungen sei. Gegen die gelegentlichen Forderungen nach einem regionalgeschichtlichen Zugang zur österreichischen Literatur betont er die gerade seit der Aufklärung immer stärker werdende Entregionalisierung. Der Rezensent merkt zusätzlich an: Sofern man deutsch(sprachig)e Li","PeriodicalId":40350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Austrian Studies","volume":"197 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138692336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Klimt Inspired by Van Gogh, Rodin, Matisse ed. by Van Gogh Museum Amsterdam and Belvedere Museum (review) 克林姆受梵高、罗丹、马蒂斯启发》,阿姆斯特丹梵高博物馆和美景博物馆编(评论)
IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.1353/oas.2023.a914882
Beret Norman
<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span><p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Klimt Inspired by Van Gogh, Rodin, Matisse</em> ed. by Van Gogh Museum Amsterdam and Belvedere Museum <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Beret Norman </li> </ul> Van Gogh Museum Amsterdam and Belvedere Museum, eds., <em>Klimt Inspired by Van Gogh, Rodin, Matisse</em>. Munich: Hirmer, 2022. 240 pp. <p>This substantial and beautiful book and its corresponding exhibition celebrate the three-hundredth anniversary of the Belvedere and form a prelude to the fifty-year jubilee marking the Van Gogh Museum's opening. With the placement of works by Klimt next to so many famous works, the curators insightfully display their case for the influence of prominent Western European artists on Gustav Klimt. Starting in Amsterdam (October 7, 2022–January 8, 2023) with the title "Golden Boy Gustav Klimt: Inspired by Van Gogh, Rodin, Matisse …," the exhibition moved to Vienna's Belvedere Museum (February 7–May 29, 2023) with a shortened title: "Klimt. Inspired by Van Gogh, Rodin, Matisse…." With research consisting of letters from Klimt and others and contemporaneous art criticism by Hermann Bahr, Ludwig Hevesi, and Berta Zuckerkandl, the authors uniquely place Klimt at specific exhibitions and in private homes with art collections. These new insights into where Klimt would have seen European art undergird this exhibition's claim: that many European artists' works influenced Klimt's own paintings.</p> <p>Following an eight-page chronological history, "Klimt and his Time," nine pages of artworks follow and visually present how Klimt's oeuvre reflects the styles of other major Western artists. Each side of the fold presents a painting by Klimt juxtaposed with one by another European artist; in addition to Van Gogh, the works set next to Klimt's are by American expatriate portraitist John Singer Sargent, French painters Edmond Aman-Jean and Claude Monet, Scottish artist Margaret Macdonald Mackintosh, American painter James Abbott McNeil Whistler, French artists Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec and Henri Matisse, and another Dutch painter, Kees van Dongen. After these images, seven articles about Klimt make up the rest of the book.</p> <p>A team from the Van Gogh Museum—Lisa Smit, Renske Suijver, and Edwin Becker—pens the first article, "Shaking Viennese Art from its Slumber," which points out how very few established Western European artists visited Vienna. Indeed, a commonly heard criticism at the end of the nineteenth century was that "Vienna was deprived of the latest developments" (59).</p> <p>The Belvedere's Markus Fellinger writes the second and third articles. In the second, "Klimt's Engagement with International Art," Fellinger recounts Klimt's limited exposure before 1903 and then an onslaught of exposures to <strong>[End Page 111]</strong> modern artworks, including Klimt's first trip to Berlin in 1905, then to London an
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 克林姆受梵高、罗丹、马蒂斯启发》,阿姆斯特丹梵高博物馆和贝尔维德博物馆贝雷特-诺曼编,《克林姆受梵高、罗丹、马蒂斯启发》。慕尼黑:Hirmer,2022 年。240 页。这本内容充实、美轮美奂的书及其相应的展览是为了庆祝美景宫三百周年,同时也是梵高博物馆开馆五十年庆典的前奏。策展人将克里姆特的作品与众多名作放在一起,深刻地展示了西欧著名艺术家对古斯塔夫-克里姆特的影响。展览从阿姆斯特丹开始(2022 年 10 月 7 日至 2023 年 1 月 8 日),标题为 "金童古斯塔夫-克里姆特:梵高、罗丹、马蒂斯......的启发",随后移师维也纳美景宫博物馆(2023 年 2 月 7 日至 5 月 29 日),标题缩短为 "克里姆特:"克林姆。灵感来自梵高、罗丹、马蒂斯...."通过研究克林姆和其他人的信件,以及赫尔曼-巴尔(Hermann Bahr)、路德维希-赫维西(Ludwig Hevesi)和贝尔塔-祖克坎德尔(Berta Zuckerkandl)的同时期艺术评论,作者独特地将克林姆置于特定展览和私人艺术收藏之家。这些关于克里姆特会在哪里看到欧洲艺术的新见解,为本次展览的主张提供了依据:许多欧洲艺术家的作品影响了克里姆特自己的绘画。在八页的编年史 "克里姆特和他的时代 "之后,九页的艺术作品直观地展示了克里姆特的作品如何反映了其他主要西方艺术家的风格。折页的每一面都展示了一幅克里姆特的画作和另一位欧洲艺术家的画作;除了梵高,克里姆特旁边的作品还包括美国外籍肖像画家约翰-辛格-萨金特、法国画家埃德蒙-阿曼-让和克劳德-莫奈、苏格兰艺术家玛格丽特-麦克唐纳-麦金托什、美国画家詹姆斯-阿博特-麦克尼尔-惠斯勒、法国艺术家亨利-德-图卢兹-劳特累克和亨利-马蒂斯以及另一位荷兰画家基斯-范东根的作品。在这些图片之后,是关于克里姆特的七篇文章。来自梵高博物馆的一个团队--丽莎-斯密特(Lisa Smit)、伦斯克-绥弗(Renske Suijver)和埃德温-贝克尔(Edwin Becker)--撰写了第一篇文章 "让维也纳艺术从沉睡中苏醒",指出很少有知名的西欧艺术家访问维也纳。事实上,十九世纪末经常听到的批评是 "维也纳被剥夺了最新的发展"(59)。美景宫的 Markus Fellinger 撰写了第二和第三篇文章。在第二篇题为 "克里姆特与国际艺术的接触 "的文章中,Fellinger 讲述了克里姆特在 1903 年之前的有限接触,以及随后对 [End Page 111] 现代艺术作品的大量接触,其中包括克里姆特在 1905 年首次前往柏林,随后在 1906 年前往伦敦和布鲁塞尔,以及在 1909 年逗留巴黎。在第三部分 "克里姆特的早期作品 "中,费林格认为克里姆特对西欧现代艺术的发展了解不够,因此克里姆特从学术沙龙画家转变为前卫艺术家的时间较晚(107)。梵高博物馆的埃德温-贝克尔撰写了第四篇短文 "有灵魂的艺术:克里姆特对内在美的迷恋"。这篇文章详细比较了克林姆与英荷艺术家劳伦斯-阿尔玛-塔德玛、克诺普夫、萨金特和惠斯勒作品相似的九幅以上作品,特别是关于主观性、线条的和谐,甚至梦幻般的氛围等方面,值得一读。最后三篇文章可能是最好的,因为每篇文章都对背景进行了深入研究,并对克林姆受到的西方影响进行了发人深省的讨论。玛丽安-比桑兹-普拉克肯(Marian Bisanz-Prakken,曾任维也纳阿尔贝蒂娜美术馆馆长)在她的文章 "克里姆特和 1900 年前后的国际艺术 "中重点讨论了人类的状况和克里姆特的 "纪念碑艺术"。其中对荷兰-印尼画家扬-托罗普(Jan Toorop)、比利时艺术家乔治-明尼(George Minne)、英国艺术家玛格丽特-麦克唐纳-麦金托什(Margaret Macdonald-Mackintosh)和瑞士艺术家费迪南德-霍德勒(Ferdinand Hodler)的不同作品的描述尤其值得一看。Bisanz-Prakken 指出,克里姆特在创作不朽的《贝多芬浮雕》(1901-02 年)时,"提炼了这些艺术家各自的精髓"(144)。Renske Suijver(梵高博物馆)撰写的 "风格化风景 "一文将克里姆特的方形风景画视为 "自然之窗"(190)。Suijver 指出了梵高对克林姆 1909 年之后的风景画的影响;克林姆使用了 "成熟的造型手段[并]转换了内在的能量......"。
{"title":"Klimt Inspired by Van Gogh, Rodin, Matisse ed. by Van Gogh Museum Amsterdam and Belvedere Museum (review)","authors":"Beret Norman","doi":"10.1353/oas.2023.a914882","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2023.a914882","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;In lieu of&lt;/span&gt; an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:&lt;/span&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt; &lt;span&gt;Reviewed by:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;!-- html_title --&gt; &lt;em&gt;Klimt Inspired by Van Gogh, Rodin, Matisse&lt;/em&gt; ed. by Van Gogh Museum Amsterdam and Belvedere Museum &lt;!-- /html_title --&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt; Beret Norman &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; Van Gogh Museum Amsterdam and Belvedere Museum, eds., &lt;em&gt;Klimt Inspired by Van Gogh, Rodin, Matisse&lt;/em&gt;. Munich: Hirmer, 2022. 240 pp. &lt;p&gt;This substantial and beautiful book and its corresponding exhibition celebrate the three-hundredth anniversary of the Belvedere and form a prelude to the fifty-year jubilee marking the Van Gogh Museum's opening. With the placement of works by Klimt next to so many famous works, the curators insightfully display their case for the influence of prominent Western European artists on Gustav Klimt. Starting in Amsterdam (October 7, 2022–January 8, 2023) with the title \"Golden Boy Gustav Klimt: Inspired by Van Gogh, Rodin, Matisse …,\" the exhibition moved to Vienna's Belvedere Museum (February 7–May 29, 2023) with a shortened title: \"Klimt. Inspired by Van Gogh, Rodin, Matisse….\" With research consisting of letters from Klimt and others and contemporaneous art criticism by Hermann Bahr, Ludwig Hevesi, and Berta Zuckerkandl, the authors uniquely place Klimt at specific exhibitions and in private homes with art collections. These new insights into where Klimt would have seen European art undergird this exhibition's claim: that many European artists' works influenced Klimt's own paintings.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Following an eight-page chronological history, \"Klimt and his Time,\" nine pages of artworks follow and visually present how Klimt's oeuvre reflects the styles of other major Western artists. Each side of the fold presents a painting by Klimt juxtaposed with one by another European artist; in addition to Van Gogh, the works set next to Klimt's are by American expatriate portraitist John Singer Sargent, French painters Edmond Aman-Jean and Claude Monet, Scottish artist Margaret Macdonald Mackintosh, American painter James Abbott McNeil Whistler, French artists Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec and Henri Matisse, and another Dutch painter, Kees van Dongen. After these images, seven articles about Klimt make up the rest of the book.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;A team from the Van Gogh Museum—Lisa Smit, Renske Suijver, and Edwin Becker—pens the first article, \"Shaking Viennese Art from its Slumber,\" which points out how very few established Western European artists visited Vienna. Indeed, a commonly heard criticism at the end of the nineteenth century was that \"Vienna was deprived of the latest developments\" (59).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The Belvedere's Markus Fellinger writes the second and third articles. In the second, \"Klimt's Engagement with International Art,\" Fellinger recounts Klimt's limited exposure before 1903 and then an onslaught of exposures to &lt;strong&gt;[End Page 111]&lt;/strong&gt; modern artworks, including Klimt's first trip to Berlin in 1905, then to London an","PeriodicalId":40350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Austrian Studies","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138692538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
On the Dynamics of Kinship in Migration Processes: Some Perspectives from Historical-Anthropological Studies on North Macedonian migrants in Austria 论移民过程中的亲属关系动态:奥地利北马其顿移民历史人类学研究的一些视角
IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.1353/oas.2023.a914875
Darko Leitner-Stojanov, Robert Pichler

Abstract:

Based on two case studies of immigrants from North Macedonia to Vienna, this article sheds light on the dynamics of kinship in the migration process with regard to immigration, settlement and post-migration. The authors argue that the embeddedness in close trans-local social networks facilitates the access to accommodation and jobs; it also enables a certain degree of psychosocial well-being through mutual support and appears to be advantageous when setting up businesses and homeland associations. By placing kinship at the center of attention, it is essential to acknowledge its cultural diversity in order to avoid western-centric concepts of kinship that differ from concepts predominant in parts of southeastern Europe.

摘要:本文基于对从北马其顿到维也纳的移民的两个案例研究,揭示了移民过程中亲属关系在移民、定居和移民后方面的动态变化。作者认为,嵌入紧密的跨地方社会网络有利于获得住宿和工作,还能通过相互支持获得一定程度的社会心理健康,在建立企业和家乡协会时似乎也很有利。通过将亲缘关系置于关注的中心,必须承认其文化多样性,以避免以西方为中心的亲缘关系概念与在东南欧部分地区占主导地位的概念不同。
{"title":"On the Dynamics of Kinship in Migration Processes: Some Perspectives from Historical-Anthropological Studies on North Macedonian migrants in Austria","authors":"Darko Leitner-Stojanov, Robert Pichler","doi":"10.1353/oas.2023.a914875","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2023.a914875","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>Based on two case studies of immigrants from North Macedonia to Vienna, this article sheds light on the dynamics of kinship in the migration process with regard to immigration, settlement and post-migration. The authors argue that the embeddedness in close trans-local social networks facilitates the access to accommodation and jobs; it also enables a certain degree of psychosocial well-being through mutual support and appears to be advantageous when setting up businesses and homeland associations. By placing kinship at the center of attention, it is essential to acknowledge its cultural diversity in order to avoid western-centric concepts of kinship that differ from concepts predominant in parts of southeastern Europe.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":40350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Austrian Studies","volume":"152 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138692180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Combating the Hydra: Violence and Resistance in the Habsburg Empire, 1500–1900 by Stephan Steiner (review) 打击九头蛇:哈布斯堡帝国的暴力与反抗,1500-1900 年》,斯特凡-斯坦纳著(评论)
IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.1353/oas.2023.a914878
Samuel Kessler
<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span><p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Combating the Hydra: Violence and Resistance in the Habsburg Empire, 1500–1900</em> by Stephan Steiner <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Samuel Kessler </li> </ul> Stephan Steiner, <em>Combating the Hydra: Violence and Resistance in the Habsburg Empire, 1500–1900</em>. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue UP, 2023. 253 pp. <p>Violence is ubiquitous. It takes many forms and is a central part of historical narrative—consider the number of books focused on great wars, battles, generals, conquerors, and empire builders. Every victory or national accomplishment is predicated on violence. And not only on violence in the abstract, but violence as a series of deeply intimate actions between one individual and another, repeated time and again, be it simultaneously (say by many men against many men all at once, as on a field of battle) or in series (say by one man day after day toward one new person after another, as by an executioner or a vice officer). Violence is such a deep part of human society that it can be both all-consuming and totally invisible, the premise of nearly every novel or TV show yet likewise entirely absent from the narratives of our own lives, something that we say—if we are lucky—happens to someone else, somewhere else.</p> <p>In <em>Combating the Hydra: Violence and Resistance in the Habsburg Empire, 1500–1900</em>, Stephan Steiner uses the language and theories of the history of violence to illuminate a vast new field of inquiry in Habsburg Studies. Steiner's passion lies in early modernity, a period, he points out, that scholars of violence have long identified as a key moment in the evolution of state-sponsored violence, creating forms of coercive state power that we usually identify as uniquely modern (such as forced deportations and scientifically grounded population management). As Steiner puts it, "Wherever … state violence occurred in the early modern period, the relationship between ruler and subject, which had always been tense, emerged in its most unvarnished <strong>[End Page 99]</strong> form. Never were subjects more subjected and sovereigns more sovereign than in outbursts of state violence" (xv).</p> <p>In this book, Steiner's focus is generally on the Empire's periphery, which, though not as far flung as the borderlands of the British or Spanish empires, nonetheless continues to occupy (no doubt because of its often obscure dialects and ethnic compositions) a more or less overshadowed space in the mainstream history of the Habsburg Europe. (How many university students in Vienna today—let alone in Berlin, Paris, or New York—could identify the location of a place as historically consequential as the Banat, the focus of chapter 2? Or supply a single fact about Gypsy slavery in the monasteries of Bukovina, the focus of chapter 10?) This is, therefore, not a book about Habsburg cour
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 打击九头蛇:哈布斯堡帝国的暴力与反抗,1500-1900 年》,作者:斯蒂芬-斯坦纳 Samuel Kessler 斯蒂芬-斯坦纳,《打击九头蛇:哈布斯堡帝国的暴力与反抗,1500-1900 年》。印第安纳州西拉法叶:普渡大学出版社,2023 年。253 pp.暴力无处不在。它有多种形式,是历史叙事的核心部分--想想看,有多少书籍专注于伟大的战争、战役、将军、征服者和帝国建设者。每一次胜利或国家成就都以暴力为前提。不仅是抽象的暴力,暴力还是一个人与另一个人之间一系列亲密无间的行为,一次又一次地重复,无论是同时发生(比如许多人同时对许多人,就像在战场上),还是成系列地发生(比如一个人日复一日地对一个又一个新的人,就像刽子手或副官)。暴力是人类社会如此深刻的一部分,以至于它既可以是无孔不入的,也可以是完全隐形的,它几乎是每部小说或电视剧的前提,但在我们自己的生活叙事中同样完全缺席,我们说--如果我们幸运的话--它发生在别人身上,发生在别的地方。在《对抗九头蛇:哈布斯堡帝国的暴力与反抗,1500-1900 年》一书中,斯蒂芬-斯坦纳使用暴力史的语言和理论,为哈布斯堡研究开辟了一个广阔的新领域。斯坦纳对现代早期充满热情,他指出,研究暴力问题的学者早已将这一时期视为国家支持的暴力演变的关键时刻,这一时期创造了我们通常认为是现代独有的国家强制权力形式(如强制驱逐和以科学为依据的人口管理)。正如斯坦纳所说:"在近代早期,无论......国家暴力发生在哪里,统治者与臣民之间一向紧张的关系都会以最赤裸裸的 [第 99 页完] 形式出现。在国家暴力的爆发中,臣民和君主之间的关系从未像现在这样紧张"(xv)。在这本书中,施泰纳的重点通常放在帝国的边缘地区,虽然它不像大英帝国或西班牙帝国的边境地区那样遥远,但在哈布斯堡欧洲的主流历史中,它仍然或多或少地占据着一席之地(毫无疑问,这是因为它的方言和民族构成往往晦涩难懂)。(如今在维也纳,别说是在柏林、巴黎或纽约,又有多少大学生能说出像第二章的重点--巴纳特这样具有历史意义的地方的位置呢?因此,这不是一本关于哈布斯堡宫廷政治的书(尽管宫廷政治不可避免地影响着君主制度中的一切),而是关于在从早期现代到现代的几个世纪中,被哈布斯堡国家权力这根长棍的钝头推来推去、监禁、流放、折磨、谋杀或以其他方式残害的人及其社区。打击九头蛇》由一系列相互关联的文章组成,正如斯坦纳所说,这些文章 "有着共同的兴趣:了解哈布斯堡帝国不同形式的国家暴力,探索抵抗的条件、可能性和局限性"(xvi)。该书本身分为四个部分,前三个部分是历史论文集,第四部分是斯坦纳与意大利著名历史学家卡洛-金兹堡的对话记录。没有一篇文章特别长,而且每篇文章都包含足够的一般背景和相关提示,便于本科生阅读,但每篇文章都以新的档案材料为基础,从而揭示了哈布斯堡国家暴力史中一些以前不为人知的内容。作为一名对一般历史有所了解,但对法律权力的具体个人影响并不特别了解的读者,我发现自己一次又一次地被斯坦纳发现的各种事件和资料所震惊和吸引。第一部分侧重于哈布斯堡王朝土地上的驱逐和强迫劳动。虽然所有读者都会熟悉早期最大规模的驱逐事件,但这并不意味着我们对这些事件的了解不够。
{"title":"Combating the Hydra: Violence and Resistance in the Habsburg Empire, 1500–1900 by Stephan Steiner (review)","authors":"Samuel Kessler","doi":"10.1353/oas.2023.a914878","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2023.a914878","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;In lieu of&lt;/span&gt; an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:&lt;/span&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt; &lt;span&gt;Reviewed by:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;!-- html_title --&gt; &lt;em&gt;Combating the Hydra: Violence and Resistance in the Habsburg Empire, 1500–1900&lt;/em&gt; by Stephan Steiner &lt;!-- /html_title --&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt; Samuel Kessler &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; Stephan Steiner, &lt;em&gt;Combating the Hydra: Violence and Resistance in the Habsburg Empire, 1500–1900&lt;/em&gt;. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue UP, 2023. 253 pp. &lt;p&gt;Violence is ubiquitous. It takes many forms and is a central part of historical narrative—consider the number of books focused on great wars, battles, generals, conquerors, and empire builders. Every victory or national accomplishment is predicated on violence. And not only on violence in the abstract, but violence as a series of deeply intimate actions between one individual and another, repeated time and again, be it simultaneously (say by many men against many men all at once, as on a field of battle) or in series (say by one man day after day toward one new person after another, as by an executioner or a vice officer). Violence is such a deep part of human society that it can be both all-consuming and totally invisible, the premise of nearly every novel or TV show yet likewise entirely absent from the narratives of our own lives, something that we say—if we are lucky—happens to someone else, somewhere else.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In &lt;em&gt;Combating the Hydra: Violence and Resistance in the Habsburg Empire, 1500–1900&lt;/em&gt;, Stephan Steiner uses the language and theories of the history of violence to illuminate a vast new field of inquiry in Habsburg Studies. Steiner's passion lies in early modernity, a period, he points out, that scholars of violence have long identified as a key moment in the evolution of state-sponsored violence, creating forms of coercive state power that we usually identify as uniquely modern (such as forced deportations and scientifically grounded population management). As Steiner puts it, \"Wherever … state violence occurred in the early modern period, the relationship between ruler and subject, which had always been tense, emerged in its most unvarnished &lt;strong&gt;[End Page 99]&lt;/strong&gt; form. Never were subjects more subjected and sovereigns more sovereign than in outbursts of state violence\" (xv).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In this book, Steiner's focus is generally on the Empire's periphery, which, though not as far flung as the borderlands of the British or Spanish empires, nonetheless continues to occupy (no doubt because of its often obscure dialects and ethnic compositions) a more or less overshadowed space in the mainstream history of the Habsburg Europe. (How many university students in Vienna today—let alone in Berlin, Paris, or New York—could identify the location of a place as historically consequential as the Banat, the focus of chapter 2? Or supply a single fact about Gypsy slavery in the monasteries of Bukovina, the focus of chapter 10?) This is, therefore, not a book about Habsburg cour","PeriodicalId":40350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Austrian Studies","volume":"298 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138692335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Introduction: Interdisciplinarity and Diversity in Austrian Studies 导言:奥地利研究的跨学科性和多样性
IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.1353/oas.2023.a914868
Tim Corbett
<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span><p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Introduction<span>Interdisciplinarity and Diversity in Austrian Studies</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Tim Corbett (bio) </li> </ul> <blockquote> <p>"An das Lugeck kham ich ongfer / Do tratten Kauffleüt hin und her / All Nation mit ir klaydung / Da wirdt gehört manch sprach und zung / Ich dacht ich wer gen Babl khommen / Wo all sprach ein anfang gnommen / Und hört ein seltzams dräsch und gschray / Von schönen sprachen mancherlay / Hebreisch, Griechisch und Lateynisch / Teütsch, Frantzösisch, Türckisch, Hispanisch / Behaimisch, Windisch, Italianisch / Hungerisch, gut Niderländisch / Natürlich Syrisch, Crabatisch / Rätzisch, Polnisch und Chaldeisch / Des volcks auch war ein grosse meng."</p> </blockquote> <blockquote> <p>[I came to the vicinity of the Lugeck, where merchants moved to and fro, all nations in their own attire. One could hear various languages and tongues, such that I thought I had arrived in Babel, whence all languages originated. And I heard a curious commotion and the clamor of various beautiful languages, Hebrew, Greek, Latin, German, French, Turkish, Hispanic, Bohemian, Wendish, Italian, Hungarian, good Dutch, and naturally Syrian, Croatian, Rhaetian, Polish, and Chaldean. And the people were very numerous.]</p> —Wolfgang Schmältzl </blockquote> <p>This depiction of the Lugeck quarter in the heart of Vienna was penned in 1547 by the pedagogue and poet Wolfgang Schmältzl, who had moved to the Austrian residential capital from the Upper Palatinate some years previously. His account is striking for several reasons: Above all else, the manifest diversity of the city's Renaissance-era population confounds the notion, still prevalent in some academic and political circles today, that Vienna was traditionally a <strong>[End Page xiii]</strong> "German" city. The gamut of vernaculars enumerated here includes not only the regional tongues spoken in the territories already then under Habsburg control (German, Hungarian, and Rhaetian, as well as "Bohemian" or Czech, "Wendish" or Slovenian, and "Crabatish" or Croatian) and of lands further afield (Italian, Dutch, and Polish); not only the languages of the burgeoning European empires of the day (such as French, "Hispanic" or Spanish, as well as notably Turkish, the official language of Austria's archrival, the Ottoman Empire); and not only the liturgical languages of the various denominations then present in the city (the Hebrew of the Jews, the Greek of the Eastern Orthodox, and the Latin of the Catholics). Vienna was also "naturally" home to speakers of "Syrian" (Arabic) and "Chaldean" (Aramaic).</p> <p>The at first seemingly innocuous terminology ascribed to the presence of Hebrew, Turkish, and Arabic speakers in particular reveals another striking characteristic of this contemporary account of Renaissance Vienna, namely that this astounding and (by today's prec
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: IntroductionInterdisciplinarity and Diversity in Austrian Studies Tim Corbett (bio) "An das Lugeck kham ich ongfer / Do tratten Kauffleüt hin und her / All Nation mit ir klaydung / Da wirdt gehört manch sprach und zung / Ich dacht ich wer gen Babl khommen / Wo all sprach ein anfang gnommen / And hört ein seltzams dräsch und gschray / Von schönen sprachen mancherlay / Hebreisch、Griechisch und Lateynisch / Teütsch, Frantzösisch, Türckisch, Hispanisch / Behaimisch, Windisch, Italianisch / Hungerisch, gut Niderländisch / Natürlich Syrisch, Crabatisch / Rätzisch, Polnisch und Chaldeisch / Des volcks auch war ein grosse meng." [我来到卢格克附近,商人们在这里来来往往,各个民族都穿着自己的服装。我听到了各种语言和方言,我以为自己来到了巴别塔,这里是所有语言的发源地。我听到了奇异的骚动和各种美丽语言的喧嚣,有希伯来语、希腊语、拉丁语、德语、法语、土耳其语、西语、波西米亚语、温迪什语、意大利语、匈牙利语、荷兰语,自然还有叙利亚语、克罗地亚语、雷蒂亚语、波兰语和迦勒底语。这些人非常多]。沃尔夫冈-施迈尔茨尔(Wolfgang Schmältzl 1547 年,教育家兼诗人沃尔夫冈-施迈尔茨尔(Wolfgang Schmältzl)从上普法尔茨迁居到奥地利首都,并在此居住数年。他的叙述之所以引人注目有几个原因:最重要的是,文艺复兴时期城市人口的明显多样性驳斥了一些学术界和政界至今仍盛行的观点,即维也纳传统上是一座[尾页 xiii]"德意志 "城市。这里列举的各种方言不仅包括当时在哈布斯堡王朝控制下的地区语言(德语、匈牙利语和雷蒂亚语,以及 "波希米亚语 "或捷克语、"温地语 "或斯洛文尼亚语和 "克拉巴特语 "或克罗地亚语),还包括更远地区的语言(意大利语、荷兰语和波兰语);不仅有当时新兴欧洲帝国的语言(如法语、"西语 "或西班牙语,特别是土耳其语,即奥地利的宿敌奥斯曼帝国的官方语言),还有当时城市中各教派的礼仪语言(犹太人的希伯来语、东正教的希腊语和天主教的拉丁语)。维也纳 "自然 "也是 "叙利亚语"(阿拉伯语)和 "迦勒底语"(阿拉米语)的发源地。对讲希伯来语、土耳其语和阿拉伯语的人的存在所使用的术语起初看似无伤大雅,但却揭示了文艺复兴时期维也纳的另一个显著特点,即这种令人震惊的、(按照今天的成见)意想不到的文化多样性不仅被视为一种 "自然 "状况,而且被视为一种 "美丽 "的东西。(新教徒在这本书的标题中被称为 "基督的暴君和刽子手",他们是这里唯一的例外,大天主教徒施迈尔茨尔(Schmältzl)在宗教改革的高峰时期撰写了这部作品)。今天,在这个时代,包括许多民选代表在内的奥地利民众中的一部分人认为叙利亚难民与 "欧洲文化 "格格不入,并认为土耳其移民所生的奥地利人并非真正属于某个想象中的 "民族 "集体、当反犹主义在整个奥地利社会(不仅是右翼)仍然盛行,向维也纳市的移民被妖魔化(不仅是激进分子),被视为对奥地利首都显然纯粹的人口血统的攻击时,上面引用的这段话,如今已过去近半个世纪,可能看起来像是自由派的虚构。实际上,正如这段历史记录所揭示的那样,今天在中欧泛滥的顽固的排外主义叙事才是虚构和反事实的。下奥地利州的一位右翼极端分子最近被任命为与执政党奥地利人民党联合执政的州议会高级官员,他向一班维也纳高中生大谈 2023 年初 "纯净 "维也纳的梦想,评论家们很快将 "1900 年的维也纳 "作为人口和文化多样性的典范。显然,这一观点可以延伸到更久远的欧洲历史。上述段落证实了一段时间以来移民 [尾页 xiv] 和文化研究的一个发现:移民和多样性在历史上不是例外,而是常态,无论是在欧洲还是在...
{"title":"Introduction: Interdisciplinarity and Diversity in Austrian Studies","authors":"Tim Corbett","doi":"10.1353/oas.2023.a914868","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2023.a914868","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;In lieu of&lt;/span&gt; an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:&lt;/span&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;!-- html_title --&gt; Introduction&lt;span&gt;Interdisciplinarity and Diversity in Austrian Studies&lt;/span&gt; &lt;!-- /html_title --&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt; Tim Corbett (bio) &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;\"An das Lugeck kham ich ongfer / Do tratten Kauffleüt hin und her / All Nation mit ir klaydung / Da wirdt gehört manch sprach und zung / Ich dacht ich wer gen Babl khommen / Wo all sprach ein anfang gnommen / Und hört ein seltzams dräsch und gschray / Von schönen sprachen mancherlay / Hebreisch, Griechisch und Lateynisch / Teütsch, Frantzösisch, Türckisch, Hispanisch / Behaimisch, Windisch, Italianisch / Hungerisch, gut Niderländisch / Natürlich Syrisch, Crabatisch / Rätzisch, Polnisch und Chaldeisch / Des volcks auch war ein grosse meng.\"&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;[I came to the vicinity of the Lugeck, where merchants moved to and fro, all nations in their own attire. One could hear various languages and tongues, such that I thought I had arrived in Babel, whence all languages originated. And I heard a curious commotion and the clamor of various beautiful languages, Hebrew, Greek, Latin, German, French, Turkish, Hispanic, Bohemian, Wendish, Italian, Hungarian, good Dutch, and naturally Syrian, Croatian, Rhaetian, Polish, and Chaldean. And the people were very numerous.]&lt;/p&gt; —Wolfgang Schmältzl &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;This depiction of the Lugeck quarter in the heart of Vienna was penned in 1547 by the pedagogue and poet Wolfgang Schmältzl, who had moved to the Austrian residential capital from the Upper Palatinate some years previously. His account is striking for several reasons: Above all else, the manifest diversity of the city's Renaissance-era population confounds the notion, still prevalent in some academic and political circles today, that Vienna was traditionally a &lt;strong&gt;[End Page xiii]&lt;/strong&gt; \"German\" city. The gamut of vernaculars enumerated here includes not only the regional tongues spoken in the territories already then under Habsburg control (German, Hungarian, and Rhaetian, as well as \"Bohemian\" or Czech, \"Wendish\" or Slovenian, and \"Crabatish\" or Croatian) and of lands further afield (Italian, Dutch, and Polish); not only the languages of the burgeoning European empires of the day (such as French, \"Hispanic\" or Spanish, as well as notably Turkish, the official language of Austria's archrival, the Ottoman Empire); and not only the liturgical languages of the various denominations then present in the city (the Hebrew of the Jews, the Greek of the Eastern Orthodox, and the Latin of the Catholics). Vienna was also \"naturally\" home to speakers of \"Syrian\" (Arabic) and \"Chaldean\" (Aramaic).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The at first seemingly innocuous terminology ascribed to the presence of Hebrew, Turkish, and Arabic speakers in particular reveals another striking characteristic of this contemporary account of Renaissance Vienna, namely that this astounding and (by today's prec","PeriodicalId":40350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Austrian Studies","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138692172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Friedrich Zweigelt (1888–1964). Wissenschaftler, Rebenzüchter, Nationalsozialist by Daniel Deckers (review) 弗里德里希-茨威格尔特(1888-1964 年)。科学家、葡萄种植者、国家社会主义者,丹尼尔-德克尔著(评论)
IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.1353/oas.2023.a914887
M. Hainz
{"title":"Friedrich Zweigelt (1888–1964). Wissenschaftler, Rebenzüchter, Nationalsozialist by Daniel Deckers (review)","authors":"M. Hainz","doi":"10.1353/oas.2023.a914887","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2023.a914887","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":40350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Austrian Studies","volume":"34 ","pages":"123 - 125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138992586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Metternich, the German Question and the Pursuit of Peace, 1840–1848 by Barbora Pásztorová (review) 梅特涅:《德国问题与对和平的追求》,1840-1848,作者:巴巴拉Pásztorová(书评)
0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1353/oas.2023.a906964
Reviewed by: Metternich, the German Question and the Pursuit of Peace, 1840–1848 by Barbora Pásztorová Tim Corbett Barbora Pásztorová, Metternich, the German Question and the Pursuit of Peace, 1840–1848. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2022. 184 pp. Prince Metternich, as the opening sentence of Barbora Pásztorová's brief monograph Metternich, the German Question and the Pursuit of Peace, 1840–1848 states, was "without question one of the greatest figures of the first half of the 19th century" (3). A key player in the 1814/15 Vienna Congress that redrew the political map of Europe and attempted to restore the old order of dynastic states, Metternich is remembered domestically in Austria as a draconian reactionary whose suppression of civil liberties and democratic reform ultimately failed to stem the rising tide of liberalism and emancipation in Central Europe. Although deposed during the 1848 revolutions, Metternich would later nevertheless come to be admired for his diplomatic achievements in maintaining the "Concert of Europe" from 1815 to 1848. It is to this latter aspect of Metternich's legacy that Pásztorová's new monograph is dedicated. It represents a revised English-language translation of her Czech-language PhD dissertation defended in 2019 at the University of West Bohemia in Plzeň. Readers will notice immediately the conspicuous brevity of this work: At only 180 pages (including the bibliography), it is considerably shorter than a standard historiographical dissertation. The primary materials consist predominantly of contemporary correspondence found in various Central European archives, augmented by a range of German-, English-, and Czech-language secondary literature. The book is divided into seven chapters plus an introduction and conclusion. [End Page 106] The first chapter opens with an overview of Metternich's role in international politics in the period between the Vienna Congress and the late 1830s, during which he promoted the German Confederation as a "counterrevolutionary" bloc and "a defensive bulwark of dynastic legitimacy" (27). The subsequent chapters focus on successive crises that challenged the peace in Europe during the 1840s and—so the author's claim—played a seminal role in what she calls the "German question," beginning with the Rhine Crisis of 1840 (Chapter 2) and the Schleswig-Holstein "question" (Chapter 3). Chapter 4, comprising only seven pages, briefly examines the economic relations between the nebulous entities here anachronistically called "Austria and Germany." This is essentially a prelude to Chapter 5, which covers the annexation of Cracow by the Habsburg Empire in 1846 and its negative economic impact on Prussian Silesia. Chapter 6 addresses the Sonderbund War in Switzerland in 1847, while Chapter 7 explores the "national and constitutional question in Germany," by which the author means the lands of the German Confederation, in the Vormärz. The title of this monograph is somewhat misleading. Metternich is not th
梅特涅,德国问题和追求和平,1840-1848,作者:Pásztorová蒂姆·科比特·巴博拉Pásztorová,梅特涅,德国问题和追求和平,1840-1848。柏林:De Gruyter, 2022。184页。梅特涅王子,作为巴尔博拉Pásztorová的简短专著《梅特涅,德国问题和对和平的追求,1840-1848年的国家》的开头一句话,“毫无疑问是19世纪上半叶最伟大的人物之一”(3)。在1814/15年维也纳会议上,他是一个关键人物,重新绘制了欧洲的政治地图,并试图恢复王朝国家的旧秩序。在奥地利国内,梅特涅被认为是一个严厉的反动分子,他对公民自由和民主改革的压制最终未能阻止中欧自由主义和解放的浪潮。尽管梅特涅在1848年的革命中被废黜,但他在1815年至1848年期间维持“欧洲协调”的外交成就使他受到钦佩。这是梅特涅的遗产的后一个方面,Pásztorová的新专著致力于。这是她2019年在普勒泽普西波西米亚大学(University of West Bohemia)发表的捷克语博士论文的修改后的英文译本。读者会立即注意到这本书的简洁:只有180页(包括参考书目),比标准的史学论文要短得多。主要材料主要包括在各种中欧档案中发现的当代信件,以及一系列德语、英语和捷克语的二手文献。全书分为七章,外加导言和结语。第一章开篇概述了梅特涅在维也纳会议至19世纪30年代后期期间在国际政治中的作用,在此期间,他将德意志邦联推广为“反革命”集团和“王朝合法性的防御堡垒”(27)。接下来的章节集中讨论了19世纪40年代期间挑战欧洲和平的连续危机,因此作者的主张在她所谓的“德国问题”中发挥了重要作用,从1840年的莱茵河危机(第二章)和石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因“问题”(第三章)开始。第四章只有七页,简要考察了这里被错误地称为“奥地利和德国”的模糊实体之间的经济关系。这实际上是第五章的前奏,第五章讲述了1846年哈布斯堡帝国对克拉科夫的吞并及其对普鲁士西里西亚的负面经济影响。第6章讨论1847年瑞士的南部邦联战争,而第7章探讨“德国的国家和宪法问题”,作者指的是Vormärz中的德意志联邦的土地。这本专著的标题有点误导人。梅特涅并不是本书的中心焦点,这本书主要是对这一时期中欧的国际关系和外交史进行概述,但梅特涅是一个反复出现的人物,在上述背景下的关键时刻发挥了关键作用。与此同时,作者从未定义“德意志问题”,他似乎毫无疑问地断言,在1870/71年德意志国家建立之前,存在着一个“德意志民族”。在整个作品中,缺乏清晰的论点使焦点的缺乏变得更加复杂,尽管写作清晰,并提供了对二手文献的简明回顾,但通常更多的是描述性叙述,而不是批判性分析。前言中对“民族主义”概念的两页半讨论,加上对所谓的“德国问题”的名义关注,表明这本书旨在为新生的德国民族主义的早期阶段做出贡献。虽然这一主题确实在整个工作中反复讨论,但这方面的发展仍然特别落后。作者以naïvely的方式开篇,将所有的民族主义理论划分为“消极的”和“中立的”方法,她明确地指的是批判的方法(正如她提到的“建构主义作者”所表明的那样),而不是社会学理论中所谓的“原始主义的”身份理论。作者含蓄地宣扬后者,保守地理解“国家认同”,她有问题地声称这是一种……
{"title":"Metternich, the German Question and the Pursuit of Peace, 1840–1848 by Barbora Pásztorová (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/oas.2023.a906964","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2023.a906964","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Metternich, the German Question and the Pursuit of Peace, 1840–1848 by Barbora Pásztorová Tim Corbett Barbora Pásztorová, Metternich, the German Question and the Pursuit of Peace, 1840–1848. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2022. 184 pp. Prince Metternich, as the opening sentence of Barbora Pásztorová's brief monograph Metternich, the German Question and the Pursuit of Peace, 1840–1848 states, was \"without question one of the greatest figures of the first half of the 19th century\" (3). A key player in the 1814/15 Vienna Congress that redrew the political map of Europe and attempted to restore the old order of dynastic states, Metternich is remembered domestically in Austria as a draconian reactionary whose suppression of civil liberties and democratic reform ultimately failed to stem the rising tide of liberalism and emancipation in Central Europe. Although deposed during the 1848 revolutions, Metternich would later nevertheless come to be admired for his diplomatic achievements in maintaining the \"Concert of Europe\" from 1815 to 1848. It is to this latter aspect of Metternich's legacy that Pásztorová's new monograph is dedicated. It represents a revised English-language translation of her Czech-language PhD dissertation defended in 2019 at the University of West Bohemia in Plzeň. Readers will notice immediately the conspicuous brevity of this work: At only 180 pages (including the bibliography), it is considerably shorter than a standard historiographical dissertation. The primary materials consist predominantly of contemporary correspondence found in various Central European archives, augmented by a range of German-, English-, and Czech-language secondary literature. The book is divided into seven chapters plus an introduction and conclusion. [End Page 106] The first chapter opens with an overview of Metternich's role in international politics in the period between the Vienna Congress and the late 1830s, during which he promoted the German Confederation as a \"counterrevolutionary\" bloc and \"a defensive bulwark of dynastic legitimacy\" (27). The subsequent chapters focus on successive crises that challenged the peace in Europe during the 1840s and—so the author's claim—played a seminal role in what she calls the \"German question,\" beginning with the Rhine Crisis of 1840 (Chapter 2) and the Schleswig-Holstein \"question\" (Chapter 3). Chapter 4, comprising only seven pages, briefly examines the economic relations between the nebulous entities here anachronistically called \"Austria and Germany.\" This is essentially a prelude to Chapter 5, which covers the annexation of Cracow by the Habsburg Empire in 1846 and its negative economic impact on Prussian Silesia. Chapter 6 addresses the Sonderbund War in Switzerland in 1847, while Chapter 7 explores the \"national and constitutional question in Germany,\" by which the author means the lands of the German Confederation, in the Vormärz. The title of this monograph is somewhat misleading. Metternich is not th","PeriodicalId":40350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Austrian Studies","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135640165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Eine unmögliche Ästhetik. Elfriede Jelinek im literarischen Feld by Uta Degner (review) 一种令人难以置信的美文(评论)
0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1353/oas.2023.a906970
Reviewed by: Eine unmögliche Ästhetik. Elfriede Jelinek im literarischen Feld by Uta Degner Margarete Lamb-Faffelberger Uta Degner, Eine unmögliche Ästhetik. Elfriede Jelinek im literarischen Feld. Literaturgeschichte in Studien und Quellen 33. Wien: Böhlau, 2022. 371 S. Die vorliegende Forschungsarbeit—basierend auf Uta Degners Habilitationsschrift—wurde wenige Wochen nach der Publikation der Anthologie Elfriede Jelinek: Provokationen der Kunst (De Gruyter, Oktober 2021), die Degner zusammen mit Christa Gürtler herausgegeben hat, im Böhlau Verlag (Dezember 2021) veröffentlicht. Während die Beiträge im Sammelband sich mit Jelineks provokativ-kritischen poetologischen und revolutionär selbstreflektierenden theaterästhetischen Konzepten auseinandersetzen, geht es in der Monografie um den ambitionierten Versuch die Genealogie der Jelinek'schen Ästhetik—von der Popliteratur der 60er Jahre (wir sind lockvögel baby!) bis zur Internetliteratur (Neid) im 21. Jahrhundert—zu erfassen. Degners Hauptinteresse gilt dabei der "zugrunde liegenden Logik der Jelinek'schen Ästhetik, ihren spezifischen Positionierungen, die es immer wieder auch erfordern, wichtige konkurrierende Ästhetiken des literarischen Feldes zu berücksichtigen" (12). Mit bemerkenswerter wissenschaftlicher Akribie erläutert sie im Einleitungskapitel ihren innovativen theoretischen Ansatz, mit dem sie sich bewusst von traditionelleren literaturwissenschaft-lichen Ästhetikanalysen absetzt. Sie greift auf Pierre Bourdieus Theorie der ästhetischen Autonomie und (quasi) "unmöglichen" posture (16) zurück und interpretiert die künstlerische Positionierung der Autorin mittels Bourdieus Habitusmodell als einen durch ihre soziale Biografie bedingten "gespaltenen Habitus": "Jelineks Konzeption ästhetischer Erfahrung ist ihrer familiären Erfahrung […] homolog" (17). Weiters stützt Degner sich auf Jerôme Meizozs Begriff der "autorschaftliche[n] posture" im literarischen Feld (14) um zu zeigen, unter welchen feldspezifischen Bedingungen sich eine nicht vorhersehbare [End Page 122] neue ("unmögliche", paradoxe) Ästhetik etablieren könne und wie relativ unkontrollierbar die Entstehung dieser neuen künstlerischen Position ist (16). Schließlich führt Degner die Anagnorisis (Aha-Effekt) als besonders sinnvoll für ihre autor-werkzentrierte Rekonstruktion der literarischen Genealogie Elfriede Jelineks an und gibt zu verstehen, die Anagnorisis für Jelineks Ästhetik bedeute nicht das Wiedererkennen, sondern die Umwandlung von Unkenntnis in Kenntnis (21). Dem Einleitungskapitel, in dem am Ende auf Verena Hollers "literarisches Feld Österreich" aufmerksam gemacht und der derzeitige Forschungsstand zu Jelineks Oeuvre knapp umrissen wird, folgen in acht Kapitel über 300 Seiten Degners interessante close readings und aufschlussreiche narratologische Analysen von Wir sind Lockvögel Baby! (Kap. 1), Die Liebhaberinnen (Kap. 2), Die Ausgesperrten (Kap. 3), Die Klavierspielerin (Kap. 5), Lust (Kap. 6), Burgtheater (Kap. 7) un
Verena Stefan和碧姬特·施威格(1884年),另一方面,Jelineks却在媒体和表演艺术家VALIE出口中还有她那强硬的女权主义
{"title":"Eine unmögliche Ästhetik. Elfriede Jelinek im literarischen Feld by Uta Degner (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/oas.2023.a906970","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2023.a906970","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Eine unmögliche Ästhetik. Elfriede Jelinek im literarischen Feld by Uta Degner Margarete Lamb-Faffelberger Uta Degner, Eine unmögliche Ästhetik. Elfriede Jelinek im literarischen Feld. Literaturgeschichte in Studien und Quellen 33. Wien: Böhlau, 2022. 371 S. Die vorliegende Forschungsarbeit—basierend auf Uta Degners Habilitationsschrift—wurde wenige Wochen nach der Publikation der Anthologie Elfriede Jelinek: Provokationen der Kunst (De Gruyter, Oktober 2021), die Degner zusammen mit Christa Gürtler herausgegeben hat, im Böhlau Verlag (Dezember 2021) veröffentlicht. Während die Beiträge im Sammelband sich mit Jelineks provokativ-kritischen poetologischen und revolutionär selbstreflektierenden theaterästhetischen Konzepten auseinandersetzen, geht es in der Monografie um den ambitionierten Versuch die Genealogie der Jelinek'schen Ästhetik—von der Popliteratur der 60er Jahre (wir sind lockvögel baby!) bis zur Internetliteratur (Neid) im 21. Jahrhundert—zu erfassen. Degners Hauptinteresse gilt dabei der \"zugrunde liegenden Logik der Jelinek'schen Ästhetik, ihren spezifischen Positionierungen, die es immer wieder auch erfordern, wichtige konkurrierende Ästhetiken des literarischen Feldes zu berücksichtigen\" (12). Mit bemerkenswerter wissenschaftlicher Akribie erläutert sie im Einleitungskapitel ihren innovativen theoretischen Ansatz, mit dem sie sich bewusst von traditionelleren literaturwissenschaft-lichen Ästhetikanalysen absetzt. Sie greift auf Pierre Bourdieus Theorie der ästhetischen Autonomie und (quasi) \"unmöglichen\" posture (16) zurück und interpretiert die künstlerische Positionierung der Autorin mittels Bourdieus Habitusmodell als einen durch ihre soziale Biografie bedingten \"gespaltenen Habitus\": \"Jelineks Konzeption ästhetischer Erfahrung ist ihrer familiären Erfahrung […] homolog\" (17). Weiters stützt Degner sich auf Jerôme Meizozs Begriff der \"autorschaftliche[n] posture\" im literarischen Feld (14) um zu zeigen, unter welchen feldspezifischen Bedingungen sich eine nicht vorhersehbare [End Page 122] neue (\"unmögliche\", paradoxe) Ästhetik etablieren könne und wie relativ unkontrollierbar die Entstehung dieser neuen künstlerischen Position ist (16). Schließlich führt Degner die Anagnorisis (Aha-Effekt) als besonders sinnvoll für ihre autor-werkzentrierte Rekonstruktion der literarischen Genealogie Elfriede Jelineks an und gibt zu verstehen, die Anagnorisis für Jelineks Ästhetik bedeute nicht das Wiedererkennen, sondern die Umwandlung von Unkenntnis in Kenntnis (21). Dem Einleitungskapitel, in dem am Ende auf Verena Hollers \"literarisches Feld Österreich\" aufmerksam gemacht und der derzeitige Forschungsstand zu Jelineks Oeuvre knapp umrissen wird, folgen in acht Kapitel über 300 Seiten Degners interessante close readings und aufschlussreiche narratologische Analysen von Wir sind Lockvögel Baby! (Kap. 1), Die Liebhaberinnen (Kap. 2), Die Ausgesperrten (Kap. 3), Die Klavierspielerin (Kap. 5), Lust (Kap. 6), Burgtheater (Kap. 7) un","PeriodicalId":40350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Austrian Studies","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135640172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Loneliness, Nature, and Technology: Questions of Embodiment in Haushofer's Die Wand and von Steinaecker's Die Verteidigung des Paradieses 《自然与科技》这本杂志出自豪森豪森的模仿
0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1353/oas.2023.a906958
Benjamin Schaper
Abstract: This article re-reads Marlen Haushofer's seminal novel Die Wand (1963) through the lenses of Sigmund Freud, Friedrich Nietzshe, and her 21st-century successor Thomas von Steinaecker. On the basis of Freud's Das Unbehagen in der Kultur (1930) and Nietzsche's notion of homo natura as elaborated in Jenseits von Gut und Böse (1886), the article first interrogates notions of loneliness depicted in Haushofer's novel, then questions the Cartesian emphasis on the mind rather than the body as creator of knowledge, and exposes the tensions created by the human drive to control nature through technology. Finally, the article undertakes a critical comparative reading of Die Wand and von Steinaecker's Die Verteidigung des Paradieses (2016). Demonstrating the influence of Haushofer on von Steinaecker's novel will reveal how crucial developments in discourses around loneliness, nature, and technology from the second half of the 20th century are reworked and reimagined for our highly technologized contemporary age.
摘要:本文通过西格蒙德·弗洛伊德、弗里德里克·尼采及其21世纪的继承者托马斯·冯·施泰纳克的视角,重新解读了马伦·豪斯霍弗的影响深远的小说《魔杖》(1963)。在弗洛伊德的《文化中的无为》(1930)和尼采在《Jenseits von Gut und Böse》(1886)中阐述的自然人概念的基础上,文章首先质疑豪斯霍弗小说中描述的孤独概念,然后质疑笛卡尔强调的精神而不是身体作为知识的创造者,并揭示了人类通过技术控制自然的动力所造成的紧张关系。最后,本文对Die Wand和von Steinaecker的Die Verteidigung des paradeses(2016)进行了批判性的比较阅读。展示豪斯霍费尔对冯·施泰纳克小说的影响,将揭示20世纪下半叶围绕孤独、自然和技术的话语的重要发展是如何为我们高度科技的当代重新设计和重新想象的。
{"title":"Loneliness, Nature, and Technology: Questions of Embodiment in Haushofer's Die Wand and von Steinaecker's Die Verteidigung des Paradieses","authors":"Benjamin Schaper","doi":"10.1353/oas.2023.a906958","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2023.a906958","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This article re-reads Marlen Haushofer's seminal novel Die Wand (1963) through the lenses of Sigmund Freud, Friedrich Nietzshe, and her 21st-century successor Thomas von Steinaecker. On the basis of Freud's Das Unbehagen in der Kultur (1930) and Nietzsche's notion of homo natura as elaborated in Jenseits von Gut und Böse (1886), the article first interrogates notions of loneliness depicted in Haushofer's novel, then questions the Cartesian emphasis on the mind rather than the body as creator of knowledge, and exposes the tensions created by the human drive to control nature through technology. Finally, the article undertakes a critical comparative reading of Die Wand and von Steinaecker's Die Verteidigung des Paradieses (2016). Demonstrating the influence of Haushofer on von Steinaecker's novel will reveal how crucial developments in discourses around loneliness, nature, and technology from the second half of the 20th century are reworked and reimagined for our highly technologized contemporary age.","PeriodicalId":40350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Austrian Studies","volume":"240 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135640174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Austrian Studies
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1