Pub Date : 2016-10-01DOI: 10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.2.0139
M. Berkowitz
There is sparse comment on the feature-length movie Gasbags (Marcel Varnel, Walter Forde, UK, 1941), which starred Bud Flanagan (1896–1968, born Chaim Weintrop), the leader of the “Crazy Gang” comedy troupe and a performer clearly marked as a Jew. Gasbags is in many respects comparable to Charlie Chaplin’s The Great Dictator (USA, 1940) and, similarly, includes a schlemiel posing as Hitler. Jewish elements are prominent in other Crazy Gang films, especially A Fire Has Been Arranged (Leslie S. Hiscott, UK, 1935) and O-Kay for Sound (Marcel Varnel, UK, 1937). What differentiates Gasbags from other expressions of wartime humor is the extent to which it confronts social-class divisions. It also reflects the degree to which the British film business was comfortable with Jewish approaches, which would change in the 1950s. The British Film Institute hails Gasbags as one of two 1940 films “so outrageously disrespectful of the Nazi menace” that it retains “a surreal effectiveness”—yet it is not often shown or studied.
长片《Gasbags》(Marcel Varnel, Walter Forde,英国,1941)很少有人评论,这部电影的主演Bud Flanagan(1896-1968,原名Chaim Weintrop)是“疯狂帮”喜剧剧团的领袖,也是一名明显的犹太人。《气囊》在很多方面都可以与查理·卓别林的《大独裁者》(1940年,美国)相媲美,同样,片中也有一个假扮希特勒的笨蛋。犹太元素在疯狂帮的其他电影中也很突出,尤其是莱斯利·s·希斯科特(1935年,英国)和马塞尔·瓦尔内尔(1937年,英国)。Gasbags与其他战时幽默表达的区别在于它面对社会阶级分歧的程度。这也反映了英国电影业对犹太方法的接受程度,这种情况在20世纪50年代发生了变化。英国电影协会称赞《气囊》是1940年两部“极度不尊重纳粹威胁”的电影之一,它保留了“一种超现实的效果”——但它并不经常被放映或研究。
{"title":"A British-Jewish Film Genre?: Consider Gasbags (1941)","authors":"M. Berkowitz","doi":"10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.2.0139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.2.0139","url":null,"abstract":"There is sparse comment on the feature-length movie Gasbags (Marcel Varnel, Walter Forde, UK, 1941), which starred Bud Flanagan (1896–1968, born Chaim Weintrop), the leader of the “Crazy Gang” comedy troupe and a performer clearly marked as a Jew. Gasbags is in many respects comparable to Charlie Chaplin’s The Great Dictator (USA, 1940) and, similarly, includes a schlemiel posing as Hitler. Jewish elements are prominent in other Crazy Gang films, especially A Fire Has Been Arranged (Leslie S. Hiscott, UK, 1935) and O-Kay for Sound (Marcel Varnel, UK, 1937). What differentiates Gasbags from other expressions of wartime humor is the extent to which it confronts social-class divisions. It also reflects the degree to which the British film business was comfortable with Jewish approaches, which would change in the 1950s. The British Film Institute hails Gasbags as one of two 1940 films “so outrageously disrespectful of the Nazi menace” that it retains “a surreal effectiveness”—yet it is not often shown or studied.","PeriodicalId":40351,"journal":{"name":"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal","volume":"100 1","pages":"139 - 160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83339857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-10-01DOI: 10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.2.0207
Miriam Spiro
On Eforgan's Leslie Howard: The Lost Actor Leslie Howard: The Lost Actor (revised 2d edition). By Estel Eforgan. London: Vallentine Mitchell, 2013. 296 pp., 978-0853039150 (pb). US $32.95.When actor and screenwriter Leslie Howard died in a mysterious plane crash over the Bay of Biscay in June 1943, the Guardian obituary described his most outstanding quality: "the intensely English quality which made him popular everywhere."1 Even today, Howard is remembered primarily for his roles as English aristocrat in films such as The Scarlet Pimpernel (Harold Young, UK, 1934) and Pygmalion (Anthony Asquith, Leslie Howard, UK, 1938), or as tragic hero in productions like Of Human Bondage ( John Cromwell, USA, 1934) and Gone with the Wind (Victor Fleming [George Cukor], USA, 1939). As a symbol of refinement and gentlemanliness, Howard's character spoke to the social instability British audiences were experiencing due to political crisis and war. It was a time when conceptions of "Englishness" were being challenged-not least because of the influx of Jewish migrants and refugees escaping persecution in Europe who created a space of difference in British society. Howard, as Estel Eforgan's meticulously researched biography, Leslie Howard: The Lost Actor, reveals, was nothing if not aware of the social and political influences of his dramatic persona.Eforgan's biography is a compelling and thorough overview of Howard's life and career within the context of social and political upheaval, migration, and war. As such it makes an important contribution to the fields of media and cultural studies, as well as Jewish studies, revealing the influential role that actors and filmmakers played in the political arena. As Eforgan uncovers, there was more to Howard's persona as "ideal Englishman" than most people consider. Leslie Howard Steiner, whose father was a Hungarian Jew and whose mother's origins were also Jewish (from Russia and East Prussia), was intensely committed to political activism and anti-Nazi efforts in the years leading up to World War II. And while the biography covers much more than that-including Howard's career on the English stage in the 1920s and the launch of his stardom in New York and Hollywood-Eforgan makes clear that by the mid-1930s Howard was making career and life choices that were influenced by politics. More specifically, he began to use his fame as a tool to resist Hitler's rise to power and the persecution of Jews in Europe.Eforgan's sympathy for her subject will strike a chord with readers and personalize the exhaustive amount of detail on Howard's life. The chapters that trace Howard's development as an actor, screenwriter, producer, director, and public intellectual from the 1920s to the 1940s are filled with lively anecdotes as well as with valuable comments on the social and cultural milieu. Some of the most entertaining points in the biography include Eforgan's musings on Howard's stage mishaps and love affairs, and the colorful cha
关于埃弗根的莱斯利·霍华德:迷失的演员莱斯利·霍华德:迷失的演员(修订的2d版)。埃斯特尔·埃弗根著。伦敦:瓦伦丁·米切尔,2013。296页,978-0853039150 (pb)。32.95美元。1943年6月,演员兼编剧莱斯利·霍华德(Leslie Howard)在比斯开湾(Bay of Biscay)神秘的飞机失事中丧生,《卫报》(Guardian)的讣告描述了他最突出的品质:“那种让他在各地都受欢迎的强烈的英国品质。”即使在今天,霍华德被人们记住的主要还是他在电影中扮演的英国贵族角色,比如《Scarlet Pimpernel》(哈罗德·扬,英国,1934)和《Pygmalion》(安东尼·阿斯奎斯,莱斯利·霍华德,英国,1938),或者是他在《人类的束缚》(约翰·克伦威尔,美国,1934)和《乱世佳人》(维克多·弗莱明[乔治·库克尔],美国,1939)中扮演的悲剧英雄。作为优雅和绅士的象征,霍华德的角色反映了英国观众因政治危机和战争而经历的社会不稳定。那是一个“英国人”观念受到挑战的时代,尤其是因为犹太移民和难民的涌入,他们逃离了欧洲的迫害,在英国社会中创造了一个不同的空间。正如埃斯特尔·埃弗根精心研究的传记《莱斯利·霍华德:迷失的演员》所揭示的那样,霍华德如果不意识到他的戏剧角色对社会和政治的影响,他什么都不是。埃弗根的传记引人注目,全面概述了霍华德在社会和政治动荡、移民和战争背景下的生活和事业。因此,它对媒体和文化研究以及犹太研究领域作出了重要贡献,揭示了演员和电影制作人在政治舞台上发挥的重要作用。正如埃弗根所揭示的,霍华德的“理想英国人”形象比大多数人想象的要多。莱斯利·霍华德·施泰纳(Leslie Howard Steiner)的父亲是匈牙利犹太人,母亲也是犹太人(来自俄罗斯和东普鲁士),在第二次世界大战前的几年里,他一直致力于政治激进主义和反纳粹的努力。虽然这本传记涵盖的内容远不止这些——包括霍华德在20世纪20年代在英国舞台上的职业生涯,以及他在纽约和好莱坞的明星生涯——但埃弗根明确指出,到30年代中期,霍华德的职业和生活选择受到了政治的影响。更具体地说,他开始利用自己的名声作为抵制希特勒上台和迫害欧洲犹太人的工具。Eforgan对主人公的同情将会引起读者的共鸣,并将霍华德生活中详尽的细节个人化。从20世纪20年代到40年代,追溯霍华德作为演员、编剧、制片人、导演和公共知识分子的发展历程的章节充满了生动的轶事,以及对社会和文化环境的宝贵评论。这本传记中最有趣的地方包括埃弗根对霍华德舞台上的不幸和爱情的思考,以及他职业和个人生活中丰富多彩的角色。然而,正是埃弗根将霍华德的职业生涯与纳粹主义兴起期间和二战开始时的犹太移民和迫害联系起来的方式,使这本传记尤为引人注目。埃弗根认为,这些因素在演员的生活中发挥了关键作用,这一点在莱斯利·霍华德鲜为人知的犹太血统的传记结尾得到了强调。这部作品以霍华德在维也纳和英国的“真实家族史”开始,以他死前的最后一次演讲结束,当时他嘲笑别人说他是“完美英国人的理想化形象”。当他公开承认“我想我们不必告诉他们我一开始是匈牙利人”时,他让新闻界感到惊讶。事实上,从埃弗根对莱斯利·霍华德背景的描述中,我们可以发现很多关于世纪之交英国犹太人移民和同化的信息。…
{"title":"On Eforgan’s Leslie Howard: The Lost Actor","authors":"Miriam Spiro","doi":"10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.2.0207","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.2.0207","url":null,"abstract":"On Eforgan's Leslie Howard: The Lost Actor Leslie Howard: The Lost Actor (revised 2d edition). By Estel Eforgan. London: Vallentine Mitchell, 2013. 296 pp., 978-0853039150 (pb). US $32.95.When actor and screenwriter Leslie Howard died in a mysterious plane crash over the Bay of Biscay in June 1943, the Guardian obituary described his most outstanding quality: \"the intensely English quality which made him popular everywhere.\"1 Even today, Howard is remembered primarily for his roles as English aristocrat in films such as The Scarlet Pimpernel (Harold Young, UK, 1934) and Pygmalion (Anthony Asquith, Leslie Howard, UK, 1938), or as tragic hero in productions like Of Human Bondage ( John Cromwell, USA, 1934) and Gone with the Wind (Victor Fleming [George Cukor], USA, 1939). As a symbol of refinement and gentlemanliness, Howard's character spoke to the social instability British audiences were experiencing due to political crisis and war. It was a time when conceptions of \"Englishness\" were being challenged-not least because of the influx of Jewish migrants and refugees escaping persecution in Europe who created a space of difference in British society. Howard, as Estel Eforgan's meticulously researched biography, Leslie Howard: The Lost Actor, reveals, was nothing if not aware of the social and political influences of his dramatic persona.Eforgan's biography is a compelling and thorough overview of Howard's life and career within the context of social and political upheaval, migration, and war. As such it makes an important contribution to the fields of media and cultural studies, as well as Jewish studies, revealing the influential role that actors and filmmakers played in the political arena. As Eforgan uncovers, there was more to Howard's persona as \"ideal Englishman\" than most people consider. Leslie Howard Steiner, whose father was a Hungarian Jew and whose mother's origins were also Jewish (from Russia and East Prussia), was intensely committed to political activism and anti-Nazi efforts in the years leading up to World War II. And while the biography covers much more than that-including Howard's career on the English stage in the 1920s and the launch of his stardom in New York and Hollywood-Eforgan makes clear that by the mid-1930s Howard was making career and life choices that were influenced by politics. More specifically, he began to use his fame as a tool to resist Hitler's rise to power and the persecution of Jews in Europe.Eforgan's sympathy for her subject will strike a chord with readers and personalize the exhaustive amount of detail on Howard's life. The chapters that trace Howard's development as an actor, screenwriter, producer, director, and public intellectual from the 1920s to the 1940s are filled with lively anecdotes as well as with valuable comments on the social and cultural milieu. Some of the most entertaining points in the biography include Eforgan's musings on Howard's stage mishaps and love affairs, and the colorful cha","PeriodicalId":40351,"journal":{"name":"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal","volume":"36 1","pages":"207 - 210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88518826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-10-01DOI: 10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.2.0211
Slava Greenberg
On Niv's Look Back into the Future: The Israeli Cinema and the 1982 Lebanon War Israeli Cinema Faces the Specter of the Lebanon War Blindfolded Look Back into the Future: The Israeli Cinema and the 1982 Lebanon War. By Kobi Niv. Tel Aviv: New World Publishing (Hotzaat Olam Hadash), 2014. 158 pp., ISBN 978-965-920496-0 (pb), Israel 53 NIS [Hebrew].The specter of the First Lebanon War and the eighteen-year occupation of southern Lebanon still haunts Israeli society. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the Israeli film industry. Kobi Niv's Look Back into the Future: The Israeli Cinema and the 1982 Lebanon War is an exploration of three Israeli feature films-Beaufort ( Joseph Cedar, 2007), Waltz with Bashir (Ari Folman, 2008), and Lebanon (Shmuel Maoz, 2009)-that won much international acclaim (including several major prizes) as innovative investigations into the horrors and lingering scars of that war. Niv tries to understand the attraction these films may have for audiences in Israel and overseas, but mainly what they may reveal about Israeli society today.Lebanon takes place during the first day of the war ( June 6, 1982), as it is seen by an Israeli tank crew through the canon periscope. Waltz with Bashir is an animated documentary following the middle-aged director in his journey to resurrect suppressed memories of his involvement in combat during the massacre in the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps (September 16-18, 1982). Beaufort takes place eighteen years later, during the last days of the Israeli occupation in Lebanon (2000). It is the story of soldiers in the "last Israeli stronghold," the ancient crusader fortress of Beaufort.Because he is interested in the films' success in the stories they tell, and in the social meanings they hold as contemporary artifacts, Niv offers a dual perspective: cinematic and sociopolitical. At the cinematic level, Niv finds that, despite differences in genre and aesthetics, all three films share a view of the Israeli soldier as an innocent victim trapped in a war he is unable to make sense of, and he is consequently neither accountable nor responsible for his actions. Drawing from political analysis and historical data, Niv demonstrates that the films rewrite history so as to minimize Israel's active role in it, in particular Israeli involvement in the war crimes at Sabra and Shatila. Niv provides ample historical evidence of Israel's active involvement-at all levels of military and governmental hierarchy-in the Lebanese war, yet the films deny it. In particular Waltz with Bashir and Lebanon, which both acknowledge the connection between the Israeli military and the Christian Lebanese Phalangists, attempt to detach their protagonists from any real-time knowledge of events or retrospective responsibility for them. This is especially reprehensible to Niv, as the films were produced nearly twenty years after the events took place, and their directors clearly have this information today.The story of Beaufort is
{"title":"On Niv’s Look Back into the Future: The Israeli Cinema and the 1982 Lebanon War: Israeli Cinema Faces the Specter of the Lebanon War Blindfolded","authors":"Slava Greenberg","doi":"10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.2.0211","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.2.0211","url":null,"abstract":"On Niv's Look Back into the Future: The Israeli Cinema and the 1982 Lebanon War Israeli Cinema Faces the Specter of the Lebanon War Blindfolded Look Back into the Future: The Israeli Cinema and the 1982 Lebanon War. By Kobi Niv. Tel Aviv: New World Publishing (Hotzaat Olam Hadash), 2014. 158 pp., ISBN 978-965-920496-0 (pb), Israel 53 NIS [Hebrew].The specter of the First Lebanon War and the eighteen-year occupation of southern Lebanon still haunts Israeli society. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the Israeli film industry. Kobi Niv's Look Back into the Future: The Israeli Cinema and the 1982 Lebanon War is an exploration of three Israeli feature films-Beaufort ( Joseph Cedar, 2007), Waltz with Bashir (Ari Folman, 2008), and Lebanon (Shmuel Maoz, 2009)-that won much international acclaim (including several major prizes) as innovative investigations into the horrors and lingering scars of that war. Niv tries to understand the attraction these films may have for audiences in Israel and overseas, but mainly what they may reveal about Israeli society today.Lebanon takes place during the first day of the war ( June 6, 1982), as it is seen by an Israeli tank crew through the canon periscope. Waltz with Bashir is an animated documentary following the middle-aged director in his journey to resurrect suppressed memories of his involvement in combat during the massacre in the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps (September 16-18, 1982). Beaufort takes place eighteen years later, during the last days of the Israeli occupation in Lebanon (2000). It is the story of soldiers in the \"last Israeli stronghold,\" the ancient crusader fortress of Beaufort.Because he is interested in the films' success in the stories they tell, and in the social meanings they hold as contemporary artifacts, Niv offers a dual perspective: cinematic and sociopolitical. At the cinematic level, Niv finds that, despite differences in genre and aesthetics, all three films share a view of the Israeli soldier as an innocent victim trapped in a war he is unable to make sense of, and he is consequently neither accountable nor responsible for his actions. Drawing from political analysis and historical data, Niv demonstrates that the films rewrite history so as to minimize Israel's active role in it, in particular Israeli involvement in the war crimes at Sabra and Shatila. Niv provides ample historical evidence of Israel's active involvement-at all levels of military and governmental hierarchy-in the Lebanese war, yet the films deny it. In particular Waltz with Bashir and Lebanon, which both acknowledge the connection between the Israeli military and the Christian Lebanese Phalangists, attempt to detach their protagonists from any real-time knowledge of events or retrospective responsibility for them. This is especially reprehensible to Niv, as the films were produced nearly twenty years after the events took place, and their directors clearly have this information today.The story of Beaufort is ","PeriodicalId":40351,"journal":{"name":"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"211 - 213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84284387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-10-01DOI: 10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.2.0186
Searle Kochberg
End of Project Event, JW3 (Jewish Community Centre, London, UK), November 24, 2015. Funded by the UK Arts and Humanities Research CouncilIn The Savage Mind1 Claude Levi-Strauss explains how mythological thought and rites are continuously broken down and rebuilt again through new constructions of already existing sets of events, and how rituals serve to bring unity to previously separate groups. This makes ritual particularly fertile ground for bricolage-Levi- Strauss's term for tinkering: the (re)working of found materials to piece together new structures, identities, and rituals.On November 24, 2015, at London's JW3-the Jewish Community Centre-a yearlong Jewish Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning, and Intersex (LGBTQI) research project culminated in a bricolage "happening" of ritual objects, photographs, storytelling, rabbinical dialogues on "queering religion," and an evening screening of the project's five LGBTQI Jewish ritual films-all part of the Ritual Reconstructed/Connected Communities project, funded by the UK Arts and Humanities Research Council. In its efforts Ritual Reconstructed has in no small way been facilitated by Liberal Judaism, which in the UK has led the way on LGBTQI inclusivity by being responsive to social need and by being "practical in so many ways," to quote Rabbi Janet Darley.2As a filmmaker, I have had the great pleasure in the last four years of working with the LGBTQI Jewish community on three big projects: my film-based PhD, My Jewish London; the Rainbow Jews project (funded by the UK National Lottery Heritage Fund); and now the Ritual Reconstructed project. What has struck me from the beginning is the way this community has-since the 1970s-indeed "tinkered" to create its own symbols and ritual, all to bring a sense of togetherness and to "pump up individuals with emotional energy."3 The philosophy behind the LGBTQI ritual activities of the Ritual Reconstructed project is essentially Reconstructionist, based on the ideas of Mordecai Kaplan.4 It is an approach to Jewish custom and belief that aims toward communal decision-making.One of the films screened at JW3 was Pride Seder,5 a record of the 2015 eveof- London Pride Seder at South London Liberal Synagogue. An orange takes center stage at this Pride ritual, along with other "foreign" queer objects to be tinkered with at this LGBTQI bricolage event: a drag queen's high-heel shoe, a brick, foreign "fruits," rainbow-colored ribbons. The orange on the seder plate is a key ritual motif for many LGBTQI Jews. Indeed, the Ritual Reconstructed logotype incorporates this image. Where does the orange motif come from? As Rabbi Janet Burden has commented on www.ritualreconstructed.com, "Some years ago, a group of students at Oberlin College wished to make a statement about Jewish inclusiveness. . . . Either they, or a Jewish feminist called Susannah Heschel, had the idea of using an orange to symbolize inclusivity: It was made up of many segments, but it for
{"title":"Ritual Reconstructed Project, 2014–2015","authors":"Searle Kochberg","doi":"10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.2.0186","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.2.0186","url":null,"abstract":"End of Project Event, JW3 (Jewish Community Centre, London, UK), November 24, 2015. Funded by the UK Arts and Humanities Research CouncilIn The Savage Mind1 Claude Levi-Strauss explains how mythological thought and rites are continuously broken down and rebuilt again through new constructions of already existing sets of events, and how rituals serve to bring unity to previously separate groups. This makes ritual particularly fertile ground for bricolage-Levi- Strauss's term for tinkering: the (re)working of found materials to piece together new structures, identities, and rituals.On November 24, 2015, at London's JW3-the Jewish Community Centre-a yearlong Jewish Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning, and Intersex (LGBTQI) research project culminated in a bricolage \"happening\" of ritual objects, photographs, storytelling, rabbinical dialogues on \"queering religion,\" and an evening screening of the project's five LGBTQI Jewish ritual films-all part of the Ritual Reconstructed/Connected Communities project, funded by the UK Arts and Humanities Research Council. In its efforts Ritual Reconstructed has in no small way been facilitated by Liberal Judaism, which in the UK has led the way on LGBTQI inclusivity by being responsive to social need and by being \"practical in so many ways,\" to quote Rabbi Janet Darley.2As a filmmaker, I have had the great pleasure in the last four years of working with the LGBTQI Jewish community on three big projects: my film-based PhD, My Jewish London; the Rainbow Jews project (funded by the UK National Lottery Heritage Fund); and now the Ritual Reconstructed project. What has struck me from the beginning is the way this community has-since the 1970s-indeed \"tinkered\" to create its own symbols and ritual, all to bring a sense of togetherness and to \"pump up individuals with emotional energy.\"3 The philosophy behind the LGBTQI ritual activities of the Ritual Reconstructed project is essentially Reconstructionist, based on the ideas of Mordecai Kaplan.4 It is an approach to Jewish custom and belief that aims toward communal decision-making.One of the films screened at JW3 was Pride Seder,5 a record of the 2015 eveof- London Pride Seder at South London Liberal Synagogue. An orange takes center stage at this Pride ritual, along with other \"foreign\" queer objects to be tinkered with at this LGBTQI bricolage event: a drag queen's high-heel shoe, a brick, foreign \"fruits,\" rainbow-colored ribbons. The orange on the seder plate is a key ritual motif for many LGBTQI Jews. Indeed, the Ritual Reconstructed logotype incorporates this image. Where does the orange motif come from? As Rabbi Janet Burden has commented on www.ritualreconstructed.com, \"Some years ago, a group of students at Oberlin College wished to make a statement about Jewish inclusiveness. . . . Either they, or a Jewish feminist called Susannah Heschel, had the idea of using an orange to symbolize inclusivity: It was made up of many segments, but it for","PeriodicalId":40351,"journal":{"name":"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"186 - 191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81748077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-10-01DOI: 10.13110/jewifilmnewmedi.4.2.0196
Gil Toffell
samuel-613. Directed by Billy Lumby. 2015. UK: Commissioned by Dazed and Confused Magazine. Available online at www.youtube.com/watch?v=oT1BLg9FtNw. 16 minutes.By chance, my first viewing of samuel-6 13 occurred at the end of May 2015-the same week the "Hasidic driving ban" story broke as headline news in the UK media. Apparently provoked by the minatory notion of the itinerant independent woman, leaders of the Belz sect issued a letter requesting that mothers desist from driving their children to communal schools in the Haredi heartlands of Stamford Hill in North London, stating that women drivers were in danger of breaching "traditional rules of modesty."1 With the request widely reported as analogous to the state-imposed Wahhabism of Saudi Arabia, and declared to be in contravention of equal rights legislation by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, the Belzer authorities were forced to publicly back down, in a move that leftthe sect appearing decidedly vulnerable to the encroachments of modernity. That the temptations of twenty-first-century metropolitan London might infiltrate Haredi citadels of isolation is the central conceit behind samuel-613. Significantly, the depiction of the havoc such an event might wreak seems symptomatic of trends in thinking about cultural identity in the current moment.With a running time just under sixteen minutes, samuel-613 quickly gets to the point: Shmilu has a problem-he is horny. For most twenty-something Londoners, developing a strategy to tackle such a situation is relatively straightforward; Shmilu, however, is a Haredi Jew living in Stamford Hill. As such his contact with women outside the family is restricted to porn magazines smuggled into his bedroom and anonymously flirting online. Angry and frustrated, he constantly challenges his father's authority, a struggle that culminates in his scandalous wrecking of a Shabbos dinner. Shorn of beard and payot, he strikes out on his own, moving into a high-rise flat where he goes about the work of remaking himself-gorging on bacon and beer. However, following a disastrous date with "Jezebel"-his online crush-Shmilu realizes that entry into the goyishe world demands more than purchasing a baseball cap. Cut adrift, he returns to Jewish ritual and dreams about bridging an impossible cultural gap by fantasizing a strictly Orthodox marriage between himself and Jezebel. As Shmuli becomes strung out on pharmaceuticals and descends into derangement, the film ends with the arrival of a hallucinatory flock of parrots, a perverse echo of a joke told by his grandfather at the fateful Shabbos supper a few weeks earlier.While Haredi life has received only minimal attention in mainstream cinema, of those films that have appeared, the narrative of the individual who has strayed "offthe derech" is something of a common theme. The derech-Hebrew for path-is the life of devotion to the 613 mitzvot: biblical commandments that range from dietary laws to the injunction that me
塞缪尔- 613。比利·伦比导演,2015年。英国:受Dazed and Confused杂志委托。可在www.youtube.com/watch?v=oT1BLg9FtNw上获得。16分钟。巧合的是,我第一次看《撒母耳-6 - 13》是在2015年5月底,就在同一周,“哈西德派禁止驾驶”的故事成为英国媒体的头条新闻。贝尔兹教派的领袖们显然是被流动的独立女性的威胁性观念激怒了,他们发表了一封信,要求母亲们不要再开车送孩子去位于伦敦北部斯坦福德山的哈瑞迪中心地带的公共学校,称女司机有违反“传统端庄规则”的危险。由于这一要求被广泛报道为类似于沙特阿拉伯国家强加的瓦哈比主义,并被宣布违反了平等与人权委员会(Equality and Human rights Commission)制定的平等权利立法,贝尔泽当局被迫公开让步,此举使该教派在现代性的侵蚀下显得明显脆弱。21世纪伦敦大都市的诱惑可能会渗透到哈雷迪教派与世隔绝的堡垒中,这是《撒母耳613》背后的核心自负。值得注意的是,对此类事件可能造成的破坏的描述似乎是当前思考文化身份的趋势的征兆。在不到16分钟的时间里,塞缪尔-613很快就到了重点:什米卢有一个问题——他很好色。对于大多数20多岁的伦敦人来说,制定应对这种情况的策略相对简单;然而,Shmilu是一个住在斯坦福德山的正统派犹太人。因此,他与家庭以外的女性的接触仅限于偷运到他卧室的色情杂志和匿名在网上调情。愤怒和沮丧的他不断挑战父亲的权威,这场斗争在他破坏安息日晚宴的丑闻中达到高潮。他剃掉了胡子和payot,开始了自己的生活,搬进了一栋高层公寓,在那里他狼吞虎咽地吃着培根和啤酒,开始重塑自己。然而,在与“耶洗别”——他在网上喜欢的人——进行了一次灾难性的约会之后,什米卢意识到,进入非犹太世界需要的不仅仅是买一顶棒球帽。他被切断了联系,回到了犹太仪式,梦想着通过幻想自己和耶洗别之间严格的正统婚姻来弥合不可能的文化鸿沟。随着什穆里逐渐沉迷于药物并陷入精神错乱,影片以一群出现幻觉的鹦鹉结束,这是他祖父在几周前宿命的安息日晚餐上讲的一个笑话的反常呼应。虽然正统派的生活在主流电影中只受到很少的关注,但在那些已经出现的电影中,对“偏离极端”的个人的叙述是一个共同的主题。derech——希伯来语中“道路”的意思——是献身于613条诫命(mitzvot)的生活:从饮食律法到男人不能剃掉头两侧头发的禁令,圣经戒律的范围很广。亚当·瓦尔迪的《门迪:信仰问题》(美国,2003年)和托尼·克拉维茨的《犹太男孩》(澳大利亚,2005年)是这一趋势相对较新的例子;还有杰里米·卡根的《天选之子》(美国,1981年),改编自查伊姆·波托克的畅销书,由马克西米兰·舍尔和罗德·斯泰格主演。还有,在有声电影出现之初,艾尔·乔尔森在《爵士歌手》中抛弃了正统信仰(艾伦·克罗斯兰,美国,1927年)。此外,犹太人和非犹太人世界并列的比喻可以追溯到意第绪语戏剧和20世纪20年代好莱坞的“贫民窟电影”。例如,在爱德华·斯洛曼1925年的《他的人民》(美国)中,一位虔诚的下东区书商对儿子的拳击事业和与当地爱尔兰女孩的恋情感到绝望。对于有兴趣探索社会中心和边缘边界之间的泄漏的电影制作人来说,犹太人长期以来一直是一个有吸引力的工具。考虑到这一血统,批评《撒母耳记》613章有些陈腐似乎并不过分。...
{"title":"On Lumby’s samuel-613","authors":"Gil Toffell","doi":"10.13110/jewifilmnewmedi.4.2.0196","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13110/jewifilmnewmedi.4.2.0196","url":null,"abstract":"samuel-613. Directed by Billy Lumby. 2015. UK: Commissioned by Dazed and Confused Magazine. Available online at www.youtube.com/watch?v=oT1BLg9FtNw. 16 minutes.By chance, my first viewing of samuel-6 13 occurred at the end of May 2015-the same week the \"Hasidic driving ban\" story broke as headline news in the UK media. Apparently provoked by the minatory notion of the itinerant independent woman, leaders of the Belz sect issued a letter requesting that mothers desist from driving their children to communal schools in the Haredi heartlands of Stamford Hill in North London, stating that women drivers were in danger of breaching \"traditional rules of modesty.\"1 With the request widely reported as analogous to the state-imposed Wahhabism of Saudi Arabia, and declared to be in contravention of equal rights legislation by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, the Belzer authorities were forced to publicly back down, in a move that leftthe sect appearing decidedly vulnerable to the encroachments of modernity. That the temptations of twenty-first-century metropolitan London might infiltrate Haredi citadels of isolation is the central conceit behind samuel-613. Significantly, the depiction of the havoc such an event might wreak seems symptomatic of trends in thinking about cultural identity in the current moment.With a running time just under sixteen minutes, samuel-613 quickly gets to the point: Shmilu has a problem-he is horny. For most twenty-something Londoners, developing a strategy to tackle such a situation is relatively straightforward; Shmilu, however, is a Haredi Jew living in Stamford Hill. As such his contact with women outside the family is restricted to porn magazines smuggled into his bedroom and anonymously flirting online. Angry and frustrated, he constantly challenges his father's authority, a struggle that culminates in his scandalous wrecking of a Shabbos dinner. Shorn of beard and payot, he strikes out on his own, moving into a high-rise flat where he goes about the work of remaking himself-gorging on bacon and beer. However, following a disastrous date with \"Jezebel\"-his online crush-Shmilu realizes that entry into the goyishe world demands more than purchasing a baseball cap. Cut adrift, he returns to Jewish ritual and dreams about bridging an impossible cultural gap by fantasizing a strictly Orthodox marriage between himself and Jezebel. As Shmuli becomes strung out on pharmaceuticals and descends into derangement, the film ends with the arrival of a hallucinatory flock of parrots, a perverse echo of a joke told by his grandfather at the fateful Shabbos supper a few weeks earlier.While Haredi life has received only minimal attention in mainstream cinema, of those films that have appeared, the narrative of the individual who has strayed \"offthe derech\" is something of a common theme. The derech-Hebrew for path-is the life of devotion to the 613 mitzvot: biblical commandments that range from dietary laws to the injunction that me","PeriodicalId":40351,"journal":{"name":"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal","volume":"95 1","pages":"196 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76968139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-10-01DOI: 10.13110/jewifilmnewmedi.4.2.0192
S. Whitfield
On Sutak's Cinema Judaica: The War Years, 19 39-1949 Cinema Judaica: The War Years, 1939-1949. By Ken Sutak. New York: Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion Museum/CCAR Press, 2012. 106 pp., ISBN 978-1-884300-25-7 (ebook). US $9.99.Perhaps no decade in modern Jewish history-perhaps no decade since the destruction of the Second Temple-has been so packed with significance as the ten years that began in 1939. The horrifically unimaginable was followed by the thrillingly unpredicted. No catastrophe like the Holocaust can be said to have been redeemed. But the birth of a Jewish state, however much historians of the Yishuv can trace the achievement of sovereignty to forces independent of the shock of the Final Solution, cannot in retrospect be removed from the same cataclysmic decade as the torment of the refugee crisis, the plight of Diasporic Jewry beleaguered by anti-Semitism hardly limited to the distinctive terror of the Third Reich, the impact of totalitarianism, and the momentum of decolonization and nationalism.How did such extraordinary historical experiences register in the past century's supreme medium of mass communication? One answer is reflected in movie poster exhibits that were mounted in the spring of 2007 and then again in the spring of 2008 at the Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion Museum in New York City. This seductive, lovingly designed, and informative volume stems from those exhibits, which Ken Sutak very ably produced. Cinema Judaica constitutes an impressive feat of archeology, of an era that begins with a feature film like Warner Bros.' Confessions of a Nazi Spy (Anatole Litvak, USA, 1939), starring Edward G. Robinson, and ends with a quartet of obscure movies set during Israel's fight for independence.The phrase that serves as the title of this book, Sutak writes, may have originated in Los Angeles, "to promote revival screenings of Jewish-themed films" (99), and to attract audiences to concerts where the film scores by Jewish composers were performed. The author gives no exact dates, however. Nor is his own definition of a "Jewish-themed" movie unduly rigid. The Stranger (Orson Welles, USA, 1946), for example, includes documentary footage of concentration camps. But none of the major characters (portrayed by Orson Welles, who also directed the film, Loretta Young, and the ubiquitous Edward G. Robinson) is Jewish; and the Nazis were not too finicky about whom they chose to imprison and torture in the camps. What makes The Stranger Jewish is therefore dubious. Cinema Judaica even includes a Disney cartoon, Education for Death (Clyde Geronimi, USA, 1943). Or take The House I Live In (Mervyn LeRoy, USA, 1945). Perhaps no nine-minute short in the history of Hollywood has enjoyed more acclaim. This movie won a special Academy Award for "Tolerance Short Subject," as well as a Golden Globe Award for "Best Film for Promoting International Good Will." These prizes, in the immediate aftermath of the Final So
论苏塔克的《犹太电影:战争年代》1939-1949肯·苏塔克著。纽约:希伯来联合学院-犹太宗教学院博物馆/CCAR出版社,2012。106页,ISBN 978-1-884300-25-7(电子书)。9.99美元。也许在现代犹太历史上没有一个十年——也许自第二圣殿被毁以来没有一个十年——像1939年开始的十年那样充满意义。可怕的难以想象的事情之后是令人激动的无法预测的事情。没有像大屠杀这样的灾难可以说是得到了救赎。但是,一个犹太国家的诞生,无论历史学家如何将主权的实现追溯到独立于“最终解决方案”冲击之外的力量,回顾起来都不能从同一个灾难性的十年中消失,因为难民危机的折磨,被反犹主义围困的散居犹太人的困境几乎不限于第三帝国特有的恐怖,极权主义的影响,以及非殖民化和民族主义的势头。这些非凡的历史经历是如何记录在上个世纪大众传播的最高媒介上的?一个答案反映在2007年春天和2008年春天分别在纽约市希伯来联合大学犹太宗教学院博物馆展出的电影海报展览上。这个诱人的,可爱的设计,和信息的卷源于这些展品,肯苏塔克非常巧妙地制作。《犹太电影》是一项令人印象深刻的考古壮举,也是一个时代的开端,它始于一部像华纳兄弟的《纳粹间谍的自述》(阿纳托尔·利特瓦克,美国,1939年)这样的故事片,由爱德华·g·罗宾逊主演,以以色列争取独立的战争为背景,以四部鲜为人知的电影结束。苏塔克写道,作为这本书标题的短语可能起源于洛杉矶,“促进犹太主题电影的复兴放映”(99),并吸引观众参加音乐会,在音乐会中演奏犹太作曲家的电影配乐。然而,作者没有给出确切的日期。他自己对“犹太主题”电影的定义也并非过于死板。例如,《陌生人》(Orson Welles, USA, 1946)就包含了集中营的纪录片镜头。但影片中的主要角色(由奥森·威尔斯(Orson Welles)饰演,他也是本片的导演洛丽塔·杨(Loretta Young)和无处不在的爱德华·g·罗宾逊(Edward G. Robinson)饰演)都不是犹太人;而且纳粹对他们选择在集中营里监禁和折磨的人并不太挑剔。因此,是什么使《陌生人》成为犹太人是值得怀疑的。犹太电影院甚至包括迪斯尼动画片《死亡教育》(克莱德·格罗尼米,美国,1943年)。或者以《我住的房子》(Mervyn LeRoy,美国,1945)为例。也许在好莱坞的历史上,没有哪部九分钟的短片能获得如此多的好评。该片获得了奥斯卡特别奖“宽容短片”和金球奖“促进国际善意最佳影片”。这些奖项是在《最终解决方案》之后立即颁发的,标志着时代精神的转变。但在电影中,弗兰克·辛纳屈保护的孩子却因为不同的“宗教”而受到欺负;没有明确提到它是犹太教。在这十年里,偏见被普遍认为是不可分割的,好像反犹太主义和种族主义是可以互换的,当普遍主义的价值观通常被认为是陷入困境的人民的最佳避难所时,谨慎起见,不要过于具体。《我住的房子》由阿尔伯特·马尔茨编剧,刘易斯·艾伦(Abel Meerepol的笔名)也参与了主打歌的创作。在RKO的短片发布两年后,马尔茨作为好莱坞十人组的一员被传唤到众议院非美活动委员会作证。在辛纳屈推出这首呼吁多元化的音乐八年后,朱利叶斯和埃塞尔·罗森伯格将被电刑;米列波尔会收养他们的孤儿。...
{"title":"On Sutak’s Cinema Judaica: The War Years, 1939–1949","authors":"S. Whitfield","doi":"10.13110/jewifilmnewmedi.4.2.0192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13110/jewifilmnewmedi.4.2.0192","url":null,"abstract":"On Sutak's Cinema Judaica: The War Years, 19 39-1949 Cinema Judaica: The War Years, 1939-1949. By Ken Sutak. New York: Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion Museum/CCAR Press, 2012. 106 pp., ISBN 978-1-884300-25-7 (ebook). US $9.99.Perhaps no decade in modern Jewish history-perhaps no decade since the destruction of the Second Temple-has been so packed with significance as the ten years that began in 1939. The horrifically unimaginable was followed by the thrillingly unpredicted. No catastrophe like the Holocaust can be said to have been redeemed. But the birth of a Jewish state, however much historians of the Yishuv can trace the achievement of sovereignty to forces independent of the shock of the Final Solution, cannot in retrospect be removed from the same cataclysmic decade as the torment of the refugee crisis, the plight of Diasporic Jewry beleaguered by anti-Semitism hardly limited to the distinctive terror of the Third Reich, the impact of totalitarianism, and the momentum of decolonization and nationalism.How did such extraordinary historical experiences register in the past century's supreme medium of mass communication? One answer is reflected in movie poster exhibits that were mounted in the spring of 2007 and then again in the spring of 2008 at the Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion Museum in New York City. This seductive, lovingly designed, and informative volume stems from those exhibits, which Ken Sutak very ably produced. Cinema Judaica constitutes an impressive feat of archeology, of an era that begins with a feature film like Warner Bros.' Confessions of a Nazi Spy (Anatole Litvak, USA, 1939), starring Edward G. Robinson, and ends with a quartet of obscure movies set during Israel's fight for independence.The phrase that serves as the title of this book, Sutak writes, may have originated in Los Angeles, \"to promote revival screenings of Jewish-themed films\" (99), and to attract audiences to concerts where the film scores by Jewish composers were performed. The author gives no exact dates, however. Nor is his own definition of a \"Jewish-themed\" movie unduly rigid. The Stranger (Orson Welles, USA, 1946), for example, includes documentary footage of concentration camps. But none of the major characters (portrayed by Orson Welles, who also directed the film, Loretta Young, and the ubiquitous Edward G. Robinson) is Jewish; and the Nazis were not too finicky about whom they chose to imprison and torture in the camps. What makes The Stranger Jewish is therefore dubious. Cinema Judaica even includes a Disney cartoon, Education for Death (Clyde Geronimi, USA, 1943). Or take The House I Live In (Mervyn LeRoy, USA, 1945). Perhaps no nine-minute short in the history of Hollywood has enjoyed more acclaim. This movie won a special Academy Award for \"Tolerance Short Subject,\" as well as a Golden Globe Award for \"Best Film for Promoting International Good Will.\" These prizes, in the immediate aftermath of the Final So","PeriodicalId":40351,"journal":{"name":"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal","volume":"66 1","pages":"192 - 195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83704316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-03-31DOI: 10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.1.0025
Yael Munk
This article engages with one of the most successful contemporary Israeli documentaries, Arnon Goldfinger’s The Flat (Israel, 2011). Its success, both in Israel and worldwide, has been attributed to the unusual relationship it reveals: the sustained friendship between the Tuchlers, a Jewish-Israeli couple of German origin who were the director’s grandparents, and a German couple, of whom the husband was none other than the notorious Nazi officer Leopold von Mildenstein (1902–1968). Using a first-person narration, Israeli director Goldfinger sets out to investigate this weird friendship and discovers, completely by accident, what Susan Sontag termed “the pain of others.” He also comes to recognize himself as a second (or maybe third) generation survivor of the Holocaust: that he is the grandson of Holocaust survivors. These two discoveries shake the very foundations of his Israeli identity, since the new Israeli culture to which Goldfinger belongs has invested countless efforts in concealing the vulnerability, physical weakness, and eventual flawed masculinity of the “Old Jew.” These two narrative lines intersect through the filmmaker’s adoption of one of the most fascinating cinematic genres, film noir—an unprecedented choice in Israeli documentary, which, as this article will demonstrate, was above all an ethical choice.
{"title":"Arnon Goldfinger’s The Flat: Holocaust Memory, Film Noir, and the Pain of Others","authors":"Yael Munk","doi":"10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.1.0025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.1.0025","url":null,"abstract":"This article engages with one of the most successful contemporary Israeli documentaries, Arnon Goldfinger’s The Flat (Israel, 2011). Its success, both in Israel and worldwide, has been attributed to the unusual relationship it reveals: the sustained friendship between the Tuchlers, a Jewish-Israeli couple of German origin who were the director’s grandparents, and a German couple, of whom the husband was none other than the notorious Nazi officer Leopold von Mildenstein (1902–1968). Using a first-person narration, Israeli director Goldfinger sets out to investigate this weird friendship and discovers, completely by accident, what Susan Sontag termed “the pain of others.” He also comes to recognize himself as a second (or maybe third) generation survivor of the Holocaust: that he is the grandson of Holocaust survivors. These two discoveries shake the very foundations of his Israeli identity, since the new Israeli culture to which Goldfinger belongs has invested countless efforts in concealing the vulnerability, physical weakness, and eventual flawed masculinity of the “Old Jew.” These two narrative lines intersect through the filmmaker’s adoption of one of the most fascinating cinematic genres, film noir—an unprecedented choice in Israeli documentary, which, as this article will demonstrate, was above all an ethical choice.","PeriodicalId":40351,"journal":{"name":"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal","volume":"73 1","pages":"25 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83734324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-03-31DOI: 10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.1.0090
Ronen Gil
The discussion proposed in this article on the Israeli television series Haborer (The Arbitrator, 2007–2014) focuses on the blending of three major genres that characterize and define it: the “masculine” American gangster film, the “feminine” soap opera, and the popular Israeli bourekas movie.I claim that the hybridization of these diverse and contradictory genres allows the series to propose a new and complex representation of Mizrahi masculinity. While the bourekas genre depicted Ashkenazi masculinity as the polar opposite of Mizrahi masculinity, the Mizrahi masculinity offered in Haborer adopts and contains bourekas Ashkenazi masculinity.
{"title":"Adapting Masculinities: Israeli and American Genres Redefining Mizrahi Masculinity in the TV Series Haborer","authors":"Ronen Gil","doi":"10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.1.0090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.1.0090","url":null,"abstract":"The discussion proposed in this article on the Israeli television series Haborer (The Arbitrator, 2007–2014) focuses on the blending of three major genres that characterize and define it: the “masculine” American gangster film, the “feminine” soap opera, and the popular Israeli bourekas movie.I claim that the hybridization of these diverse and contradictory genres allows the series to propose a new and complex representation of Mizrahi masculinity. While the bourekas genre depicted Ashkenazi masculinity as the polar opposite of Mizrahi masculinity, the Mizrahi masculinity offered in Haborer adopts and contains bourekas Ashkenazi masculinity.","PeriodicalId":40351,"journal":{"name":"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"108 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88212618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-03-31DOI: 10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.1.0001
Yaron Peleg, Yaron Yvonne Kozlovsky-Golan
Th is issue of Jewish Film & New Media continues the series on Israeli media studies, which began last year with an issue on the treatment of Jewish religious themes in Israeli fi lms and television programs. Th ese special issues are based on small scholars’ conferences usually held once a year at various academic institutions as part of a new scholarly framework for the exploration of Jewish and Israeli media. Th e current issue is dedicated to aspects of genre in Israeli media. Generic boundaries of visual arts have expanded greatly in the last decade or so with the increasing infl uence of the Internet as both a ubiquitous delivery platform as well as a medium in and of itself. In Israel’s multifaceted society these trends have a special restonance and are manifest in various genres, including Mizrahi productions, works that examine religious versus secular tensions, and even those categorized as more “fl uff y” genres, such as horror and other varieties. Th ese works refl ect the many faces of Israeli society and express its various contours. Th e reincarnation of television shows as Internet programs delivered on demand is one of the most obvious examples of this development. In this rapidly evolving world that combines art and commerce in ever-more complex ways, Israeli visual culture has become one of the most dynamic and innovative grounds for such creative activity. Th is is not only valid for so-called television programs, or Internet TV shows, which are an increasingly international trend. It is also true of cinema, which is infl uenced by these trends in various ways as well. Th is issue, which originated at a dedicated conference held at Haifa University in August
{"title":"Genres in Jewish and Israeli Cinema","authors":"Yaron Peleg, Yaron Yvonne Kozlovsky-Golan","doi":"10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.1.0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.1.0001","url":null,"abstract":"Th is issue of Jewish Film & New Media continues the series on Israeli media studies, which began last year with an issue on the treatment of Jewish religious themes in Israeli fi lms and television programs. Th ese special issues are based on small scholars’ conferences usually held once a year at various academic institutions as part of a new scholarly framework for the exploration of Jewish and Israeli media. Th e current issue is dedicated to aspects of genre in Israeli media. Generic boundaries of visual arts have expanded greatly in the last decade or so with the increasing infl uence of the Internet as both a ubiquitous delivery platform as well as a medium in and of itself. In Israel’s multifaceted society these trends have a special restonance and are manifest in various genres, including Mizrahi productions, works that examine religious versus secular tensions, and even those categorized as more “fl uff y” genres, such as horror and other varieties. Th ese works refl ect the many faces of Israeli society and express its various contours. Th e reincarnation of television shows as Internet programs delivered on demand is one of the most obvious examples of this development. In this rapidly evolving world that combines art and commerce in ever-more complex ways, Israeli visual culture has become one of the most dynamic and innovative grounds for such creative activity. Th is is not only valid for so-called television programs, or Internet TV shows, which are an increasingly international trend. It is also true of cinema, which is infl uenced by these trends in various ways as well. Th is issue, which originated at a dedicated conference held at Haifa University in August","PeriodicalId":40351,"journal":{"name":"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"1 - 2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89640611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-03-31DOI: 10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.1.0109
L. Weinberg
Looking at the intersections between Israeli art history and Israeli television series, as well as their recent increased visibility at the international level, this essay seeks to understand what makes contemporary Israeli art and media works accessible to an international audience, and how this recent success may reflect changes in Israeli and Jewish constructions of identity. Furthermore, it attempts to address the crisis of Jewish-Israeli identity as it is portrayed on Israeli television screens and to ask what can be learned about it from the perspective of Israeli art history.
{"title":"DIY: How to (Not So) Safely Dismantle the Bomb of On-Screen Jewish-Israeli Identity: The Synergies with Art and Television in the Representation of Jewish-Israeli Identity and What Can Be Learned from Them","authors":"L. Weinberg","doi":"10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.1.0109","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.4.1.0109","url":null,"abstract":"Looking at the intersections between Israeli art history and Israeli television series, as well as their recent increased visibility at the international level, this essay seeks to understand what makes contemporary Israeli art and media works accessible to an international audience, and how this recent success may reflect changes in Israeli and Jewish constructions of identity. Furthermore, it attempts to address the crisis of Jewish-Israeli identity as it is portrayed on Israeli television screens and to ask what can be learned about it from the perspective of Israeli art history.","PeriodicalId":40351,"journal":{"name":"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"109 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80770489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}