首页 > 最新文献

Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine最新文献

英文 中文
PIDHIRTSI GROUP OF SITES: CURRENT STATE AND PROSPECTS OF THE FUTURE RESEARCHES Pidhirtsi群遗址:研究现状及未来展望
Pub Date : 2022-04-06 DOI: 10.37445/adiu.2022.01.17
S. S. Rzhewuska
The paper is devoted to the history and historiography of the research of the Pidhirtsi group of sites of the Upper and Middle Dnieper basins of the Scythian Age. The source base includes 131 sites (82 of the Pidhirtsi type and 49 of the Mylohrad culture), which are located within the administrative boundaries of modern Ukraine. Chronological range is defined extending from the middle of 7th to the second quarter of 4th century BC. The territory covers the Middle Dnipro, Desna, Upper Horyn and Southern Buh basins which are the border between the forest-steppe and the mixed forests zones. The majority of the sites were explored during fieldwalking survey with prospect trenches. On the excavated Pidhirtsi settlement special openwork bronze adornments identical to the Pidhirtsi treasure were found. Based on these materials in 1950 V. M. Danylenko singled out the Pidhirtsi group of sites. There are four stages of research of the Pidhirtsi sites — from the accumulation of the materials to the interpretation. The first one (1915—1950s) is associated with the formation of the source base. In the second stage (1950—1970s) systematic study of the sites of the Upper and Middle Southern Buh and Lower Dnieper basins began. The third stage (1970—1990s) is characterized by attempts to systematize the identified materials. In the fourth stage (since the 1990s), researchers begin focusing on the interpretation of Pidhirtsi type adornments and implement the results for reconstructing the ethnic and cultural situation of the Middle Dnieper region in the Early Iron Age. For a fact, the openwork bronze (bimetallic) adornments are cultural and chronological markers of the Pidhirtsi group of sites. In conclusion, topical issues of future research will be related to technological and morphological aspects of the Pidhirtsi type adornments, the origin, classification and dating.
本文致力于研究斯基泰时代第聂伯河上游和中部盆地Pidhirtsi组遗址的历史和史学。源库包括131个地点(82个皮吉尔特西文化类型和49个Mylohrad文化),它们位于现代乌克兰的行政边界内。时间范围被定义为从公元前7世纪中期到公元前4世纪的后25年。该地区包括第聂伯罗中部、德斯纳、上霍林和布赫南部盆地,这些盆地是森林草原和混交林地带的边界。大多数地点都是在实地行走调查中使用远景沟进行勘探的。在发掘出的皮齐尔孜聚落上,发现了与皮齐尔孜宝藏相同的特殊镂空青铜装饰品。基于这些材料在1950年的V。丹连科专门挑出了Pidhirtsi遗址群。皮赫特斯遗址的研究经历了从材料积累到解释的四个阶段。第一个阶段(1915年至1950年代)与源基的形成有关。第二阶段(1950 - 70年代)开始了对布河上、中南部和第聂伯河下盆地遗址的系统研究。第三阶段(1970 - 90年代)的特点是试图将已识别的材料系统化。第四阶段(20世纪90年代以来),研究人员开始将重点放在匹迪尔孜式装饰的解读上,并将其成果用于重建铁器时代早期第聂伯河中部地区的民族和文化状况。事实上,镂空青铜(双金属)装饰是Pidhirtsi遗址群的文化和年代标志。综上所述,未来研究的热点问题将涉及皮hirtsi型装饰的技术和形态学方面,起源,分类和年代。
{"title":"PIDHIRTSI GROUP OF SITES: CURRENT STATE AND PROSPECTS OF THE FUTURE RESEARCHES","authors":"S. S. Rzhewuska","doi":"10.37445/adiu.2022.01.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2022.01.17","url":null,"abstract":"The paper is devoted to the history and historiography of the research of the Pidhirtsi group of sites of the Upper and Middle Dnieper basins of the Scythian Age. The source base includes 131 sites (82 of the Pidhirtsi type and 49 of the Mylohrad culture), which are located within the administrative boundaries of modern Ukraine. Chronological range is defined extending from the middle of 7th to the second quarter of 4th century BC. The territory covers the Middle Dnipro, Desna, Upper Horyn and Southern Buh basins which are the border between the forest-steppe and the mixed forests zones. \u0000The majority of the sites were explored during fieldwalking survey with prospect trenches. On the excavated Pidhirtsi settlement special openwork bronze adornments identical to the Pidhirtsi treasure were found. Based on these materials in 1950 V. M. Danylenko singled out the Pidhirtsi group of sites. \u0000There are four stages of research of the Pidhirtsi sites — from the accumulation of the materials to the interpretation. The first one (1915—1950s) is associated with the formation of the source base. In the second stage (1950—1970s) systematic study of the sites of the Upper and Middle Southern Buh and Lower Dnieper basins began. The third stage (1970—1990s) is characterized by attempts to systematize the identified materials. In the fourth stage (since the 1990s), researchers begin focusing on the interpretation of Pidhirtsi type adornments and implement the results for reconstructing the ethnic and cultural situation of the Middle Dnieper region in the Early Iron Age. \u0000For a fact, the openwork bronze (bimetallic) adornments are cultural and chronological markers of the Pidhirtsi group of sites. In conclusion, topical issues of future research will be related to technological and morphological aspects of the Pidhirtsi type adornments, the origin, classification and dating.","PeriodicalId":406948,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132391301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ON THE ISSUE OF THE ARCHITECTURE OF DEFENSIVE STRUCTURES OF THE EASTERN FORTIFICATION OF BILSK HILLFORT 比尔斯克山东工事防御结构的建筑问题
Pub Date : 2022-04-06 DOI: 10.37445/adiu.2022.01.15
S. Zadnikov, I. Shramko
Bilsk is the largest fortified settlement of the Early Iron Age in Europe. The defensive line of the site consists of a rampart and the moat of more than 30 km length surrounding the area of ca. 5 thousand hectares. Over the years of the exploration of this archaeological site the idea of the time of settlement of certain parts of the archaeological complex, the origin and peculiarities of the creation of grand defensive structures was gradually formed. A special role in the process of their formation and use was played by the Eastern fortification, the fortified walls of which existed for more than two centuries. Recent exploration of its rampart and moat taking into account the results obtained last years suggest the creation of strong defencive system on the place of unfortified settlements and offered new vision of the appearance of fortified walls. The analysis of excavation materials of different years allows us to state that the territories occupied by unfortified settlements in the pre-fortress period were much larger and went beyond the future line of wood-earth fortifications. For more than a century and a half in the western part of the settlement complex there were no defencive structures. Only open settlements are known, which appeared in the last third of the 8th century BC. The situation changed in the second half of 6th century BC when the eastern part of the complex was occupied by the population with other traditions. Probably at the beginning of the third quarter of the 6th century BC the founders of the settlement, located in the eastern part of the watershed plateau, surrounded the most important part of the village with a wooden fence (a wall of logs, or mud). A similar wall defended the settlements within the modern Western settlement. The defensive line of the Great Fortress was later planned according to the same principle. We believe that such a light fence, without additional engineering structures, had no defensive significance but determined its own social space of settlements, which housed the estates of local tribal leaders, the most important public buildings and other facilities. Probably belonging to the different tribal groups prompted the inhabitants of the two settlements to strengthen the system of defence and surround the perimeter of each of them with an earthen rampart. The settlements gradually turned into a kind of residence of the local elite. We can assume that in the last third of the 5th century BC or at the beginning of the last quarter of this century, most likely, in the unstable situation in the region, the single strong defensive line in the form of an earthen rampart with a wooden wall on the ridge and a moat in front of them was created. The rampart and moat of the Great Fortress probably delineated the boundaries of the centre of the tribal union. The representatives of different ethnic groups and different social groups lived in this large area. The created defensive line with a length of 3
比尔斯克是欧洲早期铁器时代最大的设防定居点。该遗址的防线由城墙和长达30多公里的护城河组成,环绕着约5000公顷的面积。经过多年对这一考古遗址的探索,人们逐渐形成了这一考古建筑群的某些部分的定居时间、起源和特点,形成了宏伟的防御结构。在它们的形成和使用过程中,东方的防御工事发挥了特殊的作用,这些防御工事存在了两个多世纪。考虑到去年取得的成果,最近对其城墙和护城河的探索表明,在未设防的定居点建立了强大的防御系统,并对设防城墙的外观提供了新的看法。对不同年份的挖掘材料的分析使我们能够指出,在堡垒之前的时期,未设防的定居点所占据的领土要大得多,并且超出了未来的木土防御工事线。一个半多世纪以来,定居点的西部一直没有防御结构。目前已知的只有开放的定居点,它们出现在公元前8世纪的最后三分之一。公元前6世纪下半叶,情况发生了变化,当时建筑群的东部被具有其他传统的人口占领。大概在公元前6世纪的第三季度初,位于流域高原东部的定居点的创始人用木栅栏(圆木或泥墙)包围了村庄最重要的部分。在现代西方定居点内,类似的城墙保护着定居点。大堡垒的防线后来也是按照同样的原则规划的。我们认为,这种没有额外工程结构的轻型围栏没有防御意义,但决定了它自己的社会住区空间,其中容纳了当地部落领导人的庄园、最重要的公共建筑和其他设施。可能属于不同的部落群体,促使这两个定居点的居民加强防御系统,并在每个定居点的周围建造了土墙。这些聚落逐渐变成了一种当地精英的住所。我们可以假设,在公元前5世纪的最后三分之一或本世纪最后四分之一开始,最有可能的是,在该地区局势不稳定的情况下,以土墙的形式建立了一条坚固的防线,山脊上有木墙,前面有护城河。大堡垒的城墙和护城河可能划定了部落联盟中心的边界。不同民族和不同社会群体的代表生活在这片辽阔的土地上。建造的长达35公里的防线直到公元前5世纪中叶直到西方定居点出现的时候都是相关的。在东部定居点,生活又持续了一个半世纪,直到公元前4世纪末。
{"title":"ON THE ISSUE OF THE ARCHITECTURE OF DEFENSIVE STRUCTURES OF THE EASTERN FORTIFICATION OF BILSK HILLFORT","authors":"S. Zadnikov, I. Shramko","doi":"10.37445/adiu.2022.01.15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2022.01.15","url":null,"abstract":"Bilsk is the largest fortified settlement of the Early Iron Age in Europe. The defensive line of the site consists of a rampart and the moat of more than 30 km length surrounding the area of ca. 5 thousand hectares. Over the years of the exploration of this archaeological site the idea of the time of settlement of certain parts of the archaeological complex, the origin and peculiarities of the creation of grand defensive structures was gradually formed. A special role in the process of their formation and use was played by the Eastern fortification, the fortified walls of which existed for more than two centuries. Recent exploration of its rampart and moat taking into account the results obtained last years suggest the creation of strong defencive system on the place of unfortified settlements and offered new vision of the appearance of fortified walls. \u0000The analysis of excavation materials of different years allows us to state that the territories occupied by unfortified settlements in the pre-fortress period were much larger and went beyond the future line of wood-earth fortifications. For more than a century and a half in the western part of the settlement complex there were no defencive structures. Only open settlements are known, which appeared in the last third of the 8th century BC. The situation changed in the second half of 6th century BC when the eastern part of the complex was occupied by the population with other traditions. Probably at the beginning of the third quarter of the 6th century BC the founders of the settlement, located in the eastern part of the watershed plateau, surrounded the most important part of the village with a wooden fence (a wall of logs, or mud). A similar wall defended the settlements within the modern Western settlement. The defensive line of the Great Fortress was later planned according to the same principle. We believe that such a light fence, without additional engineering structures, had no defensive significance but determined its own social space of settlements, which housed the estates of local tribal leaders, the most important public buildings and other facilities. Probably belonging to the different tribal groups prompted the inhabitants of the two settlements to strengthen the system of defence and surround the perimeter of each of them with an earthen rampart. The settlements gradually turned into a kind of residence of the local elite. We can assume that in the last third of the 5th century BC or at the beginning of the last quarter of this century, most likely, in the unstable situation in the region, the single strong defensive line in the form of an earthen rampart with a wooden wall on the ridge and a moat in front of them was created. The rampart and moat of the Great Fortress probably delineated the boundaries of the centre of the tribal union. The representatives of different ethnic groups and different social groups lived in this large area. The created defensive line with a length of 3","PeriodicalId":406948,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134448406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ABYLAI SETTLEMENT — SITE OF THE EARLY IRON AGE IN CENTRAL KAZAKHSTAN 阿比莱定居点-哈萨克斯坦中部铁器时代早期的遗址
Pub Date : 2022-04-06 DOI: 10.37445/adiu.2022.01.09
A. Beisenov
The Abylai settlement was discovered by the author in 2006, and in 2016 the excavations of this site began. This settlement is located in the Karkaralinsky district of the Karaganda region of the Republic of Kazakhstan. In 2016-2021 six field campaigns headed by the author were carried out, the total area of which is more than 1200 m2 (fig. 1). The materials of the 2020 excavation, as well as the overview of the main multidisciplinary studies are published in the paper. Excavation area 5 was 185.5 m2. In this area, the remains of five structures with stone foundation walls, as well as household pits were discovered (fig. 2, 3). One pit has large dimensions: 5.9 × 3.45 m along the top, 5.3 × 2.9 m along the bottom (fig. 4). It was filled with three layers of ash and the soil mixed with ash. Perhaps this pit was used to drain the rain and melt water. The burial (fig. 5, 6), which does not belong to the inhabitants of this culture, was found in the excavation area. Such burials belong to the «Korgantas type» and date to the 4th—5th centuries BC. Fragments of ceramics (fig. 7), numerous stone tools (fig. 8), among which there are objects for grinding grains and other plant residues, hoes, graters, etc., were found in the excavation area. Materials, found in 2020, supplement the information previously received about this site. A large amount of data has now been accumulated. In this regard, the complex of multidisciplinary studies has been launched in recent years. Archaeozoological and traceological analyzes have yielded important results. Based on more than 11,000 animal bones found at the settlement, the composition of the herd, having consisted of sheeps, cows and horses was ascertained. A more important result is the determination of the slaughter season: it turned out that the entire mass of livestock was slaughtered in the period from late autumn to early spring. This conclusion proves the author’s hypothesis about the winter character of such settlements. Part of the bones (over 6000) was found in a large pit measuring 8 × 4 × 0.9 m. These were the bones of sheep and cows, thrown into the pit and covered with ashes. Analyzes showed that all the bones were thrown into the pit at the same time and belong to animals that died in the early spring. This fact is the first case in Kazakhstan of finding the remains of animals that died as a result of spring starvation or epizootic. The entire results of the archaeozoological analysis are now preparing for publication. More than 500 stone tools were found at the site of Abylai. In 2020, 150 items were subjected to trace analysis, as a result of which the functions of 139 tools were determined. Of these, 130 turned out to be tools that were intensively used in various cases: earthworks, vegetation processing, work with livestock products, as well as the processing of metal surfaces (whetstones). Moreover, all bars have traces of iron objects (Beisenov, Gorashchuk, Duysenbay 2021). In 2021, a new gro
作者于2006年发现了阿比莱定居点,并于2016年开始对该遗址进行挖掘。该定居点位于哈萨克斯坦共和国卡拉干达地区的Karkaralinsky区。2016-2021年,笔者牵头开展了6次野外考察,总面积超过1200平方米(图1)。本文发表了2020年的挖掘资料,以及主要多学科研究综述。挖掘面积5为185.5 m2。在这一地区,发现了五座带有石头基础墙的建筑遗迹,以及家庭坑(图2,3)。其中一个坑的尺寸很大:顶部为5.9 × 3.45米,底部为5.3 × 2.9米(图4)。它被三层灰烬填满,土壤与灰烬混合。也许这个坑是用来排雨和融水的。在挖掘区域发现了不属于该文化居民的墓葬(图5、6)。这种墓葬属于“Korgantas类型”,可以追溯到公元前4 - 5世纪。在挖掘区域发现了陶瓷碎片(图7),大量石器(图8),其中有研磨谷物和其他植物残留物的物体,锄头,磨碎器等。在2020年发现的材料补充了之前收到的关于该站点的信息。现在已经积累了大量的数据。在这方面,近年来开展了多学科综合研究。考古和考古分析已经取得了重要的成果。根据在定居点发现的11000多块动物骨头,确定了牧群的组成,包括羊、牛和马。更重要的结果是屠宰季节的确定:整个牲畜的屠宰时间为深秋至早春。这一结论证明了作者关于这些聚落冬季特征的假设。在一个8 × 4 × 0.9米的大坑中发现了部分骨头(超过6000块)。这些是羊和牛的骨头,扔进坑里,用灰烬覆盖。分析表明,所有骨头都是在同一时间被扔进坑里的,属于早春死亡的动物。这是哈萨克斯坦首次发现因春季饥饿或动物流行病而死亡的动物遗骸。考古分析的全部结果现在正准备发表。在阿比莱遗址发现了500多件石器。2020年,对150个项目进行了痕量分析,结果确定了139个工具的功能。其中,有130种工具被广泛用于各种场合:土方工程、植被处理、畜产品加工以及金属表面加工(磨刀石)。此外,所有的铁条都有铁质物体的痕迹(Beisenov, Gorashchuk, Duysenbay 2021)。2021年,对一组新的石器进行了痕迹分析。在250个项目中,202个项目确定了功能。因此,对阿比莱定居点的经济结构进行研究具有良好的前景。通过人类学分析发现的少量种植谷物,包括小米、大麦(图9)和小麦,为该定居点古代居民的生活提供了额外的信息。与塔斯莫拉文化的其他遗址一样,阿比莱定居点的历史可以追溯到公元前8 - 5世纪(Beisenov et al. 2016;Beisenov 2017)。柯甘塔斯时代的墓葬也证实了定居点的终结。这些墓葬的年代在公元前4 - 2世纪。它们的存在证明,早在公元前4世纪,阿比莱定居点就已经被遗弃了。在未来的研究中,应该期望对哈萨克斯坦中部萨卡时代的定居点进行更准确的测年。
{"title":"ABYLAI SETTLEMENT — SITE OF THE EARLY IRON AGE IN CENTRAL KAZAKHSTAN","authors":"A. Beisenov","doi":"10.37445/adiu.2022.01.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2022.01.09","url":null,"abstract":"The Abylai settlement was discovered by the author in 2006, and in 2016 the excavations of this site began. This settlement is located in the Karkaralinsky district of the Karaganda region of the Republic of Kazakhstan. In 2016-2021 six field campaigns headed by the author were carried out, the total area of which is more than 1200 m2 (fig. 1). The materials of the 2020 excavation, as well as the overview of the main multidisciplinary studies are published in the paper. \u0000Excavation area 5 was 185.5 m2. In this area, the remains of five structures with stone foundation walls, as well as household pits were discovered (fig. 2, 3). One pit has large dimensions: 5.9 × 3.45 m along the top, 5.3 × 2.9 m along the bottom (fig. 4). It was filled with three layers of ash and the soil mixed with ash. Perhaps this pit was used to drain the rain and melt water. The burial (fig. 5, 6), which does not belong to the inhabitants of this culture, was found in the excavation area. Such burials belong to the «Korgantas type» and date to the 4th—5th centuries BC. \u0000Fragments of ceramics (fig. 7), numerous stone tools (fig. 8), among which there are objects for grinding grains and other plant residues, hoes, graters, etc., were found in the excavation area. \u0000Materials, found in 2020, supplement the information previously received about this site. A large amount of data has now been accumulated. In this regard, the complex of multidisciplinary studies has been launched in recent years. Archaeozoological and traceological analyzes have yielded important results. Based on more than 11,000 animal bones found at the settlement, the composition of the herd, having consisted of sheeps, cows and horses was ascertained. A more important result is the determination of the slaughter season: it turned out that the entire mass of livestock was slaughtered in the period from late autumn to early spring. This conclusion proves the author’s hypothesis about the winter character of such settlements. Part of the bones (over 6000) was found in a large pit measuring 8 × 4 × 0.9 m. These were the bones of sheep and cows, thrown into the pit and covered with ashes. Analyzes showed that all the bones were thrown into the pit at the same time and belong to animals that died in the early spring. This fact is the first case in Kazakhstan of finding the remains of animals that died as a result of spring starvation or epizootic. The entire results of the archaeozoological analysis are now preparing for publication. \u0000More than 500 stone tools were found at the site of Abylai. In 2020, 150 items were subjected to trace analysis, as a result of which the functions of 139 tools were determined. Of these, 130 turned out to be tools that were intensively used in various cases: earthworks, vegetation processing, work with livestock products, as well as the processing of metal surfaces (whetstones). Moreover, all bars have traces of iron objects (Beisenov, Gorashchuk, Duysenbay 2021). In 2021, a new gro","PeriodicalId":406948,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129544717","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
THE FORTIFIED SETTLEMENT IN CHOTYNIEC IN PREVIOUS STUDIES 在以前的研究中,乔蒂涅克的设防定居点
Pub Date : 2022-04-06 DOI: 10.37445/adiu.2022.01.07
S. Czopek, K. Trybała-Zawiślak, T. Tokarczyk
The article presents the current state of research on the hillfort in Chotyniec, excavated since 2016. The scope and methods of excavations and other research works (e. g. geophysical prospection) are discussed. So far, the focus has been on studying the «zolnik» and identifying the embankments, uncovering an impressive array of artifacts and recording very interesting stratigraphic observations. The original size of the «zolnik» can be calculated (estimated) on the basis of the preserved systems of scattered layers, saturated with burning and charcoal. In the horizontal projection, they marked an almost circular surface with approximate dimensions of 20.8 (E—W) × 21 m (N—S). The maximum height of the «zolnik» could be up to 2 m from its base. The arrangement of layers turned out to be very interesting, allowing the reconstruction of the stages of setting up and using this object. It provided an exceptional amount of artifacts — fragments of ceramics, including Greek amphoras for wine, brown and bone arrowheads, brown pins, a necklace and small ornaments, glass and ceramic beads, clay spindles, «katushki» and a fragment of a figurine. The series of other ceramics is also very important, among which typical forms like pots and bowls. Completely reconstructed amphora of Klazomenei, as well as fragments of others, including those related to the Lesbos circle, indicate a convergent chronology at the end of the 7th and the beginning of the 6th century BC. A similar chronology is shared by brown and bone arrowheads, representing different types within four main groups dated from the end or even from the 2nd half of the 7th century BC to the middle of the 6th century BC. On the other hand, the series of radiocarbon dates, in connection with the stratigraphy, shows a slightly different chronological range. It confirms the older horizon from the second half of the 7th century, but also clearly points to the 6th—5th centuries BC, and one of the dates is even younger. The hillfort in Chotyniec, together with the surrounding settlements, forms a very interesting settlement complex — the most northwestern enclave of the Scythian cultural circle. We can say that it is an extremely interesting microregion, and its importance is multifaceted. It concerns the possibility of getting to know the relations (e. g. chronological, functional, etc.) of the settlement and its surroundings, which is not so common in the archeology of the Early Iron Age in this part of Europe. In a broader territorial perspective, the Chotyniec agglomeration forces corrections to the existing, well-established findings on the relationship of the Scythian world with other cultures — e. g. the Lusatian cultural circle or a group of groups and cultures in Volhynia.
本文介绍了自2016年以来挖掘的乔蒂涅克山丘的研究现状。讨论了挖掘和其他研究工作(如地球物理勘探)的范围和方法。到目前为止,重点是研究“zolnik”和确定堤防,发现了一系列令人印象深刻的人工制品,并记录了非常有趣的地层观察结果。“zolnik”的原始大小可以根据保存的分散层系统计算(估计),燃烧和木炭饱和。在水平投影中,他们标记了一个近似圆形的表面,尺寸约为20.8 (E-W) × 21 m (N-S)。“zolnik”的最大高度可以从它的底部达到2米。层的排列非常有趣,允许重建设置和使用这个对象的阶段。它提供了数量惊人的文物-陶瓷碎片,包括希腊葡萄酒双耳罐,棕色和骨箭头,棕色别针,项链和小饰品,玻璃和陶瓷珠,粘土纺锤,“katushki”和一个小雕像的碎片。其他陶瓷系列也很重要,其中典型的形式是锅和碗。完全重建的克拉佐梅尼双耳罐,以及其他的碎片,包括那些与莱斯沃斯圈有关的,表明在公元前7世纪末和公元前6世纪初出现了一个重合的年代。棕色箭头和骨箭头也有类似的年表,它们代表了四个主要群体的不同类型,时间跨度从公元前7世纪末期甚至是公元前6世纪中期。另一方面,一系列放射性碳测年,结合地层学,显示了一个略有不同的年代范围。它证实了7世纪下半叶的更古老的地平线,但也清楚地指向公元前6 - 5世纪,其中一个日期甚至更年轻。乔特尼茨的山丘与周围的聚落一起,形成了一个非常有趣的聚落建筑群——斯基泰文化圈最西北的飞地。我们可以说这是一个非常有趣的微区域,它的重要性是多方面的。它涉及到了解定居点与其周围环境的关系(例如时间,功能等)的可能性,这在欧洲这部分地区早期铁器时代的考古中并不常见。从更广泛的领土角度来看,乔蒂尼亚的聚集迫使对现有的、已经确立的关于斯基泰世界与其他文化之间关系的发现进行修正——例如,卢萨丁文化圈或Volhynia的一群群体和文化。
{"title":"THE FORTIFIED SETTLEMENT IN CHOTYNIEC IN PREVIOUS STUDIES","authors":"S. Czopek, K. Trybała-Zawiślak, T. Tokarczyk","doi":"10.37445/adiu.2022.01.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2022.01.07","url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the current state of research on the hillfort in Chotyniec, excavated since 2016. The scope and methods of excavations and other research works (e. g. geophysical prospection) are discussed. So far, the focus has been on studying the «zolnik» and identifying the embankments, uncovering an impressive array of artifacts and recording very interesting stratigraphic observations. The original size of the «zolnik» can be calculated (estimated) on the basis of the preserved systems of scattered layers, saturated with burning and charcoal. In the horizontal projection, they marked an almost circular surface with approximate dimensions of 20.8 (E—W) × 21 m (N—S). The maximum height of the «zolnik» could be up to 2 m from its base. The arrangement of layers turned out to be very interesting, allowing the reconstruction of the stages of setting up and using this object. It provided an exceptional amount of artifacts — fragments of ceramics, including Greek amphoras for wine, brown and bone arrowheads, brown pins, a necklace and small ornaments, glass and ceramic beads, clay spindles, «katushki» and a fragment of a figurine. The series of other ceramics is also very important, among which typical forms like pots and bowls. Completely reconstructed amphora of Klazomenei, as well as fragments of others, including those related to the Lesbos circle, indicate a convergent chronology at the end of the 7th and the beginning of the 6th century BC. A similar chronology is shared by brown and bone arrowheads, representing different types within four main groups dated from the end or even from the 2nd half of the 7th century BC to the middle of the 6th century BC. On the other hand, the series of radiocarbon dates, in connection with the stratigraphy, shows a slightly different chronological range. It confirms the older horizon from the second half of the 7th century, but also clearly points to the 6th—5th centuries BC, and one of the dates is even younger. The hillfort in Chotyniec, together with the surrounding settlements, forms a very interesting settlement complex — the most northwestern enclave of the Scythian cultural circle. We can say that it is an extremely interesting microregion, and its importance is multifaceted. It concerns the possibility of getting to know the relations (e. g. chronological, functional, etc.) of the settlement and its surroundings, which is not so common in the archeology of the Early Iron Age in this part of Europe. In a broader territorial perspective, the Chotyniec agglomeration forces corrections to the existing, well-established findings on the relationship of the Scythian world with other cultures — e. g. the Lusatian cultural circle or a group of groups and cultures in Volhynia.","PeriodicalId":406948,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114711062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
EXCAVATION OF THE BURIAL GROUND KARIV I OF ROMAN AGE IN THE WESTERN BUG BASIN IN 2019—2020 2019-2020年西bug盆地罗马时代kariv I墓葬发掘
Pub Date : 2022-04-06 DOI: 10.37445/adiu.2022.01.11
Ja. I. Onyshchuk
The paper highlights the results of research conducted in 2019—2020 at the archaeological site cremation burial ground Kariv I of the Roman period in the basin of the Western Bug River. During the excavations 3 cremation burials were found which perhaps included the remains of one male and two females. Noteworthy is the partially destroyed female burial 12. Rich items of funeral inventory were found there, including the household items, metal costume details, jewelry, including jewelry made of yellow metal. The tilth soil layer contained fragments of glass and ceramic imported utensils, brooches, weapons and horse harness, armour ect. In total 12 cremation burials (including one pair burial) with a variety of equipment were found on the area of 1456 m2 during the entire period of research on the burial ground Kariv I. The remains of thirteen people were found in the burial assemblages: seven men, five women and one adolescent child (infantilis II group). We can suppose that the site may have been a burial place for barbarian elite and members of its inner circle. On the basis of numerous finds (brooches, spurs, tips of drinking horns, amphorae, glass and bronze vessels, etc.), most of which come from closed assemblages, the chronology of the burial ground is ascertained by the second half of the 2nd century CE (phase B2/C1). The people who left the site had mixed cultural traits. The mix of funeral traditions of the Przeworsk culture with notable South Germanic (Suebian), Baltic and Venetian elements can be found on the site. The events of the Marcomannic Wars, during or after which some members of the barbarian coalition tried to leave the troubled areas of the Middle Danube, moving away from Roman political influence in the European Barbaricum, perhaps may be the reason of appearance in the region of the population whom the burial ground belong.
该论文重点介绍了2019年至2020年在西布格河流域罗马时期的考古遗址卡里夫一世火葬场进行的研究结果。在挖掘过程中,发现了3个火葬葬,其中可能包括一名男性和两名女性的遗骸。值得注意的是部分毁坏的女性墓葬。在那里发现了丰富的丧葬物品,包括家庭用品,金属服装细节,珠宝,包括黄色金属制成的珠宝。土壤层有玻璃和陶瓷的碎片,进口器皿,胸针,武器和马具,盔甲等。在整个对Kariv i墓地的研究期间,在1456平方米的面积上共发现了12个火葬(包括一个双葬)和各种设备。在墓葬组合中发现了13人的遗骸:7名男性,5名女性和1名青少年儿童(infantilis II组)。我们可以推测,这个遗址可能是埋葬蛮族精英及其核心圈子成员的地方。根据大量的发现(胸针、马刺、饮水角的尖端、双耳罐、玻璃和青铜器等),其中大部分来自封闭的组合,墓地的年代是在公元2世纪下半叶确定的(B2/C1阶段)。离开遗址的人有着复杂的文化特征。普热沃斯克文化的葬礼传统与著名的南日耳曼(苏比亚)、波罗的海和威尼斯元素的结合可以在这里找到。在马尔科马尼战争期间或之后,蛮族联盟的一些成员试图离开多瑙河中部的动乱地区,以摆脱罗马在欧洲蛮族地区的政治影响,这些事件可能是出现在墓地所属地区的人口的原因。
{"title":"EXCAVATION OF THE BURIAL GROUND KARIV I OF ROMAN AGE IN THE WESTERN BUG BASIN IN 2019—2020","authors":"Ja. I. Onyshchuk","doi":"10.37445/adiu.2022.01.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2022.01.11","url":null,"abstract":"The paper highlights the results of research conducted in 2019—2020 at the archaeological site cremation burial ground Kariv I of the Roman period in the basin of the Western Bug River. During the excavations 3 cremation burials were found which perhaps included the remains of one male and two females. Noteworthy is the partially destroyed female burial 12. Rich items of funeral inventory were found there, including the household items, metal costume details, jewelry, including jewelry made of yellow metal. The tilth soil layer contained fragments of glass and ceramic imported utensils, brooches, weapons and horse harness, armour ect. In total 12 cremation burials (including one pair burial) with a variety of equipment were found on the area of 1456 m2 during the entire period of research on the burial ground Kariv I. The remains of thirteen people were found in the burial assemblages: seven men, five women and one adolescent child (infantilis II group). We can suppose that the site may have been a burial place for barbarian elite and members of its inner circle. On the basis of numerous finds (brooches, spurs, tips of drinking horns, amphorae, glass and bronze vessels, etc.), most of which come from closed assemblages, the chronology of the burial ground is ascertained by the second half of the 2nd century CE (phase B2/C1). The people who left the site had mixed cultural traits. The mix of funeral traditions of the Przeworsk culture with notable South Germanic (Suebian), Baltic and Venetian elements can be found on the site. The events of the Marcomannic Wars, during or after which some members of the barbarian coalition tried to leave the troubled areas of the Middle Danube, moving away from Roman political influence in the European Barbaricum, perhaps may be the reason of appearance in the region of the population whom the burial ground belong.","PeriodicalId":406948,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129797043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
THE BARROW OF THE EARLY IRON AGE NEAR MOTRONYN HILLFORT 铁器时代早期的手推车,靠近摩特罗宁丘陵
Pub Date : 2021-11-17 DOI: 10.37445/adiu.2021.04.05
O. Mogylov, K. Panchenko, S. Rudenko
In 2019, the Scythian Right-bank expedition organized by the Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and the National Historical and Cultural Reserve «Chyhyryn» excavated the barrows on the Motronyn hillfort suburb, located near Melnyky village, Chyhyryn district, Cherkasy Region, in the south of the Forest-Steppe of Dnieper Right-bank area. The barrows were erected in pre-Scythian Age and the barrow 97 also contained the inlet Scythian burial. This mound was 0.65 m high, the diameter was 8.8—9.8 m. A pre-Scythian burial-memorial complex was discovered under the mound, destroyed by a later burial. Finds from it are represented by fragments of ceramic ware: pots, large earthenware pots, bowls, ladles. Some fragments are decorated with geometric patterns. Ceramic spindle whorls, iron knives, bronze arrowheads, plaques, and animal bones were also found. During the Middle Scythian period another deceased was buried in the center of the mound. The tomb had the shape of a rectangular pit, oriented along the west — east line. Its length was 1.89—2.16 m, width — 0.7—0.82 m, depth from the surface of the mound — 1.45 m. The skeleton laid supine, with its head to the west. The left leg was lying on a stone slab. A quiver with arrows was placed next to it. An iron sword and a knife with a bone handle were found near the belt. This burial was also accompanied with the laying of wares in the mound borders. A pot was buried in the north, and handmade and wheel-made bowls in the east. Pre-Scythian finds from the mound have analogies in different regions of the Ukrainian Forest-Steppe where antiquities of the Late Chornoliska and Zhabotyn cultures are widespread, in particular on the Middle Dniester and in the Southern Bug River region, on the Right-bank of the Dnieper and in the Vorskla River region. A set of pottery and an arrowhead of the Novocherkassk type allows us to date the mentioned assemblage by the second half of the 8th century BC. Funeral rite and grave goods of the Scythian Age burial also have parallels in the sites of that time, including the south of the Right-bank of Middle Dnieper. According to the pot type and arrowheads, this burial can be dated to the second half of the 6th century BC.
2019年,由乌克兰国家科学院考古研究所和国家历史文化保护区“Chyhyryn”组织的斯基泰右岸探险队在切尔卡西地区Chyhyryn区Melnyky村附近的Motronyn山麓郊区挖掘了这些古墓,位于第聂伯河右岸地区森林草原南部。这些古墓建于前斯基泰时代,古墓97也包含了斯基泰人的墓葬。丘高0.65米,直径8.8-9.8米。在土堆下发现了一个前斯基泰人的墓葬纪念建筑群,被后来的埋葬所摧毁。从这里发现的陶器碎片有:锅、大陶罐、碗、长柄勺。一些碎片上装饰着几何图案。此外,还发现了陶瓷轴轮、铁刀、青铜箭头、牌匾和动物骨头。在中斯基泰时期,另一名死者被埋葬在土丘的中心。墓的形状是一个长方形的坑,沿东西方向排列。其长度为1.89 ~ 2.16 m,宽度为- 0.7 ~ 0.82 m,距离土丘表面的深度为- 1.45 m。这具骷髅仰卧着,头朝西。左腿躺在一块石板上。旁边放着一个箭筒。腰带附近还发现了一把铁剑和一把骨柄刀。这种埋葬也伴随着在土丘边缘放置物品。北部埋有一口锅,东部埋有手工和轮制的碗。前斯基泰人的发现在乌克兰森林草原的不同地区有相似之处,在那里,晚乔诺利斯卡和扎博廷文化的文物广泛存在,特别是在德涅斯特中部和南布格河地区,在第聂伯河右岸和沃斯克拉河地区。一套新切尔卡斯克类型的陶器和一个箭头使我们能够在公元前8世纪下半叶确定上述组合的年代。斯基泰时代的葬礼仪式和墓葬在当时的遗址也有相似之处,包括中第聂伯河右岸以南。根据壶的类型和箭头,这个埋葬可以追溯到公元前6世纪下半叶。
{"title":"THE BARROW OF THE EARLY IRON AGE NEAR MOTRONYN HILLFORT","authors":"O. Mogylov, K. Panchenko, S. Rudenko","doi":"10.37445/adiu.2021.04.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2021.04.05","url":null,"abstract":"In 2019, the Scythian Right-bank expedition organized by the Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and the National Historical and Cultural Reserve «Chyhyryn» excavated the barrows on the Motronyn hillfort suburb, located near Melnyky village, Chyhyryn district, Cherkasy Region, in the south of the Forest-Steppe of Dnieper Right-bank area. \u0000The barrows were erected in pre-Scythian Age and the barrow 97 also contained the inlet Scythian burial. This mound was 0.65 m high, the diameter was 8.8—9.8 m. A pre-Scythian burial-memorial complex was discovered under the mound, destroyed by a later burial. Finds from it are represented by fragments of ceramic ware: pots, large earthenware pots, bowls, ladles. Some fragments are decorated with geometric patterns. Ceramic spindle whorls, iron knives, bronze arrowheads, plaques, and animal bones were also found. \u0000During the Middle Scythian period another deceased was buried in the center of the mound. The tomb had the shape of a rectangular pit, oriented along the west — east line. Its length was 1.89—2.16 m, width — 0.7—0.82 m, depth from the surface of the mound — 1.45 m. The skeleton laid supine, with its head to the west. The left leg was lying on a stone slab. A quiver with arrows was placed next to it. An iron sword and a knife with a bone handle were found near the belt. This burial was also accompanied with the laying of wares in the mound borders. A pot was buried in the north, and handmade and wheel-made bowls in the east. \u0000Pre-Scythian finds from the mound have analogies in different regions of the Ukrainian Forest-Steppe where antiquities of the Late Chornoliska and Zhabotyn cultures are widespread, in particular on the Middle Dniester and in the Southern Bug River region, on the Right-bank of the Dnieper and in the Vorskla River region. A set of pottery and an arrowhead of the Novocherkassk type allows us to date the mentioned assemblage by the second half of the 8th century BC. \u0000Funeral rite and grave goods of the Scythian Age burial also have parallels in the sites of that time, including the south of the Right-bank of Middle Dnieper. According to the pot type and arrowheads, this burial can be dated to the second half of the 6th century BC.","PeriodicalId":406948,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133869771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
SARMATIAN BURIALS EXCAVATED BY DMYTRO BEREZOVETS AT THE LOWER DNIEPER BASIN dmytro berezovets在第聂伯河下游盆地发掘的萨尔马墓葬
Pub Date : 2021-11-03 DOI: 10.37445/adiu.2021.03.22
A. Symonenko
During the campaigns of 1951 and 1953 Dmytro Berezovets excavated the Sarmatian graves near the Kut, Hrushivka and Marianske villages of Apostolovski district of Dnipropetrovsk region. These materials were published briefly, without typological and chronological definitions and analysis of the historical context, with illustrations of rather low quality. Moreover, there was some confusion and errors later made by some researchers, including the author, which have been replicated with each reference. Therefore, it is worthy to republish these materials from the standpoint of the current level of the Sarmatian studies in order to correct certain errors as well. Dmytro Berezovets has discovered the assemblages both of Early Sarmatian (Kut, Hrushivka, Maryanske, barrow 3, grave 4) and Middle Sarmatian Age (Marianske, barroow 5, graves 5—7; barrow 5, grave 6; barrow 6, grave 14) according to traditional chronology. All Sarmatian burials under study were the secondary graves in the Bronze Age mounds and Scythian ones. The skeletons lied supine, with their heads directed to Northern sector. Among the grave goods are the Roman and Sarmatiam pottery, simple bronze adornment, cornelian, jade and glass beads, bronze mirror, bone ritual spoon etc. The Early Sarmatian assemblages discovered by Dmytro Berezovets are dated to the late 2nd—1st century BC, the Middle Sarmatiam ones to the 1st—2nd centuries AD. The identical funeral rite of the graves of different date near Marianske once again confirms the validity of the periodization proposed by me in due time, according to which all the graves under study belong to different phases of the first period (phase A2 — Kut, Hrushivka, Marianske, barrow 3, grave 4; phase B — Marianske, barrow 3, graves 5—7; barrow 5, grave 6; barrow 6, grave 14).
在1951年和1953年的战役中,德米特罗·别列佐韦茨挖掘了第聂伯罗彼得罗夫斯克州阿波斯托洛夫斯基区库特、赫鲁什夫卡和马里安斯克村附近的萨尔马提亚人坟墓。这些材料发表简短,没有类型学和时间顺序的定义和历史背景的分析,插图质量相当低。此外,包括作者在内的一些研究人员后来犯了一些混淆和错误,这些错误已经在每次参考文献中重复了一遍。因此,从萨尔马提亚研究的当前水平来看,重新出版这些材料是值得的,以纠正某些错误。Dmytro Berezovets发现了早期萨尔马提亚(Kut, Hrushivka, Maryanske, barrow 3, grave 4)和中期萨尔马提亚(Marianske, barrow 5, graves 5 - 7;坟5,坟6;按传统年表排列的坟墓。所研究的所有撒马提亚墓葬都是青铜时代的土丘和斯基泰人的二级墓葬。这些骷髅仰卧着,头朝向北边。陪葬品包括罗马和撒马提亚陶器、简单的青铜装饰品、科尼莲、玉器和玻璃珠、铜镜、骨仪式匙等。Dmytro Berezovets发现的早期萨尔马提亚组合可以追溯到公元前2 - 1世纪晚期,中期萨尔马提亚组合可以追溯到公元1 - 2世纪。马里安斯克附近不同日期的坟墓的葬礼仪式相同,再次证实了我适时提出的分期的有效性,根据该分期,所有正在研究的坟墓都属于第一时期的不同阶段(阶段A2 -库特,赫鲁什夫卡,马里安斯克,古墓3,坟墓4;B阶段- Marianske, barrow 3, graves 5-7;坟5,坟6;古墓,坟墓。
{"title":"SARMATIAN BURIALS EXCAVATED BY DMYTRO BEREZOVETS AT THE LOWER DNIEPER BASIN","authors":"A. Symonenko","doi":"10.37445/adiu.2021.03.22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2021.03.22","url":null,"abstract":"During the campaigns of 1951 and 1953 Dmytro Berezovets excavated the Sarmatian graves near the Kut, Hrushivka and Marianske villages of Apostolovski district of Dnipropetrovsk region. These materials were published briefly, without typological and chronological definitions and analysis of the historical context, with illustrations of rather low quality. Moreover, there was some confusion and errors later made by some researchers, including the author, which have been replicated with each reference. Therefore, it is worthy to republish these materials from the standpoint of the current level of the Sarmatian studies in order to correct certain errors as well. \u0000Dmytro Berezovets has discovered the assemblages both of Early Sarmatian (Kut, Hrushivka, Maryanske, barrow 3, grave 4) and Middle Sarmatian Age (Marianske, barroow 5, graves 5—7; barrow 5, grave 6; barrow 6, grave 14) according to traditional chronology. All Sarmatian burials under study were the secondary graves in the Bronze Age mounds and Scythian ones. The skeletons lied supine, with their heads directed to Northern sector. Among the grave goods are the Roman and Sarmatiam pottery, simple bronze adornment, cornelian, jade and glass beads, bronze mirror, bone ritual spoon etc. The Early Sarmatian assemblages discovered by Dmytro Berezovets are dated to the late 2nd—1st century BC, the Middle Sarmatiam ones to the 1st—2nd centuries AD. The identical funeral rite of the graves of different date near Marianske once again confirms the validity of the periodization proposed by me in due time, according to which all the graves under study belong to different phases of the first period (phase A2 — Kut, Hrushivka, Marianske, barrow 3, grave 4; phase B — Marianske, barrow 3, graves 5—7; barrow 5, grave 6; barrow 6, grave 14).","PeriodicalId":406948,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116439480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ANCIENT ROADS NEAR DAVYDIV BRID AT INGULETS RIVER 古道附近的戴维迪夫桥在沟河
Pub Date : 2021-11-03 DOI: 10.37445/adiu.2021.03.10
O. Kariaka
In recent years, due to expansion of the capabilities of using high-resolution satellite images and their availability on many resources on the Internet, the possibility of identifying new sites is becoming especially relevant. In order to reveal the ability of land communications as well as for the study of close relationship of the barrows and steppe roads we made the attempt to map them as completely as possible using the remote sensing methods in the area between the Dnieper and the Lower Ingulets Rivers. The coverage of large territory made it possible to identify the place of the highest concentration of road residues which was located near the modern village of Davydiv Brid (Beryslav district, Kherson region). There were three identified so-called «Stars» — Bajdak-Mohyla, Shurzhyna and Bilohirka. At the base of each of them was a large mound of the 6—8 m high. All of them were in the line of sight from one to another and marked the place of the traditional crossing of the Ingulets River. On the basis of the remnants of roads associated with them the main directions of movement were identified: 1) the largest to the southeast to the area of the modern city of Beryslav; 2) a less saturated but clearly traced eastern route to the area of the modern Dudchany village; 3) along the Ingulets valley on the top of the steppe plateau. The internal structure and arrangement of the mounds and remains of roads is very complicated and can only be partially reconstructed. For example, we consider the fact of the seasonal use of Shurzhin’s star to bypass two lowlands located near Bajdak-Mogyla as obvious. From the last point several direct routes of the southeastern direction can be traced which were convenient in the dry season. The attempt to compare the roads identified by us with the paths of the «three-verst Schubert map» of the 19th century had a few results. Only in some cases it is possible to trace the coincidence of the historical paths with those recorded by us in the southeastern direction and only on certain sections. In the eastern direction and the route along Ingulets there are no this kind of coincidences were actually revealed. As a result we consider it necessary to admit that the remains of the roads we have recorded should be considered a special type of archaeological monuments accompanying other objects, primarily mounds. The phenomenon of the remains of these roads and the «stars» described by us is the phenomenon which reflects the certain part of human activity in the past and should be studied with the involvement of the as largest as possible territories and conducting field research.
近年来,由于使用高分辨率卫星图像的能力得到扩大,而且这些图像可在互联网上的许多资源上获得,因此确定新地点的可能性变得特别重要。为了揭示陆地通信的能力,以及为了研究沟壑和草原道路的密切关系,我们尝试在第聂伯河和下ingulet河之间的地区使用遥感方法尽可能完整地绘制它们的地图。由于覆盖了大片领土,因此有可能确定位于现代村庄Davydiv Brid (Beryslav区,Kherson地区)附近的道路残留物最集中的地方。有三颗被确认的所谓“星星”- -巴伊达克-莫希拉、舒尔日纳和比洛希尔卡。每座石碑的底部都有一个高6-8米的大土丘。所有这些都在视线范围内,标志着传统的伊格莱特河的渡口。根据与之相关的道路的残余,确定了主要的运动方向:1)最大的东南到现代城市别里斯拉夫地区;2)一条不太饱和但清晰可追溯的东线,通往现代的达查尼村;3)沿着草原高原顶部的Ingulets山谷。土堆和道路遗迹的内部结构和排列非常复杂,只能部分重建。例如,我们认为舒尔津星的季节性使用绕过位于巴达克-莫吉拉附近的两个低地的事实是显而易见的。从最后一点出发,可以找到几条东南方向的直达路线,在旱季很方便。将我们所确定的道路与19世纪的“舒伯特三俄里地图”的道路进行比较的尝试有一些结果。只有在某些情况下,在东南方向,只有在某些部分,才有可能追踪到历史路径与我们所记录的一致。在东部方向和沿Ingulets的路线上,实际上并没有发现这种巧合。因此,我们认为有必要承认,我们所记录的道路遗迹应被视为一种特殊类型的考古遗迹,与其他物体(主要是土墩)并列。我们所描述的这些道路和“星星”的遗迹现象是反映过去人类活动的某些部分的现象,应该在尽可能大的领域参与并进行实地研究的情况下进行研究。
{"title":"ANCIENT ROADS NEAR DAVYDIV BRID AT INGULETS RIVER","authors":"O. Kariaka","doi":"10.37445/adiu.2021.03.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2021.03.10","url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, due to expansion of the capabilities of using high-resolution satellite images and their availability on many resources on the Internet, the possibility of identifying new sites is becoming especially relevant. In order to reveal the ability of land communications as well as for the study of close relationship of the barrows and steppe roads we made the attempt to map them as completely as possible using the remote sensing methods in the area between the Dnieper and the Lower Ingulets Rivers. \u0000The coverage of large territory made it possible to identify the place of the highest concentration of road residues which was located near the modern village of Davydiv Brid (Beryslav district, Kherson region). There were three identified so-called «Stars» — Bajdak-Mohyla, Shurzhyna and Bilohirka. At the base of each of them was a large mound of the 6—8 m high. All of them were in the line of sight from one to another and marked the place of the traditional crossing of the Ingulets River. \u0000On the basis of the remnants of roads associated with them the main directions of movement were identified: 1) the largest to the southeast to the area of the modern city of Beryslav; 2) a less saturated but clearly traced eastern route to the area of the modern Dudchany village; 3) along the Ingulets valley on the top of the steppe plateau. \u0000The internal structure and arrangement of the mounds and remains of roads is very complicated and can only be partially reconstructed. For example, we consider the fact of the seasonal use of Shurzhin’s star to bypass two lowlands located near Bajdak-Mogyla as obvious. From the last point several direct routes of the southeastern direction can be traced which were convenient in the dry season. \u0000The attempt to compare the roads identified by us with the paths of the «three-verst Schubert map» of the 19th century had a few results. Only in some cases it is possible to trace the coincidence of the historical paths with those recorded by us in the southeastern direction and only on certain sections. In the eastern direction and the route along Ingulets there are no this kind of coincidences were actually revealed. \u0000As a result we consider it necessary to admit that the remains of the roads we have recorded should be considered a special type of archaeological monuments accompanying other objects, primarily mounds. The phenomenon of the remains of these roads and the «stars» described by us is the phenomenon which reflects the certain part of human activity in the past and should be studied with the involvement of the as largest as possible territories and conducting field research.","PeriodicalId":406948,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine","volume":"182 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133863380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
GRAFFITI FROM THE WESTERN OUTSKIRTS OF OLBIA PONTICA 奥尔比亚庞蒂卡西郊的涂鸦
Pub Date : 2021-11-03 DOI: 10.37445/adiu.2021.03.04
A. Rusiaieva, A. G. Kuzmishchev, J. Fornasier
This paper is preliminary review of a small collection of graffiti from the latest excavations on the western outskirts of Olbia Pontica (the so-called «suburbs») in 2015—2020, and their introduction into scientific circulation. The excavations were conducted by the Olbia International Archaeological Expedition led by A. V. Bujskikh as the part of Ukrainian-German multidisciplinary project (co-directors A. V. Bujskikh and J. Fornasier). The researches on the suburbs were headed by A. G. Kuzmischev and J. Fornasier. Over six years of research in various cultural strata and in the fillings of half-dugouts, pits and other objects more than 50 graffiti have been found, inscribed mainly on the fragments of Attic black-lacquered tableware of the 5th—4th centuries BC. Emphasis is placed on determining the main types of inscriptions and their features. Regardless of the year and location of discovery they are divided into five groups: A. Abbreviated anthroponyms or individual words; B. Initials of proper names or one-letter marks; C. Graffiti on treated ostracons; D. Various digital signs and records; E. Graffiti of unclear meaning. The collection under study significantly supplemented the source base of the small epigraphy of the Olbia polis. However, no original, rare and to some extent important informative inscriptions which were recorded in temenos, residential neighborhoods, in some settlements and in Borisfen have been found yet here. In addition the damage of many graffiti makes impossible to interpret them reliably. In no one case we could identify reliably the inscriptions dedicated to any deities. Instead, the large number of abbreviated names and initials of the owners of dishes coincides with a significant import of Attic black-lacquered ceramics in the life of the inhabitants of the suburbs in the 5th—4th centuries BC. Despite the relatively limited number, processed ostracons have replenished this category of Olbia votive finds by the original graffiti of magical significance. At the same time, the fact that in general in the suburbs is a lot of graffiti with digital markings which are most often attributed to traders, deserves special attention. Of course, in the future, all the graffiti from the suburbs need a more detailed visual study both as the fragments of ceramics and their exact professional sketches, and comparative analysis of this type of inscriptions from many ancient Greek sites.
本文是对2015-2020年在Olbia Pontica西郊(所谓的“郊区”)最新发掘的一小部分涂鸦的初步回顾,并将其引入科学循环。发掘工作是由A. V. Bujskikh领导的奥尔比亚国际考古考察队作为乌克兰-德国多学科项目的一部分进行的(联合主任A. V. Bujskikh和J. Fornasier)。对郊区的研究以A. G. Kuzmischev和J. Fornasier为首。经过六年多的研究,在不同的文化层和半坑、坑和其他物体的填充物中发现了50多幅涂鸦,主要刻在公元前5 - 4世纪阿提卡黑漆餐具的碎片上。重点是确定铭文的主要类型及其特征。不管发现的年份和地点如何,它们被分为五组:A.缩写的拟人词或单独的词;B.专有名称的首字母或单字母标记;C.在处理过的鸵鸟上涂鸦;D.各种数字标志和记录;E.意义不明的涂鸦。所研究的藏品大大补充了奥尔比亚城邦小型铭文的来源基础。然而,在temenos、居民区、一些定居点和Borisfen尚未发现原始的、罕见的、在某种程度上具有重要信息的铭文。此外,许多涂鸦的损坏使得无法可靠地解释它们。在任何一种情况下,我们都不能可靠地识别出献给任何神灵的铭文。相反,盘子主人的大量缩写名字和首字母缩写与公元前5 - 4世纪郊区居民生活中重要的阿提卡黑漆陶瓷进口相吻合。尽管数量相对有限,但经过加工的ostracon已经通过原始的具有神奇意义的涂鸦补充了这一类别的奥尔比亚献祭发现。与此同时,在郊区普遍存在大量带有数字标记的涂鸦,这些涂鸦通常被认为是交易员所为,这一事实值得特别注意。当然,在未来,所有来自郊区的涂鸦都需要更详细的视觉研究,无论是陶瓷碎片和它们精确的专业草图,还是对许多古希腊遗址的这类铭文进行比较分析。
{"title":"GRAFFITI FROM THE WESTERN OUTSKIRTS OF OLBIA PONTICA","authors":"A. Rusiaieva, A. G. Kuzmishchev, J. Fornasier","doi":"10.37445/adiu.2021.03.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2021.03.04","url":null,"abstract":"This paper is preliminary review of a small collection of graffiti from the latest excavations on the western outskirts of Olbia Pontica (the so-called «suburbs») in 2015—2020, and their introduction into scientific circulation. \u0000The excavations were conducted by the Olbia International Archaeological Expedition led by A. V. Bujskikh as the part of Ukrainian-German multidisciplinary project (co-directors A. V. Bujskikh and J. Fornasier). The researches on the suburbs were headed by A. G. Kuzmischev and J. Fornasier. Over six years of research in various cultural strata and in the fillings of half-dugouts, pits and other objects more than 50 graffiti have been found, inscribed mainly on the fragments of Attic black-lacquered tableware of the 5th—4th centuries BC. Emphasis is placed on determining the main types of inscriptions and their features. Regardless of the year and location of discovery they are divided into five groups: A. Abbreviated anthroponyms or individual words; B. Initials of proper names or one-letter marks; C. Graffiti on treated ostracons; D. Various digital signs and records; E. Graffiti of unclear meaning. The collection under study significantly supplemented the source base of the small epigraphy of the Olbia polis. However, no original, rare and to some extent important informative inscriptions which were recorded in temenos, residential neighborhoods, in some settlements and in Borisfen have been found yet here. In addition the damage of many graffiti makes impossible to interpret them reliably. In no one case we could identify reliably the inscriptions dedicated to any deities. Instead, the large number of abbreviated names and initials of the owners of dishes coincides with a significant import of Attic black-lacquered ceramics in the life of the inhabitants of the suburbs in the 5th—4th centuries BC. Despite the relatively limited number, processed ostracons have replenished this category of Olbia votive finds by the original graffiti of magical significance. At the same time, the fact that in general in the suburbs is a lot of graffiti with digital markings which are most often attributed to traders, deserves special attention. Of course, in the future, all the graffiti from the suburbs need a more detailed visual study both as the fragments of ceramics and their exact professional sketches, and comparative analysis of this type of inscriptions from many ancient Greek sites.","PeriodicalId":406948,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine","volume":"2016 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114785217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
DECORATIONS FROM SHELLS IN THE ADORNMENTS OF EARLY MEDIEVAL SLAVS 中世纪早期奴隶用贝壳做的装饰品
Pub Date : 2021-11-03 DOI: 10.37445/adiu.2021.03.16
Y. V. Volodarets-Urbanovіch
The pendant from Luka-Kavetchyna, dwelling 25 (fig. 2: 1; 3) is the earliest find from the Slavs sites da­ting to the second quarter — the end of the 5th century. The adornment was made of a shell of the genus Murex and is the «legacy» from the Cherniakhіv culture. In the area of that culture are known the pendants made of shells of this genus (type 2 by O. Hopkalo). The pendants from shells appear in use of the Slavs since the second half of the 6th century. Their varieties were used until the first half of the 8th century, although the assemblages and finds with them are few (table 1; fig. 1; 14). In the Slavic assemblages the shells of mollusks of the following species were occurred: Cypraea moneta, C. pantherina, C. tigris, C. arabica. The items from Murex shells are also known. The height of Cypraea moneta is a little more than 2 cm. Other species of shells are larger reaching the height ca. 7—8 cm. The assemblages of the Martinіvka circle include Khatski (fig. 4: A) and Khittsі ones. The grave from Mokhnach belongs to the same antiquities (fig. 2: 2; 5—7). The jewellery by Martynivka circle are dated back to the second half of the 6th century, and the hoards were hidden in the middle — the third quarter of the 7th century. The Pastyrsky circle hoards include the assemblages from Zaitsevo (fig. 4: B) and Kharіvka (fig. 8—10). The hoards by Pastyrsky circle were hidden in the first half of 8th century. The appearance of the pendants from shells is related to the general trend of the spread of Cypraea moneta in Eastern Europe in the early Middle Ages. They are known in the Caucasus, Crimea, the Seversky Donets basin (fig. 11). Cypraea moneta shells were used as pendants in necklaces as evidenced by finds from the Luchiste burial ground from Crimea. The use of other types of shells remains unclear. However, they were probably parts of necklaces or amulets.
Luka-Kavetchyna的吊坠,住所25(图2:1;3)是最早的发现从斯拉夫人的遗址可以追溯到第二季度- 5世纪末。装饰品是由Murex属的贝壳制成的,是cherniakh文化的“遗产”。在该文化地区,已知由该属贝壳制成的吊坠(O. Hopkalo的2型)。从6世纪下半叶开始,斯拉夫人就开始使用贝壳吊坠。它们的品种一直使用到8世纪上半叶,尽管它们的组合和发现很少(表1;图1;14)。在斯拉夫组合中,出现了以下种类的软体动物的壳:Cypraea moneta, C. pantherina, C. tigris, C. arabica。Murex贝壳上的物品也很有名。Cypraea moneta的高度为2厘米多一点。其他种类的贝壳更大,高达约7-8厘米。martinvka圈的组合包括Khatski(图4:A)和khitts_(图4:A)。Mokhnach的坟墓属于同样的文物(图2:2;5 - 7)。马蒂尼夫卡圆环的珠宝可以追溯到6世纪下半叶,而这些珠宝藏在7世纪中期,也就是3 / 4世纪。Pastyrsky圈层包括Zaitsevo(图4:B)和khar vka(图8-10)的组合。帕斯特尔斯基圈的储藏藏于8世纪上半叶。贝壳垂饰的出现与中世纪早期塞浦路斯在东欧传播的大趋势有关。它们在高加索、克里米亚、塞弗斯基-顿涅茨盆地(图11)都很有名。从克里米亚的Luchiste墓地发现的证据表明,Cypraea moneta贝壳被用作项链的吊坠。其他类型炮弹的用途尚不清楚。然而,它们可能是项链或护身符的一部分。
{"title":"DECORATIONS FROM SHELLS IN THE ADORNMENTS OF EARLY MEDIEVAL SLAVS","authors":"Y. V. Volodarets-Urbanovіch","doi":"10.37445/adiu.2021.03.16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2021.03.16","url":null,"abstract":"The pendant from Luka-Kavetchyna, dwelling 25 (fig. 2: 1; 3) is the earliest find from the Slavs sites da­ting to the second quarter — the end of the 5th century. The adornment was made of a shell of the genus Murex and is the «legacy» from the Cherniakhіv culture. In the area of that culture are known the pendants made of shells of this genus (type 2 by O. Hopkalo). \u0000The pendants from shells appear in use of the Slavs since the second half of the 6th century. Their varieties were used until the first half of the 8th century, although the assemblages and finds with them are few (table 1; fig. 1; 14). In the Slavic assemblages the shells of mollusks of the following species were occurred: Cypraea moneta, C. pantherina, C. tigris, C. arabica. The items from Murex shells are also known. The height of Cypraea moneta is a little more than 2 cm. Other species of shells are larger reaching the height ca. 7—8 cm. \u0000The assemblages of the Martinіvka circle include Khatski (fig. 4: A) and Khittsі ones. The grave from Mokhnach belongs to the same antiquities (fig. 2: 2; 5—7). The jewellery by Martynivka circle are dated back to the second half of the 6th century, and the hoards were hidden in the middle — the third quarter of the 7th century. The Pastyrsky circle hoards include the assemblages from Zaitsevo (fig. 4: B) and Kharіvka (fig. 8—10). The hoards by Pastyrsky circle were hidden in the first half of 8th century. \u0000The appearance of the pendants from shells is related to the general trend of the spread of Cypraea moneta in Eastern Europe in the early Middle Ages. They are known in the Caucasus, Crimea, the Seversky Donets basin (fig. 11). Cypraea moneta shells were used as pendants in necklaces as evidenced by finds from the Luchiste burial ground from Crimea. The use of other types of shells remains unclear. However, they were probably parts of necklaces or amulets.","PeriodicalId":406948,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125130344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1