{"title":"Great Audiences “absorb, adopt it”: Walt Whitman’s “The Old Bowery”","authors":"Catherine Waitinas","doi":"10.13008/0737-0679.2319","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13008/0737-0679.2319","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42233,"journal":{"name":"WALT WHITMAN QUARTERLY REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2019-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45979084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Laurence Hutton and a Newly Recovered Photograph of Walt Whitman","authors":"Roselee Robinson","doi":"10.13008/0737-0679.2320","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13008/0737-0679.2320","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42233,"journal":{"name":"WALT WHITMAN QUARTERLY REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2019-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41340511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kevin McMullen, Jason J. Stacy, Stefan Schöberlein
{"title":"Walt Whitman at the Aurora: A Model for Journalistic Attribution","authors":"Kevin McMullen, Jason J. Stacy, Stefan Schöberlein","doi":"10.13008/0737-0679.2362","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13008/0737-0679.2362","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42233,"journal":{"name":"WALT WHITMAN QUARTERLY REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47318623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Allott, Daniel. "Walt Whitman Built Free Verse and Freedom into His Poetry." Investor's Business Daily (March 21, 2016). [Offers a general overview of Whitman's career.]Bellis, Peter J. "Reconciliation as Sequel and Supplement: Drum-Taps and Battle-Pieces." Mickle Street Review no. 21 (Spring 2016), micklestreet.rutgers. edu. [Begins with the question, "Why does Drum-Taps require a sequel, and Battle-Pieces a supplement?," and goes on to note how Whitman and Herman Melville "could simply have ended their books with the close of Civil War hostilities," but both felt "something more" was needed "to give the war shape and meaning: an additional movement toward reunification and reconciliation," though both supplements brought "formal disruption" as "reconciliation is deferred or displaced into a separate section of the text and marked by an all too visible scar or seam"; goes on to demonstrate how "the break in Whitman's text marks the point between wartime conflict and postwar reconciliation, a necessary pivot in what he comes to see as a single temporal and psychological process," while for Melville, "reconciliation is blocked by the politicized struggle of Reconstruction, a discursive shift that leaves the volume not so much temporally incomplete as structurally flawed" ("Whitman sees reconciliation as a task that poetry can still accomplish, given time; Melville fears that it may lie beyond the reach of discourse altogether"); concludes by observing that, "nearly 150 years later, it is all too clear that Melville, not Whitman, was the more prescient, for the tasks of reconciliation and reunification still remain."]Bennett, Joe. "Finding Walt's Wisdom amid the Jakes." Dominion Post [Wellington, New Zealand] (February 10, 2016). [Recounts the experience of reading Whitman's poetry while on the toilet, finding an insect crawling on the page, quelling the instinct to kill it, and realizing that "letting the creature be" was consistent with Whitman's message.]Black, Christopher Allan. "Lincoln's Revolutionary Rhetoric in Doris Kearns Goodwin's Team of Rivals and the Historiographic Elegies of Walt Whitman." Philological Review 39 (2013), 53-83. [Examines how Doris Kearns Goodwin's Team of Rivals and Whitman's Memories of President Lincoln both "paint a heroic picture of the sixteenth president as the political savior of antebellum American society," "analyze Lincoln's rise to power in the antebellum era and his ability to maintain the integrity of the union," "view Lincoln as a martyr who was sacrificed to heal the wounds of a divided country," and portray "Lincoln as possessing an almost mystical command of rhetoric that caused individuals of different political backgrounds to reconcile their differences"; concludes that, "unlike the historian, Whitman's role as national elegist was to reflect the sentiment of the American public towards the President during his time," while "Goodwin's narrative deconstructs the accepted image of Lincoln by offering
Allott,丹尼尔。"惠特曼将自由诗和自由融入他的诗歌"《投资者商报》(2016年3月21日)惠特曼职业生涯概览。彼得·J·贝利斯。“和解作为续作和补充:鼓号和战斗片段。”米克尔街评论第1期21(春季)，米克尔斯特，罗格斯大学。edu。[以问题开始，“为什么《Drum-Taps》需要续集，而《Battle-Pieces》需要补充?他接着指出，惠特曼和赫尔曼·梅尔维尔(Herman Melville)“本可以简单地以内战敌对状态的结束结束他们的作品”，但他们都觉得需要“更多的东西”来“赋予战争形态和意义:一场走向统一与和解的额外运动”，尽管这两种补充都带来了“形式上的破坏”，因为“和解被推迟或取代到文本的一个单独部分，并以一个非常明显的伤疤或接缝为标志”;继续演示如何“在惠特曼的文本标记点在战时和战后和解冲突,一个必要的主在他眼中一个时间和心理过程,“而对于梅尔维尔,“和解被重建的政治化的斗争,与其说散漫的转变让体积暂时不完整的结构性缺陷”(“惠特曼认为和解是诗歌仍然可以完成一个任务,给定的时间;梅尔维尔担心它可能完全超出了话语的范围”);他总结道:“近150年后，很明显，梅尔维尔比惠特曼更有先见之明，因为和解与统一的任务仍然存在。”班纳特),乔。"在杰克群中寻找沃尔特的智慧"《多米尼加邮报》[惠灵顿，新西兰](2016年2月10日)。[叙述了在上厕所时阅读惠特曼诗歌的经历，发现一只昆虫在纸上爬行，抑制了杀死它的本能，并意识到“让生物自由”与惠特曼的信息是一致的。布莱克，克里斯托弗·艾伦。"多丽丝·卡恩斯·古德温的《对手团队》中林肯的革命修辞和沃尔特·惠特曼的历史挽歌"语言学评论39(2013)，53-83。[研究了多丽丝·科恩斯·古德温的《对手团队》和惠特曼的《林肯总统的回忆》是如何“描绘了第16任总统作为内战前美国社会的政治救世主的英雄形象”，“分析了林肯在战前时代的崛起以及他维护联邦完整性的能力”，“将林肯视为为治愈分裂国家的创伤而牺牲的烈士”。并将林肯描述为拥有一种近乎神秘的修辞能力，使不同政治背景的人能够调和他们的分歧;结论是，“与历史学家不同，惠特曼作为国家挽歌家的角色是反映美国公众对他那个时代的总统的情绪”，而“古德温的叙述解构了林肯的公认形象，向公众提供了林肯作为一个有原则的道德领袖的形象，他在当时的紧迫政治问题上深感矛盾。”Michael J. Boorse主编:《对话》(2015-16冬季版)。[沃尔特·惠特曼协会通讯，新泽西州卡姆登，有协会活动的新闻，“惠特曼在战争”的时间轴(这期的时间轴从1864年12月5日到1865年12月6日)，还有一篇文章，在这个参考书目中单独列出。亚当·C·布拉德福德。《书的化身:沃尔特·惠特曼的鼓声悼念》米克尔街评论第1期米克尔斯特街21号(2016年春季)。rutgers.edu。[研究了内战时期的哀悼习俗，并注意到许多阵亡士兵的家庭成员从未能够取回他们亲人的尸体，从而剥夺了他们参加传统哀悼仪式的机会;认为《鼓号奏乐》是惠特曼试图“通过一本书来调解悲伤，培养成功的哀悼……”不仅表现了死者，还让读者想象自己通过书页与他们重新联系在一起。”这一过程之所以成为可能，是因为惠特曼“奇怪地缺乏细节，并通过精心设计的材料结构，包括装订、排版和视觉装饰，来表现任何一位内战中阵亡的士兵。”这样就促成了“一个哀悼的协作过程，从本质上讲，这将创造一个‘读者’哀悼者的社区，尽管地理、政治或意识形态的距离不同，”正如这些读者对惠特曼的“匿名士兵形象”所做的那样。…
{"title":"Walt Whitman: A Current Bibliography","authors":"Ed Folsom","doi":"10.13008/0737-0679.2323","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13008/0737-0679.2323","url":null,"abstract":"Allott, Daniel. \"Walt Whitman Built Free Verse and Freedom into His Poetry.\" Investor's Business Daily (March 21, 2016). [Offers a general overview of Whitman's career.]Bellis, Peter J. \"Reconciliation as Sequel and Supplement: Drum-Taps and Battle-Pieces.\" Mickle Street Review no. 21 (Spring 2016), micklestreet.rutgers. edu. [Begins with the question, \"Why does Drum-Taps require a sequel, and Battle-Pieces a supplement?,\" and goes on to note how Whitman and Herman Melville \"could simply have ended their books with the close of Civil War hostilities,\" but both felt \"something more\" was needed \"to give the war shape and meaning: an additional movement toward reunification and reconciliation,\" though both supplements brought \"formal disruption\" as \"reconciliation is deferred or displaced into a separate section of the text and marked by an all too visible scar or seam\"; goes on to demonstrate how \"the break in Whitman's text marks the point between wartime conflict and postwar reconciliation, a necessary pivot in what he comes to see as a single temporal and psychological process,\" while for Melville, \"reconciliation is blocked by the politicized struggle of Reconstruction, a discursive shift that leaves the volume not so much temporally incomplete as structurally flawed\" (\"Whitman sees reconciliation as a task that poetry can still accomplish, given time; Melville fears that it may lie beyond the reach of discourse altogether\"); concludes by observing that, \"nearly 150 years later, it is all too clear that Melville, not Whitman, was the more prescient, for the tasks of reconciliation and reunification still remain.\"]Bennett, Joe. \"Finding Walt's Wisdom amid the Jakes.\" Dominion Post [Wellington, New Zealand] (February 10, 2016). [Recounts the experience of reading Whitman's poetry while on the toilet, finding an insect crawling on the page, quelling the instinct to kill it, and realizing that \"letting the creature be\" was consistent with Whitman's message.]Black, Christopher Allan. \"Lincoln's Revolutionary Rhetoric in Doris Kearns Goodwin's Team of Rivals and the Historiographic Elegies of Walt Whitman.\" Philological Review 39 (2013), 53-83. [Examines how Doris Kearns Goodwin's Team of Rivals and Whitman's Memories of President Lincoln both \"paint a heroic picture of the sixteenth president as the political savior of antebellum American society,\" \"analyze Lincoln's rise to power in the antebellum era and his ability to maintain the integrity of the union,\" \"view Lincoln as a martyr who was sacrificed to heal the wounds of a divided country,\" and portray \"Lincoln as possessing an almost mystical command of rhetoric that caused individuals of different political backgrounds to reconcile their differences\"; concludes that, \"unlike the historian, Whitman's role as national elegist was to reflect the sentiment of the American public towards the President during his time,\" while \"Goodwin's narrative deconstructs the accepted image of Lincoln by offering","PeriodicalId":42233,"journal":{"name":"WALT WHITMAN QUARTERLY REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66479014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Walt Whitman: A Current Bibliography","authors":"Ed Folsom","doi":"10.13008/0737-0679.2342","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13008/0737-0679.2342","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42233,"journal":{"name":"WALT WHITMAN QUARTERLY REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47929838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Who Is “W.”?: Questions about Whitman’s First Known Piece of Published Journalism","authors":"Nick Hentoff, Ed Folsom","doi":"10.13008/0737-0679.2363","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13008/0737-0679.2363","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42233,"journal":{"name":"WALT WHITMAN QUARTERLY REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66479805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“This Damned Act”: Walt Whitman and the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850","authors":"Kevin McMullen","doi":"10.13008/0737-0679.2358","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13008/0737-0679.2358","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42233,"journal":{"name":"WALT WHITMAN QUARTERLY REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66479591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：