首页 > 最新文献

Problems of slavonic studies最新文献

英文 中文
Political Rusynism in Croatia 克罗地亚的政治分裂主义
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.30970/sls.2020.69.3497
Mykola Nahirny
Background: Historiography has long debated the identity of the terms “Ruthenian” and “Ukrainian”. It is obvious that “the Ruthenian” is the historical name of the modern name “the Ukrainian”. However, there are still theories that try to justify the separation of the Ruthenians and the Ukrainians, to recognize the Ruthenians as a separate nation – that is, they promote the ideas of political Rusynism (Ruthenianism). Ukraine's neighbors use a Ruthenian question for their own purposes, primarily to separate the Ruthenians from the Ukrainians in order to assimilate them more quickly. The Ruthenian-Ukrainian community in Croatia did not escape such a problem. The question of political Rusynism is well covered in historiography. However, there are almost no works about political Rusynism in Croatia. Purpose: Consideration of the origin and development of the ideas of political Ruthenianism among immigrants from Ukrainian lands in Croatia and the impact of these ideas on the prospects for the development and existence of both national groups - both Ruthenians and Ukrainians. Results: An immigrants from Ukrainian lands who came to Croatia in the middle of the 18th century identified themselves as the Ruthenians; those who moved here from the end of the 19th century called themselves as the Ukrainians. On the eve of the First World War, russophile tendencies prevailed among the Ruthenians. During the interwar period, contacts between Ukrainian emigrants of various migration waves strengthened. This fact contributed to the spread of the self-name “the Ukrainians”, which coexisted with the name “the Ruthenians”. Post-war attempts to unite the Ruthenians and the Ukrainians into one nationality were unsuccessful. The Yugoslav authorities deliberately separated the Ruthenians and the Ukrainians, and contributed to the formation of the Ruthenian national consciousness. The situation in Croatia was different. Here, the interests of the two ethnic groups were expressed by the Union of Ruthenians and Ukrainians of Croatia (SRiU). The position of the SRiU was that the Ruthenians were traditional, and the Ukrainians were the actual name of the same nation. But there was resistance to such a policy of the Union among the Ruthenians in Croatia. Conservative Ruthenians sought to maintain a certain distance from the Ukrainians. In particular, they held separate festivals, “summer schools” for young people, and used the wording “the Ruthenians and Ukrainians” instead of “the Ruthenians-Ukrainians”. The reason for the recent rise of Ruthenian separatism was the policy of the Croatian government. At the beginning of the 21st century, Croatia, under pressure from the West, adopted a number of pieces of legislation to strengthen the rights of national minorities. The new legislation gave great rights to national minorities (separately to the Ruthenians and separately to the Ukrainians), which leveled the long-standing common policy of the Ruthenian-Ukrainian community. The
背景:历史学界长期以来一直在争论“鲁塞尼亚”和“乌克兰”这两个词的身份。很明显,“鲁塞尼亚人”是现代名称“乌克兰人”的历史名称。然而,仍然有一些理论试图为鲁塞尼亚人和乌克兰人的分离辩护,承认鲁塞尼亚人是一个独立的国家- -即他们提倡政治鲁塞尼亚主义(鲁塞尼亚主义)的思想。乌克兰的邻国为了自己的目的而使用鲁塞尼亚问题,主要是为了将鲁塞尼亚人和乌克兰人区分开来,以便更快地同化他们。克罗地亚的鲁塞尼亚-乌克兰社区也没有逃脱这样的问题。政治上的俄罗斯主义问题在史学中有很好的论述。然而,克罗地亚几乎没有关于政治主义的作品。目的:审议来自克罗地亚乌克兰土地的移民中政治鲁塞尼亚主义思想的起源和发展,以及这些思想对鲁塞尼亚人和乌克兰人这两个民族群体的发展和存在前景的影响。结果:18世纪中叶从乌克兰来到克罗地亚的移民认为自己是鲁塞尼亚人;那些从19世纪末搬到这里的人称自己为乌克兰人。在第一次世界大战前夕,亲俄倾向在鲁塞尼亚盛行。在两次世界大战之间,各种移民浪潮的乌克兰移民之间的联系加强了。这一事实促成了“乌克兰人”这一自称的传播,这一自称与“鲁塞尼亚人”共存。战后试图将鲁塞尼亚人和乌克兰人统一为一个民族的努力没有成功。南斯拉夫当局故意将鲁塞尼亚人和乌克兰人分开,并促成了鲁塞尼亚民族意识的形成。克罗地亚的情况则不同。在这方面,克罗地亚的鲁塞尼亚人和乌克兰人联盟(SRiU)表达了这两个民族的利益。SRiU的立场是,鲁塞尼亚人是传统的,而乌克兰人是同一个民族的实际名称。但是,克罗地亚境内的鲁塞尼亚人反对欧盟的这种政策。保守的鲁塞尼亚人试图与乌克兰人保持一定的距离。特别是,他们分别举办节日,为年轻人举办“暑期学校”,并使用“鲁塞尼亚人和乌克兰人”而不是“鲁塞尼亚人-乌克兰人”的措辞。鲁塞尼亚分离主义最近抬头的原因是克罗地亚政府的政策。21世纪初,克罗地亚在西方的压力下,通过了一些加强少数民族权利的立法。新的立法给予少数民族(分别给予鲁塞尼亚人和乌克兰人)很大的权利,使鲁塞尼亚-乌克兰社区长期以来的共同政策变得平等。联盟内部的争端导致其分裂,并形成了几个独立的鲁塞尼亚和乌克兰组织。鲁塞尼亚社区提倡维护鲁塞尼亚人的民族认同,认为乌克兰不是他们的家园。由于国家的支持,克罗地亚的鲁塞尼亚人出版了关于他们散居海外的生活的回忆录,却没有提到乌克兰人。克罗地亚政治上的鲁塞尼亚主义活动家指责乌克兰同化鲁塞尼亚人,否认鲁塞尼亚人和乌克兰人有亲缘关系。对鲁塞尼亚语文的看法也作了修订。据信,其基础更接近具有乌克兰特色的东斯洛伐克方言。与乌克兰人的分界并没有阻止鲁塞尼亚人在克罗地亚的同化。半个世纪以来,它们的数量一直在稳步下降。与此同时,鲁塞尼亚少数民族正在老龄化,其平均年龄为50岁。因此,鲁塞尼亚人之间加速同化的过程和缺乏一个他们可以期待的“母国”不仅威胁到鲁塞尼亚分离主义思想在大多数鲁塞尼亚人中长期占据主导地位,而且威胁到他们作为少数民族的生存。如果克罗地亚的鲁塞尼亚人为了拯救他们的社区而决定与乌克兰人重新统一,那么即使在这种情况下,克罗地亚的政治鲁塞尼亚主义也没有存在的前景。关键词:克罗地亚,鲁塞尼亚人,乌克兰人,政治鲁塞尼主义,同化,克罗地亚共和国鲁塞尼亚人联盟。
{"title":"Political Rusynism in Croatia","authors":"Mykola Nahirny","doi":"10.30970/sls.2020.69.3497","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30970/sls.2020.69.3497","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Historiography has long debated the identity of the terms “Ruthenian” and “Ukrainian”. It is obvious that “the Ruthenian” is the historical name of the modern name “the Ukrainian”. However, there are still theories that try to justify the separation of the Ruthenians and the Ukrainians, to recognize the Ruthenians as a separate nation – that is, they promote the ideas of political Rusynism (Ruthenianism). Ukraine's neighbors use a Ruthenian question for their own purposes, primarily to separate the Ruthenians from the Ukrainians in order to assimilate them more quickly. The Ruthenian-Ukrainian community in Croatia did not escape such a problem. The question of political Rusynism is well covered in historiography. However, there are almost no works about political Rusynism in Croatia. Purpose: Consideration of the origin and development of the ideas of political Ruthenianism among immigrants from Ukrainian lands in Croatia and the impact of these ideas on the prospects for the development and existence of both national groups - both Ruthenians and Ukrainians. Results: An immigrants from Ukrainian lands who came to Croatia in the middle of the 18th century identified themselves as the Ruthenians; those who moved here from the end of the 19th century called themselves as the Ukrainians. On the eve of the First World War, russophile tendencies prevailed among the Ruthenians. During the interwar period, contacts between Ukrainian emigrants of various migration waves strengthened. This fact contributed to the spread of the self-name “the Ukrainians”, which coexisted with the name “the Ruthenians”. Post-war attempts to unite the Ruthenians and the Ukrainians into one nationality were unsuccessful. The Yugoslav authorities deliberately separated the Ruthenians and the Ukrainians, and contributed to the formation of the Ruthenian national consciousness. The situation in Croatia was different. Here, the interests of the two ethnic groups were expressed by the Union of Ruthenians and Ukrainians of Croatia (SRiU). The position of the SRiU was that the Ruthenians were traditional, and the Ukrainians were the actual name of the same nation. But there was resistance to such a policy of the Union among the Ruthenians in Croatia. Conservative Ruthenians sought to maintain a certain distance from the Ukrainians. In particular, they held separate festivals, “summer schools” for young people, and used the wording “the Ruthenians and Ukrainians” instead of “the Ruthenians-Ukrainians”. The reason for the recent rise of Ruthenian separatism was the policy of the Croatian government. At the beginning of the 21st century, Croatia, under pressure from the West, adopted a number of pieces of legislation to strengthen the rights of national minorities. The new legislation gave great rights to national minorities (separately to the Ruthenians and separately to the Ukrainians), which leveled the long-standing common policy of the Ruthenian-Ukrainian community. The","PeriodicalId":422873,"journal":{"name":"Problems of slavonic studies","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132086932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Central european literary cosmopolitanism: “Encyclopedia of the dead” by Danilo Kish and “Museum of unconditional surrender” by Dubravka Ugreshich 中欧文学世界主义:达尼洛·基什的《死者百科全书》和杜布拉夫卡·乌格雷什的《无条件投降博物馆》
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.30970/sls.2021.70.3749
Maryna Hohulia
Background: This work compares the story Encyclopedia of the Dead by Danilo Kiš and novel The Museum of Unconditional Surrender by Dubravka Ugrešić which were written outside the homeland of their authors. It is used the definition of the literary cosmopolitanism as a kind of cultural cosmopolitanism which is characterized raising the issue of identity of heroes in the perspective of world citizenship, often depicting the coexistence of different identities without the specifying a national one. The article studies the influence of Kiš's poetics on Ugrešić's poetics, intertextual relations in the mentioned works. Purpose: The similarity at the level of motives, symbols, worldviews, structure, genre features, artistic techniques as main characteristics of the literary cosmopolitanism is studied in this article. Results: The Central European literary cosmopolitanism in the works by Kiš and Ugrešić is reflected in narration, images and symbols, motives, quotations of the other texts with the similar, cosmopolitan themes. Here the authors set the task of preserving and reconstructing the past by the various "reservoirs of memory" such as memories, photographs, artifacts, customs. The topic of freedom is extremely relevant as a fundamental one for totalitarian and post-totalitarian societies, which is manifested here either through the censorship of memory, or through the fantastic visions of freedom from censorship. Keywords: museum, encyclopedia, library, memory, cosmopolitanism. Assman, A., 2012. Spaces of memory. Forms and transformations of cultural memory. Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr. (In Ukrainian) Birth Certificate, 2021. [online] Cornell University Press. Avialable at: https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9780801448881/birth-certificate/ [Accessed September, 6, 2021] (In English) Gvozden, V., 2002. Danilo Kiš as a Central European writer: contribution to writing and reading identity. In: B. Zieliński, ed. National and Supranational model of culture: Central Europe and the Balkan Peninsula. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza, s.83–94. (In Polish) Kiš, D., 1979. The Anatomy Lesson. Beolgrade: Nolit. (In Serbian) Kiš, D., 2008. The Book of the Love and Death. L’viv: LA “Piramida”. (In Ukrainian) Kosmos, І., 2015. Mapping of Exile in the Works of Post-Yugoslav Authors. PhD thesis. University of Zagreb. Zagreb, Croatia. (In Croatian) Miedzielski, E., 2014. Unity in difference, differences in unity. Mapping the cultural space of contemporary Croatia on the basis of Croatian prose from the pre-millennium. Poznań: Nauka i innowacje. (In Polish) Milutinović, Z., 2014. Territorial Trap: Danilo Kiš, Cultural Geography and Geopolitical Imagination. East European Politics and Societies, 28, 4 (2014), pp.715–738. (In English) Nedeljković, M., 2016. Kiš's vigilance: ethics as aesthetics in the prose of Danilo Kiš. PhD thesis. University of Westminster. London, United Kingdom. (In English) Pantić, M., 2002. The variations on a theme „D
背景:本研究比较了达尼洛·基什的小说《死亡百科全书》和杜布拉夫卡的小说《无条件投降博物馆》Ugrešić,这两部小说都是在作者的祖国之外创作的。文学世界主义的定义是一种文化世界主义,其特点是在世界公民的视角下提出英雄的身份问题,经常描述不同身份的共存,而不指定一个国家。本文研究了基什的诗学思想对Ugrešić诗学思想的影响,以及这些作品的互文关系。目的:从文学世界主义的动机、象征、世界观、结构、体裁特征、艺术手法等方面探讨世界主义文学的共性。结果:基什和Ugrešić作品中的中欧文学世界主义体现在叙事、意象和符号、动机、引用具有相似世界主义主题的其他文本等方面。在这里,作者设定了保存和重建过去的任务,通过各种“记忆水库”,如记忆,照片,文物,习俗。自由这个话题对于极权主义和后极权主义社会来说是一个非常重要的基本话题,这在这里要么通过对记忆的审查来表现,要么通过对免于审查的自由的幻想来表现。关键词:博物馆,百科全书,图书馆,记忆,世界主义。阿斯曼,A., 2012。记忆空间。文化记忆的形式与转化。基辅:Nika-Tsentr。(乌克兰语)出生证明,2021年。康奈尔大学出版社。可在:https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9780801448881/birth-certificate/[获取于2021年9月6日](英文)Gvozden, V., 2002。达尼洛·基什作为中欧作家:对写作和阅读身份的贡献。见:B. Zieliński,主编:《文化的国家与超国家模式:中欧与巴尔干半岛》。波兹纳奇:怀达夫尼和诺科威大学系统。Adama Mickiewicza, s.83-94。(波兰文)基什博士,1979年。解剖课。Beolgrade: Nolit。(塞尔维亚语)基什博士,2008。《爱与死》L 'viv: LA“皮拉米达”。(乌克兰语)Kosmos, І。, 2015年。后南斯拉夫作家作品中的流亡映射。博士论文。萨格勒布大学。克罗地亚萨格勒布。(克罗地亚文)Miedzielski, E., 2014。差异中的统一,统一中的差异。在前千年克罗地亚散文的基础上绘制当代克罗地亚的文化空间。波兹纳奇:Nauka i innowacje。(波兰语)米卢蒂诺维奇,Z., 2014。领土陷阱:达尼洛·基什,文化地理学和地缘政治想象。东欧政治与社会,28 (2014),pp.715-738。nedeljkovic, M., 2016。基什的警惕:达尼洛·基什散文中的伦理学美学。博士论文。威斯敏斯特大学。伦敦,英国。潘蒂奇,M., 2002。主题为“丹尼洛·基什和中欧”的变奏曲。见:B. Zieliński,主编:《文化的国家与超国家模式:中欧与巴尔干半岛》。波兹纳奇:怀达夫尼和诺科威大学系统。Adama Mickiewicza, 77 - 82页。(波兰文)Richter, A., 2002。丹尼尔·基什为您报道中欧。见:B. Zieliński,主编:《文化的国家与超国家模式:中欧与巴尔干半岛》。波兹纳奇:怀达夫尼和诺科威大学系统。Adama Mickiewicza,第95 - 101页。(波兰语)Iurii Andrukhovych与Dubravka的对话Ugrešić关于逃离你脚下的土地的体验,2021年[在线]。Chytomo。可在:https://chytomo.com/rozmova-iuriia-andrukhovycha-z-dubravkoiu-ugreshych-pro-dosvid-zemli-shcho-vtikaie-z-pid-nih/?fbclid=IwAR1OQgoqcQQ9-xSbn6dvwO0UX6Oc_p0U2k-wWnqTWB3nlZHR-TmLIqaJ8Mo[2018年6月1日访问](乌克兰文)Thompson, M., 2014。出生证明。贝尔格莱德:Clio,第475 - 477页。(塞尔维亚语)Ugrešić,博士,2020。无条件投降博物馆。Chernivtsi: Knyhy XXI。(乌克兰语)瓦努斯卡,K., 2009。文学公民:Dubravka Ugrešić。季刊,2009年17日。[在线]Dubravka Ugrešić。可在:https://www.dubravkaugresic.com/ writings/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/ karen - vanushkathe - quaterlydialogue .pdf[访问日期:2021年9月6日](英文)veli<e:1>科维奇,V., 2015。“朱斯塔比种族主义者”:杜布拉夫卡Ugrešić。世界主义与后南斯拉夫状态。见:L.普拉特和S.厄普斯通编的《后现代文学与种族》。剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,145 - 159页。韦利<s:1>科维奇,2019。东欧与种族:杜布拉夫卡文集中的世界主义与后南斯拉夫状态Ugrešić。见:韦利·<e:1>科维奇,V.当代文学与文化中的东欧人。伦敦:Palgrave Macmillan出版社,第167 - 186页。(英文)Vervaet, S., 2016。Ugrešić, Hemon与文学世界主义的悖论:或如何在全球化时代“世界”(后)南斯拉夫文学。:一个。
{"title":"Central european literary cosmopolitanism: “Encyclopedia of the dead” by Danilo Kish and “Museum of unconditional surrender” by Dubravka Ugreshich","authors":"Maryna Hohulia","doi":"10.30970/sls.2021.70.3749","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30970/sls.2021.70.3749","url":null,"abstract":"Background: This work compares the story Encyclopedia of the Dead by Danilo Kiš and novel The Museum of Unconditional Surrender by Dubravka Ugrešić which were written outside the homeland of their authors. It is used the definition of the literary cosmopolitanism as a kind of cultural cosmopolitanism which is characterized raising the issue of identity of heroes in the perspective of world citizenship, often depicting the coexistence of different identities without the specifying a national one. The article studies the influence of Kiš's poetics on Ugrešić's poetics, intertextual relations in the mentioned works. Purpose: The similarity at the level of motives, symbols, worldviews, structure, genre features, artistic techniques as main characteristics of the literary cosmopolitanism is studied in this article. Results: The Central European literary cosmopolitanism in the works by Kiš and Ugrešić is reflected in narration, images and symbols, motives, quotations of the other texts with the similar, cosmopolitan themes. Here the authors set the task of preserving and reconstructing the past by the various \"reservoirs of memory\" such as memories, photographs, artifacts, customs. The topic of freedom is extremely relevant as a fundamental one for totalitarian and post-totalitarian societies, which is manifested here either through the censorship of memory, or through the fantastic visions of freedom from censorship. Keywords: museum, encyclopedia, library, memory, cosmopolitanism. Assman, A., 2012. Spaces of memory. Forms and transformations of cultural memory. Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr. (In Ukrainian) Birth Certificate, 2021. [online] Cornell University Press. Avialable at: https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9780801448881/birth-certificate/ [Accessed September, 6, 2021] (In English) Gvozden, V., 2002. Danilo Kiš as a Central European writer: contribution to writing and reading identity. In: B. Zieliński, ed. National and Supranational model of culture: Central Europe and the Balkan Peninsula. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza, s.83–94. (In Polish) Kiš, D., 1979. The Anatomy Lesson. Beolgrade: Nolit. (In Serbian) Kiš, D., 2008. The Book of the Love and Death. L’viv: LA “Piramida”. (In Ukrainian) Kosmos, І., 2015. Mapping of Exile in the Works of Post-Yugoslav Authors. PhD thesis. University of Zagreb. Zagreb, Croatia. (In Croatian) Miedzielski, E., 2014. Unity in difference, differences in unity. Mapping the cultural space of contemporary Croatia on the basis of Croatian prose from the pre-millennium. Poznań: Nauka i innowacje. (In Polish) Milutinović, Z., 2014. Territorial Trap: Danilo Kiš, Cultural Geography and Geopolitical Imagination. East European Politics and Societies, 28, 4 (2014), pp.715–738. (In English) Nedeljković, M., 2016. Kiš's vigilance: ethics as aesthetics in the prose of Danilo Kiš. PhD thesis. University of Westminster. London, United Kingdom. (In English) Pantić, M., 2002. The variations on a theme „D","PeriodicalId":422873,"journal":{"name":"Problems of slavonic studies","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133742049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Empire of Rus’: prehistory and the beginnings of formation 罗斯帝国:史前史和形成的开端
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.30970/sls.2020.69.3490
Olha Shchodra
Background: The article attempts to study the processes of political consolidation of Slavic tribes in the IV–VIII centuries, to establish the main factors that influenced the formation of the early Slavic states; trace the prehistory of Rus’ and determine the beginnings of the Rus’ empire. Purpose: To identify a set of medieval sources for studying the history of the early Slavic states, to analyze the information of medieval writers about the Slavs and Rus’ people, their early state formations and titles of rulers to help establish the nature and degree of state-building processes. Analysis of written sources shows that the first reports of the early Slavic states appear in the Byzantine chronicles in the VI century during the era of the Great Migration, when large-scale migration in the Balkans formed large Slavic regions and Slavic expansion was a serious threat to the territories of the empire. Arab authors begin to mention the Slavs and Rus’ people later, in the VII–VIII centuries, during the beginning of Arab expansion within Byzantium and the development of international trade between Europe and the Arab East in which the Slavs played a leading role. According to sources the formation of Rus’ in southern Eastern Europe was preceded by the formation of large military-political associations of the Slavs - the unions of the Ants and Dulibs, Greater Croatia. Here as in the Baltic Pomerania and the Danube, they originated in the Slavic areas through which international trade routes passed. International trade contributed to the development of cities, strengthened the process of political consolidation and became an important factor in the formation of the early Slavic states and the formation of the Rus’ empire. Its territorial core was the Middle Dnieper region through which passed the routes connecting the north and south of the continent, as well as the transcontinental trade route between the European West and the Arab East. The establishment of control over water and land international routes was the main reason for the expansion of the Rus’ people which resulted in the formation of the largest European empire in the Middle Ages. Keywords: migrations of the Slavs, early Slavic states, the Ant Union, the Dulib Union, international trade routes, Rus’ people, Rus’ empire.
背景:本文试图研究4 - 8世纪斯拉夫部落的政治巩固过程,以确定影响早期斯拉夫国家形成的主要因素;追溯罗斯的史前史,确定罗斯帝国的起源。目的:为研究早期斯拉夫国家的历史确定一套中世纪的资料来源,分析中世纪作家关于斯拉夫人和罗斯人的信息,他们的早期国家形成和统治者的头衔,以帮助确定国家建设过程的性质和程度。对文字资料的分析表明,早期斯拉夫国家的第一批报告出现在公元六世纪的拜占庭编年史中,当时正值大迁徙时期,巴尔干地区的大规模移民形成了大片的斯拉夫地区,斯拉夫的扩张对帝国的领土构成了严重威胁。阿拉伯作家后来开始提到斯拉夫人和罗斯人,在七至八世纪,在阿拉伯人在拜占庭扩张的开始,以及欧洲和阿拉伯东方之间国际贸易的发展中,斯拉夫人发挥了主导作用。根据资料来源,罗斯在东南欧的形成是在斯拉夫人的大型军事政治协会- -大克罗地亚的蚂蚁和杜利布联盟- -形成之前。这里和波罗的海的波美拉尼亚和多瑙河一样,它们起源于国际贸易路线经过的斯拉夫地区。国际贸易促进了城市的发展,加强了政治巩固的进程,成为早期斯拉夫国家形成和罗斯帝国形成的重要因素。它的领土核心是第聂伯河中部地区,该地区通过连接欧洲大陆南北的路线,以及欧洲西部和阿拉伯东部之间的横贯大陆的贸易路线。建立对水陆国际航线的控制是罗斯人扩张的主要原因,这导致了中世纪欧洲最大帝国的形成。关键词:斯拉夫人的迁徙,早期斯拉夫国家,蚂蚁联盟,迪拜联盟,国际贸易路线,罗斯人,罗斯帝国。
{"title":"The Empire of Rus’: prehistory and the beginnings of formation","authors":"Olha Shchodra","doi":"10.30970/sls.2020.69.3490","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30970/sls.2020.69.3490","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The article attempts to study the processes of political consolidation of Slavic tribes in the IV–VIII centuries, to establish the main factors that influenced the formation of the early Slavic states; trace the prehistory of Rus’ and determine the beginnings of the Rus’ empire. Purpose: To identify a set of medieval sources for studying the history of the early Slavic states, to analyze the information of medieval writers about the Slavs and Rus’ people, their early state formations and titles of rulers to help establish the nature and degree of state-building processes. Analysis of written sources shows that the first reports of the early Slavic states appear in the Byzantine chronicles in the VI century during the era of the Great Migration, when large-scale migration in the Balkans formed large Slavic regions and Slavic expansion was a serious threat to the territories of the empire. Arab authors begin to mention the Slavs and Rus’ people later, in the VII–VIII centuries, during the beginning of Arab expansion within Byzantium and the development of international trade between Europe and the Arab East in which the Slavs played a leading role. According to sources the formation of Rus’ in southern Eastern Europe was preceded by the formation of large military-political associations of the Slavs - the unions of the Ants and Dulibs, Greater Croatia. Here as in the Baltic Pomerania and the Danube, they originated in the Slavic areas through which international trade routes passed. International trade contributed to the development of cities, strengthened the process of political consolidation and became an important factor in the formation of the early Slavic states and the formation of the Rus’ empire. Its territorial core was the Middle Dnieper region through which passed the routes connecting the north and south of the continent, as well as the transcontinental trade route between the European West and the Arab East. The establishment of control over water and land international routes was the main reason for the expansion of the Rus’ people which resulted in the formation of the largest European empire in the Middle Ages. Keywords: migrations of the Slavs, early Slavic states, the Ant Union, the Dulib Union, international trade routes, Rus’ people, Rus’ empire.","PeriodicalId":422873,"journal":{"name":"Problems of slavonic studies","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122541393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bulgarian-Ukrainian Relations in the Late Middle Ages in the Works of Ukrainian Scholars of the 19th–First Quarter of the 20th Century 19世纪至20世纪上半叶乌克兰学者著作中的中世纪晚期保加利亚与乌克兰关系
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.30970/sls.2021.70.3754
Igor Shpyk
Background: One of the least researched periods of Bulgarian-Ukrainian intercul-tural dialogue is late Middle Ages period. It is explained by the low number of sources and their fragmented character, and mainly by incomplete methodology of their pro-cessing, lack of respective conceptual approaches, which are still applied, despite seri-ous criticism. In the second part of the 20th century Ukrainian Slavic Studies, being under mo-nopoly influence of the Russian historiographic patterns, fully accepted the concept of the “second South Slavic influence”, artificially adapting it to the Ukrainian late Middle Ages history. Definitely it was not beneficial for it as self-sufficient processes of reli-gious and cultural relations of Ukraine-Rus with Bulgaria of the 14th–15th centuries were narrowed down only to one abstract phenomenon, which main recipient undoubt-edly was Moscow. Purpose: Modern Ukrainian researchers continue using the term “second South Slavic influence”, and this automatically makes their texts not only a bit terminologically vague, but often retranslates outdated historiographic patterns with clearly expressed myth-making elements. To finally neutralize the afore-mentioned tendency, one should refer back to the origins of our national historiography that includes alternative interpre-tations of cultural relations of Ukraine-Rus with Bulgaria and other South Slavic coun-tries in the late Middle Ages period. Their subsequent analysis is the man objective of this article. Results: Ukrainian scholars of the 19th – first quarter of the 20th century rigorous-ly studied all the aspects of Bulgarian-Ukrainian relations of the late Middle Ages peri-od known at that time. I. Franko and М. Hrushevsky contributed to these studies the most, and some of their opinions are based both on the in-depth knowledge of Ukraini-an and Bulgarian cultural and religious life, and the results of comparative analysis of the respective book and literary monuments, therefore they are still scientifically topical. At the same time, materials of all these studies, irrespective of their scientific value, is an inseparable part of Ukrainian Slavic researchers’ knowledge about the place of their cul-tural heritage within the system of interslavic relations of ancient times. Key words: Bulgaria, Ukraine-Rus, cultural relations, “second South Slavic influ-ence”, the late Middle Ages, Ukrainian Slavic Studies. Dashkevich, N., 1904. Several facts on Rus’ communication with South Slavs in Lith-uanian-Polish period of its history, including dumas. Kievan Anthology dedicated to Т. D. Florinsky. Kiev, pp.117–137. (In Russian) Franko, I. Ya., 1981. Collection of works. In 50 volumes, 30. Kyyiv: Naukova dumka. (In Ukrainian) Franko, I. Ya., 1984. Collection of works. In 50 volumes, 41. Kyyiv: Naukova dumka. (In Ukrainian) Franko, I., 1899. Apocrypha and legends from Ukrainian manuscripts. The Monu-ments of the Ukrainian-Russian Language and Literature, 2. L"viv. (In Ukrainian)
背景:保加利亚-乌克兰跨文化对话研究最少的时期之一是中世纪晚期。其原因是资料来源少,而且支离破碎,主要是处理资料的方法不完整,缺乏各自的概念方法,尽管受到严重批评,但这些方法仍在使用。20世纪下半叶的乌克兰斯拉夫研究受俄罗斯史学模式的垄断影响,完全接受了“第二次南斯拉夫影响”的概念,人为地将其与乌克兰中世纪晚期的历史相适应。14 - 15世纪,乌克兰-罗斯与保加利亚的宗教和文化关系的自给自足过程被缩小到一个抽象的现象,而主要的接受者无疑是莫斯科,这显然对它是不利的。目的:现代乌克兰研究人员继续使用“第二次南斯拉夫影响”这一术语,这自动使他们的文本不仅在术语上有点模糊,而且经常重新翻译过时的历史模式,明确表达神话制作元素。为了最终消除上述倾向,我们应该回顾一下我们国家史学的起源,其中包括对中世纪晚期乌克兰-罗斯与保加利亚和其他南斯拉夫国家的文化关系的不同解释。他们随后的分析是本文的主要目的。结果:19世纪至20世纪前25年的乌克兰学者严格研究了当时已知的中世纪晚期保加利亚-乌克兰关系的所有方面。1 . Franko和М。赫鲁晓夫斯基对这些研究的贡献最大,他们的一些观点是基于对乌克兰和保加利亚文化和宗教生活的深入了解,以及对各自的书籍和文学古迹的比较分析结果,因此它们仍然是科学的话题。与此同时,所有这些研究的材料,无论其科学价值如何,都是乌克兰斯拉夫研究人员关于其文化遗产在古代斯拉夫关系系统中的地位的知识的不可分割的一部分。关键词:保加利亚,乌克兰-罗斯,文化关系,“第二次南斯拉夫影响”,中世纪晚期,乌克兰斯拉夫研究达什科维奇,n.n。罗斯在立陶宛-波兰时期与南斯拉夫人交流的几个事实,包括杜马。献给Т的基辅选集。d . Florinsky。基辅,pp.117 - 137。(俄语)弗兰科,我。, 1981年。作品集。50卷,30卷。基辅:Naukova dumka。(乌克兰语)弗兰科,我。, 1984年。作品集。50卷,41卷。基辅:Naukova dumka。(乌克兰文)弗兰科,1899年。来自乌克兰手稿的伪经和传说。乌克兰-俄罗斯语言和文学的纪念碑,2。L“薇芙。(乌克兰文)弗兰科,1913年。乌克兰民歌研究[j]。(乌克兰文)纳图克,1906年。乌克兰人和塞尔维亚人的关系。米哈伊洛·赫鲁晓夫斯基教授的学生和支持者为庆祝他在哈利希纳(1894-1904)进行科学活动十周年而专门发表的科学文章合集。L“薇芙,pp.373 - 408。(乌克兰语)hojnack<e:1>, 1873年。在沃林地区,基辅和莫斯科的大主教塞浦路斯人的生活和活动。沃林教会杂志。非官方部分,14,[497 - 503]。(俄文)赫鲁晓夫,m.s., 1992。从乌克兰的宗教思想史来看。Kyyiv: Osvita。(乌克兰文)赫鲁晓夫,1994。乌克兰-俄罗斯的历史:vols。1-10(12本书),5-6。基辅:Naukova dumka。(乌克兰文)赫鲁晓夫,1995年。乌克兰文学史,5/1。Kyyiv: Lybid。(乌克兰文),n.y., 2007。19世纪至20世纪中期的乌克兰文学保加利亚研究:流派与人物。天津大学学报(自然科学版);sv。Kiril i Metodij”。(Іn保加利亚语)卡鲁日杰基伊,E. І。, 1878年。保存在利沃夫图书馆和档案馆的斯拉夫-俄罗斯语言和文字古迹概览。《第三届俄罗斯考古大会论文集》,1874年8月在基辅举行,第2页,213 - 321页。(俄文)克里扎诺夫斯基,g.g, 1886。1411年的Kamianets-Strumilov四重奏福音书和14 - 15世纪的Volyn方言。沃林教会杂志。非官方部分,17,第502 - 509页;18日,pp.531 - 543。(俄文)利哈乔夫,1958。研究第二次南斯拉夫人对俄国影响的若干任务。莫斯科:苏联科学院出版社。(俄文)梅山尼,s.v., 1974。乌克兰和南斯拉夫民族史诗文学的比较研究。民俗与民族志,第4期,页24 - 37。(乌克兰文)V.雷宾斯基,1891年。13世纪下半叶至16世纪末的基辅大都会大教堂。k<s:1> ev”:tipografja G. T。
{"title":"Bulgarian-Ukrainian Relations in the Late Middle Ages in the Works of Ukrainian Scholars of the 19th–First Quarter of the 20th Century","authors":"Igor Shpyk","doi":"10.30970/sls.2021.70.3754","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30970/sls.2021.70.3754","url":null,"abstract":"Background: One of the least researched periods of Bulgarian-Ukrainian intercul-tural dialogue is late Middle Ages period. It is explained by the low number of sources and their fragmented character, and mainly by incomplete methodology of their pro-cessing, lack of respective conceptual approaches, which are still applied, despite seri-ous criticism. In the second part of the 20th century Ukrainian Slavic Studies, being under mo-nopoly influence of the Russian historiographic patterns, fully accepted the concept of the “second South Slavic influence”, artificially adapting it to the Ukrainian late Middle Ages history. Definitely it was not beneficial for it as self-sufficient processes of reli-gious and cultural relations of Ukraine-Rus with Bulgaria of the 14th–15th centuries were narrowed down only to one abstract phenomenon, which main recipient undoubt-edly was Moscow. Purpose: Modern Ukrainian researchers continue using the term “second South Slavic influence”, and this automatically makes their texts not only a bit terminologically vague, but often retranslates outdated historiographic patterns with clearly expressed myth-making elements. To finally neutralize the afore-mentioned tendency, one should refer back to the origins of our national historiography that includes alternative interpre-tations of cultural relations of Ukraine-Rus with Bulgaria and other South Slavic coun-tries in the late Middle Ages period. Their subsequent analysis is the man objective of this article. Results: Ukrainian scholars of the 19th – first quarter of the 20th century rigorous-ly studied all the aspects of Bulgarian-Ukrainian relations of the late Middle Ages peri-od known at that time. I. Franko and М. Hrushevsky contributed to these studies the most, and some of their opinions are based both on the in-depth knowledge of Ukraini-an and Bulgarian cultural and religious life, and the results of comparative analysis of the respective book and literary monuments, therefore they are still scientifically topical. At the same time, materials of all these studies, irrespective of their scientific value, is an inseparable part of Ukrainian Slavic researchers’ knowledge about the place of their cul-tural heritage within the system of interslavic relations of ancient times. Key words: Bulgaria, Ukraine-Rus, cultural relations, “second South Slavic influ-ence”, the late Middle Ages, Ukrainian Slavic Studies. Dashkevich, N., 1904. Several facts on Rus’ communication with South Slavs in Lith-uanian-Polish period of its history, including dumas. Kievan Anthology dedicated to Т. D. Florinsky. Kiev, pp.117–137. (In Russian) Franko, I. Ya., 1981. Collection of works. In 50 volumes, 30. Kyyiv: Naukova dumka. (In Ukrainian) Franko, I. Ya., 1984. Collection of works. In 50 volumes, 41. Kyyiv: Naukova dumka. (In Ukrainian) Franko, I., 1899. Apocrypha and legends from Ukrainian manuscripts. The Monu-ments of the Ukrainian-Russian Language and Literature, 2. L\"viv. (In Ukrainian)","PeriodicalId":422873,"journal":{"name":"Problems of slavonic studies","volume":"128 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124240294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lusatian Folklore in the Slavic Research of the Italian Wolfango (Wolf) Giusti 意大利狼(Wolfango) Giusti的斯拉夫研究中的卢萨丁民间传说
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.30970/sls.2020.69.3487
Ya. O. Kravets
Purpose: The article is devoted to the Sorbian studies work of the Italian Slavic scholar of Lusatian origin Wolfango Giusti (1901-1980) “The Folk Lusatian Serbian Song” (1926), totally unknown in Ukrainian Slavic scholars’ circles. The author of a large number of Sorbian studies publications printed in the 1920s and 1930s in the pages of Italian Slavic editions, he became a true popularizer of Lusatian culture, and his works found a special reverberation in the research papers of authoritative Sorbian scholars. W. Giusti’s name as researcher and translator has recently been more frequently mentioned in Slavistic publications, his interest in Ukrainian poetry, esp. in the 1920s, is written about. The interest in W. Giusti’s literary legacy is linked, in particular, to his being interested in T. Shevchenko’s and M. Shashkevych’s lyrics. In the research under analysis, the Italian scholar stressed that “the soul of the Lusatian people has found its best and fullest expression in their folk song”. Also mentioned by W. Giusti were Ukrainian folk songs, rich in their multi-genre samples. Results: The paper presents a classification of the most characteristic folk songs, the classification coming to be basis-providing for the Italian scholar: W. Giusti relied on authoritative research papers, including those by the scholars K. Fiedler and B. Krawc. The Italian Slavicist acquaints us with songs of love between brother and sister, love songs about the way of life of the whole people, songs resonating with the motif of fidelity. Neither has the literary scholar bypassed the issue of the neighbouring peoples’ influence experienced by Lusatian culture, particularly that of a Germanic culture, providing some examples of a “spiritual analogy” with German folk songs. W. Giusti completed his short essay by promising to offer the reader, before long, “other genres of the extremely rich Lusatian folklore”. The promise came to be fulfilled as early as the next year, in the work published under the title “Folk Lusatian Serbian Songs”. Key words: Lusatian folklore, Wolfango Giusti, folk song, motif of fidelity/infidelity, dramatic mood, classification of songs, aspects of “Wendish” folklore, Germanic influence.
目的:本文主要介绍在乌克兰斯拉夫学者圈子中完全不为人知的卢萨丁裔意大利斯拉夫学者Wolfango Giusti(1901-1980)的《卢萨丁塞尔维亚民歌》(1926)的索布族研究工作。他在20世纪20年代和30年代的意大利斯拉夫文版中出版了大量的索布族研究出版物,成为卢萨恩文化的真正普及者,他的作品在索布族权威学者的研究论文中引起了特殊的反响。W. Giusti作为研究者和翻译的名字最近在斯拉夫出版物中被更频繁地提到,他对乌克兰诗歌的兴趣,特别是在20世纪20年代,被写了出来。对W. Giusti的文学遗产的兴趣,特别是与他对T.舍甫琴科和M.沙什科维奇的歌词感兴趣有关。在分析的研究中,这位意大利学者强调,“卢萨提亚人的灵魂在他们的民歌中得到了最好和最充分的表达”。W. Giusti还提到了乌克兰民歌,丰富的多流派样本。结果:本文对最具特色的民歌进行了分类,这一分类为意大利学者提供了依据:W. Giusti依赖于包括K. Fiedler和B. Krawc学者在内的权威研究论文。意大利斯拉夫主义者让我们熟悉了兄弟姐妹之间的爱情歌曲,关于全体人民生活方式的情歌,与忠诚主题共鸣的歌曲。这位文学学者也没有回避lustian文化,特别是日耳曼文化对邻近民族的影响,并提供了一些与德国民歌“精神类比”的例子。W. Giusti在完成他的短文时承诺,不久之后将为读者提供“其他类型的极其丰富的卢萨丁民间传说”。这一承诺早在第二年就实现了,出版了《卢萨丁塞尔维亚民歌》。关键词:芦田民俗,Wolfango Giusti,民歌,忠贞母题,戏剧情绪,歌曲分类,“文迪”民俗方面,日耳曼影响
{"title":"Lusatian Folklore in the Slavic Research of the Italian Wolfango (Wolf) Giusti","authors":"Ya. O. Kravets","doi":"10.30970/sls.2020.69.3487","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30970/sls.2020.69.3487","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The article is devoted to the Sorbian studies work of the Italian Slavic scholar of Lusatian origin Wolfango Giusti (1901-1980) “The Folk Lusatian Serbian Song” (1926), totally unknown in Ukrainian Slavic scholars’ circles. The author of a large number of Sorbian studies publications printed in the 1920s and 1930s in the pages of Italian Slavic editions, he became a true popularizer of Lusatian culture, and his works found a special reverberation in the research papers of authoritative Sorbian scholars. W. Giusti’s name as researcher and translator has recently been more frequently mentioned in Slavistic publications, his interest in Ukrainian poetry, esp. in the 1920s, is written about. The interest in W. Giusti’s literary legacy is linked, in particular, to his being interested in T. Shevchenko’s and M. Shashkevych’s lyrics. In the research under analysis, the Italian scholar stressed that “the soul of the Lusatian people has found its best and fullest expression in their folk song”. Also mentioned by W. Giusti were Ukrainian folk songs, rich in their multi-genre samples. Results: The paper presents a classification of the most characteristic folk songs, the classification coming to be basis-providing for the Italian scholar: W. Giusti relied on authoritative research papers, including those by the scholars K. Fiedler and B. Krawc. The Italian Slavicist acquaints us with songs of love between brother and sister, love songs about the way of life of the whole people, songs resonating with the motif of fidelity. Neither has the literary scholar bypassed the issue of the neighbouring peoples’ influence experienced by Lusatian culture, particularly that of a Germanic culture, providing some examples of a “spiritual analogy” with German folk songs. W. Giusti completed his short essay by promising to offer the reader, before long, “other genres of the extremely rich Lusatian folklore”. The promise came to be fulfilled as early as the next year, in the work published under the title “Folk Lusatian Serbian Songs”. Key words: Lusatian folklore, Wolfango Giusti, folk song, motif of fidelity/infidelity, dramatic mood, classification of songs, aspects of “Wendish” folklore, Germanic influence.","PeriodicalId":422873,"journal":{"name":"Problems of slavonic studies","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125638013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What Rus’-Ukraina was begun with? 罗斯-乌克兰是怎么开始的?
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.30970/sls.2020.69.3491
Leontij Voitovych
Background: The Thorny problems of indo-european and Slavic ethnogenezis abandon debatable the questions of beginning of the Ukrainian ethnos and his state system. Practical absence of a traditional spring base pushed away on the second plan usual historiography methods and pulled out on the first plan a tool end proofs of the special disciplines created on his base: linguistics, onomastics, ethnography, anthropology and archaeology. But white the Ukrainian researchers from far away watch after the polemic of their neighbours, last, especially taking into account the terms of “hibrid war”. With lightness attribut these questions to beginning of 20 of century and, even, later. Purpose: In the article a realizable attempt is on the basic of the last achievements of world science to analyse Slavic ethnogenezis from appearance of the Slavic tribal unions. Community development of the se tribal unions is analysed also in the light of mone new theories of chiefdom up to her transformation in the early state of military wife type (military hovernment). Results: The consequences of this development are fixed in the first fixed undoubted report about existence the Caganat of Rus’. In the process of research the comparative analysis of development of institutes of the state of military hovernment was carried out in Slavic, Scandinavian and Centrally-Cerman arrays. The similar global analisis of these difficult processes and phenomena comes true in general first with complete realization discussions are round them on the whole as well as in separate details. The undoubted is seemed only by a general conclusion in relation to completion of these processes and transformations in the Dnepr region in the first half of 9 of Century as a result of creation of Caganat of Rus’. Key words: old indo-european association, culture of lithoidal battle-exes, German and Baltic-Slavic languare groups, tribe, chefdom, state of military hovernment, Caganat of Rus’.
背景:印欧和斯拉夫民族谱系的棘手问题使乌克兰民族起源及其国家制度的问题成为争论的焦点。由于缺乏传统的基础,第二个计划被迫放弃了通常的史学方法,在第一个计划中拿出了一个工具,证明了在他的基础上创造的特殊学科:语言学,象鼻学,民族志,人类学和考古学。但是,当远在远方的乌克兰研究人员关注邻国的争论时,尤其是考虑到“混合战争”的术语。轻松地将这些问题归结于20世纪初,甚至更晚。目的:在世界科学最新成果的基础上,从斯拉夫部落联盟的出现来分析斯拉夫民族性是一种可行的尝试。从新的酋长制度理论出发,分析了这些部落联盟的社会发展,直至其在早期军妻型(军事政府)状态下的转变。结果:这一发展的结果在第一个关于罗斯卡加纳特存在的确定无疑的报告中得到了确定。在研究过程中,对斯拉夫、斯堪的纳维亚和中德三国军事政府机构的发展进行了比较分析。对这些困难的过程和现象的类似的全局分析一般首先是真实的,围绕它们的讨论是全面的,也有单独的细节。毫无疑问,这似乎只是一个一般性的结论,与第聂伯河地区在9世纪上半叶完成的这些过程和转变有关,这是由于罗斯的卡加纳特的创建。关键词:古印欧协会,石制战争文化,日耳曼和波罗的海-斯拉夫语系,部落,酋长,军事政府国家,罗斯的卡加纳特。
{"title":"What Rus’-Ukraina was begun with?","authors":"Leontij Voitovych","doi":"10.30970/sls.2020.69.3491","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30970/sls.2020.69.3491","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Thorny problems of indo-european and Slavic ethnogenezis abandon debatable the questions of beginning of the Ukrainian ethnos and his state system. Practical absence of a traditional spring base pushed away on the second plan usual historiography methods and pulled out on the first plan a tool end proofs of the special disciplines created on his base: linguistics, onomastics, ethnography, anthropology and archaeology. But white the Ukrainian researchers from far away watch after the polemic of their neighbours, last, especially taking into account the terms of “hibrid war”. With lightness attribut these questions to beginning of 20 of century and, even, later. Purpose: In the article a realizable attempt is on the basic of the last achievements of world science to analyse Slavic ethnogenezis from appearance of the Slavic tribal unions. Community development of the se tribal unions is analysed also in the light of mone new theories of chiefdom up to her transformation in the early state of military wife type (military hovernment). Results: The consequences of this development are fixed in the first fixed undoubted report about existence the Caganat of Rus’. In the process of research the comparative analysis of development of institutes of the state of military hovernment was carried out in Slavic, Scandinavian and Centrally-Cerman arrays. The similar global analisis of these difficult processes and phenomena comes true in general first with complete realization discussions are round them on the whole as well as in separate details. The undoubted is seemed only by a general conclusion in relation to completion of these processes and transformations in the Dnepr region in the first half of 9 of Century as a result of creation of Caganat of Rus’. Key words: old indo-european association, culture of lithoidal battle-exes, German and Baltic-Slavic languare groups, tribe, chefdom, state of military hovernment, Caganat of Rus’.","PeriodicalId":422873,"journal":{"name":"Problems of slavonic studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130735093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The idea of slavic unity in the works of Alexander Solzhenitsyn 索尔仁尼琴作品中的斯拉夫统一思想
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.30970/sls.2021.70.3739
Nazar Nechesnyi
Background: Throughout the ХІХ century, Panslavism actually determined the foreign policy of the Russian Empire, and at the same time was a topic to which Russian intellectuals often referred in their works. And although in the ХХ century the ideas of Panslavism lost their significance, they did not disappear and continued to remain a topic for intellectual discussions and debates in scientific and literary circles. Thus, the Russian writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn (1918–2008) repeatedly referred to the analysis of the Slavic idea in his works, trying to find out what influence it had on the development of Russia. Purpose: Objectively cover the views of Solzhenitsyn on the idea of Slavic unity and its role in the development of Russia. It is necessary to analyze the journalistic works of O. Solzhenitsyn, in which he considered issues important to our study. Moreover, the article is an analysis of the reaction to the idea of O. Solzhenitsyn, as well as the impact of the idea on the development of Russia's intellectual environment. Results: An analysis of O. Solzhenitsyn’s works gives grounds to conclude that the theme of Slavic unity did not occupy a central place in his work. The writer considered it only in the context of his concept of the historical development of Russia. According to this concept, first the Russian Empire, and later the USSR, constantly interfered in unnecessary foreign policy adventures, ignoring domestic development. In fact, O. Solzhenitsyn mainly mentioned Panslavism in his essay “The Russian Question until the End of the Twentieth Century”, in which he gave a brief overview of Russian history. The idea of Slavic unity and its role in the history of Russia was negatively assessed by the writer, because the Russian Empire, trying to implement it, spent too many resources, which in turn had a very bad effect on the development of the Russian people. Accordingly, the author warned against repeating such mistakes in the future. However, in the works of O. Solzhenitsyn there is a certain inconsistency when it comes to the Eastern Slavs. This situation can be explained by the writer's ideological convictions as a Russian nationalist: all his proposals, including the unity of the Eastern Slavs within one state, were attempts to theoretically substantiate Russia's right to own East Slavic lands. However, Solzhenitsyn's ideas did not have a significant impact on Russian society and government, as the proposal to focus on domestic development, abandoning constant foreign policy adventures, did not correlate with the imperial character of the Russian people. Keywords: O. Solzhenitsyn, Slavic idea, Panslavism, history of Russia. Dyakov, V., 1994. On the historical and sociological concept of A. Solzhenitsyn. Social Sciences and Modernity, 1, pp.64–76. (In Russian) Dugin, A., 2000. Foundations of Geopolitics. Moscow: Vector–Eurasia. (In Russian) Nizhnikov, S., 2014. Socio-political views of A. I. Solzhenitsyn. Philosophical Sciences, 2,
背景:在整个ХІХ世纪中,泛斯拉夫主义实际上决定了俄罗斯帝国的外交政策,同时也是俄罗斯知识分子在其著作中经常提及的话题。虽然在ХХ世纪,泛斯拉夫主义的思想失去了其重要性,但它们并没有消失,而是继续成为科学和文学界知识分子讨论和辩论的话题。因此,俄罗斯作家索尔仁尼琴(Alexander Solzhenitsyn, 1918-2008)在他的作品中多次提到对斯拉夫思想的分析,试图找出它对俄罗斯的发展产生了什么影响。目的:客观地阐述索尔仁尼琴对斯拉夫统一思想的看法及其在俄罗斯发展中的作用。有必要对索尔仁尼琴的新闻作品进行分析,他在其中考虑了一些对我们的研究很重要的问题。此外,本文还分析了人们对索尔仁尼琴思想的反应,以及这一思想对俄罗斯知识环境发展的影响。结果:通过对索尔仁尼琴作品的分析,我们有理由得出这样的结论:斯拉夫统一的主题并没有在他的作品中占据中心位置。作者只是在他对俄国历史发展的概念的背景下考虑这个问题的。根据这一概念,先是俄罗斯帝国,后来是苏联,不断干涉不必要的外交政策冒险,忽视国内发展。事实上,O.索尔仁尼琴在他的文章《直到20世纪末的俄罗斯问题》中主要提到泛斯拉夫主义,他在文章中简要概述了俄罗斯的历史。作者对斯拉夫统一的思想及其在俄罗斯历史上的作用进行了负面评价,因为俄罗斯帝国试图实现它,花费了太多的资源,这反过来对俄罗斯人民的发展产生了非常糟糕的影响。因此,发件人警告今后不要再犯这种错误。然而,在索尔仁尼琴的作品中,当谈到东斯拉夫人时,有一些不一致的地方。这种情况可以用作者作为俄罗斯民族主义者的意识形态信念来解释:他的所有建议,包括将东斯拉夫人统一在一个国家内,都是试图在理论上证实俄罗斯拥有东斯拉夫人土地的权利。然而,索尔仁尼琴的思想并没有对俄罗斯社会和政府产生重大影响,因为他提出的专注于国内发展、放弃不断冒险的外交政策的建议,与俄罗斯人民的帝国性格并不相符。关键词:索尔仁尼琴,斯拉夫思想,泛斯拉夫主义,俄罗斯史Dyakov, V., 1994。论索尔仁尼琴的历史社会学概念。《社会科学与现代性》,第1期,第64 - 76页。杜金,A., 2000。地缘政治基础。莫斯科:Vector-Eurasia。(俄文)Nizhnikov, S., 2014。a·i·索尔仁尼琴的社会政治观点。哲学科学,第2期,页64 - 74。(俄文)汤普森,E., 2008。帝国的吟游诗人:俄国文学与殖民主义。基辅:Osnova。(乌克兰文)萨拉斯基纳,路易斯安那州,2008年。亚历山大•索尔仁尼琴。莫斯科:Molodaya gvardiya。(俄文)萨拉斯基纳,路易斯安那州,2010。亚历山大·索尔仁尼琴的前线命运。《公共教育》,第4期,第59 - 64页。索尔仁尼琴,A., 1995。致全俄大牧首皮门见:索尔仁尼琴,a.i.《公共主义》,1。雅罗斯拉夫尔:伏尔加,第133 - 137页。索尔仁尼琴,A., 1995。给苏联领导人的信。见:索尔仁尼琴,a.i.《公共主义》,1。雅罗斯拉夫尔:伏尔加,第148 - 186页。(俄文)索尔仁尼琴,A., 1995。我们如何装备俄罗斯?见:索尔仁尼琴,a.i.《公共主义》,1。雅罗斯拉夫尔:伏尔加出版社,第538 - 598页。索尔仁尼琴,A., 1995。20世纪末的俄国问题。见:索尔仁尼琴,a.i.《公共主义》,1。雅罗斯拉夫尔:伏尔加,第616 - 702页。索尔仁尼琴,A., 1997。奥斯坦金诺公司的电视采访。见:索尔仁尼琴,a.i.《公共主义》,第3期。雅罗斯拉夫尔:伏尔加,第361 - 382页。索尔仁尼琴,A., 1997。《明镜》杂志对鲁道夫·奥格斯坦的采访。见:索尔仁尼琴,a.i.《公共主义》,第3期。雅罗斯拉夫尔:伏尔加,285 - 320页。索尔仁尼琴,A., 1997。接受《福布斯》杂志采访。见:索尔仁尼琴,a.i.《公共主义》,第3期。雅罗斯拉夫尔:《伏尔加》,第474 - 482页。索尔仁尼琴,A., 2003。两个磨盘磨着一粒麦子。新地理,11,页33 - 97。索尔仁尼琴,A., 2006。俄罗斯以压倒性优势获胜。莫斯科:俄罗斯人。(俄语)总统致联邦议会的贺词[在线]。俄罗斯总统。可获取:http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/messages/65418[访问日期:2021年9月20日](俄文)
{"title":"The idea of slavic unity in the works of Alexander Solzhenitsyn","authors":"Nazar Nechesnyi","doi":"10.30970/sls.2021.70.3739","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30970/sls.2021.70.3739","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Throughout the ХІХ century, Panslavism actually determined the foreign policy of the Russian Empire, and at the same time was a topic to which Russian intellectuals often referred in their works. And although in the ХХ century the ideas of Panslavism lost their significance, they did not disappear and continued to remain a topic for intellectual discussions and debates in scientific and literary circles. Thus, the Russian writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn (1918–2008) repeatedly referred to the analysis of the Slavic idea in his works, trying to find out what influence it had on the development of Russia. Purpose: Objectively cover the views of Solzhenitsyn on the idea of Slavic unity and its role in the development of Russia. It is necessary to analyze the journalistic works of O. Solzhenitsyn, in which he considered issues important to our study. Moreover, the article is an analysis of the reaction to the idea of O. Solzhenitsyn, as well as the impact of the idea on the development of Russia's intellectual environment. Results: An analysis of O. Solzhenitsyn’s works gives grounds to conclude that the theme of Slavic unity did not occupy a central place in his work. The writer considered it only in the context of his concept of the historical development of Russia. According to this concept, first the Russian Empire, and later the USSR, constantly interfered in unnecessary foreign policy adventures, ignoring domestic development. In fact, O. Solzhenitsyn mainly mentioned Panslavism in his essay “The Russian Question until the End of the Twentieth Century”, in which he gave a brief overview of Russian history. The idea of Slavic unity and its role in the history of Russia was negatively assessed by the writer, because the Russian Empire, trying to implement it, spent too many resources, which in turn had a very bad effect on the development of the Russian people. Accordingly, the author warned against repeating such mistakes in the future. However, in the works of O. Solzhenitsyn there is a certain inconsistency when it comes to the Eastern Slavs. This situation can be explained by the writer's ideological convictions as a Russian nationalist: all his proposals, including the unity of the Eastern Slavs within one state, were attempts to theoretically substantiate Russia's right to own East Slavic lands. However, Solzhenitsyn's ideas did not have a significant impact on Russian society and government, as the proposal to focus on domestic development, abandoning constant foreign policy adventures, did not correlate with the imperial character of the Russian people. Keywords: O. Solzhenitsyn, Slavic idea, Panslavism, history of Russia. Dyakov, V., 1994. On the historical and sociological concept of A. Solzhenitsyn. Social Sciences and Modernity, 1, pp.64–76. (In Russian) Dugin, A., 2000. Foundations of Geopolitics. Moscow: Vector–Eurasia. (In Russian) Nizhnikov, S., 2014. Socio-political views of A. I. Solzhenitsyn. Philosophical Sciences, 2,","PeriodicalId":422873,"journal":{"name":"Problems of slavonic studies","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128787756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The influence of “The declaration on the matter of principles of the polish-ukrainian cooperation” of 1987 on the forging of bilateral relationship 1987年《关于波兰-乌克兰合作原则问题的宣言》对建立双边关系的影响
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.30970/sls.2021.70.3737
Mykola Genyk
Background The Helsinki Accords signed in 1975 set inviolability of frontiers, ensured respect for human rights and hence formed the new international situation in the East Central Europe. With the emergence of opposition movements and the crisis of so-cialist bloc and the communist ideology, the issue of the future order, interethnic rela-tions, borders and national minorities arose. Purpose The purpose of the article is to research preconditions for signing of “The Declaration on the Matter of Principles of the Polish-Ukrainian Cooperation” in 1987 and its role in paving the way for bilateral relationship. Results. On the Polish opposition initiative in 1987 “The Declaration on the Mat-ter of Principles of the Polish-Ukrainian Cooperation” was signed with representatives of the Ukrainian emigration. It supported inviolability of borders and respect for nation-al minorities’ rights. The declaration was the first agreed between Polish opposition and Ukrainian émigrés document to suggest integrated and thorough project of Polish-Ukrainian cooperation after the downfall of the Socialist Camp and the Soviet Union. Its statements developed by civil society institutions, and partly approved by the gov-ernment-in-exile, were recognized by state structures of both nations after gaining of in-dependence and became a basis of their relationship. The Declaration gave a great impe-tus to normalization of relations between independent Poland and Ukraine. Its principles were implemented in an interstate framework treaty between Ukraine and Poland in 1992 and in a joint statement about mutual understanding and unity signed on the twen-ty-first of May, 1997. Key words: the Polish-Ukrainian relations, frontiers, national minorities, the East Central Europe. Before we will be with Europe. Jerzy Stankiewicz is talking to Grzegorz Kostrzewa, 1989. Tygodnik Polski, 35. 27 sierpnia. (In Polish) Boruta, M., 2002. Free with Free, Equal with Equal. Poland and the Poles about Inde-pendence of the Eastern Neighbours of Rzeczypospolita. Kraków: ARCANA, 355 p. (In Polish) Chushak, Kh., 2011. There is no Free Poland without Free Ukraine: Ukraine and Ukrainians in the Political Thought of Polish Opposition (1976–1989). Lviv: Instytut ukrayinoznavstva im. I. Kryp’yakevycha NAN Ukrayiny; Vydavnyctvo “PAIS”. (In Ukrainian) Concerning the Issue of Polish-Ukrainian Relations [unpublished sourse], 1986. The Declaration. Samostijnyk. Visnyk nezalezhnoho ukrayins"koho slova, 4–5. J. Targalski’s Private Archive in Warsaw. (In Ukrainian) Ideological Declaration of Confederation of Independent Poland [unpublished sourse]. 1 IX 1979. Archives of the KARTA Center (AOK). Archives of the Opposition (AO). Sygn. AO IV/13.1. K. 1. Warsaw. (In Polish) Les archives de l’Institut Litteraire a Paris (AILP). Les coupures de presse (CP). 1991. Vol. 3: Kozak S. Poland and Ukraine. Paths and Impassable Roads to Mutual Understand-ing, 1991. Więź, 11–12 (XI–XII), pp.113–115. (In Polish) Małynowycz, W.,
1975年签署的《赫尔辛基协定》规定了边界的不可侵犯性,确保了对人权的尊重,从而形成了东中欧新的国际局势。随着反对运动的出现以及社会主义集团和共产主义意识形态的危机,未来秩序、种族间关系、边界和少数民族问题出现了。本文的目的是研究1987年签署“关于波兰-乌克兰合作原则问题的宣言”的先决条件及其在为双边关系铺平道路方面的作用。结果。根据1987年波兰反对派的倡议,与乌克兰移民代表签署了“关于波兰-乌克兰合作原则问题的宣言”。它支持边界不可侵犯和尊重少数民族的权利。该宣言是社会主义阵营和苏联垮台后,波兰反对派和乌克兰的<s:1> <s:1>移民和<s:1> <s:1>移民和其他组织之间达成一致的第一份文件,旨在建议波兰和乌克兰进行全面和彻底的合作。它的声明由民间社会机构制定,部分得到流亡政府的批准,在获得独立后得到两国国家结构的承认,成为两国关系的基础。《宣言》极大地推动了独立的波兰和乌克兰之间关系的正常化。其原则在1992年乌克兰和波兰之间的国家间框架条约和1997年5月21日签署的关于相互理解和团结的联合声明中得以实施。关键词:波乌关系;边疆;少数民族;在此之前,我们将关注欧洲。Jerzy Stankiewicz和Grzegorz Kostrzewa谈话,1989年。泰戈德尼克·波尔斯基,35岁。27 sierpnia。(波兰文)M. Boruta, 2002。自由配自由,平等配平等。波兰和波兰人关于波兰东部邻国独立的问题。Kraków: ARCANA, 355页(波兰文), 2011年。没有自由的乌克兰就没有自由的波兰:波兰反对派政治思想中的乌克兰和乌克兰人(1976-1989)。利沃夫:乌克兰研究所。1 . Kryp 'yakevycha南乌克兰;Vydavnyctvo“《”。(乌克兰文)关于波兰-乌克兰关系问题[未发表的资料],1986年。《宣言》。Samostijnyk。Visnyk nezalezhnoho ukukins“koho slova, 4-5”。J. Targalski在华沙的私人档案。(乌克兰文)《独立波兰联邦的意识形态宣言》[未发表的资料]。1979年9月。KARTA中心档案(AOK)。反对党档案(AO)。Sygn。AO IV / 13.1。k . 1。华沙。(波兰语)Les archives de l 'Institut Litteraire a Paris。Les coupures de presse (CP)。1991. 第三卷:科扎克。波兰和乌克兰。通往相互理解的道路和不可逾越的道路,1991年。(波兰文)Małynowycz, W., 1987。乌克兰和波兰。文化,9(480),页113 - 115。(波兰文)马尔科维茨,P., 1988。前沿。Zomorządność, 157 (4 III). Kraków, pp.3-4。(波兰文)Nykiel, W., 1990。提前警告Juliusz Mieroszewski。Pogląd, 1/2。Styczeń-luty pp.65 - 66。(波兰语)组织。miast P-Z:《独立波兰邦联的思想宣言》[未出版资料],1979,1。9Biblioteka Narodowa。确实是życia społecznego。(DŻS)。Sygn。2 .华沙。(波兰语)组织。P-Z:关于波兰-乌克兰合作原则的声明[未出版资料],1987年3月。Biblioteka Narodowa。确实是życia społecznego。Sygn。[2][波兰语]波德拉斯基K. [Skaradziński B.]。白俄罗斯人-立陶宛人-乌克兰人:我们的敌人还是兄弟?华沙:Przedświt[未发表的资料],1984。p . Kazanecki。华沙的私人档案馆。(波兰语)SamostijnykVisnyk nezalezhnoho ukukins >, koho slova[未发表的资料],1986,4-5。J. Targalski在华沙的私人档案。(乌克兰文)欧盟对少数民族组织的态度[未发表的资料]。卡尔塔中心档案(AOK)。Sygn。A/7.4.2(波兰语)边界是为我们建立的。兹比格涅夫Dudziński说话了。1990. 阿宝prostu。War-szawa, 12。3.第10节。(波兰文)《宣言:致乌克兰、白俄罗斯和立陶宛兄弟》,1985年。Vidnova。发信息给鲍思高堂另库”。stvo Suspil”。Polityka 3。B. Berdychowska的私人Ar-chive。(乌克兰文)《对扬·扎列斯基的采访》,1988年。Dialogi。Biuletyn polsko-ukraiński[未发表的来源],2-3 (11-12),P. Kazanecki在华沙的私人档案。(波兰语)对Bogumiła Berdychowska的采访[未发表的来源],华沙,9。Х。2003. (乌克兰语)对Bohdan Skaradziński, Podkowa Leśna[未发表的来源]的采访,15。82006. (乌克兰语)18日在华沙对格热戈兹·科斯特泽瓦-佐尔巴斯的采访[未发表的来源]。72009.
{"title":"The influence of “The declaration on the matter of principles of the polish-ukrainian cooperation” of 1987 on the forging of bilateral relationship","authors":"Mykola Genyk","doi":"10.30970/sls.2021.70.3737","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30970/sls.2021.70.3737","url":null,"abstract":"Background The Helsinki Accords signed in 1975 set inviolability of frontiers, ensured respect for human rights and hence formed the new international situation in the East Central Europe. With the emergence of opposition movements and the crisis of so-cialist bloc and the communist ideology, the issue of the future order, interethnic rela-tions, borders and national minorities arose. Purpose The purpose of the article is to research preconditions for signing of “The Declaration on the Matter of Principles of the Polish-Ukrainian Cooperation” in 1987 and its role in paving the way for bilateral relationship. Results. On the Polish opposition initiative in 1987 “The Declaration on the Mat-ter of Principles of the Polish-Ukrainian Cooperation” was signed with representatives of the Ukrainian emigration. It supported inviolability of borders and respect for nation-al minorities’ rights. The declaration was the first agreed between Polish opposition and Ukrainian émigrés document to suggest integrated and thorough project of Polish-Ukrainian cooperation after the downfall of the Socialist Camp and the Soviet Union. Its statements developed by civil society institutions, and partly approved by the gov-ernment-in-exile, were recognized by state structures of both nations after gaining of in-dependence and became a basis of their relationship. The Declaration gave a great impe-tus to normalization of relations between independent Poland and Ukraine. Its principles were implemented in an interstate framework treaty between Ukraine and Poland in 1992 and in a joint statement about mutual understanding and unity signed on the twen-ty-first of May, 1997. Key words: the Polish-Ukrainian relations, frontiers, national minorities, the East Central Europe. Before we will be with Europe. Jerzy Stankiewicz is talking to Grzegorz Kostrzewa, 1989. Tygodnik Polski, 35. 27 sierpnia. (In Polish) Boruta, M., 2002. Free with Free, Equal with Equal. Poland and the Poles about Inde-pendence of the Eastern Neighbours of Rzeczypospolita. Kraków: ARCANA, 355 p. (In Polish) Chushak, Kh., 2011. There is no Free Poland without Free Ukraine: Ukraine and Ukrainians in the Political Thought of Polish Opposition (1976–1989). Lviv: Instytut ukrayinoznavstva im. I. Kryp’yakevycha NAN Ukrayiny; Vydavnyctvo “PAIS”. (In Ukrainian) Concerning the Issue of Polish-Ukrainian Relations [unpublished sourse], 1986. The Declaration. Samostijnyk. Visnyk nezalezhnoho ukrayins\"koho slova, 4–5. J. Targalski’s Private Archive in Warsaw. (In Ukrainian) Ideological Declaration of Confederation of Independent Poland [unpublished sourse]. 1 IX 1979. Archives of the KARTA Center (AOK). Archives of the Opposition (AO). Sygn. AO IV/13.1. K. 1. Warsaw. (In Polish) Les archives de l’Institut Litteraire a Paris (AILP). Les coupures de presse (CP). 1991. Vol. 3: Kozak S. Poland and Ukraine. Paths and Impassable Roads to Mutual Understand-ing, 1991. Więź, 11–12 (XI–XII), pp.113–115. (In Polish) Małynowycz, W., ","PeriodicalId":422873,"journal":{"name":"Problems of slavonic studies","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131237330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
John Amos Comenius: incipience of the ecumenical worldview 约翰·阿摩司·夸美纽斯:普世世界观的开端
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.30970/sls.2020.69.3499
Viktoriya Lyubashchenko
Background: The 17th century was marked by tragic religious conflicts and the Thirty Years’ War. The polarization of the Western Church, begun by ‘The First Reformation’, was deepened during this period by the emergence of new denominations. These factors forced political and church leaders to consider more effective forms of interstate and interchurch relations. In Protestant theology was formed the ideological program of ‘The Second Reformation’, which was associated with social and scientific progress and was to prepare mankind for the Millennial Kingdom. The implementation of this program required overcoming the contradictions between the Protestant churches: therefore, the mainstream of ‘The Second Reformation’ was irenicism, which during the Thirty Years’ War went beyond the narrow confessional boundaries. Purpose: On the example of church and scientific-educational activity of a Czech thinker John Amos Comenius shows the process of search by reformers of the 17th century the ways of religious understanding. The author of the article proves rethinking by John Comenius of irenic projects in favor of the ecumenical model, which would synthesize the ideas of humanism, pacifism and religious tolerance. This model was embodied in his idea of the Universal Christianity as an integral element of social and spiritual harmony of the world. Results: The author of the article confirms the thesis that John Comenius’ ecumenical worldview was based on the spiritual tradition and ecclesiastical paradigm of the Czech Brotherhood, on scientific achievements and socio-ethical utopias of the Early Modern period, as well as on irenic projects of European reformers. Disappointed with the futility of the Colloquium Charitativum (1645), John Comenius proposed a new vision of the Universal Christianity, based on the rejection of the confessional traditions, which could not shake religious faith but instead caused theological controversy. He proposed the Universal Christianity, directed on the mutual respect of believers of different churches and their cooperation. According to John Comenius, such Universal Christianity can become a spiritual platform of religious peace. Key words: John Amos Comenius, Czech Brotherhood, ‘The Second Reformation’, irenicism, ecumenism.
背景:17世纪以悲剧性的宗教冲突和三十年战争为标志。西方教会的两极分化始于“第一次宗教改革”,并在此期间因新教派的出现而加深。这些因素迫使政治和教会领袖考虑更有效的州际和教会间关系形式。在新教神学中形成了“第二次宗教改革”的意识形态计划,这与社会和科学进步有关,并为人类的千年王国做准备。这一计划的实施需要克服新教教会之间的矛盾:因此,“第二次宗教改革”的主流是伊斯兰教,在三十年战争期间超越了狭隘的忏悔界限。目的:捷克思想家约翰·阿莫斯·夸美纽斯以教会和科学教育活动为例,展示了17世纪宗教改革家探索宗教理解方式的过程。本文的作者证明了约翰·夸美纽斯对伊雷尼项目的重新思考,赞成综合人道主义、和平主义和宗教宽容思想的普世模式。这种模式体现在他认为普世基督教是世界社会和精神和谐的一个组成部分。结果:本文的作者证实了约翰·美纽斯的普世世界观是基于捷克兄弟会的精神传统和教会范式、近代早期的科学成就和社会伦理乌托邦以及欧洲改革者的伟大计划。约翰·夸美纽斯(John Comenius)对慈善讨论会(1645年)的徒劳感到失望,他提出了一种新的普世基督教愿景,基于对忏悔传统的拒绝,这种传统不能动摇宗教信仰,反而会引起神学上的争议。他提出了普世基督教,以不同教会的信徒相互尊重和合作为指导。根据约翰·夸美纽斯的说法,这样的普世基督教可以成为宗教和平的精神平台。关键词:约翰·阿莫斯·夸美纽斯;捷克兄弟会;“第二次宗教改革”;
{"title":"John Amos Comenius: incipience of the ecumenical worldview","authors":"Viktoriya Lyubashchenko","doi":"10.30970/sls.2020.69.3499","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30970/sls.2020.69.3499","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The 17th century was marked by tragic religious conflicts and the Thirty Years’ War. The polarization of the Western Church, begun by ‘The First Reformation’, was deepened during this period by the emergence of new denominations. These factors forced political and church leaders to consider more effective forms of interstate and interchurch relations. In Protestant theology was formed the ideological program of ‘The Second Reformation’, which was associated with social and scientific progress and was to prepare mankind for the Millennial Kingdom. The implementation of this program required overcoming the contradictions between the Protestant churches: therefore, the mainstream of ‘The Second Reformation’ was irenicism, which during the Thirty Years’ War went beyond the narrow confessional boundaries. Purpose: On the example of church and scientific-educational activity of a Czech thinker John Amos Comenius shows the process of search by reformers of the 17th century the ways of religious understanding. The author of the article proves rethinking by John Comenius of irenic projects in favor of the ecumenical model, which would synthesize the ideas of humanism, pacifism and religious tolerance. This model was embodied in his idea of the Universal Christianity as an integral element of social and spiritual harmony of the world. Results: The author of the article confirms the thesis that John Comenius’ ecumenical worldview was based on the spiritual tradition and ecclesiastical paradigm of the Czech Brotherhood, on scientific achievements and socio-ethical utopias of the Early Modern period, as well as on irenic projects of European reformers. Disappointed with the futility of the Colloquium Charitativum (1645), John Comenius proposed a new vision of the Universal Christianity, based on the rejection of the confessional traditions, which could not shake religious faith but instead caused theological controversy. He proposed the Universal Christianity, directed on the mutual respect of believers of different churches and their cooperation. According to John Comenius, such Universal Christianity can become a spiritual platform of religious peace. Key words: John Amos Comenius, Czech Brotherhood, ‘The Second Reformation’, irenicism, ecumenism.","PeriodicalId":422873,"journal":{"name":"Problems of slavonic studies","volume":"5 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123726083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Childhood memory as “Natural memory” in poems by the Slovak author Ján Stacho 童年记忆是斯洛伐克作家Ján斯塔乔诗歌中的“自然记忆”
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.30970/sls.2021.70.3746
I. Dimova
Background: Ján Stacho is an eminent Slovak author (1936–1995) who first has published in 1959. Two years later he became member of the so-called Trnava group, made up of him, Ján Ondruš, Jozef Mihalkovič and Ľubomír Feldek. The group’s poet-ics and aesthetics can be found in their manifestos – “There will be a talk about chil-dren's poetry”, “There will be a talk about translation” and “There will be a talk about poetry”, the last of which is lost. Ján Ondruš’s debut book “Wedding Journey“ was first published in 1961. His poems and one of the group’s literary manifestos are the subject of the present study. Purpose: The article examines the idea of childhood memory as “natural memory”. The concept is found in the poetry of Ján Ondruš, who is part of the Slovak poetry Trnava group. His poems serve the purpose of the article – to look at the realizations of the concretists’ theoretical views in the poems of the author mentioned above. Results: The article outlines the concept of memory, which we find in the aesthetic platform of the Slovak Trnava group, specifically in their manifesto “There will be a talk about children's literature.” In this text, the authors plead for writing poetry that is not “sucked from the finger” but is “squeezed” from memory. We deduce the “uses” of memory from the texts of one of the Trnava groups’ representatives, Ján Stacho. The subject of our research is his debut poetry collection from 1961, “Wedding Journey.” In his poems, we connect memory – as childhood and natural – with the metaphor of “salt-ing the senses” and the naive, unencumbered “sensing” the world to grasp the latter. We also include an intertextual reference to the text "Memory" of another poet from the Trnava group Ján Ondruš, which representatives refer to as one of their program’s works. Key words: childhood memory, natural memory, senses, Slovak literature, Trnava group. Bílik, R., 2000. Ľubomír Feldek. Bratislava: Kalligram. (In Slovak) Bokníková, A., 2006. Trnava Group – Concretists. Bratislava: Kalligram. (In Slovak) Feldek, Ľ., 2007. The Doomed Group of Trnava. Bratislava: Columbus. (In Slovak) Gilman, R., 2005. The Drama Is Coming Now: The Theater Criticism of Richard Gilman. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. (In English) Hajko, D., 1998. Ján Stacho: Essay on the Poet Who Wanted to Read the Ciphers of Being. Bratislava: National Literary Centre. (In Slovak) Jelínek, A., 1961. Vítězslav Nezval. Praha: Czechoslovak Writers. (In Czech) Kupec, I., 1955. In Defense of Poetry. Cultural Life, 44 (10), pp.4–6. (In Slovak) Maslowski, N. and Šubrt, J., 2015. Collective Memory. Theoretical Questions. Praha: Karolinum. (In Slovak) Matejov, F., 1986. Ján Ondruš’ Poem Memory. V: Literary Views. Proceedings of Young Literary Science. Bratislava: Smena, pp.164–185. Mikula, V., 2013. “Red” Fifties in “Golden” Sixties. V: Waiting for History. Articles on Slovak Literary History. Bratislava: UK, pp.127–147. (In Slovak) Nora, P., 2004. The Global Rise o
背景:Ján斯塔乔是一位杰出的斯洛伐克作家(1936-1995),于1959年首次发表作品。两年后,他成为了所谓的特尔纳瓦小组的成员,该小组由他、Ján ondruski、Jozef mihalkovije和Ľubomír Feldek组成。这个团体的诗学和美学可以在他们的宣言中找到——“将会有一个关于儿童诗歌的讨论”,“将会有一个关于翻译的讨论”和“将会有一个关于诗歌的讨论”,最后一个已经丢失了。Ján翁德鲁斯的处女作《婚礼之旅》于1961年首次出版。他的诗歌和该团体的一个文学宣言是本研究的主题。目的:研究童年记忆是“自然记忆”的概念。这个概念可以在Ján Ondruš的诗歌中找到,他是斯洛伐克诗歌Trnava小组的一员。他的诗歌服务于本文的目的——看看具体主义者的理论观点在上述作者的诗歌中的实现。结果:本文概述了记忆的概念,我们在斯洛伐克Trnava团体的美学平台上发现了这一概念,特别是在他们的宣言“将有一个关于儿童文学的谈话”中。在这篇文章中,作者们恳求写诗不是“从手指上吮吸”,而是“从记忆中挤压”。我们从特尔纳瓦部落代表之一Ján Stacho的文字中推断出记忆的“用途”。我们的研究对象是他1961年的处女作诗集《婚礼之旅》。在他的诗中,我们将童年和自然的记忆与“感官的盐化”的隐喻和天真、无羁绊的“感知”世界联系起来,以把握后者。我们还包括对特尔纳瓦组另一位诗人Ján Ondruš的文本“记忆”的互文参考,代表们将其称为他们计划的作品之一。关键词:童年记忆,自然记忆,感官,斯洛伐克文学,特尔纳瓦族Bílik, R., 2000。Ľubomir Feldek。伯拉第斯拉瓦:Kalligram。(斯洛伐克文)Bokníková, A., 2006。特尔纳瓦集团-混凝土师。伯拉第斯拉瓦:Kalligram。(斯洛伐克语)Feldek, Ľ。, 2007年。注定灭亡的特尔纳瓦人。伯拉第斯拉瓦:哥伦布。(斯洛伐克语)R.吉尔曼,2005。戏剧来了:理查德·吉尔曼的戏剧评论。纽黑文和伦敦:耶鲁大学出版社。Hajko, D., 1998。Ján斯塔乔:想要读懂存在密码的诗人散文。布拉迪斯拉发:国家文学中心。(斯洛伐克文)Jelínek, 1961年。维特ězslav Nezval。普拉哈:捷克斯洛伐克作家。(捷克语)库佩克,1955年。为诗歌辩护。文化生活,44(10),页4 - 6。Maslowski, N.和Šubrt, J., 2015。集体记忆。理论的问题。行星齿轮:Karolinum。(斯洛伐克语)Matejov, F., 1986。Ján翁德鲁赫斯的诗记忆。V:文学观点。青年文学科学学报。布拉迪斯拉发:Smena,第164 - 185页。米库拉,V., 2013。“红色”50年代在“金色”60年代。V:等待历史。斯洛伐克文学史文章。Bratislava: UK,第127 - 147页。(斯洛伐克文)诺拉,P., 2004。记忆的全球崛起。V: Y.兹涅波尔斯基,红色。皮埃尔诺拉。记忆的地方和构建现在。索菲亚:科学与社会之家,第19 - 35页。(保加利亚文)翁德鲁什,1965年。疯狂的月亮。布拉迪斯拉发,1965年,1982年。(斯洛伐克语)翁德鲁什,亚。, 1997年。从镜子里出来。索菲亚:文学方面。(保加利亚文)普罗达诺夫,V., 2006。内存的推测。V:文化与记忆。瓦尔纳,第58 - 85页。(保加利亚文)J.斯塔乔,1961。婚礼的旅程。伯拉第斯拉瓦,1961年。(斯洛伐克文)Šimonovič, 1962年。根据婚庆之旅。年轻的创造,7(8-9),页28 - 29。(斯洛伐克)
{"title":"Childhood memory as “Natural memory” in poems by the Slovak author Ján Stacho","authors":"I. Dimova","doi":"10.30970/sls.2021.70.3746","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30970/sls.2021.70.3746","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ján Stacho is an eminent Slovak author (1936–1995) who first has published in 1959. Two years later he became member of the so-called Trnava group, made up of him, Ján Ondruš, Jozef Mihalkovič and Ľubomír Feldek. The group’s poet-ics and aesthetics can be found in their manifestos – “There will be a talk about chil-dren's poetry”, “There will be a talk about translation” and “There will be a talk about poetry”, the last of which is lost. Ján Ondruš’s debut book “Wedding Journey“ was first published in 1961. His poems and one of the group’s literary manifestos are the subject of the present study. Purpose: The article examines the idea of childhood memory as “natural memory”. The concept is found in the poetry of Ján Ondruš, who is part of the Slovak poetry Trnava group. His poems serve the purpose of the article – to look at the realizations of the concretists’ theoretical views in the poems of the author mentioned above. Results: The article outlines the concept of memory, which we find in the aesthetic platform of the Slovak Trnava group, specifically in their manifesto “There will be a talk about children's literature.” In this text, the authors plead for writing poetry that is not “sucked from the finger” but is “squeezed” from memory. We deduce the “uses” of memory from the texts of one of the Trnava groups’ representatives, Ján Stacho. The subject of our research is his debut poetry collection from 1961, “Wedding Journey.” In his poems, we connect memory – as childhood and natural – with the metaphor of “salt-ing the senses” and the naive, unencumbered “sensing” the world to grasp the latter. We also include an intertextual reference to the text \"Memory\" of another poet from the Trnava group Ján Ondruš, which representatives refer to as one of their program’s works. Key words: childhood memory, natural memory, senses, Slovak literature, Trnava group. Bílik, R., 2000. Ľubomír Feldek. Bratislava: Kalligram. (In Slovak) Bokníková, A., 2006. Trnava Group – Concretists. Bratislava: Kalligram. (In Slovak) Feldek, Ľ., 2007. The Doomed Group of Trnava. Bratislava: Columbus. (In Slovak) Gilman, R., 2005. The Drama Is Coming Now: The Theater Criticism of Richard Gilman. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. (In English) Hajko, D., 1998. Ján Stacho: Essay on the Poet Who Wanted to Read the Ciphers of Being. Bratislava: National Literary Centre. (In Slovak) Jelínek, A., 1961. Vítězslav Nezval. Praha: Czechoslovak Writers. (In Czech) Kupec, I., 1955. In Defense of Poetry. Cultural Life, 44 (10), pp.4–6. (In Slovak) Maslowski, N. and Šubrt, J., 2015. Collective Memory. Theoretical Questions. Praha: Karolinum. (In Slovak) Matejov, F., 1986. Ján Ondruš’ Poem Memory. V: Literary Views. Proceedings of Young Literary Science. Bratislava: Smena, pp.164–185. Mikula, V., 2013. “Red” Fifties in “Golden” Sixties. V: Waiting for History. Articles on Slovak Literary History. Bratislava: UK, pp.127–147. (In Slovak) Nora, P., 2004. The Global Rise o","PeriodicalId":422873,"journal":{"name":"Problems of slavonic studies","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129425068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Problems of slavonic studies
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1