To move beyond 'old economy' stimulus policies such as accelerated depreciation, we need to focus on ways to provide incentives for investment in intangible assets, such as worker training, according to Kenan Jarboe of Athena Alliance.
{"title":"Comment on Cragg and Stiglitz: Invest in Intangible Assets","authors":"K. Jarboe","doi":"10.2202/1553-3832.1852","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1852","url":null,"abstract":"To move beyond 'old economy' stimulus policies such as accelerated depreciation, we need to focus on ways to provide incentives for investment in intangible assets, such as worker training, according to Kenan Jarboe of Athena Alliance.","PeriodicalId":42390,"journal":{"name":"Economists Voice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1553-3832.1852","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68651038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
No one calls the home mortgage deduction an "individual mandate" to buy a home, so why should Obama's "mandate" to obtain health care under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) be unconstitutional, asks Edward Song of The Song Law PC.
Song Law PC的Edward Song问道，没有人认为房屋抵押贷款减免是购买房屋的“个人授权”，那么为什么奥巴马在《平价医疗法案》(ACA)下获得医疗保健的“授权”是违宪的呢?
{"title":"Comment on Pauly: The Constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act--Comparisons with the Home Mortgage Deduction","authors":"Edward Song","doi":"10.2202/1553-3832.1829","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1829","url":null,"abstract":"No one calls the home mortgage deduction an \"individual mandate\" to buy a home, so why should Obama's \"mandate\" to obtain health care under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) be unconstitutional, asks Edward Song of The Song Law PC.","PeriodicalId":42390,"journal":{"name":"Economists Voice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1553-3832.1829","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68650156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Now that we have covered the uninsured, it is time for us to put the priority on health, not health insurance, according to Darius Lakdawalla and Dana Goldman, both of the University of Southern California. The authors argue that benefits to population health are likely to be limited under the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
{"title":"Can the ACA Improve Population Health?","authors":"D. Goldman, D. Lakdawalla","doi":"10.2202/1553-3832.1814","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1814","url":null,"abstract":"Now that we have covered the uninsured, it is time for us to put the priority on health, not health insurance, according to Darius Lakdawalla and Dana Goldman, both of the University of Southern California. The authors argue that benefits to population health are likely to be limited under the Affordable Care Act (ACA).","PeriodicalId":42390,"journal":{"name":"Economists Voice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2010-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1553-3832.1814","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68649675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The case that insurance subsidies will improve health is far from compelling, according to Mark Pauly of The Wharton School at The University of Pennsylvania, and needs to be strengthened if the program is to be politically stable. The time for this conversation is now, argues Pauly.
{"title":"How Stable Are Insurance Subsidies in Health Reform?","authors":"M. Pauly","doi":"10.2202/1553-3832.1826","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1826","url":null,"abstract":"The case that insurance subsidies will improve health is far from compelling, according to Mark Pauly of The Wharton School at The University of Pennsylvania, and needs to be strengthened if the program is to be politically stable. The time for this conversation is now, argues Pauly.","PeriodicalId":42390,"journal":{"name":"Economists Voice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2010-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1553-3832.1826","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68650074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) fundamentally shifts the social contract in the U.S., according to Chapin White of the Center for Studying Health System Change.
医疗体系改革研究中心的查平·怀特认为，《平价医疗法案》(ACA)从根本上改变了美国的社会契约。
{"title":"The Health Care Reform Legislation: An Overview","authors":"Chapin White","doi":"10.2202/1553-3832.1815","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1815","url":null,"abstract":"The Affordable Care Act (ACA) fundamentally shifts the social contract in the U.S., according to Chapin White of the Center for Studying Health System Change.","PeriodicalId":42390,"journal":{"name":"Economists Voice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2010-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1553-3832.1815","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68649300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Can the health insurance exchanges in the Affordable Care Act substantially improve the functioning and reach of the private health insurance market? They can if executed correctly, according to Mark Duggan of the University of Maryland and Robert Kocher of McKinsey Center for U.S. Health System Reform, who point to new incentives for individuals, employers, and insurers.
{"title":"The Economics, Opportunities, and Challenges of Health Insurance Exchanges","authors":"M. Duggan, Robert P Kocher","doi":"10.2202/1553-3832.1818","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1818","url":null,"abstract":"Can the health insurance exchanges in the Affordable Care Act substantially improve the functioning and reach of the private health insurance market? They can if executed correctly, according to Mark Duggan of the University of Maryland and Robert Kocher of McKinsey Center for U.S. Health System Reform, who point to new incentives for individuals, employers, and insurers.","PeriodicalId":42390,"journal":{"name":"Economists Voice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2010-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1553-3832.1818","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68649553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Healthcare costs are no doubt too high, and Congress has been pushing for 13 years to harness market forces in Medicare procurement. But despite all this time, we are on the precipice of adopting a very poor market design according to Peter Cramton of University of Maryland and Brett Katzman of Kennewaw State University.
{"title":"Reducing Healthcare Costs Requires Good Market Design","authors":"P. Cramton, Brett Katzman","doi":"10.2202/1553-3832.1802","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1802","url":null,"abstract":"Healthcare costs are no doubt too high, and Congress has been pushing for 13 years to harness market forces in Medicare procurement. But despite all this time, we are on the precipice of adopting a very poor market design according to Peter Cramton of University of Maryland and Brett Katzman of Kennewaw State University.","PeriodicalId":42390,"journal":{"name":"Economists Voice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2010-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1553-3832.1802","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68648869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Professor Richardson documents redistribution from Democratic states to Republican states and links this to the 1994 "Republican revolution" -- suggesting a deliberative effort by Republicans to redistribute income towards their constituents. Seth Giertz of the University of Nebraska argues that what Professor Richardson's analysis really shows is that "red" states -- but not necessarily Republicans within those states -- are (increasingly) the major beneficiaries of federal redistributive policies -- and that "blue" states are (increasingly) the benefactors.
理查森教授记录了从民主党州到共和党州的再分配，并将其与1994年的“共和党革命”联系起来——这表明共和党人经过深思熟虑的努力，将收入再分配给他们的选民。内布拉斯加大学(University of Nebraska)的塞思·吉尔茨(Seth Giertz)认为，理查森教授的分析真正表明的是，“红色”州——但不一定是这些州的共和党人——(越来越)是联邦再分配政策的主要受益者，而“蓝色”州(越来越)是受益者。
{"title":"Comment on Richardson: Progressive Federal Taxation Drives Redistribution from Blue to Red States","authors":"Seth H. Giertz","doi":"10.2202/1553-3832.1709","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1709","url":null,"abstract":"Professor Richardson documents redistribution from Democratic states to Republican states and links this to the 1994 \"Republican revolution\" -- suggesting a deliberative effort by Republicans to redistribute income towards their constituents. Seth Giertz of the University of Nebraska argues that what Professor Richardson's analysis really shows is that \"red\" states -- but not necessarily Republicans within those states -- are (increasingly) the major beneficiaries of federal redistributive policies -- and that \"blue\" states are (increasingly) the benefactors.","PeriodicalId":42390,"journal":{"name":"Economists Voice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2010-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1553-3832.1709","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68647838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Is assigning the GAO to protect against political favoritism by the Fed like asking the fox to guard the henhouse? According to Steve Maser and Fred Thompson's work it is: they find that Congressional pressure has a large impact on GAO decision making.
{"title":"The Fox and the Henhouse: On the Wisdom of GAO Audits of the Federal Reserve","authors":"Steven M. Maser, F. Thompson","doi":"10.2202/1553-3832.1758","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1758","url":null,"abstract":"Is assigning the GAO to protect against political favoritism by the Fed like asking the fox to guard the henhouse? According to Steve Maser and Fred Thompson's work it is: they find that Congressional pressure has a large impact on GAO decision making.","PeriodicalId":42390,"journal":{"name":"Economists Voice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2010-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1553-3832.1758","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68648287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
With America desperate for jobs, now is the worst time for the Federal Communications Commission to be imposing net-neutrality and potentially scaring away billions of dollars in telecommunications investment, according to Robert Litan of the Kauffman Foundation and Brookings Institution and Hal Singer of Navigant Economics.
{"title":"Net Neutrality Is Bad Broadband Regulation","authors":"R. Litan, Hal J. Singer","doi":"10.2202/1553-3832.1777","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1777","url":null,"abstract":"With America desperate for jobs, now is the worst time for the Federal Communications Commission to be imposing net-neutrality and potentially scaring away billions of dollars in telecommunications investment, according to Robert Litan of the Kauffman Foundation and Brookings Institution and Hal Singer of Navigant Economics.","PeriodicalId":42390,"journal":{"name":"Economists Voice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2010-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1553-3832.1777","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68648370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：