Pub Date : 2016-12-09DOI: 10.1163/15718190-08434P12
Laurent Waelkens
{"title":"Los bandos de buen gobierno del Río de la Plata, Tucumán y Cuyo (época hispánica), Edición y estudio, écrit par V. Tau Anzoátegui, 2004","authors":"Laurent Waelkens","doi":"10.1163/15718190-08434P12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08434P12","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43053,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","volume":"167 1","pages":"543-545"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2016-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76641098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-12-09DOI: 10.1163/15718190-08434P10
L. Waelkens
{"title":"Summa ‘ Omnis qui iuste iudicat ’ sive lipsiensis , tom. III, In memoriam Rudolf Weigand †, adlaborantibus S. Haering, H. Hallermann, M. Petzholt [et] I.K. Grossmann, édité par P. Landau, W. Kozur [et] K. Miethaner-Vent, 2014","authors":"L. Waelkens","doi":"10.1163/15718190-08434P10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08434P10","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43053,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","volume":"21 1","pages":"539-540"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2016-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83501517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-12-09DOI: 10.1163/15718190-08434P14
T. C. Jehoram
{"title":"Developing a legal paradigm for patents: the attitude of judges to patents during the early phase of the Industrial Revolution in England (1750s – 1830s), geschreven door Helen Gubby, 2012","authors":"T. C. Jehoram","doi":"10.1163/15718190-08434P14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08434P14","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43053,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","volume":"40 1","pages":"554-555"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2016-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87067245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-12-09DOI: 10.1163/15718190-08434P02
D. Heirbaut
The ‘Saxon Mirror’ was one of the most important books of medieval law, but literature on it in other Western European languages than German, remains scarce. This article therefore wants to present the Saxon Mirror to French readers by studying its author Eike von Repgow and its content, characteristics and influence. The author also puts forward his own hypotheses concerning the Saxon Mirror. The Saxon Mirror has to be studied together with other texts which used the same material, more in particular the Auctor vetus de beneficiis , and the law book of Gorlitz. Making a comparison with texts of feudal law elsewhere, it becomes clear that the Saxon Mirror was based on notes taken by practitioners, which could be compilated in different ways. The differences between the longer and the shorter versions of the Saxon Mirror may be explained by the groups behind them. Specialists of feudal law were responsible for the shorter version, whereas the longer version was the work of aldermen. In this context, it is not unlikely that Eike von Repgow may have been a pleader in feudal courts rather than an alderman.
{"title":"Le Miroir des Saxons : un texte remarquable, mais presque inconnu dans l’historiographie française","authors":"D. Heirbaut","doi":"10.1163/15718190-08434P02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08434P02","url":null,"abstract":"The ‘Saxon Mirror’ was one of the most important books of medieval law, but literature on it in other Western European languages than German, remains scarce. This article therefore wants to present the Saxon Mirror to French readers by studying its author Eike von Repgow and its content, characteristics and influence. The author also puts forward his own hypotheses concerning the Saxon Mirror. The Saxon Mirror has to be studied together with other texts which used the same material, more in particular the Auctor vetus de beneficiis , and the law book of Gorlitz. Making a comparison with texts of feudal law elsewhere, it becomes clear that the Saxon Mirror was based on notes taken by practitioners, which could be compilated in different ways. The differences between the longer and the shorter versions of the Saxon Mirror may be explained by the groups behind them. Specialists of feudal law were responsible for the shorter version, whereas the longer version was the work of aldermen. In this context, it is not unlikely that Eike von Repgow may have been a pleader in feudal courts rather than an alderman.","PeriodicalId":43053,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","volume":"35 1","pages":"401-422"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2016-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85078053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-12-09DOI: 10.1163/15718190-08434P11
Laurent Waelkens
{"title":"Pierre Grégoire tra leges e mores, Ricerche sulla pubblicistica francese del tardo Cinquecento , écrit par Ch. Zendri, 2007","authors":"Laurent Waelkens","doi":"10.1163/15718190-08434P11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08434P11","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43053,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","volume":"2 1","pages":"541-542"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2016-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85902770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-12-09DOI: 10.1163/15718190-08434P08
Laurent Waelkens
{"title":"La riflessione medievale sulla persona giuridica: la causa pia, écrit par M.G. Fantini, 2010","authors":"Laurent Waelkens","doi":"10.1163/15718190-08434P08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08434P08","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43053,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","volume":"36 1","pages":"533-536"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2016-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78943087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-12-09DOI: 10.1163/15718190-08434P06
Jean F. Crombois
This article discusses the question of possible constitutional models in constitutional history. More precisely, it deals with the influence of the Belgian Constitution of 1831 on the Bulgarian Constitution of 1879 which is also known as the Turnovo Constitution. In doing so, this article highlights the fact that one cannot speak of a Belgian model for the Bulgarian constitution. In other words, it seems that, in this case, the Belgian constitution did not travel so well in time and space. Nevertheless, this article also argues that such a discussion should also be included in the grand narrative of constitutional history in Europe in the 19th century. Finally, the claims and counter claims of a possible Belgian model became central during the inter-War period in the discussion about the desirability or not of the establishment of a liberal parliamentary regime in Bulgaria.
{"title":"How well do constitutions travel across time and space? : The Belgian Constitution of 1831 in Bulgarian constitutional history 1879–1940","authors":"Jean F. Crombois","doi":"10.1163/15718190-08434P06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08434P06","url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the question of possible constitutional models in constitutional history. More precisely, it deals with the influence of the Belgian Constitution of 1831 on the Bulgarian Constitution of 1879 which is also known as the Turnovo Constitution. In doing so, this article highlights the fact that one cannot speak of a Belgian model for the Bulgarian constitution. In other words, it seems that, in this case, the Belgian constitution did not travel so well in time and space. Nevertheless, this article also argues that such a discussion should also be included in the grand narrative of constitutional history in Europe in the 19th century. Finally, the claims and counter claims of a possible Belgian model became central during the inter-War period in the discussion about the desirability or not of the establishment of a liberal parliamentary regime in Bulgaria.","PeriodicalId":43053,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","volume":"40 1","pages":"502-525"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2016-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78032823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-12-09DOI: 10.1163/15718190-08434p01
B. Kupisch
The principal item of the article is how to understand the meaning of the words ‘ ne a semet ipso ei [ servo ] adimatur libertas ’ as well as ‘ a semet ipso [ servus ] libertatem accipit ’, both phrases applied to a servus cum libertate heres institutus. Usual interpretations do not convince. A similar problem of understanding affects the wording ‘ sicuti legari sibi non potes t , ita nec a se adimi ’. Main question in this text: can a testator take away the freedom of a slave who is instituted as an heir by codicil? The principle of the favor libertatis implies the negative answer to this question.
本文的主要项目是如何理解“ne a semet ipso ei [servo] adimatur libertas”和“a semet ipso [servus] libertatem accipit”这两个词的含义，这两个短语都适用于一个servus和libertate heres institutus。通常的解释不能令人信服。一个类似的理解问题影响了“sicuti legari sibi non potes t, ita nec A se adimi”的措辞。本文的主要问题是:立遗嘱人能否剥夺通过遗嘱附注而成为继承人的奴隶的自由?对自由者有利的原则意味着对这个问题的否定回答。
{"title":"Der Sklave als Zwangs-Erbe, Ulpian/Julian 4 ad Sab. (D. 28,5,6,4) : Eine Nach-Lese","authors":"B. Kupisch","doi":"10.1163/15718190-08434p01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08434p01","url":null,"abstract":"The principal item of the article is how to understand the meaning of the words ‘ ne a semet ipso ei [ servo ] adimatur libertas ’ as well as ‘ a semet ipso [ servus ] libertatem accipit ’, both phrases applied to a servus cum libertate heres institutus. Usual interpretations do not convince. A similar problem of understanding affects the wording ‘ sicuti legari sibi non potes t , ita nec a se adimi ’. Main question in this text: can a testator take away the freedom of a slave who is instituted as an heir by codicil? The principle of the favor libertatis implies the negative answer to this question.","PeriodicalId":43053,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","volume":"121 1","pages":"379-400"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2016-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89470931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-12-09DOI: 10.1163/15718190-08434P05
Jan Dumolyn, M. Pajić
During the fourteenth century, the struggle for power between the craft guilds and patricians dominated the county of Flanders to such an extent that it resulted in three major revolts between 1302 and 1361. A common punishment for collective action was banishment from the city or from the entire county, either temporarily or for life. A mitigation of the capital punishment, sending those politically defeated into exile, partially transferred social and political tensions abroad and allowed the victorious party to restore order, although sometimes only until the return of the exiles under new political conditions. Thus these revolts were followed by waves of large scale collective expulsions, in the execution of which both princely and urban authorities were involved. After these, however, the importance of collective exile as a measure of repression sharply declined and other types of punishment were inflicted on rebellious communities. The purpose of this article is to explain this brief but intensive legal phenomenon within the judicial and political structures of the county.
{"title":"Enemies of the Count and of the City : The collective exile of rebels in fourteenth-century Flanders","authors":"Jan Dumolyn, M. Pajić","doi":"10.1163/15718190-08434P05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08434P05","url":null,"abstract":"During the fourteenth century, the struggle for power between the craft guilds and patricians dominated the county of Flanders to such an extent that it resulted in three major revolts between 1302 and 1361. A common punishment for collective action was banishment from the city or from the entire county, either temporarily or for life. A mitigation of the capital punishment, sending those politically defeated into exile, partially transferred social and political tensions abroad and allowed the victorious party to restore order, although sometimes only until the return of the exiles under new political conditions. Thus these revolts were followed by waves of large scale collective expulsions, in the execution of which both princely and urban authorities were involved. After these, however, the importance of collective exile as a measure of repression sharply declined and other types of punishment were inflicted on rebellious communities. The purpose of this article is to explain this brief but intensive legal phenomenon within the judicial and political structures of the county.","PeriodicalId":43053,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","volume":"39 1","pages":"461-501"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2016-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75493040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-12-09DOI: 10.1163/15718190-08434P03
H. D. Jong
In Roman and Byzantine legal literature there has been much debate about the payment ( merces /μισθός) claimed by the mandatory in D. 17,1,26,8 (B. 14,1,26,8). The reason was the requirement of gratuitousness of mandatum , which made that this case should in principle be classified as a locatio conductio /μίσθωσις. To explain the presence of merces in Roman law literature several suggestions were made: interpolation, remuneration, the existence of two contracts or a pactum adiectum . In Byzantine law literature μισθός was interpreted as the payment for the slave. These interpretations are one way or another unsatisfactory. In (early) Byzantine law a plausible new interpretation can be found. Here the payment is interpreted as expenses incurred to make the property, i.e. slave, worth more, and such expenses (for training slaves) are ‘useful’ expenses. This interpretation is plausible and applies also for classical Roman law. It shows that the use of the Basilica is of indispensable benefit to Romanists.
在罗马和拜占庭的法律文献中，关于D. 17,1,26,8 (B. 14,1,26,8)中强制性要求的支付(merces /μισθ ο ς)有很多争论。原因是训令的无端性要求，因此这种情况原则上应该归类为μ σθωσις。为了解释罗马法文献中商业契约的存在，提出了几种建议:插值、报酬、两个契约的存在或直接契约。在拜占庭法律文献中，μισθ ο ς被解释为对奴隶的支付。这些解释无论如何都不能令人满意。在(早期)拜占庭法律中，可以找到一种似是而非的新解释。在这里，报酬被解释为使财产(即奴隶)更值钱所发生的费用，而这种费用(用于训练奴隶)是“有用的”费用。这种解释是合理的，也适用于古典罗马法。这表明使用大教堂对罗马人来说是不可或缺的好处。
{"title":"The benefit to Romanists of using the Basilica : The example of B. 14,1,26,8 (D. 17,1,26,8)","authors":"H. D. Jong","doi":"10.1163/15718190-08434P03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08434P03","url":null,"abstract":"In Roman and Byzantine legal literature there has been much debate about the payment ( merces /μισθός) claimed by the mandatory in D. 17,1,26,8 (B. 14,1,26,8). The reason was the requirement of gratuitousness of mandatum , which made that this case should in principle be classified as a locatio conductio /μίσθωσις. To explain the presence of merces in Roman law literature several suggestions were made: interpolation, remuneration, the existence of two contracts or a pactum adiectum . In Byzantine law literature μισθός was interpreted as the payment for the slave. These interpretations are one way or another unsatisfactory. In (early) Byzantine law a plausible new interpretation can be found. Here the payment is interpreted as expenses incurred to make the property, i.e. slave, worth more, and such expenses (for training slaves) are ‘useful’ expenses. This interpretation is plausible and applies also for classical Roman law. It shows that the use of the Basilica is of indispensable benefit to Romanists.","PeriodicalId":43053,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","volume":"32 1","pages":"423-436"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2016-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86166620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：