Pub Date : 2021-11-30DOI: 10.19090/pp.2021.3.309-328
Vojin Simunović
Iako je odavno poznato da simbolički stimulusi mogu da budu pobuđivači emocija, dosadašnja istraživanja u oblasti socijalne kognicije (tj. teorije uma) bila su usmerena gotovo isključivo na prirodne pobuđivače. Zato smo ispitanicima različite starosti, koristeći metodu strukturisanog intervjua, postavljali pitanja o tome šta izaziva 4 osnovne (radost, strah, tuga, bes) emocije, kako bismo utvrdili kolika će biti relativna učestalost simboličkih pobuđivača u njihovim spontanim odgovorima. Relativna učestalost takvih pobuđivača uzeta je kao indikator za njihov značaj za razumevanje kauzacije emocija. Učestvovalo je ukupno 120 ispitanika, po 20 na različitim uzrastima od predškolskog do studentskog. Dobijene odgovore kategorisala su dva nezavisna procenjivača; ukupno slaganje među njima bilo je 96%. Rezultati su pokazali da su simboličke pobuđivače u visokom procentu navodili ispitanici na svim ispitivanim uzrastima. Ovaj nalaz smo protumačili kao pokazatelj toga da su takvi pobuđivači od najranijih uzrasta deo implicitne teorije o kauzaciji emocija i da je u dosadašnjim istraživanjima napravljen „propust“ time što oni nisu u većoj meri uzeti u obzir. Jedina značajna uzrasna razlika u učestalosti simboličkih pobuđivača dobijena je između dece od 5 godina (46.4%) i starijih ispitanika (65.9% u proseku), što se poklapa sa prelaskom sa predškolskog na školski uzrast. Relativna učestalost takvih pobuđivača ostaje približno ista na starijim uzrastima. Analize uzrasnih razlika u učestalosti simboličkih pobuđivača iz različitih potkategorija pokazale su da je na uzrastu od 5 godina veća učestalost ikoničkih pobuđivača nego na starijim uzrastima, dok je obrnut slučaj sa društveno-normativnim pobuđivačima; u oba slučaja, kasnije uzrasne razlike nisu statistički značajne.
{"title":"„Šta izaziva osnovne emocije?“ – učestalost simboličkih pobuđivača u odgovorima ispitanika različitog uzrasta","authors":"Vojin Simunović","doi":"10.19090/pp.2021.3.309-328","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2021.3.309-328","url":null,"abstract":"Iako je odavno poznato da simbolički stimulusi mogu da budu pobuđivači emocija, dosadašnja istraživanja u oblasti socijalne kognicije (tj. teorije uma) bila su usmerena gotovo isključivo na prirodne pobuđivače. Zato smo ispitanicima različite starosti, koristeći metodu strukturisanog intervjua, postavljali pitanja o tome šta izaziva 4 osnovne (radost, strah, tuga, bes) emocije, kako bismo utvrdili kolika će biti relativna učestalost simboličkih pobuđivača u njihovim spontanim odgovorima. Relativna učestalost takvih pobuđivača uzeta je kao indikator za njihov značaj za razumevanje kauzacije emocija. Učestvovalo je ukupno 120 ispitanika, po 20 na različitim uzrastima od predškolskog do studentskog. Dobijene odgovore kategorisala su dva nezavisna procenjivača; ukupno slaganje među njima bilo je 96%. Rezultati su pokazali da su simboličke pobuđivače u visokom procentu navodili ispitanici na svim ispitivanim uzrastima. Ovaj nalaz smo protumačili kao pokazatelj toga da su takvi pobuđivači od najranijih uzrasta deo implicitne teorije o kauzaciji emocija i da je u dosadašnjim istraživanjima napravljen „propust“ time što oni nisu u većoj meri uzeti u obzir. Jedina značajna uzrasna razlika u učestalosti simboličkih pobuđivača dobijena je između dece od 5 godina (46.4%) i starijih ispitanika (65.9% u proseku), što se poklapa sa prelaskom sa predškolskog na školski uzrast. Relativna učestalost takvih pobuđivača ostaje približno ista na starijim uzrastima. Analize uzrasnih razlika u učestalosti simboličkih pobuđivača iz različitih potkategorija pokazale su da je na uzrastu od 5 godina veća učestalost ikoničkih pobuđivača nego na starijim uzrastima, dok je obrnut slučaj sa društveno-normativnim pobuđivačima; u oba slučaja, kasnije uzrasne razlike nisu statistički značajne.","PeriodicalId":43074,"journal":{"name":"Primenjena Psihologija","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43964580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-30DOI: 10.19090/pp.2021.3.277-307
Aleksandra A. Sanader, Jelena Petrović, L. Bačanac, I. Ivković, Ivan B. Petrović, O. Knežević
Traditionally, anxiety has been interpreted as a negative emotional state characterized by nervousness, worry, fret, uncertainty and vague fear which could have an adverse effect on sports achievement. On the other hand, sport type and its specific nature and demands, may also be connected with the level of state and trait anxiety. This study aimed to investigate potential differences in the competitive trait anxiety level and general self-esteem according to gender in sports of different contact level. The sample consisted of 1024 (590 males and 434 females) young athletes. Independent variables were sport contact level (non-contact, contact and collision sports) and gender. Dependent variables were measured by the adjusted versions of Sport Competition Anxiety Test and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Basic descriptive statistics was calculated for all the groups, and the differences between them were established using χ² test and MANOVA. The results suggest significant differences in trait competitive anxiety per sport type, gender and their interaction, and no differences in the general self-esteem level. The current study reveals that not only the intensity but also the intergroup relationship of a sport contact level (non-contact, contact and collision sports) is gender determined. These findings are important in psycho-diagnostic procedure and choosing appropriate coping strategies for athletes.
{"title":"Competitive trait anxiety and general self-esteem of athletes according to the sport type and gender","authors":"Aleksandra A. Sanader, Jelena Petrović, L. Bačanac, I. Ivković, Ivan B. Petrović, O. Knežević","doi":"10.19090/pp.2021.3.277-307","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2021.3.277-307","url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, anxiety has been interpreted as a negative emotional state characterized by nervousness, worry, fret, uncertainty and vague fear which could have an adverse effect on sports achievement. On the other hand, sport type and its specific nature and demands, may also be connected with the level of state and trait anxiety. This study aimed to investigate potential differences in the competitive trait anxiety level and general self-esteem according to gender in sports of different contact level. The sample consisted of 1024 (590 males and 434 females) young athletes. Independent variables were sport contact level (non-contact, contact and collision sports) and gender. Dependent variables were measured by the adjusted versions of Sport Competition Anxiety Test and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Basic descriptive statistics was calculated for all the groups, and the differences between them were established using χ² test and MANOVA. The results suggest significant differences in trait competitive anxiety per sport type, gender and their interaction, and no differences in the general self-esteem level. The current study reveals that not only the intensity but also the intergroup relationship of a sport contact level (non-contact, contact and collision sports) is gender determined. These findings are important in psycho-diagnostic procedure and choosing appropriate coping strategies for athletes.","PeriodicalId":43074,"journal":{"name":"Primenjena Psihologija","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47767290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-30DOI: 10.19090/pp.2021.3.365-391
Anja Štraser, Olga Lukić, Bojana Bodroža
Društvene mreže predstavljaju kontekst u kom se aktivno uspostavljaju i razvijaju intimni odnosi. Zbog specifičnosti onlajn interakcije, društvene mreže su pogodno okruženje u kom se ispoljavaju i razna nelojalna partnerska ponašanja. U ovom radu ispitivane su determinante obraćanja pažnje na alternativne partnere i neverstva na društvenim mrežama, a cilj je bio da se ispita doprinos narcizma, traženja senzacija i samoprezentacije navedenim oblicima nelojalnog partnerskog ponašanja. Uz to, ispitivan je medijatorski efekat samoprezentacije i obraćanja pažnje na alternative na relaciju između osobina ličnosti i neverstva. U istraživanju su učestvovale 423 osobe koje su trenutno u intimnoj vezi (22.2% muškog pola, prosečna starost 22, raspon godina od 18 do 52 godine). Rezultati pokazuju da narcizam, traženje senzacija i samoprezentacija na društvenim mrežama daju unikatni doprinos predikciji obraćanja pažnje na alternative, dok je neverstvo unikatno povezano samo sa samoprezentacijom. Relacija narcizma i neverstva potpuno je posredovana samoprezentacijom i obraćanjem pažnje na alternative, dok je odnos traženja senzacija i neverstva posredovan samo obraćanjem pažnje na alternative. Nalazi ovog istraživanja sugerišu da je opravdano praviti konceptualnu razliku između obraćanja pažnje na alternative i neverstva, kao i da ova ova dva oblika nelojalnog partnerskog ponašanja mogu biti motivisana različitim psihološkim potrebama.
社交网络是一种积极建立和发展亲密关系的环境。由于在线互动的特殊性,社交网络是一个暴露不同不良伙伴关系的合适环境。在这项工作中,研究了关注替代伴侣的决定因素和社交网络上的劣势,目的是检验自恋、感觉和自我监控对非法伴侣形式的贡献。Uz to,ispitivan je medijatorski efekat samoprezentacije i obraćanja pažnje na alternative na relaciju izmeŞu osobina ličnosti i neverstva。423名有亲密关系的人参与了这项研究(22.2%的男性,平均年龄22岁,年龄在18至52岁之间)。结果表明,社交网络上的自恋、感觉和自我意识对替代注意力的预测有独特的贡献,而不信任只与自我意识有独特的联系。自恋与抗命之间的关系完全集中在自我注意和对替代品的注意上,而感觉与抗命的关系仅集中在替代品注意上。这项研究的结果表明,在将注意力转向替代品和怀疑之间进行概念上的区别是合理的,而且这两种形式的非法伴侣关系可能是由不同的心理需求驱动的。
{"title":"Nelojalna partnerska ponašanja na društvenim mrežama: doprinos osobina ličnosti i samoprezentacije neverstvu i obraćanju pažnje na alternative","authors":"Anja Štraser, Olga Lukić, Bojana Bodroža","doi":"10.19090/pp.2021.3.365-391","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2021.3.365-391","url":null,"abstract":"Društvene mreže predstavljaju kontekst u kom se aktivno uspostavljaju i razvijaju intimni odnosi. Zbog specifičnosti onlajn interakcije, društvene mreže su pogodno okruženje u kom se ispoljavaju i razna nelojalna partnerska ponašanja. U ovom radu ispitivane su determinante obraćanja pažnje na alternativne partnere i neverstva na društvenim mrežama, a cilj je bio da se ispita doprinos narcizma, traženja senzacija i samoprezentacije navedenim oblicima nelojalnog partnerskog ponašanja. Uz to, ispitivan je medijatorski efekat samoprezentacije i obraćanja pažnje na alternative na relaciju između osobina ličnosti i neverstva. U istraživanju su učestvovale 423 osobe koje su trenutno u intimnoj vezi (22.2% muškog pola, prosečna starost 22, raspon godina od 18 do 52 godine). Rezultati pokazuju da narcizam, traženje senzacija i samoprezentacija na društvenim mrežama daju unikatni doprinos predikciji obraćanja pažnje na alternative, dok je neverstvo unikatno povezano samo sa samoprezentacijom. Relacija narcizma i neverstva potpuno je posredovana samoprezentacijom i obraćanjem pažnje na alternative, dok je odnos traženja senzacija i neverstva posredovan samo obraćanjem pažnje na alternative. Nalazi ovog istraživanja sugerišu da je opravdano praviti konceptualnu razliku između obraćanja pažnje na alternative i neverstva, kao i da ova ova dva oblika nelojalnog partnerskog ponašanja mogu biti motivisana različitim psihološkim potrebama.","PeriodicalId":43074,"journal":{"name":"Primenjena Psihologija","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49411048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-30DOI: 10.19090/pp.2021.3.329-364
Bojana M. Dinić, Anđela Cmiljanić, N. Rokvić
Osnovni cilj ovog istraživanja je utvrđivanje relacija između crta Mračne tetrade i faktora aleksitimije, uzimajući u obzir multidimenzionalnu prirodu mračnih crta, kao i njihove antagonističke (maladaptivne) aspekte i aspekte delotvornosti ili agensne aspekte (adaptivnije aspekte). Dodatno, ispitana je medijatorska uloga faktora aleksitimije u odnosu između mračnih crta i distresa. Na uzorku od 355 ispitanika (71.3% ženskog pola) iz opšte populacije, primenjeni su sledeći instrumenti: Toronto skala aleksitimije, Skala depresije, anksioznosti i stresa, Levensonova skala psihopatije, Petofaktorski inventar makijavelizma, Kratka verzija Petofaktorskog inventara narcizma, Procena sadističke ličnosti. Rezultati pokazuju da mračne crte i faktori aleksitimije dele 56% zajedničke varijanse, te da su dominantni prediktori aleksitimije sekundarna psihopatija u pozitivnom smeru i makijavelistička delotvornost u negativnom smeru, a potom i narcistički antagonizam i primarna psihopatija, oba u pozitivnom smeru. Rezultati pokazuju da faktor mračnih crta koji okuplja agensne karakteristike na pozitivnom polu ostvaruje veći i negativni doprinos u objašnjenju aleksitimije i distresa, u odnosu na faktor koji okuplja primarno antagonističke karakteristike. Mračnim crtama je najviše objašnjen faktor aleksitimije koji se odnosi na probleme u identifikaciji emocija, i ujedno je ovaj faktor značajan medijator u predikciji distresa na osnovu sekundarne psihopatije, makijavelističke delotvornosti ili oba faktora mračnih crta. Naime, ovaj kognitivni deficit u razumevanju emocija doprinosi povećanju distresa u slučaju primarno antagonističkih mračnih crta, dok faktor delotvornosti preko manjih problema u identifikaciji emocija doprinosi redukciji distresa.
{"title":"Relacije Mračne tetrade, aleksitimije i distresa: analiza na nivou faceta, antagonističkog i agensnog faktora mračnih crta","authors":"Bojana M. Dinić, Anđela Cmiljanić, N. Rokvić","doi":"10.19090/pp.2021.3.329-364","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2021.3.329-364","url":null,"abstract":"Osnovni cilj ovog istraživanja je utvrđivanje relacija između crta Mračne tetrade i faktora aleksitimije, uzimajući u obzir multidimenzionalnu prirodu mračnih crta, kao i njihove antagonističke (maladaptivne) aspekte i aspekte delotvornosti ili agensne aspekte (adaptivnije aspekte). Dodatno, ispitana je medijatorska uloga faktora aleksitimije u odnosu između mračnih crta i distresa. Na uzorku od 355 ispitanika (71.3% ženskog pola) iz opšte populacije, primenjeni su sledeći instrumenti: Toronto skala aleksitimije, Skala depresije, anksioznosti i stresa, Levensonova skala psihopatije, Petofaktorski inventar makijavelizma, Kratka verzija Petofaktorskog inventara narcizma, Procena sadističke ličnosti. Rezultati pokazuju da mračne crte i faktori aleksitimije dele 56% zajedničke varijanse, te da su dominantni prediktori aleksitimije sekundarna psihopatija u pozitivnom smeru i makijavelistička delotvornost u negativnom smeru, a potom i narcistički antagonizam i primarna psihopatija, oba u pozitivnom smeru. Rezultati pokazuju da faktor mračnih crta koji okuplja agensne karakteristike na pozitivnom polu ostvaruje veći i negativni doprinos u objašnjenju aleksitimije i distresa, u odnosu na faktor koji okuplja primarno antagonističke karakteristike. Mračnim crtama je najviše objašnjen faktor aleksitimije koji se odnosi na probleme u identifikaciji emocija, i ujedno je ovaj faktor značajan medijator u predikciji distresa na osnovu sekundarne psihopatije, makijavelističke delotvornosti ili oba faktora mračnih crta. Naime, ovaj kognitivni deficit u razumevanju emocija doprinosi povećanju distresa u slučaju primarno antagonističkih mračnih crta, dok faktor delotvornosti preko manjih problema u identifikaciji emocija doprinosi redukciji distresa.","PeriodicalId":43074,"journal":{"name":"Primenjena Psihologija","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43485869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-17DOI: 10.19090/pp.2021.3.253-275
Predrag Nedimović, Sučica Zdravković
Lightness contrast alters lightness of a target decreasing its similarity with neighbouring surfaces (inducers), while lightness assimilation has an opposite effect, similarity is increased. Previous studies emphasized some aspects of stimulation that favour occurrence of one or both of these two phenomena: spatial frequency of the inducers, magnitude and direction of the reflectance difference between the target and the inducers. More importantly, based on previous studies three precise hypotheses can be formulated that predict occurrence of the two phenomena: spatial frequency, differential stimulation and assimilation asymmetry. We manipulated target and inducers’ reflectance, and inducers’ spatial frequency. This enabled us not only to test the importance of these factors, but to predict lightness for each stimulus, according to all three hypotheses. Our results confirmed the importance of tested factors for both lightness contrast and assimilation. Unfortunately, the proposed hypotheses were poor in predicting the obtained data. Differential stimulation hypothesis correctly predicted obtained effect in less than half situations, since small reflectance differences produced contrast, and large differences produced assimilation. Spatial frequency hypothesis did not correctly predict the strength of obtained effects, and we obtained largest assimilation effects with low spatial frequency inducers. Finally, assimilation asymmetry hypothesis did not predict a single obtained effect. Contrary to this hypothesis predictions, we obtained contrast with decrement, and assimilation with increment inducers.
{"title":"Lightness contrast & assimilation: testing the hypotheses","authors":"Predrag Nedimović, Sučica Zdravković","doi":"10.19090/pp.2021.3.253-275","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2021.3.253-275","url":null,"abstract":"Lightness contrast alters lightness of a target decreasing its similarity with neighbouring surfaces (inducers), while lightness assimilation has an opposite effect, similarity is increased. Previous studies emphasized some aspects of stimulation that favour occurrence of one or both of these two phenomena: spatial frequency of the inducers, magnitude and direction of the reflectance difference between the target and the inducers. More importantly, based on previous studies three precise hypotheses can be formulated that predict occurrence of the two phenomena: spatial frequency, differential stimulation and assimilation asymmetry. \u0000We manipulated target and inducers’ reflectance, and inducers’ spatial frequency. This enabled us not only to test the importance of these factors, but to predict lightness for each stimulus, according to all three hypotheses. Our results confirmed the importance of tested factors for both lightness contrast and assimilation. \u0000Unfortunately, the proposed hypotheses were poor in predicting the obtained data. Differential stimulation hypothesis correctly predicted obtained effect in less than half situations, since small reflectance differences produced contrast, and large differences produced assimilation. Spatial frequency hypothesis did not correctly predict the strength of obtained effects, and we obtained largest assimilation effects with low spatial frequency inducers. Finally, assimilation asymmetry hypothesis did not predict a single obtained effect. Contrary to this hypothesis predictions, we obtained contrast with decrement, and assimilation with increment inducers.","PeriodicalId":43074,"journal":{"name":"Primenjena Psihologija","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45654559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-20DOI: 10.19090/PP.2021.2.211-227
M. K. Topić
Research from different disciplines points to a positive relationship between reading fiction and empathy. Some studies also focus on potential moderators of this relationship, such as individual personality differences and how the individual engages with the fictional text in terms of transportation. The aim of this paper is to investigate whether reading-induced affective empathy can be explained by personality traits, namely Agreeableness, and Emotional engagement, and Transportation. Participants were 132 undergraduate and graduate students, who read a short fictional story by J. Joyce and after that completed a set of questionnaires, containing measures of Big Five personality traits, Emotional engagement, Transportation and affective Empathy. Results show that there is a strong positive relationship between Agreeableness and story-induced Empathy and that this relationship can be partially explained by Emotional engagement. Transportation, on the other hand, did not show to be an important variable in the relationship of Agreeableness and story-induced Empathy, neither did it show to be a significant factor in this relationship when Emotional engagement was included. This study provides information for additional understanding of the relationship between reading fiction and empathy through the investigation of its mediators.
{"title":"EMOTIONAL ENGAGEMENT, BUT NOT TRANSPORTATION LEADS TO HIGHER EMPATHY AFTER READING A FICTIONAL STORY, IN MORE AGREEABLE PARTICIPANTS","authors":"M. K. Topić","doi":"10.19090/PP.2021.2.211-227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19090/PP.2021.2.211-227","url":null,"abstract":"Research from different disciplines points to a positive relationship between reading fiction and empathy. Some studies also focus on potential moderators of this relationship, such as individual personality differences and how the individual engages with the fictional text in terms of transportation. The aim of this paper is to investigate whether reading-induced affective empathy can be explained by personality traits, namely Agreeableness, and Emotional engagement, and Transportation. Participants were 132 undergraduate and graduate students, who read a short fictional story by J. Joyce and after that completed a set of questionnaires, containing measures of Big Five personality traits, Emotional engagement, Transportation and affective Empathy. Results show that there is a strong positive relationship between Agreeableness and story-induced Empathy and that this relationship can be partially explained by Emotional engagement. Transportation, on the other hand, did not show to be an important variable in the relationship of Agreeableness and story-induced Empathy, neither did it show to be a significant factor in this relationship when Emotional engagement was included. \u0000This study provides information for additional understanding of the relationship between reading fiction and empathy through the investigation of its mediators.","PeriodicalId":43074,"journal":{"name":"Primenjena Psihologija","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46080832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-20DOI: 10.19090/PP.2021.2.189-210
Mitja Ružojčić
Nepoželjna organizacijska ponašanja (NOP) štetna su ponašanja koja donose milijunske gubitke organizacijama, a ujedno škode psihološkoj dobrobiti i produktivnosti zaposlenika. Ličnost je jedna od glavnih determinanti NOP-a, no istraživanja odnosa ličnosti i NOP-a uglavnom su se fokusirala na svjesni aspekt ličnosti, tzv. eksplicitnu ličnosti i tek su u manjem broju razmatrala psihološke mehanizme putem kojih ličnost djeluje na NOP. Ovaj rad uključuje pregled istraživanja odnosa ličnosti i NOP-a pri čemu, u odnosu na ranije preglede, razmatra i kako nesvjesni aspekti ličnosti (tzv. implicitna ličnost) mogu pomoći u objašnjavanju NOP-a. U radu se fokusiram se na dvije metode koje pokazuju najveći potencijal za predviđanje radnog ponašanja – Test uvjetovanog rezoniranja i Test implicitnih asocijacija. Nakon toga, razmatram psihološke mehanizme putem kojih eksplicitna i implicitna ličnost djeluju na NOP, koristeći stavove prema poslu i organizaciji i emocije na radnom mjestu kao varijable koje objašnjavaju odnos ličnosti i NOP-a. Konačno, na temelju pregleda istraživanja odnosa ličnosti, stavova, emocija i NOP-a, razvijam teoretski model odnosa ove četiri varijable, koji olakšava razumijevanje složenih psiholoških mehanizama putem kojih implicitna i eksplicitna ličnost dovode do NOP-a.
不受欢迎的组织行为(NOP)对数百万组织的损失以及员工的心理利益和生产力都是有害的。人格是NOP的主要决定因素之一,但对人格和NOP的研究主要集中在人格的意识方面,即。显性人格和心理机制至少只有NOP才考虑过。这项工作包括对人格和NOP关系的回顾,这有助于解释NOP的无意识人格(即内隐人格)。在我的工作中,我专注于两种显示出最高潜力的工作预测方法——条件解决测试和内隐联想测试。之后,我考虑了爆炸性和内隐性人格对NOP作用的心理机制,将工作和组织的位置以及工作中的情绪作为解释人格与NOP之间关系的变量。Konačno,na temelju pregleda istraživanja odnosa ličnosti,stavova,emocija i NOP-a,razvijam teoretski模型odnosa ovečetiri varijale,koji olakšava razumijevanje složenih psiholoških mehanizama putem kojih implicitna i eksplicitna ličnost dovode do NOP-a。
{"title":"PUT DO MRAČNE STRANE POSLA:","authors":"Mitja Ružojčić","doi":"10.19090/PP.2021.2.189-210","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19090/PP.2021.2.189-210","url":null,"abstract":"Nepoželjna organizacijska ponašanja (NOP) štetna su ponašanja koja donose milijunske gubitke organizacijama, a ujedno škode psihološkoj dobrobiti i produktivnosti zaposlenika. Ličnost je jedna od glavnih determinanti NOP-a, no istraživanja odnosa ličnosti i NOP-a uglavnom su se fokusirala na svjesni aspekt ličnosti, tzv. eksplicitnu ličnosti i tek su u manjem broju razmatrala psihološke mehanizme putem kojih ličnost djeluje na NOP. Ovaj rad uključuje pregled istraživanja odnosa ličnosti i NOP-a pri čemu, u odnosu na ranije preglede, razmatra i kako nesvjesni aspekti ličnosti (tzv. implicitna ličnost) mogu pomoći u objašnjavanju NOP-a. U radu se fokusiram se na dvije metode koje pokazuju najveći potencijal za predviđanje radnog ponašanja – Test uvjetovanog rezoniranja i Test implicitnih asocijacija. Nakon toga, razmatram psihološke mehanizme putem kojih eksplicitna i implicitna ličnost djeluju na NOP, koristeći stavove prema poslu i organizaciji i emocije na radnom mjestu kao varijable koje objašnjavaju odnos ličnosti i NOP-a. Konačno, na temelju pregleda istraživanja odnosa ličnosti, stavova, emocija i NOP-a, razvijam teoretski model odnosa ove četiri varijable, koji olakšava razumijevanje složenih psiholoških mehanizama putem kojih implicitna i eksplicitna ličnost dovode do NOP-a.","PeriodicalId":43074,"journal":{"name":"Primenjena Psihologija","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46596220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-20DOI: 10.19090/PP.2021.2.149-171
T. Velki, Marija Milić
Objective: the aim of the study was to examine the mediating role of stress in associations between online risky behavior and three factors, namely, real-life risky behaviors and information security awareness as risk factors, and life satisfaction as a protective factor. Method: participants were university students (N=883, 40.5% male, and 59.5% female) with an average age of M=21.93 years (SD=4.29). They filled out the Users’ Information Security Awareness Questionnaire, Youth self-reported delinquency and risk behaviors questionnaire, Life satisfaction scale and Perceived Stress Scale. Result: Mediational analysis revealed a mediating role of stress: stress had a partially mediating role in the association between real-life risky behaviors and online risky behavior, making the association stronger. However, stress had a fully mediating role in the association between life satisfaction and online risky behavior, that is, the association was non-significant in the presence of stress. Conclusions: Overall results indicate that stress experienced in real-life situations can be a trigger for online risky behavior in adolescents. Under stressed conditions, adolescents choose to focus on negative outcomes more frequently because they refocus their cognitive resources on emotion regulation and leave inhibitory processes necessary to prevent risky behaviors uncontrolled.
{"title":"STRESS AS A MEDIATOR BETWEEN RISK AND PROTECTIVE FACTORS AND ONLINE RISKY BEHAVIORS IN ADOLESCENTS","authors":"T. Velki, Marija Milić","doi":"10.19090/PP.2021.2.149-171","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19090/PP.2021.2.149-171","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: the aim of the study was to examine the mediating role of stress in associations between online risky behavior and three factors, namely, real-life risky behaviors and information security awareness as risk factors, and life satisfaction as a protective factor. Method: participants were university students (N=883, 40.5% male, and 59.5% female) with an average age of M=21.93 years (SD=4.29). They filled out the Users’ Information Security Awareness Questionnaire, Youth self-reported delinquency and risk behaviors questionnaire, Life satisfaction scale and Perceived Stress Scale. Result: Mediational analysis revealed a mediating role of stress: stress had a partially mediating role in the association between real-life risky behaviors and online risky behavior, making the association stronger. However, stress had a fully mediating role in the association between life satisfaction and online risky behavior, that is, the association was non-significant in the presence of stress. Conclusions: Overall results indicate that stress experienced in real-life situations can be a trigger for online risky behavior in adolescents. Under stressed conditions, adolescents choose to focus on negative outcomes more frequently because they refocus their cognitive resources on emotion regulation and leave inhibitory processes necessary to prevent risky behaviors uncontrolled.","PeriodicalId":43074,"journal":{"name":"Primenjena Psihologija","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45633604","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-20DOI: 10.19090/PP.2021.2.229-248
Katija Kalebić Jakupčević, Ina Ercegovac, Snježana Dobrota
The aim of this research was to determine the relationship between mindfulness, absorption in music, and emotion regulation through music in people who have different tastes in music. The research started from the assumption that absorption in music means the possibility of deep “absorption” in musical experience and thus a greater possibility of emotion regulation through music. In contrast to absorption, mindfulness as full awareness of the current moment or a state of consciousness in which attention is intentionally focused on one’s own experiences (bodily sensations, senses, thoughts, or emotions) could make it difficult to indulge in a musical experience. In order to test these assumptions, a study was conducted on 252 participants in late adolescence and young adulthood age who, in addition to using instruments designed to examine absorption in music, mindfulness, and emotion regulation through music, assessed their musical taste. The results showed a positive correlation between the preferences for different music styles and absorption in music, as well as between absorption in music and different strategies for regulating emotions through music. Mindfulness, on the other hand, proved to be negatively correlated with both absorption in music and most strategies for regulating mood through music. Conducted regression analyses showed that in addition to controlling musical taste, absorption in music is a positive predictor of all emotion regulation strategies, while mindfulness is a negative predictor of discharging negative emotions and forgetting unwanted thoughts and feelings through music.
{"title":"MUSIC AS A TOOL FOR MOOD REGULATION: THE ROLE OF ABSORPTION VS. MINDFULNESS","authors":"Katija Kalebić Jakupčević, Ina Ercegovac, Snježana Dobrota","doi":"10.19090/PP.2021.2.229-248","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19090/PP.2021.2.229-248","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research was to determine the relationship between mindfulness, absorption in music, and emotion regulation through music in people who have different tastes in music. The research started from the assumption that absorption in music means the possibility of deep “absorption” in musical experience and thus a greater possibility of emotion regulation through music. In contrast to absorption, mindfulness as full awareness of the current moment or a state of consciousness in which attention is intentionally focused on one’s own experiences (bodily sensations, senses, thoughts, or emotions) could make it difficult to indulge in a musical experience. In order to test these assumptions, a study was conducted on 252 participants in late adolescence and young adulthood age who, in addition to using instruments designed to examine absorption in music, mindfulness, and emotion regulation through music, assessed their musical taste. The results showed a positive correlation between the preferences for different music styles and absorption in music, as well as between absorption in music and different strategies for regulating emotions through music. Mindfulness, on the other hand, proved to be negatively correlated with both absorption in music and most strategies for regulating mood through music. Conducted regression analyses showed that in addition to controlling musical taste, absorption in music is a positive predictor of all emotion regulation strategies, while mindfulness is a negative predictor of discharging negative emotions and forgetting unwanted thoughts and feelings through music.","PeriodicalId":43074,"journal":{"name":"Primenjena Psihologija","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45984676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. Oljaca, S. Sadiković, B. Branovački, D. Pajić, S. Smederevac, D. Mitrović
The aims of this study were to examine possible differences and factors that contribute to risk perception and compliance with preventive measures at the beginning (T1) and the end (T2) of the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. The sample consisted of 423 participants (M = 30.29, SD = 14.45; 69% female). Compliance, risk perception and trust in information were significantly higher in T1 than T2. For risk perception, significant predictors in both T1 and T2 were age, Emotionality (HEXACO-PI-R) and Unrealistic Optimism (NLE, Negative Life Events). Trust in information was a significant predictor in T1, while Unrealistic Optimism (Positive Life Events) was a signifi-cant predictor in T2. For compliance, significant predictors in T1 were gender and trust in information while in T2 were Emo-tionality, Extraversion, Conscientiousness (HEXACO-PI-R), NLE and trust in information, for both T1 and T2. In general, findings suggest a much more pronounced role of personality traits in adherence to protective measures at the end than at the beginning of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Serbia. Also, the results indicate the role of unrealistic opti-mism regarding negative life events in lower compliance with protective measures.
{"title":"Unrealistic optimism and HEXACO traits as predictors of risk perception and compliance with COVID-19 preventive measures during the first wave of pandemic","authors":"M. Oljaca, S. Sadiković, B. Branovački, D. Pajić, S. Smederevac, D. Mitrović","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/rt64j","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rt64j","url":null,"abstract":"The aims of this study were to examine possible differences and factors that contribute to risk perception and compliance with preventive measures at the beginning (T1) and the end (T2) of the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. The sample consisted of 423 participants (M = 30.29, SD = 14.45; 69% female). Compliance, risk perception and trust in information were significantly higher in T1 than T2. For risk perception, significant predictors in both T1 and T2 were age, Emotionality (HEXACO-PI-R) and Unrealistic Optimism (NLE, Negative Life Events). Trust in information was a significant predictor in T1, while Unrealistic Optimism (Positive Life Events) was a signifi-cant predictor in T2. For compliance, significant predictors in T1 were gender and trust in information while in T2 were Emo-tionality, Extraversion, Conscientiousness (HEXACO-PI-R), NLE and trust in information, for both T1 and T2. In general, findings suggest a much more pronounced role of personality traits in adherence to protective measures at the end than at the beginning of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Serbia. Also, the results indicate the role of unrealistic opti-mism regarding negative life events in lower compliance with protective measures.","PeriodicalId":43074,"journal":{"name":"Primenjena Psihologija","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69649237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}