Prof. Dr. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu’s new book released in November 2019 and titled Medreseler Neydi, Ne Degildi? Osmanlilarda Akli Ilimlerin Egitimi ve Modern Bilimin Girisi [What were Madrasas, What were They not? Instruction of Rational Disciplines and Introduction of Modern Science to the Ottomans] is a collection of essays published in the last decades. In the book’s prefice Prof. Ihsanoglu stresses the newly emerged research interest in the madrasa history and “the nostalgia for the madrasa education” due to idealogical reasons rather than objective necessity. The extended introduction to the book puts forward the issue of how the madrasa history should be approached.
Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu教授的新书于2019年11月出版，名为《Medreseler Neydi, Ne Degildi?》什么是伊斯兰学校，什么不是?《理性学科的指导与奥斯曼人现代科学的介绍》是一本近几十年出版的文集。在书的序言中，Ihsanoglu教授强调了对伊斯兰学校历史的新研究兴趣和“对伊斯兰学校教育的怀旧”，这是由于意识形态的原因，而不是客观的需要。这本书的扩展介绍提出了如何处理伊斯兰学校历史的问题。
{"title":"Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu, Medreseler Neydi, Ne Değildi? Osmanlılarda Akli İlimlerin Eğitimi ve Modern Bilimin Girişi,","authors":"Orlin Sabev","doi":"10.18589/oa.959796","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18589/oa.959796","url":null,"abstract":"Prof. Dr. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu’s new book released in November 2019 and titled Medreseler Neydi, Ne Degildi? Osmanlilarda Akli Ilimlerin Egitimi ve Modern Bilimin Girisi [What were Madrasas, What were They not? Instruction of Rational Disciplines and Introduction of Modern Science to the Ottomans] is a collection of essays published in the last decades. In the book’s prefice Prof. Ihsanoglu stresses the newly emerged research interest in the madrasa history and “the nostalgia for the madrasa education” due to idealogical reasons rather than objective necessity. The extended introduction to the book puts forward the issue of how the madrasa history should be approached.","PeriodicalId":43709,"journal":{"name":"Osmanli Arastirmalari-The Journal of Ottoman Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67530865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Osmanli donemi kitap uretim anlayisina gore eserin icindekiler kadar fiziksel durumu da onem arz etmekteydi. Bu cercevede uretilecek nushanin yazilmasi, suslen- mesi, resimlenmesi, ciltlenmesi gibi asamalari da sanatin bir parcasi olarak gorulmus ve onemsenmistir. Donemin sartlari icerisinde kitap uretimi masrafli bir is oldugu icin sanat degeri yuksek eserler cogunlukla sarayin himayesinde uretilmistir. Bugune kadar yapilan calismalarla Osmanli kitap sanatinin farkli vecheleri gun yuzune cikartilmis olmakla birlikte resimleme surecine iliskin bilinenler oldukca sinirlidir. Nakkasin bir kitabi nasil resimledigi, sahnelerin ciziminde uzerinde calisilan kitabin iceriginin ne kadar belirleyici oldugu, gelenegin ne kadar etkisinin bulundugu, kitabin muellifinin bu surece dâhil olup olmadigi cesitli calismalarda sorgulanan ve acikliga kavusturul- maya calisilan meselelerdir. Ancak donem eserlerinde bu sorulari cevaplamaya imkân verecek kayitlar/bilgiler cok sinirlidir. Bununla birlikte III. Mehmed doneminde saray nakkashanesinde uretilmis olan Dâsitân-i Ferruh u Humâ adli eserde bulunan bu yondeki kayitlar, sureci anlama hususunda bilgi verecek mahiyettedir. Eserin muellif nushasi ve bundan hareketle saray nakkashanesinde temize cekilmis ve resimlenmis olan nushasi elimizde bulunmaktadir. Eserin bu ozelligi, nadir bulunan bir hususiyet- tir. Bu yonuyle boyle bir karsilastirma yapma imkâni vermektedir. Muellif nushasinda resim cizilecek alanlar bos birakilmis ve bu alanlarin kenarina nasil bir resim cizmesi gerektigi ile ilgili nakkasi yonlendirici notlar yazilmistir. Bu yazida Dâsitân-i Ferruh u Humâ’daki soz konusu bilgiler isiginda Osmanli doneminde uretilen kitaplarin resimlenme surecleri sorgulanmaya calisilacaktir.
桂花冰淇淋的理念是冰淇淋的身体状况和冰淇淋的身体状态一样高。它是以触摸板的形式写的，它是以触控板的形式组成的，它以一件艺术品的形式组成。由于冰淇淋价格昂贵，书籍装置被巧妙地融入了宫殿的织物中。到目前为止，奥斯曼利的书籍艺术暴露在图像的图像中，而暴露在今天不同老人的饮食中，这让人们非常愤怒。一本书如何被拍摄，一本书的冰如何在场景表面被探测到，历史如何影响它，作者如何被质疑这本书的物理性，以及它能以多快的速度实现。然而，记录/数据非常愤怒，允许这些问题以冻结作品的形式得到回答。此外，这些由Ferruh u Huma撰写的记录被重新记录在Mehmed三楼的宫殿商店中，可以提供有关图像含义的信息。我们有一个老牧师的图案，我们在宫殿的水箱里被清理，我们有一张图像。这是一个罕见的隐私。它可以让你制造carsilastic酸。在大师模型中，图像将被装饰的区域是boss砾岩，半透明性说明了应该如何装饰这些区域边缘的图像设备。这篇文章是我们2011年委内瑞拉抗议特别报道的一部分。
{"title":"Bir Kitap Nasıl Resimlenir? Dâsitân-ı Ferruh u Hümâ Nüshaları Üzerinden Osmanlı Kitap Sanatına Dair Görüşler","authors":"T. Durmuş, Mehmet Gürbüz","doi":"10.18589/oa.959762","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18589/oa.959762","url":null,"abstract":"Osmanli donemi kitap uretim anlayisina gore eserin icindekiler kadar fiziksel durumu da onem arz etmekteydi. Bu cercevede uretilecek nushanin yazilmasi, suslen- mesi, resimlenmesi, ciltlenmesi gibi asamalari da sanatin bir parcasi olarak gorulmus ve onemsenmistir. Donemin sartlari icerisinde kitap uretimi masrafli bir is oldugu icin sanat degeri yuksek eserler cogunlukla sarayin himayesinde uretilmistir. Bugune kadar yapilan calismalarla Osmanli kitap sanatinin farkli vecheleri gun yuzune cikartilmis olmakla birlikte resimleme surecine iliskin bilinenler oldukca sinirlidir. Nakkasin bir kitabi nasil resimledigi, sahnelerin ciziminde uzerinde calisilan kitabin iceriginin ne kadar belirleyici oldugu, gelenegin ne kadar etkisinin bulundugu, kitabin muellifinin bu surece dâhil olup olmadigi cesitli calismalarda sorgulanan ve acikliga kavusturul- maya calisilan meselelerdir. Ancak donem eserlerinde bu sorulari cevaplamaya imkân verecek kayitlar/bilgiler cok sinirlidir. Bununla birlikte III. Mehmed doneminde saray nakkashanesinde uretilmis olan Dâsitân-i Ferruh u Humâ adli eserde bulunan bu yondeki kayitlar, sureci anlama hususunda bilgi verecek mahiyettedir. Eserin muellif nushasi ve bundan hareketle saray nakkashanesinde temize cekilmis ve resimlenmis olan nushasi elimizde bulunmaktadir. Eserin bu ozelligi, nadir bulunan bir hususiyet- tir. Bu yonuyle boyle bir karsilastirma yapma imkâni vermektedir. Muellif nushasinda resim cizilecek alanlar bos birakilmis ve bu alanlarin kenarina nasil bir resim cizmesi gerektigi ile ilgili nakkasi yonlendirici notlar yazilmistir. Bu yazida Dâsitân-i Ferruh u Humâ’daki soz konusu bilgiler isiginda Osmanli doneminde uretilen kitaplarin resimlenme surecleri sorgulanmaya calisilacaktir.","PeriodicalId":43709,"journal":{"name":"Osmanli Arastirmalari-The Journal of Ottoman Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48182304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Para vakfi calismalari genellikle vakif, donem, bolge ya da avariz-esnaf sandiklari gibi belirli bir sosyal zumre kapsaminda ele alinmakta ve kendi sinirlari icinde deger- lendirilmektedir. Bu calismada, sinirlamanin kapsami oldukca genisletilerek secilmis bir mahkeme catisi altinda sayilan basliklarin tumu ele alinmistir. Calisma, incelenmis para vakfi vakfiye sayisini cogaltarak âtilmis gibi duran vakif sisteminin aslinda hare- ketli oldugunu ispat etme arayisinin bir parcasidir. Dahasi, sistematik bir arastirmanin ucuncu etabi oldugu icin karsilastirma zeminini de genisletmistir. Bu kapsamda Yenikoy Mahkemesi’nde, 1591-1883 arasinda kayitli 59 para vakfi vakfiyesi degerlendirilmistir. Ardindan Davutpasa ve Evkaf Muhasebeciligi Mahke- meleri bulgulari da eklenerek 1491-1911 yillari arasinda 371 vakfiyeden elde edilen sonuclar toplu ele alinmistir. Neticede, para vakfi sayisi, vakfedilen meblaglar ve isle- yisin Osmanli’nin askeri, mali, sosyo-ekonomik politikalarindan bagimsiz olmadigi anlasilmistir. Ayrica, vakif hizmetlerinin vâkiflarin donemsel politikalara uygun tavir almalari sayesinde surdurulebilir kilindigi tespit edilmistir.
{"title":"İstanbul Yeniköy Mahkemesi Para Vakfı Kayıtları (1591-1883)","authors":"Çiğdem Gürsoy","doi":"10.18589/oa.959752","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18589/oa.959752","url":null,"abstract":"Para vakfi calismalari genellikle vakif, donem, bolge ya da avariz-esnaf sandiklari gibi belirli bir sosyal zumre kapsaminda ele alinmakta ve kendi sinirlari icinde deger- lendirilmektedir. Bu calismada, sinirlamanin kapsami oldukca genisletilerek secilmis bir mahkeme catisi altinda sayilan basliklarin tumu ele alinmistir. Calisma, incelenmis para vakfi vakfiye sayisini cogaltarak âtilmis gibi duran vakif sisteminin aslinda hare- ketli oldugunu ispat etme arayisinin bir parcasidir. Dahasi, sistematik bir arastirmanin ucuncu etabi oldugu icin karsilastirma zeminini de genisletmistir. Bu kapsamda Yenikoy Mahkemesi’nde, 1591-1883 arasinda kayitli 59 para vakfi vakfiyesi degerlendirilmistir. Ardindan Davutpasa ve Evkaf Muhasebeciligi Mahke- meleri bulgulari da eklenerek 1491-1911 yillari arasinda 371 vakfiyeden elde edilen sonuclar toplu ele alinmistir. Neticede, para vakfi sayisi, vakfedilen meblaglar ve isle- yisin Osmanli’nin askeri, mali, sosyo-ekonomik politikalarindan bagimsiz olmadigi anlasilmistir. Ayrica, vakif hizmetlerinin vâkiflarin donemsel politikalara uygun tavir almalari sayesinde surdurulebilir kilindigi tespit edilmistir.","PeriodicalId":43709,"journal":{"name":"Osmanli Arastirmalari-The Journal of Ottoman Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67530639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
2001’de tamamlanmis bir doktora tezi veya 2003’te basilmis bir kitaba1 yakla- sik yirmi yil sonra bir elestiri yazilmasina gereksiz ve gec kalinmis bir ugras olarak bakilabilir. Ancak, bu sure zarfinda daha genel nitelikte kimi elestiriler yazilmissa da,2 halihazirda literaturde muteber bir yerde bulunuyor olmasi bakimindan boyle bir girisim gec de olsa gerekli gorulmustur. Zira Osmanli hukuk tarihi alaninda, yapilmis ve yapilacak calismalar icin bir kilavuz muamelesi goren kitabin hak ettigi yerin daha somut olarak belirlenmesi bilimsel acidan onem arz etmektedir. Kritik iceren bir ozet mahiyetinde de okunabilecek bu degerlendirmenin basinda, kitabin uzerine oturtuldugu argumanlar acisindan tespit edilen nokta- lar maddeler halinde siralandi. Metinde gerekli goruldugu yerlerde detayli notlar dusuldu ve kimi yerlerde somut ornekler uzerinden elestiriler yapildi. Degerlen- dirmenin sonunda uc belge gorseli ek olarak verildi. Terekeler bahsinde gerek duyulan bazi atiflarin kontrolu ve karsilastirmalari yapildi. Bu bahiste tespit edi- len maddi hatalar tablo halinde gosterildi. Sair yerlerde goze takilan bazi okuma yanlislarina duzeltmeler yapildi.
{"title":"Boğaç A. Ergene’nin Osmanlı Hukuku Eleştirisinin Eleştirisi","authors":"K. Yıldız","doi":"10.18589/oa.959781","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18589/oa.959781","url":null,"abstract":"2001’de tamamlanmis bir doktora tezi veya 2003’te basilmis bir kitaba1 yakla- sik yirmi yil sonra bir elestiri yazilmasina gereksiz ve gec kalinmis bir ugras olarak bakilabilir. Ancak, bu sure zarfinda daha genel nitelikte kimi elestiriler yazilmissa da,2 halihazirda literaturde muteber bir yerde bulunuyor olmasi bakimindan boyle bir girisim gec de olsa gerekli gorulmustur. Zira Osmanli hukuk tarihi alaninda, yapilmis ve yapilacak calismalar icin bir kilavuz muamelesi goren kitabin hak ettigi yerin daha somut olarak belirlenmesi bilimsel acidan onem arz etmektedir. Kritik iceren bir ozet mahiyetinde de okunabilecek bu degerlendirmenin basinda, kitabin uzerine oturtuldugu argumanlar acisindan tespit edilen nokta- lar maddeler halinde siralandi. Metinde gerekli goruldugu yerlerde detayli notlar dusuldu ve kimi yerlerde somut ornekler uzerinden elestiriler yapildi. Degerlen- dirmenin sonunda uc belge gorseli ek olarak verildi. Terekeler bahsinde gerek duyulan bazi atiflarin kontrolu ve karsilastirmalari yapildi. Bu bahiste tespit edi- len maddi hatalar tablo halinde gosterildi. Sair yerlerde goze takilan bazi okuma yanlislarina duzeltmeler yapildi.","PeriodicalId":43709,"journal":{"name":"Osmanli Arastirmalari-The Journal of Ottoman Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67530689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ali Anooshahr’s Turkestan and the Rise of Eurasian Empires: A Study of Pol- itics and Invented Traditions explores how the late medieval and early modern Persianate historians dealt with the Turco-Mongol lineages of the founders of the Ottoman, Safavid, Mughal, Mongol, and Shibanid empires. As Anooshahr claims, the legacy of Turco-Mongol heritage was mostly linked with negative associa- tions of “barbarity,” “plundering,” “violence,” and “paganism,” in the Persianate discursive traditions. Therefore, what the Persianate historians attempted to do is either to distance their patrons from such negative legacies, or to redefine their legacies in subtle ways in accordance with imperial needs. These attempts were part of the imperial response to the internal or inter-imperial legitimacy chal- lenges throughout sixteenth-century Eurasia. By studying five Eurasian empires together in comparative approaches, Anooshahr shows how these attempts shared similarities, even though “the particularities and context of each ‘state’ and their ‘ideologues’ were unique” (5).
Ali Anooshahr的《突厥斯坦和欧亚帝国的崛起:政治和虚构传统的研究》探讨了中世纪晚期和现代早期波斯历史学家如何处理奥斯曼帝国、萨法维帝国、莫卧儿帝国、蒙古帝国和什叶派帝国创始人的突厥-蒙古血统。正如Anooshahr所言，突厥-蒙古遗产大多与波斯话语传统中的“野蛮”、“掠夺”、“暴力”和“异教”等负面联想联系在一起。因此，波斯历史学家试图做的要么是让他们的赞助人远离这些负面遗产，要么是根据帝国的需要，以微妙的方式重新定义他们的遗产。这些尝试是帝国对16世纪欧亚大陆内部或帝国内部合法性挑战的回应的一部分。通过比较研究五个欧亚帝国，Anooshahr展示了这些尝试的相似之处，尽管“每个‘国家’及其‘意识形态’的特殊性和背景是独一无二的”(5)。
{"title":"Ali Anooshahr, Turkestan and the Rise of Eurasian Empires: A Study of Politics and In- vented Traditions,","authors":"Hüseyin Ongan Arslan","doi":"10.18589/oa.959788","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18589/oa.959788","url":null,"abstract":"Ali Anooshahr’s Turkestan and the Rise of Eurasian Empires: A Study of Pol- itics and Invented Traditions explores how the late medieval and early modern Persianate historians dealt with the Turco-Mongol lineages of the founders of the Ottoman, Safavid, Mughal, Mongol, and Shibanid empires. As Anooshahr claims, the legacy of Turco-Mongol heritage was mostly linked with negative associa- tions of “barbarity,” “plundering,” “violence,” and “paganism,” in the Persianate discursive traditions. Therefore, what the Persianate historians attempted to do is either to distance their patrons from such negative legacies, or to redefine their legacies in subtle ways in accordance with imperial needs. These attempts were part of the imperial response to the internal or inter-imperial legitimacy chal- lenges throughout sixteenth-century Eurasia. By studying five Eurasian empires together in comparative approaches, Anooshahr shows how these attempts shared similarities, even though “the particularities and context of each ‘state’ and their ‘ideologues’ were unique” (5).","PeriodicalId":43709,"journal":{"name":"Osmanli Arastirmalari-The Journal of Ottoman Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67530698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
After the second half of the 19th century, as the printing in Ottoman Empire became widespread, the number of private printing houses increased and many new actors entered into the Ottoman printing market. Iranian entrepreneurs called Acem Basmacılar/Kitapçılar (‘Ajam Printers/booksellers) were important actors of this market. Some of the printers and booksellers came together to establish companies. Şirket-i Sahafiye-i İraniye (Iranian Book Company), was one of these companies and established by Iranian printers and bibliopoles operating in Istanbul to publish cheaply. It distinguished from other companies because of being a pioneer company in the Ottoman printing history and marked a quarter century in Ottoman printing. Contrary to its place in the Ottoman printing history, this company hasn’t been quested independantly until now. This paper aims to discuss the establishment of the company, the identities and professions of the founders and partners of the company, the place of the print, bookstores, activities of the company, publication categories, publication policy, reader profile and the relationship of the company with the Ottoman official authorities. The paper concentrates especially on the relations of the company with censor mechanism of the Abdülhamid II Era and it will also try to answer the question that whether the Iranian identiy of the founders of the company affected the publication policy.
{"title":"Osmanlı Matbuatında Acemler: Şirket-i Sahafiye-i İraniye","authors":"Filiz Dığıroğlu","doi":"10.18589/OA.862793","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18589/OA.862793","url":null,"abstract":"After the second half of the 19th century, as the printing in Ottoman Empire became widespread, the number of private printing houses increased and many new actors entered into the Ottoman printing market. Iranian entrepreneurs called Acem Basmacılar/Kitapçılar (‘Ajam Printers/booksellers) were important actors of this market. Some of the printers and booksellers came together to establish companies. Şirket-i Sahafiye-i İraniye (Iranian Book Company), was one of these companies and established by Iranian printers and bibliopoles operating in Istanbul to publish cheaply. It distinguished from other companies because of being a pioneer company in the Ottoman printing history and marked a quarter century in Ottoman printing. Contrary to its place in the Ottoman printing history, this company hasn’t been quested independantly until now. This paper aims to discuss the establishment of the company, the identities and professions of the founders and partners of the company, the place of the print, bookstores, activities of the company, publication categories, publication policy, reader profile and the relationship of the company with the Ottoman official authorities. The paper concentrates especially on the relations of the company with censor mechanism of the Abdülhamid II Era and it will also try to answer the question that whether the Iranian identiy of the founders of the company affected the publication policy.","PeriodicalId":43709,"journal":{"name":"Osmanli Arastirmalari-The Journal of Ottoman Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67530147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
By taking the the example of the implementation of quarantine in Mahmud II’s Salonica, this paper aims to demonstrate that the genesis of Ottoman modernization of the Early Tanzimat period was horizontal. So far, the modernization of the Ottoman Empire has been seen as the endings of Ottoman State’s modernization policy. Consequently, there is no lack of carefully carried out and comprehensive research literature. However, this doesn’t alter the notion that the Ottoman modernization was not only a state policy but also a process. Having said this, modernization as a process must involve the questions of what was and who has modernized. One of the modernization areas of the Early Tanzimat was the implementation of quarantine. Ottoman State could implement this Western rooted modern measure only very late, in 1838. Having plague threaten areas like port cities in mind which must have necessitated preventive measures, the implementation of quarantine in Salonica before that date arose the question whether it resulted as central or local government’s initiative. The present paper seeks to answer this question in two steps: first, by verification of this measure in Salonica and second, by examination of the initiative behind it.
{"title":"Yerel Reform – Horizontal Modernleşme: Erken Tanzimat Osmanlı Selanik’inde Karantina Uygulaması","authors":"Gülay Tulasoğlu","doi":"10.18589/OA.862782","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18589/OA.862782","url":null,"abstract":"By taking the the example of the implementation of quarantine in Mahmud II’s Salonica, this paper aims to demonstrate that the genesis of Ottoman modernization of the Early Tanzimat period was horizontal. So far, the modernization of the Ottoman Empire has been seen as the endings of Ottoman State’s modernization policy. Consequently, there is no lack of carefully carried out and comprehensive research literature. However, this doesn’t alter the notion that the Ottoman modernization was not only a state policy but also a process. Having said this, modernization as a process must involve the questions of what was and who has modernized. One of the modernization areas of the Early Tanzimat was the implementation of quarantine. Ottoman State could implement this Western rooted modern measure only very late, in 1838. Having plague threaten areas like port cities in mind which must have necessitated preventive measures, the implementation of quarantine in Salonica before that date arose the question whether it resulted as central or local government’s initiative. The present paper seeks to answer this question in two steps: first, by verification of this measure in Salonica and second, by examination of the initiative behind it.","PeriodicalId":43709,"journal":{"name":"Osmanli Arastirmalari-The Journal of Ottoman Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48464611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kanunî Sultan Süleyman Türbesi, Külliyesi ve Onlara Ait Palanka Üzerine Araştırmalar Öz Uzmanlar Macaristan’da Zigetvar’da Kanunî Sultan Süleyman’ın türbesini 110 yıldan fazla süredir araştırırdı. 2013 yılından önce birçok disiplin uzmanları, kendi alanının metotlarını kullanarak zayıf meslekî görüşlerini yayımlattı. Geçen yıllarda geniş multidisipliner araştırmalar başladı ve onun sonucunda eski inceleme alanları (Almás-Elmalıderesinin kıyısı ve Turbek’teki Aziz Meryem kilisesi) reddedildi, Kanunî Sultan Süleyman’ın türbe-plankasının binaları tamamen yeni bir yerde tespit edildi. Bu makale son 110 yılın en önemli araştırma sonuçlarından bir özet sağlamakla birlikte, aynı zamanda kaynakların jeografik yorumlarını da aydınlatmak amacındadır. Anahtar kelimeler: Osmanlı, Kanunî Sultan Süleyman, türbe, Zigetvar (Szigetvár), Turbék, peyzaj onarımı, jeoarkeoloji.
KanunîSultan Süleyman Türbesi，Külliyesi ve Onlara Ait PalankaÜzerine Araş。2013年之前，一些学科专家使用自己的实地方法发表了他们的低收入访谈。在过去的几年里，大规模的多学科研究开始了，因此，以前的研究领域（Almás-Elmalé海岸和土耳其的圣玛丽教堂）被拒绝了，所罗门的同类建筑在一个新的地方被完全确定。本文旨在阐明来源的地理评论，以及近110年来最重要的研究成果。关键词：奥斯曼，苏丹苏莱曼，土耳其，齐格特瓦尔，土耳其，时装修理，地质。
{"title":"Research on the Türbe Complex of Suleiman the Magnificent in Szigetvár and its Fortification","authors":"N. Pap","doi":"10.18589/OA.862760","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18589/OA.862760","url":null,"abstract":"Kanunî Sultan Süleyman Türbesi, Külliyesi ve Onlara Ait Palanka Üzerine Araştırmalar Öz Uzmanlar Macaristan’da Zigetvar’da Kanunî Sultan Süleyman’ın türbesini 110 yıldan fazla süredir araştırırdı. 2013 yılından önce birçok disiplin uzmanları, kendi alanının metotlarını kullanarak zayıf meslekî görüşlerini yayımlattı. Geçen yıllarda geniş multidisipliner araştırmalar başladı ve onun sonucunda eski inceleme alanları (Almás-Elmalıderesinin kıyısı ve Turbek’teki Aziz Meryem kilisesi) reddedildi, Kanunî Sultan Süleyman’ın türbe-plankasının binaları tamamen yeni bir yerde tespit edildi. Bu makale son 110 yılın en önemli araştırma sonuçlarından bir özet sağlamakla birlikte, aynı zamanda kaynakların jeografik yorumlarını da aydınlatmak amacındadır. Anahtar kelimeler: Osmanlı, Kanunî Sultan Süleyman, türbe, Zigetvar (Szigetvár), Turbék, peyzaj onarımı, jeoarkeoloji.","PeriodicalId":43709,"journal":{"name":"Osmanli Arastirmalari-The Journal of Ottoman Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67530118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper focuses on Laurence Oliphant’s efforts to organize a Jewish settlement in Palestine between 1879 and 1882 and the Ottoman response to these efforts. After giving due information about Oliphant’s Restorationist (Christian Zionist) background in order to understand why he was so deeply interested in the question of Jewish settlement in Palestine, his proposal to the Ottoman government in 1879 on this issue is explained in some detail, based primarily on Ottoman archival documents. This is the only instance in which the Ottoman government was officially faced with the issue of Jewish settlement in Palestine, and was also the first instance in which it was discussed at the highest level, resulting in a response that guided Ottoman policies during the rest of Abdülhamid II period. The following part of the article examines Oliphant’s second attempt at obtaining permission for a Jewish settlement in Palestine in 1882. In this part, American support for Oliphant’s efforts, as well as the Ottoman reaction to this support, will be explained. The Ottoman response to the question of Jewish settlement in Palestine constitutes an important component of the article.
{"title":"The Ottoman Response to Laurence Oliphant’s Project of Jewish Settlement in Palestine (1879-1882)","authors":"Ş. T. Buzpinar","doi":"10.18589/OA.862796","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18589/OA.862796","url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on Laurence Oliphant’s efforts to organize a Jewish settlement in Palestine between 1879 and 1882 and the Ottoman response to these efforts. After giving due information about Oliphant’s Restorationist (Christian Zionist) background in order to understand why he was so deeply interested in the question of Jewish settlement in Palestine, his proposal to the Ottoman government in 1879 on this issue is explained in some detail, based primarily on Ottoman archival documents. This is the only instance in which the Ottoman government was officially faced with the issue of Jewish settlement in Palestine, and was also the first instance in which it was discussed at the highest level, resulting in a response that guided Ottoman policies during the rest of Abdülhamid II period. The following part of the article examines Oliphant’s second attempt at obtaining permission for a Jewish settlement in Palestine in 1882. In this part, American support for Oliphant’s efforts, as well as the Ottoman reaction to this support, will be explained. The Ottoman response to the question of Jewish settlement in Palestine constitutes an important component of the article.","PeriodicalId":43709,"journal":{"name":"Osmanli Arastirmalari-The Journal of Ottoman Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67530156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Kemal Beydilli, Two İbrahims: Müteferrika and His Successor – Off The Founders of The Ottoman Printing Press","authors":"Seyfi̇ Kenan","doi":"10.18589/oa.862923","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18589/oa.862923","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43709,"journal":{"name":"Osmanli Arastirmalari-The Journal of Ottoman Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48239147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：