首页 > 最新文献

EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE最新文献

英文 中文
Notes on Contributors 撰稿人说明
IF 0.3 3区 文学 Q2 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI: 10.1353/eal.2024.a918934
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Notes on Contributors

ben bascom is an assistant professor of English at Ball State University, where he teaches American literature and queer studies. His forthcoming book, Feeling Singular: Queer Masculinities in the Early United States (Oxford UP), depicts a queer and messy world of social outcasts and eccentric personalities all striving for public attention.

michael boyden is a professor of English at Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands. He is the author of Climate and the Picturesque in the American Tropics (Oxford UP, 2022). He has also edited a collected volume titled Climate and American Literature (Cambridge UP, 2020) and a special issue of Early American Literature titled "New Natural History" (2019).

anna brickhouse teaches English and American studies at the University of Virginia. She is currently completing a book titled "Elsewhere Catastrophe: Earthquake and the Invention of America."

ryan carr is a Lecturer-in-Discipline in the Department of English and Comparative Literature at Columbia University, where he teaches classes in Indigenous studies and early American literature and in the Core Curriculum. His first book, a study of the Mohegan-Brothertown minister Samson Occom, is due out with Columbia University Press in early 2024.

vin carretta is professor emeritus of English at the University of Maryland. His recent publications include The Life and Letters of Philip Quaque, the First African Anglican Missionary (U of Georgia P, 2010), coedited with Ty M. Reese; an edition of Letters of the Late Ignatius Sancho, an African (Broadview P, 2015); Equiano, the African: Biography of a Self-Made Man (U of Georgia P, 2005; rev. ed. 2022); Olaudah Equiano: The Interesting Narrative and Other Writings (Penguin, 1995; rev. eds. 2003, 2020); an edition of The Writings of Phillis Wheatley Peters (Penguin, 2019; rev. ed. 2023); and Phillis Wheatley Peters: Biography of a Genius in Bondage (U of Georgia P, 2011, rev. eds. 2014, 2023).

jeannine delombard is a professor of English at the University of California, Santa Barbara, where she is affiliated faculty in the History Department. She specializes in African American and pre-1900 American literature, with a particular interest in the intersections of slavery, law, and culture. She is the author of In the Shadow of the Gallows: Race, Crime, and American Civic Identity (U of Pennsylvania P, 2012) and Slavery on Trial: Law, Abolitionism, and Print Culture (U of North Carolina P, 2007). She is currently completing the first of a pair of book projects that examine the democratization of dignity in ninet

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 撰稿人简介 本-巴斯康(Ben bascom)是波尔州立大学英语系助理教授,教授美国文学和同性恋研究。他即将出版的新书《感觉奇异》(Feeling Singular:他即将出版的新书《Feeling Singular: Queer Masculinities in the Early United States》(牛津大学出版社)描绘了一个由社会弃儿和古怪人物组成的古怪而混乱的世界,他们都在努力争取公众的关注。 迈克尔-博登(Michael Boyden)是荷兰奈梅亨拉德布德大学的英语教授。他著有《美国热带地区的气候与风景画》(Climate and the Picturesque in the American Tropics)(牛津大学出版社,2022 年)。他还编辑了一本名为《气候与美国文学》(Climate and American Literature)的文集(剑桥大学出版社,2020 年)和一本名为《新自然史》(New Natural History)的早期美国文学特刊(2019 年)。她目前正在完成一本名为《别处的灾难》(Elsewhere Catastrophe:瑞安-卡尔是哥伦比亚大学英语和比较文学系的学科讲师,教授土著研究、早期美国文学和核心课程等课程。他的第一部著作是对莫希根-布罗瑟镇牧师萨姆森-奥科姆的研究,将于 2024 年初由哥伦比亚大学出版社出版。他最近的著作包括《第一位非洲圣公会传教士菲利普-夸克的生平与书信》(佐治亚大学出版社,2010 年),与泰-M-里斯合编;《已故非洲人伊格内修斯-桑乔的书信》(布罗德维尤出版社,2015 年);《非洲人艾奎亚诺》:传》(佐治亚大学出版社,2005 年;修订版,2022 年);《奥劳达-艾奎亚诺:The Interesting Narrative and Other Writings》(企鹅出版社,1995 年;修订版,2003 年、2020 年);《The Writings of Phillis Wheatley Peters》(企鹅出版社,2019 年;修订版,2023 年);以及《Phillis Wheatley Peters:jeannine delombard 是加州大学圣巴巴拉分校的英语教授,也是该校历史系的附属教师。她的专业是非裔美国人文学和 1900 年前的美国文学,尤其对奴隶制、法律和文化的交叉点感兴趣。她著有《绞刑架下》(In the Shadow of the Gallows)一书:Race, Crime, and American Civic Identity》(宾夕法尼亚大学出版社,2012 年)和《Slavery on Trial:法律、废奴主义和印刷文化》(北卡罗来纳大学出版社,2007 年)。帕特里克-M-埃尔本(Patrick M. Erben)是西佐治亚大学的英语教授,著有《精神的和谐》(A Harmony of the Spirits:早期宾夕法尼亚州的翻译与社区语言》(Omohundro Institute and U of North Carolina P,2012 年)以及《弗朗西斯-丹尼尔-帕斯托瑞斯读本》(The Francis Daniel Pastorius Reader):美国早期多面手的著作》(宾夕法尼亚州立大学,2019 年)。帕特里克与共同编辑丽贝卡-哈里森(Rebecca Harrison)正在完成文集《在当下书写过去》(Scripting the Past in the Present):早期美国与当代文化》。他未来的著作项目包括 "美国文学的德国虔信派起源 "和康拉德-韦泽的语言学传记。Pat-rick 对高等教育中的共同管理和学术自由问题也很感兴趣。他专门研究 19 世纪长期的美国文学和非裔美国文学,尤其对奴隶叙事、内战研究和环境人文学科感兴趣。除发表多篇论文外,他还著有《内战亡灵与美国现代性》(The Civil War Dead and American Modernity,牛津大学出版社,2018 年)和《绿荫》(Shades of Green:1770-1860年美国奴隶制文学中的自然观》(佐治亚大学出版社,2009年)。他还编辑或合编了多部著作,包括《美国内战:文学与历史选集》(The American Civil War: A Literary and Historical Anthology)(Routledge,2013 年)和《早期美洲奴隶叙事之旅》(Journeys of the Slave Narrative in the Early Americas)(弗吉尼亚大学出版社,2014 年)。她研究早期美国背景下的翻译历史和文化。 theresa Strouth Gaul 是德克萨斯基督教大学的英语教授兼核心课程主任。她的研究重点是 19 世纪美国妇女的写作、原住民和土著人......
{"title":"Notes on Contributors","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a918934","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a918934","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Notes on Contributors <!-- /html_title --></li> </ul> <p><small>ben bascom</small> is an assistant professor of English at Ball State University, where he teaches American literature and queer studies. His forthcoming book, <em>Feeling Singular: Queer Masculinities in the Early United States</em> (Oxford UP), depicts a queer and messy world of social outcasts and eccentric personalities all striving for public attention.</p> <p><small>michael boyden</small> is a professor of English at Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands. He is the author of <em>Climate and the Picturesque in the American Tropics</em> (Oxford UP, 2022). He has also edited a collected volume titled <em>Climate and American Literature</em> (Cambridge UP, 2020) and a special issue of <em>Early American Literature</em> titled \"New Natural History\" (2019).</p> <p><small>anna brickhouse</small> teaches English and American studies at the University of Virginia. She is currently completing a book titled \"Elsewhere Catastrophe: Earthquake and the Invention of America.\"</p> <p><small>ryan carr</small> is a Lecturer-in-Discipline in the Department of English and Comparative Literature at Columbia University, where he teaches classes in Indigenous studies and early American literature and in the Core Curriculum. His first book, a study of the Mohegan-Brothertown minister Samson Occom, is due out with Columbia University Press in early 2024.</p> <p><small>vin carretta</small> is professor emeritus of English at the University of Maryland. His recent publications include <em>The Life and Letters of Philip Quaque, the First African Anglican Missionary</em> (U of Georgia P, 2010), coedited with Ty M. Reese; an edition of <em>Letters of the Late Ignatius Sancho, an African</em> (Broadview P, 2015); <em>Equiano, the African: Biography of a Self-Made Man</em> (U of Georgia P, 2005; rev. ed. 2022); <em>Olaudah Equiano: The Interesting Narrative and Other Writings</em> (Penguin, 1995; rev. eds. 2003, 2020); an edition of <em>The Writings of Phillis Wheatley Peters</em> (Penguin, 2019; rev. ed. 2023); and <em>Phillis Wheatley Peters: Biography of a Genius in Bondage</em> (U of Georgia P, 2011, rev. eds. 2014, 2023).</p> <p><small>jeannine delombard</small> is a professor of English at the University of California, Santa Barbara, where she is affiliated faculty in the History Department. She specializes in African American and pre-1900 American literature, with a particular interest in the intersections of slavery, law, and culture. She is the author of <em>In the Shadow of the Gallows: Race, Crime, and American Civic Identity</em> (U of Pennsylvania P, 2012) and <em>Slavery on Trial: Law, Abolitionism, and Print Culture</em> (U of North Carolina P, 2007). She is currently completing the first of a pair of book projects that examine the democratization of dignity in ninet","PeriodicalId":44043,"journal":{"name":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139766678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Plymouth Colony: Narratives of English Settlement and Native Resistance from the Mayflower to King Philip's War ed. by Lisa Brooks and Kelly Wisecup (review) 普利茅斯殖民地:Lisa Brooks 和 Kelly Wisecup 编著的《从 "五月花号 "到菲利普国王战争期间英国人定居和土著人反抗的叙述》(评论)
IF 0.3 3区 文学 Q2 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI: 10.1353/eal.2024.a918928
Ryan Carr
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Plymouth Colony: Narratives of English Settlement and Native Resistance from the Mayflower to King Philip's War ed. by Lisa Brooks and Kelly Wisecup
  • Ryan Carr (bio)
Plymouth Colony: Narratives of English Settlement and Native Resistance from the Mayflower to King Philip's War
edited by lisa brooks and kelly wisecup
Library of America, 2022
1266 pp.

This massive volume is strange, heterogeneous, and compelling. Published by the redoubtable Library of America to coincide with the four hundredth anniversary of the Mayflower's arrival in North America, Plymouth Colony was edited by Lisa Brooks and Kelly Wisecup, two leading scholars of the Native Northeast, who have assembled an anthology of primary sources that invites readers to rethink the volume's titular theme. The book's main editorial goal is announced in the subtitle of its introduction—"Plymouth in Patuxet: A Reorientation"—and it succeeds in this goal admirably, recontextualizing the history of the colony as a relatively "short-lived" episode transpiring within the homelands of the Wampanoag and other peoples living in the southeastern part of what the colonists called "New England" (xv, 1021).

While the book includes several well-known colonial texts (James Rosier's True Relation, Edward Winslow's Good News from New England, William Bradford's Of Plimoth Plantation, Thomas Morton's New English Canaan, and Mary Rowlandson's Sovereignty and Goodness of God among them), its most important scholarly contribution is to publish these alongside lesser-known writings that reflect Indigenous peoples' historical agency in Patuxet—the region surrounding Plymouth—from the early seventeenth century down to the present day. Some of these texts were cited in Brooks's recent study of King Philip's War, Our Beloved Kin (Yale UP, 2018), but are published here for the very first time in their entirety. Included are deeds and treaties, records of councils held by Native and settler leaders, creation [End Page 225] stories inspired by Wampanoag oral tradition, diplomatic correspondence written during King Philip's War, and later reflections by northeastern Native writers about the tumultuous events of the seventeenth century. Some Herring Pond Wampanoag writings concerning Plymouth are missing here, including those collected and translated in Ives Goddard and Kathleen Bragdon's Native Writings in Massachusett (Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society, vol. 185, 1988), which document some of the earliest experiences of Native American communities subject to Protestant missionization. It would be interesting to k

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 普利茅斯殖民地:Lisa Brooks 和 Kelly Wisecup 编辑的《普利茅斯殖民地:从 "五月花号 "到菲利普国王战争期间英国人定居和原住民反抗的叙述》 Ryan Carr (bio) 普利茅斯殖民地:从 "五月花号 "到菲利普国王战争期间英国人定居和原住民反抗的叙述》(Plymouth Colony:从 "五月花号 "到菲利普国王战争期间英国人定居和土著人反抗的叙述》,由丽莎-布鲁克斯和凯莉-维塞卡普编辑 美国图书馆,2022 年 1266 页。这本巨著内容奇特、异彩纷呈、引人入胜。普利茅斯殖民地》由美国图书馆出版,恰逢 "五月花号 "抵达北美四百周年,该书由丽莎-布鲁克斯和凯利-维塞卡普主编,他们是研究东北部土著居民的两位顶尖学者,他们收集了大量原始资料,邀请读者重新思考该书的主题。本书导言的副标题 "帕图赛特的普利茅斯 "宣布了编辑的主要目标:该书很好地实现了这一目标,将殖民地的历史重新整合为一个相对 "短暂 "的插曲,它发生在被殖民者称为 "新英格兰"(xv, 1021)东南部的万帕诺亚格人和其他民族的家园中。该书收录了几篇著名的殖民地文章(詹姆斯-罗西耶的《真实的关系》、爱德华-温斯洛的《来自新英格兰的好消息》、威廉-布拉德福德的《普利莫斯种植园》、托马斯-莫顿的《新英伦迦南》和玛丽-罗兰森的《上帝的主权与仁慈》等),其最重要的学术贡献是将这些文章与鲜为人知的文章一起出版,这些文章反映了从 17 世纪初至今土著居民在普利茅斯周边地区帕图赛特的历史作用。布鲁克斯最近关于菲利普国王战争的研究《我们挚爱的亲属》(耶鲁大学出版社,2018 年)引用了其中一些文本,但在此首次全文发表。其中包括契约和条约、原住民和定居者领袖召开的会议记录、受万帕诺格人口述传统启发而创作的故事、菲利普国王战争期间撰写的外交信函,以及后来东北原住民作家对 17 世纪动荡事件的反思。这里缺少一些鲱鱼塘万帕诺亚格人关于普利茅斯的著作,包括收集和翻译在 Ives Goddard 和 Kathleen Bragdon 的 Native Writings in Massachusett(《美国哲学学会回忆录》,第 185 卷,1988 年)中的著作,这些著作记录了美洲原住民社区最早接受新教传教的一些经历。布鲁克斯和维塞卡普并没有声称他们的选文详尽无遗,他们的所有选文都值得一读。这本书的结尾是万帕诺亚格族作家兼历史学家琳达-库姆斯(Linda Coombs)的一篇文章,她对普利茅斯建城四百年来殖民地知识生产的 "大胆 "进行了诊断,"好像原住民只是研究或讨论的对象,而不是真正了解自己历史的人"(1096)。普利茅斯殖民地》所收集的文本内容丰富,对于研究普利茅斯、菲利普国王战争或马萨诸塞湾周边原住民社区的研究人员(包括高年级学生)而言,本书的潜在实用性无论怎样强调都不为过。对于任何学者而言,只要其研究工作涉及到这些主题,哪怕只是皮毛,这本书都将是不可或缺的。尽管如此,这本书也有一些怪异之处,可能会让一些读者感到困惑。例如,全书约三分之一的篇幅用于重印威廉-布拉德福德的《普里莫斯种植园》(Of Plimoth Plantation)全文。布拉德福德文本中以欧洲为中心的 "伟人 "观点可能与该书将普利茅斯殖民地作为跨国本土空间中发生的事件进行重新语境化的大目标背道而驰。其他读者可能会感到困惑的是,为什么书中有如此多的篇幅讨论菲利普国王的战争,而编者对这场战争的关注程度丝毫不亚于普利茅斯殖民地本身。当然,在关键的 1670 年代,战争史和殖民地史在很大程度上是交织在一起的,但前者的地理范围要比普利茅斯殖民地广阔得多,涉及的土著民族也比本书写得如此突出的讲马萨诸塞语的民族要多得多...
{"title":"Plymouth Colony: Narratives of English Settlement and Native Resistance from the Mayflower to King Philip's War ed. by Lisa Brooks and Kelly Wisecup (review)","authors":"Ryan Carr","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a918928","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a918928","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Plymouth Colony: Narratives of English Settlement and Native Resistance from the Mayflower to King Philip's War</em> ed. by Lisa Brooks and Kelly Wisecup <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Ryan Carr (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Plymouth Colony: Narratives of English Settlement and Native Resistance from the Mayflower to King Philip's War</em><br/> <small>edited by</small> <small>lisa brooks</small> and <small>kelly wisecup</small><br/> Library of America, 2022<br/> 1266 pp. <p>This massive volume is strange, heterogeneous, and compelling. Published by the redoubtable Library of America to coincide with the four hundredth anniversary of the <em>Mayflower</em>'s arrival in North America, <em>Plymouth Colony</em> was edited by Lisa Brooks and Kelly Wisecup, two leading scholars of the Native Northeast, who have assembled an anthology of primary sources that invites readers to rethink the volume's titular theme. The book's main editorial goal is announced in the subtitle of its introduction—\"Plymouth in Patuxet: A Reorientation\"—and it succeeds in this goal admirably, recontextualizing the history of the colony as a relatively \"short-lived\" episode transpiring within the homelands of the Wampanoag and other peoples living in the southeastern part of what the colonists called \"New England\" (<small>xv</small>, 1021).</p> <p>While the book includes several well-known colonial texts (James Rosier's <em>True Relation</em>, Edward Winslow's <em>Good News from New England</em>, William Bradford's <em>Of Plimoth Plantation</em>, Thomas Morton's <em>New English Canaan</em>, and Mary Rowlandson's <em>Sovereignty and Goodness of God</em> among them), its most important scholarly contribution is to publish these alongside lesser-known writings that reflect Indigenous peoples' historical agency in Patuxet—the region surrounding Plymouth—from the early seventeenth century down to the present day. Some of these texts were cited in Brooks's recent study of King Philip's War, <em>Our Beloved Kin</em> (Yale UP, 2018), but are published here for the very first time in their entirety. Included are deeds and treaties, records of councils held by Native and settler leaders, creation <strong>[End Page 225]</strong> stories inspired by Wampanoag oral tradition, diplomatic correspondence written during King Philip's War, and later reflections by northeastern Native writers about the tumultuous events of the seventeenth century. Some Herring Pond Wampanoag writings concerning Plymouth are missing here, including those collected and translated in Ives Goddard and Kathleen Bragdon's <em>Native Writings in Massachusett</em> (<em>Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society</em>, vol. 185, 1988), which document some of the earliest experiences of Native American communities subject to Protestant missionization. It would be interesting to k","PeriodicalId":44043,"journal":{"name":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139766677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What Woman That Was: Poems for Mary Dyer by Ann Myles (review) 那是怎样的女人安-迈尔斯的《献给玛丽-戴尔的诗》(评论)
IF 0.3 3区 文学 Q2 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI: 10.1353/eal.2024.a918929
Rebecca M. Rosen
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • What Woman That Was: Poems for Mary Dyer by Ann Myles
  • Rebecca M. Rosen (bio)
What Woman That Was: Poems for Mary Dyer
ann Myles
Final Thursday Press, 2022
60 pp.

Most readers of Early American Literature have encountered Mary Barrett Dyer, a follower of Anne Hutchinson, in the records of the Antinomian Controversy of 1636–38 sparked by Hutchinson's preaching. Hutchinson's ministerial trials—capped off by the discovery and exhumation of Dyer's non-normative stillbirth, delivered by Hutchinson in her work as a midwife, and buried on the advice of John Cotton—cemented popular conceptions of both women as vessels of unauthorized and unorthodox speech, rendering Dyer, "the woman who had the Monster," physical proof of spiritual error's toll on the human form (John Winthrop, Short Story of the Rise, Reign, and Ruin of the Antinomians, Familists, and [End Page 227] Libertines [Ralph Smith, 1644]). Scholars of early American and Quaker studies will also recognize Mary Dyer as one of the four members of the Society of Friends executed in Boston from 1660 to 1661, eulogized afterward as martyrs. Though a highly visible presence in both those conflicts, Dyer's own story has never been easy to trace.

Now, in her poetry collection What Woman That Was, Anne Myles gives us the chance not only to encounter Dyer, but also to know her. She gives voice to Dyer, using both her recorded words (from two letters to the Massachusetts General Court) and the imagined encounters she could have had with the texts, figures, and movements of her many times and places. These include the well-documented trials involving not only the accused antinomian Hutchinson, alongside whom she was banished from Massachusetts, but also the trials of fellow executed Quakers William Robinson, Marmaduke Stephenson, and William Leddra, as well as several epochs of nonconformist settler colonial conflicts across the Atlantic world. These poems allow us to see Dyer fully, setting caricature and sensational reportage aside (though Myles has illustrated that dichotomy for us before, in "From Monster to Martyr: Re-presenting Mary Dyer," her 2001 article in this journal (vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–30). Verse allows Myles to recast Dyer as a radical ancestor, achingly present to many who wish to be heard and seen. As "The Prologue: May-shine" suggests, these poems attempt to retrieve "the book of lost words," squaring Dyer's centrality to two major nonconformist power struggles with the glaring absence of her own testimony from the records that cover all but the last months of her life (9).

Dyer, as ventriloquized and met in conversation by Myles, is not a mute victim or zealot. Instead, she is a mysti

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 曾经的女人:安-迈尔斯写给玛丽-戴尔的诗 瑞贝卡-M.-罗森(简历) What Woman That Was:献给玛丽-戴尔的诗》(What Woman That Was: Poems for Mary Dyer),安-迈尔斯最终星期四出版社,2022 年,60 页。大多数研究早期美国文学的读者都曾在有关哈钦森布道引发的 1636-38 年 "禁欲论争 "的记录中见过安妮-哈钦森的追随者玛丽-巴雷特-戴尔。哈钦森的牧师审判以发现和挖掘戴尔的非正常死胎而告终,戴尔的死胎是哈钦森作为助产士接生的,在约翰-科顿(John Cotton)的建议下被埋葬、戴尔是 "生了怪物的女人",她是精神错误对人体造成伤害的物证(约翰-温思罗普,《安息日派、家庭派和自由派的兴起、统治和毁灭的简短故事》[拉尔夫-史密斯,1644 年])。研究早期美国和贵格会的学者也会认识到,玛丽-戴尔是 1660 年至 1661 年在波士顿被处死的四名公谊会成员之一,事后被讴歌为殉道者。虽然戴尔在这两场冲突中都非常引人注目,但她本人的故事却一直难以追溯。现在,在她的诗集《曾经的女人》中,安妮-梅尔斯不仅让我们有机会邂逅戴尔,还让我们有机会了解她。她用戴尔记录下来的文字(两封写给马萨诸塞州普通法院的信),以及她想象中与文本、人物和她所处时代和地点的运动的相遇,为戴尔代言。其中不仅包括记录详实的审判,涉及被控反禁欲主义者哈钦森(她与哈钦森一起被放逐出马萨诸塞州),还包括被处决的贵格会成员威廉-罗宾逊、马马杜克-斯蒂芬森和威廉-莱德拉的审判,以及大西洋世界几个时代的非宗教定居者殖民冲突。这些诗歌让我们得以全面了解戴尔,将漫画和耸人听闻的报道抛在一边(尽管迈尔斯曾在《从怪物到烈士》一文中为我们展示过这种二分法:重新呈现玛丽-戴尔",她 2001 年在本刊发表的文章(第 36 卷,第 1 期,第 1-30 页)。诗歌让迈尔斯将戴尔重新塑造成一位激进的先辈,让许多希望被倾听和被看见的人痛彻心扉。正如 "序言:这些诗歌试图找回 "遗失的文字之书",将戴尔在两场重大的非传统主义权力斗争中的中心地位与她自己的证词在记录中的明显缺失相提并论,这些记录涵盖了她生命中除最后几个月之外的所有时间(9)。戴尔在迈尔斯的口述和对话中,并不是一个哑巴受害者或狂热分子。相反,她是一个神秘主义者,在她的信念中欣喜若狂,即使她丈夫殖民定居者的野心、对土地的渴求以及对家庭规范性的渴望既强化了她的宗教演变,也干扰了她的宗教演变。在此过程中,迈尔斯抒情地化解了戴尔在美国早期性别、宗教和法律史上的两次重大断裂,展示了她是如何成为这两次断裂中的关键人物的。迈尔斯巧妙地展示了戴尔在这一时间轴上的每一点所处的位置,勾勒出她不拘一格的精神自我实现的脉络。这些线索交织在一起,描绘出一条激进的行动主义、先知般的清晰、自我掌控和坚定不移的自我指导的稳定轨迹。在美国早期调查的各种变体中教授梅尔斯的作品集是很直观的。它与戴维-D-霍尔(David D. Hall)的《安提诺米亚之争》(Antinomian Controversy,杜克大学出版社,1990 年)的文献以及 [尾页 228]任何有关早期美洲妇女著作或抗议运动的研讨会都是天然的搭配。标题诗《那是怎样的女人》将温思罗普的《短篇小说》文本与戴尔重构的反对意见穿插在一起,利用抹去曾经占主导地位的宣传小册子来构建一种反叙述的意识流,传达了我们已经失去了声音的其他证人的坚持不懈的叙述:"那个女人在那一刻知道或不知道她生下的是什么,为什么她的助产士会在夜深人静的时候把它埋掉,那个女人在分娩时晕倒了,她从来没有亲眼看到过,那个女人有两个孩子,现在死了。..
{"title":"What Woman That Was: Poems for Mary Dyer by Ann Myles (review)","authors":"Rebecca M. Rosen","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a918929","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a918929","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>What Woman That Was: Poems for Mary Dyer</em> by Ann Myles <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Rebecca M. Rosen (bio) </li> </ul> <em>What Woman That Was: Poems for Mary Dyer</em><br/> <small>ann Myles</small><br/> Final Thursday Press, 2022<br/> 60 pp. <p>Most readers of <em>Early American Literature</em> have encountered Mary Barrett Dyer, a follower of Anne Hutchinson, in the records of the Antinomian Controversy of 1636–38 sparked by Hutchinson's preaching. Hutchinson's ministerial trials—capped off by the discovery and exhumation of Dyer's non-normative stillbirth, delivered by Hutchinson in her work as a midwife, and buried on the advice of John Cotton—cemented popular conceptions of both women as vessels of unauthorized and unorthodox speech, rendering Dyer, \"the woman who had the Monster,\" physical proof of spiritual error's toll on the human form (John Winthrop, <em>Short Story of the Rise, Reign, and Ruin of the Antinomians, Familists, and</em> <strong>[End Page 227]</strong> <em>Libertines</em> [Ralph Smith, 1644]). Scholars of early American and Quaker studies will also recognize Mary Dyer as one of the four members of the Society of Friends executed in Boston from 1660 to 1661, eulogized afterward as martyrs. Though a highly visible presence in both those conflicts, Dyer's own story has never been easy to trace.</p> <p>Now, in her poetry collection <em>What Woman That Was</em>, Anne Myles gives us the chance not only to encounter Dyer, but also to know her. She gives voice to Dyer, using both her recorded words (from two letters to the Massachusetts General Court) and the imagined encounters she could have had with the texts, figures, and movements of her many times and places. These include the well-documented trials involving not only the accused antinomian Hutchinson, alongside whom she was banished from Massachusetts, but also the trials of fellow executed Quakers William Robinson, Marmaduke Stephenson, and William Leddra, as well as several epochs of nonconformist settler colonial conflicts across the Atlantic world. These poems allow us to see Dyer fully, setting caricature and sensational reportage aside (though Myles has illustrated that dichotomy for us before, in \"From Monster to Martyr: Re-presenting Mary Dyer,\" her 2001 article in this journal (vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–30). Verse allows Myles to recast Dyer as a radical ancestor, achingly present to many who wish to be heard and seen. As \"The Prologue: May-shine\" suggests, these poems attempt to retrieve \"the book of lost words,\" squaring Dyer's centrality to two major nonconformist power struggles with the glaring absence of her own testimony from the records that cover all but the last months of her life (9).</p> <p>Dyer, as ventriloquized and met in conversation by Myles, is not a mute victim or zealot. Instead, she is a mysti","PeriodicalId":44043,"journal":{"name":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139766686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
American Literature in Transition, 1770–1828 ed. by William Huntting Howell and Greta Lafleur (review) 过渡时期的美国文学,1770-1828 年》,William Huntting Howell 和 Greta Lafleur 编辑(评论)
IF 0.3 3区 文学 Q2 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI: 10.1353/eal.2024.a918916
Patrick M. Erben
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • American Literature in Transition, 1770–1828 ed. by William Huntting Howell and Greta Lafleur
  • Patrick M. Erben (bio)
American Literature in Transition, 1770–1828
edited by william huntting howell and greta lafleur
Cambridge University Press, 2022
366 pp.

Reading American Literature in Transition, 1770–1828 feels like attending a conference of the Society of Early Americanists or C19: Society of Nineteenth-Century Americanists: the variety of critical and scholarly approaches, diversity of contributors, and breadth of subjects demonstrate the vitality and maturation of the field of early American studies. Howell and LaFleur's collection should put to rest debates about whether our field suffers a theory deficit and neglects aesthetics and form. The volume's essays adroitly handle topics as wide-ranging as using queer crip theory and decolonizing Native literary aesthetics; they also sharpen our attention to genre with a scope of themes including paranoid style and revival hymn poetics. The volume's wealth of information, density of primary text references, and bibliographic coverage also equip anyone teaching early American literature courses with fresh pedagogical impulses and a wellspring of spin-off subjects to guide undergraduate and graduate research; as with good teaching, the essays assiduously note the greater amount of work remaining to be done on a variety of topics, texts, authors, and archives. Yet [End Page 167] herein also lies a bit of the crux: to achieve this coverage, individual essays perform a feat of scholarly compression that is sometimes difficult to unpack. As the volume is part of a larger anthological series, Nineteenth-Century American Literature in Transition (edited by Cody Marrs), this comes as no surprise; indeed, one can sense each writer's struggle to distill their knowledge into such compact servings. After reading this volume, one may crave the scholarly expansion found in the authors' longer-form work in journals and monographs, for which the essays collected here serve as a veritable amuse-bouche. My "how to use this book" advice is to sample from its rich menu according to critical taste, scholarly interest, and pedagogical demands.

What I appreciate most about Howell and LaFleur's introduction is the way they foreground their personal motivations, the present political stakes of scholarly work on the US national founding period, and the dialoguing between "cultural instability" (15) in the present and the many transformations of the early national period. The volume understands its episodic approach ("exposure and assemblage") as a corrective to the "consensus history" that, especially in pr

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 过渡时期的美国文学,1770-1828》(American Literature in Transition, 1770-1828 ed. by William Huntting Howell and Greta Lafleur Patrick M. Erben (bio) 《过渡时期的美国文学,1770-1828》(American Literature in Transition, 1770-1828 edited by william Huntting Howell and Greta Lafleur Cambridge University Press, 2022 366 pp.阅读《过渡时期的美国文学,1770-1828》的感觉就像参加早期美国学家协会或 C19:19 世纪美国学家协会的会议:批评和学术方法的多样性、撰稿人的多样性以及主题的广泛性都显示了早期美国研究领域的活力和成熟。Howell 和 LaFleur 的文集应能平息关于我们的研究领域是否存在理论缺陷以及是否忽视美学和形式的争论。该文集的文章巧妙地处理了各种主题,如使用同性恋瘸子理论和非殖民化的土著文学美学;他们还通过偏执狂风格和复兴赞美诗诗学等主题,使我们对体裁的关注更加敏锐。该书丰富的信息、原始文本参考文献的密度和书目覆盖面也为教授早期美国文学课程的人提供了新的教学动力和丰富的衍生课题,为本科生和研究生的研究提供了指导;与优秀的教学一样,这些文章也孜孜不倦地指出,在各种主题、文本、作者和档案方面还有大量工作要做。然而 [尾页 167],这也是问题的关键所在:为了实现这种覆盖面,每篇文章都进行了学术压缩,有时甚至难以解读。由于本卷是大型选集《转型中的十九世纪美国文学》(由科迪-马尔斯编辑)的一部分,这并不令人意外;事实上,我们可以感受到每位作者都在努力将自己的知识提炼成如此紧凑的内容。读完这本书后,人们可能会渴望作者们在期刊和专著中发表的长篇作品所带来的学术拓展,而这里收集的文章则是名副其实的消遣之作。我对 "如何使用本书 "的建议是,根据批评家的口味、学术兴趣和教学要求,从本书丰富的菜单中品尝美味佳肴。我最欣赏豪厄尔和拉弗勒尔的引言,他们在引言中强调了个人动机、美国建国时期学术研究的当前政治利害关系,以及当前的 "文化不稳定性"(15)与建国初期的诸多变革之间的对话。特别是在当今右翼意识形态的框架下,"共识史 "赋予早期共和国以 "正直和清晰"(1)的神话,本卷将其情节性方法("暴露和组合")理解为对 "共识史 "的一种纠正。因此,我们应将三个部分("形式与体裁"、"网络 "和 "生活方法")中的文章理解为 "具有生成性和深刻趣味性的杂音,而不是胜利的进军"(1),尤其是通过关注 "庸常甚至平庸 "而不是 "特殊"(13)。我理解这些术语的修辞效果,它们预示着对既有政治叙事和呆板文学方法论的颠覆,但它们夸张的语气实际上掩盖了该书的一点特色--对基础性法律文件的调查和对早期国家烹饪书的深入研究并不奇怪,因为两者都揭示了寻求建立秩序的文本如何掩盖权力、不平等和剥削。不过,如果编者承诺 "喧闹",而我的阅读体验在看似不同的文章中发现了贯穿的线索,那么也许这本书的 "生成 "方法已经达到了目的。在 "形式与体裁 "部分,收录的文章数量最多,将 "风雅小说 "和 "政治家演说 "等早期共和党书信的主要形式与福音派诗歌和烹饪书等更常被忽视的形式进行了对比。马修-加勒特(Matthew Garrett)的 "形式的法律与法律的形式 "一文揭示了《独立宣言》和《宪法》等文件的文学策略 [尾页 168],认为它是建国计划不可或缺的一部分:就像文学合成一样,国家 "在同时具有自主性和集体功能性的基础上,将各组成部分组织成一个想象的整体"(25)。虽然在 "公民表达"(22)方面变得更具包容性,但早期国家的社会组织模式和修辞手法仍在不断变化。
{"title":"American Literature in Transition, 1770–1828 ed. by William Huntting Howell and Greta Lafleur (review)","authors":"Patrick M. Erben","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a918916","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a918916","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>American Literature in Transition, 1770–1828</em> ed. by William Huntting Howell and Greta Lafleur <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Patrick M. Erben (bio) </li> </ul> <em>American Literature in Transition, 1770–1828</em><br/> <small>edited by</small> <small>william huntting howell</small> and <small>greta lafleur</small><br/> Cambridge University Press, 2022<br/> 366 pp. <p>Reading <em>American Literature in Transition, 1770–1828</em> feels like attending a conference of the Society of Early Americanists or C19: Society of Nineteenth-Century Americanists: the variety of critical and scholarly approaches, diversity of contributors, and breadth of subjects demonstrate the vitality and maturation of the field of early American studies. Howell and LaFleur's collection should put to rest debates about whether our field suffers a theory deficit and neglects aesthetics and form. The volume's essays adroitly handle topics as wide-ranging as using queer crip theory and decolonizing Native literary aesthetics; they also sharpen our attention to genre with a scope of themes including paranoid style and revival hymn poetics. The volume's wealth of information, density of primary text references, and bibliographic coverage also equip anyone teaching early American literature courses with fresh pedagogical impulses and a wellspring of spin-off subjects to guide undergraduate and graduate research; as with good teaching, the essays assiduously note the greater amount of work remaining to be done on a variety of topics, texts, authors, and archives. Yet <strong>[End Page 167]</strong> herein also lies a bit of the crux: to achieve this coverage, individual essays perform a feat of scholarly <em>compression</em> that is sometimes difficult to unpack. As the volume is part of a larger anthological series, Nineteenth-Century American Literature in Transition (edited by Cody Marrs), this comes as no surprise; indeed, one can sense each writer's struggle to distill their knowledge into such compact servings. After reading this volume, one may crave the scholarly <em>expansion</em> found in the authors' longer-form work in journals and monographs, for which the essays collected here serve as a veritable amuse-bouche. My \"how to use this book\" advice is to sample from its rich menu according to critical taste, scholarly interest, and pedagogical demands.</p> <p>What I appreciate most about Howell and LaFleur's introduction is the way they foreground their personal motivations, the present political stakes of scholarly work on the US national founding period, and the dialoguing between \"cultural instability\" (15) in the present and the many transformations of the early national period. The volume understands its episodic approach (\"exposure and assemblage\") as a corrective to the \"consensus history\" that, especially in pr","PeriodicalId":44043,"journal":{"name":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139766489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Faith in Exposure: Privacy and Secularism in the Nineteenth-Century United States by Justine S. Murison (review) 暴露中的信仰:十九世纪美国的隐私权与世俗主义》,作者 Justine S. Murison(评论)
IF 0.3 3区 文学 Q2 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI: 10.1353/eal.2024.a918920
Ray Horton
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Faith in Exposure: Privacy and Secularism in the Nineteenth-Century United States by Justine S. Murison
  • Ray Horton (bio)
Faith in Exposure: Privacy and Secularism in the Nineteenth-Century United States
justine s. murison
University of Pennsylvania Press, 2023
266 pp.

"Make Margaret Atwood Fiction Again," exclaimed a banner at the Women's March on Inauguration Day in January 2016. One of the great protest slogans to emerge from the presidency of Donald Trump, this comparison between the regressive state of Gilead in Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale (1985) and the future portended by Trump's coziness with the Christian Right illuminates a key tension within American secularism. On the one hand, in a secular age, many people routinely think of religious faith as a matter of private rather than public concern; on the other hand, as Justine Murison argues in the introduction of Faith in Exposure, "secularism is not so much the absence of religion from the public sphere … but is instead a prescriptive orientation to the world" (4), one that presumes religion's banishment to the private sphere even as it enables "secular institutions to retain their Protestant structures" (7). The nightmare invoked by The Handmaid's Tale and the protest signs it inspired hinge on the danger that the private religious convictions of some, by way of the public mechanisms of politics and law, will trump the right to privacy enjoyed by others, especially where the right to privacy concerns gender, sexuality, and reproduction.

In Faith in Exposure, Murison historicizes this contested terrain between privacy and secularism in American literature and culture, explaining "how, over the course of the nineteenth century, privacy came to encompass such contradictions—underpinning the right to sexual and reproductive rights but also undermining them in the name of religious freedom" (1). To this end, Murison's thorough and persuasive cultural history of religion and privacy in the nineteenth century proves to be a master class in what Victorianists affiliated with the V21 Collective call "strategic presentism," an approach to literary history that highlights how contemporary concerns animate our investment in questions about earlier periods ("Manifesto of the V21 Collective," http://v21collective.org/manifesto-of-the-v21-collective-ten-theses/). For Murison, "a study of the nineteenth-century [End Page 187] American novel," which she calls "the literary form most closely associated with modern subjectivity and the private lives of individuals" (2), not only reveals how fiction happened to respond to nineteenth-century debates about privacy; it also illuminates the religious subtext of tw

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 暴露中的信仰:Justine S. Murison 著 Ray Horton 译(简历) 《暴露中的信仰:十九世纪美国的隐私权与世俗主义》(Faith in Exposure:Justine S. Murison 宾夕法尼亚大学出版社,2023 年 266 页。"让玛格丽特-阿特伍德再次成为小说",2016 年 1 月就职日妇女游行队伍中的一条横幅发出了这样的感叹。阿特伍德的《女仆的故事》(The Handmaid's Tale,1985 年)中吉利德的倒退状态与特朗普与基督教右翼的亲密关系所预示的未来之间的对比,揭示了美国世俗主义中的一个关键矛盾。一方面,在世俗时代,许多人通常认为宗教信仰是私人问题而非公共问题;另一方面,正如贾丝廷-穆里森(Justine Murison)在《暴露中的信仰》(Faith in Exposure)一书的导言中所说,"世俗主义与其说是宗教在公共领域的缺席......不如说是对世界的一种规定性定位"(4),这种定位假定宗教被驱逐到私人领域,即使它能使 "世俗机构保留其新教结构"(7)。女仆的故事》所引发的噩梦以及它所激发的抗议标语,都是基于这样一种危险:一些人的私人宗教信仰,通过政治和法律的公共机制,将压倒其他人所享有的隐私权,尤其是当隐私权涉及性别、性和生殖时。在《暴露中的信仰》一书中,穆里森对美国文学和文化中隐私权与世俗主义之间的这一争议地带进行了历史性的梳理,解释了 "在 19 世纪的过程中,隐私权是如何包含这种矛盾的--既是性权利和生殖权利的基础,又以宗教自由的名义破坏了这些权利"(1)。为此,穆里森关于 19 世纪宗教与隐私的详尽而有说服力的文化史,被证明是维多利亚时代的 "V21 集体 "成员称之为 "战略现世主义 "的大师级作品,这种文学史方法强调了当代的关注如何激发我们对早期问题的投入("V21 集体宣言",http://v21collective.org/manifesto-of-the-v21-collective-ten-theses/)。在穆里森看来,"对十九世纪 [第187页完] 美国小说的研究"--她称之为 "与现代主体性和个人私生活最密切相关的文学形式" (2)--不仅揭示了小说是如何回应十九世纪关于隐私权的争论的;它还揭示了二十世纪和二十一世纪关于隐私权争论的宗教潜台词,从《罗伊诉韦德案》(Roe v. Wade)(1973 年)到《奥伯丁案》(Oberford v. Wade)。韦德案》(1973 年)到《奥伯格费尔诉霍奇斯案》(2015 年),再到《多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案》(2022 年)的后果。在这一论点的背后,是对文学研究能够为世俗研究等跨学科领域提供什么的重要承诺。十九世纪的小说不仅仅揭示了十九世纪的问题,它们还为解决困扰我们今天的难题提供了资源。穆里森在全书中暗示,当我们试图找出如何让玛格丽特-阿特伍德再次成为小说时,小说本身可能会帮助我们。作为对日益壮大的后世俗批评、世俗化理论或世俗研究等领域的贡献,《暴露中的信仰》明确借鉴了其他美国学家的研究成果,比如彼得-科维洛(Peter Coviello)和贾里德-希克曼(Jared Hickman)在2014年《美国文学》特刊 "后世俗"(After the Postsecular)的导言中,宣布世俗化论题 "已死"。科维洛和希克曼认为,"后世俗""敢于建议我们可以在'世俗'之外的标志下......进行现代性思考"(649),这一研究思路提出了 "在美国文学史的语境中,世俗意味着什么"(650)。与特蕾西-费森登(Tracy Fessenden)的《文化与救赎》(普林斯顿大学出版社,2007 年)、约翰-拉达斯-摩登(John Lardas Modern)的《前美国的世俗主义》(芝加哥大学出版社,2011 年)、伊丽莎白-芬顿(Elizabeth Fenton)的《宗教自由》(牛津大学出版社,2011 年)、克劳迪娅-斯托克斯(Claudia Stokes)的《家中的祭坛》(宾夕法尼亚大学出版社,2014 年)以及阿什利-巴恩斯(Ashley Barnes)的《美国小说中的爱与深度》(弗吉尼亚大学出版社,2020 年)密切对话,《暴露中的信仰》为美国文学史增添了重要的新内容。
{"title":"Faith in Exposure: Privacy and Secularism in the Nineteenth-Century United States by Justine S. Murison (review)","authors":"Ray Horton","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a918920","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a918920","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Faith in Exposure: Privacy and Secularism in the Nineteenth-Century United States</em> by Justine S. Murison <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Ray Horton (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Faith in Exposure: Privacy and Secularism in the Nineteenth-Century United States</em><br/> <small>justine s. murison</small><br/> University of Pennsylvania Press, 2023<br/> 266 pp. <p>\"Make Margaret Atwood Fiction Again,\" exclaimed a banner at the Women's March on Inauguration Day in January 2016. One of the great protest slogans to emerge from the presidency of Donald Trump, this comparison between the regressive state of Gilead in Atwood's <em>The Handmaid's Tale</em> (1985) and the future portended by Trump's coziness with the Christian Right illuminates a key tension within American secularism. On the one hand, in a secular age, many people routinely think of religious faith as a matter of private rather than public concern; on the other hand, as Justine Murison argues in the introduction of <em>Faith in Exposure</em>, \"secularism is not so much the absence of religion from the public sphere … but is instead a prescriptive orientation to the world\" (4), one that presumes religion's banishment to the private sphere even as it enables \"secular institutions to retain their Protestant structures\" (7). The nightmare invoked by <em>The Handmaid's Tale</em> and the protest signs it inspired hinge on the danger that the private religious convictions of some, by way of the public mechanisms of politics and law, will trump the right to privacy enjoyed by others, especially where the right to privacy concerns gender, sexuality, and reproduction.</p> <p>In <em>Faith in Exposure</em>, Murison historicizes this contested terrain between privacy and secularism in American literature and culture, explaining \"how, over the course of the nineteenth century, privacy came to encompass such contradictions—underpinning the right to sexual and reproductive rights but also undermining them in the name of religious freedom\" (1). To this end, Murison's thorough and persuasive cultural history of religion and privacy in the nineteenth century proves to be a master class in what Victorianists affiliated with the V21 Collective call \"strategic presentism,\" an approach to literary history that highlights how contemporary concerns animate our investment in questions about earlier periods (\"Manifesto of the V21 Collective,\" http://v21collective.org/manifesto-of-the-v21-collective-ten-theses/). For Murison, \"a study of the nineteenth-century <strong>[End Page 187]</strong> American novel,\" which she calls \"the literary form most closely associated with modern subjectivity and the private lives of individuals\" (2), not only reveals how fiction happened to respond to nineteenth-century debates about privacy; it also illuminates the religious subtext of tw","PeriodicalId":44043,"journal":{"name":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139766585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The First Reconstruction: Black Politics in America from the Revolution to the Civil War by Van Gosse (review) 第一次重建:从革命到内战的美国黑人政治》(Van Gosse 著)(评论
IF 0.3 3区 文学 Q2 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI: 10.1353/eal.2024.a918919
Aston Gonzalez
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • The First Reconstruction: Black Politics in America from the Revolution to the Civil War by Van Gosse
  • Aston Gonzalez (bio)
The First Reconstruction: Black Politics in America from the Revolution to the Civil War
van gosse
University of North Carolina Press, 2021
760 pp.

With the publication of The First Reconstruction, scholars now have a more comprehensive resource to study the role that free African American men in some northern states played in voting and contributing to party politics before the Civil War. Time and again, Van Gosse [End Page 181] demonstrates that electoral wins hinged on securing the ballots cast by African American men in several northern city, county, and state elections during the early Republic. Gosse provides abundant evidence that African American men voted and participated in electoral politics. He details how they recorded their own participation and also how white allies and adversaries positioned the promises and perceived perils of Black voters within changing two- and three-party systems that sometimes operated quite differently across state lines. Gosse avoids sectional generalizations and organizes the book according to the four polities of Pennsylvania, upper New England, New York, and Ohio. The contours of Black politics look different in each area, shaped as they were by preexisting laws, specific goals of political parties, diverse legal structures, and other contingent circumstances of the local populations. What comes into focus is how African American voters maneuvered strategically within and between political parties—Federalist, Whig, Democratic, Liberty, Free Soil, and Republican—in an attempt to secure improved outcomes for themselves and to try to elect politicians who supported their interests.

In a strong narrative voice, Gosse argues that these histories of dynamic Black politics in select northern enclaves have been overlooked for several reasons. First, he stridently writes that "we [scholars] have all been Taneyites" (referring to Supreme Court Justice Roger Taney, who wrote the majority opinion in the 1857 Dred Scott v. Sandford decision) who have assumed and "insisted that black citizenship barely, rarely, or never existed" before taking aim at scholars' expansive understanding of "politics" to include African American agency beyond the ballot box. This, he argues, results in social history without the "old-style political history" (9). In response, Gosse narrows the scope of what counts as "politics" in order to focus on elections, voting, and political parties. The view presented in the book is exclusively male with a handful of references to Black women's presence. Second, two competing historiograph

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 The First Reconstruction:从革命到内战的美国黑人政治》(The First Reconstruction: Black Politics in America from the Revolution to the Civil War),作者:Van Gosse Aston Gonzalez(简历):美国从革命到南北战争时期的黑人政治》(The First Reconstruction: Black Politics in America from the Revolution to the Civil War van Gosse),北卡罗来纳大学出版社,2021 年,760 页。随着《第一次重建》的出版,学者们现在有了更全面的资源来研究南北战争前北方一些州的自由非裔美国男子在投票和政党政治中发挥的作用。范-高斯 [尾页 181]一再证明,在共和国早期的几次北方市、县和州选举中,选举获胜取决于能否获得非裔美国人的选票。高斯提供了大量非裔美国人投票和参与选举政治的证据。他详细描述了他们如何记录自己的参与情况,以及白人盟友和对手如何在不断变化的两党和三党制度中定位黑人选民的承诺和感知到的危险。高斯避免了以偏概全,而是按照宾夕法尼亚州、上新英格兰地区、纽约州和俄亥俄州这四个政体来组织全书。黑人政治的轮廓在每个地区都不尽相同,因为它们是由先前存在的法律、政党的特定目标、不同的法律结构以及当地人口的其他偶然情况所决定的。重点在于非裔美国人选民如何在各政党内部和政党之间进行战略周旋--联邦党、辉格党、民主党、自由党、自由土壤党和共和党--试图为自己争取更好的结果,并努力选出支持他们利益的政治家。高斯以铿锵有力的叙事语调指出,由于多种原因,这些在选定的北方飞地中活跃的黑人政治历史被忽视了。首先,他直言不讳地写道,"我们(学者)都是塔尼派"(指最高法院大法官罗杰-塔尼,他在 1857 年的 "德雷德-斯科特诉桑福德案 "判决中撰写了多数意见),他们假定并 "坚持认为黑人公民权几乎不存在、很少存在或从未存在过",然后他针对学者们对 "政治 "的扩展性理解,将非裔美国人的能动性纳入投票箱之外。他认为,这导致社会史没有 "旧式的政治史"(9)。作为回应,高斯缩小了 "政治 "的范围,将重点放在选举、投票和政党上。书中提出的观点完全是男性的观点,只有少数几处提到了黑人女性的存在。其次,书中讨论的两个相互竞争的史学发展为非裔美国男性的政治文化留下了很小的空间。这两大阵营--由阿瑟-施莱辛格(Arthur Schlesinger)和戈登-伍德(Gordon Wood)提出的杰斐逊-杰克逊国家进步论,以及后来受到亚历山大-萨克斯顿(Alexander Saxton)、戴维-罗迪格(David Roediger)和唐-E-费伦巴赫(Don E. Fehrenbacher)的质疑,他们认为奴隶制、反黑人种族主义和对土著人的虐待是国家发展的基础--掩盖了非裔美国人在选票和政党历史中的存在。高斯将自己定位在这两个阵营中的任何一方,而将重点放在他们所忽视的方面。高斯主要通过使用传统资料,包括人口普查数据、报纸、国会和立法辩论以及各州的制宪会议,重构了一部丰富而精彩的黑人政治史。仅举一例,高斯对人口普查手稿进行了细致入微的解读,解释了民主党人口普查员少计黑人财产价值,以此来减少黑人共和党选民的比例(448)。然而,报纸是本书的主要历史资料来源,高斯对报纸中的党派活动进行了仔细分析,揭示了上新英格兰地区令人难以置信的选举政治的详细记录。当其他资料类型没有记录黑人男子的党派活动时,高斯主要通过衡量他们在白人报纸和后来的黑人报纸上的存在来确定他们的党派活动。在使用这种方法策略时,他还撇开了贯穿于十九世纪早期白人报纸文章中的反黑人种族主义,在一定程度上了解了黑人男性参与党派政治的情况。在后面的章节中,有关黑人男性的通信和与黑人男性的通信变得更加突出。高斯以煞费苦心的细节描写了幕后交易、策略制定和隐喻棋局。
{"title":"The First Reconstruction: Black Politics in America from the Revolution to the Civil War by Van Gosse (review)","authors":"Aston Gonzalez","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a918919","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a918919","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The First Reconstruction: Black Politics in America from the Revolution to the Civil War</em> by Van Gosse <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Aston Gonzalez (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The First Reconstruction: Black Politics in America from the Revolution to the Civil War</em><br/> <small>van gosse</small><br/> University of North Carolina Press, 2021<br/> 760 pp. <p>With the publication of <em>The First Reconstruction</em>, scholars now have a more comprehensive resource to study the role that free African American men in some northern states played in voting and contributing to party politics before the Civil War. Time and again, Van Gosse <strong>[End Page 181]</strong> demonstrates that electoral wins hinged on securing the ballots cast by African American men in several northern city, county, and state elections during the early Republic. Gosse provides abundant evidence that African American men voted and participated in electoral politics. He details how they recorded their own participation and also how white allies and adversaries positioned the promises and perceived perils of Black voters within changing two- and three-party systems that sometimes operated quite differently across state lines. Gosse avoids sectional generalizations and organizes the book according to the four polities of Pennsylvania, upper New England, New York, and Ohio. The contours of Black politics look different in each area, shaped as they were by preexisting laws, specific goals of political parties, diverse legal structures, and other contingent circumstances of the local populations. What comes into focus is how African American voters maneuvered strategically within and between political parties—Federalist, Whig, Democratic, Liberty, Free Soil, and Republican—in an attempt to secure improved outcomes for themselves and to try to elect politicians who supported their interests.</p> <p>In a strong narrative voice, Gosse argues that these histories of dynamic Black politics in select northern enclaves have been overlooked for several reasons. First, he stridently writes that \"we [scholars] have all been Taneyites\" (referring to Supreme Court Justice Roger Taney, who wrote the majority opinion in the 1857 <em>Dred Scott v. Sandford</em> decision) who have assumed and \"insisted that black citizenship barely, rarely, or never existed\" before taking aim at scholars' expansive understanding of \"politics\" to include African American agency beyond the ballot box. This, he argues, results in social history without the \"old-style <em>political</em> history\" (9). In response, Gosse narrows the scope of what counts as \"politics\" in order to focus on elections, voting, and political parties. The view presented in the book is exclusively male with a handful of references to Black women's presence. Second, two competing historiograph","PeriodicalId":44043,"journal":{"name":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139766590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fugitive Texts: Slave Narratives in Antebellum Print Culture by Michaël Roy (review) 逃亡文本:Michaël Roy 所著的《逃亡文本:前贝尔蒙时期印刷文化中的奴隶叙事》(评论)
IF 0.3 3区 文学 Q2 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI: 10.1353/eal.2024.a918925
Bryan Sinche
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Fugitive Texts: Slave Narratives in Antebellum Print Culture by Michaël Roy
  • Bryan Sinche (bio)
Fugitive Texts: Slave Narratives in Antebellum Print Culture
michaël roy; translated by susan pickford
University of Wisconsin Press, 2022
222 pp.

Following in the wake of scholarly leaders like I. Garland Penn, Dorothy Porter, and Marian Starling came a new generation of Black print culture specialists who have expanded and shaped the field. Articles and books by William L. Andrews, John Ernest, P. Gabrielle Foreman, Frances Smith Foster, Eric Gardner, Leon Jackson, and Joycelyn Moody—along with the emergence of searchable digital databases—have helped inspire a flurry of scholarship that shows no signs of abating. To wit: Benjamin Fagan's The Black Newspaper and the Chosen Nation (U of Georgia P, 2016), Gardner's Black Print Unbound (Oxford UP, 2015), and Derrick Spires's The Practice of Citizenship (U of Pennsylvania P, 2019) have fueled an interest in Black newspapers and periodicals, and collections like Early African American Print Culture (ed. Lara Langer Cohen and Jordan Alexander Stein [U of Pennsylvania P, 2012]), The Colored Conventions Movement (ed. Jim Casey, P. Gabrielle Foreman, and Sarah Patterson [U of North Carolina P, 2021]), and Against a Sharp White Background (Brigette Fielder and Jonathan Senchyne [U of Wisconsin P, 2019]) have further expanded our understanding of the genres and forms in which African American writing appeared. The effect of much of this work has been to reconsider the role of the slave narrative in pre-1900 African American literature. Michaël Roy's Fugitive Texts: Slave Narratives in Antebellum Print Culture helps to further this critical project by attending to the materiality and diversity of antebellum narratives.

Roy's monograph is a revised version of Textes Fugitifs, first published in France in 2017. The American edition, translated by Susan Pickford, [End Page 210] updates the scholarly apparatus, but it is largely unchanged from the 2017 publication that won the research prize of the Association Française D'Études Américaines. As Roy notes, his book fills a major gap in African American literary scholarship, as it is the first monograph focused on the printing, distribution, circulation, sale, and reception of the texts we have come to call "slave narratives." Moreover, Roy complicates that term throughout Fugitive Texts, arguing that to understand the genre in all its complexity, we must attend to the narratives' publication histories. Roy argues that a "book history approach to the antebellum slave narratives … illuminat

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:审稿人: 逃亡文本:作者:Michaël Roy Bryan Sinche(简历) 《逃亡文本:前贝鲁姆印刷文化中的奴隶叙事》(Fugitive Texts:米夏埃尔-罗伊;苏珊-皮克福德译 威斯康星大学出版社,2022 年 222 页。继 I. Garland Penn、Dorothy Porter 和 Marian Starling 等学术带头人之后,新一代黑人印刷文化专家的出现拓展并塑造了这一领域。威廉-安德鲁斯(William L. Andrews)、约翰-欧内斯特(John Ernest)、P-加布里埃尔-福尔曼(P. Gabrielle Foreman)、弗朗西斯-史密斯-福斯特(Frances Smith Foster)、埃里克-加德纳(Eric Gardner)、莱昂-杰克逊(Leon Jackson)和乔伊斯琳-穆迪(Joycelyn Moody)等人的文章和著作,以及可搜索数字数据库的出现,激发了学术研究的热潮,而且这种热潮丝毫没有减退的迹象。例如Benjamin Fagan 的《The Black Newspaper and the Chosen Nation》(佐治亚大学出版社,2016 年)、Gardner 的《Black Print Unbound》(牛津大学出版社,2015 年)和 Derrick Spires 的《The Practice of Citizenship》(宾夕法尼亚大学出版社,2019 年)激发了人们对黑人报纸和期刊的兴趣,《Early African American Print Culture》(编辑:Lara Langer Cohen 和 Jordan Moody)等文集也受到了广泛关注。Lara Langer Cohen 和 Jordan Alexander Stein [宾夕法尼亚大学出版社,2012 年])、《有色人种会议运动》(Jim Casey、P. Gabrielle Foreman 和 Sarah Patterson [北卡罗来纳大学出版社,2021 年])和《鲜明的白色背景》(Brigette Fielder 和 Jonathan Senchyne [威斯康星大学出版社,2019 年])等文集进一步扩大了我们对非裔美国人写作的体裁和形式的了解。这些著作的大部分效果是重新考虑了奴隶叙事在 1900 年前的美国黑人文学中的作用。Michaël Roy 的《逃亡文本》(Fugitive Texts:通过关注前贝鲁姆时期叙事的物质性和多样性,有助于推进这一批评项目。罗伊的专著是2017年首次在法国出版的《逃亡文本》(Textes Fugitifs)的修订版。美国版由苏珊-皮克福德(Susan Pickford)翻译[第210页完],更新了学术装置,但与 2017 年出版的版本基本保持一致,后者曾获得法国美国研究协会的研究奖。正如罗伊所言,他的这本书填补了非裔美国人文学研究的一大空白,因为它是第一本专注于我们称之为 "奴隶叙事 "的文本的印刷、发行、流通、销售和接受的专著。此外,罗伊在《逃亡文本》中将这一术语复杂化,认为要理解这一体裁的复杂性,我们必须关注叙事的出版史。罗伊认为,"用图书史的方法来研究前贝鲁姆奴隶叙事......可以揭示通常被视为同质整体的叙事的异质性"(9)。罗伊通过关注两个关键因素来形成自己的论点:叙事出版的年代和出版模式。正如罗伊所解释的,这些因素与 19 世纪 30 年代、40 年代和 50 年代出版的叙事作品密切相关,罗伊的三个章节将历史背景与这三个年代的出版案例研究相结合。罗伊的第一章关注的是 19 世纪 30 年代在主要废奴组织,尤其是美国反奴隶制协会(AASS)的主持(或支持)下出版的奴隶叙事。正如罗伊所指出的,1830 年前美国出版了一些奴隶叙事诗,但所有这些叙事诗都是自行出版的,因此是在当地而非全国范围内流传。这种发行模式的一个例外--大卫-沃克的《向世界有色人种公民的呼吁》(1829 年)--不是奴隶叙事,而且沃克的小册子依靠的是一种独特的发行方式(由水手偷运到南方),这对大多数作者或出版商来说都是不可行的。即便如此,沃克这本具有煽动性的小册子所引发的歇斯底里证实了印刷品对于新成立的废奴组织的力量,19 世纪 30 年代中后期,美国废奴协会试图用反奴隶制出版物覆盖全国。作为这场运动的一部分,美国废奴协会决定在 1838 年出版发行《詹姆斯-威廉姆斯的叙述》。对威廉姆斯叙述的大多数批评都集中在支持奴隶制的南方人所引发的争议上,他们对威廉姆斯故事的某些方面提出了质疑,从而削弱了威廉姆斯故事的政治效力,但罗伊通过关注...
{"title":"Fugitive Texts: Slave Narratives in Antebellum Print Culture by Michaël Roy (review)","authors":"Bryan Sinche","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a918925","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a918925","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Fugitive Texts: Slave Narratives in Antebellum Print Culture</em> by Michaël Roy <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Bryan Sinche (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Fugitive Texts: Slave Narratives in Antebellum Print Culture</em><br/> <small>michaël roy</small>; <small>translated by</small> <small>susan pickford</small><br/> University of Wisconsin Press, 2022<br/> 222 pp. <p>Following in the wake of scholarly leaders like I. Garland Penn, Dorothy Porter, and Marian Starling came a new generation of Black print culture specialists who have expanded and shaped the field. Articles and books by William L. Andrews, John Ernest, P. Gabrielle Foreman, Frances Smith Foster, Eric Gardner, Leon Jackson, and Joycelyn Moody—along with the emergence of searchable digital databases—have helped inspire a flurry of scholarship that shows no signs of abating. To wit: Benjamin Fagan's <em>The Black Newspaper and the Chosen Nation</em> (U of Georgia P, 2016), Gardner's <em>Black Print Unbound</em> (Oxford UP, 2015), and Derrick Spires's <em>The Practice of Citizenship</em> (U of Pennsylvania P, 2019) have fueled an interest in Black newspapers and periodicals, and collections like <em>Early African American Print Culture</em> (ed. Lara Langer Cohen and Jordan Alexander Stein [U of Pennsylvania P, 2012]), <em>The Colored Conventions Movement</em> (ed. Jim Casey, P. Gabrielle Foreman, and Sarah Patterson [U of North Carolina P, 2021]), and <em>Against a Sharp White Background</em> (Brigette Fielder and Jonathan Senchyne [U of Wisconsin P, 2019]) have further expanded our understanding of the genres and forms in which African American writing appeared. The effect of much of this work has been to reconsider the role of the slave narrative in pre-1900 African American literature. Michaël Roy's <em>Fugitive Texts</em>: <em>Slave Narratives in Antebellum Print Culture</em> helps to further this critical project by attending to the materiality and diversity of antebellum narratives.</p> <p>Roy's monograph is a revised version of <em>Textes Fugitifs</em>, first published in France in 2017. The American edition, translated by Susan Pickford, <strong>[End Page 210]</strong> updates the scholarly apparatus, but it is largely unchanged from the 2017 publication that won the research prize of the Association Française D'Études Américaines. As Roy notes, his book fills a major gap in African American literary scholarship, as it is the first monograph focused on the printing, distribution, circulation, sale, and reception of the texts we have come to call \"slave narratives.\" Moreover, Roy complicates that term throughout <em>Fugitive Texts</em>, arguing that to understand the genre in all its complexity, we must attend to the narratives' publication histories. Roy argues that a \"book history approach to the antebellum slave narratives … illuminat","PeriodicalId":44043,"journal":{"name":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139766591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Convulsed States: Earthquakes, Prophecy, and the Remaking of Early America by Jonathan Todd Hancock (review) 震荡的国家:地震、预言和早期美国的重塑》,乔纳森-托德-汉考克著(评论)
IF 0.3 3区 文学 Q2 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI: 10.1353/eal.2024.a918921
Scott M. Larson
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Convulsed States: Earthquakes, Prophecy, and the Remaking of Early America by Jonathan Todd Hancock
  • Scott M. Larson (bio)
Convulsed States: Earthquakes, Prophecy, and the Remaking of Early America
jonathan todd hancock
University of North Carolina Press, 2021
186 pp.

Beginning in December 1811, a series of powerful earthquakes shook New Madrid, Missouri. The tremblors were physically felt for hundreds of miles, and in Convulsed States: Earthquakes, Prophecy, and the Remaking of Early America, Jonathan Todd Hancock aims to explore the wide-ranging impacts of these quakes among Native American societies and the young United States. Relatively few people died in the New Madrid earthquakes, particularly in comparison with the destruction of massive quakes that struck Lima, Peru, and Lisbon, Portugal in the eighteenth century, which themselves prompted extensive religious and natural scientific inquiries. The New Madrid quakes nevertheless threw the land and its inhabitants into turmoil. Since the earthquakes occurred alongside the Comet of 1811, the Richmond Theatre fire of 1811, and escalating United States military engagements with Native American and European powers, interpreters saw the 1811–12 tremblors as signs connected to national, moral, and political upheaval. Some considered them fulfillments of dire prophecies. Hancock explores the range of meanings that were ascribed to the earthquakes and "probes those meanings to provide a continental, cross-cultural perspective on prophecy and revivalism, state formations, and understandings of environmental change across Native American, African American, and Euro American societies in the early nineteenth century" (3).

Beyond the immediate events of the earthquakes, which occurred between December 1811 and February 1812 and consisted primarily of three powerful tremors estimated at 7.0 on the Richter scale, the book is divided thematically, tackling the different arenas in which the earthquakes were understood and its influences felt. Hancock organizes the book into sections on "knowledge," "spirit," "politics," and "territory," and within each of these chapters, Hancock gives attention to the conflicting and overlapping ways that a range of American actors engaged the earthquakes. This approach offers a diverse view of early American cultural responses to [End Page 192] the earthquakes. Hancock draws on a wide range of both published and unpublished primary sources, and he is careful to note that many of the primary accounts of the earthquakes were unreliable and that some were published for sensation rather than for veracity. Hancock also attends to ethical considerations of engaging Indigenous knowledge, reminding the reader

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:审稿人: 震荡的国家:乔纳森-托德-汉考克(Jonathan Todd Hancock)著,斯科特-M.-拉森(Scott M. Larson)(简历)译:《震荡的国家:地震、预言和早期美国的重塑》(Convulsed States:地震、预言和早期美国的重塑》(Convulsed States: Earthquakes, Prophecy, and the Remaking of Early America),乔纳森-托德-汉考克(Jonathan Todd Hancock)著,北卡罗来纳大学出版社,2021 年,186 页。从 1811 年 12 月开始,密苏里州新马德里发生了一系列强烈地震。数百英里范围内的人们都能感受到地震的震感,《震荡之州》(Convulsed States)一书也是如此:乔纳森-托德-汉考克(Jonathan Todd Hancock)在《地震、预言和早期美国的重塑》(Convulsed States: Earthquakes, Prophecy, and the Remaking of Early America)一书中,旨在探讨这些地震对美洲原住民社会和年轻的美国产生的广泛影响。新马德里地震造成的死亡人数相对较少,尤其是与 18 世纪袭击秘鲁利马和葡萄牙里斯本的大地震造成的破坏相比。然而,新马德里地震还是使这片土地及其居民陷入了混乱之中。由于地震是与 1811 年彗星、1811 年里士满剧院大火以及美国与美洲原住民和欧洲列强不断升级的军事冲突同时发生的,因此解释者将 1811-12 年的地震视为与国家、道德和政治动荡有关的征兆。一些人认为它们应验了可怕的预言。汉考克探讨了地震的一系列含义,并 "探究了这些含义,为 19 世纪早期美洲原住民、非洲裔美国人和欧洲裔美国人社会的预言和复兴主义、国家形成以及对环境变化的理解提供了一个大陆性、跨文化的视角"(3)。地震发生在 1811 年 12 月至 1812 年 2 月之间,主要包括三次里氏 7.0 级的强烈震动,除了地震的直接事件外,本书还按主题划分,探讨了人们理解地震及其影响的不同领域。汉考克将全书分为 "知识"、"精神"、"政治 "和 "领土 "等章节,在每个章节中,汉考克都关注了一系列美国参与者参与地震的相互冲突和重叠的方式。这种方法提供了早期美国文化对地震的不同反应。汉考克利用了大量已出版和未出版的原始资料,他谨慎地指出,许多关于地震的原始记载并不可靠,有些记载是为了轰动效应而非真实性而出版的。汉考克还注意到运用土著知识时的道德考量,提醒读者 "医学,正如当代部落社区所说的秘密做法,是精神生活的根本,是一个非常敏感的话题,属于特殊从业者的家族和世系,而不是好奇的外来者"(4)。在提请人们注意这些界限的同时,汉考克在书中将大部分篇幅放在了原住民对地震的解释上,这是对地震和其他自然灾害历史研究的有力贡献,例如德博拉-库恩(Deborah Coen)的《地震观测者》(The Earthquake Observers):从里斯本到里希特的灾害科学》(芝加哥大学出版社,2012 年)。事实上,该书最重要的一些贡献来自于对美洲原住民对地震的广泛看法的研究,地震有时被概念化为自然周期的一部分,有时则被理解为对人类行为的惩罚或警告(38-39)。汉考克探讨了肖尼族领袖滕斯克瓦塔瓦(Tenskwatawa)和他的兄弟特库姆塞(Tecumseh)等人如何利用新马德里地震的预言和意义创造来建立精神和军事力量。其他学术著作,如 R. David Edmunds 的《肖尼族先知》(内布拉斯加大学,1983 年)和 Adam Jortner 的《先知镇的诸神》(牛津大学,2011 年),都将滕斯克瓦塔瓦和特库姆塞视为不同的人物,有时甚至是相互竞争的人物,而汉考克则将两兄弟视为一个整体和运动,他称之为 "肖尼兄弟"。汉考克认为,滕斯克瓦塔瓦曾在 1808 年预言过地震,而预言在 1811-12 年似乎应验了,这可能使他呼吁部落间军事抵抗白人定居的呼声更加可信。他认为这些现象是要求净化白人文化的迹象,如酒精、欧洲教育、服饰和土地占有,以及停止与美国或欧洲国家结盟。尽管滕斯克瓦塔瓦声称自己具有预言和精神力量,并对俄亥俄地区大量好战的美洲原住民产生了影响...
{"title":"Convulsed States: Earthquakes, Prophecy, and the Remaking of Early America by Jonathan Todd Hancock (review)","authors":"Scott M. Larson","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a918921","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a918921","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Convulsed States: Earthquakes, Prophecy, and the Remaking of Early America</em> by Jonathan Todd Hancock <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Scott M. Larson (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Convulsed States: Earthquakes, Prophecy, and the Remaking of Early America</em><br/> <small>jonathan todd hancock</small><br/> University of North Carolina Press, 2021<br/> 186 pp. <p>Beginning in December 1811, a series of powerful earthquakes shook New Madrid, Missouri. The tremblors were physically felt for hundreds of miles, and in <em>Convulsed States: Earthquakes, Prophecy, and the Remaking of Early America</em>, Jonathan Todd Hancock aims to explore the wide-ranging impacts of these quakes among Native American societies and the young United States. Relatively few people died in the New Madrid earthquakes, particularly in comparison with the destruction of massive quakes that struck Lima, Peru, and Lisbon, Portugal in the eighteenth century, which themselves prompted extensive religious and natural scientific inquiries. The New Madrid quakes nevertheless threw the land and its inhabitants into turmoil. Since the earthquakes occurred alongside the Comet of 1811, the Richmond Theatre fire of 1811, and escalating United States military engagements with Native American and European powers, interpreters saw the 1811–12 tremblors as signs connected to national, moral, and political upheaval. Some considered them fulfillments of dire prophecies. Hancock explores the range of meanings that were ascribed to the earthquakes and \"probes those meanings to provide a continental, cross-cultural perspective on prophecy and revivalism, state formations, and understandings of environmental change across Native American, African American, and Euro American societies in the early nineteenth century\" (3).</p> <p>Beyond the immediate events of the earthquakes, which occurred between December 1811 and February 1812 and consisted primarily of three powerful tremors estimated at 7.0 on the Richter scale, the book is divided thematically, tackling the different arenas in which the earthquakes were understood and its influences felt. Hancock organizes the book into sections on \"knowledge,\" \"spirit,\" \"politics,\" and \"territory,\" and within each of these chapters, Hancock gives attention to the conflicting and overlapping ways that a range of American actors engaged the earthquakes. This approach offers a diverse view of early American cultural responses to <strong>[End Page 192]</strong> the earthquakes. Hancock draws on a wide range of both published and unpublished primary sources, and he is careful to note that many of the primary accounts of the earthquakes were unreliable and that some were published for sensation rather than for veracity. Hancock also attends to ethical considerations of engaging Indigenous knowledge, reminding the reader ","PeriodicalId":44043,"journal":{"name":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139766612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The 2023 SEA Common Reading Forum: On Toni Morrison's A Mercy 2023 年海协共读论坛:论托尼-莫里森的《怜悯
IF 0.3 3区 文学 Q2 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI: 10.1353/eal.2024.a918907
Anna Brickhouse, April Langley, Kaitlin Tonti
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • The 2023 SEA Common Reading ForumOn Toni Morrison's A Mercy
  • Anna Brickhouse (bio), April Langley (bio), and Kaitlin Tonti (bio)

a mercy

if you don't read this no one will.(one question: can you read?)this story begins in a language Ican't recall but I will tryto build a house of wordsanyway. it is the only way.on the cobblestones of umamemória portuguesa a minha mãeheld close to one life as the otherdrifted away. it was the only way.someone says dominion is wickedbut what she doesn't understand isthat the wilderness inside can bewicked, too. the wilderness ofletting go. so there is no protection herebut there is difference and if I can justremember the contours of thisportuguese memory it will makeall the difference. a man lovedme once, minha mãe, and so toodid women, but he shatteredat the dying inside and the others,at the dying without. those whopray to god say it is the only way.I say it is cruel. unforgiving.(another question: who is responsible?) [End Page 95] so in a moment like the crackingof creation my feathers unfoldedand I too became unforgiving.unforgiven. it was no miracle,minha mãe. it was simply the only way.my company now is the words that caress meand the darkness that thickens butdon't be afraid. if you don't readthis no one will and before it burnsI want you to understand:my soul is hard as cypress nowand I am free at last. I last.oh minha mãe. meu amor.hear a Florens. in full.this is the only wayand I last.

—Madeline Stokes

The poem above, by undergraduate Madeline Stokes (University of Virginia), represents one product of the SEA's 2023 Common Reading Initiative. The initiative is still new, imagined and then created in the year leading up to the 2021 conference by Cassander Smith, Brigitte Fielder, and Tara Bynum. These scholars and others, taking on the project of "conference organizing for change," aimed to create a sense of community centered on a single text while also broadening the intellectual approaches and perspectives shaping the SEA—including those of contemporary writers as well as scholars and undergraduate and graduate students focused on other periods. In 2023 the organizing text was

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 2023 年东南欧共同阅读论坛关于托尼-莫里森的《怜悯》安娜-布里克豪斯(Anna Brickhouse)(简历)、艾普尔-兰利(April Langley)(简历)和凯特琳-汤蒂(Kaitlin Tonti)(简历)《怜悯》如果你不读这本书,就没人会读。(一个问题:你识字吗?)这个故事以一种我记不起来的语言开始,但我会尝试用文字搭建一座房子。有人说统治是邪恶的,但她不明白的是,内心的荒野也可能是邪恶的,是放任自流的荒野。 所以这里没有保护,但有区别,如果我能记住这段葡萄牙记忆的轮廓,那将会有很大的不同。一个男人曾经爱过我,我的爱人,还有其他女人,但他在内心的死亡中破碎了,而其他人,在没有内心的死亡中破碎了。 那些向上帝祈祷的人说这是唯一的办法,而我说这是残酷的,不可饶恕的(另一个问题:谁该负责? ) [第95页结束] 所以,在一个像创造的裂缝一样的时刻,我的羽毛展开了,我也变得不可饶恕。这不是奇迹,亲爱的,这是唯一的办法 现在陪伴我的是爱抚我的话语和越来越浓的黑暗 但不要害怕,如果你不读这本书,就没人会读了 在它燃烧之前,我想让你明白 我的灵魂像柏树一样坚硬,我终于自由了我终于,哦,我的爱人,我的爱人,听一听弗洛伦斯的歌吧,完全地,这是唯一的办法,我终于,我终于,哦,我的爱人,听一听弗洛伦斯的歌吧,完全地,这是唯一的办法,我终于。玛德琳-斯托克斯(Madeline Stokes) 上面这首诗的作者是弗吉尼亚大学本科生玛德琳-斯托克斯(Madeline Stokes),是东南大学 2023 年共同阅读计划的一个成果。该倡议尚属新生事物,是由卡桑德-史密斯(Cassander Smith)、布里吉特-菲尔德(Brigitte Fielder)和塔拉-拜纳姆(Tara Bynum)在 2021 年会议召开前的一年里想象并创作的。这些学者和其他人承担了 "组织会议促进变革 "的项目,旨在以单一文本为中心创造一种社区感,同时拓宽塑造 SEA 的知识方法和视角--包括当代作家以及关注其他时期的学者、本科生和研究生的知识方法和视角。2023 年的组织文本是诺贝尔文学奖得主托尼-莫里森(Toni Morrison)的《宽恕》(A Mercy),这是一部关于美国殖民地的令人难忘的小说。作为该计划的一部分,美国各地的东南欧教育协会成员在不同层次的课堂上讲授了这部小说,并探讨了其中经久不衰的问题。玛蒂-斯托克斯(Maddie Stokes)在她的诗歌和随诗提交的思考中探讨了其中的一些问题。这首诗基于她作为读者所遇到的问题:为什么小说的主人公只是 "铁匠"?"她问道:"如果弗洛伦斯试图弥合自己与母亲之间的鸿沟,即小说结尾留下的'唯一的悲伤',那么叙事会发生怎样的变化?这首诗就是我回答这个问题的实验[第 96 页完]。实际上,它是试图通过弗洛伦斯的声音,向弗洛伦斯的母亲重述小说的故事"。正如麦迪所言,弗洛伦斯是 "一个生活在不同文化、语言和权力结构之间的人物",而在早期美国文学课堂上,其中一些文化、语言和权力结构较少受到关注。为了思考小说中 "葡萄牙语记忆 "的意义,麦迪需要考虑和参考英语以外的语言,莫里森也是这样做的,而且她自己对英语口语和书面语的熟练程度也受到了限制。麦迪自己选择了这一小小的练习,以认识美洲大量的口语和书面语--包括那些已经失传的语言,正如弗洛伦斯不仅失去了她的母亲,还在被迫适应英语的过程中失去了她母亲的大部分葡萄牙语,以及她母亲的所有非洲母语。在弗洛伦斯的叙述中,语言的丧失和习得层层递进,"仁慈 "究竟意味着什么?
{"title":"The 2023 SEA Common Reading Forum: On Toni Morrison's A Mercy","authors":"Anna Brickhouse, April Langley, Kaitlin Tonti","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a918907","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a918907","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> The 2023 SEA Common Reading Forum<span>On Toni Morrison's <em>A Mercy</em></span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Anna Brickhouse (bio), April Langley (bio), and Kaitlin Tonti (bio) </li> </ul> <h2>a mercy</h2> <blockquote> <p><span>if you don't read this no one will.</span><span>(one question: can you read?)</span><span>this story begins in a language I</span><span>can't recall but I will try</span><span>to build a house of words</span><span>anyway. it is the only way.</span><span>on the cobblestones of <em>uma</em></span><span><em>memória portuguesa a minha mãe</em></span><span>held close to one life as the other</span><span>drifted away. it was the only way.</span><span>someone says dominion is wicked</span><span>but what she doesn't understand is</span><span>that the wilderness inside can be</span><span>wicked, too. the wilderness of</span><span>letting go. so there is no protection here</span><span>but there is difference and if I can just</span><span>remember the contours of this</span><span>portuguese memory it will make</span><span>all the difference. a man loved</span><span>me once, <em>minha mãe</em>, and so too</span><span>did women, but he shattered</span><span>at the dying inside and the others,</span><span>at the dying without. those who</span><span>pray to god say it is the only way.</span><span>I say it is cruel. unforgiving.</span><span>(another question: who is responsible?) <strong>[End Page 95]</strong></span> <span>so in a moment like the cracking</span><span>of creation my feathers unfolded</span><span>and I too became unforgiving.</span><span>unforgiven. it was no miracle,</span><span><em>minha mãe</em>. it was simply the only way.</span><span>my company now is the words that caress me</span><span>and the darkness that thickens but</span><span>don't be afraid. if you don't read</span><span>this no one will and before it burns</span><span>I want you to understand:</span><span>my soul is hard as cypress now</span><span>and I am free at last. I last.</span><span><em>oh minha mãe. meu amor</em>.</span><span>hear a Florens. in full.</span><span>this is the only way</span><span>and I last.</span></p> —Madeline Stokes </blockquote> <p>The poem above, by undergraduate Madeline Stokes (University of Virginia), represents one product of the SEA's 2023 Common Reading Initiative. The initiative is still new, imagined and then created in the year leading up to the 2021 conference by Cassander Smith, Brigitte Fielder, and Tara Bynum. These scholars and others, taking on the project of \"conference organizing for change,\" aimed to create a sense of community centered on a single text while also broadening the intellectual approaches and perspectives shaping the SEA—including those of contemporary writers as well as scholars and undergraduate and graduate students focused on other periods. In 2023 the organizing text was","PeriodicalId":44043,"journal":{"name":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139766493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley: A Poet's Journeys through American Slavery and Independence by David Waldstreicher (review) 菲利斯-惠特利的奥德赛:诗人穿越美国奴隶制和独立的旅程》,作者 David Waldstreicher(评论)
IF 0.3 3区 文学 Q2 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI: 10.1353/eal.2024.a918914
Vincent Carretta
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley: A Poet's Journeys through American Slavery and Independence by David Waldstreicher
  • Vincent Carretta (bio)
The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley: A Poet's Journeys through American Slavery and Independence
david waldstreicher
Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2023
480 pp.

The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley: A Poet's Journeys through American Slavery and Independence, by David Waldstreicher, Distinguished Professor of History at CUNY, is both timely and necessary. Timely because his is one of two biographies published during the 250th anniversary of Wheatley Peters's annus mirabilis, the year in which she both published Poems on Various Subjects, Religious and Moral and gained her freedom; necessary because of Cornelia H. Dayton's most significant biographical discoveries about her later life and marriage found since the publication in 2011 of the first full-length biography of the poet (Dayton, "Lost Years Recovered: John Peters and Phillis Wheatley Peters in Middleton," New England Quarterly, vol. 94, 2021). Waldstreicher's biography is also a major contribution to the recent fictional, critical, pedagogical, and scholarly attention Wheatley Peters has received in Honorée Fannone Jeffers's imaginative biography in verse, The Age of Phillis (Wesleyan UP, 2020); a special issue of Early American Literature (vol. 57, no. 3, 2022); a new attribution argument by Wendy Raphael Roberts (Early American Literature, vol. 58, no. 1, 2023); my revised edition of The Writings of Phillis Wheatley Peters [End Page 154] (Oxford UP, 2024); and my revised Phillis Wheatley Peters: Biography of a Genius in Bondage (U of Georgia P, 2023).

By publishing The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley with a nonacademic press, Waldstreicher will make more widely available a portrait of Wheatley Peters and her times familiar to the readers of Early American Literature who have followed the biographical, critical, and editorial work on her published in more academic venues during the past few decades, especially in the last dozen years. Waldstreicher graciously acknowledges that his biography of Wheatley Peters is based on the earliest edition of my own, as well as on my editions of her writings. Waldstreicher's view of Wheatley Peters, too, is that she is a skillful rhetorician and commentator claiming her place—subtly, when necessary, more overtly whenever possible—at the center rather than the margins of the literary, political, and social worlds in which she finds herself. She's a savvy businesswoman who exerts as much control over her life as she can, given her race, age, gender, and social status.

Waldstrei

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 菲利斯-惠特利的奥德赛:菲利斯-惠特利的奥德赛:一位诗人的美国奴隶制和独立之旅》,作者:大卫-瓦尔德斯特里舍 文森特-卡雷塔(简历) 《菲利斯-惠特利的奥德赛:一位诗人的美国奴隶制和独立之旅》,作者:大卫-瓦尔德斯特里舍 文森特-卡雷塔(简历诗人穿越美国奴隶制和独立的旅程》 David Waldstreicher Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2023 480 页。菲利斯-惠特利的奥德赛:纽约市立大学历史学特聘教授戴维-瓦尔德施特里歇尔(David Waldstreicher)所著的《菲利斯-惠特利的奥德赛:一位诗人的美国奴隶制与独立之旅》既及时又必要。及时是因为他的传记是在惠特利-彼得斯诞辰 250 周年之际出版的两本传记之一,在这一年,她出版了《关于宗教和道德的各种主题的诗》,并获得了自由;必要是因为科妮莉亚-H-代顿自 2011 年出版第一本诗人长篇传记(代顿,《找回失去的岁月》)以来,发现了关于她晚年生活和婚姻的最重要的传记发现:约翰-彼得斯和菲利斯-惠特利-彼得斯在米德尔顿》,《新英格兰季刊》,第 94 卷,2021 年)。Waldstreicher 的传记也是对惠特利-彼得斯近期在小说、评论、教学和学术方面所受关注的重要贡献,Honorée Fannone Jeffers 以诗歌形式撰写了富有想象力的传记《菲利斯的时代》(Wesleyan UP,2020 年);《早期美国文学》(Early American Literature)专刊(第 57 卷,第 3 期,2022 年)也对惠特利-彼得斯进行了报道。57,第 3 期,2022 年);温迪-拉斐尔-罗伯茨(Wendy Raphael Roberts)的新归属论证(《早期美国文学》,第 58 卷,第 1 期,2023 年);我的《菲利斯-惠特利-彼得斯著作》修订版 [第 154 页末](牛津大学出版社,2024 年);以及我的菲利斯-惠特利-彼得斯修订版:被奴役的天才传记》(佐治亚大学出版社,2023 年)。通过与一家非学术出版社合作出版《菲利斯-惠特利的奥德赛》,沃尔德斯特里舍尔将更广泛地展示惠特利-彼得斯及其时代的肖像,这对于那些关注过去几十年,尤其是最近十几年在学术界发表的关于惠特利-彼得斯的传记、评论和编辑工作的早期美国文学读者来说是再熟悉不过的了。沃尔德施特莱彻慷慨地承认,他的《惠特莉-彼得斯传》是根据我自己的最早版本以及我对她的著作的版本编写的。沃尔德施特赖歇尔对惠特利-彼得斯的看法也是,她是一位娴熟的修辞学家和评论家,在必要时隐晦地、在可能的情况下更公开地在她所处的文学、政治和社会世界的中心而非边缘占据一席之地。她是一个精明的女商人,考虑到自己的种族、年龄、性别和社会地位,她尽可能地控制自己的生活。光是瓦尔德斯特里舍尔的尾注就值回票价。他的尾注字数约为《菲利斯-惠特利的奥德赛》总字数的一半,几乎构成了对他人以及沃尔德施特赖歇尔本人以前研究惠特利-彼得斯的文献综述。事实证明,他对前人的贡献进行了深思熟虑的鉴别。沃尔德施特赖歇尔在对惠特利进行广泛调查的基础上,又对她的生平和著作进行了一些历史背景的补充。他的传记最大的优点可能是对她的经典诗作进行了许多非常有辨识度的解读,这比一般面向普通读者的传记更注重广泛的文学分析,值得欢迎。例如,他对古典文学翻译在惠特利-彼得斯作品中所起作用的论述,是我所见过的最平衡、最精致、最透彻的。瓦尔德施特莱彻并没有参与关于我们应该如何称呼其传记主题的讨论。霍诺雷-法诺内-杰弗斯和扎卡里-麦克劳德-哈钦斯(《早期美国文学》,第 56 卷,第 3 期,第 663-67 页)最近都提出了令人信服的论点,即我们应该用菲利斯-彼得斯或菲利斯-惠特利-彼得斯的婚前姓氏来称呼她。1778 年 11 月,菲利斯-惠特利与约翰-彼得斯结婚时,她选择用约翰-彼得斯获得自由后为自己起的名字取代她被奴役时的姓氏。她决定通过婚姻改名来重新确定自己的身份,这与我对她在遇到约翰之前的生活中所表现出的能动性的总体 [第 155 页完] 表述是一致的。菲利斯与约翰结婚的决定并没有像她的十九世纪传记作者希望我们相信的那样,是一个灾难性的错误......
{"title":"The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley: A Poet's Journeys through American Slavery and Independence by David Waldstreicher (review)","authors":"Vincent Carretta","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a918914","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a918914","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley: A Poet's Journeys through American Slavery and Independence</em> by David Waldstreicher <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Vincent Carretta (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley: A Poet's Journeys through American Slavery and Independence</em><br/> <small>david waldstreicher</small><br/> Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2023<br/> 480 pp. <p><em>The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley: A Poet's Journeys through American Slavery and Independence</em>, by David Waldstreicher, Distinguished Professor of History at CUNY, is both timely and necessary. Timely because his is one of two biographies published during the 250th anniversary of Wheatley Peters's annus mirabilis, the year in which she both published <em>Poems on Various Subjects, Religious and Moral</em> and gained her freedom; necessary because of Cornelia H. Dayton's most significant biographical discoveries about her later life and marriage found since the publication in 2011 of the first full-length biography of the poet (Dayton, \"Lost Years Recovered: John Peters and Phillis Wheatley Peters in Middleton,\" <em>New England Quarterly</em>, vol. 94, 2021). Waldstreicher's biography is also a major contribution to the recent fictional, critical, pedagogical, and scholarly attention Wheatley Peters has received in Honorée Fannone Jeffers's imaginative biography in verse, <em>The Age of Phillis</em> (Wesleyan UP, 2020); a special issue of <em>Early American Literature</em> (vol. 57, no. 3, 2022); a new attribution argument by Wendy Raphael Roberts (<em>Early American Literature</em>, vol. 58, no. 1, 2023); my revised edition of <em>The Writings of Phillis Wheatley Peters</em> <strong>[End Page 154]</strong> (Oxford UP, 2024); and my revised <em>Phillis Wheatley Peters: Biography of a Genius in Bondage</em> (U of Georgia P, 2023).</p> <p>By publishing <em>The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley</em> with a nonacademic press, Waldstreicher will make more widely available a portrait of Wheatley Peters and her times familiar to the readers of <em>Early American Literature</em> who have followed the biographical, critical, and editorial work on her published in more academic venues during the past few decades, especially in the last dozen years. Waldstreicher graciously acknowledges that his biography of Wheatley Peters is based on the earliest edition of my own, as well as on my editions of her writings. Waldstreicher's view of Wheatley Peters, too, is that she is a skillful rhetorician and commentator claiming her place—subtly, when necessary, more overtly whenever possible—at the center rather than the margins of the literary, political, and social worlds in which she finds herself. She's a savvy businesswoman who exerts as much control over her life as she can, given her race, age, gender, and social status.</p> <p>Waldstrei","PeriodicalId":44043,"journal":{"name":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139766586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1