首页 > 最新文献

Colonial Latin American Review最新文献

英文 中文
Foreword: ‘Peering forward’ 前言:“凝视未来”
IF 0.4 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI: 10.1080/10609164.2023.2250241
Dana Leibsohn
Published in Colonial Latin American Review (Vol. 32, No. 3, 2023)
发表于《殖民拉丁美洲评论》(2023年第32卷第3期)
{"title":"Foreword: ‘Peering forward’","authors":"Dana Leibsohn","doi":"10.1080/10609164.2023.2250241","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10609164.2023.2250241","url":null,"abstract":"Published in Colonial Latin American Review (Vol. 32, No. 3, 2023)","PeriodicalId":44336,"journal":{"name":"Colonial Latin American Review","volume":"167 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138507749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interregnos en el cabildo metropolitano de Manila (1641–1653) 在马尼拉大都会议会任职期间(1641 - 1653)
IF 0.4 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI: 10.1080/10609164.2023.2246838
Alexandre Coello de la Rosa
Los cabildos catedralicios de Manila han sido escasamente estudiados a pesar de su papel fundamental en la vida cotidiana, social, política y económica de la capital. La función de estas corporacio...
尽管大教堂在马尼拉的日常社会、政治和经济生活中扮演着重要的角色,但人们对大教堂的研究却很少。这些公司的职能…
{"title":"Interregnos en el cabildo metropolitano de Manila (1641–1653)","authors":"Alexandre Coello de la Rosa","doi":"10.1080/10609164.2023.2246838","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10609164.2023.2246838","url":null,"abstract":"Los cabildos catedralicios de Manila han sido escasamente estudiados a pesar de su papel fundamental en la vida cotidiana, social, política y económica de la capital. La función de estas corporacio...","PeriodicalId":44336,"journal":{"name":"Colonial Latin American Review","volume":"211 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138507745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The fleet system and the troubled shipping institutions in the Portuguese Atlantic (seventeenth and eighteenth centuries) 葡萄牙大西洋的船队体系和麻烦不断的航运机构(17和18世纪)
IF 0.4 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI: 10.1080/10609164.2023.2246835
Felipe Souza Melo
Improvements in shipping productivity, resulting from increased maritime safety, are considered essential factors to explain commercial growth in long-distance trade between the seventeenth and nin...
由于海上安全的提高而导致的航运生产力的提高,被认为是解释17世纪到19世纪之间长途贸易商业增长的重要因素。
{"title":"The fleet system and the troubled shipping institutions in the Portuguese Atlantic (seventeenth and eighteenth centuries)","authors":"Felipe Souza Melo","doi":"10.1080/10609164.2023.2246835","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10609164.2023.2246835","url":null,"abstract":"Improvements in shipping productivity, resulting from increased maritime safety, are considered essential factors to explain commercial growth in long-distance trade between the seventeenth and nin...","PeriodicalId":44336,"journal":{"name":"Colonial Latin American Review","volume":"211 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138507744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
El trigésimo aniversario de la Colonial Latin American Review: algunas reflexiones 殖民时期拉丁美洲评论30周年:一些反思
IF 0.4 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10609164.2023.2205260
Ana María Presta
En la patria del tango, mi país, la Argentina, y mi ciudad, Buenos Aires, es corriente tararear una de las piezas más emblemáticas, que se titula Volver. Ese tango, inmortalizado en la película ‘El día que me quieras’ por Carlos Gardel, expresa la memoria de un viajero nostálgico que al regresar a la patria se consuela diciendo que, ‘veinte años no es nada.’ Por el contrario, y sin nostalgia, para nuestra revista treinta años es mucho, aunque por otras y auspiciosas razones. Desde la edición de su volumen 1, que concentraba los números 1 y 2 en 305 páginas en formato libro, mucha agua ha corrido bajo nuestras academias, hemos incorporado diversos abordajes teórico-metodológicos, renovado las temáticas, incorporado plataformas visuales y sonoras a los enfoques multidisciplinares, en síntesis, los estudios coloniales experimentaron un salto cualitativo en estas tres décadas. De ello es testigo y participante activa la Colonial Latin American Review. Más allá de la poética inicial, mis reflexiones tienen por objeto historizar nuestra CLAR desde sus comienzos, rescatando y situando los contenidos de su mayoría de edad e ingreso a la madurez visualizando escuelas fundacionales, campos conceptuales, resignificaciones categoriales e incorporaciones temáticas, a fin de perseguir la supervivencia y la fortaleza de los estudios coloniales tras sus páginas, para atisbar cómo seguir. En 1992 apareció el primer volumen de la revista. Al presentarse como una propuesta multidisciplinar, renovaba y modernizaba su oferta de contenidos por sobre las revistas latinoamericanistas que, como The Hispanic American Historical Review, fundada en 1916, o The Americas, cuyo primer número apareció en 1944, concentraban plumas, métodos y lectores mayormente formados en la Historia. Nuestra CLAR emergió en un contexto en que las ciencias sociales y humanas se engarzaban en temas y problemas mezclados y con abordajes múltiples e interdigitados, en los que eran notorios los préstamos categoriales y los campos disciplinares compartidos, tal como desde la década de 1960 lo proponían etnógrafos, antropólogos e historiadores, más tímidamente los lingüistas, críticos literarios e historiadores del arte en sus intentos de configurar una heurística que llamo pluridocumental, esto es, un diálogo entre el documento y el testimonio, la crónica y el archivo, la imagen y la fuente escrita, el diccionario y la lengua, para arribar a más acabadas hermenéuticas que permitieran recuperar y hacer más audibles las voces, especialmente las subalternas, que habitaron el pasado colonial.
在探戈的祖国,我的国家阿根廷和我的城市布宜诺斯艾利斯,经常哼唱最具象征意义的作品之一,名为《回来》。卡洛斯·加德尔在电影《你爱我的那一天》中永垂不朽的探戈表达了一位怀旧的旅行者的记忆,当他回到祖国时,他说:“20年什么都不是。”相反,没有怀旧之情,对我们的杂志来说,30年是很长的一段时间,尽管出于其他吉祥的原因。自第一卷出版以来,第一卷和第二卷以305页的书的形式集中在第一卷和第二卷上,我们的学院下有很多水,我们采用了各种理论-方法论方法,更新了主题,将视觉和声音平台纳入了多学科方法,简而言之,殖民地研究在这三十年中经历了质的飞跃。殖民地拉丁美洲评论见证了这一点,并积极参与了这一点。除了最初的诗歌之外,我的反思旨在从一开始就记录我们的CLAR,通过可视化基础学校、概念领域、类别重新定义和主题整合来拯救和定位其成年和成熟的内容,以追求殖民研究在其页面后的生存和力量,以了解如何继续下去。1992年,该杂志的第一卷出版了。通过将其作为一项多学科提案提出,它更新和现代化了其关于拉丁美洲杂志的内容,这些杂志,如1916年成立的《西班牙裔美国历史评论》或1944年首次出版的《美洲》,集中了主要在历史上形成的笔、方法和读者。我们的CLAR是在社会和人文科学陷入混合主题和问题的背景下出现的,采用了多种和交叉的方法,其中类别贷款和共同的学科领域是众所周知的,正如民族学、人类学家和历史学家,更害羞的是语言学家所建议的那样,文学评论家和艺术史学家试图建立一种我称之为多文档的启发式方法,即文件和证词、编年史和档案、书面图像和来源、词典和语言之间的对话,以达到更完整的解释学,使居住在殖民地过去的声音,特别是下层妇女的声音得以恢复和更容易听到。
{"title":"El trigésimo aniversario de la Colonial Latin American Review: algunas reflexiones","authors":"Ana María Presta","doi":"10.1080/10609164.2023.2205260","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10609164.2023.2205260","url":null,"abstract":"En la patria del tango, mi país, la Argentina, y mi ciudad, Buenos Aires, es corriente tararear una de las piezas más emblemáticas, que se titula Volver. Ese tango, inmortalizado en la película ‘El día que me quieras’ por Carlos Gardel, expresa la memoria de un viajero nostálgico que al regresar a la patria se consuela diciendo que, ‘veinte años no es nada.’ Por el contrario, y sin nostalgia, para nuestra revista treinta años es mucho, aunque por otras y auspiciosas razones. Desde la edición de su volumen 1, que concentraba los números 1 y 2 en 305 páginas en formato libro, mucha agua ha corrido bajo nuestras academias, hemos incorporado diversos abordajes teórico-metodológicos, renovado las temáticas, incorporado plataformas visuales y sonoras a los enfoques multidisciplinares, en síntesis, los estudios coloniales experimentaron un salto cualitativo en estas tres décadas. De ello es testigo y participante activa la Colonial Latin American Review. Más allá de la poética inicial, mis reflexiones tienen por objeto historizar nuestra CLAR desde sus comienzos, rescatando y situando los contenidos de su mayoría de edad e ingreso a la madurez visualizando escuelas fundacionales, campos conceptuales, resignificaciones categoriales e incorporaciones temáticas, a fin de perseguir la supervivencia y la fortaleza de los estudios coloniales tras sus páginas, para atisbar cómo seguir. En 1992 apareció el primer volumen de la revista. Al presentarse como una propuesta multidisciplinar, renovaba y modernizaba su oferta de contenidos por sobre las revistas latinoamericanistas que, como The Hispanic American Historical Review, fundada en 1916, o The Americas, cuyo primer número apareció en 1944, concentraban plumas, métodos y lectores mayormente formados en la Historia. Nuestra CLAR emergió en un contexto en que las ciencias sociales y humanas se engarzaban en temas y problemas mezclados y con abordajes múltiples e interdigitados, en los que eran notorios los préstamos categoriales y los campos disciplinares compartidos, tal como desde la década de 1960 lo proponían etnógrafos, antropólogos e historiadores, más tímidamente los lingüistas, críticos literarios e historiadores del arte en sus intentos de configurar una heurística que llamo pluridocumental, esto es, un diálogo entre el documento y el testimonio, la crónica y el archivo, la imagen y la fuente escrita, el diccionario y la lengua, para arribar a más acabadas hermenéuticas que permitieran recuperar y hacer más audibles las voces, especialmente las subalternas, que habitaron el pasado colonial.","PeriodicalId":44336,"journal":{"name":"Colonial Latin American Review","volume":"32 1","pages":"277 - 288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44110919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Expanding the colonial archive 扩大殖民地档案
IF 0.4 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10609164.2023.2205256
Miguel A. Valerio
ABSTRACT Reflecting on the insights the churches Black brotherhoods built in colonial Brazil have to offer about the patrons' lives and subjectivities, this brief provocation invites to think the colonial archive beyond the static document.
反思巴西殖民时期黑人兄弟会教堂所提供的关于赞助人的生活和主体性的见解,这一简短的挑衅引发了对殖民地档案的思考,超越了静态文件。
{"title":"Expanding the colonial archive","authors":"Miguel A. Valerio","doi":"10.1080/10609164.2023.2205256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10609164.2023.2205256","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Reflecting on the insights the churches Black brotherhoods built in colonial Brazil have to offer about the patrons' lives and subjectivities, this brief provocation invites to think the colonial archive beyond the static document.","PeriodicalId":44336,"journal":{"name":"Colonial Latin American Review","volume":"32 1","pages":"257 - 270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41725590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sovereign joy: Afro-Mexican kings and queens, 1539–1640 君主的喜悦:非裔墨西哥国王和王后,1539–1640
IF 0.4 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10609164.2023.2205267
Pablo Miguel Sierra Silva
{"title":"Sovereign joy: Afro-Mexican kings and queens, 1539–1640","authors":"Pablo Miguel Sierra Silva","doi":"10.1080/10609164.2023.2205267","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10609164.2023.2205267","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44336,"journal":{"name":"Colonial Latin American Review","volume":"32 1","pages":"294 - 295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41622944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Argentina y conquista del Río de la Plata de Martín del Barco Centenera 阿根廷和征服马丁·德尔·巴尔科·森特内拉的拉普拉塔河
IF 0.4 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10609164.2023.2205269
Loreley El Jaber
la recepción del lector), en los preliminares los autores buscaban incidir en la lectura de una obra, ya sea frente las autoridades civiles y religiosas, los miembros de la cultura letrada o el público en general; y propone reflexiones que invitan a repensar supuestos sobre el circuito de producción, censura, impresión y circulación de una obra, pues su circularidad, como propone la autora, implica que las autoridades, los censores, los autores y los apologistas, eran juez y parte de las estructuras de poder, y productores y receptores de los textos, por lo que en lugar de censura o crítica, es ejercicio de recíproca legitimación. Finalmente, el libro propone una metodología y categorías de análisis, y nuevas rutas de investigación: ¿es posible deducir una poética literaria de los preliminares?, ¿existe relación entre las preceptivas de los paratextos y un tipo textual?, ¿qué papel tuvo el discurso público femenino de los poemas laudatorios?, por lo que es un referente obligado para futuras investigaciones.
在序言中,作者试图在民事和宗教当局、法律文化成员或公众面前影响作品的阅读;它提出了一些反思,邀请人们重新思考对作品的生产、审查、印刷和流通回路的假设,因为正如作者所建议的那样,作品的流通意味着当局、审查员、作者和辩护人是法官和权力结构的一部分,是文本的生产者和接受者,因此,它不是审查或批评,而是相互合法化的行使。最后,该书提出了一种分析方法和类别,以及新的研究路线:是否有可能从序言中推断出文学诗学?,paratexts的要求与文本类型之间是否存在关系?,女性公共话语在赞美诗中扮演了什么角色?,因此,它是未来研究的强制性参考。
{"title":"Argentina y conquista del Río de la Plata de Martín del Barco Centenera","authors":"Loreley El Jaber","doi":"10.1080/10609164.2023.2205269","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10609164.2023.2205269","url":null,"abstract":"la recepción del lector), en los preliminares los autores buscaban incidir en la lectura de una obra, ya sea frente las autoridades civiles y religiosas, los miembros de la cultura letrada o el público en general; y propone reflexiones que invitan a repensar supuestos sobre el circuito de producción, censura, impresión y circulación de una obra, pues su circularidad, como propone la autora, implica que las autoridades, los censores, los autores y los apologistas, eran juez y parte de las estructuras de poder, y productores y receptores de los textos, por lo que en lugar de censura o crítica, es ejercicio de recíproca legitimación. Finalmente, el libro propone una metodología y categorías de análisis, y nuevas rutas de investigación: ¿es posible deducir una poética literaria de los preliminares?, ¿existe relación entre las preceptivas de los paratextos y un tipo textual?, ¿qué papel tuvo el discurso público femenino de los poemas laudatorios?, por lo que es un referente obligado para futuras investigaciones.","PeriodicalId":44336,"journal":{"name":"Colonial Latin American Review","volume":"32 1","pages":"297 - 298"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46844230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Leer el libro desde sus paratextos: censura, crítica y legitimación en la literatura novohispana (siglos XVI–XVIII) 阅读这本书的旁文本:新西班牙文学中的审查、批评和合法化(16 - 18世纪)
IF 0.4 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10609164.2023.2205268
María Isabel Terán Elizondo
instance, in his interpretation of Nicolás de Torres’s Festín hecho por las morenas criollas (1640), the central text for Chapter 4. After extensive analysis of the allegorical dances performed by Black women for the incoming viceroy, Valerio claims that these festive performances speak to Afro-Mexican cultural and sociopolitical agency, to the degree that even the publication of the text may be attributed to the creole women of Mexico City. Here the author turns to examples from eighteenth-century Minas Gerais to support his argument by referencing later cases in which other Black communities sponsored the publication of festive texts. While some may take exception to such a chronological and temporal leap, this reader found the engagement with confraternal Brazilian sources productive. Casting such a wide diasporic net for images and textual references of Black kings and queens, ambassadors, dancers, drummers, and cofrades advances a rich, multidisciplinary, trans-imperial dialogue. For instance, in Chapter 3, Valerio deconstructs the representation of a float with an African monarch atop a firework-filled elephant as part of Ignatius of Loyola’s beatification celebrations in Mexico City. This extravagant scene was a central component of the anonymous text known as ‘Relación de las fiestas insignes’ (1610), which also featured an elaborate castle manned (and perhaps designed?) by the Black brotherhood of the Dominican convent. Valerio offers a superb translation of the festive text, before presenting a visual compendium of Black kings riding elephants from a variety of early modern sources. The effect of juxtaposing these textual and visual materials allows for a variety of readings and questions. How, for instance, would a Black creole, born and raised in Mexico, engage with archetypal, yet celebratory, representations of African monarchs? Sovereign joy also advances a powerful, if understated, question: if some of the earliest records of Black festive culture in the African diaspora are found in Mexico, why have these practices received so little scholarly attention? In this reader’s opinion, this query and challenge are posed to Mexicanists and scholars of Black studies alike. Valerio has documented the hypervisibility of Black kings and, to a lesser extent, queens, since the 1530s. The book, then, serves as an invitation to reconsider ‘the early genealogy’ of Black sovereigns in the Americas with Mexico as the point of departure (220). In sum, Sovereign joy is a welcome and timely monograph. It will appeal to scholars of the African diaspora, Black religious practices, and artistic representations of the Black body. Given its multidisciplinary approach, it should be adopted broadly in History, Black Studies, Religion, Art History, and Comparative Literature coursework.
例如,在他对Nicolás de Torres的Festín hecho por las morenas criollas(1640)的解读中,这是第四章的中心文本。在对黑人女性为即将上任的总督表演的寓言舞蹈进行了广泛分析后,Valerio声称,这些节日表演与非裔墨西哥文化和社会政治机构有关,甚至文本的出版也可能归因于墨西哥城的克里奥尔女性。在这里,作者引用了18世纪米纳斯吉拉斯的例子来支持他的论点,并引用了后来其他黑人社区赞助出版节日文本的案例。虽然有些人可能会对这种时间和时间上的飞跃表示异议,但这位读者发现,与巴西同行的接触富有成效。在如此广泛的流散网络中寻找黑人国王和王后、大使、舞者、鼓手和同事的图像和文本参考,推动了一场丰富的、多学科的、跨帝国的对话。例如,在第三章中,Valerio解构了一个漂浮物的形象,一位非洲君主顶在一头充满烟火的大象上,这是Ignatius of Loyola在墨西哥城宣福礼的一部分。这一奢华的场景是被称为“Relación de las fiestas insignes”(1610)的匿名文本的核心组成部分,该文本还展示了一座由多明尼加修道院的黑人兄弟会管理(也许是设计的?)的精致城堡。Valerio对节日文本进行了出色的翻译,然后展示了来自各种早期现代来源的黑人国王骑大象的视觉简编。将这些文本和视觉材料并置的效果允许进行各种阅读和提问。例如,一个在墨西哥出生和长大的黑人克里奥尔人将如何与非洲君主的原型但又是庆祝性的代表接触?主权的喜悦也提出了一个强有力的问题,尽管被低估了:如果非洲侨民中一些最早的黑人节日文化记录是在墨西哥发现的,为什么这些做法很少受到学术关注?在这位读者看来,这种质疑和挑战是对墨西哥人和黑人研究学者提出的。瓦莱里奥记录了自15世纪30年代以来黑人国王和王后的高度可见性。因此,这本书邀请人们重新考虑以墨西哥为出发点的美洲黑人君主的“早期谱系”(220)。总之,《君主的喜悦》是一本受欢迎且及时的专著。它将吸引非洲侨民、黑人宗教实践和黑人身体艺术表现的学者。鉴于其多学科的方法,它应该在历史、黑人研究、宗教、艺术史和比较文学课程中广泛采用。
{"title":"Leer el libro desde sus paratextos: censura, crítica y legitimación en la literatura novohispana (siglos XVI–XVIII)","authors":"María Isabel Terán Elizondo","doi":"10.1080/10609164.2023.2205268","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10609164.2023.2205268","url":null,"abstract":"instance, in his interpretation of Nicolás de Torres’s Festín hecho por las morenas criollas (1640), the central text for Chapter 4. After extensive analysis of the allegorical dances performed by Black women for the incoming viceroy, Valerio claims that these festive performances speak to Afro-Mexican cultural and sociopolitical agency, to the degree that even the publication of the text may be attributed to the creole women of Mexico City. Here the author turns to examples from eighteenth-century Minas Gerais to support his argument by referencing later cases in which other Black communities sponsored the publication of festive texts. While some may take exception to such a chronological and temporal leap, this reader found the engagement with confraternal Brazilian sources productive. Casting such a wide diasporic net for images and textual references of Black kings and queens, ambassadors, dancers, drummers, and cofrades advances a rich, multidisciplinary, trans-imperial dialogue. For instance, in Chapter 3, Valerio deconstructs the representation of a float with an African monarch atop a firework-filled elephant as part of Ignatius of Loyola’s beatification celebrations in Mexico City. This extravagant scene was a central component of the anonymous text known as ‘Relación de las fiestas insignes’ (1610), which also featured an elaborate castle manned (and perhaps designed?) by the Black brotherhood of the Dominican convent. Valerio offers a superb translation of the festive text, before presenting a visual compendium of Black kings riding elephants from a variety of early modern sources. The effect of juxtaposing these textual and visual materials allows for a variety of readings and questions. How, for instance, would a Black creole, born and raised in Mexico, engage with archetypal, yet celebratory, representations of African monarchs? Sovereign joy also advances a powerful, if understated, question: if some of the earliest records of Black festive culture in the African diaspora are found in Mexico, why have these practices received so little scholarly attention? In this reader’s opinion, this query and challenge are posed to Mexicanists and scholars of Black studies alike. Valerio has documented the hypervisibility of Black kings and, to a lesser extent, queens, since the 1530s. The book, then, serves as an invitation to reconsider ‘the early genealogy’ of Black sovereigns in the Americas with Mexico as the point of departure (220). In sum, Sovereign joy is a welcome and timely monograph. It will appeal to scholars of the African diaspora, Black religious practices, and artistic representations of the Black body. Given its multidisciplinary approach, it should be adopted broadly in History, Black Studies, Religion, Art History, and Comparative Literature coursework.","PeriodicalId":44336,"journal":{"name":"Colonial Latin American Review","volume":"32 1","pages":"295 - 297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41848267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unfixing timelines: connecting colonial pasts and contemporary constructs 不固定的时间线:连接殖民历史和当代结构
IF 0.4 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10609164.2023.2205232
K. Myers
By connecting the colonial past and its presence today, we can gain deeper insight into both the colonial and contemporary periods—not just in Latin America and Europe but across the global north, Africa, Asia, and the Pacific world. This step away from the traditional geographical and temporal limits of our field takes as its point of departure the notion that colonialist scholars can offer a unique vantage point on modern and contemporary phenomena that so frequently reference Spanish colonialism. Soon after the signing of NAFTA in Mexico, for example, the newly formed Zapatista movement (EZLN) declared war on a 500-year-old legacy of conquest and colonialism, which the authoritarian Partido Institutional Revolucionario had fomented during its 70-year rule. More recently transnational artist Alfonso Cuarón stated that his film ‘Roma’ showcases not just class conflict but also social unrest that emerged from colonial and neo-colonial racial structures. Both of these examples not only cite colonial legacies as thematic remembrances of the past, they connect colonialism, modernity, and coloniality to ongoing—if still ever-changing—structures of race and power. As a scholar and teacher of Colonial Latin America, I have begun to explore ways to understand better these references to colonialism and the colonial past and their role in contemporary society. Recently, I invited four co-authors to investigate ways we might reorient our gaze to see more clearly this relationship. Rather than identify a set of entities under colonial erasure, we sought to track the operations of coloniality itself across a wide range of cultural and material production, across centuries, and across boundaries. Taking the intimate relationship between coloniality and modernity as a point of departure, our volume, Contemporary colonialities in Mexico and beyond, addresses three central questions: How does Mexican colonial history influence the definition of Mexico both from within and outside its borders? What issues rooted in coloniality recur over time and space? And finally, what cultural products can we study to illustrate, in a concrete and tangible way, the relationship between the evolution of colonialism and coloniality through history? We argue that understanding the foundational structures of Spanish colonialism provides insight into the evolution and perpetuation of practices and discourses of racial, ethnic, gender, and social exclusion rooted in Mexico’s history up to the present day. In my chapter for that volume, ‘An archaeology of coloniality,’ I argue that a spatial perspective can provide a useful lens to access the relationship between colonialism,
通过将殖民地的过去及其今天的存在联系起来,我们可以更深入地了解殖民时期和当代——不仅在拉丁美洲和欧洲,而且在全球北部、非洲、亚洲和太平洋世界。这一步远离了我们领域传统的地理和时间限制,其出发点是殖民主义学者可以为经常提及西班牙殖民主义的现代和当代现象提供独特的视角。例如,在墨西哥签署《北美自由贸易协定》后不久,新成立的萨帕塔主义运动(EZLN)就向独裁的制度革命党在其70年统治期间煽动的长达500年的征服和殖民主义遗产宣战。最近,跨国艺术家阿方索·库隆(Alfonso Cuarón)表示,他的电影《罗姆人》不仅展示了阶级冲突,还展示了殖民主义和新殖民主义种族结构引发的社会动荡。这两个例子不仅将殖民遗产作为对过去的主题回忆,还将殖民主义、现代性和殖民主义与正在进行的——如果仍然不断变化的话——种族和权力结构联系起来。作为一名研究殖民地拉丁美洲的学者和教师,我已经开始探索如何更好地理解这些对殖民主义和殖民历史的提及,以及它们在当代社会中的作用。最近,我邀请了四位合著者来研究我们如何重新调整视线,以更清楚地看到这种关系。我们没有确定一组被殖民抹杀的实体,而是试图追踪殖民主义本身在广泛的文化和物质生产中、跨越几个世纪和跨越边界的运作。以殖民主义和现代性之间的密切关系为出发点,我们的著作《墨西哥内外的当代殖民主义》解决了三个核心问题:墨西哥殖民历史如何从其境内外影响墨西哥的定义?哪些植根于殖民主义的问题会随着时间和空间的推移而反复出现?最后,我们可以研究哪些文化产品,以具体和有形的方式说明殖民主义和殖民主义在历史上的演变之间的关系?我们认为,了解西班牙殖民主义的基本结构,可以深入了解墨西哥历史上至今根深蒂固的种族、族裔、性别和社会排斥的实践和话语的演变和延续。在我为那本书撰写的“殖民考古”一章中,我认为空间视角可以提供一个有用的视角来了解殖民主义之间的关系,
{"title":"Unfixing timelines: connecting colonial pasts and contemporary constructs","authors":"K. Myers","doi":"10.1080/10609164.2023.2205232","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10609164.2023.2205232","url":null,"abstract":"By connecting the colonial past and its presence today, we can gain deeper insight into both the colonial and contemporary periods—not just in Latin America and Europe but across the global north, Africa, Asia, and the Pacific world. This step away from the traditional geographical and temporal limits of our field takes as its point of departure the notion that colonialist scholars can offer a unique vantage point on modern and contemporary phenomena that so frequently reference Spanish colonialism. Soon after the signing of NAFTA in Mexico, for example, the newly formed Zapatista movement (EZLN) declared war on a 500-year-old legacy of conquest and colonialism, which the authoritarian Partido Institutional Revolucionario had fomented during its 70-year rule. More recently transnational artist Alfonso Cuarón stated that his film ‘Roma’ showcases not just class conflict but also social unrest that emerged from colonial and neo-colonial racial structures. Both of these examples not only cite colonial legacies as thematic remembrances of the past, they connect colonialism, modernity, and coloniality to ongoing—if still ever-changing—structures of race and power. As a scholar and teacher of Colonial Latin America, I have begun to explore ways to understand better these references to colonialism and the colonial past and their role in contemporary society. Recently, I invited four co-authors to investigate ways we might reorient our gaze to see more clearly this relationship. Rather than identify a set of entities under colonial erasure, we sought to track the operations of coloniality itself across a wide range of cultural and material production, across centuries, and across boundaries. Taking the intimate relationship between coloniality and modernity as a point of departure, our volume, Contemporary colonialities in Mexico and beyond, addresses three central questions: How does Mexican colonial history influence the definition of Mexico both from within and outside its borders? What issues rooted in coloniality recur over time and space? And finally, what cultural products can we study to illustrate, in a concrete and tangible way, the relationship between the evolution of colonialism and coloniality through history? We argue that understanding the foundational structures of Spanish colonialism provides insight into the evolution and perpetuation of practices and discourses of racial, ethnic, gender, and social exclusion rooted in Mexico’s history up to the present day. In my chapter for that volume, ‘An archaeology of coloniality,’ I argue that a spatial perspective can provide a useful lens to access the relationship between colonialism,","PeriodicalId":44336,"journal":{"name":"Colonial Latin American Review","volume":"32 1","pages":"228 - 234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42592358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Foreword 前言
IF 0.4 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10609164.2023.2205215
Dana Leibsohn
Geographies of martyrdom and Enlightenment imagery, religious authorities who rail against local customs, and shifting histories of urban devotion—all are addressed by articles in this issue of CLAR. Also published here are meditations on the future of colonial Latin American Studies. The essays traverse an expansive swathe of territory, from Brazil and Baja to cities in the Philippines and Europe. The disciplinary lenses—history, literary studies, anthropology and art history—will be familiar, yet collectively the writing in this issue poses two broad and knotty questions. The first of these queries: what aspects of the past deserve our attention? Often scholars answer by enlisting the phrases ‘little-studied,’ ‘overlooked,’ or ‘misunderstood.’ These are prudent responses, although I do not find them particularly sustaining. For they imply that the primary work of scholarship is to fill lacunae in or correct alreadycharted maps of knowledge. Even if such cartographies exist, it is not at all clear that we should trust them as guides. The second, related question concerns the binding relationships of current work to that of previous generations: how do scholars decide what, if anything, they owe those who came before? In a recent essay on inheritance, anthropologist Tim Ingold calls for rethinking both term and concept (Ingold 2023). For him, inheritance fails to adequately explain the creative and long-term cultural practices that passing along requires (be it a family farm or academic knowledge). He further argues that inheritance elevates ancestral relations, minimizing transmissions that occur within a single generation. In sidelining inheritance, Ingold instead prioritizes perdurance and learning—both of which incorporate environmental, not strictly human-centric change over time. As he notes, ‘knowledge [...] does not “descend” from generation to generation but is regrown in each through their practical overlap as generations carry on their lives together. What every generation brings to the next are the conditions of development for this regrowth to occur’ (Ingold 2023, S41). While Ingold’s interests occupy the intersection of anthropology and biology, his thinking implicates those who write histories of colonial life and experience. Our work would be impossible without multiple kinds of passing down. ‘The colonial,’ however we wish to define or describe it, is far more than a finite period on a timeline that has come and gone, leaving traces in archives and museum collections. Those of us living in the 2020s see, feel, and experience its enduring dynamics every day. Moreover, people who study and write about colonial histories leverage—indeed depend upon—texts, archives and collections that have crossed a long durée. Also enchaining our academic practices across generations are habits of building and demonstrating expertise, of marking authority and tutoring new scholars. Ways of naming can come into play, as titles, disciplinary rubrics
殉难的地理位置和启蒙运动的图像,谴责当地习俗的宗教当局,以及不断变化的城市奉献历史——所有这些都在本期《克拉克》的文章中得到了阐述。这里还出版了对殖民地拉丁美洲研究未来的思考。这些文章涵盖了从巴西和巴哈到菲律宾和欧洲城市的广阔领土。学科视角——历史、文学研究、人类学和艺术史——将是熟悉的,但这一问题的写作提出了两个广泛而棘手的问题。第一个问题是:过去的哪些方面值得我们关注?学者们通常会用“很少研究”、“被忽视”或“被误解”来回答这些都是谨慎的回应,尽管我认为它们并不特别持久。因为它们意味着学术的主要工作是填补或纠正已经绘制好的知识图谱中的空白。即使存在这样的制图,我们也不清楚是否应该信任它们作为指南。第二个相关的问题涉及当前工作与前几代工作的约束关系:学者们如何决定他们欠前几代人什么(如果有的话)?在最近一篇关于继承的文章中,人类学家Tim Ingold呼吁重新思考术语和概念(Ingold 2023)。对他来说,遗产无法充分解释传承所需的创造性和长期文化实践(无论是家庭农场还是学术知识)。他进一步认为,继承可以提升祖先关系,最大限度地减少单代人内的传播。在搁置继承的过程中,英格尔反而优先考虑持久性和学习——这两者都包含了环境变化,而不是严格意义上的以人为中心的变化。正如他所指出的,“知识[…]并不是一代又一代地“下降”,而是在几代人共同生活的过程中,通过实际的重叠而在每一代人身上再生。每一代人给下一代人带来的是这种再生的发展条件”(Ingold 2023,S41)。英格尔的兴趣涉及人类学和生物学的交叉点,他的思想涉及那些写殖民地生活和经历史的人。如果没有多种传承,我们的工作是不可能的。”无论我们如何定义或描述殖民地,它远不止是一个来来去去的时间线上的有限时期,在档案和博物馆藏品中留下了痕迹。我们这些生活在20世纪20年代的人每天都能看到、感受和体验它持久的活力。此外,研究和撰写殖民历史的人利用——实际上是依赖——跨越漫长历史的文本、档案和藏品。我们几代人的学术实践还包括培养和展示专业知识、树立权威和辅导新学者的习惯。命名方式可以发挥作用,因为标题、学科准则甚至建筑都暗示着机构记忆。以及在学术出版中传递功能,相当于事务性的,比如当新编辑继承前任建立的材料队列时。殖民主义的某些方面是无法摆脱的,但学术传承取决于共享、可竞争、可协商的价值观。我们如何判断这些价值观。。。这是一个棘手的挑战。
{"title":"Foreword","authors":"Dana Leibsohn","doi":"10.1080/10609164.2023.2205215","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10609164.2023.2205215","url":null,"abstract":"Geographies of martyrdom and Enlightenment imagery, religious authorities who rail against local customs, and shifting histories of urban devotion—all are addressed by articles in this issue of CLAR. Also published here are meditations on the future of colonial Latin American Studies. The essays traverse an expansive swathe of territory, from Brazil and Baja to cities in the Philippines and Europe. The disciplinary lenses—history, literary studies, anthropology and art history—will be familiar, yet collectively the writing in this issue poses two broad and knotty questions. The first of these queries: what aspects of the past deserve our attention? Often scholars answer by enlisting the phrases ‘little-studied,’ ‘overlooked,’ or ‘misunderstood.’ These are prudent responses, although I do not find them particularly sustaining. For they imply that the primary work of scholarship is to fill lacunae in or correct alreadycharted maps of knowledge. Even if such cartographies exist, it is not at all clear that we should trust them as guides. The second, related question concerns the binding relationships of current work to that of previous generations: how do scholars decide what, if anything, they owe those who came before? In a recent essay on inheritance, anthropologist Tim Ingold calls for rethinking both term and concept (Ingold 2023). For him, inheritance fails to adequately explain the creative and long-term cultural practices that passing along requires (be it a family farm or academic knowledge). He further argues that inheritance elevates ancestral relations, minimizing transmissions that occur within a single generation. In sidelining inheritance, Ingold instead prioritizes perdurance and learning—both of which incorporate environmental, not strictly human-centric change over time. As he notes, ‘knowledge [...] does not “descend” from generation to generation but is regrown in each through their practical overlap as generations carry on their lives together. What every generation brings to the next are the conditions of development for this regrowth to occur’ (Ingold 2023, S41). While Ingold’s interests occupy the intersection of anthropology and biology, his thinking implicates those who write histories of colonial life and experience. Our work would be impossible without multiple kinds of passing down. ‘The colonial,’ however we wish to define or describe it, is far more than a finite period on a timeline that has come and gone, leaving traces in archives and museum collections. Those of us living in the 2020s see, feel, and experience its enduring dynamics every day. Moreover, people who study and write about colonial histories leverage—indeed depend upon—texts, archives and collections that have crossed a long durée. Also enchaining our academic practices across generations are habits of building and demonstrating expertise, of marking authority and tutoring new scholars. Ways of naming can come into play, as titles, disciplinary rubrics ","PeriodicalId":44336,"journal":{"name":"Colonial Latin American Review","volume":"32 1","pages":"103 - 107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48933718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Colonial Latin American Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1