Teaching legal research to the first generation raised on the Internet requires a new model. The author argues that educational psychology and pragmatism demand that such a model capitalize on incoming law students' familiarity with the Internet. The author also briefly outlines a curriculum based on this Internet model.
{"title":"Teaching Legal Research from the Inside Out","authors":"Tom Keefe","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1346011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1346011","url":null,"abstract":"Teaching legal research to the first generation raised on the Internet requires a new model. The author argues that educational psychology and pragmatism demand that such a model capitalize on incoming law students' familiarity with the Internet. The author also briefly outlines a curriculum based on this Internet model.","PeriodicalId":44477,"journal":{"name":"Law Library Journal","volume":"97 1","pages":"117-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2009-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68167647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Professor Anzalone introduces servant leadership, an approach to leadership whose principles have been successfully employed in the management of both profit and nonprofit organizations. She suggests that servant leadership, conceptualized almost forty years ago and now enjoying a renaissance of interest, may be the ideal approach for today's law libraries.
{"title":"Servant Leadership: A New Model for Law Library Leaders","authors":"F. Anzalone","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1076895","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1076895","url":null,"abstract":"Professor Anzalone introduces servant leadership, an approach to leadership whose principles have been successfully employed in the management of both profit and nonprofit organizations. She suggests that servant leadership, conceptualized almost forty years ago and now enjoying a renaissance of interest, may be the ideal approach for today's law libraries.","PeriodicalId":44477,"journal":{"name":"Law Library Journal","volume":"99 1","pages":"793-812"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2007-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68133190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Public law librarians — academic law librarians at public universities and court and other government librarians — may enjoy public official immunities protecting them from lawsuits, but Mr. Cannan explains why librarian immunity is still of some concern. He analyzes several types of public official immunities available to law librarians.
{"title":"Are Public Law Librarians Immune from Suit? Muddying the Already Murky Waters of Law Librarian Liability","authors":"J. Cannan","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2773840","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2773840","url":null,"abstract":"Public law librarians — academic law librarians at public universities and court and other government librarians — may enjoy public official immunities protecting them from lawsuits, but Mr. Cannan explains why librarian immunity is still of some concern. He analyzes several types of public official immunities available to law librarians.","PeriodicalId":44477,"journal":{"name":"Law Library Journal","volume":"99 1","pages":"7-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2007-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68310414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In the past 10 years more than 30 English-Spanish legal dictionaries have been published. In reaction to the wide variations with respect to the quality of these dictionaries, this article attempts to articulate the beginnings of a rubric for the evaluation English-Spanish legal dictionaries, borrowing from Bryan Garner's work with of legal dictionaries, then turning to the literature evaluating bilingual dictionaries. The article concludes with an annotated bibliography of major titles in this narrow, but increasingly significant, field.
{"title":"En La Tierra Del Ciego, El Tuerco Es Rey : Problems With Current English-Spanish Legal Dictionaries, and Notes Toward a Critical Comparative Legal Lexicography","authors":"Dennis Kim-Prieto","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.978943","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.978943","url":null,"abstract":"In the past 10 years more than 30 English-Spanish legal dictionaries have been published. In reaction to the wide variations with respect to the quality of these dictionaries, this article attempts to articulate the beginnings of a rubric for the evaluation English-Spanish legal dictionaries, borrowing from Bryan Garner's work with of legal dictionaries, then turning to the literature evaluating bilingual dictionaries. The article concludes with an annotated bibliography of major titles in this narrow, but increasingly significant, field.","PeriodicalId":44477,"journal":{"name":"Law Library Journal","volume":"100 1","pages":"251-278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2007-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67920947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ms. Mart examines the legal evolution of the right to receive information, particularly focusing on its application to libraries, beginning with the Supreme Court holding in Board of Education v. Pico, and followed by cases that have considered the meaning of Pico in a variety of library-related contexts.
{"title":"The Right to Receive Information","authors":"Susan Nevelow Mart","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/za4md","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/za4md","url":null,"abstract":"Ms. Mart examines the legal evolution of the right to receive information, particularly focusing on its application to libraries, beginning with the Supreme Court holding in Board of Education v. Pico, and followed by cases that have considered the meaning of Pico in a variety of library-related contexts.","PeriodicalId":44477,"journal":{"name":"Law Library Journal","volume":"95 1","pages":"175-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69641191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：