Transnational Corporations Review最新文献

英文中文

Strengthening ASEAN's electrical and electronics sector: Enhancing regional production networks and economic resilience 加强东盟电气和电子行业：加强区域生产网络和经济弹性

IF 1.8 Q3 BUSINESS

Transnational Corporations Review

Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200158

Elisa Jean Jion Nor Pau, Chen Chen Yong

This study explores the evolution of Electrical and Electronic (E&E) industry within ASEAN between 2019 and 2023, emphasising its domestic interdependencies and regional production structures. Using input-output model of average propagation length (APL), the analysis categorises ASEAN economies into three production network clusters, namely, peripheral, intermediate, and advanced. The peripheral group, comprising Cambodia and Laos, is characterised by limited industrial capacity and short supply chains, reflecting constraints in skilled labour, capital availability, and infrastructure that hinder deeper industrial integration. The intermediate group, represented by Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam, displays longer APLs that indicate expanding but incomplete supply chain integration. These economies demonstrate concentration in upstream assembly activities yet remain weak in downstream distribution and innovation functions. The advanced group, led by Malaysia and Singapore, exhibits high network embeddedness, robust backward and forward linkages, and greater infrastructural and institutional support, functioning as coordination and innovation hubs within the regional E&E production system. The findings underscore the significance of regional collaboration, logistics optimisation, and technological upgrading to strengthen intra-ASEAN linkages. Policy implications include enhancing local supplier capabilities in peripheral economies, promoting industrial diversification in intermediate economies, and consolidating innovation ecosystems in advanced economies. Overall, this study highlights the hierarchical yet interconnected nature of ASEAN's E&E production network and its pivotal role in achieving a resilient and sustainable regional industrial base.

本研究探讨了2019年至2023年东盟电子电气行业的演变，强调了其国内相互依存关系和区域生产结构。利用平均传播长度（APL）的投入产出模型，分析将东盟经济体划分为三个生产网络集群，即外围、中间和先进。由柬埔寨和老挝组成的外围集团的特点是工业产能有限，供应链短，反映出在熟练劳动力、资本可用性和基础设施方面的限制，阻碍了更深层次的产业整合。中间组，以印度尼西亚、泰国和越南为代表，显示较长的api，表明正在扩大但不完整的供应链整合。这些经济体集中于上游的组装活动，但在下游的分销和创新功能方面仍然薄弱。以马来西亚和新加坡为首的先进集团表现出高度的网络嵌入性，强大的向后和向前联系，以及更大的基础设施和制度支持，在区域电子产品生产系统中发挥协调和创新中心的作用。研究结果强调了区域合作、物流优化和技术升级对加强东盟内部联系的重要性。政策影响包括提高外围经济体的本地供应商能力，促进中间经济体的产业多样化，以及巩固发达经济体的创新生态系统。总体而言，本研究突出了东盟电子产品生产网络的层次性和互联性，以及它在实现有弹性和可持续的区域工业基础方面的关键作用。

{"title":"Strengthening ASEAN's electrical and electronics sector: Enhancing regional production networks and economic resilience","authors":"Elisa Jean Jion Nor Pau, Chen Chen Yong","doi":"10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200158","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200158","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the evolution of Electrical and Electronic (E&E) industry within ASEAN between 2019 and 2023, emphasising its domestic interdependencies and regional production structures. Using input-output model of average propagation length (APL), the analysis categorises ASEAN economies into three production network clusters, namely, peripheral, intermediate, and advanced. The peripheral group, comprising Cambodia and Laos, is characterised by limited industrial capacity and short supply chains, reflecting constraints in skilled labour, capital availability, and infrastructure that hinder deeper industrial integration. The intermediate group, represented by Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam, displays longer APLs that indicate expanding but incomplete supply chain integration. These economies demonstrate concentration in upstream assembly activities yet remain weak in downstream distribution and innovation functions. The advanced group, led by Malaysia and Singapore, exhibits high network embeddedness, robust backward and forward linkages, and greater infrastructural and institutional support, functioning as coordination and innovation hubs within the regional E&E production system. The findings underscore the significance of regional collaboration, logistics optimisation, and technological upgrading to strengthen intra-ASEAN linkages. Policy implications include enhancing local supplier capabilities in peripheral economies, promoting industrial diversification in intermediate economies, and consolidating innovation ecosystems in advanced economies. Overall, this study highlights the hierarchical yet interconnected nature of ASEAN's E&E production network and its pivotal role in achieving a resilient and sustainable regional industrial base.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45011,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Corporations Review","volume":"17 4","pages":"Article 200158"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145839169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

RCEP and sectoral development in ASEAN less developed countries RCEP与东盟欠发达国家部门发展

IF 1.8 Q3 BUSINESS

Transnational Corporations Review

Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200159

Moudatsou Argiro , Spinthiropoulos Konstantinos

The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) is expected to reshape trade, investment, and sectoral dynamics across Asia, yet its implications for less-developed ASEAN members remain underexplored. Existing studies often rely on econometric modeling, but the recent entry into force of RCEP in 2022 limits their ability to capture emerging structural trajectories. This paper provides an early structural mapping of five economies—Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and Vietnam—selected as ASEAN's less-developed members. Although only Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar are formally classified by the United Nations as Least Developed Countries (LDCs), Brunei and Vietnam are included due to structural vulnerabilities that constrain diversification and resilience. Using 2009–2023 data, the paper traces long-term dynamics through a comparative exploratory approach. The findings reveal pronounced divergence: Vietnam and Brunei exhibit industrial and services-led growth supported by high-tech and ICT-oriented FDI and export diversification, while Cambodia and Laos remain largely agriculture-based with limited diversification; Myanmar shows moderate but uneven diversification. Early incorporation into RCEP offers these countries potential benefits through expanded market access, regional integration, and investment inflows. For Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar, targeted policies in infrastructure, workforce development, and export diversification will be critical to fully leverage these opportunities.

区域全面经济伙伴关系协定（RCEP）有望重塑整个亚洲的贸易、投资和行业动态，但其对欠发达东盟成员国的影响仍未得到充分探讨。现有的研究通常依赖于计量经济模型，但RCEP最近于2022年生效，限制了它们捕捉新出现的结构轨迹的能力。本文对文莱、柬埔寨、老挝、缅甸和越南这五个被选为东盟欠发达成员国的经济体进行了早期结构映射。虽然只有柬埔寨、老挝和缅甸被联合国正式列为最不发达国家（LDCs），但文莱和越南也被包括在内，因为它们的结构性脆弱性限制了多样化和复原力。本文利用2009-2023年的数据，通过比较探索的方法追踪了长期动态。研究结果显示了明显的差异：越南和文莱表现出由高科技和信息通信技术导向的外国直接投资和出口多样化支持的工业和服务业主导的增长，而柬埔寨和老挝仍然主要以农业为基础，多样化有限；缅甸表现出适度但不均衡的多样化。尽早加入RCEP为这些国家提供了扩大市场准入、区域一体化和投资流入的潜在好处。对于柬埔寨、老挝和缅甸来说，在基础设施、劳动力发展和出口多样化方面制定有针对性的政策对于充分利用这些机会至关重要。

{"title":"RCEP and sectoral development in ASEAN less developed countries","authors":"Moudatsou Argiro , Spinthiropoulos Konstantinos","doi":"10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200159","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200159","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) is expected to reshape trade, investment, and sectoral dynamics across Asia, yet its implications for less-developed ASEAN members remain underexplored. Existing studies often rely on econometric modeling, but the recent entry into force of RCEP in 2022 limits their ability to capture emerging structural trajectories. This paper provides an early structural mapping of five economies—Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and Vietnam—selected as ASEAN's less-developed members. Although only Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar are formally classified by the United Nations as Least Developed Countries (LDCs), Brunei and Vietnam are included due to structural vulnerabilities that constrain diversification and resilience. Using 2009–2023 data, the paper traces long-term dynamics through a comparative exploratory approach. The findings reveal pronounced divergence: Vietnam and Brunei exhibit industrial and services-led growth supported by high-tech and ICT-oriented FDI and export diversification, while Cambodia and Laos remain largely agriculture-based with limited diversification; Myanmar shows moderate but uneven diversification. Early incorporation into RCEP offers these countries potential benefits through expanded market access, regional integration, and investment inflows. For Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar, targeted policies in infrastructure, workforce development, and export diversification will be critical to fully leverage these opportunities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45011,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Corporations Review","volume":"17 4","pages":"Article 200159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145839170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The regional comprehensive economic partnership: Issues and challenges for the Asia-Pacific region and the world 区域全面经济伙伴关系：亚太地区和世界面临的问题和挑战

IF 1.8 Q3 BUSINESS

Transnational Corporations Review

Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200161

Badar Iqbal, Mohd Nayyer Rahman Ph.D.

引用次数: 0

Trade policy uncertainty and agricultural exports: The mitigating roles of RTA and liberal democracies 贸易政策不确定性与农产品出口：区域贸易协定与自由民主的缓和作用

IF 1.8 Q3 BUSINESS

Transnational Corporations Review

Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200160

Jadhav Chakradhar , Adrija Ganguly , Rahul Nath Choudhury , Pravin Jadhav

In the context of heightened global uncertainty over economic and trade policies, this analysis examines how Trade Policy Uncertainty (TPU) impacts agricultural exports using two-way fixed effects and Panel Quantile Regression (PQR) methods. It studies the role of Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) and liberal democracies in mitigating the effect of the TPU on agricultural exports. The analysis covers 15 Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) countries from 1988 to 2023. The estimated results reveal that the lagged values of TPU specific to RCEP countries and the Global TPU exert negative and statistically significant effects on agricultural exports. The results of the panel quantile regression analysis reveal that the effects of the independent variables on agricultural exports are heterogeneous across different quantiles. The findings of this study suggest that regional trade agreements and higher levels of liberal democracy serve as mitigating factors, alleviating the adverse effects of trade policy uncertainty on agricultural exports. Based on these findings, our study significantly contributes to the empirical literature and offers valuable insights for policy making.

在全球经济和贸易政策不确定性加剧的背景下，本分析使用双向固定效应和面板分位数回归（PQR）方法研究了贸易政策不确定性（TPU）如何影响农业出口。它研究了区域贸易协定（rta）和自由民主国家在减轻TPU对农业出口的影响方面的作用。该分析涵盖了从1988年到2023年的15个区域全面经济伙伴关系（RCEP）国家。估计结果表明，RCEP国家特有的TPU滞后值和全球TPU滞后值对农业出口产生负向且统计显著的影响。面板分位数回归分析结果显示，自变量对农产品出口的影响在不同分位数之间存在异质性。本研究发现，区域贸易协定和较高程度的自由民主可以作为缓和因素，减轻贸易政策不确定性对农产品出口的不利影响。基于这些发现，我们的研究对实证文献有重要贡献，并为政策制定提供了有价值的见解。

{"title":"Trade policy uncertainty and agricultural exports: The mitigating roles of RTA and liberal democracies","authors":"Jadhav Chakradhar , Adrija Ganguly , Rahul Nath Choudhury , Pravin Jadhav","doi":"10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200160","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200160","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the context of heightened global uncertainty over economic and trade policies, this analysis examines how Trade Policy Uncertainty (TPU) impacts agricultural exports using two-way fixed effects and Panel Quantile Regression (PQR) methods. It studies the role of Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) and liberal democracies in mitigating the effect of the TPU on agricultural exports. The analysis covers 15 Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) countries from 1988 to 2023. The estimated results reveal that the lagged values of TPU specific to RCEP countries and the Global TPU exert negative and statistically significant effects on agricultural exports. The results of the panel quantile regression analysis reveal that the effects of the independent variables on agricultural exports are heterogeneous across different quantiles. The findings of this study suggest that regional trade agreements and higher levels of liberal democracy serve as mitigating factors, alleviating the adverse effects of trade policy uncertainty on agricultural exports. Based on these findings, our study significantly contributes to the empirical literature and offers valuable insights for policy making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45011,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Corporations Review","volume":"17 4","pages":"Article 200160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145839168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Exploring research trends in ASEAN and RCEP: A bibliometric study of tariffs and trade liberalization 探讨东盟与RCEP的研究趋势：关税与贸易自由化的文献计量学研究

IF 1.8 Q3 BUSINESS

Transnational Corporations Review

Pub Date : 2025-09-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200142

Yu Qing Soong , Wei Chien Ng , Sin Yin Teh

Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) have played a pivotal role in influencing international trade patterns over the years. Using tariff reduction and trade liberalization, ASEAN and RCEP are motivated to enhance the economy efficiency and competitiveness of its members which is proven to be one of the most important agenda in these economic structures. Therefore, this study seeks to examine the evolution of research surrounding ASEAN and RCEP economic frameworks, especially focusing on tariff and trade liberalization. This study used data extracted from Scopus database to perform bibliometric analysis. Through bibliometric analysis, this study uncovered the research trend, total publications, total citations and citation per paper. The most productive and authors, prominent journals, countries and institutions are revealed within these two significant economic frameworks. This study provides a foundational overview of existing literature on tariff and trade liberalization in ASEAN and RCEP, offering important implications for decision-makers, academics, and practitioners interested in the regional economic integration. Despite the increasing number of studies on ASEAN and RCEP, existing works remain scattered and lack systematic bibliometric analysis. This study addresses this gap by mapping the intellectual landscape by providing evidence-based insights that inform future research directions and regional policy discussions.

多年来，东南亚国家联盟（东盟）和区域全面经济伙伴关系（RCEP）在影响国际贸易格局方面发挥了关键作用。通过降低关税和贸易自由化，东盟和RCEP旨在提高其成员的经济效率和竞争力，这已被证明是这些经济结构中最重要的议程之一。因此，本研究旨在考察围绕东盟和RCEP经济框架的研究演变，特别是关注关税和贸易自由化。本研究采用Scopus数据库中提取的数据进行文献计量分析。通过文献计量分析，揭示了研究趋势、总发表数、总被引数和论文被引数。在这两个重要的经济框架中揭示了最具生产力和作者、著名期刊、国家和机构。本研究对东盟和RCEP关税和贸易自由化的现有文献进行了基本概述，为对区域经济一体化感兴趣的决策者、学者和实践者提供了重要启示。尽管对东盟和RCEP的研究越来越多，但现有的研究仍较为零散，缺乏系统的文献计量分析。本研究通过提供基于证据的见解，为未来的研究方向和区域政策讨论提供信息，从而绘制了知识格局，从而解决了这一差距。

{"title":"Exploring research trends in ASEAN and RCEP: A bibliometric study of tariffs and trade liberalization","authors":"Yu Qing Soong , Wei Chien Ng , Sin Yin Teh","doi":"10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200142","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200142","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) have played a pivotal role in influencing international trade patterns over the years. Using tariff reduction and trade liberalization, ASEAN and RCEP are motivated to enhance the economy efficiency and competitiveness of its members which is proven to be one of the most important agenda in these economic structures. Therefore, this study seeks to examine the evolution of research surrounding ASEAN and RCEP economic frameworks, especially focusing on tariff and trade liberalization. This study used data extracted from Scopus database to perform bibliometric analysis. Through bibliometric analysis, this study uncovered the research trend, total publications, total citations and citation per paper. The most productive and authors, prominent journals, countries and institutions are revealed within these two significant economic frameworks. This study provides a foundational overview of existing literature on tariff and trade liberalization in ASEAN and RCEP, offering important implications for decision-makers, academics, and practitioners interested in the regional economic integration. Despite the increasing number of studies on ASEAN and RCEP, existing works remain scattered and lack systematic bibliometric analysis. This study addresses this gap by mapping the intellectual landscape by providing evidence-based insights that inform future research directions and regional policy discussions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45011,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Corporations Review","volume":"17 4","pages":"Article 200142"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145108576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Impact of RCEP on Trade and FDI for East and Southeast Asian Economies RCEP对东亚和东南亚经济体贸易和外国直接投资的影响

IF 1.8 Q3 BUSINESS

Transnational Corporations Review

Pub Date : 2025-09-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200141

Sheereen Fauzel , Jeevita Matadeen , Verena Tandrayen Ragoobur , Leenshya Gunnoo

The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), the world's largest free-trade agreement, brings together a diverse group of 15 economies, to mutually benefit from an expansion in regional trade and investment, through reduced trade barriers and tariffs and enhanced regulatory coherence. This partnership will undeniably reshape regional economic dynamics. To better understand the ability of the RCEP to reshape the economic dynamics in the region, it is essential to evaluate its impact on trade and foreign direct investment (FDI). This paper therefore aims at critically evaluating RCEP's effects on trade and FDI in the East and South East Asian regions. Assessing the impact of RCEP on trade and FDI is crucial for policymakers, businesses, and investors, as it provides fundamental insights into how the agreement might drive economic growth, improve competitiveness, and promote regional and economic integration. Additionally, it will ensure that stakeholders are better equipped to navigate and capitalize on the opportunities associated with the agreement, while mitigating any potential downsides and overcoming inevitable challenges.

区域全面经济伙伴关系协定（RCEP）是世界上最大的自由贸易协定，汇集了15个不同的经济体，通过减少贸易壁垒和关税以及加强监管一致性，从区域贸易和投资的扩大中互利。这种伙伴关系无疑将重塑区域经济动态。为了更好地理解RCEP重塑该地区经济动态的能力，有必要评估其对贸易和外国直接投资（FDI）的影响。因此，本文旨在批判性地评估RCEP对东亚和东南亚地区贸易和外国直接投资的影响。评估RCEP对贸易和外国直接投资的影响对政策制定者、企业和投资者至关重要，因为它为了解该协定如何推动经济增长、提高竞争力、促进区域和经济一体化提供了根本性的见解。此外，它将确保利益相关者能够更好地驾驭和利用与协议相关的机会，同时减轻任何潜在的不利因素并克服不可避免的挑战。

{"title":"The Impact of RCEP on Trade and FDI for East and Southeast Asian Economies","authors":"Sheereen Fauzel , Jeevita Matadeen , Verena Tandrayen Ragoobur , Leenshya Gunnoo","doi":"10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200141","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200141","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), the world's largest free-trade agreement, brings together a diverse group of 15 economies, to mutually benefit from an expansion in regional trade and investment, through reduced trade barriers and tariffs and enhanced regulatory coherence. This partnership will undeniably reshape regional economic dynamics. To better understand the ability of the RCEP to reshape the economic dynamics in the region, it is essential to evaluate its impact on trade and foreign direct investment (FDI). This paper therefore aims at critically evaluating RCEP's effects on trade and FDI in the East and South East Asian regions. Assessing the impact of RCEP on trade and FDI is crucial for policymakers, businesses, and investors, as it provides fundamental insights into how the agreement might drive economic growth, improve competitiveness, and promote regional and economic integration. Additionally, it will ensure that stakeholders are better equipped to navigate and capitalize on the opportunities associated with the agreement, while mitigating any potential downsides and overcoming inevitable challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45011,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Corporations Review","volume":"17 4","pages":"Article 200141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145108577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

FDI and CSR in family business: Evidence from China 外商直接投资与家族企业社会责任：来自中国的证据

IF 1.8 Q3 BUSINESS

Transnational Corporations Review

Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200145

Lixia Wang , Xinyi Tang , Qinhua Yu , Yilin Du

Foreign direct investment (FDI) has become a significant source of funding for enterprises, particularly among family businesses in China in recent years. This paper examines the impact of FDI inflow on corporate social responsibility (CSR) through the lens of the spillover effect of FDI and the equity balance theory, utilizing data from listed family businesses in China from the year 2010–2019. Our findings indicate that: (1) FDI inflow positively influences the CSR of family businesses; and (2) the equity balance rate enhances the positive effect of FDI on the CSR of family businesses.

近年来，外商直接投资（FDI）已成为中国企业，尤其是家族企业的重要资金来源。本文利用2010-2019年中国上市家族企业的数据，通过FDI溢出效应和股权平衡理论，考察了FDI流入对企业社会责任的影响。研究结果表明：(1)FDI流入正向影响家族企业社会责任；(2)股权结余率增强了FDI对家族企业社会责任的正向作用。

引用次数: 0

Natural resources and economic growth in Asia: The moderating role of governance 亚洲自然资源与经济增长：治理的调节作用

IF 1.8 Q3 BUSINESS

Transnational Corporations Review

Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200143

Umar Farooq , Mosab I. Tabash , Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan

The current study extends the existing literature by exploring the moderating role of governance in the association between natural resources and economic growth. Using a large range of periods (1996–2019) of 48-Asian economies as a sample, this study employs the system GMM and FMOLS models to investigate proposed relationship. The analysis implies that natural resources have an adverse impact on economic growth. However, the interaction of a better governance system converts this curse impact of natural resources into blessings. The diffusion of a better governance system can enhance the efficiency of natural resources and thus more economic growth. The empirical analysis further discloses the moderating role of governance in the nexus between resource rents-economic growth. Policy officials should exercise better governance to enhance efficiency of natural resources. This study supplements the innovative thoughts regarding role of better governance systems in improving economic growth through channel of resource utilization.

本研究在现有文献的基础上，进一步探讨了治理在自然资源与经济增长关系中的调节作用。本研究以48个亚洲经济体的大范围时期（1996-2019）为样本，采用系统GMM和FMOLS模型来研究拟议的关系。分析表明，自然资源对经济增长有不利影响。然而，一个更好的治理体系的相互作用将自然资源的诅咒影响转化为祝福。更好的治理体系的扩散可以提高自然资源的效率，从而促进经济增长。实证分析进一步揭示了治理在资源租金-经济增长关系中的调节作用。政策官员应加强治理，提高自然资源的使用效率。本研究补充了关于完善治理制度通过资源利用渠道促进经济增长的创新思想。

引用次数: 0

Barriers of regional economic cooperation development: Theoretical perspectives 区域经济合作发展的障碍：理论视角

IF 1.8 Q3 BUSINESS

Transnational Corporations Review

Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200149

Ranti Yulia Wardani , Erwidodo , Umi Mu'awanah , Delima Hasri Azahari , Iwan Hermawan

The increasing number of regional cooperation developments has attracted many researchers and scholars to explore further. This paper has utilized theoretical perspectives in analyzing the development of regional cooperation of Southern African Development Community (SADC) and Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). This article explores the development of SADC and RCEP from the lens of regionalism, neoliberal institutionalism and linkage politics theories. This study is based on a combination of thorough literature review and semi-structured interviews. By drawing regionalism theory and utilizing neoliberal institutionalism, the results show that both SADC and RCEP have made adjustments despite the differences and have pursued common goals based on common interests as the basis of these formations under the common agendas that have been agreed on. From the lens of linkage politics theory shows that the paths to realize the common goals were challenging for both formations due to the different interests of many involving countries influenced by domestic level politics.

越来越多的区域合作发展吸引了许多研究人员和学者进一步探索。本文运用理论视角分析了南部非洲发展共同体（SADC）和区域全面经济伙伴关系（RCEP）的区域合作发展。本文从区域主义、新自由主义制度主义和联系政治理论的视角探讨了SADC和RCEP的发展。本研究采用文献综述和半结构化访谈相结合的方法。通过借鉴区域主义理论并运用新自由主义制度主义，研究结果表明，尽管存在差异，南共体和RCEP都进行了调整，并在已达成一致的共同议程下，以共同利益为基础追求共同目标。从联系政治理论的角度来看，由于受到国内政治的影响，许多相关国家的利益不同，两种形式实现共同目标的路径都具有挑战性。

{"title":"Barriers of regional economic cooperation development: Theoretical perspectives","authors":"Ranti Yulia Wardani , Erwidodo , Umi Mu'awanah , Delima Hasri Azahari , Iwan Hermawan","doi":"10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200149","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200149","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The increasing number of regional cooperation developments has attracted many researchers and scholars to explore further. This paper has utilized theoretical perspectives in analyzing the development of regional cooperation of Southern African Development Community (SADC) and Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). This article explores the development of SADC and RCEP from the lens of regionalism, neoliberal institutionalism and linkage politics theories. This study is based on a combination of thorough literature review and semi-structured interviews. By drawing regionalism theory and utilizing neoliberal institutionalism, the results show that both SADC and RCEP have made adjustments despite the differences and have pursued common goals based on common interests as the basis of these formations under the common agendas that have been agreed on. From the lens of linkage politics theory shows that the paths to realize the common goals were challenging for both formations due to the different interests of many involving countries influenced by domestic level politics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45011,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Corporations Review","volume":"17 3","pages":"Article 200149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145105701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Structural breaks in global stock markets: Are they caused by pandemics, protests or other factors? 全球股市的结构性崩溃：是由流行病、抗议活动还是其他因素造成的？

IF 1.8 Q3 BUSINESS

Transnational Corporations Review

Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200147

Joshua A. Ndako , Terver T. Kumeka , Festus F. Adedoyin , Simplice A. Asongu

The study examines the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and other global events on the global stock market, focusing on 16 countries of the world using quarterly data ranging from 1919Q1 to 2020Q2. While selected sample countries in Europe have at least ten break dates under the period of investigation, the US, Canada and Australia, have only twelve break dates. Asia and the other bloc of countries report ten and twelve break dates respectively. One most prominent cause of structural changes in stock markets (with the exclusion of Germany) appears to be from the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), which had inverse effects on major markets around the world. The most prominent source of structural breaks in the Asian markets appears to be from the 2008–2009 GFC. In addition, we found evidence of structural breaks in several stock markets in the world, resulting from the 2009–2010 Global Pandemic.

该研究考察了COVID-19大流行和其他全球事件对全球股市的影响，重点关注世界16个国家，使用了1919年第一季度至2020年第二季度的季度数据。在调查期间，欧洲选定的样本国家至少有10个休息日期，而美国、加拿大和澳大利亚只有12个休息日期。亚洲和其他集团国家分别报告了10个和12个休假日期。股市结构性变化的一个最突出的原因（德国除外）似乎来自全球金融危机（GFC），它对全球主要市场产生了相反的影响。亚洲市场结构性崩溃的最主要原因似乎来自2008-2009年的全球金融危机。此外，我们还发现了2009-2010年全球大流行导致世界上几个股票市场出现结构性断裂的证据。

引用次数: 0

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

Transnational Corporations Review

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀