首页 > 最新文献

Review of Education最新文献

英文 中文
Trends and insights in e‐learning in medical education: A bibliometric analysis 医学教育中电子学习的趋势和见解:文献计量分析
Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI: 10.1002/rev3.3431
Deborah Oluwadele, Yashik Singh, Timothy T. Adeliyi
Abstract Medical education is vital in producing competent healthcare professionals and advancing medical knowledge. The integration of e‐learning has emerged as a transformative approach to enhance medical education by improving accessibility, cost‐effectiveness and interactive learning experiences. With the COVID‐19 pandemic further accelerating e‐learning adoption, analysing the trends, publication collaborations and publication patterns in this domain is crucial. This study conducted a bibliometric analysis of published documents on the Scopus database in e‐learning in medical education to explore the trends in scientific productivity. Publications in the domain has sporadically increased since the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic. The pandemic introduces a changing focus in research and emerging trends, with COVID‐19 becoming a dominant topic and emerging theme. A collaborative research environment exists between authors; however, there is a divide between developed and developing countries in publication distribution, emphasising the need for equitable participation. This study contributes to a comprehensive understanding of e‐learning in medical education, emphasising collaboration, publication patterns, emerging trends, and the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Researchers can leverage these findings to advance e‐learning in medical education and enhance the quality of medical training and education. Context and implications Rationale for this study The COVID‐19 pandemic reshaped medical education, emphasising e‐learning's potential for teaching and learning continuity during lockdowns. Bibliometric analysis is needed to examine trends in e‐learning within medical education. Why the new findings matter The landscape of publications in e‐learning in medical education has changed; the bibliometric analysis of trends in the domain reveals key themes, pandemic response, challenges and opportunities to inform future research in the domain. Implications for educational researchers and policy makers Funders and institutions need to encourage collaboration between developed and developing countries to bridge the publication disparities in the domain. Developed countries can share resources, while developing countries bring fresh perspectives in their context. It is important for educators and researcher in medical education to report the implementation of e‐learning with specific details on the critical success factor of e‐learning in their context. This can provide a baseline for others to understand how to optimise the implementation of e‐learning to make it more suitable in their context.
医学教育对培养合格的卫生保健专业人员和提高医学知识水平至关重要。电子学习的整合已经成为一种变革性的方法,通过改善可及性、成本效益和互动学习体验来加强医学教育。随着COVID - 19大流行进一步加速了电子学习的采用,分析这一领域的趋势、出版合作和出版模式至关重要。本研究对Scopus数据库中关于医学教育电子学习的已发表文献进行了文献计量分析,以探讨科学生产力的趋势。自COVID - 19大流行爆发以来,该领域的出版物零星增加。大流行引起了研究重点和新趋势的变化,COVID - 19成为一个主导话题和新兴主题。作者之间存在合作研究环境;然而,发达国家和发展中国家在出版物分发方面存在着差距,这强调了公平参与的必要性。本研究有助于全面了解医学教育中的电子学习,强调协作、出版模式、新兴趋势以及COVID - 19大流行的影响。研究人员可以利用这些发现来推进医学教育中的电子学习,提高医学培训和教育的质量。COVID - 19大流行重塑了医学教育,强调了电子学习在封锁期间教学和学习连续性的潜力。需要文献计量分析来检查医学教育中电子学习的趋势。医学教育中电子学习的出版物格局发生了变化;该领域趋势的文献计量分析揭示了关键主题、流行病应对、挑战和机遇,为该领域未来的研究提供信息。对教育研究人员和决策者的影响资助者和机构需要鼓励发达国家和发展中国家之间的合作,以弥合该领域的出版差距。发达国家可以分享资源,而发展中国家则在其背景下带来新的视角。对于医学教育工作者和研究人员来说,报告电子学习的实施情况,并详细说明电子学习在他们的环境中取得成功的关键因素是很重要的。这可以为其他人提供一个基线,以了解如何优化电子学习的实施,使其更适合他们的环境。
{"title":"Trends and insights in e‐learning in medical education: A bibliometric analysis","authors":"Deborah Oluwadele, Yashik Singh, Timothy T. Adeliyi","doi":"10.1002/rev3.3431","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3431","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Medical education is vital in producing competent healthcare professionals and advancing medical knowledge. The integration of e‐learning has emerged as a transformative approach to enhance medical education by improving accessibility, cost‐effectiveness and interactive learning experiences. With the COVID‐19 pandemic further accelerating e‐learning adoption, analysing the trends, publication collaborations and publication patterns in this domain is crucial. This study conducted a bibliometric analysis of published documents on the Scopus database in e‐learning in medical education to explore the trends in scientific productivity. Publications in the domain has sporadically increased since the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic. The pandemic introduces a changing focus in research and emerging trends, with COVID‐19 becoming a dominant topic and emerging theme. A collaborative research environment exists between authors; however, there is a divide between developed and developing countries in publication distribution, emphasising the need for equitable participation. This study contributes to a comprehensive understanding of e‐learning in medical education, emphasising collaboration, publication patterns, emerging trends, and the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Researchers can leverage these findings to advance e‐learning in medical education and enhance the quality of medical training and education. Context and implications Rationale for this study The COVID‐19 pandemic reshaped medical education, emphasising e‐learning's potential for teaching and learning continuity during lockdowns. Bibliometric analysis is needed to examine trends in e‐learning within medical education. Why the new findings matter The landscape of publications in e‐learning in medical education has changed; the bibliometric analysis of trends in the domain reveals key themes, pandemic response, challenges and opportunities to inform future research in the domain. Implications for educational researchers and policy makers Funders and institutions need to encourage collaboration between developed and developing countries to bridge the publication disparities in the domain. Developed countries can share resources, while developing countries bring fresh perspectives in their context. It is important for educators and researcher in medical education to report the implementation of e‐learning with specific details on the critical success factor of e‐learning in their context. This can provide a baseline for others to understand how to optimise the implementation of e‐learning to make it more suitable in their context.","PeriodicalId":45076,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136069312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
There is still little or no evidence that systematic phonics is more effective than common alternative methods of reading instruction: Response to Brooks (2023) 仍然很少或没有证据表明系统的自然拼读法比其他常见的阅读教学方法更有效:对Brooks(2023)的回应
Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI: 10.1002/rev3.3432
Jeffrey S. Bowers
Abstract Brooks (2023) rejects Bowers' (2020) conclusion that there is little or no evidence that systematic phonics is more effective than alternative teaching methods common in schools. He makes his case based on challenging my analysis of 4 or the 12 meta‐analyses reviewed in Bowers (2020). I show his criticisms are flawed and conclusions are unwarranted. I also briefly review the more recent PIRLS results that have been taken to support the claim that mandated synthetic systematic phonics has improved reading comprehension in England. This conclusion is also shown to be unjustified. I conclude there is still no reliable evidence that systematic phonics is best practice, that researchers should stop making strong claims based on the current evidence, and that the field needs to explore alternative approaches.
布鲁克斯(2023)反对鲍尔斯(2020)的结论,即几乎没有证据表明系统语音比学校常见的其他教学方法更有效。他在挑战我对Bowers(2020)中回顾的4个或12个元分析的分析的基础上提出了自己的观点。我指出他的批评是有缺陷的,结论是没有根据的。我还简要回顾了最近的PIRLS结果,这些结果支持了强制性合成系统拼读法提高了英国人的阅读理解能力的说法。这一结论也被证明是不合理的。我的结论是,仍然没有可靠的证据表明系统语音是最佳实践,研究人员应该停止根据现有证据提出强有力的主张,该领域需要探索替代方法。
{"title":"There is still little or no evidence that systematic phonics is more effective than common alternative methods of reading instruction: Response to Brooks (2023)","authors":"Jeffrey S. Bowers","doi":"10.1002/rev3.3432","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3432","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Brooks (2023) rejects Bowers' (2020) conclusion that there is little or no evidence that systematic phonics is more effective than alternative teaching methods common in schools. He makes his case based on challenging my analysis of 4 or the 12 meta‐analyses reviewed in Bowers (2020). I show his criticisms are flawed and conclusions are unwarranted. I also briefly review the more recent PIRLS results that have been taken to support the claim that mandated synthetic systematic phonics has improved reading comprehension in England. This conclusion is also shown to be unjustified. I conclude there is still no reliable evidence that systematic phonics is best practice, that researchers should stop making strong claims based on the current evidence, and that the field needs to explore alternative approaches.","PeriodicalId":45076,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135618227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to ‘Critical digital literacies at school level: A systematic review’ 对“学校层面的关键数字素养:系统回顾”的修正
Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI: 10.1002/rev3.3434
{"title":"Correction to ‘Critical digital literacies at school level: A systematic review’","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/rev3.3434","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3434","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45076,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135618462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emotions and digital storytelling in the educational context: A systematic review 教育背景下的情感和数字叙事:系统回顾
Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI: 10.1002/rev3.3430
Hatice Çıralı Sarıca
Abstract Both emotions and digital storytelling (DST) have an important role in learning‐teaching processes. Emotions are also important for DST. There is currently much interest in how emotion and DST are addressed together in education, how relations are established, how they are grounded and what the outcomes are. There is a need for a systematic review study in order to find answers to these questions and to give direction to new researches. This systematic review study presents an overview of emotion and DST research trends (in terms of their demographics, research foci and issues) in an educational context, how they are theoretically grounded, and their outcomes. Seventy research articles were reviewed using a mixed‐method approach combining systematic mapping and systematic review. In the studies reviewed, DST serves emotional outcomes as a learning design, multimodal pedagogy, pedagogical method, practice or tool for students, teachers, adults and families. DST provides an emotional connection, engagement, experience and safe space; supports the development of self‐dynamics such as self‐reflection and self‐awareness of emotions; facilitates emotional sharing and empathy; and develops emotional skills in the learning‐teaching process. In addition, it is found that there are deficiencies in the theoretical frameworks of the studies. Finally, the results are discussed and directions for future studies are suggested.
情感和数字叙事(DST)在学习-教学过程中都发挥着重要作用。情绪对夏令时也很重要。目前,人们对情感和DST如何在教育中一起处理,如何建立关系,如何建立基础以及结果如何非常感兴趣。为了找到这些问题的答案,并为新的研究指明方向,有必要进行系统的综述研究。本系统综述研究概述了教育背景下的情感和DST研究趋势(从人口统计学、研究重点和问题方面)、理论基础及其结果。采用系统制图和系统评价相结合的混合方法对70篇研究论文进行了综述。在回顾的研究中,DST将情感结果作为一种学习设计、多模态教学法、教学方法、实践或工具提供给学生、教师、成人和家庭。DST提供情感联系、参与、体验和安全空间;支持自我动力的发展,如自我反思和自我意识的情绪;促进情感分享和同理心;并在教与学的过程中发展情感技能。此外,还发现研究的理论框架存在不足之处。最后对研究结果进行了讨论,并对今后的研究方向提出了建议。
{"title":"Emotions and digital storytelling in the educational context: A systematic review","authors":"Hatice Çıralı Sarıca","doi":"10.1002/rev3.3430","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3430","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Both emotions and digital storytelling (DST) have an important role in learning‐teaching processes. Emotions are also important for DST. There is currently much interest in how emotion and DST are addressed together in education, how relations are established, how they are grounded and what the outcomes are. There is a need for a systematic review study in order to find answers to these questions and to give direction to new researches. This systematic review study presents an overview of emotion and DST research trends (in terms of their demographics, research foci and issues) in an educational context, how they are theoretically grounded, and their outcomes. Seventy research articles were reviewed using a mixed‐method approach combining systematic mapping and systematic review. In the studies reviewed, DST serves emotional outcomes as a learning design, multimodal pedagogy, pedagogical method, practice or tool for students, teachers, adults and families. DST provides an emotional connection, engagement, experience and safe space; supports the development of self‐dynamics such as self‐reflection and self‐awareness of emotions; facilitates emotional sharing and empathy; and develops emotional skills in the learning‐teaching process. In addition, it is found that there are deficiencies in the theoretical frameworks of the studies. Finally, the results are discussed and directions for future studies are suggested.","PeriodicalId":45076,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135884573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Teaching phonics and reading effectively: ‘A balancing act’ for teachers, policy makers and researchers 有效地教授自然拼读和阅读:教师、政策制定者和研究人员的“平衡之举”
Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-10-09 DOI: 10.1002/rev3.3429
Dominic Wyse, Alice Bradbury
Abstract The debates about what are the most effective ways to teach young children to learn to read have been described as ‘the reading wars’. In 2022 the research published in a paper by Wyse and Bradbury (2022) stimulated widespread attention including in the media. Wyse and Bradbury concluded on the basis of four major research analyses that although systematic phonics teaching was important the approach in England to synthetic phonics was too narrow and therefore in need of improvement. In 2023 the paper was the subject of a critique by Greg Brooks (2023). This paper responds to Brooks' critique by providing new information about the nature of the responses to the paper to contextualise Brooks' response. It is concluded that Brooks' response includes too many errors, and is too selective, to be regarded as a robust and reasonable critique. It is argued that the nature of Brooks' approach to criticism only serves to entrench the reading wars, and raises ethical considerations about the nature of the attack on Wyse and Bradbury (2022). Context and implications Rationale for this study This paper responds to Greg Brooks' (2023) criticisms of Wyse and Bradbury (2022). Why the new findings matter It is important that the erroneous views expressed in Brooks (2023) are corrected because the debates about reading have important consequences for young children's education. Implications for practitioners, policy makers, researchers Understanding the most effective ways to teach reading is important for children's education worldwide. Research is a source of vital knowledge about what are the most effective ways to teach reading. Interpreting research findings accurately and in a balanced way in order to make recommendations about curriculum policies and classroom practice is vital to ensure that any such recommendations are well justified. Imbalanced and erroneous accounts risk non‐optimal teaching and educational policies, and hence negative consequences for children's learning.
关于什么是教幼儿学习阅读最有效的方法的争论被称为“阅读战争”。2022年,Wyse和Bradbury(2022)在一篇论文中发表的研究引起了包括媒体在内的广泛关注。Wyse和Bradbury在四项主要研究分析的基础上得出结论,尽管系统的语音教学很重要,但英国的综合语音教学方法过于狭隘,因此需要改进。在2023年,这篇论文是格雷格·布鲁克斯(2023)批评的主题。本文对布鲁克斯的批评做出了回应,提供了关于对论文回应的性质的新信息,将布鲁克斯的回应置于语境中。结论是,布鲁克斯的回应包含了太多的错误,而且太有选择性,不能被视为一个有力的和合理的批评。有人认为,布鲁克斯的批评方法的本质只是为了巩固阅读战争,并提出了对Wyse和Bradbury(2022)攻击性质的伦理考虑。本文回应了Greg Brooks(2023)对Wyse and Bradbury(2022)的批评。重要的是,布鲁克斯(2023)中表达的错误观点得到纠正,因为关于阅读的辩论对幼儿教育有重要影响。了解最有效的阅读教学方法对全世界的儿童教育都很重要。研究是最有效的阅读教学方法的重要知识来源。为了对课程政策和课堂实践提出建议,准确和平衡地解释研究结果对于确保任何此类建议都是合理的至关重要。不平衡和错误的账目有可能导致非最佳教学和教育政策,从而对儿童的学习产生负面影响。
{"title":"Teaching phonics and reading effectively: ‘A balancing act’ for teachers, policy makers and researchers","authors":"Dominic Wyse, Alice Bradbury","doi":"10.1002/rev3.3429","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3429","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The debates about what are the most effective ways to teach young children to learn to read have been described as ‘the reading wars’. In 2022 the research published in a paper by Wyse and Bradbury (2022) stimulated widespread attention including in the media. Wyse and Bradbury concluded on the basis of four major research analyses that although systematic phonics teaching was important the approach in England to synthetic phonics was too narrow and therefore in need of improvement. In 2023 the paper was the subject of a critique by Greg Brooks (2023). This paper responds to Brooks' critique by providing new information about the nature of the responses to the paper to contextualise Brooks' response. It is concluded that Brooks' response includes too many errors, and is too selective, to be regarded as a robust and reasonable critique. It is argued that the nature of Brooks' approach to criticism only serves to entrench the reading wars, and raises ethical considerations about the nature of the attack on Wyse and Bradbury (2022). Context and implications Rationale for this study This paper responds to Greg Brooks' (2023) criticisms of Wyse and Bradbury (2022). Why the new findings matter It is important that the erroneous views expressed in Brooks (2023) are corrected because the debates about reading have important consequences for young children's education. Implications for practitioners, policy makers, researchers Understanding the most effective ways to teach reading is important for children's education worldwide. Research is a source of vital knowledge about what are the most effective ways to teach reading. Interpreting research findings accurately and in a balanced way in order to make recommendations about curriculum policies and classroom practice is vital to ensure that any such recommendations are well justified. Imbalanced and erroneous accounts risk non‐optimal teaching and educational policies, and hence negative consequences for children's learning.","PeriodicalId":45076,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135146288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Educational technology for reading instruction in developing countries: A systematic literature review 发展中国家阅读教学的教育技术:系统的文献综述
Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-10-02 DOI: 10.1002/rev3.3423
Andrea Norman
Abstract Despite significant initiatives to improve education globally, policy makers and researchers are concerned about literacy outcomes in developing countries, as students lack basic literacy skills even after many years in schooling. Educational technology has been championed as a potential solution to low‐quality education in developing countries, yet little rigorous research on this topic exists. Since Covid‐19 has caused enormous global disruption and teachers have been forced to adopt technology globally, research into the effectiveness of using technology for teaching literacy in low‐income contexts is vital. This systematic review of the literature analyses and synthesises the range of international research available on educational technology to improve reading in developing countries. This review includes primary qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, which were analysed using thematic synthesis. The review concludes that there is some suggestive evidence that reasons for the success of educational technology literacy interventions may include ongoing teacher professional development, interactive multimedia features, and a focus on phonics and progressive reading skills. The current limited research base supports technology designs that are adaptive, engaging, and child‐centred, utilising software that can differentiate for students' levels. Engaging the community using context‐specific resources and incorporating the technology into a broader literacy programme and pedagogy, were also features highlighted in multiple studies. However, with a limited number of studies the strength of the evidence is weak; therefore, definitive conclusions cannot be made. The findings provide some suggestive evidence that could guide future research. Context and implications Rationale for this study This systematic review addresses the gap in current research into which types of educational technology are effective for the teaching of reading in developing countries. By synthesising the findings of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies, this review presents tentative recommendations for policy makers and future research. Why the new findings matter The findings present specific features of effective educational technologies that could be used by policy makers to improve literacy outcomes. This is directly relevant for the millions of students in developing countries who lack literacy skills even after many years in school. Educational technology is widely used and promoted as a solution for improving educational or literacy outcomes in developing countries, yet little rigorous research exists. This systematic review addresses this by synthesising existing research and highlighting areas for future research. Since Covid‐19 caused teachers to adopt technology globally, research into the effectiveness of using technology for teaching literacy in low‐income contexts is vital. Implications for research and practice This
尽管在全球范围内采取了重大举措来改善教育,但政策制定者和研究人员对发展中国家的扫盲结果感到担忧,因为学生在接受多年教育后仍缺乏基本的扫盲技能。教育技术被认为是发展中国家低质量教育的潜在解决方案,但这方面的严谨研究很少。由于Covid - 19造成了巨大的全球破坏,教师被迫在全球范围内采用技术,因此研究在低收入背景下使用技术进行扫盲教学的有效性至关重要。本文对文献进行了系统回顾,分析并综合了有关提高发展中国家阅读能力的教育技术的国际研究范围。本综述包括主要的定性、定量和混合方法研究,并采用专题综合方法进行分析。这篇综述的结论是,有一些暗示性的证据表明,教育技术素养干预成功的原因可能包括教师持续的专业发展、交互式多媒体功能、对自然拼读法和渐进式阅读技能的关注。目前有限的研究基地支持适应性强、引人入胜、以儿童为中心的技术设计,利用能够区分学生水平的软件。利用特定环境的资源吸引社区参与,并将技术纳入更广泛的扫盲计划和教学方法,也是多项研究强调的特点。然而,由于研究数量有限,证据的强度很弱;因此,不能作出明确的结论。这些发现为指导未来的研究提供了一些有启发性的证据。本研究的背景和含义本研究的基本原理本系统综述解决了目前关于哪些类型的教育技术对发展中国家的阅读教学有效的研究中的空白。通过综合定性、定量和混合方法的初步研究结果,本综述为政策制定者和未来的研究提出了初步建议。这些发现展示了有效教育技术的具体特征,政策制定者可以利用这些特征来提高扫盲结果。这直接关系到发展中国家数以百万计的学生,即使在学校学习多年,他们仍然缺乏读写技能。在发展中国家,教育技术作为改善教育或扫盲成果的解决方案被广泛使用和推广,但很少有严谨的研究。本系统综述通过综合现有研究和突出未来研究领域来解决这一问题。由于Covid - 19导致教师在全球范围内采用技术,因此研究在低收入背景下使用技术进行扫盲教学的有效性至关重要。本系统综述综合了当前的研究,以便政策制定者在设计干预措施时具有指导方针。该综述为研究人员提供了现有文献和空白的全面地图。基于这一系统综述的发现,鼓励政策制定者考虑技术如何通过多媒体和互动功能吸引学生,如何适应当地环境和语言,以及如何根据学生的不同能力水平进行区分。决策者还应考虑技术如何通过特定阅读技能的框架来支持学生的学习,并将其与更广泛的扫盲计划、教师培训和当地课程整体联系起来。由于这一领域的高质量数据很少,这些政策建议是试探性的,建议未来的研究进一步探索在许多成功干预措施中发现的一些有希望的特征。
{"title":"Educational technology for reading instruction in developing countries: A systematic literature review","authors":"Andrea Norman","doi":"10.1002/rev3.3423","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3423","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Despite significant initiatives to improve education globally, policy makers and researchers are concerned about literacy outcomes in developing countries, as students lack basic literacy skills even after many years in schooling. Educational technology has been championed as a potential solution to low‐quality education in developing countries, yet little rigorous research on this topic exists. Since Covid‐19 has caused enormous global disruption and teachers have been forced to adopt technology globally, research into the effectiveness of using technology for teaching literacy in low‐income contexts is vital. This systematic review of the literature analyses and synthesises the range of international research available on educational technology to improve reading in developing countries. This review includes primary qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, which were analysed using thematic synthesis. The review concludes that there is some suggestive evidence that reasons for the success of educational technology literacy interventions may include ongoing teacher professional development, interactive multimedia features, and a focus on phonics and progressive reading skills. The current limited research base supports technology designs that are adaptive, engaging, and child‐centred, utilising software that can differentiate for students' levels. Engaging the community using context‐specific resources and incorporating the technology into a broader literacy programme and pedagogy, were also features highlighted in multiple studies. However, with a limited number of studies the strength of the evidence is weak; therefore, definitive conclusions cannot be made. The findings provide some suggestive evidence that could guide future research. Context and implications Rationale for this study This systematic review addresses the gap in current research into which types of educational technology are effective for the teaching of reading in developing countries. By synthesising the findings of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies, this review presents tentative recommendations for policy makers and future research. Why the new findings matter The findings present specific features of effective educational technologies that could be used by policy makers to improve literacy outcomes. This is directly relevant for the millions of students in developing countries who lack literacy skills even after many years in school. Educational technology is widely used and promoted as a solution for improving educational or literacy outcomes in developing countries, yet little rigorous research exists. This systematic review addresses this by synthesising existing research and highlighting areas for future research. Since Covid‐19 caused teachers to adopt technology globally, research into the effectiveness of using technology for teaching literacy in low‐income contexts is vital. Implications for research and practice This","PeriodicalId":45076,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education","volume":"144 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135833423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding identity salience and English as a Foreign Language teaching practices: A case study of multi‐subject generalist teachers 认同显著性与对外英语教学实践——以多学科通才教师为例
Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI: 10.1002/rev3.3424
Md. Saiful Alam, Adelina Asmawi
Abstract The scarcity of teachers worldwide has led to educators teaching multiple subjects outside their area of expertise. This challenge of teaching out‐of‐field or multi‐subject instruction raises the need for (re)constructing the identity of multi‐subject generalist teachers (M‐SGTs). However, the matter has received little attention in current literature. This study aimed to explore the process by which M‐SGTs develop a salient identity as EFL teachers and how this identity impacts their practices in teaching EFL. To achieve this, a case‐study approach was employed, and six M‐SGTs from three private kindergarten schools in rural Bangladesh were selected using convenient sampling. Data were gathered from observation protocols, semi‐structured interviews, and documents. The interviews and observation protocols were transcribed and coded, while the documents were reviewed thematically and categorically in line with Kvale's recommendations. The results of this investigation highlight the complex and multifaceted nature of the development of salient identity as EFL teachers among M‐SGTs. The study reveals that M‐SGTs develop a strong identity as EFL teachers through negotiation, adaptation, subject selection, confidence, language acquisition experience, pre‐service pedagogical skills, social support, positive feedback and endorsement by principals. The study also finds that M‐SGTs' salient identity is reflected in their teaching practices that involve being role models, adapting English language instruction, employing interactivity, differentiation in pedagogy, comprehensive feedback, whole‐class teaching and the use of supplementary materials. This paper ends with an important implication.
世界范围内教师的稀缺导致教育工作者在他们的专业领域之外教授多个科目。教学领域外或多学科教学的挑战提出了(重新)构建多学科通才教师(M - sgt)身份的需要。然而,这一问题在当前文献中很少得到关注。本研究旨在探讨M - sgt作为英语教师形成显著身份的过程,以及这种身份如何影响他们的英语教学实践。为了实现这一目标,采用了案例研究方法,采用方便抽样的方法从孟加拉国农村的三所私立幼儿园中选择了六名M - sgt。数据收集自观察方案、半结构化访谈和文件。采访和观察记录已被抄录和编码,而文件则按照Kvale的建议按主题和分类进行审查。这项调查的结果突出了M - sgt中作为英语教师的显著认同发展的复杂性和多面性。研究表明,M - sgt通过谈判、适应、学科选择、自信、语言习得经验、职前教学技能、社会支持、积极反馈和校长认可,形成了强烈的英语教师身份认同。研究还发现,M - sgt的显著特征体现在他们的教学实践中,包括成为榜样、适应英语语言教学、采用互动性、差异化教学法、全面反馈、全班授课和使用补充材料。本文的结尾有一个重要的含义。
{"title":"Understanding identity salience and English as a Foreign Language teaching practices: A case study of <scp>multi‐subject</scp> generalist teachers","authors":"Md. Saiful Alam, Adelina Asmawi","doi":"10.1002/rev3.3424","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3424","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The scarcity of teachers worldwide has led to educators teaching multiple subjects outside their area of expertise. This challenge of teaching out‐of‐field or multi‐subject instruction raises the need for (re)constructing the identity of multi‐subject generalist teachers (M‐SGTs). However, the matter has received little attention in current literature. This study aimed to explore the process by which M‐SGTs develop a salient identity as EFL teachers and how this identity impacts their practices in teaching EFL. To achieve this, a case‐study approach was employed, and six M‐SGTs from three private kindergarten schools in rural Bangladesh were selected using convenient sampling. Data were gathered from observation protocols, semi‐structured interviews, and documents. The interviews and observation protocols were transcribed and coded, while the documents were reviewed thematically and categorically in line with Kvale's recommendations. The results of this investigation highlight the complex and multifaceted nature of the development of salient identity as EFL teachers among M‐SGTs. The study reveals that M‐SGTs develop a strong identity as EFL teachers through negotiation, adaptation, subject selection, confidence, language acquisition experience, pre‐service pedagogical skills, social support, positive feedback and endorsement by principals. The study also finds that M‐SGTs' salient identity is reflected in their teaching practices that involve being role models, adapting English language instruction, employing interactivity, differentiation in pedagogy, comprehensive feedback, whole‐class teaching and the use of supplementary materials. This paper ends with an important implication.","PeriodicalId":45076,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135425688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Teacher surveys: The pros and cons of random probability surveys versus teacher panels 教师调查:随机概率调查与教师小组调查的利弊
Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI: 10.1002/rev3.3428
John Jerrim
Abstract Two commonly used approaches to capturing information about teachers are random probability surveys and teacher panels. This paper reviews the strengths and limitations of these two approaches in the context of capturing information about the teacher workforce. A case study is then presented drawing upon recent teacher survey data collections in England. Although both designs should continue to play an important role in generating evidence about the teaching profession, random probability surveys of teachers should be used sparingly, and only when they will be properly resourced.
摘要获取教师信息的两种常用方法是随机概率调查和教师小组调查。本文回顾了这两种方法在获取教师劳动力信息方面的优势和局限性。一个案例研究,然后提出借鉴最近的教师调查数据收集在英国。尽管这两种设计都应该继续在产生关于教师职业的证据方面发挥重要作用,但对教师的随机概率调查应该有节制地使用,而且只有在它们得到适当资源的情况下才应该使用。
{"title":"Teacher surveys: The pros and cons of random probability surveys versus teacher panels","authors":"John Jerrim","doi":"10.1002/rev3.3428","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3428","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Two commonly used approaches to capturing information about teachers are random probability surveys and teacher panels. This paper reviews the strengths and limitations of these two approaches in the context of capturing information about the teacher workforce. A case study is then presented drawing upon recent teacher survey data collections in England. Although both designs should continue to play an important role in generating evidence about the teaching profession, random probability surveys of teachers should be used sparingly, and only when they will be properly resourced.","PeriodicalId":45076,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135425368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Empathy in group musical performance: A review of the literature 团体音乐表演中的共情:文献综述
Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI: 10.1002/rev3.3426
Pablo Davila‐Barrio, Cristina Arriaga, Alberto Cabedo‐Mas
Abstract Empathy plays a fundamental role in the prosocial development of young people today as an essential skill for interacting with other human beings. Music, particularly in a small group set up, offers a fitting context for its development. This article presents a review of the different studies and investigations that examine the effects that the development of empathic capacity can produce in small group instrumental practice, the capacity of empathy to induce modifications in the final result of a small group musical interpretation, and empathy and its relationship with small group musical interpretation from the field of education. The aim of this article is to review and analyse literature on how empathy is researched in the context of small group (between 2 and 10 individuals) music performance in order to enquire if the empathic ability constitutes a basic and decisive foundation in the development of multiple actions executed jointly with other individuals. For that purpose, different aspects are analysed: (1) definition of empathy and how it is measured; (2) the instruments used for its measurement; (3) the characteristics of the participants in the studies and their level of music experience; and (4) the type of activities undertaken. The analysis of the results indicates that defining empathy in this context is an ongoing process, and the concept is measured by standardised and ad hoc tests. It also shows that the type of studies and activities are related to the discipline in which they are carried out. Notably, there is a lack of studies regarding the field of study and the age and the level of musical experience of the performers. Context and implications Rationale for this study Empathy is considered a fundamental social ability to communicate. This review aims to analyse how empathy is researched in the context of a small music group set up in order to explore the state of empathy in group music performance and its benefits of developing social and emotional abilities in music students. Why the new findings matter This review provides details of research that reports the benefits of promoting empathy in a small music group set up and presents evidence that there are no standard ways of researching empathy in this sphere. Implications for researchers and music educators The emerging findings of this review affirm that promoting empathy in the context of a small music group set up affects students' social and emotional abilities. However, there is still no consensus of a standardised way to research empathy. The implications extend to researchers, who need to do more investigations on empathy not only in the sphere of music performance or music education but also in other spheres in order to narrow a way of standardising methods to research empathy. Moreover, this review is a call for all music educators, to implement and develop empathy through their daily educational strategies.
摘要共情作为一种与他人交往的基本技能,在当今青少年的亲社会发展中起着重要的作用。音乐,特别是在一个小群体中,为其发展提供了一个合适的背景。本文综述了不同的研究和调查,这些研究和调查从教育领域考察了共情能力的发展在小组乐器练习中产生的影响,共情能力导致小组音乐演绎最终结果的修改,以及共情及其与小组音乐演绎的关系。本文的目的是回顾和分析关于如何在小团体(2到10个人)音乐表演的背景下研究共情的文献,以探究共情能力是否构成与其他个体共同执行的多种行动发展的基本和决定性基础。为此,本文分析了以下几个方面:(1)共情的定义及其测量方法;(二)计量器具;(3)研究对象的特点及其音乐体验水平;(四)从事的活动类型。对结果的分析表明,在这种情况下定义共情是一个持续的过程,这个概念是通过标准化和特设测试来衡量的。它还表明,研究和活动的类型与进行研究和活动的学科有关。值得注意的是,缺乏关于学习领域和表演者年龄和音乐经验水平的研究。共情被认为是一种基本的社会沟通能力。本文旨在分析在一个小型音乐团体的背景下,如何研究共情,以探讨团体音乐表演中的共情状态及其对音乐学生社会和情感能力发展的益处。这篇综述提供了一些研究的细节,这些研究报告了在一个小型音乐小组中促进同理心的好处,并提供了证据,证明在这个领域中没有研究同理心的标准方法。对研究人员和音乐教育者的启示这篇综述的新发现证实,在一个小型音乐团体的背景下促进同理心会影响学生的社交和情感能力。然而,对于研究同理心的标准化方法,目前还没有达成共识。这对研究者也有启示,他们不仅需要在音乐表演或音乐教育领域,还需要在其他领域对共情进行更多的研究,以缩小研究共情方法的标准化途径。此外,这篇综述是对所有音乐教育者的呼吁,通过他们的日常教育策略来实施和发展同理心。
{"title":"Empathy in group musical performance: A review of the literature","authors":"Pablo Davila‐Barrio, Cristina Arriaga, Alberto Cabedo‐Mas","doi":"10.1002/rev3.3426","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3426","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Empathy plays a fundamental role in the prosocial development of young people today as an essential skill for interacting with other human beings. Music, particularly in a small group set up, offers a fitting context for its development. This article presents a review of the different studies and investigations that examine the effects that the development of empathic capacity can produce in small group instrumental practice, the capacity of empathy to induce modifications in the final result of a small group musical interpretation, and empathy and its relationship with small group musical interpretation from the field of education. The aim of this article is to review and analyse literature on how empathy is researched in the context of small group (between 2 and 10 individuals) music performance in order to enquire if the empathic ability constitutes a basic and decisive foundation in the development of multiple actions executed jointly with other individuals. For that purpose, different aspects are analysed: (1) definition of empathy and how it is measured; (2) the instruments used for its measurement; (3) the characteristics of the participants in the studies and their level of music experience; and (4) the type of activities undertaken. The analysis of the results indicates that defining empathy in this context is an ongoing process, and the concept is measured by standardised and ad hoc tests. It also shows that the type of studies and activities are related to the discipline in which they are carried out. Notably, there is a lack of studies regarding the field of study and the age and the level of musical experience of the performers. Context and implications Rationale for this study Empathy is considered a fundamental social ability to communicate. This review aims to analyse how empathy is researched in the context of a small music group set up in order to explore the state of empathy in group music performance and its benefits of developing social and emotional abilities in music students. Why the new findings matter This review provides details of research that reports the benefits of promoting empathy in a small music group set up and presents evidence that there are no standard ways of researching empathy in this sphere. Implications for researchers and music educators The emerging findings of this review affirm that promoting empathy in the context of a small music group set up affects students' social and emotional abilities. However, there is still no consensus of a standardised way to research empathy. The implications extend to researchers, who need to do more investigations on empathy not only in the sphere of music performance or music education but also in other spheres in order to narrow a way of standardising methods to research empathy. Moreover, this review is a call for all music educators, to implement and develop empathy through their daily educational strategies.","PeriodicalId":45076,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135864603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What do the children and teachers say?: Voices on gender stereotyping in children's literature for Malaysian ESL classrooms 孩子们和老师们怎么说?:马来西亚ESL课堂儿童文学中的性别刻板印象
Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI: 10.1002/rev3.3427
Hai Nin Yeoh, Huey Fen Cheong
Abstract This preliminary study analyses children's and teachers' views towards gender stereotyping in children's literature for Malaysian ESL (English as a Second Language) classrooms. We employed focus groups with 14 children (aged 10–12) and interviews with 6 experienced ESL teachers, in which children and teachers reflected on selected literature taught in schools. Our findings suggested that both children and teachers overlooked gender stereotyping in the selected children's literature as they focused more on the storyline and moral values. However, our focus groups with children showed their potential in adapting the reading materials to their social context, despite the typical belief that young children blindly learn and accept anything presented to them. Comparison between the boys and girls also showed different gendered responses towards gender stereotyping, with the boys showing stronger support for gender equality. The children insisted that men and women are equals and suggested more active male participation in domestic settings could indicate their readiness to discuss gender‐related issues. In addition, our interviews with teachers led to their call for more reading materials that reflect gender equality. The teachers admitted to a lack of explicit discussions about gender in their current teaching/learning process and expressed their willingness to include gender discussions with their students in the future. This study hopes to give voices to Malaysian children and teachers in the Global South, highlighting their potential for agency in pedagogical review and gender advocacy in education. Context and implications Rationale for this study This study explores children's views' and teachers' strategies for addressing gender stereotyping in children's literature for Malaysian ESL classrooms. Why the new findings matter Our findings highlight the need for training for teachers and teaching/learning materials that reflect gender equality. Our findings signal children's readiness to discuss gender and the importance of teachers' role in fostering such discussions. Implications for practitioners and policy makers This study is significant for teachers and curriculum reviewers in highlighting how children's literature may influence children and foster gender equality. There is a need for support materials, training for teachers and careful selection of suitable reading materials for children in terms of cultural and gender values.
摘要本初步研究分析了马来西亚ESL(英语作为第二语言)课堂上儿童和教师对儿童文学中性别刻板印象的看法。我们采用了14名儿童(10-12岁)的焦点小组,并采访了6名经验丰富的ESL教师,在访谈中,儿童和教师对学校教授的精选文学进行了反思。我们的研究结果表明,孩子和老师都忽略了所选儿童文学作品中的性别刻板印象,因为他们更关注故事情节和道德价值观。然而,我们的儿童焦点小组显示出他们在将阅读材料适应他们的社会背景方面的潜力,尽管人们通常认为幼儿盲目地学习和接受呈现给他们的任何东西。男孩和女孩之间的对比也显示出不同的性别对性别刻板印象的反应,男孩对性别平等的支持更强。孩子们坚持男女平等,并建议男性更积极地参与家庭环境,以表明他们愿意讨论与性别有关的问题。此外,我们对教师的采访让他们呼吁更多反映性别平等的阅读材料。教师们承认在目前的教学过程中缺乏关于性别的明确讨论,并表示愿意在未来与学生进行性别讨论。这项研究希望为全球南方的马来西亚儿童和教师发声,强调他们在教学审查和教育中的性别倡导方面的潜力。本研究探讨马来西亚ESL课堂中儿童文学中性别刻板印象问题的儿童观点和教师策略。我们的研究结果强调,需要对教师进行培训,编写反映性别平等的教学/学习材料。我们的研究结果表明,孩子们愿意讨论性别问题,教师在促进这种讨论中的作用也很重要。本研究对教师和课程审稿人在强调儿童文学如何影响儿童和促进性别平等方面具有重要意义。需要提供辅助材料,培训教师,并根据文化和性别价值为儿童仔细选择合适的阅读材料。
{"title":"What do the children and teachers say?: Voices on gender stereotyping in children's literature for Malaysian <scp>ESL</scp> classrooms","authors":"Hai Nin Yeoh, Huey Fen Cheong","doi":"10.1002/rev3.3427","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3427","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This preliminary study analyses children's and teachers' views towards gender stereotyping in children's literature for Malaysian ESL (English as a Second Language) classrooms. We employed focus groups with 14 children (aged 10–12) and interviews with 6 experienced ESL teachers, in which children and teachers reflected on selected literature taught in schools. Our findings suggested that both children and teachers overlooked gender stereotyping in the selected children's literature as they focused more on the storyline and moral values. However, our focus groups with children showed their potential in adapting the reading materials to their social context, despite the typical belief that young children blindly learn and accept anything presented to them. Comparison between the boys and girls also showed different gendered responses towards gender stereotyping, with the boys showing stronger support for gender equality. The children insisted that men and women are equals and suggested more active male participation in domestic settings could indicate their readiness to discuss gender‐related issues. In addition, our interviews with teachers led to their call for more reading materials that reflect gender equality. The teachers admitted to a lack of explicit discussions about gender in their current teaching/learning process and expressed their willingness to include gender discussions with their students in the future. This study hopes to give voices to Malaysian children and teachers in the Global South, highlighting their potential for agency in pedagogical review and gender advocacy in education. Context and implications Rationale for this study This study explores children's views' and teachers' strategies for addressing gender stereotyping in children's literature for Malaysian ESL classrooms. Why the new findings matter Our findings highlight the need for training for teachers and teaching/learning materials that reflect gender equality. Our findings signal children's readiness to discuss gender and the importance of teachers' role in fostering such discussions. Implications for practitioners and policy makers This study is significant for teachers and curriculum reviewers in highlighting how children's literature may influence children and foster gender equality. There is a need for support materials, training for teachers and careful selection of suitable reading materials for children in terms of cultural and gender values.","PeriodicalId":45076,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135817452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Review of Education
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1