International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing最新文献

Introduction

Patients undergoing major lower limb amputation often have multiple comorbidities, requiring care from numerous healthcare professionals (HCPs). Furthermore, they may experience physical, medical and practical challenges post-amputation. Patients with complex needs are particularly vulnerable during care transitions and may benefit from integrated care models.

Aim

This study aimed to explore HCPs’ views and experiences regarding the transition process after implementing an integrated care model for patients with lower limb amputation.

Methods

We conducted two focus groups with 13 HCPs from a Danish hospital and three surrounding districts; all working in the Safe Journey programme. The interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

Three themes were created: 1) becoming a team across sectors, 2) continuity of care as a driver for patient safety and 3) challenges in achieving safe transitions. The Safe Journey programme facilitated the construction of an interdisciplinary team, cross-sectoral communication and professional relations, increasing HCPs’ sense of improved patient safety and care continuity. However, HCPs experienced an increased workload, including coordination and at-home patient visits.

Conclusions

HCPs found the Safe Journey programme to be valuable for patients undergoing major lower limb amputation and promotive of cross-sectoral professional relations, communication, continuity and patient safety. However, the programme was time- and resource-consuming compared to conventional models.

Background

Research has shown that models of care involving geriatric care in orthopedics decrease hospitalizations, mortality, length of stay and post-operative complications. This article presents an example of a nurse practitioner-led orthogeriatric model of care in a large academic hospital in Ontario. The overall goal was to explore staff perspectives regarding the nurse practitioner-led orthogeriatric model of care.

Methods

We conducted a mixed methods approach consisting of an online questionnaire, semi-structured interviews, and a focus group with staff.

Results

Questionnaire of staff showed overall support for functions of the NP within the model. Interviews with healthcare providers, and leadership as well as one focus group with orthopedic surgeons showed that despite the lack of formal awareness of the NP-led orthogeriatric model of care, staff felt that the model provided better care for the geriatric hip fracture population.

Conclusion

In the current context of geriatricians’ shortages to provide post-surgical care to geriatric patients, the staff described that geriatric care of hip fracture patients can be well accomplished by a NP. Further improvement efforts to create better awareness of the NP-led orthogeriatric model among the care team is needed.

Having a visible physical difference, such as a limb difference, can have a significant impact on a child's psychosocial development, as children with limb differences may experience negative psychosocial sequelae. The aim of this scoping review was to investigate the findings of literature pertaining to self-concept of children with limb differences. Using the PRISMA ScR guidelines, a literature search was conducted in Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and PubMed databases. Nine articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Two studies focused on evaluating self-concept, whereas the remaining seven studies focused on associated constructs of self-concept (i.e., self-perception and self-esteem). The findings of these studies indicated that the social environment directly impacted the development of psychopathology and self-concept in children with limb differences. This review demonstrated a need for a gold standard instrument with which to assess children's self-concept.

Clinical relevance

Level IV: Evidence derived from guidelines developed from a systematic review of existing qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research studies.

Objective

Identifying factors affecting decision-making for knee arthroplasty in patients with knee osteoarthritis is critically important for pain relief, improving in knee function and reaching an optimal outcome. When decision-making is hurried or delayed, surgery may not occur in time, which complicates the surgery and increases its complications. This study was conducted to investigate the factors influencing decision-making for knee arthroplasty.

Methods

This study is a qualitative study and inductive content analysis method. This study enrolled 22 patients undergoing knee arthroplasty selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews and analyzed using inductive content analysis.

Results

Data analysis yielded three categories: hope to return to normal life, encouragement and recommendations, and trust and assurance.

Conclusion

To make better treatment-related decisions and achieve better outcomes based on the patient's values and wishes, it is necessary for the treatment team to increase its interactions and establish stronger communication with patients to make their expectations more realistic and help them understand the risks. They should also make efforts to increase patients' knowledge about the advantages and disadvantages of surgery and clarify what is important to them in decision-making.

Background

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee is associated with extended hospital stay, high doses of antibiotics, lengthy rehabilitation, and pain. Standard treatment is a two-stage procedure comprising two surgeries and two hospitalizations. To facilitate exploration of patients’ perspectives, the qualitative study presented here was an adjunct to a Danish randomized controlled trial comparing one-stage and two-stage revision surgery.

Aim

To explore patient experiences, before, during and after hospitalization and surgical treatment with one- or two-stage revision for PJI of the knee.

Material and methods

Qualitative, semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 10 individuals who had undergone either one- or two-stage revision because of PJI. Thematic analysis was employed.

Results

The essence of the findings was that the infection was a transition point in a possible life-changing illness. The three themes representing this comprised: 1) physical, 2) psychological, and 3) social implications. Each theme is further illuminated with subthemes.

Conclusions

Infection is a transition point in a possible life changing illness. Late diagnosis and delayed treatment are major issues. Individuals suffer from pain, weight loss, fatigue, and reduced mobility as well as dependency on family members, leading to psychological challenges including depression.

Implications for clinical practice

Patients with PJI of the knee could be better informed, educated and involved before and during treatment. Information is needed not only about the physical consequences, but also the psychological and social consequences. More patient involvement and inter-professional and care sector coordination is important when caring for patients with PJI.

Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is an underrecognized healthcare phenomenon that causes significant harm to the health of those affected. The lifetime estimated global prevalence of IPV is one in three for women and one in twelve for men. Orthopaedic fracture clinics care for patients affected by IPV and, in fact, orthopaedic patients themselves believe they should be screened for IPV. Almost three percent of women seen for an acute musculoskeletal injury is a direct consequence of IPV. A major concern is that, in the absence of screening and no outward signs of IPV, healthcare providers do not screen patients. Current screening practices and policies are influenced by the nurses’ practice or the organizational structure in which nurses work. The purpose of this article is to raise awareness of IPV in the orthopaedic patient population and to provide a review on IPV for orthopaedic nurses.

It is important for organizational leaders to recognize the relationship between the barriers and facilitators in relation to IPV intervention. Facilitators and barriers to addressing IPV are discussed. In addition, the need to implement change in practice combined with empowering nurses to address IPV is described. Empowering orthopaedic nurses necessarily involves the provision of appropriate resources, information, and support to overcome barriers. The authors discuss unit policies, guidelines, and resources to address IPV.