Pub Date : 2023-11-15DOI: 10.1080/17447143.2023.2281673
Muireann Prendergast
Socio-political transitions prompt shifts in public sphere discourses on key issues (Krzyżanowski, Michał, Anna Triandafyllidou, and Ruth Wodak. 2009. ‘Introduction’ in the European Public Sphere a...
社会政治转型促使公共领域在关键问题上的话语发生转变(Krzyżanowski, michaov, Anna Triandafyllidou和Ruth Wodak, 2009)。欧洲公共领域的“导论”
{"title":"Constructing the abortion debate: a comparative news values analysis of print media discourses in Ireland and Argentina","authors":"Muireann Prendergast","doi":"10.1080/17447143.2023.2281673","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2023.2281673","url":null,"abstract":"Socio-political transitions prompt shifts in public sphere discourses on key issues (Krzyżanowski, Michał, Anna Triandafyllidou, and Ruth Wodak. 2009. ‘Introduction’ in the European Public Sphere a...","PeriodicalId":45223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","volume":"30 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138525314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01DOI: 10.1080/17447143.2023.2260360
Bradford J. Hall
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsBradford J. HallBradford J. Hall is a Full Professor in the Department of Communication Studies and Philosophy and Utah State University. His research deals with issues of culture, identity, membership, memory, conflict and everyday conversation. His work has been published in journals such as, Communication Monographs, Research on Language and Social Interaction, Communication Theory, Human Relations, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, and Human Communication Research. Along with his co-authors, Patricia Covarrubias and Kris Kirschbaum, he recently published the fourth edition of his text Among Cultures: The Challenge of Communication (2022).
点击放大图片点击缩小图片披露声明作者未发现潜在的利益冲突。本文作者bradford J. Hall是犹他州立大学传播研究和哲学系的正教授。他的研究涉及文化、身份、成员、记忆、冲突和日常对话等问题。他的研究成果发表在《传播专著》、《语言与社会互动研究》、《传播理论》、《人际关系》、《国际跨文化关系杂志》、《人类传播研究》等期刊上。最近，他与合著者帕特里夏·科瓦鲁比亚斯和克里斯·克什鲍姆共同出版了他的著作《文化之间:沟通的挑战》(2022)的第四版。
{"title":"Seeing the unseen: the role of language choices in organizing","authors":"Bradford J. Hall","doi":"10.1080/17447143.2023.2260360","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2023.2260360","url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsBradford J. HallBradford J. Hall is a Full Professor in the Department of Communication Studies and Philosophy and Utah State University. His research deals with issues of culture, identity, membership, memory, conflict and everyday conversation. His work has been published in journals such as, Communication Monographs, Research on Language and Social Interaction, Communication Theory, Human Relations, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, and Human Communication Research. Along with his co-authors, Patricia Covarrubias and Kris Kirschbaum, he recently published the fourth edition of his text Among Cultures: The Challenge of Communication (2022).","PeriodicalId":45223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135458566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-22DOI: 10.1080/17447143.2023.2244930
Arne van Lienden, Jacco van Sterkenburg, Mélodine Sommier
{"title":"Meanings given to race/ethnicity in everyday football talk by young adult Polish audiences: a reception study","authors":"Arne van Lienden, Jacco van Sterkenburg, Mélodine Sommier","doi":"10.1080/17447143.2023.2244930","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2023.2244930","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41413810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-03DOI: 10.1080/17447143.2023.2242330
Jésica Franco
{"title":"Thinking and doing otherwise in the academy: drawing lessons from the Global South","authors":"Jésica Franco","doi":"10.1080/17447143.2023.2242330","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2023.2242330","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42244965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-15DOI: 10.1080/17447143.2023.2166055
Eric Karikari
{"title":"Conceptualizing organization: hybridity and the naturalizing of dis/order","authors":"Eric Karikari","doi":"10.1080/17447143.2023.2166055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2023.2166055","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48644755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/17447143.2023.2204839
Shi-xu
Cultural Discourse Studies (CDS), to which this journal is devoted, concerns itself with human communication, like Communication Studies (CS) in general. That is, it takes as its object of study the social interaction in which people use language and other mediums in context, purposefully and consequentially. In this view, communication is a social process which encompasses multiple elements and dimensions (e.g. language, gesture, technology, channels, time and place). As such, communication functionally constructs reality, exercises power and changes the world. And yet, different from many common forms in CS, CDS considers communication not as universal or culturally neutral, but as a global system composed of culturally diversified and competing discourses. Here discourse refers to the cultural form of communication, real or potential, of an ethnically and geopolitically characterized community (say the Chinese/ Asian/Developing/Third World, the/Western/Developed World). Culture in this context refers to the particular ways of thinking, speaking and acting, often involving concepts, norms, values, rules, language, ethnicity, religion, traditions, as well as material artefacts, that are embodied in the discursive practice of a community. Thus, culture is the defining feature of a discourse – hence cultural discourse – and of communication more generally; to study discourse and communication, then, is also to study culture. Any cultural discourse as such has its own system – discourse system. By this is meant the underlying, constitutive configuration of (a) communicative institutions (community, organization, platforms, media technology, etc. – ‘the motor system’) and (b) communicative knowhow (concepts, values, theory, information, principles, tactics, etc. – ‘the nervous system’) which combine to enable, organize and sustain a community’s discursive practice at different levels of abstraction and fields of action. It is the discursive competence of a given community and can have a profound impact on the outcome of its communicative practice. However, it should be stressed that cultural discourses are not to be taken essentialistically, as if they were homogeneous, reified or fixed. Rather, they should be understood in differential, dialectic and dynamic terms: they have dissimilarities both within and without, they are interdependent, and they are subject to change. More importantly perhaps, they are not equal to one another but must be seen in power terms: they interact with one another and consequently relations of domination, exclusion, resistance, cooperation, etc. saturate the process. For practical research purposes, CDS categorizes cultural discourse into six interlocking components, they are: Communicators, Act, Medium, Purpose, History and Culture (CAMPHAC). Specifically, Communicators imply: discursive actors as cultural organizations and members, for investigating who is (not) speaking and acting, in what position and capacity and w
{"title":"Cultural Discourse Studies as culturalist approach to communication: object, objectives and tasks","authors":"Shi-xu","doi":"10.1080/17447143.2023.2204839","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2023.2204839","url":null,"abstract":"Cultural Discourse Studies (CDS), to which this journal is devoted, concerns itself with human communication, like Communication Studies (CS) in general. That is, it takes as its object of study the social interaction in which people use language and other mediums in context, purposefully and consequentially. In this view, communication is a social process which encompasses multiple elements and dimensions (e.g. language, gesture, technology, channels, time and place). As such, communication functionally constructs reality, exercises power and changes the world. And yet, different from many common forms in CS, CDS considers communication not as universal or culturally neutral, but as a global system composed of culturally diversified and competing discourses. Here discourse refers to the cultural form of communication, real or potential, of an ethnically and geopolitically characterized community (say the Chinese/ Asian/Developing/Third World, the/Western/Developed World). Culture in this context refers to the particular ways of thinking, speaking and acting, often involving concepts, norms, values, rules, language, ethnicity, religion, traditions, as well as material artefacts, that are embodied in the discursive practice of a community. Thus, culture is the defining feature of a discourse – hence cultural discourse – and of communication more generally; to study discourse and communication, then, is also to study culture. Any cultural discourse as such has its own system – discourse system. By this is meant the underlying, constitutive configuration of (a) communicative institutions (community, organization, platforms, media technology, etc. – ‘the motor system’) and (b) communicative knowhow (concepts, values, theory, information, principles, tactics, etc. – ‘the nervous system’) which combine to enable, organize and sustain a community’s discursive practice at different levels of abstraction and fields of action. It is the discursive competence of a given community and can have a profound impact on the outcome of its communicative practice. However, it should be stressed that cultural discourses are not to be taken essentialistically, as if they were homogeneous, reified or fixed. Rather, they should be understood in differential, dialectic and dynamic terms: they have dissimilarities both within and without, they are interdependent, and they are subject to change. More importantly perhaps, they are not equal to one another but must be seen in power terms: they interact with one another and consequently relations of domination, exclusion, resistance, cooperation, etc. saturate the process. For practical research purposes, CDS categorizes cultural discourse into six interlocking components, they are: Communicators, Act, Medium, Purpose, History and Culture (CAMPHAC). Specifically, Communicators imply: discursive actors as cultural organizations and members, for investigating who is (not) speaking and acting, in what position and capacity and w","PeriodicalId":45223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","volume":"18 1","pages":"1 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42344462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/17447143.2023.2210098
S. Sugiharto
ABSTRACT The idea of unequal Englishes has of late been proposed with vim and vigor to unravel the presence of the unequal spread of the nativized variants of Englishes, especially in Kachurian Outer and Expanding circles. The notion envisions the possibility that any emerging varieties of Englishes in these circles are considered more legitimate than any other emerging variants and are therefore valorized. By contrast, there is also the possibility that certain variants are considered less legitimate, making them stigmatized and demoted to a lower status. This results in unequal Englishes. I argue in this article that the notion of unequal Englishes (a) overlooks the mundanity of vibrant multilingual practices in a certain locus of enunciation, which thus renders the term ‘unequal’ dubious, (b) still succumbs to the idea of structural inequalities within a regional linguistic context and (c) undermines the performative potentials of individual language speakers to construct their own versions of Englishes. By illustrating instances of the everydayness of linguistic practices in several life domains from a specific locus of enunciation (i.e. multilingual and multicultural Indonesia), the article proposes the notion of ‘the praxis of decolonial fissure’ (Walsh 2018), which depicts the grassroot performativity.
{"title":"From unequal Englishes to the praxis of decolonial fissure: Englishes in the Indonesian periphery","authors":"S. Sugiharto","doi":"10.1080/17447143.2023.2210098","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2023.2210098","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The idea of unequal Englishes has of late been proposed with vim and vigor to unravel the presence of the unequal spread of the nativized variants of Englishes, especially in Kachurian Outer and Expanding circles. The notion envisions the possibility that any emerging varieties of Englishes in these circles are considered more legitimate than any other emerging variants and are therefore valorized. By contrast, there is also the possibility that certain variants are considered less legitimate, making them stigmatized and demoted to a lower status. This results in unequal Englishes. I argue in this article that the notion of unequal Englishes (a) overlooks the mundanity of vibrant multilingual practices in a certain locus of enunciation, which thus renders the term ‘unequal’ dubious, (b) still succumbs to the idea of structural inequalities within a regional linguistic context and (c) undermines the performative potentials of individual language speakers to construct their own versions of Englishes. By illustrating instances of the everydayness of linguistic practices in several life domains from a specific locus of enunciation (i.e. multilingual and multicultural Indonesia), the article proposes the notion of ‘the praxis of decolonial fissure’ (Walsh 2018), which depicts the grassroot performativity.","PeriodicalId":45223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","volume":"18 1","pages":"33 - 44"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44040624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/17447143.2023.2220689
Jesús Romero-Trillo, Irina N. Rozina
ABSTRACT The present article compares the conceptualisation of the Spanish term justicia and the Russian spravedlivost’ with the English justice to determine the contextual uses and specific cultural features of the concept. The data used in the study is taken from three online corpora – British National Corpus, Corpus de Referencia del Español Actual (CREA), and Russian National Corpus. The investigation proposes the explications of the concept within the Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) framework as it offers an effective tool to decompose and specify the linguistic features reflected in the selected languages. The results of the study reveal the main differences and similarities between the three languages and, in sum, prove the relevance of culture-specific semantic analysis of abstract concepts and the use of NSM as a useful tool in cross-cultural studies.
{"title":"Is there justice in this world? A cross-cultural pragmatic analysis of the conceptualisation of ‘justice’","authors":"Jesús Romero-Trillo, Irina N. Rozina","doi":"10.1080/17447143.2023.2220689","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2023.2220689","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The present article compares the conceptualisation of the Spanish term justicia and the Russian spravedlivost’ with the English justice to determine the contextual uses and specific cultural features of the concept. The data used in the study is taken from three online corpora – British National Corpus, Corpus de Referencia del Español Actual (CREA), and Russian National Corpus. The investigation proposes the explications of the concept within the Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) framework as it offers an effective tool to decompose and specify the linguistic features reflected in the selected languages. The results of the study reveal the main differences and similarities between the three languages and, in sum, prove the relevance of culture-specific semantic analysis of abstract concepts and the use of NSM as a useful tool in cross-cultural studies.","PeriodicalId":45223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","volume":"18 1","pages":"62 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49329556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/17447143.2023.2180007
Yao Wang, Miaomiao Zuo
{"title":"Reexamining the meaning of ‘space’ in the discourse of globalization and its implications for cultural discourse studies","authors":"Yao Wang, Miaomiao Zuo","doi":"10.1080/17447143.2023.2180007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2023.2180007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","volume":"18 1","pages":"87 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47982006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/17447143.2023.2234888
R. W. Greene, Zornitsa D. Keremidchieva
ABSTRACT The proliferation of models of diversity governance signals not just persistent unease with diversity itself, but also a trend toward increasingly intensive investments in governance and governmentality across political, social, and media platforms. And, following Sara Ahmed (2012), we are cognizant that the institutionalization of diversity may reinforce as much as it may disrupt whiteness. In our response, therefore, we first consider Elias and Mansouri’s proposals in the context of diversity governance as a political project. In a second step, we explore how cultural difference is expressed in Elias and Mansouri’s idea of intercultural engagement. Third, we bring into better focus how communication is envisioned and deployed, activated and delimited in the interculturalism model that the authors promote. Ultimately, we argue that at the heart of intercultural understanding is a peculiar bundling of culture and communication that targets the interactional order of human relationality in ways consistent with a liberal social order reproducing its social inequities more than challenging them.
{"title":"Governing superdiversity: a critical commentary on intercultural understanding","authors":"R. W. Greene, Zornitsa D. Keremidchieva","doi":"10.1080/17447143.2023.2234888","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2023.2234888","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The proliferation of models of diversity governance signals not just persistent unease with diversity itself, but also a trend toward increasingly intensive investments in governance and governmentality across political, social, and media platforms. And, following Sara Ahmed (2012), we are cognizant that the institutionalization of diversity may reinforce as much as it may disrupt whiteness. In our response, therefore, we first consider Elias and Mansouri’s proposals in the context of diversity governance as a political project. In a second step, we explore how cultural difference is expressed in Elias and Mansouri’s idea of intercultural engagement. Third, we bring into better focus how communication is envisioned and deployed, activated and delimited in the interculturalism model that the authors promote. Ultimately, we argue that at the heart of intercultural understanding is a peculiar bundling of culture and communication that targets the interactional order of human relationality in ways consistent with a liberal social order reproducing its social inequities more than challenging them.","PeriodicalId":45223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","volume":"18 1","pages":"22 - 32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47790757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：