首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health最新文献

英文 中文
Factors that Influence Farm Safety Decisions of Young Adults when Entering Agricultural Grain Bins. 影响青年进入农业粮仓时农场安全决策的因素。
IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2021-07-09 DOI: 10.13031/jash.14450
Kayla N Walls, Gretchen A Mosher

HIGHLIGHTS A grain handling scenario-based survey was administered to college students studying agriculture. Participants chose an action after reading each scenario and ranked factors affecting their decision-making. Most participants chose a "safe" option and claimed to value their personal safety when making decisions. Parental authority and pressure had little influence on participants' decisions to enter grain bins. ABSTRACT. The approaches that parents take in the supervision of youth who perform hazardous tasks on family farms can affect youth safety outcomes. This research examines the most significant factors affecting youths' decisions to enter agricultural grain storage facilities. Over 200 students attending a Midwestern land-grant university who had grain bin experience as youth completed a decision-making survey. Students chose from a list of actions in three realistic but hypothetical scenarios involving grain bin entry. Afterward, they ranked factors according to the level of importance in their decision. Although most participants chose options that emphasized safety when answering the scenario questions and held the "personal safety" factor in highest regard, some chose higher-risk options and valued "productivity." The findings revealed that youth held little value in their parents' authority and pressure when making decisions related to grain bin entry. The study's limitations are addressed, as are the implications of these findings for youth safety outcomes on family farms.

对农业专业大学生进行了一项基于粮食处理场景的调查。参与者在阅读完每个场景后选择一个行动,并对影响他们决策的因素进行排序。大多数参与者选择了“安全”选项,并声称在做决定时重视个人安全。父母的权威和压力对参与者进入粮仓的决定几乎没有影响。摘要父母在监督在家庭农场从事危险任务的青年时所采取的方法会影响青年的安全结果。本研究探讨影响青少年决定进入农业粮食储存设施的最重要因素。在中西部一所赠地大学就读的200多名青年时期有过粮仓经历的学生完成了一项决策调查。学生们从三个现实但假设的场景中选择行动,包括进入粮仓。之后,他们根据决定中的重要程度对因素进行排序。虽然大多数参与者在回答情景问题时选择了强调安全的选项,并将“个人安全”因素放在首位,但有些人选择了风险更高的选项,并重视“生产力”。研究结果显示,在决定是否进入粮仓时,年轻人不太看重父母的权威和压力。该研究的局限性得到了解决,这些发现对家庭农场青年安全结果的影响也得到了解决。
{"title":"Factors that Influence Farm Safety Decisions of Young Adults when Entering Agricultural Grain Bins.","authors":"Kayla N Walls,&nbsp;Gretchen A Mosher","doi":"10.13031/jash.14450","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.14450","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>HIGHLIGHTS A grain handling scenario-based survey was administered to college students studying agriculture. Participants chose an action after reading each scenario and ranked factors affecting their decision-making. Most participants chose a \"safe\" option and claimed to value their personal safety when making decisions. Parental authority and pressure had little influence on participants' decisions to enter grain bins. ABSTRACT. The approaches that parents take in the supervision of youth who perform hazardous tasks on family farms can affect youth safety outcomes. This research examines the most significant factors affecting youths' decisions to enter agricultural grain storage facilities. Over 200 students attending a Midwestern land-grant university who had grain bin experience as youth completed a decision-making survey. Students chose from a list of actions in three realistic but hypothetical scenarios involving grain bin entry. Afterward, they ranked factors according to the level of importance in their decision. Although most participants chose options that emphasized safety when answering the scenario questions and held the \"personal safety\" factor in highest regard, some chose higher-risk options and valued \"productivity.\" The findings revealed that youth held little value in their parents' authority and pressure when making decisions related to grain bin entry. The study's limitations are addressed, as are the implications of these findings for youth safety outcomes on family farms.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"27 3","pages":"147-158"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464884/pdf/nihms-1924282.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10449805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Comparing Objective and Subjective Measures of Sleep Loss with Balance Performance in Farmers. 比较农民睡眠损失与平衡表现的客观与主观测量。
IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2021-04-23 DOI: 10.13031/jash.14217
Devan Sedlacek, Matthew Beacom, Sabin R Bista, Risto Rautiainen, Ka-Chun Siu

HIGHLIGHTS The farming population is at risk of injury due to sleep deprivation. Loss of sleep during previous night affects balance performance in farmers. Objective measures of sleep are more reliable than subjective measures for predicting balance performance. ABSTRACT. This study aimed to investigate the ability of both subjective and objective sleep measures to predict balance difficulty in agricultural workers. Seven male farmers from rural Nebraska were analyzed for static balance performance following a bout of sleep. Actiwatches were used to measure objective sleep hours and subjective questionnaires, including the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, were used to measure subjective hours of sleep and sleep quality. The participants were observed for 12 sessions, with six in planting season and six in harvest season. Static balance testing consisted of measuring the area, total displacement, and maximum range in the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions of the individual's center of pressure with Tekscan pressure mats. Overall, it was found that objective measures had a higher correlation with the magnitude of balance deviations than subjective measures.

由于睡眠不足,农业人口面临受伤的风险。前一晚睡眠不足会影响农民的平衡能力。在预测平衡表现方面,客观的睡眠测量比主观的测量更可靠。摘要本研究旨在探讨主观和客观睡眠测量对农业工人平衡困难的预测能力。对来自内布拉斯加州农村的7名男性农民在睡眠后的静态平衡表现进行了分析。使用活动手表测量客观睡眠时间,使用主观问卷(包括Epworth嗜睡量表和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数)测量主观睡眠时间和睡眠质量。参与者被观察了12次,其中6次在种植季节,6次在收获季节。静平衡测试包括使用Tekscan压力垫测量个体压力中心的前后和中外侧方向的面积、总位移和最大范围。总的来说,我们发现客观测量比主观测量与平衡偏差的大小有更高的相关性。
{"title":"Comparing Objective and Subjective Measures of Sleep Loss with Balance Performance in Farmers.","authors":"Devan Sedlacek,&nbsp;Matthew Beacom,&nbsp;Sabin R Bista,&nbsp;Risto Rautiainen,&nbsp;Ka-Chun Siu","doi":"10.13031/jash.14217","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.14217","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>HIGHLIGHTS The farming population is at risk of injury due to sleep deprivation. Loss of sleep during previous night affects balance performance in farmers. Objective measures of sleep are more reliable than subjective measures for predicting balance performance. ABSTRACT. This study aimed to investigate the ability of both subjective and objective sleep measures to predict balance difficulty in agricultural workers. Seven male farmers from rural Nebraska were analyzed for static balance performance following a bout of sleep. Actiwatches were used to measure objective sleep hours and subjective questionnaires, including the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, were used to measure subjective hours of sleep and sleep quality. The participants were observed for 12 sessions, with six in planting season and six in harvest season. Static balance testing consisted of measuring the area, total displacement, and maximum range in the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions of the individual's center of pressure with Tekscan pressure mats. Overall, it was found that objective measures had a higher correlation with the magnitude of balance deviations than subjective measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"27 2","pages":"69-76"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10770121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Summary of Injuries and Fatalities Involving Livestock Manure Storage, Handling, and Transport Operations in Seven Central States: 1976-2019. 1976-2019年中部七个邦涉及牲畜粪便储存、处理和运输业务的伤亡总结
IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2021-04-23 DOI: 10.13031/jash.14343
Mahmoud M Nour, Yuan-Hsin Cheng, Ji-Qin Ni, Ed Sheldon, William E Field

HIGHLIGHTS A total of 133 cases were documented in a seven-state region, with Iowa reporting 43% of the cases and asphyxiations accounting for 42% of all cases. Most victims were male (>79%) with an average age of 38 years. The overall fatality rate was 57%, and 16% of the victims were under the age of 21. Thirteen incidents involved secondary victims, including eleven incidents involving two, one incident involving three, and one incident involving four. ABSTRACT. Research was conducted to document, classify, analyze, and summarize available injury and fatality data involving facilities and equipment for livestock manure storage, handling, and transport in the seven-state region (Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota) served by the Central States Center for Agricultural Safety and Health (CS-CASH). Data were initially drawn from the Purdue Agricultural Confined Space Incident Database (PACSID), which contained over 2,400 individual U.S. cases of agricultural confined space related entrapment, engulfment, entanglement, asphyxiation, and falls that were documented between 1975 and 2019. Data from these cases have been partially summarized and published, but the findings did not include in-depth analysis of manure-related incidents. Approximately one in five (460) of the 2,400+ cases that were documented over 44 years involved storage, handling, or transport of livestock wastes, including exposure to toxic gases. Of these, 133 cases were documented as having occurred in the targeted seven-state region. Each case was identified and coded according to a protocol developed previously to classify incidents related to livestock manure handling, storage, and transport. Iowa and Minnesota accounted for 79% of the total, with swine operations accounting for 33% of cases when livestock type was known. Of the victims, 79% were male. Ages ranged from 1 to 85, with an average age of 38, and 15% of the victims were age 21 and under. There were 13 incidents for which two or more victims were identified, including one incident involving four victims. It is believed that historical under-reporting of incidents, especially non-fatal incidents, continues to be a barrier to achieving a more comprehensive understanding of the scope and magnitude of the problem. However, the findings are sufficient to be used in cooperation with stakeholders to enhance the content and delivery of evidence-based agricultural safety and health programs, promote safer work practices, and contribute to the development of engineering design standards. The desired outcomes of this research include more effective strategies to protect farmers and farm workers who are at high risk of manure-related injuries. The findings also provide a sufficient baseline to gauge the effectiveness of future injury prevention measures.

在7个州共记录了133例病例,爱荷华州报告了43%的病例,窒息占所有病例的42%。大多数受害者为男性(>79%),平均年龄为38岁。总死亡率为57%,其中16%的受害者年龄在21岁以下。13起事件涉及次要受害者,其中11起事件涉及2人,1起事件涉及3人,1起事件涉及4人。摘要在中央州农业安全与卫生中心(CS-CASH)服务的七个州地区(爱荷华州、堪萨斯州、明尼苏达州、密苏里州、内布拉斯加州、北达科他州和南达科他州),开展了一项研究,以记录、分类、分析和总结涉及牲畜粪便储存、处理和运输设施和设备的现有伤害和死亡数据。数据最初来自普渡大学农业密闭空间事件数据库(PACSID),该数据库包含了1975年至2019年期间记录的2400多起美国农业密闭空间相关的捕获、吞没、缠绕、窒息和跌倒案例。这些案例的数据已部分总结和发表,但调查结果不包括对粪便相关事件的深入分析。44年来记录的2400多起案件中,约有五分之一(460起)涉及牲畜废物的储存、处理或运输,包括接触有毒气体。其中,有记录的133例发生在目标的七个州地区。每个病例都是根据先前制定的一项协议进行识别和编码的,该协议旨在对与牲畜粪便处理、储存和运输有关的事件进行分类。爱荷华州和明尼苏达州占总数的79%,当牲畜类型已知时,养猪场占33%。在受害者中,79%是男性。年龄从1岁到85岁不等,平均年龄38岁,15%的受害者年龄在21岁及以下。查明两名或两名以上受害者的事件有13起,其中一起事件涉及四名受害者。人们认为,历史上对事件,特别是非致命事件的报告不足,仍然是对这一问题的范围和严重程度取得更全面了解的障碍。然而,研究结果足以用于与利益相关者合作,以加强以证据为基础的农业安全和健康项目的内容和交付,促进更安全的工作实践,并有助于工程设计标准的制定。这项研究的预期结果包括更有效的策略,以保护处于粪便相关伤害高风险中的农民和农场工人。研究结果还提供了一个足够的基线来衡量未来伤害预防措施的有效性。
{"title":"Summary of Injuries and Fatalities Involving Livestock Manure Storage, Handling, and Transport Operations in Seven Central States: 1976-2019.","authors":"Mahmoud M Nour,&nbsp;Yuan-Hsin Cheng,&nbsp;Ji-Qin Ni,&nbsp;Ed Sheldon,&nbsp;William E Field","doi":"10.13031/jash.14343","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.14343","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>HIGHLIGHTS A total of 133 cases were documented in a seven-state region, with Iowa reporting 43% of the cases and asphyxiations accounting for 42% of all cases. Most victims were male (>79%) with an average age of 38 years. The overall fatality rate was 57%, and 16% of the victims were under the age of 21. Thirteen incidents involved secondary victims, including eleven incidents involving two, one incident involving three, and one incident involving four. ABSTRACT. Research was conducted to document, classify, analyze, and summarize available injury and fatality data involving facilities and equipment for livestock manure storage, handling, and transport in the seven-state region (Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota) served by the Central States Center for Agricultural Safety and Health (CS-CASH). Data were initially drawn from the Purdue Agricultural Confined Space Incident Database (PACSID), which contained over 2,400 individual U.S. cases of agricultural confined space related entrapment, engulfment, entanglement, asphyxiation, and falls that were documented between 1975 and 2019. Data from these cases have been partially summarized and published, but the findings did not include in-depth analysis of manure-related incidents. Approximately one in five (460) of the 2,400+ cases that were documented over 44 years involved storage, handling, or transport of livestock wastes, including exposure to toxic gases. Of these, 133 cases were documented as having occurred in the targeted seven-state region. Each case was identified and coded according to a protocol developed previously to classify incidents related to livestock manure handling, storage, and transport. Iowa and Minnesota accounted for 79% of the total, with swine operations accounting for 33% of cases when livestock type was known. Of the victims, 79% were male. Ages ranged from 1 to 85, with an average age of 38, and 15% of the victims were age 21 and under. There were 13 incidents for which two or more victims were identified, including one incident involving four victims. It is believed that historical under-reporting of incidents, especially non-fatal incidents, continues to be a barrier to achieving a more comprehensive understanding of the scope and magnitude of the problem. However, the findings are sufficient to be used in cooperation with stakeholders to enhance the content and delivery of evidence-based agricultural safety and health programs, promote safer work practices, and contribute to the development of engineering design standards. The desired outcomes of this research include more effective strategies to protect farmers and farm workers who are at high risk of manure-related injuries. The findings also provide a sufficient baseline to gauge the effectiveness of future injury prevention measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"27 2","pages":"105-122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10775708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Agricultural Safety and Health Learning Methods for Agricultural Workforces. 农业劳动力农业安全与健康学习方法。
IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2021-04-23 DOI: 10.13031/jash.14355
Serap Gorucu, Linda Fetzer

HIGHLIGHTS Demonstrations and one-on-one training were the most preferred learning methods. The most-used learning methods were electronic methods. Printed materials were preferred and perceived as effective by Baby Boomers. ABSTRACT. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences among generational cohorts in the agricultural workforce in learning methods, including frequency of use, perceived effectiveness, and preference. A total of 211 participants representing the agricultural workforce completed either a paper-based or online questionnaire. Generational cohorts were determined using participants' birth years. The results show that regardless of the generational cohort, demonstrations and one-on-one training were the most preferred learning methods and were also perceived as the most effective methods. Participants indicated that they mostly use electronic methods to learn about agricultural safety and health. Generational differences were found for some learning methods. Printed materials were found to be preferred and perceived as effective by Baby Boomers more so than the other cohorts. Electronic methods were mostly used by Gen X and Millennial participants. For learning about agricultural safety, demonstrations are the most preferred and most effective methods but are not used as frequently as the other learning methods. Agricultural safety education should continue delivering safety demonstrations.

演示和一对一培训是最受欢迎的学习方法。最常用的学习方法是电子方法。印刷材料受到婴儿潮一代的青睐,并被认为是有效的。摘要本研究的目的是调查农业劳动力中代际群体在学习方法上的差异,包括使用频率、感知有效性和偏好。共有211名代表农业劳动力的参与者完成了纸质或在线问卷调查。根据参与者的出生年龄确定代际队列。结果表明,无论世代队列,示范和一对一培训是最受欢迎的学习方法,也被认为是最有效的方法。与会者表示,他们大多使用电子方法来了解农业安全和健康。在一些学习方法上发现了代际差异。婴儿潮一代比其他年龄段的人更喜欢印刷材料,并认为印刷材料更有效。电子方式主要由X世代和千禧一代参与者使用。对于农业安全的学习,示范是最受欢迎和最有效的方法,但使用频率不如其他学习方法。农业安全教育要继续开展安全示范。
{"title":"Agricultural Safety and Health Learning Methods for Agricultural Workforces.","authors":"Serap Gorucu,&nbsp;Linda Fetzer","doi":"10.13031/jash.14355","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.14355","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>HIGHLIGHTS Demonstrations and one-on-one training were the most preferred learning methods. The most-used learning methods were electronic methods. Printed materials were preferred and perceived as effective by Baby Boomers. ABSTRACT. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences among generational cohorts in the agricultural workforce in learning methods, including frequency of use, perceived effectiveness, and preference. A total of 211 participants representing the agricultural workforce completed either a paper-based or online questionnaire. Generational cohorts were determined using participants' birth years. The results show that regardless of the generational cohort, demonstrations and one-on-one training were the most preferred learning methods and were also perceived as the most effective methods. Participants indicated that they mostly use electronic methods to learn about agricultural safety and health. Generational differences were found for some learning methods. Printed materials were found to be preferred and perceived as effective by Baby Boomers more so than the other cohorts. Electronic methods were mostly used by Gen X and Millennial participants. For learning about agricultural safety, demonstrations are the most preferred and most effective methods but are not used as frequently as the other learning methods. Agricultural safety education should continue delivering safety demonstrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"27 2","pages":"77-85"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10775267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Potential for Effective Training of Logging Truck Drivers 有效培训伐木卡车司机的潜力
IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.13031/JASH.14084
M. Smidt, D. Mitchell, Kristi K. Logan
The logging industry relies on owner-operators and employed commercial drivers, who comprise up to 40% of logging employment, to transport products from the forest to the mill gate. Truck drivers are exposed to many of the same risks as logging workers as well as additional risks from vehicle crashes. Vehicle crash risks contribute to risk of personal injury and liability related to public safety, which are critical reasons for enhancing driver qualifications. Driver qualifications can be influenced by hiring better drivers and improving drivers’ skills through training even after they have received their commercial driver’s license. To explore the effectiveness of driver training in the logging industry, we reviewed studies of commercial driver training assessment and training interventions that included lectures (on-line or in-person) as a main component. Decision errors and violations are important in crash causation and involve cognitive skills, which are addressed by this type of training. Additionally, lecture training is more accessible than behind-the-wheel or simulator training for logging operations that employ just a few drivers. In their efforts to improve driver qualifications, large commercial carriers often provide driver training, reinforce the training through monitoring, and rely heavily on driver selection. The literature supports the effectiveness of training related to cognitive factors, including fatigue management, behavior, and situational awareness. Successful lecture training interventions are accompanied by individual feedback or coaching. Training that produces measurable outcomes (behavior or crash risk) is supported by a suite of factors involving the trainee, the training, and the company or supervisor.
伐木业依靠业主经营者和受雇的商业司机,他们占伐木业就业人数的40%,将产品从森林运送到工厂门口。卡车司机面临着与伐木工人相同的许多风险,以及车辆碰撞带来的额外风险。车辆碰撞风险增加了人身伤害风险和涉及公共安全的责任,这是提高驾驶员资格的重要原因。雇用更好的司机和通过培训提高司机的技能,即使他们已经获得了商业驾驶执照,也会影响司机的资格。为了探索伐木行业驾驶员培训的有效性,我们回顾了以讲座(在线或面对面)为主要组成部分的商业驾驶员培训评估和培训干预的研究。决策错误和违规行为在事故原因中很重要,涉及认知技能,这是通过这种类型的培训来解决的。此外,讲座培训比仅雇用几个驾驶员的日志操作的驾驶或模拟器培训更容易接受。大型商业航空公司在提高驾驶员素质的过程中,往往会对驾驶员进行培训,并通过监控加强培训,严重依赖驾驶员选拔。文献支持与认知因素相关的训练的有效性,包括疲劳管理、行为和情境意识。成功的讲座培训干预伴随着个人反馈或指导。产生可衡量结果(行为或坠机风险)的培训是由一系列因素支持的,这些因素包括学员、培训、公司或主管。
{"title":"The Potential for Effective Training of Logging Truck Drivers","authors":"M. Smidt, D. Mitchell, Kristi K. Logan","doi":"10.13031/JASH.14084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13031/JASH.14084","url":null,"abstract":"The logging industry relies on owner-operators and employed commercial drivers, who comprise up to 40% of logging employment, to transport products from the forest to the mill gate. Truck drivers are exposed to many of the same risks as logging workers as well as additional risks from vehicle crashes. Vehicle crash risks contribute to risk of personal injury and liability related to public safety, which are critical reasons for enhancing driver qualifications. Driver qualifications can be influenced by hiring better drivers and improving drivers’ skills through training even after they have received their commercial driver’s license. To explore the effectiveness of driver training in the logging industry, we reviewed studies of commercial driver training assessment and training interventions that included lectures (on-line or in-person) as a main component. Decision errors and violations are important in crash causation and involve cognitive skills, which are addressed by this type of training. Additionally, lecture training is more accessible than behind-the-wheel or simulator training for logging operations that employ just a few drivers. In their efforts to improve driver qualifications, large commercial carriers often provide driver training, reinforce the training through monitoring, and rely heavily on driver selection. The literature supports the effectiveness of training related to cognitive factors, including fatigue management, behavior, and situational awareness. Successful lecture training interventions are accompanied by individual feedback or coaching. Training that produces measurable outcomes (behavior or crash risk) is supported by a suite of factors involving the trainee, the training, and the company or supervisor.","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"27 1","pages":"29-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67065231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Estimates of Victim Surface Area and Associated Extraction Force for Partial Entrapment in Grain 谷物部分诱捕的受害者表面积和相关萃取力的估计
IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.13031/JASH.14230
C. Schwab, L. E. Schwab, P. Schwab
HighlightsEight selected anthropometric landmarks were useful for estimating victim surface area and entrapment depth.Surface area estimates for a partially entrapped male victim ranged from 0.0716 to 2.7296 m2.Partial extraction force estimates for a male victim ranged from 0.29 to 3,693 N.Partial extraction force estimates were 18% greater on average when including the arm surface area than when not including the arms.Abstract. A prediction model for estimating extraction forces on entrapped victims was enhanced and modernized in 2018 from the original 1985 model. The prediction model was divided into two conditions based on the victim’s relative position to the grain surface. The first condition was when the victim is completely below the grain surface. The second condition was when the victim’s shoulders are above the grain surface; this condition is the focus of this research. A variable in the prediction model that changes with the depth of entrapment is the surface area of the victim. A sample of 60 male models was used to approximate the human surface area at optimal discrete positions selected based on visually identifiable anthropometric landmarks. The surface area estimates for those 60 partially entrapped male models ranged from 0.0716 to 2.7296 m2. Extraction forces for twelve partially entrapped male body types with various combinations of stature and body mass index were calculated. The extraction forces were calculated for conditions when the victim’s arms were raised (above the grain) and lowered (in the grain). Results from the prediction model showed that surface area contributed less to the partial extraction force for short underweight bodies than for tall extremely obese bodies. At the lower landmarks, i.e., medial malleolus (MM) and knee crease (KN), surface area did not contribute noticeably to the partial extraction force. The contribution of surface area was not noticeable until the victim was buried up to the crotch (landmark CR). Keywords: Farm safety, Grain entrapment, Prediction model, Rescue, Safety.
highlightight选定的人体测量地标对于估计受害者表面积和捕获深度是有用的。被部分困住的男性受害者的表面积估计在0.0716到2.7296平方米之间。男性受害者的部分拔牙力估计值在0.29到3,693 n之间,当包括手臂表面积时,部分拔牙力估计值比不包括手臂时平均高出18%。在1985年的基础上,2018年对估计被困受害者撤离力量的预测模型进行了改进和现代化。根据受害者与颗粒表面的相对位置,将预测模型分为两种情况。第一种情况是受害者完全在谷物表面之下。第二种情况是受害者的肩膀在谷物表面以上;这种情况是本研究的重点。预测模型中随诱捕深度变化的一个变量是受害者的表面积。以60个男性模型为样本,根据视觉上可识别的人体测量标志,在最佳离散位置近似人体表面积。60个部分被困的雄性模型的估算表面积在0.0716 ~ 2.7296 m2之间。计算了12种不同身高和体重指数组合的部分被困男性体型的提取力。提取力是在受害者手臂抬起(在谷物上方)和放下(在谷物中)的情况下计算的。预测模型的结果表明,相对于高的极度肥胖的身体,较矮的体重过轻的身体的表面面积对部分抽拔力的贡献较小。在较低的标志,即内踝(MM)和膝关节折痕(KN),表面积对局部拔牙力的贡献不明显。直到受害者被埋到胯部(标志性CR),表面积的贡献才被注意到。关键词:农场安全,粮食陷阱,预测模型,救援,安全
{"title":"Estimates of Victim Surface Area and Associated Extraction Force for Partial Entrapment in Grain","authors":"C. Schwab, L. E. Schwab, P. Schwab","doi":"10.13031/JASH.14230","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13031/JASH.14230","url":null,"abstract":"HighlightsEight selected anthropometric landmarks were useful for estimating victim surface area and entrapment depth.Surface area estimates for a partially entrapped male victim ranged from 0.0716 to 2.7296 m2.Partial extraction force estimates for a male victim ranged from 0.29 to 3,693 N.Partial extraction force estimates were 18% greater on average when including the arm surface area than when not including the arms.Abstract. A prediction model for estimating extraction forces on entrapped victims was enhanced and modernized in 2018 from the original 1985 model. The prediction model was divided into two conditions based on the victim’s relative position to the grain surface. The first condition was when the victim is completely below the grain surface. The second condition was when the victim’s shoulders are above the grain surface; this condition is the focus of this research. A variable in the prediction model that changes with the depth of entrapment is the surface area of the victim. A sample of 60 male models was used to approximate the human surface area at optimal discrete positions selected based on visually identifiable anthropometric landmarks. The surface area estimates for those 60 partially entrapped male models ranged from 0.0716 to 2.7296 m2. Extraction forces for twelve partially entrapped male body types with various combinations of stature and body mass index were calculated. The extraction forces were calculated for conditions when the victim’s arms were raised (above the grain) and lowered (in the grain). Results from the prediction model showed that surface area contributed less to the partial extraction force for short underweight bodies than for tall extremely obese bodies. At the lower landmarks, i.e., medial malleolus (MM) and knee crease (KN), surface area did not contribute noticeably to the partial extraction force. The contribution of surface area was not noticeable until the victim was buried up to the crotch (landmark CR). Keywords: Farm safety, Grain entrapment, Prediction model, Rescue, Safety.","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"27 1","pages":"53-68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67065439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring Farm Parenting Styles and Child Agricultural Injury 探讨农场父母教养方式与儿童农业伤害
IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.13031/JASH.14297
J. Rudolphi, K. Barnes, B. Kieke, Kyle Koshalek, Casper G Bendixsen
Highlights Over a third of respondents (34.3%) reported a child agricultural injury. About 41% of parents were classified as authoritative (high level of involvement and control), 35.7% as uninvolved, 13.3% as permissive, and 10% as authoritarian. In our sample of farm parents, authoritative parenting is protective against risk-taking behaviors in childhood as well as reducing potential injury among children. Abstract. Four distinct parenting styles have been described: authoritative, authoritarian, permissive, and uninvolved. Parenting styles have been associated with a myriad of child safety and health outcomes. However, the association between parenting style and child agricultural injury has not been explored. This study was conducted among farm parents in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania using a self-administered paper questionnaire. Parents responded to items inquiring about parenting styles, previous child agricultural injuries, personal demographics, and farm characteristics. A total of 238 farm parents responded to the survey. Over a third of respondents (34.3%) reported a child agricultural injury. About 41% of parents were classified as authoritative (demonstrating a high level of involvement and control), 35.7% as uninvolved, 13.3% as permissive, and 10% as authoritarian. In the univariable analyses of parenting style, notable elevations in child injury rates occurred for the authoritarian (RR = 1.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08 to 3.58, p = 0.0274) and uninvolved (RR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.50, p = 0.0506) categories as compared to the referent category of authoritative. In the multivariable analyses that were adjusted for confounding variables, the magnitude of the corresponding RR estimates were less dramatic, although a 69% elevation was still present for the authoritarian parenting style (RR = 1.69, 95% CI 0.91 to 3.15, p = 0.0975). The results of this study contribute to the growing body of literature suggesting that authoritative parenting is protective against risk-taking behaviors in childhood as well as reducing potential injury among children. Clinicians and safety experts should consider parenting styles when developing child agricultural injury prevention resources or interventions.
超过三分之一的答复者(34.3%)报告了一次儿童农业伤害。约41%的父母被归类为权威型(高度介入和控制),35.7%为不介入型,13.3%为放任型,10%为威权型。在我们的农场父母样本中,权威的养育方式可以防止儿童的冒险行为,也可以减少儿童的潜在伤害。摘要他们描述了四种不同的养育方式:权威型、专断型、放任型和不介入型。父母的教养方式与儿童的安全和健康结果有着无数的联系。然而,父母教养方式与儿童农业伤害之间的关系尚未得到探讨。这项研究是在威斯康辛州和宾夕法尼亚州的农场父母中进行的,使用了一份自我管理的纸质问卷。家长们回答了有关养育方式、以前的儿童农业伤害、个人人口统计和农场特征的问题。共有238名农场家长回应了这项调查。超过三分之一的答复者(34.3%)报告了一次儿童农业伤害。大约41%的父母被归类为权威型(表现出高度的参与和控制),35.7%为不参与型,13.3%为放任型,10%为专制型。在父母教养方式的单变量分析中,权威型(RR = 1.96, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.08 ~ 3.58, p = 0.0274)和非权威型(RR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.00 ~ 2.50, p = 0.0506)的儿童伤害率明显高于参照型(权威型)。在对混杂变量进行调整的多变量分析中,相应的RR估计幅度不那么显著,尽管专制父母方式仍然存在69%的升高(RR = 1.69, 95% CI 0.91至3.15,p = 0.0975)。这项研究的结果为越来越多的文献提供了证据,表明权威型父母可以防止儿童的冒险行为,并减少儿童的潜在伤害。临床医生和安全专家在开发儿童农业伤害预防资源或干预措施时应考虑父母教养方式。
{"title":"Exploring Farm Parenting Styles and Child Agricultural Injury","authors":"J. Rudolphi, K. Barnes, B. Kieke, Kyle Koshalek, Casper G Bendixsen","doi":"10.13031/JASH.14297","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13031/JASH.14297","url":null,"abstract":"Highlights Over a third of respondents (34.3%) reported a child agricultural injury. About 41% of parents were classified as authoritative (high level of involvement and control), 35.7% as uninvolved, 13.3% as permissive, and 10% as authoritarian. In our sample of farm parents, authoritative parenting is protective against risk-taking behaviors in childhood as well as reducing potential injury among children. Abstract. Four distinct parenting styles have been described: authoritative, authoritarian, permissive, and uninvolved. Parenting styles have been associated with a myriad of child safety and health outcomes. However, the association between parenting style and child agricultural injury has not been explored. This study was conducted among farm parents in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania using a self-administered paper questionnaire. Parents responded to items inquiring about parenting styles, previous child agricultural injuries, personal demographics, and farm characteristics. A total of 238 farm parents responded to the survey. Over a third of respondents (34.3%) reported a child agricultural injury. About 41% of parents were classified as authoritative (demonstrating a high level of involvement and control), 35.7% as uninvolved, 13.3% as permissive, and 10% as authoritarian. In the univariable analyses of parenting style, notable elevations in child injury rates occurred for the authoritarian (RR = 1.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08 to 3.58, p = 0.0274) and uninvolved (RR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.50, p = 0.0506) categories as compared to the referent category of authoritative. In the multivariable analyses that were adjusted for confounding variables, the magnitude of the corresponding RR estimates were less dramatic, although a 69% elevation was still present for the authoritarian parenting style (RR = 1.69, 95% CI 0.91 to 3.15, p = 0.0975). The results of this study contribute to the growing body of literature suggesting that authoritative parenting is protective against risk-taking behaviors in childhood as well as reducing potential injury among children. Clinicians and safety experts should consider parenting styles when developing child agricultural injury prevention resources or interventions.","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"27 1","pages":"43-52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67065514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Assessing Youth Safety Knowledge through the Agriculture Experience Tracker (AET) 通过农业经验追踪系统评估青少年安全知识
IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.13031/aim.202100910
Scott W. Smalley, Dustin K. Perry, R. G. Lawver, Michael L. Pate, Alyx M. Shultz, R. Hanagriff, Clay Ewell
{"title":"Assessing Youth Safety Knowledge through the Agriculture Experience Tracker (AET)","authors":"Scott W. Smalley, Dustin K. Perry, R. G. Lawver, Michael L. Pate, Alyx M. Shultz, R. Hanagriff, Clay Ewell","doi":"10.13031/aim.202100910","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.202100910","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67064798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing Farm Stress and Community Supports in a U.S.-Mexico Border County. 评估美墨边境县的农场压力和社区支持。
IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.13031/jash.14213
A J Keeney, P J Hernandez, Y Meng

Imperial County, California, is a high-need, medically underserved area that has some of the worst overall health outcomes of all California counties. Given this and the high depression and anxiety rates in agricultural occupations, Imperial County farmers and ranchers may be at an increased risk of stress and poor mental health outcomes. An exploratory mixed methods assessment was used to collect information from 24 farmers and ranchers in Imperial County. Survey topics included questions about farm or ranch operations, farm-related stress, mental health, community support, and health behaviors. The results indicate that most respondents perceive unpredictable factors, such as government regulations, as the most impactful stressors related to their farm or ranch operations. Additionally, depression symptomatology scores were positively correlated with respondents' ability to obtain credit. Efforts to understand farm-related stress and how community support can help Imperial County farmers and ranchers mediate adverse physical and mental health effects through formal and informal networks are considered.

加利福尼亚州帝国县是一个高需求、医疗服务不足的地区,其总体健康状况在加州各县中最差。鉴于这种情况以及农业职业中抑郁和焦虑的高发率,帝国县的农民和牧场主可能面临更大的压力和不良心理健康后果的风险。我们采用了一种探索性的混合方法评估,从帝国县的 24 名农民和牧场主那里收集信息。调查主题包括有关农场或牧场经营、农场相关压力、心理健康、社区支持和健康行为的问题。结果表明,大多数受访者认为政府法规等不可预测因素是对其农场或牧场经营影响最大的压力源。此外,抑郁症状得分与受访者获得信贷的能力呈正相关。本文探讨了如何努力了解与农场相关的压力,以及社区支持如何通过正式和非正式网络帮助帝国县的农民和牧场主调解不利的身心健康影响。
{"title":"Assessing Farm Stress and Community Supports in a U.S.-Mexico Border County.","authors":"A J Keeney, P J Hernandez, Y Meng","doi":"10.13031/jash.14213","DOIUrl":"10.13031/jash.14213","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Imperial County, California, is a high-need, medically underserved area that has some of the worst overall health outcomes of all California counties. Given this and the high depression and anxiety rates in agricultural occupations, Imperial County farmers and ranchers may be at an increased risk of stress and poor mental health outcomes. An exploratory mixed methods assessment was used to collect information from 24 farmers and ranchers in Imperial County. Survey topics included questions about farm or ranch operations, farm-related stress, mental health, community support, and health behaviors. The results indicate that most respondents perceive unpredictable factors, such as government regulations, as the most impactful stressors related to their farm or ranch operations. Additionally, depression symptomatology scores were positively correlated with respondents' ability to obtain credit. Efforts to understand farm-related stress and how community support can help Imperial County farmers and ranchers mediate adverse physical and mental health effects through formal and informal networks are considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"27 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684411/pdf/nihms-1761924.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39743758","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Experiences and Challenges of Foreign Agricultural Workers in Finland 外国农业工人在芬兰的经历与挑战
IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.13031/JASH.13893
T. Mattila, U. Ovaska, B. Kinnunen, V. Tuure, J. Leppälä, K. Taattola, Virve Rinnola, R. Rautiainen
HighlightsBetter control of musculoskeletal workload remains a key factor in improving working conditions on Finnish farms.Orientation and training of workers should be carefully prepared with attention to content, method, and timing.Continued training is needed, especially for foremen and the increasing number of long-term foreign workers.Abstract. Foreign workers have become an important part of the workforce on horticulture and livestock farms in Finland. The aim of this study was to investigate the experiences of foreign workers regarding their working and living conditions. We conducted semi-structured theme interviews during two time periods: in 2008-2009 (n = 40 workers on eight farms) and again in 2018-2019 (n = 9 workers on four farms). We found variations in expectations and goals among workers when they take a job abroad. Compelling factors in the origin country included unemployment, low wages, and low standards of living, and enticing factors in the destination country included social relationships and expectations of better income. Personal networks had a strong role in the recruiting processes. Work on farms is physically demanding, and being a foreign worker affects social life in many ways, such as being separated from family and facing pressures from the home community to arrange jobs for others. New communication technologies have improved possibilities to stay in contact. Employers could contribute to better working and living conditions for foreign workers by improving work organization, ergonomics at work, orientation of new workers, and continued training of supervisors. Worker orientation and training should be carefully planned, taking into consideration the limited language skills, work competence requirements, and possibilities for career advancement of the workers. Keywords: Descriptive study, Foreign farm workers, Horticulture, Occupational safety.
更好地控制肌肉骨骼负荷仍然是改善芬兰农场工作条件的关键因素。员工的入职和培训应认真准备,注意内容、方法和时间。需要持续的培训,特别是对领班和越来越多的长期外籍工人。外国工人已成为芬兰园艺业和畜牧业劳动力的重要组成部分。这项研究的目的是调查外籍工人的工作和生活条件的经验。我们在两个时间段进行了半结构化的主题访谈:2008-2009年(n = 40名工人,8个农场)和2018-2019年(n = 9名工人,4个农场)。我们发现,当员工到国外工作时,他们的期望和目标会有所不同。原籍国的吸引因素包括失业、低工资和低生活水平,而目的地国的吸引因素包括社会关系和对更高收入的期望。人际网络在招聘过程中起着重要作用。在农场工作需要体力,作为一名外国工人在许多方面影响社会生活,例如与家人分离,并面临来自家乡社区为他人安排工作的压力。新的通信技术提高了人们保持联系的可能性。雇主可以通过改善工作组织、工作中的人体工程学、新工人的培训和继续培训主管,为外国工人提供更好的工作和生活条件。考虑到工人有限的语言技能、工作能力要求和职业发展的可能性,应仔细规划工人的入职和培训。关键词:描述性研究,外来农场工人,园艺,职业安全。
{"title":"Experiences and Challenges of Foreign Agricultural Workers in Finland","authors":"T. Mattila, U. Ovaska, B. Kinnunen, V. Tuure, J. Leppälä, K. Taattola, Virve Rinnola, R. Rautiainen","doi":"10.13031/JASH.13893","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13031/JASH.13893","url":null,"abstract":"HighlightsBetter control of musculoskeletal workload remains a key factor in improving working conditions on Finnish farms.Orientation and training of workers should be carefully prepared with attention to content, method, and timing.Continued training is needed, especially for foremen and the increasing number of long-term foreign workers.Abstract. Foreign workers have become an important part of the workforce on horticulture and livestock farms in Finland. The aim of this study was to investigate the experiences of foreign workers regarding their working and living conditions. We conducted semi-structured theme interviews during two time periods: in 2008-2009 (n = 40 workers on eight farms) and again in 2018-2019 (n = 9 workers on four farms). We found variations in expectations and goals among workers when they take a job abroad. Compelling factors in the origin country included unemployment, low wages, and low standards of living, and enticing factors in the destination country included social relationships and expectations of better income. Personal networks had a strong role in the recruiting processes. Work on farms is physically demanding, and being a foreign worker affects social life in many ways, such as being separated from family and facing pressures from the home community to arrange jobs for others. New communication technologies have improved possibilities to stay in contact. Employers could contribute to better working and living conditions for foreign workers by improving work organization, ergonomics at work, orientation of new workers, and continued training of supervisors. Worker orientation and training should be carefully planned, taking into consideration the limited language skills, work competence requirements, and possibilities for career advancement of the workers. Keywords: Descriptive study, Foreign farm workers, Horticulture, Occupational safety.","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"27 1","pages":"13-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67065068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
期刊
Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1