首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health最新文献

英文 中文
Factors Influencing Worker Safety in Grain Handling: An Advisory Panel Perspective. 影响粮食加工工人安全的因素:顾问团的观点。
IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI: 10.13031/jash.15915
Elzerie Derry, Gretchen A Mosher, Kingsly Ambrose

Highlights: Findings confirmed that out-of-condition grain is a primary causal factor in grain entrapment and engulfment. The advisory panel confirmed that grain quality has implications for grain dust explosions. Findings highlighted a lack of in-depth knowledge expected from an expert panel, specifically on aspects of protective grain quality traits.

Abstract: Out-of-condition grain has been identified as a primary causal factor in grain entrapments and engulfments. The quality of grain also has implications for grain dust explosions. Limited research has examined exactly which elements of grain condition influence worker safety in grain handling. This research project aimed to establish an advisory panel to examine and provide input on how elements of grain condition relate to worker safety risks in grain handling. A purposeful sampling technique was used to obtain a sample of grain handling and storage experts to function in an advisory role for the project. A primary aim of this research was to understand the problem further, provide input on tested variables, and guide educational and dissemination efforts. As is true for qualitative methodologies, those selected as part of the targeted sample cannot be generalized to other experts in the field of grain handling. The final sample contained six industry representatives, five academic professionals, and two insurance/regulatory professionals. Participants interviewed had varied expertise with grain-based safety events. Of those interviewed, 23% of participants had personal experience, 54% had bystander or investigator experience, and 23% had training experience. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to further understand the problem, provide input on important elements in safe grain handling, and guide educational and dissemination efforts. Interviews were analyzed with a primary objective to identify elements of grain condition that play a role in the incidence of grain entrapment, grain engulfments, or grain dust explosions. NVivo 14 was used to conduct a thematic analysis, and four overall themes were identified, which included challenges to worker safety in the grain handling industry, areas where improved communication is needed, grain quality indicators that may play a role in safety incidents, and available mitigation strategies. The themes are the opinions of the advisory panel and may not reflect those of the entire grain handling industry.

重点:研究结果证实,状态不良的粮食是粮食夹带和吞没的主要原因。咨询小组确认,粮食质量与粮食粉尘爆炸有关。调查结果突出表明,专家小组缺乏深入的知识,特别是在保护性谷物品质性状方面。摘要:变质粮食已被确定为粮食夹带和吞没的主要原因。粮食的质量对粮食粉尘爆炸也有影响。有限的研究准确地考察了粮食状况的哪些因素影响了粮食装卸工人的安全。该研究项目旨在建立一个咨询小组,审查粮食状况因素与粮食处理工人安全风险之间的关系,并提供投入。一种有目的的抽样技术被用来获得谷物处理和储存专家的样本,以便在项目中发挥咨询作用。这项研究的主要目的是进一步了解这个问题,为测试变量提供输入,并指导教育和传播工作。与定性方法一样,那些被选为目标样本一部分的方法不能推广到粮食处理领域的其他专家。最后的样本包括6名行业代表、5名学术专业人士和2名保险/监管专业人士。受访者对粮食安全事件有不同的专业知识。在受访者中,23%的参与者有个人经历,54%有旁观者或调查员经历,23%有培训经历。进行了半结构化访谈,以进一步了解问题,就安全谷物处理的重要因素提供意见,并指导教育和宣传工作。对访谈进行分析的主要目的是确定在粮食滞留、粮食吞没或粮食粉尘爆炸发生率中起作用的粮食状况因素。利用NVivo 14进行专题分析,确定了四个总体主题,其中包括粮食装卸行业工人安全面临的挑战、需要改进沟通的领域、可能在安全事故中发挥作用的粮食质量指标以及可用的缓解战略。这些主题是顾问小组的意见,可能并不反映整个粮食加工行业的意见。
{"title":"Factors Influencing Worker Safety in Grain Handling: An Advisory Panel Perspective.","authors":"Elzerie Derry, Gretchen A Mosher, Kingsly Ambrose","doi":"10.13031/jash.15915","DOIUrl":"10.13031/jash.15915","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Findings confirmed that out-of-condition grain is a primary causal factor in grain entrapment and engulfment. The advisory panel confirmed that grain quality has implications for grain dust explosions. Findings highlighted a lack of in-depth knowledge expected from an expert panel, specifically on aspects of protective grain quality traits.</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Out-of-condition grain has been identified as a primary causal factor in grain entrapments and engulfments. The quality of grain also has implications for grain dust explosions. Limited research has examined exactly which elements of grain condition influence worker safety in grain handling. This research project aimed to establish an advisory panel to examine and provide input on how elements of grain condition relate to worker safety risks in grain handling. A purposeful sampling technique was used to obtain a sample of grain handling and storage experts to function in an advisory role for the project. A primary aim of this research was to understand the problem further, provide input on tested variables, and guide educational and dissemination efforts. As is true for qualitative methodologies, those selected as part of the targeted sample cannot be generalized to other experts in the field of grain handling. The final sample contained six industry representatives, five academic professionals, and two insurance/regulatory professionals. Participants interviewed had varied expertise with grain-based safety events. Of those interviewed, 23% of participants had personal experience, 54% had bystander or investigator experience, and 23% had training experience. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to further understand the problem, provide input on important elements in safe grain handling, and guide educational and dissemination efforts. Interviews were analyzed with a primary objective to identify elements of grain condition that play a role in the incidence of grain entrapment, grain engulfments, or grain dust explosions. NVivo 14 was used to conduct a thematic analysis, and four overall themes were identified, which included challenges to worker safety in the grain handling industry, areas where improved communication is needed, grain quality indicators that may play a role in safety incidents, and available mitigation strategies. The themes are the opinions of the advisory panel and may not reflect those of the entire grain handling industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"30 4","pages":"163-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143626301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial Intelligence-Driven All-Terrain Vehicle Crash Prediction and Prevention System. 人工智能驱动的全地形车辆碰撞预测与预防系统。
IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI: 10.13031/jash.16079
Farzaneh Khorsandi, Guilherme De Moura Araujo, Fernando Ferrei

Highlights: An AI-driven system for predicting and preventing ATV crashes was developed. Machine learning model achieved rollover prediction accuracy of over 99%. The system has the potential to significantly reduce ATV-related injuries and fatalities by enabling preemptive actions.

Abstract: All-Terrain Vehicle (ATV) crashes have become a public health concern in the U.S. over the past decades, resulting in numerous fatalities and hospitalizations. Most of those incidents could have been prevented if riders could better assess their ability to handle risks. Currently, risk factors associated with ATV incidents have already been studied. However, little effort has been made toward developing practical applications that assist the rider in preventing crashes. Commercial ATV safety systems, such as Farm Angel, focus on post-crash detection and emergency medical services (EMS) alerting rather than preventive measures. Machine learning prediction models can be used to assist riders in taking preventive measures to avoid an imminent crash. In this study, we developed a system that leverages the predictive power of machine learning algorithms to assess the likelihood of a crash in real-time and alert the riders, thus allowing them to prevent the crash. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only system ever developed for ATVs specifically that can predict rollover incidents. The crash likelihood is estimated by a deep neural network that considers the ride parameters (e.g., ATV speed, turning radius, and roll and pitch angles), ATV characteristics (e.g., width, length, wheelbase), and human factors (i.e., presence of a rider). The ATV characteristics and the presence of a rider are retrieved from the rider's input through a smartphone application developed specifically for this study. The ride parameters are retrieved from an embedded system (attached to the ATV). Validation and performance tests indicated that: (1) the proposed device has a rollover prediction system with an accuracy superior to 99%; (2) the system can detect roll and pitch angles with average errors of 0.26 and 0.54 degrees, respectively; and (3) the system can detect the ATV's speed with an average error of 0.75 m s-1.

重点:开发了人工智能驱动的ATV碰撞预测和预防系统。机器学习模型实现了99%以上的侧翻预测准确率。该系统通过采取先发制人的行动,有可能显著减少与atv相关的伤害和死亡。摘要:在过去的几十年里,全地形车(ATV)碰撞已经成为美国的一个公共卫生问题,导致了大量的死亡和住院治疗。如果乘客能够更好地评估自己处理风险的能力,大多数事故都是可以避免的。目前,与亚视事故相关的危险因素已经得到了研究。然而,在开发实际应用以帮助骑手防止碰撞方面,却很少做出努力。商用ATV安全系统,如Farm Angel,侧重于碰撞后检测和紧急医疗服务(EMS)警报,而不是预防措施。机器学习预测模型可以用来帮助乘客采取预防措施,避免即将发生的撞车事故。在这项研究中,我们开发了一个系统,利用机器学习算法的预测能力来实时评估撞车的可能性,并提醒乘客,从而使他们能够防止撞车。据我们所知,这是迄今为止唯一一个专门为全地形车开发的能够预测翻车事故的系统。碰撞可能性由深度神经网络估计,该网络考虑了乘坐参数(例如,ATV速度,转弯半径,滚转和俯仰角),ATV特性(例如,宽度,长度,轴距)和人为因素(例如,骑手的存在)。通过专门为本研究开发的智能手机应用程序,从骑手的输入中检索ATV特征和骑手的存在。骑行参数从嵌入式系统(附在ATV上)检索。验证和性能测试表明:(1)该装置具有精度优于99%的翻转预测系统;(2)系统能检测出平均误差为0.26度和0.54度的横摇角和俯仰角;(3)系统可以检测ATV的速度,平均误差为0.75 m s-1。
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence-Driven All-Terrain Vehicle Crash Prediction and Prevention System.","authors":"Farzaneh Khorsandi, Guilherme De Moura Araujo, Fernando Ferrei","doi":"10.13031/jash.16079","DOIUrl":"10.13031/jash.16079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Highlights: </strong>An AI-driven system for predicting and preventing ATV crashes was developed. Machine learning model achieved rollover prediction accuracy of over 99%. The system has the potential to significantly reduce ATV-related injuries and fatalities by enabling preemptive actions.</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>All-Terrain Vehicle (ATV) crashes have become a public health concern in the U.S. over the past decades, resulting in numerous fatalities and hospitalizations. Most of those incidents could have been prevented if riders could better assess their ability to handle risks. Currently, risk factors associated with ATV incidents have already been studied. However, little effort has been made toward developing practical applications that assist the rider in preventing crashes. Commercial ATV safety systems, such as Farm Angel, focus on post-crash detection and emergency medical services (EMS) alerting rather than preventive measures. Machine learning prediction models can be used to assist riders in taking preventive measures to avoid an imminent crash. In this study, we developed a system that leverages the predictive power of machine learning algorithms to assess the likelihood of a crash in real-time and alert the riders, thus allowing them to prevent the crash. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only system ever developed for ATVs specifically that can predict rollover incidents. The crash likelihood is estimated by a deep neural network that considers the ride parameters (e.g., ATV speed, turning radius, and roll and pitch angles), ATV characteristics (e.g., width, length, wheelbase), and human factors (i.e., presence of a rider). The ATV characteristics and the presence of a rider are retrieved from the rider's input through a smartphone application developed specifically for this study. The ride parameters are retrieved from an embedded system (attached to the ATV). Validation and performance tests indicated that: (1) the proposed device has a rollover prediction system with an accuracy superior to 99%; (2) the system can detect roll and pitch angles with average errors of 0.26 and 0.54 degrees, respectively; and (3) the system can detect the ATV's speed with an average error of 0.75 m s-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"30 4","pages":"139-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143626396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Testing the Feasibility of Selected, Commercially Available Wearable Devices in Detecting Agricultural-Related Incidents. 测试选定的商业可穿戴设备在检测农业相关事件中的可行性。
IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI: 10.13031/jash.15985
Aaron James Etienne, William E Field, Shawn G Ehlers, Roger Tormoehlen, Noah Joel Haslett
<p><strong>Highlights: </strong>The purpose of this research was to validate a test procedure for using commercially available smart technologies in detecting an agricultural-related incident. A convenient selection of commercially available wearable devices was used to measure the inertial qualities of simulated incidents. Simulated ejections, falls, and upsets were performed to recreate leading causes of agricultural injuries and fatalities using an anthropomorphic test device. Only 2 of 27 simulated incidents triggered detection on the selected wearable devices tested. The results of this study were inconclusive in determining the feasibility of commercially available wearable devices in detecting agricultural-related incidents. More research is needed to develop an improved testing procedure. Additional collaboration is needed with manufacturers of wearable incident detection devices to clearly identify potential applications and limitations of their devices.</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>A study was conducted to test a selection of commercially available wearable devices to determine their feasibility for triggering incident detection during a variety of simulated agricultural incidents with high risk of causing injury. The goal was to ultimately increase survivability outcomes for victims by enhancing notification and reducing response time from emergency services. A 50th percentile adult male anthropomorphic test device (ATD). was fitted with a convenient selection of commercially available wearable smart technologies to measure the responsiveness of the technology's incident detection software. Devices used for this testing were: (1) Garmin Vivoactive 4 smartwatch; (2) Apple Watch Series 7 (Bluetooth only and cellular models); and (3) Movesense Active tracking device. A Samsung Galaxy S22 smartphone and an Apple iPhone 12 smartphone were used to connect the wearable devices and measured impact through their internal inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors. Simulated ejections from equipment, vertical falls, and vehicle overturns were performed with the ATD. Side upsets were simulated with the ATD positioned in the operator station of a 52-drawbar horsepower (dbp), two-wheel drive, standard front axle, diesel tractor, weighing 6500 pounds. The tractor was equipped with an approved ROPS. Side upsets were also simulated using a 22-horsepower zero-turn mower, with the ATD positioned in the operator seat. Falls were simulated from heights of up to 4.57 meters. After each simulated incident, devices were examined to determine whether or not incident detection was successfully triggered. Data was then collected from an internal sensor logging application installed on the selected devices. It was found that the incident detection feature on the identified wearable devices only triggered in specific scenarios. Only 2 of the 27 simulated incidents successfully triggered incident detection on one device. Only the Garmin Vivoactive 4 smartwatch tr
重点:本研究的目的是验证使用商用智能技术检测农业相关事件的测试程序。通过方便地选择市售可穿戴设备来测量模拟事件的惯性质量。模拟弹射,跌倒,和颠覆进行了重建农业伤害和死亡的主要原因使用拟人化的测试装置。27个模拟事件中只有2个触发了选定的可穿戴设备的检测。这项研究的结果在确定商用可穿戴设备在检测农业相关事件方面的可行性方面尚无定论。需要更多的研究来开发改进的测试程序。需要与可穿戴事件检测设备的制造商进行额外的合作,以清楚地识别其设备的潜在应用和局限性。摘要:本研究测试了一系列市售可穿戴设备,以确定其在各种高伤害风险的模拟农业事件中触发事件检测的可行性。目标是通过加强通知和缩短紧急服务的反应时间,最终提高受害者的生存能力。50百分位成年男性拟人化测试装置(ATD)。配备了方便选择的市售可穿戴智能技术,以测量该技术的事件检测软件的响应能力。本次测试使用的设备有:(1)Garmin Vivoactive 4智能手表;(2) Apple Watch Series 7(仅支持蓝牙和蜂窝机型);(3) Movesense主动跟踪装置。使用三星Galaxy S22智能手机和苹果iPhone 12智能手机连接可穿戴设备,并通过其内部惯性测量单元(IMU)传感器测量影响。用ATD模拟了设备弹射、垂直坠落和车辆倾覆。在模拟侧翻时,ATD安装在一个52牵引力马力(dbp)、标准前桥、重6500磅的柴油牵引车的操作台上。该拖拉机配备了经批准的ROPS。使用22马力的零转割草机模拟侧翻,ATD安装在操作员座椅上。从高达4.57米的高度模拟了瀑布。在每个模拟事件之后,检查设备以确定是否成功触发了事件检测。然后从安装在选定设备上的内部传感器日志应用程序收集数据。结果发现,被识别的可穿戴设备上的事件检测功能仅在特定场景下触发。27个模拟事件中只有2个成功触发了同一设备上的事件检测。只有Garmin Vivoactive 4智能手表触发了事件检测。在模拟拖拉机翻倒试验和模拟零转割草机翻倒试验中,ATD冲击时没有触发任何装置。结论是,这些装置目前的形式在检测与农业有关的严重伤害方面是不可靠的,特别是考虑到在最有可能发生这些事件的地区缺乏足够的移动电话覆盖。
{"title":"Testing the Feasibility of Selected, Commercially Available Wearable Devices in Detecting Agricultural-Related Incidents.","authors":"Aaron James Etienne, William E Field, Shawn G Ehlers, Roger Tormoehlen, Noah Joel Haslett","doi":"10.13031/jash.15985","DOIUrl":"10.13031/jash.15985","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights: &lt;/strong&gt;The purpose of this research was to validate a test procedure for using commercially available smart technologies in detecting an agricultural-related incident. A convenient selection of commercially available wearable devices was used to measure the inertial qualities of simulated incidents. Simulated ejections, falls, and upsets were performed to recreate leading causes of agricultural injuries and fatalities using an anthropomorphic test device. Only 2 of 27 simulated incidents triggered detection on the selected wearable devices tested. The results of this study were inconclusive in determining the feasibility of commercially available wearable devices in detecting agricultural-related incidents. More research is needed to develop an improved testing procedure. Additional collaboration is needed with manufacturers of wearable incident detection devices to clearly identify potential applications and limitations of their devices.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Abstract: &lt;/strong&gt;A study was conducted to test a selection of commercially available wearable devices to determine their feasibility for triggering incident detection during a variety of simulated agricultural incidents with high risk of causing injury. The goal was to ultimately increase survivability outcomes for victims by enhancing notification and reducing response time from emergency services. A 50th percentile adult male anthropomorphic test device (ATD). was fitted with a convenient selection of commercially available wearable smart technologies to measure the responsiveness of the technology's incident detection software. Devices used for this testing were: (1) Garmin Vivoactive 4 smartwatch; (2) Apple Watch Series 7 (Bluetooth only and cellular models); and (3) Movesense Active tracking device. A Samsung Galaxy S22 smartphone and an Apple iPhone 12 smartphone were used to connect the wearable devices and measured impact through their internal inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors. Simulated ejections from equipment, vertical falls, and vehicle overturns were performed with the ATD. Side upsets were simulated with the ATD positioned in the operator station of a 52-drawbar horsepower (dbp), two-wheel drive, standard front axle, diesel tractor, weighing 6500 pounds. The tractor was equipped with an approved ROPS. Side upsets were also simulated using a 22-horsepower zero-turn mower, with the ATD positioned in the operator seat. Falls were simulated from heights of up to 4.57 meters. After each simulated incident, devices were examined to determine whether or not incident detection was successfully triggered. Data was then collected from an internal sensor logging application installed on the selected devices. It was found that the incident detection feature on the identified wearable devices only triggered in specific scenarios. Only 2 of the 27 simulated incidents successfully triggered incident detection on one device. Only the Garmin Vivoactive 4 smartwatch tr","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"30 4","pages":"181-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143626343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
>Documenting Baseline Efficacy of Grain Rescue Training for Emergency First Responders Through Pre- and Post-Testing, and Follow-Up Survey. 通过前后测试和随访调查,记录应急第一响应者粮食救援培训的基线效果。
IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI: 10.13031/jash.16012
Yuan-Hsin Cheng, William E Field, Salah F Issa, Brian F French, Shawn G Ehlers, Edward J Sheldon
<p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Pre- and post-tests, administered to 2,141 emergency first responder participants, showed an average improvement in test scores from 67% to 75%, highlighting the efficacy of the training. Interviews conducted within 3 years post-training revealed high participant satisfaction, with over 25% reporting adoption of key strategies discussed in the training by their fire/rescue service. Areas of concern were identified, including the lack of understanding related to certain hazards, such as free-flowing grain, which may put first responders at risk of secondary victimization.</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Purdue University's Agricultural Safety and Health Program has provided leadership for nearly 40 years in the documentation of fatalities and injuries associated with agricultural confined spaces, especially those relating to grain storage, handling, and transport. Findings have been used to develop evidence-based resources to assist in the prevention and mitigation of these incidents, including the design of in-service training resources for emergency rescue and medical personnel responding to entrapments or engulfment in agricultural confined spaces. To enhance the efficacy and consistency of these training resources, a list of core competencies was developed with companion test questions by a panel of experts to validate the baseline understanding and knowledge gain of training participants. The test questions were pilot tested as pre- and post-tests and incorporated into a curriculum developed under a U.S. Department of Labor Susan Harwood Training Grant. The twenty-question pre- and post-tests were administered to 2,141 registered emergency first responder participants in training conducted primarily in Indiana. Participation was voluntary, providing 671 usable matched pre- and post-tests. On average, test scores improved from 67% to 75%. A question-by-question review highlighted areas of common knowledge as well as at least one topic in which the potential for confusion was increased by the instructional content. In addition, participants were interviewed within 3 years to assess the impact of the training received. Interviewees indicated a high level of satisfaction with the training, and over 25% indicated that their fire/rescue service adopted at least one of the seven key strategies discussed in the training. One key concern observed in training was the lack of understanding related to certain hazards, such as the nature of free-flowing grain, that may put first responders at risk of becoming secondary victims during rescue and extrication efforts. A need was identified for continued improvement of emergency first responder training through the incorporation of recent research findings on confined space rescue, greater attention to the prevention of secondary injuries, and more consistent instructor preparation in order to increase the probability of successful outcomes from incidents involving grain stora
亮点:对 2 141 名急救人员进行的前后测试表明,测试成绩平均提高了 67% 至 75%,突出表明了培训的有效性。培训后 3 年内进行的访谈显示,学员的满意度很高,超过 25% 的学员表示他们所在的消防/救援部门采用了培训中讨论的关键策略。培训还发现了一些值得关注的问题,其中包括对某些危险缺乏了解,如自由流动的谷物,这可能会使急救人员面临二次伤害的风险。 摘要:近 40 年来,普渡大学的农业安全与健康项目在记录与农业密闭空间相关的伤亡事故方面一直处于领先地位,尤其是与谷物储存、处理和运输相关的事故。研究结果已被用于开发基于证据的资源,以协助预防和缓解这些事故,包括为应对农业密闭空间中的诱捕或吞没事故的紧急救援和医疗人员设计在职培训资源。为了提高这些培训资源的有效性和一致性,专家小组制定了一份核心能力清单,并附有测试问题,以验证培训参与者的基本理解和知识收获。测试问题作为前测和后测进行了试点测试,并纳入了根据美国劳工部苏珊-哈伍德培训拨款开发的课程中。在主要于印第安纳州举办的培训中,对 2,141 名注册的急救人员进行了 20 个问题的前后测试。参与者自愿参加,提供了 671 份可使用的匹配前后测试。平均而言,测试成绩从 67% 提高到 75%。对问题的逐一审查突出了常识领域以及至少一个因教学内容而增加了混淆可能性的题目。此外,还在 3 年内对参与者进行了访谈,以评估所接受培训的影响。受访者对培训的满意度很高,超过 25% 的受访者表示,他们所在的消防/救援部门至少采用了培训中讨论的七项关键策略中的一项。培训中发现的一个主要问题是,受访者对某些危险缺乏了解,例如自由流动谷物的性质,这可能会使急救人员在救援和解救过程中面临成为次要受害者的风险。我们发现有必要继续改进对第一反应者的应急培训,方法是纳入有关密闭空间救援的最新研究成果,更加关注预防二次伤害,以及更加连贯一致的教员准备工作,以提高在涉及谷物储存、处理和运输的事故中取得成功结果的概率。
{"title":">Documenting Baseline Efficacy of Grain Rescue Training for Emergency First Responders Through Pre- and Post-Testing, and Follow-Up Survey.","authors":"Yuan-Hsin Cheng, William E Field, Salah F Issa, Brian F French, Shawn G Ehlers, Edward J Sheldon","doi":"10.13031/jash.16012","DOIUrl":"10.13031/jash.16012","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights: &lt;/strong&gt;Pre- and post-tests, administered to 2,141 emergency first responder participants, showed an average improvement in test scores from 67% to 75%, highlighting the efficacy of the training. Interviews conducted within 3 years post-training revealed high participant satisfaction, with over 25% reporting adoption of key strategies discussed in the training by their fire/rescue service. Areas of concern were identified, including the lack of understanding related to certain hazards, such as free-flowing grain, which may put first responders at risk of secondary victimization.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Abstract: &lt;/strong&gt;Purdue University's Agricultural Safety and Health Program has provided leadership for nearly 40 years in the documentation of fatalities and injuries associated with agricultural confined spaces, especially those relating to grain storage, handling, and transport. Findings have been used to develop evidence-based resources to assist in the prevention and mitigation of these incidents, including the design of in-service training resources for emergency rescue and medical personnel responding to entrapments or engulfment in agricultural confined spaces. To enhance the efficacy and consistency of these training resources, a list of core competencies was developed with companion test questions by a panel of experts to validate the baseline understanding and knowledge gain of training participants. The test questions were pilot tested as pre- and post-tests and incorporated into a curriculum developed under a U.S. Department of Labor Susan Harwood Training Grant. The twenty-question pre- and post-tests were administered to 2,141 registered emergency first responder participants in training conducted primarily in Indiana. Participation was voluntary, providing 671 usable matched pre- and post-tests. On average, test scores improved from 67% to 75%. A question-by-question review highlighted areas of common knowledge as well as at least one topic in which the potential for confusion was increased by the instructional content. In addition, participants were interviewed within 3 years to assess the impact of the training received. Interviewees indicated a high level of satisfaction with the training, and over 25% indicated that their fire/rescue service adopted at least one of the seven key strategies discussed in the training. One key concern observed in training was the lack of understanding related to certain hazards, such as the nature of free-flowing grain, that may put first responders at risk of becoming secondary victims during rescue and extrication efforts. A need was identified for continued improvement of emergency first responder training through the incorporation of recent research findings on confined space rescue, greater attention to the prevention of secondary injuries, and more consistent instructor preparation in order to increase the probability of successful outcomes from incidents involving grain stora","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"30 3","pages":"123-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143626380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing Relationship Between Goat and Sheep Farmers' Stress and Their Demographics: A Pilot Study. 评估山羊和绵羊养殖户压力与人口统计学之间的关系:一项初步研究。
IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI: 10.13031/jash.15820
Suzanna R Windon, Carolyn Henzi

Highlights: Limited leisure time, insufficient sleep, and family members' health conditions were the top personal stressors. Occupational stressors were too much to do in so little time, worrying about the farm's future and financial issues. Governmental regulation, market prices, and unpredictable weather conditions were off-farm occupational stressors. The work hours during the busy season and farm size were significant predictors of farmers' stress. The farmer's age and years in the farm business were not significant predictors of the farmer's stress.

Abstract: This pilot study aims to investigate goat and sheep farmers' stress amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors developed a questionnaire based on existing literature to measure farmers' stress. The online questionnaire was sent to the 3000 goat and sheep farmers registered in the Penn State Extension Listserv. We used the technique described by Dillman et al. (2014) to collect online data. After cleaning the data, the response rate was 6.8% (n = 204). The mean and SD for farmer's stress were 3.0±.63 out of 5, occupational stress 3.11±.65, and personal stress 2.80 ± .82, respectively. During the COVID-19 pandemic, work hours during the busy season and farm size exhibited a positive low association with farmers' stress (rs = .245 and rs = .238, respectively). They predicted 10% of the total variation in farmers' stress. We propose that extension professionals and public health practitioners learn lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic in case other public health concerns arise. We suggest that future educational programs addressing stress among farmers prioritize specific strategies to reduce occupational stress and cope with uncertainty during health-related outbreaks or other crises. An interesting avenue for further investigation can involve examining other issues related to farmers' financial planning, time management (especially during the busy season), and their relationships with family members.

亮点闲暇时间有限、睡眠不足和家庭成员的健康状况是最大的个人压力。职业压力是时间太少,事情太多,担心农场的未来和财务问题。政府监管、市场价格和不可预测的天气状况是农场外的职业压力源。农忙季节的工作时间和农场规模是预测农民压力的重要因素。摘要:本试验研究旨在调查山羊和绵羊养殖户在 COVID-19 大流行时的压力。作者根据现有文献编制了一份调查问卷,用于测量农民的压力。在线问卷被发送给在宾夕法尼亚州立大学推广名录服务站注册的 3000 名山羊和绵羊养殖户。我们使用了 Dillman 等人(2014 年)描述的技术来收集在线数据。清理数据后,回复率为 6.8%(n = 204)。农民压力的平均值和标准差分别为 3.0±.63(满分 5 分)、职业压力 3.11±.65、个人压力 2.80±.82。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,农忙季节的工作时间和农场规模与农民的压力呈低正相关(rs = .245 和 rs = .238)。它们预测了农民压力总变化的 10%。我们建议推广专业人员和公共卫生从业人员从 COVID-19 大流行中吸取教训,以防出现其他公共卫生问题。我们建议,未来针对农民压力的教育计划应优先考虑在健康相关疾病爆发或其他危机期间减少职业压力和应对不确定性的具体策略。进一步调查的一个有趣途径是研究与农民的财务规划、时间管理(尤其是在农忙时节)以及他们与家庭成员的关系有关的其他问题。
{"title":"Assessing Relationship Between Goat and Sheep Farmers' Stress and Their Demographics: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Suzanna R Windon, Carolyn Henzi","doi":"10.13031/jash.15820","DOIUrl":"10.13031/jash.15820","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Limited leisure time, insufficient sleep, and family members' health conditions were the top personal stressors. Occupational stressors were too much to do in so little time, worrying about the farm's future and financial issues. Governmental regulation, market prices, and unpredictable weather conditions were off-farm occupational stressors. The work hours during the busy season and farm size were significant predictors of farmers' stress. The farmer's age and years in the farm business were not significant predictors of the farmer's stress.</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This pilot study aims to investigate goat and sheep farmers' stress amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors developed a questionnaire based on existing literature to measure farmers' stress. The online questionnaire was sent to the 3000 goat and sheep farmers registered in the Penn State Extension Listserv. We used the technique described by Dillman et al. (2014) to collect online data. After cleaning the data, the response rate was 6.8% (n = 204). The mean and SD for farmer's stress were 3.0±.63 out of 5, occupational stress 3.11±.65, and personal stress 2.80 ± .82, respectively. During the COVID-19 pandemic, work hours during the busy season and farm size exhibited a positive low association with farmers' stress (r<sub>s</sub> = .245 and r<sub>s</sub> = .238, respectively). They predicted 10% of the total variation in farmers' stress. We propose that extension professionals and public health practitioners learn lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic in case other public health concerns arise. We suggest that future educational programs addressing stress among farmers prioritize specific strategies to reduce occupational stress and cope with uncertainty during health-related outbreaks or other crises. An interesting avenue for further investigation can involve examining other issues related to farmers' financial planning, time management (especially during the busy season), and their relationships with family members.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"30 3","pages":"107-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143626394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An Automated On-The-Go Unloading System Reduces Harvest Operator Stress Relative to Manual Operation. 与手动操作相比,自动移动卸载系统减少了采收操作人员的压力。
IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI: 10.13031/jash.15992
Travis A Burgers, Kusha Kamarei, Mukund Vora, Matthew Horne

Highlights: Stress was measured in harvest operators who performed on-the-go unloading manually and with an automated system. Automated unloading reduced the average grain cart and combine operator stress rate by 18% and 12%, respectively, compared to manual operation. Harvest operators usually worked more than 9 hours and often worked more than 12hours per workday during harvest. The use of automated unloading systems could positively affect the health of harvest operators.

Abstract: On-the-go unloading improves harvest operational efficiency, but it requires skilled labor because it is challenging and stressful to balance numerous concurrent tasks. Harvest automation reduces workload, stress, and fatigue. The objective of this study was to determine if using a commercially available, automated on-the-go unloading system (Raven Cart AutomationTM, RCA, Raven Industries) would reduce operator stress compared to manual operation. Nine grain cart tractor operators and six combine operators participated in this study. Operators performed their typical harvest operation, except to alternate on-the-go unloading using RCA or operating manually. Skin conductance (electrodermal activity) was measured with an Empatica E4 wristband, and stressful events were quantified. Machine data was collected from the tractor and combine via CAN logs. Over 200 total unload events were analyzed. Grain cart and combine operators using RCA had an 18% (p = 0.022) and 12% (p = 0.18) reduction in stress rate, respectively, compared to operating the grain cart tractor manually. RCA reduced the tractor cross-track error standard deviation by 2.5 cm on straight passes (p < 0.0001). The use of an automated on-the-go unloading system reduces operator stress during harvest and could positively affect the health of operators, especially during the long harvest workdays.

亮点:在手动卸载和自动卸载作业的收获作业人员中测量了压力。与手动操作相比,自动卸载将谷物车和联合作业人员的平均压力率分别降低了18%和12%。采收工人通常工作9个小时以上,在采收期间每个工作日通常工作12个小时以上。使用自动卸载系统会对采收作业人员的健康产生积极影响。摘要:移动卸载提高了收获作业效率,但由于需要熟练的劳动力来平衡众多并发任务,因此具有挑战性和压力。收获自动化减少了工作量、压力和疲劳。本研究的目的是确定与人工操作相比,使用商业上可用的自动移动卸载系统(Raven Cart AutomationTM, RCA, Raven Industries)是否可以减轻操作人员的压力。9名粮食车拖拉机操作员和6名联合收割机操作员参加了本研究。作业人员进行了典型的收获作业,除了使用RCA交替进行卸载或手动操作。使用Empatica E4腕带测量皮肤电导(皮电活动),并对应激事件进行量化。机器数据通过CAN日志从拖拉机和联合收割机收集。总共分析了200多个卸载事件。与手动操作谷物车拖拉机相比,使用RCA的谷物车和联合收割机操作员的应力率分别降低了18% (p = 0.022)和12% (p = 0.18)。RCA减少了拖拉机的横向轨道误差标准偏差2.5厘米的直线通过(p
{"title":"An Automated On-The-Go Unloading System Reduces Harvest Operator Stress Relative to Manual Operation.","authors":"Travis A Burgers, Kusha Kamarei, Mukund Vora, Matthew Horne","doi":"10.13031/jash.15992","DOIUrl":"10.13031/jash.15992","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Stress was measured in harvest operators who performed on-the-go unloading manually and with an automated system. Automated unloading reduced the average grain cart and combine operator stress rate by 18% and 12%, respectively, compared to manual operation. Harvest operators usually worked more than 9 hours and often worked more than 12hours per workday during harvest. The use of automated unloading systems could positively affect the health of harvest operators.</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>On-the-go unloading improves harvest operational efficiency, but it requires skilled labor because it is challenging and stressful to balance numerous concurrent tasks. Harvest automation reduces workload, stress, and fatigue. The objective of this study was to determine if using a commercially available, automated on-the-go unloading system (Raven Cart Automation<sup>TM</sup>, RCA, Raven Industries) would reduce operator stress compared to manual operation. Nine grain cart tractor operators and six combine operators participated in this study. Operators performed their typical harvest operation, except to alternate on-the-go unloading using RCA or operating manually. Skin conductance (electrodermal activity) was measured with an Empatica E4 wristband, and stressful events were quantified. Machine data was collected from the tractor and combine via CAN logs. Over 200 total unload events were analyzed. Grain cart and combine operators using RCA had an 18% (p = 0.022) and 12% (p = 0.18) reduction in stress rate, respectively, compared to operating the grain cart tractor manually. RCA reduced the tractor cross-track error standard deviation by 2.5 cm on straight passes (p < 0.0001). The use of an automated on-the-go unloading system reduces operator stress during harvest and could positively affect the health of operators, especially during the long harvest workdays.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"30 3","pages":"89-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143626392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
AgroGuardian: An All-Terrain Vehicle Crash Detection and Notification System. AgroGuardian:全地形车碰撞检测和通知系统。
IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI: 10.13031/jash.15801
Farzaneh Khorsandi, Guilherme De Moura Araujo, Fernando Ferreira Lima Dos Santos

Highlights: Off-road ATV incidents can be problematic due to long EMS alert times. An ATV crash-detection-and-report system is expected to reduce EMS response time. The developed system can accurately detect ATV rollovers. The alert time of our system is 10 times faster than the national U.S. average. Any rider using our system is 3 times more likely to survive an off-road crash.

Abstract: All-Terrain Vehicle (ATV) incidents are a common cause of injury and death in the agricultural industry in the United States. Many ATV off-road crashes on farms and ranches may result in trauma requiring immediate care, but the injured rider is unable to seek help due to their injuries. Moreover, many of these crashes occur in isolated areas that may be difficult to access and have unreliable cellular phone service, making contact with emergency medical services (EMS) challenging. This study aimed at developing and testing a low-cost ATV crash detection device (AgroGuardian) that immediately alerts EMS and emergency contacts, even when the rider is unable to take action and/or there is no cellular phone service available. AgroGuardian includes an embedded data logging system, a smartphone application, and a remote database. The embedded system includes an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) for attitude estimation, a Global Positioning System (GPS) for location estimation, and a Rock7 modem for off-board communication. A smartphone application was developed for the users to input information about their vehicle (e.g., make and model) and emergency contacts. Also, it allows them to interact with their ATV data. An emergency signal along with the ATV's coordinates is transmitted through the Rock7 modem and received in the remote database when a rollover is detected by the system. This emergency signal is then processed and sent to EMS and emergency contacts. Our results indicated that the device: (1) is unlikely to miss an ATV rollover; (2) has a fast EMS notification time (40.7 s); and (3) the ATV localization system presented an average error of 2.34 m.

重点:由于EMS警报时间过长,越野亚视事故可能会出现问题。ATV碰撞检测和报告系统有望减少EMS的响应时间。所开发的系统可以准确检测ATV的侧翻。我们系统的警报时间比美国全国平均水平快10倍。任何使用我们系统的车手在越野撞车事故中生还的可能性都要高出三倍。摘要:全地形车(ATV)事故是美国农业中常见的伤害和死亡原因。许多在农场和牧场发生的ATV越野碰撞可能会导致需要立即治疗的创伤,但受伤的骑手由于受伤而无法寻求帮助。此外,许多此类事故发生在可能难以进入且移动电话服务不可靠的偏远地区,因此很难与紧急医疗服务(EMS)取得联系。这项研究旨在开发和测试一种低成本的ATV碰撞检测设备(AgroGuardian),即使在乘客无法采取行动和/或没有可用的移动电话服务时,也能立即向EMS和紧急联系人发出警报。AgroGuardian包括一个嵌入式数据记录系统、一个智能手机应用程序和一个远程数据库。嵌入式系统包括用于姿态估计的惯性测量单元(IMU)、用于位置估计的全球定位系统(GPS)和用于板外通信的Rock7调制解调器。开发了一个智能手机应用程序,供用户输入有关其车辆的信息(例如,品牌和型号)和紧急联系人。此外,它还允许他们与他们的ATV数据进行交互。当系统检测到车辆发生侧翻时,会通过Rock7调制解调器发送紧急信号和ATV的坐标,并在远程数据库中接收。然后处理此紧急信号并将其发送给EMS和紧急联系人。我们的研究结果表明,该装置:(1)不太可能错过ATV翻车;(2) EMS通知时间快(40.7 s);(3) ATV定位系统平均误差为2.34 m。
{"title":"AgroGuardian: An All-Terrain Vehicle Crash Detection and Notification System.","authors":"Farzaneh Khorsandi, Guilherme De Moura Araujo, Fernando Ferreira Lima Dos Santos","doi":"10.13031/jash.15801","DOIUrl":"10.13031/jash.15801","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Off-road ATV incidents can be problematic due to long EMS alert times. An ATV crash-detection-and-report system is expected to reduce EMS response time. The developed system can accurately detect ATV rollovers. The alert time of our system is 10 times faster than the national U.S. average. Any rider using our system is 3 times more likely to survive an off-road crash.</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>All-Terrain Vehicle (ATV) incidents are a common cause of injury and death in the agricultural industry in the United States. Many ATV off-road crashes on farms and ranches may result in trauma requiring immediate care, but the injured rider is unable to seek help due to their injuries. Moreover, many of these crashes occur in isolated areas that may be difficult to access and have unreliable cellular phone service, making contact with emergency medical services (EMS) challenging. This study aimed at developing and testing a low-cost ATV crash detection device (AgroGuardian) that immediately alerts EMS and emergency contacts, even when the rider is unable to take action and/or there is no cellular phone service available. AgroGuardian includes an embedded data logging system, a smartphone application, and a remote database. The embedded system includes an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) for attitude estimation, a Global Positioning System (GPS) for location estimation, and a Rock7 modem for off-board communication. A smartphone application was developed for the users to input information about their vehicle (e.g., make and model) and emergency contacts. Also, it allows them to interact with their ATV data. An emergency signal along with the ATV's coordinates is transmitted through the Rock7 modem and received in the remote database when a rollover is detected by the system. This emergency signal is then processed and sent to EMS and emergency contacts. Our results indicated that the device: (1) is unlikely to miss an ATV rollover; (2) has a fast EMS notification time (40.7 s); and (3) the ATV localization system presented an average error of 2.34 m.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"30 2","pages":"53-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143626362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Geospatial Agricultural Incident Analysis for the State of Indiana. 印第安纳州农业事件的地理空间分析。
IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI: 10.13031/jash.15919
Aaron James Etienne, Noah Joel Haslett, William E Field

Highlights: 29 recent agricultural-related fatalities or injuries occurring throughout the state of Indiana were analyzed using geospatial incident analysis. Proximity of each incident to nearby cellular towers was found through 5 and 10-mile spatial joins by their relationship with cellular towers, with no towers most likely to be found within 5 miles of a given incident and only one tower to be found within 10 miles of a given incident. Proximity of each incident to emergency services and the nearest hospital was performed through 5 and 10-mile spatial joins, with only one service provider most likely to be within the five-mile range of a given incident.

Abstract: A total of 29 recent agricultural-related injuries and fatalities throughout the state of Indiana were identified and analyzed for their proximity to cellular towers and emergency medical services (EMS). The objective of this research was to identify relationships between selected agricultural incidents and the ability of the victim to successfully contact emergency services. The geographic information system (GIS) software ArcGIS Pro and ArcGIS Online were utilized for trend identification and analysis. Findings from this analysis showed that only one EMS provider was most likely to be found within five miles of a given incident location. This frequency increased to seven EMS providers when the proximity range was increased to ten miles of a given incident location. The analysis also showed that only one cellular tower was most likely to be within a 10-mile radius of a given incident. There were frequently no accessible towers within five miles of a given incident. In addition, identified incidents were overlaid on a digital elevation map (DEM) of Indiana for analysis on the relationship between elevation and the number of accessible cell towers in the area. Studies have confirmed that victims of serious agricultural-related injuries, especially while working alone, face significant barriers in alerting EMS of their need for assistance. Geospatial analysis techniques performed in this study can be utilized by other states to assess access to EMS and for larger-scale, agricultural incident analysis. These tools have the potential to improve detail in agricultural incident reporting.

亮点:使用地理空间事件分析分析了最近发生在印第安纳州的29起与农业有关的死亡或受伤事件。通过5英里和10英里的空间连接可以发现每个事件与附近的信号塔的接近程度,在给定事件的5英里内最有可能没有信号塔,在给定事件的10英里内只有一个信号塔。通过5英里和10英里的空间连接来实现每个事件与紧急服务和最近医院的接近,只有一个服务提供商最有可能在给定事件的5英里范围内。摘要:我们对印第安纳州最近发生的29起与农业相关的伤亡事件进行了识别和分析,因为它们靠近手机信号塔和紧急医疗服务中心(EMS)。这项研究的目的是确定选定的农业事件与受害者成功联系紧急服务的能力之间的关系。利用地理信息系统(GIS)软件ArcGIS Pro和ArcGIS Online进行趋势识别和分析。分析结果显示,在给定事故地点的5英里范围内,只有一家EMS供应商最有可能被找到。当距离事故地点的距离增加到10英里时,这个频率增加到7个EMS供应商。分析还显示,在给定事件的10英里半径内,最有可能只有一个手机信号塔。在事故发生的5英里范围内,通常没有可到达的信号塔。此外,确定的事件被叠加在印第安纳州的数字高程图(DEM)上,以分析海拔与该地区可访问的蜂窝塔数量之间的关系。研究证实,与农业有关的严重伤害的受害者,特别是在独自工作时,在向紧急医疗服务系统发出援助需求警报方面面临重大障碍。本研究中使用的地理空间分析技术可以被其他国家用来评估EMS的获取情况,并用于更大规模的农业事件分析。这些工具有可能改善农业事件报告的细节。
{"title":"Geospatial Agricultural Incident Analysis for the State of Indiana.","authors":"Aaron James Etienne, Noah Joel Haslett, William E Field","doi":"10.13031/jash.15919","DOIUrl":"10.13031/jash.15919","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Highlights: </strong>29 recent agricultural-related fatalities or injuries occurring throughout the state of Indiana were analyzed using geospatial incident analysis. Proximity of each incident to nearby cellular towers was found through 5 and 10-mile spatial joins by their relationship with cellular towers, with no towers most likely to be found within 5 miles of a given incident and only one tower to be found within 10 miles of a given incident. Proximity of each incident to emergency services and the nearest hospital was performed through 5 and 10-mile spatial joins, with only one service provider most likely to be within the five-mile range of a given incident.</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>A total of 29 recent agricultural-related injuries and fatalities throughout the state of Indiana were identified and analyzed for their proximity to cellular towers and emergency medical services (EMS). The objective of this research was to identify relationships between selected agricultural incidents and the ability of the victim to successfully contact emergency services. The geographic information system (GIS) software ArcGIS Pro and ArcGIS Online were utilized for trend identification and analysis. Findings from this analysis showed that only one EMS provider was most likely to be found within five miles of a given incident location. This frequency increased to seven EMS providers when the proximity range was increased to ten miles of a given incident location. The analysis also showed that only one cellular tower was most likely to be within a 10-mile radius of a given incident. There were frequently no accessible towers within five miles of a given incident. In addition, identified incidents were overlaid on a digital elevation map (DEM) of Indiana for analysis on the relationship between elevation and the number of accessible cell towers in the area. Studies have confirmed that victims of serious agricultural-related injuries, especially while working alone, face significant barriers in alerting EMS of their need for assistance. Geospatial analysis techniques performed in this study can be utilized by other states to assess access to EMS and for larger-scale, agricultural incident analysis. These tools have the potential to improve detail in agricultural incident reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"30 2","pages":"75-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143626366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identification of Advantages and Limitations of Current Risk Assessment and Hazard Analysis Methods when Applied on Autonomous Agricultural Machineries. 当前风险评估与危害分析方法在自主农业机械上应用的优势与局限性
IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI: 10.13031/jash.15873
Guy R Aby, Salah F Issa, John F Reid, Cheryl Beseler, John M Shutske
<p><strong>Highlights: </strong>The three main types of risk assessment and hazard analysis techniques applied on autonomous agricultural machines are: (1) Informal Group Analysis; (2) Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA); and (3) Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). Replicability is the main advantage of FMEA and HARA, while cost effectiveness is the main advantage of Informal Group Analysis. Subjectivity and the requirement for prior knowledge (data) are the main weaknesses of FMEA, HARA, and Informal Group Analysis when applied to novel and revolutionary autonomous agricultural machines.</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>In the last ten years, the development of automated agricultural machinery has seen noteworthy advancements. Nevertheless, the successful commercialization of these technologies depends critically on their ability to operate safely. This study evaluated the advantages and limitations of current risk assessment and hazard analysis methods currently used to ensure the safety of autonomous agricultural machines. An online survey containing 18 questions was distributed to 711 participants identified as potential individuals who are currently working or have worked on autonomous agricultural machines to determine the type and frequency of risk assessment and hazard analysis methods applied on autonomous agricultural machines, examine the advantages and limitations of each method, and investigate the perceived effectiveness of each method. Frequency analysis was used to determine the most and least utilized risk assessment and hazard analysis methods. The advantages and limitations of each risk assessment and hazard analysis approach were compared. Descriptive statistics (counts, means, medians, percent) and frequency analysis of the variables were used. The three main types of risk assessment and hazard analysis techniques applied to autonomous agricultural machines. The methods are (a) Informal Group Analysis (e.g., Brainstorming), (b) Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA), and (c) Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). Replicability is perceived as the main advantage of FMEA and HARA, while cost-effectiveness is the main advantage of Informal Group Analysis. The need to have pre-existing data of the autonomous agricultural machine at hand to be able to perform risk assessment and subjectivity are the main limitations of FMEA, HARA, and Informal Group Analysis dealing with novel and revolutionary autonomous agricultural machines. Industry experts do not believe that the risk assessment and hazard analysis procedures now used are reliable and efficient enough to guarantee the safety of autonomous agricultural tractors. This study reveals important information about the current state of risk assessment and hazard analysis methods in the context of autonomous agricultural machinery. This knowledge can inform future research, policy development, and industry practices to ensure the safety of autonomous agricultural m
重点:应用于自主农业机械的风险评估和危害分析技术主要有三种类型:(1)非正式群体分析;(2)危害分析与风险评估(HARA);(3)失效模式与影响分析(FMEA)。可复制性是FMEA和HARA的主要优势,而成本效益是非正式群体分析的主要优势。主观性和对先验知识(数据)的要求是FMEA、HARA和非正式群体分析在应用于新型和革命性的自主农业机械时的主要弱点。摘要:近十年来,自动化农业机械的发展取得了显著的进步。然而,这些技术的成功商业化关键取决于它们安全运行的能力。本研究评估了目前用于确保自主农业机械安全的风险评估和危害分析方法的优点和局限性。一项包含18个问题的在线调查向711名被确定为目前或曾经从事自主农业机械工作的潜在个人的参与者分发,以确定应用于自主农业机械的风险评估和危害分析方法的类型和频率,检查每种方法的优点和局限性,并调查每种方法的感知有效性。使用频率分析确定使用最多和最少的风险评估和危害分析方法。比较了各种风险评价和危害分析方法的优缺点。采用描述性统计(计数、平均值、中位数、百分比)和变量频率分析。三种主要类型的风险评估和危害分析技术应用于自主农业机械。方法是(a)非正式小组分析(例如,头脑风暴),(b)危害分析和风险评估(HARA),以及(c)失效模式和影响分析(FMEA)。可复制性被认为是FMEA和HARA的主要优势,而成本效益是非正式群体分析的主要优势。需要拥有现有的自主农业机械数据,以便能够进行风险评估和主观性,这是FMEA、HARA和非正式群体分析处理新型和革命性自主农业机械的主要限制。业内专家认为,目前使用的风险评估和危害分析程序不够可靠和有效,无法保证自动农用拖拉机的安全。本研究揭示了自主农业机械环境下风险评估和危害分析方法的现状。这些知识可以为未来的研究、政策制定和行业实践提供信息,以确保自主农业机械的安全。
{"title":"Identification of Advantages and Limitations of Current Risk Assessment and Hazard Analysis Methods when Applied on Autonomous Agricultural Machineries.","authors":"Guy R Aby, Salah F Issa, John F Reid, Cheryl Beseler, John M Shutske","doi":"10.13031/jash.15873","DOIUrl":"10.13031/jash.15873","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights: &lt;/strong&gt;The three main types of risk assessment and hazard analysis techniques applied on autonomous agricultural machines are: (1) Informal Group Analysis; (2) Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA); and (3) Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). Replicability is the main advantage of FMEA and HARA, while cost effectiveness is the main advantage of Informal Group Analysis. Subjectivity and the requirement for prior knowledge (data) are the main weaknesses of FMEA, HARA, and Informal Group Analysis when applied to novel and revolutionary autonomous agricultural machines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Abstract: &lt;/strong&gt;In the last ten years, the development of automated agricultural machinery has seen noteworthy advancements. Nevertheless, the successful commercialization of these technologies depends critically on their ability to operate safely. This study evaluated the advantages and limitations of current risk assessment and hazard analysis methods currently used to ensure the safety of autonomous agricultural machines. An online survey containing 18 questions was distributed to 711 participants identified as potential individuals who are currently working or have worked on autonomous agricultural machines to determine the type and frequency of risk assessment and hazard analysis methods applied on autonomous agricultural machines, examine the advantages and limitations of each method, and investigate the perceived effectiveness of each method. Frequency analysis was used to determine the most and least utilized risk assessment and hazard analysis methods. The advantages and limitations of each risk assessment and hazard analysis approach were compared. Descriptive statistics (counts, means, medians, percent) and frequency analysis of the variables were used. The three main types of risk assessment and hazard analysis techniques applied to autonomous agricultural machines. The methods are (a) Informal Group Analysis (e.g., Brainstorming), (b) Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA), and (c) Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). Replicability is perceived as the main advantage of FMEA and HARA, while cost-effectiveness is the main advantage of Informal Group Analysis. The need to have pre-existing data of the autonomous agricultural machine at hand to be able to perform risk assessment and subjectivity are the main limitations of FMEA, HARA, and Informal Group Analysis dealing with novel and revolutionary autonomous agricultural machines. Industry experts do not believe that the risk assessment and hazard analysis procedures now used are reliable and efficient enough to guarantee the safety of autonomous agricultural tractors. This study reveals important information about the current state of risk assessment and hazard analysis methods in the context of autonomous agricultural machinery. This knowledge can inform future research, policy development, and industry practices to ensure the safety of autonomous agricultural m","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"30 2","pages":"35-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143626378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety Risk Assessment of an Autonomous Agricultural Machine. 自主农业机械的安全风险评估。
IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-02-06 DOI: 10.13031/jash.15756
Guy Roger Aby, Salah F Issa, Girish Chowdhary

Highlights: The safety guidelines outlined in ISO 18497 are not sufficient to guarantee the safe operation of autonomous agricultural machines. Since the risk assessment techniques specified in ISO 12100:2012 require historical failure data of the machine at hand, they cannot be used to effectively mitigate the risk associated with autonomous agricultural machines where such data are not readily available. Analysis from the perspective of ergonomics can potentially increase the safety of autonomous agricultural machines.

Abstract: The goal of this study was to analyze the safety implications of an autonomous agricultural machine (TerraPreta) using the standards ISO 18497 (ISO, 2018) and ISO 12100:2012 (ISO, 2012), as well as to investigate the ergonomics associated with the use of the autonomous agricultural machine. First, three engineers involved in the robot's manufacturing process were asked to evaluate the robot's functionalities compliance with the applicable safety standards and protective measures outlined in standard ISO 18497 (ISO, 2018). Second, while the robot was planting cover crop seeds, an attempt was made to identify and evaluate every risk connected to the robot using the risk assessment techniques outlined in ISO 12100:2012 (ISO, 2012). (1) Half (50%) of the functionalities of the autonomous agricultural machine complied with the safety requirements and protective measures described within the standard ISO 18497 (ISO, 2018). (2) The heavy reliance on past incident data of the risk assessment procedure described within the standard ISO 12100:2012 (ISO, 2012) makes it ineffective for new and revolutionary technologies such as autonomous agricultural machines where such data are not available. (3) Lifting a bag to fill the robot hopper with seeds was found to be a moderately hazardous activity associated with human-robot interaction. Multiple tentative solutions were provided to avoid this moderately hazardous activity.

重点:ISO 18497中概述的安全指南不足以保证自主农业机械的安全运行。由于ISO 12100:2012中规定的风险评估技术需要手头机器的历史故障数据,因此它们不能用于有效降低与自动农业机械相关的风险,因为这些数据不易获得。从人体工程学的角度进行分析,可以潜在地提高自主农业机械的安全性。摘要:本研究的目的是使用ISO 18497 (ISO, 2018)和ISO 12100:2012 (ISO, 2012)标准分析自主农业机械(TerraPreta)的安全影响,并调查与自主农业机械使用相关的人体工程学。首先,参与机器人制造过程的三名工程师被要求评估机器人的功能是否符合ISO 18497标准(ISO, 2018)中概述的适用安全标准和保护措施。其次,当机器人种植覆盖作物种子时,尝试使用ISO 12100:2012 (ISO, 2012)中概述的风险评估技术来识别和评估与机器人相关的每一个风险。(1)自主农业机械的一半(50%)功能符合标准ISO 18497 (ISO, 2018)中描述的安全要求和保护措施。(2)标准ISO 12100:2012 (ISO, 2012)中描述的风险评估程序严重依赖过去的事件数据,这使得它对新的和革命性的技术(如无法获得此类数据的自主农业机械)无效。(3)提起袋子向机器人料斗中装满种子被认为是与人机交互相关的中度危险活动。提供了多种暂定解决方案以避免这种中度危险的活动。
{"title":"Safety Risk Assessment of an Autonomous Agricultural Machine.","authors":"Guy Roger Aby, Salah F Issa, Girish Chowdhary","doi":"10.13031/jash.15756","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.15756","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Highlights: </strong>The safety guidelines outlined in ISO 18497 are not sufficient to guarantee the safe operation of autonomous agricultural machines. Since the risk assessment techniques specified in ISO 12100:2012 require historical failure data of the machine at hand, they cannot be used to effectively mitigate the risk associated with autonomous agricultural machines where such data are not readily available. Analysis from the perspective of ergonomics can potentially increase the safety of autonomous agricultural machines.</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The goal of this study was to analyze the safety implications of an autonomous agricultural machine (TerraPreta) using the standards ISO 18497 (ISO, 2018) and ISO 12100:2012 (ISO, 2012), as well as to investigate the ergonomics associated with the use of the autonomous agricultural machine. First, three engineers involved in the robot's manufacturing process were asked to evaluate the robot's functionalities compliance with the applicable safety standards and protective measures outlined in standard ISO 18497 (ISO, 2018). Second, while the robot was planting cover crop seeds, an attempt was made to identify and evaluate every risk connected to the robot using the risk assessment techniques outlined in ISO 12100:2012 (ISO, 2012). (1) Half (50%) of the functionalities of the autonomous agricultural machine complied with the safety requirements and protective measures described within the standard ISO 18497 (ISO, 2018). (2) The heavy reliance on past incident data of the risk assessment procedure described within the standard ISO 12100:2012 (ISO, 2012) makes it ineffective for new and revolutionary technologies such as autonomous agricultural machines where such data are not available. (3) Lifting a bag to fill the robot hopper with seeds was found to be a moderately hazardous activity associated with human-robot interaction. Multiple tentative solutions were provided to avoid this moderately hazardous activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"30 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143626358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1