首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health最新文献

英文 中文
Utilization and Effectiveness of Harnesses and Lifelines in Grain Entrapment Incidents: Preliminary Analysis. 粮食诱捕事故中安全带和救生索的利用与有效性:初步分析。
IF 1 Pub Date : 2018-05-07 DOI: 10.13031/jash.12170
Salah F Issa, Mahmoud M Nour, William E Field

No previous studies have been found that document the level of use or validate the effectiveness of safety harnesses and lifelines in the prevention of or extrication from grain entrapments or engulfments. This article addresses that void via analysis of the data contained in the Purdue Agricultural Confined Space Incident Database. A total of 1,147 cases involving entrapments or engulfments in grain masses were mined for terms that might indicate the use of a safety harness, lifeline, fall restraint system, rope, or outside observer. Case information ranged from brief news accounts to comprehensive investigation results. The review turned up 38 incidents (< 5%) in which these safety devices were identified as having been used by either workers or rescuers during access to a storage structure. In 26 of the 38 cases (68%) where safety devices were identified, the entrapment or engulfment resulted in a fatality. The two most common reasons cited for failure of these devices were (1) that the lifeline or rope was too long (17 incidents) and (2) that the worker had removed the harness with the attached lifeline while in the structure (6 incidents). It was also determined that these devices, if used improperly, can lead to secondary injuries of the victim. The preliminary evidence suggests that use of these devices alone does not ensure the user's safety and may even provide a false sense of security if used without proper training. It was further found that an approved body harness and safety line provided little or no protection from either entrapment or falls if used in the presence of vertically crusted grain surfaces, without proper anchors, or not in conjunction with outside observers. The presented results are important for safety professionals to consider as they endeavor to reduce the risk of grain entrapment and engulfment incidents through training, education, selection of personal protective equipment, etc., and should contribute to the development of new structural standards for grain bins. It is the intent of this article to elucidate the importance of training and proper use of these safety devices.

以前没有发现任何研究记录使用水平或验证安全安全带和救生索在防止或从谷物捕获或吞噬中解脱的有效性。本文通过分析普渡农业密闭空间事件数据库中的数据来解决这一问题。总共有1147个涉及谷物团块的陷阱或吞没的案例被挖掘出来,这些案例可能表明使用了安全带、生命线、坠落约束系统、绳索或外部观察者。案件信息从简短的新闻报道到全面的调查结果不等。审查发现了38起事故(< 5%),在这些事故中,工人或救援人员在进入存储结构时使用了这些安全装置。在确定了安全装置的38个案例中,有26个(68%)被困或吞没导致死亡。这些设备失败的两个最常见的原因是:(1)救生索或绳索太长(17起事故)和(2)工人在结构中拆除了带有救生索的线束(6起事故)。还确定,如果使用不当,这些装置可能导致受害者的二次伤害。初步证据表明,单独使用这些设备并不能确保用户的安全,如果未经适当培训使用,甚至可能产生一种虚假的安全感。进一步发现,如果在垂直结壳的谷物表面使用,没有适当的锚点,或者没有与外界观察者一起使用,经批准的身体安全带和安全线几乎没有或根本没有提供防止被困或坠落的保护。本文的研究结果对安全专业人员通过培训、教育、个人防护装备的选择等努力降低粮食被困和吞没事件的风险具有重要意义,并应有助于制定新的粮食仓结构标准。本文的目的是阐明培训和正确使用这些安全装置的重要性。
{"title":"Utilization and Effectiveness of Harnesses and Lifelines in Grain Entrapment Incidents: Preliminary Analysis.","authors":"Salah F Issa,&nbsp;Mahmoud M Nour,&nbsp;William E Field","doi":"10.13031/jash.12170","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.12170","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>No previous studies have been found that document the level of use or validate the effectiveness of safety harnesses and lifelines in the prevention of or extrication from grain entrapments or engulfments. This article addresses that void via analysis of the data contained in the Purdue Agricultural Confined Space Incident Database. A total of 1,147 cases involving entrapments or engulfments in grain masses were mined for terms that might indicate the use of a safety harness, lifeline, fall restraint system, rope, or outside observer. Case information ranged from brief news accounts to comprehensive investigation results. The review turned up 38 incidents (< 5%) in which these safety devices were identified as having been used by either workers or rescuers during access to a storage structure. In 26 of the 38 cases (68%) where safety devices were identified, the entrapment or engulfment resulted in a fatality. The two most common reasons cited for failure of these devices were (1) that the lifeline or rope was too long (17 incidents) and (2) that the worker had removed the harness with the attached lifeline while in the structure (6 incidents). It was also determined that these devices, if used improperly, can lead to secondary injuries of the victim. The preliminary evidence suggests that use of these devices alone does not ensure the user's safety and may even provide a false sense of security if used without proper training. It was further found that an approved body harness and safety line provided little or no protection from either entrapment or falls if used in the presence of vertically crusted grain surfaces, without proper anchors, or not in conjunction with outside observers. The presented results are important for safety professionals to consider as they endeavor to reduce the risk of grain entrapment and engulfment incidents through training, education, selection of personal protective equipment, etc., and should contribute to the development of new structural standards for grain bins. It is the intent of this article to elucidate the importance of training and proper use of these safety devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.13031/jash.12170","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36117829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Summary of U.S. Injuries and Fatalities Involving Entrapment and Suffocation in Grain Transport Vehicles. 美国谷物运输车辆中涉及诱捕和窒息的伤亡情况摘要。
IF 1 Pub Date : 2018-05-07 DOI: 10.13031/jash.12479
Yuan-Hsin Cheng, William E Field, Salah F Issa, Kevin Kelley, Matthew Heber, Robert Turner

Since 1978, the Purdue University Agricultural Safety and Health Program has managed a surveillance effort and database to collect information on documented injuries and fatalities in all forms of U.S. agricultural confined spaces. The database currently contains 1,968 cases documented in the U.S. between 1964 and 2016. Of these cases, 174 (8.8%) involved entrapment or suffocation in grain transport vehicles (GTVs), including gravity-flow wagons, semi-truck trailers, and other agricultural transport vehicles that have limited access and are not considered normal work spaces or are classified as confined spaces. These GTV cases represent the overwhelming majority of documented cases involving all forms of agricultural transport vehicles, including forage and manure transport vehicles. Of the incidents documented, 64.3% resulted in fatalities and 71.8% involved children and youth age 20 years and under, when the age was determined. For the GTV cases, the typical victim was male (88.5%), and the average age of the victim was 19.9 (median 12), with over 63.5% of the cases involving children under the age of 15. In numerous incidents, more than one victim became entrapped, including one incident involving five victims. The number of documented cases decreased sharply from a peak of approximately 7 cases per year in the early 1990s to an average of 3.1 cases per year over the past two decades, with no cases documented in 1998 and 2013. However, there is a linear increase in the frequency of incidents since the first case was documented in 1964. This trend is partially due to peaks in 2011 and 2014, when 10 and 9 cases, respectively, were documented, along with more vigilant surveillance methods due to online search capabilities. The general decline, more recently, in the annual number of cases is attributed to increased awareness of the hazards to youth during transport in GTVs, increased use of warnings on GTVs, and the increased size of GTVs, which makes human access more difficult and less practical. Efforts over the past decade to bring attention to the risk of entrapment in GTVs should be recognized as a success of the educational and technological strategies initiated due to earlier high-profile incidents. However, with 6, 10, 9, and 4 cases documented in 2010, 2011, 2014, and 2016, respectively, continued efforts to address the problem are justified. Recommendations for future actions include development of a safety standard for GTVs that includes placement of safety messages on all new GTVs, use of windows above outlets, retrofitting older GTVs with appropriate warnings, and continuing to address the hazard with safety resources targeting all workers exposed to grain handling and transport.

自1978年以来,普渡大学农业安全与健康项目管理了一项监测工作和数据库,以收集美国所有形式的农业密闭空间中记录在案的伤害和死亡信息。该数据库目前包含1964年至2016年期间美国记录的1968例病例。在这些案件中,174起(8.8%)涉及在粮食运输车辆(gtv)中被困或窒息,包括重力流货车、半卡车拖车和其他进出受限、不被视为正常工作空间或被归类为密闭空间的农业运输车辆。这些GTV病例占所有形式的农业运输车辆(包括饲料和粪肥运输车辆)所记录病例的绝大多数。在记录在案的事件中,64.3%导致死亡,71.8%涉及年龄确定时为20岁及以下的儿童和青年。在GTV案件中,典型的受害者为男性(88.5%),受害者的平均年龄为19.9岁(中位数为12岁),超过63.5%的案件涉及15岁以下的儿童。在许多事件中,不止一名受害者陷入困境,其中一次事件涉及五名受害者。记录在案的病例数量从20世纪90年代初每年约7例的峰值急剧下降到过去20年的平均每年3.1例,1998年和2013年没有记录在案的病例。然而,自1964年记录第一例病例以来,事件发生的频率呈线性增加。这一趋势部分是由于2011年和2014年的高峰,分别记录了10例和9例,以及由于在线搜索功能而更加警惕的监视方法。近年来,年度病例数普遍下降的原因是,人们越来越认识到青少年在使用电动汽车运输过程中所面临的危险,在电动汽车上更多地使用警语,以及电动汽车的规模扩大,这使得人类获得电动汽车变得更加困难和不那么实用。过去十年中为引起人们对被诱捕的危险的注意所作的努力,应被认为是由于早期引人注目的事件而发起的教育和技术战略的成功。然而,2010年、2011年、2014年和2016年分别记录了6起、10起、9起和4起案件,因此继续努力解决这一问题是合理的。对未来行动的建议包括制定粮食运输安全标准,其中包括在所有新的粮食运输安全设备上放置安全信息,在出口上方使用窗户,对旧的粮食运输安全设备进行改造并加贴适当的警告,并继续针对所有接触粮食装卸和运输的工人提供安全资源来解决危险。
{"title":"Summary of U.S. Injuries and Fatalities Involving Entrapment and Suffocation in Grain Transport Vehicles.","authors":"Yuan-Hsin Cheng,&nbsp;William E Field,&nbsp;Salah F Issa,&nbsp;Kevin Kelley,&nbsp;Matthew Heber,&nbsp;Robert Turner","doi":"10.13031/jash.12479","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.12479","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since 1978, the Purdue University Agricultural Safety and Health Program has managed a surveillance effort and database to collect information on documented injuries and fatalities in all forms of U.S. agricultural confined spaces. The database currently contains 1,968 cases documented in the U.S. between 1964 and 2016. Of these cases, 174 (8.8%) involved entrapment or suffocation in grain transport vehicles (GTVs), including gravity-flow wagons, semi-truck trailers, and other agricultural transport vehicles that have limited access and are not considered normal work spaces or are classified as confined spaces. These GTV cases represent the overwhelming majority of documented cases involving all forms of agricultural transport vehicles, including forage and manure transport vehicles. Of the incidents documented, 64.3% resulted in fatalities and 71.8% involved children and youth age 20 years and under, when the age was determined. For the GTV cases, the typical victim was male (88.5%), and the average age of the victim was 19.9 (median 12), with over 63.5% of the cases involving children under the age of 15. In numerous incidents, more than one victim became entrapped, including one incident involving five victims. The number of documented cases decreased sharply from a peak of approximately 7 cases per year in the early 1990s to an average of 3.1 cases per year over the past two decades, with no cases documented in 1998 and 2013. However, there is a linear increase in the frequency of incidents since the first case was documented in 1964. This trend is partially due to peaks in 2011 and 2014, when 10 and 9 cases, respectively, were documented, along with more vigilant surveillance methods due to online search capabilities. The general decline, more recently, in the annual number of cases is attributed to increased awareness of the hazards to youth during transport in GTVs, increased use of warnings on GTVs, and the increased size of GTVs, which makes human access more difficult and less practical. Efforts over the past decade to bring attention to the risk of entrapment in GTVs should be recognized as a success of the educational and technological strategies initiated due to earlier high-profile incidents. However, with 6, 10, 9, and 4 cases documented in 2010, 2011, 2014, and 2016, respectively, continued efforts to address the problem are justified. Recommendations for future actions include development of a safety standard for GTVs that includes placement of safety messages on all new GTVs, use of windows above outlets, retrofitting older GTVs with appropriate warnings, and continuing to address the hazard with safety resources targeting all workers exposed to grain handling and transport.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.13031/jash.12479","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36117749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
ESTIMATING THE COST OF AGRICULTURAL MORBIDITY IN MAINE AND NEW HAMPSHIRE. 估算缅因州和新罕布什尔州农业发病率的成本。
IF 1 Pub Date : 2018-01-29 DOI: 10.13031/jash.12146
Nathan M Jones, Erika E Scott, Nicole Krupa, Paul L Jenkins

This article provides an estimate for the economic costs of agricultural injuries sustained in the states of Maine and New Hampshire between the years 2008 and 2010. The authors used a novel dataset of 562 agriculturally related occupational injuries, and cost estimates were generated using the CDC's Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS). Individual cases from the dataset that did not match the query options for WISQARS were excluded. Of the 562 agricultural injuries identified in the dataset, 361 met the WISQARS criteria. The remaining 201 cases were judged to be incompatible with the WISQARS query criteria. Significant differences (p 0.0001) were found between the median costs of eight types of injury. Amputations (median = $70,077) and fractures (median = $13,365) were found to be the most expensive types of injury. The total cost of the 361 injuries for which estimates were available was $6,342,270. Injuries that reportedly involved machinery were found to be more expensive than injuries caused by animals. This article highlights the difference in the total cost of injury between types of injuries and demonstrates that agricultural injuries were a significant economic burden for Maine and New Hampshire for the years 2008-2010. These data can be used to direct future preventive efforts. Finally, this article suggests that WISQARS is a powerful tool for estimating injury costs without requiring access to treatment or billing records.

本文提供了2008年至2010年间缅因州和新罕布什尔州农业灾害的经济成本估算。作者使用了562个农业相关职业伤害的新数据集,并使用疾病预防控制中心基于网络的伤害统计查询和报告系统(WISQARS)生成了成本估算。排除了数据集中与WISQARS查询选项不匹配的个别病例。在数据集中确定的562起农业伤害中,361起符合WISQARS标准。其余201例被认为不符合WISQARS查询标准。八种损伤的中位成本之间存在显著差异(p 0.0001)。截肢(中位数= 70,077美元)和骨折(中位数= 13,365美元)是最昂贵的伤害类型。已有估计数的361人受伤的总费用为6 342 270美元。据报道,机器造成的伤害比动物造成的伤害更昂贵。这篇文章强调了不同类型伤害的总成本的差异,并证明了农业伤害是2008-2010年缅因州和新罕布什尔州的一个重大经济负担。这些数据可用于指导今后的预防工作。最后,这篇文章表明,WISQARS是一个强大的工具,可以在不需要获得治疗或账单记录的情况下估计伤害成本。
{"title":"ESTIMATING THE COST OF AGRICULTURAL MORBIDITY IN MAINE AND NEW HAMPSHIRE.","authors":"Nathan M Jones,&nbsp;Erika E Scott,&nbsp;Nicole Krupa,&nbsp;Paul L Jenkins","doi":"10.13031/jash.12146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.12146","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article provides an estimate for the economic costs of agricultural injuries sustained in the states of Maine and New Hampshire between the years 2008 and 2010. The authors used a novel dataset of 562 agriculturally related occupational injuries, and cost estimates were generated using the CDC's Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS). Individual cases from the dataset that did not match the query options for WISQARS were excluded. Of the 562 agricultural injuries identified in the dataset, 361 met the WISQARS criteria. The remaining 201 cases were judged to be incompatible with the WISQARS query criteria. Significant differences (p 0.0001) were found between the median costs of eight types of injury. Amputations (median = $70,077) and fractures (median = $13,365) were found to be the most expensive types of injury. The total cost of the 361 injuries for which estimates were available was $6,342,270. Injuries that reportedly involved machinery were found to be more expensive than injuries caused by animals. This article highlights the difference in the total cost of injury between types of injuries and demonstrates that agricultural injuries were a significant economic burden for Maine and New Hampshire for the years 2008-2010. These data can be used to direct future preventive efforts. Finally, this article suggests that WISQARS is a powerful tool for estimating injury costs without requiring access to treatment or billing records.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.13031/jash.12146","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10630566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
EVALUATION OF AGRICULTURAL TRACTOR SEAT COMFORT WITH A NEW PROTOCOL BASED ON PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION ASSESSMENT. 基于压力分布评价的农用拖拉机座椅舒适性评价新方案。
IF 1 Pub Date : 2018-01-29 DOI: 10.13031/jash.12209
Marco Bordignon, Maurizio Cutini, Carlo Bisaglia, Paolo Taboga, Francesco Marcolin

Professional drivers have been found to be at a high risk of developing low back pain due to prolonged sitting and vehicle vibration. In a previous survey carried out on 1,155 tractor drivers, tractor vibration and/or incorrect posture while driving were found to cause low back disorders in more than 80% of the interviewed drivers. In this context, the present research introduces a new evaluation protocol to assess the ergonomic characteristics of agricultural tractor seats through the use of pressure sensors, taking into account both static and dynamic conditions. The degree of comfort was defined by analyzing the pressure distribution exerted by a sample of 12 drivers sitting on two seats in five different operating conditions. The pressure distribution values thus obtained were compared with the corresponding pressures recorded with the 12 drivers sitting on a reference seat (rigid seat, backrest, and suspension) designed for the purpose. From the comparison, it was possible to define a comfort index (CI) that allowed an objective assessment of the two seats. Statistical analysis showed that the CIs of the two seats were significantly different in all five operating conditions. Moreover, the two seats showed different CIs as a function of the operating condition. Although less comfortable, one seat showed almost constant CI values in all five operating conditions. Conversely, the other seat showed a progressively decreasing CI from the static condition to the uneven ground condition.

由于长时间坐着和车辆震动,职业司机患腰痛的风险很高。在之前对1155名拖拉机司机进行的一项调查中,超过80%的受访司机被发现在驾驶时拖拉机振动和/或不正确的姿势导致腰背部疾病。在此背景下,本研究引入了一种新的评估方案,通过使用压力传感器来评估农业拖拉机座椅的人体工程学特性,同时考虑静态和动态条件。通过分析12名坐在两个座位上的司机在5种不同操作条件下所施加的压力分布,确定了舒适程度。将获得的压力分布值与12名驾驶员坐在专门设计的参考座椅(刚性座椅、靠背和悬架)上记录的相应压力进行比较。从比较中,可以定义一个舒适指数(CI),允许对两个座位进行客观评估。统计分析表明,在所有五种工况下,两个座位的ci均有显著差异。此外,两个座位表现出不同的ci作为操作条件的函数。尽管不太舒适,但一个座位在所有五种操作条件下的CI值几乎不变。相反,另一个座位的CI从静态状态到不平整的地面状态逐渐降低。
{"title":"EVALUATION OF AGRICULTURAL TRACTOR SEAT COMFORT WITH A NEW PROTOCOL BASED ON PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION ASSESSMENT.","authors":"Marco Bordignon,&nbsp;Maurizio Cutini,&nbsp;Carlo Bisaglia,&nbsp;Paolo Taboga,&nbsp;Francesco Marcolin","doi":"10.13031/jash.12209","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.12209","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Professional drivers have been found to be at a high risk of developing low back pain due to prolonged sitting and vehicle vibration. In a previous survey carried out on 1,155 tractor drivers, tractor vibration and/or incorrect posture while driving were found to cause low back disorders in more than 80% of the interviewed drivers. In this context, the present research introduces a new evaluation protocol to assess the ergonomic characteristics of agricultural tractor seats through the use of pressure sensors, taking into account both static and dynamic conditions. The degree of comfort was defined by analyzing the pressure distribution exerted by a sample of 12 drivers sitting on two seats in five different operating conditions. The pressure distribution values thus obtained were compared with the corresponding pressures recorded with the 12 drivers sitting on a reference seat (rigid seat, backrest, and suspension) designed for the purpose. From the comparison, it was possible to define a comfort index (CI) that allowed an objective assessment of the two seats. Statistical analysis showed that the CIs of the two seats were significantly different in all five operating conditions. Moreover, the two seats showed different CIs as a function of the operating condition. Although less comfortable, one seat showed almost constant CI values in all five operating conditions. Conversely, the other seat showed a progressively decreasing CI from the static condition to the uneven ground condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.13031/jash.12209","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35903857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
MODIFIED PATH METHODOLOGY FOR OBTAINING INTERVAL-SCALED POSTURAL ASSESSMENTS OF FARMWORKERS. 改进的路径方法用于获得农场工人的间隔尺度姿势评估。
IF 1 Pub Date : 2018-01-29 DOI: 10.13031/jash.12453
Emma B Garrison, Jonathan Dropkin, Rebecca Russell, Paul Jenkins

Agricultural workers perform tasks that frequently require awkward and extreme postures that are associated with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). The PATH (Posture, Activity, Tools, Handling) system currently provides a sound methodology for quantifying workers' exposure to these awkward postures on an ordinal scale of measurement, which places restrictions on the choice of analytic methods. This study reports a modification of the PATH methodology that instead captures these postures as degrees of flexion, an interval-scaled measurement. Rather than making live observations in the field, as in PATH, the postural assessments were performed on photographs using ImageJ photo analysis software. Capturing the postures in photographs permitted more careful measurement of the degrees of flexion. The current PATH methodology requires that the observer in the field be trained in the use of PATH, whereas the single photographer used in this modification requires only sufficient training to maintain the proper camera angle. Ultimately, these interval-scale measurements could be combined with other quantitative measures, such as those produced by electromyograms (EMGs), to provide more sophisticated estimates of future risk for MSDs. Further, these data can provide a baseline from which the effects of interventions designed to reduce hazardous postures can be calculated with greater precision.

农业工人执行的任务经常需要笨拙和极端的姿势,这与肌肉骨骼疾病(MSDs)有关。PATH(姿势,活动,工具,操作)系统目前提供了一个合理的方法来量化工人在有序测量尺度上暴露于这些尴尬的姿势,这限制了分析方法的选择。本研究报告了对PATH方法的一种修改,将这些姿势作为屈曲度(一种间隔尺度测量)来捕获。不像在PATH中那样在实地进行现场观察,而是使用ImageJ照片分析软件对照片进行姿势评估。在照片中捕捉姿势可以更仔细地测量弯曲的程度。目前的适视技术方法要求实地观察员接受适视技术使用方面的训练,而这种修改中使用的单个摄影师只需要足够的训练以保持适当的相机角度。最终,这些间隔尺度测量可以与其他定量测量相结合,例如由肌电图(emg)产生的测量,以提供更复杂的msd未来风险估计。此外,这些数据可以提供一个基线,从而可以更精确地计算旨在减少危险姿势的干预措施的效果。
{"title":"MODIFIED PATH METHODOLOGY FOR OBTAINING INTERVAL-SCALED POSTURAL ASSESSMENTS OF FARMWORKERS.","authors":"Emma B Garrison,&nbsp;Jonathan Dropkin,&nbsp;Rebecca Russell,&nbsp;Paul Jenkins","doi":"10.13031/jash.12453","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.12453","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Agricultural workers perform tasks that frequently require awkward and extreme postures that are associated with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). The PATH (Posture, Activity, Tools, Handling) system currently provides a sound methodology for quantifying workers' exposure to these awkward postures on an ordinal scale of measurement, which places restrictions on the choice of analytic methods. This study reports a modification of the PATH methodology that instead captures these postures as degrees of flexion, an interval-scaled measurement. Rather than making live observations in the field, as in PATH, the postural assessments were performed on photographs using ImageJ photo analysis software. Capturing the postures in photographs permitted more careful measurement of the degrees of flexion. The current PATH methodology requires that the observer in the field be trained in the use of PATH, whereas the single photographer used in this modification requires only sufficient training to maintain the proper camera angle. Ultimately, these interval-scale measurements could be combined with other quantitative measures, such as those produced by electromyograms (EMGs), to provide more sophisticated estimates of future risk for MSDs. Further, these data can provide a baseline from which the effects of interventions designed to reduce hazardous postures can be calculated with greater precision.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.13031/jash.12453","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10519952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF INDIVIDUAL ELEMENTS OF THE INTERFACE FOR AN AGRICULTURAL MACHINE. 农业机械界面各部件的设计与评价。
IF 1 Pub Date : 2018-01-29 DOI: 10.13031/jash.12410
Aadesh K Rakhra, Danny D Mann

If a user-centered approach is not used to design information displays, the quantity and quality of information presented to the user may not match the needs of the user, or it may exceed the capability of the human operator for processing and using that information. The result may be an excessive mental workload and reduced situation awareness of the operator, which can negatively affect the machine performance and operational outcomes. The increasing use of technology in agricultural machines may expose the human operator to excessive and undesirable information if the operator's information needs and information processing capabilities are ignored. In this study, a user-centered approach was used to design specific interface elements for an agricultural air seeder. Designs of the interface elements were evaluated in a laboratory environment by developing high-fidelity prototypes. Evaluations of the user interface elements yielded significant improvement in situation awareness (up to 11%; overall mean difference = 5.0 (4.8%), 95% CI (6.4728, 3.5939), p 0.0001). Mental workload was reduced by up to 19.7% (overall mean difference = -5.2 (-7.9%), n = 30, a = 0.05). Study participants rated the overall performance of the newly designed user-centered interface elements higher in comparison to the previous designs (overall mean difference = 27.3 (189.8%), 99% CI (35.150, 19.384), p 0.0001.

如果不采用以用户为中心的方法来设计信息显示,则呈现给用户的信息的数量和质量可能与用户的需求不匹配,或者可能超出人类操作员处理和使用该信息的能力。其结果可能是过度的精神负荷和操作员的情况意识降低,这可能会对机器性能和操作结果产生负面影响。如果忽略了操作人员的信息需求和信息处理能力,技术在农业机械中的应用越来越多,可能会使操作人员暴露在过多的和不受欢迎的信息中。在这项研究中,以用户为中心的方法被用来设计特定的界面元素的农业空气播种机。通过开发高保真原型,在实验室环境中对界面元素的设计进行了评估。对用户界面元素的评估在态势感知方面产生了显著改善(高达11%;总平均差= 5.0 (4.8%),95% CI (6.4728, 3.5939), p 0.0001)。精神负荷最多减少19.7%(总平均差= -5.2 (-7.9%),n = 30, a = 0.05)。与之前的设计相比,研究参与者对新设计的以用户为中心的界面元素的整体性能评价更高(总体平均差异= 27.3 (189.8%),99% CI (35.150, 19.384), p 0.0001)。
{"title":"DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF INDIVIDUAL ELEMENTS OF THE INTERFACE FOR AN AGRICULTURAL MACHINE.","authors":"Aadesh K Rakhra,&nbsp;Danny D Mann","doi":"10.13031/jash.12410","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.12410","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>If a user-centered approach is not used to design information displays, the quantity and quality of information presented to the user may not match the needs of the user, or it may exceed the capability of the human operator for processing and using that information. The result may be an excessive mental workload and reduced situation awareness of the operator, which can negatively affect the machine performance and operational outcomes. The increasing use of technology in agricultural machines may expose the human operator to excessive and undesirable information if the operator's information needs and information processing capabilities are ignored. In this study, a user-centered approach was used to design specific interface elements for an agricultural air seeder. Designs of the interface elements were evaluated in a laboratory environment by developing high-fidelity prototypes. Evaluations of the user interface elements yielded significant improvement in situation awareness (up to 11%; overall mean difference = 5.0 (4.8%), 95% CI (6.4728, 3.5939), p 0.0001). Mental workload was reduced by up to 19.7% (overall mean difference = -5.2 (-7.9%), n = 30, a = 0.05). Study participants rated the overall performance of the newly designed user-centered interface elements higher in comparison to the previous designs (overall mean difference = 27.3 (189.8%), 99% CI (35.150, 19.384), p 0.0001.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.13031/jash.12410","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35903858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
The prevalence of disabilities in the U.S. farm population 美国农业人口中残疾的普遍程度
IF 1 Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.13031/JASH.12934
Cristina Miller, R. Aherin
Abstract. Health limitations and disabilities among farmers, farmworkers, and farm family members may have implications on their day-to-day activities and well-being as well as the farm business, but little is known about the extent of these limitations and disabilities. Using the U.S. Census Bureau‘s American Community Survey (ACS) Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) files from 2008 to 2016, the following questions were examined: what is the prevalence of disability in the overall farm population; what is the prevalence of health difficulties and disability among farmers, farmworkers, and farm family members; and do farmer and farmworker disability prevalence rates vary over time, by state, gender, or race/ethnicity. Finally, the effects of demographic factors were estimated on the likelihood that farmers and farmworkers might experience a disability. The findings of this study indicated that the disability rate in the farm population was 12.9%. On average, almost two out of ten farmers (19.2%) and nearly one out of ten farmworkers (9.0%) had a disability. One in 25 farm family children (4.2%, ages 6 to 17) and slightly more than two in 25 farm family adults (10.5%) had a disability.
摘要农民、农场工人和农场家庭成员的健康限制和残疾可能对他们的日常活动和福祉以及农场业务产生影响,但对这些限制和残疾的程度知之甚少。利用美国人口普查局2008年至2016年的美国社区调查(ACS)公共使用微数据样本(PUMS)文件,研究了以下问题:在整个农场人口中,残疾的患病率是多少?农民、农场工人和农场家庭成员中健康困难和残疾的普遍程度如何;农民和农场工人的残疾患病率是否随时间、州、性别或种族/民族而变化?最后,估计了人口因素对农民和农场工人可能经历残疾的可能性的影响。本研究结果显示,农场人口残疾率为12.9%。平均而言,几乎十分之二的农民(19.2%)和近十分之一的农场工人(9.0%)患有残疾。每25个农场家庭儿童中就有1个(4.2%,6至17岁),每25个农场家庭成年人中略多于2个(10.5%)患有残疾。
{"title":"The prevalence of disabilities in the U.S. farm population","authors":"Cristina Miller, R. Aherin","doi":"10.13031/JASH.12934","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13031/JASH.12934","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Health limitations and disabilities among farmers, farmworkers, and farm family members may have implications on their day-to-day activities and well-being as well as the farm business, but little is known about the extent of these limitations and disabilities. Using the U.S. Census Bureau‘s American Community Survey (ACS) Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) files from 2008 to 2016, the following questions were examined: what is the prevalence of disability in the overall farm population; what is the prevalence of health difficulties and disability among farmers, farmworkers, and farm family members; and do farmer and farmworker disability prevalence rates vary over time, by state, gender, or race/ethnicity. Finally, the effects of demographic factors were estimated on the likelihood that farmers and farmworkers might experience a disability. The findings of this study indicated that the disability rate in the farm population was 12.9%. On average, almost two out of ten farmers (19.2%) and nearly one out of ten farmworkers (9.0%) had a disability. One in 25 farm family children (4.2%, ages 6 to 17) and slightly more than two in 25 farm family adults (10.5%) had a disability.","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.13031/JASH.12934","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67065031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
The Effect of Friction on Actuation Torques of Foldable Rollover Protective Structures. 摩擦对可折叠侧翻防护结构驱动力矩的影响。
IF 1 Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.13031/jash.12844
Farzaneh Khorsandi, Paul D Ayers

The number of fatal tractor rollover accidents with an inoperative foldable rollover protective structure (FROPS) has increased sharply in recent years. Operators frequently leave the FROPS in the folded-down position after lowering the FROPS to pass a low overhead obstacle. One possible explanation for leaving the FROPS in the folded position is that raising and lowering the FROPS is a time-consuming and strenuous process. The actuation torques required to raise and lower a FROPS are not well known and may be influenced by friction. The actuation torques of ten FROPS from four different models were measured. One model FROPS was tested on seven different vehicles, and three models were tested separately. The dynamic and static (initiation and holding) actuation torques were measured to evaluate the effect of static and kinetic friction on actuation torque. The dynamic actuation torques were measured before and after greasing the FROPS. The proposed instruction to measure the actuation torque based on OECD Code 7 was evaluated. Results showed that friction has a significant effect on the measured actuation torque and can increase the actuation torque by up to 212%. The friction varies between FROPS of the same model, which is due to variations in the manufacturing, maintenance, and age of the FROPS. The friction force could be decreased by greasing the FROPS, and decreasing the friction increased the lowering resisting torques and decreased raising torques of FROPS. The measured actuation torque based on OECD Code 7 instruction (static holding) is not a constant value. The dynamic method is recommended for measuring FROPS actuation torques.

近年来,可折叠侧翻防护结构失效导致的拖拉机侧翻事故数量急剧增加。作业人员在降低FROPS以通过低头顶障碍物后,通常会将FROPS置于折叠位置。将FROPS保持在折叠位置的一个可能的解释是,提高和降低FROPS是一个耗时和费力的过程。提高和降低FROPS所需的驱动力矩尚不清楚,可能会受到摩擦的影响。测量了4种不同型号的10个FROPS的驱动力矩。一种型号的FROPS在7种不同的车辆上进行了测试,三种型号的FROPS分别进行了测试。测量了动、静态(起爆和保持)驱动力矩,评价了静摩擦和动摩擦对驱动力矩的影响。测量了润滑前后的动态驱动力矩。对基于OECD规范7的驱动力矩测量指令进行了评价。结果表明,摩擦对驱动力矩有显著影响,可使驱动力矩增加212%。同一型号的FROPS之间的摩擦是不同的,这是由于FROPS的制造、维护和使用年限的不同。通过润滑可减小摩擦阻力,减小摩擦阻力可增大摩擦阻力的下降力矩,减小摩擦阻力的上升力矩。根据OECD代码7指令(静态保持)测量的致动扭矩不是一个恒定值。建议采用动态方法测量FROPS驱动力矩。
{"title":"The Effect of Friction on Actuation Torques of Foldable Rollover Protective Structures.","authors":"Farzaneh Khorsandi,&nbsp;Paul D Ayers","doi":"10.13031/jash.12844","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.12844","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The number of fatal tractor rollover accidents with an inoperative foldable rollover protective structure (FROPS) has increased sharply in recent years. Operators frequently leave the FROPS in the folded-down position after lowering the FROPS to pass a low overhead obstacle. One possible explanation for leaving the FROPS in the folded position is that raising and lowering the FROPS is a time-consuming and strenuous process. The actuation torques required to raise and lower a FROPS are not well known and may be influenced by friction. The actuation torques of ten FROPS from four different models were measured. One model FROPS was tested on seven different vehicles, and three models were tested separately. The dynamic and static (initiation and holding) actuation torques were measured to evaluate the effect of static and kinetic friction on actuation torque. The dynamic actuation torques were measured before and after greasing the FROPS. The proposed instruction to measure the actuation torque based on OECD Code 7 was evaluated. Results showed that friction has a significant effect on the measured actuation torque and can increase the actuation torque by up to 212%. The friction varies between FROPS of the same model, which is due to variations in the manufacturing, maintenance, and age of the FROPS. The friction force could be decreased by greasing the FROPS, and decreasing the friction increased the lowering resisting torques and decreased raising torques of FROPS. The measured actuation torque based on OECD Code 7 instruction (static holding) is not a constant value. The dynamic method is recommended for measuring FROPS actuation torques.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.13031/jash.12844","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38199316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Let's stop treating our youth like dummies 别再把年轻人当傻瓜了
IF 1 Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.13031/JASH.12822
W. Field, Yuan-Hsin Cheng, R. Tormoehlen, R. Aherin, C. Schwab, Daniel Neenan, M. Roberts
At a recent training event to evaluate various types of rescue devices and strategies to extricate victims from partial entrapment in free-flowing grain, a group of volunteer high school students were invited to participate as test subjects. For each test, two youth were equipped with full-body harnesses and lifelines, asked to stand on the grain surface in a semi-trailer load of dry corn, and then allowed to be drawn into the grain as the bottom discharge gate under each youth was opened. Both “victims” were drawn into the grain at either end of the trailer at the same time, each located over the deepest section of the trailer directly above a hopper. Photos were taken of the entrapped youth showing no more than their heads and shoulders above the grain surface.
在最近的一次培训活动中,评估了各种救援设备和从自由流动的谷物中救出部分被困的受害者的策略,一组志愿高中生被邀请作为测试对象参加。在每次试验中,两名青年被配备了全身安全带和救生索,被要求站在一辆满载干玉米的半挂车的谷物表面上,然后被拉入谷物中,每个青年下面的底部排料门被打开。两个“受害者”同时被拖进拖车两端的谷物中,每个人都位于拖车最深处的料斗上方。被困青年的照片只露出他们的头和肩膀。
{"title":"Let's stop treating our youth like dummies","authors":"W. Field, Yuan-Hsin Cheng, R. Tormoehlen, R. Aherin, C. Schwab, Daniel Neenan, M. Roberts","doi":"10.13031/JASH.12822","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13031/JASH.12822","url":null,"abstract":"At a recent training event to evaluate various types of rescue devices and strategies to extricate victims from partial entrapment in free-flowing grain, a group of volunteer high school students were invited to participate as test subjects. For each test, two youth were equipped with full-body harnesses and lifelines, asked to stand on the grain surface in a semi-trailer load of dry corn, and then allowed to be drawn into the grain as the bottom discharge gate under each youth was opened. Both “victims” were drawn into the grain at either end of the trailer at the same time, each located over the deepest section of the trailer directly above a hopper. Photos were taken of the entrapped youth showing no more than their heads and shoulders above the grain surface.","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.13031/JASH.12822","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67064924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
National Estimates of Youth and Injuries on U.S. Farms, 2012. 美国农场青少年和伤害的全国估计,2012。
IF 1 Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.13031/jash.13014
Kitty J Hendricks, Larry A Layne, E Michael Goldcamp

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), in order to provide injury surveillance for youth on farms in the U.S., partnered with the USDA to conduct the Childhood Agricultural Injury Survey (CAIS). CAIS data for all farm youth less than 20 years of age have been collected intermittently since 1998. CAIS data from 2012 indicated that an estimated 25.9 million youth lived on, worked on, or visited U.S. farms. These youth experienced almost 14,000 injuries while on the farm. The majority of these injuries occurred to males (7,290) and youth between the ages of 10 and 15 years (5,766). Approximately 20% (2,739) of the injuries were related to work being done on the farm. Youth living on the farm incurred 56% (7,784) of the injuries. An additional 5,771 injuries occurred to hired and visiting youth. Although youth injuries on farms have declined, the numbers are still unacceptably high. Additional research and detailed assessments of subsets of the youth population would help to better direct safety intervention programs and focus future research activities.

美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)与美国农业部合作开展了儿童农业伤害调查(CAIS),以便为美国农场的青少年提供伤害监测。自1998年以来,一直断断续续地收集所有20岁以下农业青年的CAIS数据。2012年的CAIS数据显示,估计有2590万年轻人在美国农场生活、工作或参观过农场。这些年轻人在农场受了近14000次伤。这些伤害大多数发生在男性(7290人)和10至15岁的青少年(5766人)。大约20%(2,739)的受伤与在农场工作有关。生活在农场的年轻人造成了56%(7784)的伤害。另有5771名受雇青年和来访青年受伤。尽管青少年在农场受伤的情况有所下降,但数字仍然高得令人无法接受。对青少年群体进行进一步的研究和详细的评估,将有助于更好地指导安全干预计划,并将重点放在未来的研究活动上。
{"title":"National Estimates of Youth and Injuries on U.S. Farms, 2012.","authors":"Kitty J Hendricks,&nbsp;Larry A Layne,&nbsp;E Michael Goldcamp","doi":"10.13031/jash.13014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.13014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), in order to provide injury surveillance for youth on farms in the U.S., partnered with the USDA to conduct the Childhood Agricultural Injury Survey (CAIS). CAIS data for all farm youth less than 20 years of age have been collected intermittently since 1998. CAIS data from 2012 indicated that an estimated 25.9 million youth lived on, worked on, or visited U.S. farms. These youth experienced almost 14,000 injuries while on the farm. The majority of these injuries occurred to males (7,290) and youth between the ages of 10 and 15 years (5,766). Approximately 20% (2,739) of the injuries were related to work being done on the farm. Youth living on the farm incurred 56% (7,784) of the injuries. An additional 5,771 injuries occurred to hired and visiting youth. Although youth injuries on farms have declined, the numbers are still unacceptably high. Additional research and detailed assessments of subsets of the youth population would help to better direct safety intervention programs and focus future research activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.13031/jash.13014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33491188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
期刊
Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1