Is Forest Bioenergy Carbon Neutral or Worse than Coal? Implications of Carbon Accounting Methods
森林生物能源是碳中和的还是比煤炭更糟？碳核算方法的启示
{"title":"Is Forest Bioenergy Carbon Neutral or Worse than Coal? Implications of Carbon Accounting Methods","authors":"M. Khanna, P. Dwivedi, R. Abt","doi":"10.1561/101.00000089","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000089","url":null,"abstract":"Is Forest Bioenergy Carbon Neutral or Worse than Coal? Implications of Carbon Accounting Methods","PeriodicalId":45355,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"10 1","pages":"299-346"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2017-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1561/101.00000089","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44083356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
As the support of human and natural activities, land is a resource of major interest both for environmental and socio-economic issues. Research aimed at improving land 10 management and conservation has long recognized the need to integrate both issues, but a consensual and consistent framework is still lacking. We argue that land price could be one of the possible links here, as a consistent proxy for some of the multiple dimensions of values that people put 15 on land resources. We present the elementary economic theory about land price, namely the present value model, and we review the abundant empirical literature using this classical theory to study the informational content of land price. We then propose a typology of this literature, high20 lighting its strengths and weaknesses, in order to guide future environmental research which aim at drawing out some socio-economically oriented policy recommendations.
{"title":"The Informational Content of Land Price and its Relevance for Environmental Issues","authors":"J. Ay, L. Latruffe","doi":"10.1561/101.00000086","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000086","url":null,"abstract":"As the support of human and natural activities, land is a resource of major interest both for environmental and socio-economic issues. Research aimed at improving land 10 management and conservation has long recognized the need to integrate both issues, but a consensual and consistent framework is still lacking. We argue that land price could be one of the possible links here, as a consistent proxy for some of the multiple dimensions of values that people put 15 on land resources. We present the elementary economic theory about land price, namely the present value model, and we review the abundant empirical literature using this classical theory to study the informational content of land price. We then propose a typology of this literature, high20 lighting its strengths and weaknesses, in order to guide future environmental research which aim at drawing out some socio-economically oriented policy recommendations.","PeriodicalId":45355,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"10 1","pages":"183-226"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2017-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1561/101.00000086","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43906218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-06-24DOI: 10.1007/s10640-017-0167-y
Lorenzo Cerda Planas
{"title":"Moving Toward Greener Societies: Moral Motivation and Green Behaviour","authors":"Lorenzo Cerda Planas","doi":"10.1007/s10640-017-0167-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0167-y","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45355,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"37 1","pages":"835 - 860"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2017-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74858940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper provides a review of the macro-level evidence on the importance of electricity for economic development. We find that electricity access and use are strongly correlated with economic development, as theory suggests. Despite a large empirical literature, however, there are few methodologically strong studies that establish causal effects of either electricity use or electricity infrastructure on economic growth. The micro-level literature provides more convincing evidence of causal effects, although these appear not to be uniform in all locations. We present a number of country case studies that are suggestive of electrification playing an important role in broad-based development progress. The paper also identifies potential avenues for future research. High-quality macro-level evidence on the economic effects of electricity access and reliability would help policy-makers and aid agencies make decisions regarding investment priorities.
{"title":"The Impact of Electricity on Economic Development: A Macroeconomic Perspective","authors":"Paul J. Burke, D. Stern, Stephan B. Bruns","doi":"10.1561/101.00000101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000101","url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a review of the macro-level evidence on the importance of electricity for economic development. We find that electricity access and use are strongly correlated with economic development, as theory suggests. Despite a large empirical literature, however, there are few methodologically strong studies that establish causal effects of either electricity use or electricity infrastructure on economic growth. The micro-level literature provides more convincing evidence of causal effects, although these appear not to be uniform in all locations. We present a number of country case studies that are suggestive of electrification playing an important role in broad-based development progress. The paper also identifies potential avenues for future research. High-quality macro-level evidence on the economic effects of electricity access and reliability would help policy-makers and aid agencies make decisions regarding investment priorities.","PeriodicalId":45355,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2017-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1561/101.00000101","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41564507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Economics in Systematic Conservation Planning for Lower-income Countries: A Literature Review and Assessment
低收入国家系统保护规划的经济学:文献回顾与评价
{"title":"Economics in Systematic Conservation Planning for Lower-income Countries: A Literature Review and Assessment","authors":"H. Albers, M. Maloney, E. Robinson","doi":"10.1561/101.00000085","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000085","url":null,"abstract":"Economics in Systematic Conservation Planning for Lower-income Countries: A Literature Review and Assessment","PeriodicalId":45355,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"10 1","pages":"145-182"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2017-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1561/101.00000085","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41966749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Daniel A. Brent, L. Friesen, Lata Gangadharan, A. Leibbrandt
Many environmental decisions are based on intrinsic motivations in addition to traditional economic incentives. Field experiments allow researchers to isolate a specific causal mechanism which can help advance our understanding of consumer and firm behavior in environmental markets. This article summarizes the literature on the use of field experiments in environmental economics, focusing on framed and artefactual field experiments as well as natural experiments targeting municipal energy and water demand. We set out a theoretical framework to improve the interpretation of results from field experiments in environmental economics. In addition to providing an overview of experimental methods and findings we also lay out a set of challenges for researchers interested in running a field experiment in environmental economics.
{"title":"Behavioral Insights from Field Experiments in Environmental Economics","authors":"Daniel A. Brent, L. Friesen, Lata Gangadharan, A. Leibbrandt","doi":"10.1561/101.00000084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000084","url":null,"abstract":"Many environmental decisions are based on intrinsic motivations in addition to traditional economic incentives. Field experiments allow researchers to isolate a specific causal mechanism which can help advance our understanding of consumer and firm behavior in environmental markets. This article summarizes the literature on the use of field experiments in environmental economics, focusing on framed and artefactual field experiments as well as natural experiments targeting municipal energy and water demand. We set out a theoretical framework to improve the interpretation of results from field experiments in environmental economics. In addition to providing an overview of experimental methods and findings we also lay out a set of challenges for researchers interested in running a field experiment in environmental economics.","PeriodicalId":45355,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"10 1","pages":"95-143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2017-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1561/101.00000084","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44886493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
While early literature on electricity externalities was largely concerned with fossil fuel power generation and the associated emissions, nuclear accidents (Chernobyl, Fukushima) and the large-scale deployment of renewable energy facilities have spurred a wave of research on the externalities of nuclear power and renewable energies. The issue is important because many countries have started reconsidering their energy policies, and the externalities from electricity generation play a major role in the benefit-cost analysis of relevant options. This paper reviews the literature on electricity-related externalities. It starts by discussing their nature and the methods employed in valuing them. It finds that appraisals of electricity externalities are complicated because of heterogeneity of both the externalities themselves and the methods applied in measuring them. The paper reviews valuation studies of the externalities from fossil fuel, nuclear and renewable sources, and it discusses the relevance of their findings for the siting of plants and the electricity mix. It concludes by pointing out gaps in our knowledge about electricity externalities that deserve to be addressed in future research.
{"title":"Electricity Externalities, Siting, and the Energy Mix: A Survey","authors":"H. Welsch","doi":"10.1561/101.00000083","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000083","url":null,"abstract":"While early literature on electricity externalities was largely concerned with fossil fuel power generation and the associated emissions, nuclear accidents (Chernobyl, Fukushima) and the large-scale deployment of renewable energy facilities have spurred a wave of research on the externalities of nuclear power and renewable energies. The issue is important because many countries have started reconsidering their energy policies, and the externalities from electricity generation play a major role in the benefit-cost analysis of relevant options. This paper reviews the literature on electricity-related externalities. It starts by discussing their nature and the methods employed in valuing them. It finds that appraisals of electricity externalities are complicated because of heterogeneity of both the externalities themselves and the methods applied in measuring them. The paper reviews valuation studies of the externalities from fossil fuel, nuclear and renewable sources, and it discusses the relevance of their findings for the siting of plants and the electricity mix. It concludes by pointing out gaps in our knowledge about electricity externalities that deserve to be addressed in future research.","PeriodicalId":45355,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"10 1","pages":"57-94"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2016-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1561/101.00000083","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67074792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Urbanization is arguably one of the most pervasive socioeconomic forces affecting economic development, ecosystem health, and humana well-being. This paper analyzes the interaction between urbanization, economic development, and environmental quality and provides an overview of the literature on the interaction. We argue that the complex roles of urbanization in the economic and ecological systems necessitate a new policy approach to urbanization management. This paper also provides a brief overview of land use policies at local, regional and national levels in the European Union and the United States and discusses policy options for urbanization management. It concludes with a brief discussion of policy challenges and research needs for efficient urbanization management.
{"title":"How Does Urbanization Affect the Economy and the Environment? Policy Challenges and Research Needs","authors":"JunJie Wu, W. Oueslati","doi":"10.1561/101.00000081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000081","url":null,"abstract":"Urbanization is arguably one of the most pervasive socioeconomic forces affecting economic development, ecosystem health, and humana well-being. This paper analyzes the interaction between urbanization, economic development, and environmental quality and provides an overview of the literature on the interaction. We argue that the complex roles of urbanization in the economic and ecological systems necessitate a new policy approach to urbanization management. This paper also provides a brief overview of land use policies at local, regional and national levels in the European Union and the United States and discusses policy options for urbanization management. It concludes with a brief discussion of policy challenges and research needs for efficient urbanization management.","PeriodicalId":45355,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2016-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1561/101.00000081","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67073890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
International Environmental Agreements: Doomed to Fail or Destined to Succeed? A Review of the Literature
国际环境协定:注定失败还是注定成功?文献综述
{"title":"International Environmental Agreements: Doomed to Fail or Destined to Succeed? A Review of the Literature","authors":"Walid Marrouch, A. Chaudhuri","doi":"10.1561/101.00000078","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000078","url":null,"abstract":"International Environmental Agreements: Doomed to Fail or Destined to Succeed? A Review of the Literature","PeriodicalId":45355,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"9 1","pages":"245-319"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2016-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1561/101.00000078","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67073780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In the existing literature much attention has been given to the toolbox of regulatory policy instruments for addressing environmental concerns. Microeconomic treatment of environmental policy considers the optimal allocation of a given scale of resource flow within the economy, but neglects the scale and composition of economic activity relative to the ecosystem that supports it. An ecological approach to macroeconomics requires the appreciation of physical constraints to economic growth. This paper presents the theoretical underpinnings and the empirical findings of the literature on the link between economic growth and environmental quality, as well as of the relationship between fiscal spending and environmental degradation, by reviewing the relevant literature. The empirical findings on both relationships are not robust and therefore remain inconclusive. This paper provides conclusions and directions for future research which may assist to solve this ambiguity on the examined relationships.
{"title":"Environmental Macroeconomics: Economic Growth, Fiscal Spending and Environmental Quality","authors":"G. Halkos, Epameinondas A. Paizanos","doi":"10.1561/101.00000079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000079","url":null,"abstract":"In the existing literature much attention has been given to the toolbox of regulatory policy instruments for addressing environmental concerns. Microeconomic treatment of environmental policy considers the optimal allocation of a given scale of resource flow within the economy, but neglects the scale and composition of economic activity relative to the ecosystem that supports it. An ecological approach to macroeconomics requires the appreciation of physical constraints to economic growth. This paper presents the theoretical underpinnings and the empirical findings of the literature on the link between economic growth and environmental quality, as well as of the relationship between fiscal spending and environmental degradation, by reviewing the relevant literature. The empirical findings on both relationships are not robust and therefore remain inconclusive. This paper provides conclusions and directions for future research which may assist to solve this ambiguity on the examined relationships.","PeriodicalId":45355,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"9 1","pages":"321-362"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2016-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1561/101.00000079","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67073824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：