The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need to examine factors related to questionable health behavior, such as avoiding recommended preventive guidelines. This paper aimed to explore whether behavior reflecting active avoidance of preventive measures against COVID-19 (curfew regulations, hygiene, facial masks, and social distancing) was best predicted by personality traits (Big Five), health beliefs, or feelings of threat. Thousand and twenty-four adults (486 men, 536 women) aged between 18 - 81 years participated in the study, which was run in early November 2020, when the second wave in Slovakia started to gain momentum and a strict lockdown was issued. Results showed that health threat was connected with having fewer questionable health beliefs, while economic threat was connected with having more questionable health beliefs, and together these factors were the strongest predictors of avoiding preventive regulations. From personality traits, higher Extraversion and lower Agreeableness predicted questionable health behavior, but together they added only 2.4% of explained variance. Our results highlight the fact that one year after the outbreak, the COVID-19 pandemic is no longer only (if it ever was) a health threat. The shift from health focus to the economic and socio-political threat should not be taken lightly, as it has implications for adherence to preventive measures against COVID-19 and people's beliefs regarding the pandemic.
{"title":"Being Nice or Being Scared? Personality Traits, Beliefs and Threat of COVID-19 as Predictors of Non-Normative Health Behaviors during Second Wave of Pandemic","authors":"V. Čavojová, Eva Ballová Mikušková, Jakub Šrol","doi":"10.31577/sp.2022.01.838","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31577/sp.2022.01.838","url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need to examine factors related to questionable health behavior, such as avoiding recommended preventive guidelines. This paper aimed to explore whether behavior reflecting active avoidance of preventive measures against COVID-19 (curfew regulations, hygiene, facial masks, and social distancing) was best predicted by personality traits (Big Five), health beliefs, or feelings of threat. Thousand and twenty-four adults (486 men, 536 women) aged between 18 - 81 years participated in the study, which was run in early November 2020, when the second wave in Slovakia started to gain momentum and a strict lockdown was issued. Results showed that health threat was connected with having fewer questionable health beliefs, while economic threat was connected with having more questionable health beliefs, and together these factors were the strongest predictors of avoiding preventive regulations. From personality traits, higher Extraversion and lower Agreeableness predicted questionable health behavior, but together they added only 2.4% of explained variance. Our results highlight the fact that one year after the outbreak, the COVID-19 pandemic is no longer only (if it ever was) a health threat. The shift from health focus to the economic and socio-political threat should not be taken lightly, as it has implications for adherence to preventive measures against COVID-19 and people's beliefs regarding the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":45798,"journal":{"name":"Studia Psychologica","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78635951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cyberchondria is a pattern of repetitive search for health information online, which has adverse psychological consequences in spite of its intention to relieve anxiety. This phenomenon is particularly relevant in the current pandemic accompanied by increased levels of uncertainty and fear, which can lead to increased volume of health information search on the internet, as well as cyberchondria. The first objective of this study was to test the factor structure, reliability, and convergent validity of Serbian adaptations of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS-12) and the Short Cyberchondria Scale (SCS). The second aim was to test the direct effects of cyberchondria on pseudoscientific practices (PSP) and the use of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) as well as its indirect effects through conspiracy mentality (CMQ). The sample included 511 participants (73.6% women) from Serbia, from the general population. The results support the adequate alpha reliabilities and four-factor structure of CSS-12 and the single-factor structure of SCS, as well as their positive correlations with health anxiety (HAQ), internet addiction (IAT), and obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCI-R Obsessions) and a negative correlation with self-esteem (a single-item scale). Additionally, the composite cyberchondria score had both direct and indirect effects on both questionable health practices. Our results revealed conspiracy mentality as one of the possible mechanisms through which cyberchondria is related to the use of PSP/CAM. It stems from distress related to cyberchondria and leads to an increased likelihood of adopting PSPs or CAM as a tool for maintaining a sense of control in an uncertain situation.
{"title":"Cyberchondria and Questionable Health Practices: The Mediation Role of Conspiracy Mentality","authors":"Aleksandar Vujić, Bojana M. Dinić, N. Jokić-begić","doi":"10.31577/sp.2022.01.842","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31577/sp.2022.01.842","url":null,"abstract":"Cyberchondria is a pattern of repetitive search for health information online, which has adverse psychological consequences in spite of its intention to relieve anxiety. This phenomenon is particularly relevant in the current pandemic accompanied by increased levels of uncertainty and fear, which can lead to increased volume of health information search on the internet, as well as cyberchondria. The first objective of this study was to test the factor structure, reliability, and convergent validity of Serbian adaptations of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS-12) and the Short Cyberchondria Scale (SCS). The second aim was to test the direct effects of cyberchondria on pseudoscientific practices (PSP) and the use of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) as well as its indirect effects through conspiracy mentality (CMQ). The sample included 511 participants (73.6% women) from Serbia, from the general population. The results support the adequate alpha reliabilities and four-factor structure of CSS-12 and the single-factor structure of SCS, as well as their positive correlations with health anxiety (HAQ), internet addiction (IAT), and obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCI-R Obsessions) and a negative correlation with self-esteem (a single-item scale). Additionally, the composite cyberchondria score had both direct and indirect effects on both questionable health practices. Our results revealed conspiracy mentality as one of the possible mechanisms through which cyberchondria is related to the use of PSP/CAM. It stems from distress related to cyberchondria and leads to an increased likelihood of adopting PSPs or CAM as a tool for maintaining a sense of control in an uncertain situation.","PeriodicalId":45798,"journal":{"name":"Studia Psychologica","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90906062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Although the complex reasons underlying parents' decision whether to vaccinate their children have been largely unraveled, a socio-cognitive perspective on the representational field of vaccination is missing. This study is a contribution to fill such a gap. A sample of 309 Portuguese mothers with children aged 0-6 years answered a self-administered questionnaire. Results show that psychosocial variables such as the number of children modulate mothers' representations of vaccination as a matter of freedom of choice and preference for natural immunity, while age of children and having (or not) searched for information influence their confidence in vaccines. Also, results show that representations related to freedom of choice, preference for natural immunity, and conspiracy theories are positively predicted by individualism values and a dependent decision-making style, whereas confidence in vaccines is positively associated with universalism values and a rational decision-making style. We discuss the implications of the socio-cognitive dynamics organizing mothers' representations about vaccines and vaccination for the understanding of behaviors about vaccines and the development of tailored measures for vaccination promotion.
{"title":"What Influences Representations on Vaccines and Children’s Vaccination? A Psychosocial Study on Mothers’ Representations, Values, and Decision-Making Styles","authors":"I. Miguel, J. Valentim, F. Carugati, P. Selleri","doi":"10.31577/sp.2022.01.840","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31577/sp.2022.01.840","url":null,"abstract":"Although the complex reasons underlying parents' decision whether to vaccinate their children have been largely unraveled, a socio-cognitive perspective on the representational field of vaccination is missing. This study is a contribution to fill such a gap. A sample of 309 Portuguese mothers with children aged 0-6 years answered a self-administered questionnaire. Results show that psychosocial variables such as the number of children modulate mothers' representations of vaccination as a matter of freedom of choice and preference for natural immunity, while age of children and having (or not) searched for information influence their confidence in vaccines. Also, results show that representations related to freedom of choice, preference for natural immunity, and conspiracy theories are positively predicted by individualism values and a dependent decision-making style, whereas confidence in vaccines is positively associated with universalism values and a rational decision-making style. We discuss the implications of the socio-cognitive dynamics organizing mothers' representations about vaccines and vaccination for the understanding of behaviors about vaccines and the development of tailored measures for vaccination promotion.","PeriodicalId":45798,"journal":{"name":"Studia Psychologica","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78038015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nevena Mijatović, Jasmina šljivić, Nemanja Tošić, L. Conić, Marija Petrović, I. Žeželj
Resorting to complementary/alternative medical (CAM) therapies can lead to bad health outcomes or interfere with officially recommended therapies. CAM use is, nevertheless, widespread and growing. This could be partially due to the perception of the CAM industry as powerless and non-profit oriented, in contrast to the pharmaceutical industry ("Big Pharma"). In reality, both industries are highly profitable and powerful;to highlight this similarity, science communicators coined the term "Big Suppla". Drawing from a sample of 242 participants upon all exclusions, we experimentally tested whether varying these attributes in presenting the industries impacts consumers' evaluation of the two categories of products (herbs and supplements) and their willingness to try and recommend them. We also tested whether the effect is moderated by conspiratorial thinking, and whether it is due to a change in trust. All hypotheses were pre-registered. As expected, participants who read the Big Suppla vignette decreased the endorsement of both supplements and herbs, whilst, against our hypotheses, there were no significant changes in endorsement in the contrasting "Baby Suppla" group. Conspiratorial thinking was related to more endorsement of CAM, but it did not moderate the experimental effects. We also did not observe the expected mediation by trust. Our most robust results corroborate the idea that challenging the myth of benevolence of the CAM industry makes people more critical in evaluating its products or considering their usage. They support the intuitions of science communicators who coined the term Big Suppla, and can help in tailoring public health messages.
{"title":"Big Suppla: Challenging the Common View of the Supplements and Herbs Industry Affects the Willingness to Try and Recommend Their Products","authors":"Nevena Mijatović, Jasmina šljivić, Nemanja Tošić, L. Conić, Marija Petrović, I. Žeželj","doi":"10.31577/sp.2022.01.841","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31577/sp.2022.01.841","url":null,"abstract":"Resorting to complementary/alternative medical (CAM) therapies can lead to bad health outcomes or interfere with officially recommended therapies. CAM use is, nevertheless, widespread and growing. This could be partially due to the perception of the CAM industry as powerless and non-profit oriented, in contrast to the pharmaceutical industry (\"Big Pharma\"). In reality, both industries are highly profitable and powerful;to highlight this similarity, science communicators coined the term \"Big Suppla\". Drawing from a sample of 242 participants upon all exclusions, we experimentally tested whether varying these attributes in presenting the industries impacts consumers' evaluation of the two categories of products (herbs and supplements) and their willingness to try and recommend them. We also tested whether the effect is moderated by conspiratorial thinking, and whether it is due to a change in trust. All hypotheses were pre-registered. As expected, participants who read the Big Suppla vignette decreased the endorsement of both supplements and herbs, whilst, against our hypotheses, there were no significant changes in endorsement in the contrasting \"Baby Suppla\" group. Conspiratorial thinking was related to more endorsement of CAM, but it did not moderate the experimental effects. We also did not observe the expected mediation by trust. Our most robust results corroborate the idea that challenging the myth of benevolence of the CAM industry makes people more critical in evaluating its products or considering their usage. They support the intuitions of science communicators who coined the term Big Suppla, and can help in tailoring public health messages.","PeriodicalId":45798,"journal":{"name":"Studia Psychologica","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90154648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The present study corroborates the role of personality in predicting adherence to containment measures in the Visegrád Four countries (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia) with a total sample of N = 7463 participants. The Big-five traits predicted compliance both directly and indirectly, via concerns over coronavirus and trust in organizations. Openness, Conscientiousness, and Extraversion predicted compliance positively, while Neuroticism and Agreeableness negatively. Furthermore, the effect was mediated by corona concerns. Although Agreeableness, Neuroticism, Openness, and Conscientiousness predicted compliance negatively, the mediating role of trust was corroborated only for Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism and the effect size was smaller. The implications are that personality could be considered an important factor in compliant behavior even in an "extreme" situation such as a pandemic, and that this effect is also indirect via concerns over coronavirus and trust in institutions (although to a much lesser degree). The findings might help practitioners tailor effective messages in times of pandemic.
{"title":"Individual Differences in Compliance with Covid-19 Containment Measures in V4 Countries","authors":"Katarína Kušnírová, Pavol Kačmár","doi":"10.31577/sp.2022.01.836","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31577/sp.2022.01.836","url":null,"abstract":"The present study corroborates the role of personality in predicting adherence to containment measures in the Visegrád Four countries (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia) with a total sample of N = 7463 participants. The Big-five traits predicted compliance both directly and indirectly, via concerns over coronavirus and trust in organizations. Openness, Conscientiousness, and Extraversion predicted compliance positively, while Neuroticism and Agreeableness negatively. Furthermore, the effect was mediated by corona concerns. Although Agreeableness, Neuroticism, Openness, and Conscientiousness predicted compliance negatively, the mediating role of trust was corroborated only for Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism and the effect size was smaller. The implications are that personality could be considered an important factor in compliant behavior even in an \"extreme\" situation such as a pandemic, and that this effect is also indirect via concerns over coronavirus and trust in institutions (although to a much lesser degree). The findings might help practitioners tailor effective messages in times of pandemic.","PeriodicalId":45798,"journal":{"name":"Studia Psychologica","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73858754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The primary aim of our study was to examine the role of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs in predicting outcomes that could potentially worsen the course of the pandemic: preventive behavior, vaccination intentions and willingness to share COVID-19 related opinions. Structural equation modeling was performed on a Slovenian sample (N = 490). Analysis showed that COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs predicted all three health-related outcomes when sociodemographic variables were controlled for. Further, a perceived coronavirus threat was identified as an important mediating factor between conspiracy beliefs, preventive behavior and vaccination intentions. Conspiracy beliefs were also positively associated with age, female gender, religiosity, and share of COVID-19 information from social media, while they were negatively associated with level of education. The results suggest that COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs may be an important barrier to achieving pandemic management goals and highlight some risk factors for their occurrence.
{"title":"Examining the Role of COVID-19 Conspiracy Beliefs in Predicting Vaccination Intentions, Preventive Behavior and Willingness to Share Opinions about the Coronavirus","authors":"Žan Zelič, Martin Berič, Darja Kobal Grum","doi":"10.31577/sp.2022.01.844","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31577/sp.2022.01.844","url":null,"abstract":"The primary aim of our study was to examine the role of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs in predicting outcomes that could potentially worsen the course of the pandemic: preventive behavior, vaccination intentions and willingness to share COVID-19 related opinions. Structural equation modeling was performed on a Slovenian sample (N = 490). Analysis showed that COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs predicted all three health-related outcomes when sociodemographic variables were controlled for. Further, a perceived coronavirus threat was identified as an important mediating factor between conspiracy beliefs, preventive behavior and vaccination intentions. Conspiracy beliefs were also positively associated with age, female gender, religiosity, and share of COVID-19 information from social media, while they were negatively associated with level of education. The results suggest that COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs may be an important barrier to achieving pandemic management goals and highlight some risk factors for their occurrence.","PeriodicalId":45798,"journal":{"name":"Studia Psychologica","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86162010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Alternative Ways to Mental Health: Exploring Psychological Determinants of Preference for CAM Treatments","authors":"Anastasija Budžak, M. Branković","doi":"10.31577/sp.2022.01.843","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31577/sp.2022.01.843","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45798,"journal":{"name":"Studia Psychologica","volume":"167 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75187738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-31DOI: 10.21697/sp.2021.21.2.04
M. M. Kwiatkowska, Włodzimierz Strus
The purpose of this paper is to present a new model of social inhibition (a) conceptualised as a dual structured construct including shyness and modesty, and (b) showing the complexity and diversity of these two social inhibition forms across various domains of psychosocial functioning (i.e., self-image, cognitive, emotional, and behavioural). Locating these two forms of social inhibition within the space of the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits enabled us to identify conceptually adjacent constructs to social inhibition and put the latter into a broad personality context. Through supplementary meta-analyses of the relations of shyness and modesty with the Big Five personality traits, we confront our theoretical proposition with existing empirical findings. Our paper implies that social inhibition might be successfully treated as a psychosocial disposition with two related and shared core elements, but distinct and differentially targeted forms—more neurotic and dysfunctional shyness and more agreeable and adaptive modesty.
{"title":"Social Inhibition: Theoretical Review and Implications for a Dual Social Inhibition Model within the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits","authors":"M. M. Kwiatkowska, Włodzimierz Strus","doi":"10.21697/sp.2021.21.2.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/sp.2021.21.2.04","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to present a new model of social inhibition (a) conceptualised as a dual structured construct including shyness and modesty, and (b) showing the complexity and diversity of these two social inhibition forms across various domains of psychosocial functioning (i.e., self-image, cognitive, emotional, and behavioural). Locating these two forms of social inhibition within the space of the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits enabled us to identify conceptually adjacent constructs to social inhibition and put the latter into a broad personality context. Through supplementary meta-analyses of the relations of shyness and modesty with the Big Five personality traits, we confront our theoretical proposition with existing empirical findings. Our paper implies that social inhibition might be successfully treated as a psychosocial disposition with two related and shared core elements, but distinct and differentially targeted forms—more neurotic and dysfunctional shyness and more agreeable and adaptive modesty.","PeriodicalId":45798,"journal":{"name":"Studia Psychologica","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81817428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-30DOI: 10.21697/sp.2021.21.2.03
Piotr Brud
Zaburzenie osobowości z pogranicza (borderline) jest jednym z najbardziej rozpowszechnionych zaburzeń, a jednocześnie dość problematycznym w diagnozie, na co wskazywały kolejne edycje DSM i ICD. Od dawna wykazywano heterogeniczność osobowości borderline. Zasadniczo pokazywano ją przy pomocy dwóch uzupełniających się podejść: (1) skoncentrowanego na zmiennych, gdzie wyodrębniano czynniki oraz (2) skoncentrowanego na osobach, w którym identyfikowano typy jako konfiguracje zmiennych. W niniejszym artykule zaprezentowany jest przegląd literatury na temat zróżnicowania osobowości borderline w obu podejściach. Zidentyfikowanych zostało 37 modeli borderline, w tym 12, w których stosowano podejście skoncentrowane na zmiennych i 25 – podejście skoncentrowane na osobach. W modelach tych wyodrębnione zostały pojedyncze jednostki znaczeniowe, którymi autorzy posługiwali się do opisu osobowości borderline. Łącznie wyróżniono 59 takich jednostek, które następnie zostały połączone w 11 grup spójnych znaczeniowo.
{"title":"Przegląd kryteriów diagnostycznych, cech i typów osobowości borderline wraz z próbą ich porządkowania","authors":"Piotr Brud","doi":"10.21697/sp.2021.21.2.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/sp.2021.21.2.03","url":null,"abstract":"Zaburzenie osobowości z pogranicza (borderline) jest jednym z najbardziej rozpowszechnionych zaburzeń, a jednocześnie dość problematycznym w diagnozie, na co wskazywały kolejne edycje DSM i ICD. Od dawna wykazywano heterogeniczność osobowości borderline. Zasadniczo pokazywano ją przy pomocy dwóch uzupełniających się podejść: (1) skoncentrowanego na zmiennych, gdzie wyodrębniano czynniki oraz (2) skoncentrowanego na osobach, w którym identyfikowano typy jako konfiguracje zmiennych. W niniejszym artykule zaprezentowany jest przegląd literatury na temat zróżnicowania osobowości borderline w obu podejściach. Zidentyfikowanych zostało 37 modeli borderline, w tym 12, w których stosowano podejście skoncentrowane na zmiennych i 25 – podejście skoncentrowane na osobach. W modelach tych wyodrębnione zostały pojedyncze jednostki znaczeniowe, którymi autorzy posługiwali się do opisu osobowości borderline. Łącznie wyróżniono 59 takich jednostek, które następnie zostały połączone w 11 grup spójnych znaczeniowo.","PeriodicalId":45798,"journal":{"name":"Studia Psychologica","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85575363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-30DOI: 10.21697/sp.2021.21.2.02
Monika Bartosiewicz-Niziołek, Łukasz Błasiak, Bartosz Olszewski, M. Ostrowska, A. Wojciechowska
Powstanie zespołów mobilnych wiąże się z reformą psychiatrycznej opieki zdrowotnej i zmianie modelu leczenia z udzielania opieki w dużych szpitalach psychiatrycznych na rzecz działań realizowanych na poziomie społeczności lokalnej. Zespoły mobilne uzupełniają model podstawowy o usługi docierające do osób, które bez ich wsparcia mogłyby nie uzyskać pomocy, przez co są bardzo istotnym i innowacyjnym elementem środowiskowego modelu opieki psychiatrycznej, pełniącym wiodącą rolę w procesie zdrowienia osób z doświadczeniem kryzysu psychicznego. Głównym celem działalności zespołów mobilnych jest mobilizowanie osób z doświadczeniem kryzysu psychicznego do rozwiązywania swoich problemów w sytuacjach, w których jest to możliwe i osiągalne. W artykule przedstawiono kontekst historyczno-kulturowy wraz z rolą zespołów mobilnych w opiece psychiatrycznej. Przedstawiono korzyści płynące z udzielenia pomocy bezpośrednio w środowisku klienta oraz scharakteryzowano zadania zespołów mobilnych oraz ich współpracę z otoczeniem społecznym i asystentami zdrowienia.
{"title":"Zespoły mobilne a zapobieganie hospitalizacji w środowiskowym modelu opieki psychiatrycznej","authors":"Monika Bartosiewicz-Niziołek, Łukasz Błasiak, Bartosz Olszewski, M. Ostrowska, A. Wojciechowska","doi":"10.21697/sp.2021.21.2.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/sp.2021.21.2.02","url":null,"abstract":"Powstanie zespołów mobilnych wiąże się z reformą psychiatrycznej opieki zdrowotnej i zmianie modelu leczenia z udzielania opieki w dużych szpitalach psychiatrycznych na rzecz działań realizowanych na poziomie społeczności lokalnej. Zespoły mobilne uzupełniają model podstawowy o usługi docierające do osób, które bez ich wsparcia mogłyby nie uzyskać pomocy, przez co są bardzo istotnym i innowacyjnym elementem środowiskowego modelu opieki psychiatrycznej, pełniącym wiodącą rolę w procesie zdrowienia osób z doświadczeniem kryzysu psychicznego. Głównym celem działalności zespołów mobilnych jest mobilizowanie osób z doświadczeniem kryzysu psychicznego do rozwiązywania swoich problemów w sytuacjach, w których jest to możliwe i osiągalne. W artykule przedstawiono kontekst historyczno-kulturowy wraz z rolą zespołów mobilnych w opiece psychiatrycznej. Przedstawiono korzyści płynące z udzielenia pomocy bezpośrednio w środowisku klienta oraz scharakteryzowano zadania zespołów mobilnych oraz ich współpracę z otoczeniem społecznym i asystentami zdrowienia.","PeriodicalId":45798,"journal":{"name":"Studia Psychologica","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84892151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：