European Constitutional Law Review最新文献

英文中文

Resisting Surrender on Grounds of Health: Moving beyond the Systemic Deficiencies Requirement in the Area of the European Arrest Warrant? 以健康为由拒绝自首：在欧洲逮捕令领域超越系统缺陷要求？

IF 2.1 2区社会学 Q1 Social Sciences

European Constitutional Law Review

Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI: 10.1017/s1574019623000275

G. Anagnostaras, A. Tsadiras

引用次数: 0

Constitutional Identity, Legal Autonomy, and Sovereignty 宪法身份、法律自主和主权

IF 2.1 2区社会学 Q1 Social Sciences

European Constitutional Law Review

Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI: 10.1017/s1574019623000299

Oran Doyle

引用次数: 0

What the European Court of Justice is for – Making Sense of the ECJ’s Procedural and Organisational Law 欧洲法院的作用 - 理解欧洲法院的程序法和组织法

IF 2.1 2区社会学 Q1 Social Sciences

European Constitutional Law Review

Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI: 10.1017/s1574019623000305

Paul Dermine

引用次数: 0

EU Trade Policy between Constitutional Openness and Strategic Autonomy 介于宪法开放与战略自主之间的欧盟贸易政策

IF 2.1 2区社会学 Q1 Social Sciences

European Constitutional Law Review

Pub Date : 2024-01-08 DOI: 10.1017/s1574019623000226

Gesa Kübek, Isabella Mancini

From ‘strategic autonomy’ to ‘open strategic autonomy’ in the 2021 EU Trade Policy Review – questioning the added value of the qualifier ‘open’ – legal exploration of ‘openness’ in EU external trade – identification of constitutional norms of ‘openness’ in the Treaties – strong constitutional preference for openness – discretion for trade liberalisation and multilateralism and international cooperation but strict obligation for compliance with international law – reviewing recent EU trade instruments in light of these norms – rise in unilateral trade policy instruments adopted since 2021 in pursuit of open strategic autonomy – instruments seeking to restore reciprocity in international trade relations – instruments using access to the internal market as a lever for achieving global sustainability goals – instruments preserving EU security through trade – problematic tensions with international law – very limited ‘openness’ in ‘open strategic autonomy’.

2021 年欧盟贸易政策回顾中从 "战略自主 "到 "开放的战略自主" - 质疑 "开放 "这一修饰词的附加值 - 对欧盟对外贸易中 "开放 "的法律探讨 - 确定条约中 "开放 "的宪法规范 - 宪法对开放的强烈偏好 - 贸易自由化、多边主义和国际合作的自由裁量权，但遵守国际法的严格义务 - 根据这些规范回顾近期的欧盟贸易工具根据这些规范审查欧盟近期的贸易文书 - 自 2021 年以来为追求开放战略自主而通过的单边贸易政策文书的增加 - 寻求恢复国际贸易关系中的互惠性的文书 - 将进入内部市场作为实现全球可持续发展目标的杠杆的文书 - 通过贸易维护欧盟安全的文书 - 与国际法的紧张关系问题 - "开放战略自主 "中非常有限的 "开放性"。

引用次数: 0

The Lazy Legislature: Incorporating and Horizontalising the Charter of Fundamental Rights through Secondary Union Law 懒惰的立法机构：通过二级联盟法纳入《基本权利宪章》并使之横向化

IF 2.1 2区社会学 Q1 Social Sciences

European Constitutional Law Review

Pub Date : 2023-12-20 DOI: 10.1017/s1574019623000238

Tobias Mast, Christian Ollig

Constitutionalising private law – Horizontal effect of fundamental rights –New legislative techniques in the EU in platform governance – References to the Charter of Fundamental Rights in secondary union law – Article 14(4) of the Digital Services Act – Article 5(1) subparagraph 2 of the Terrorist Content Online Regulation – Compatibility of secondary union law references to the Charter with primary union law – Interpretative methodology of secondary union law references

私法宪法化 - 基本权利的横向效力 - 欧盟在平台治理方面的新立法技术 - 二级联盟法对《基本权利宪章》的引用 - 《数字服务法》第 14(4)条 - 《在线恐怖内容管理条例》第 5(1)条第 2 款 - 二级联盟法对《宪章》的引用与一级联盟法的兼容性 - 二级联盟法引用的解释方法论

引用次数: 0

Is Centralised General Data Protection Regulation Enforcement a Constitutional Necessity? 集中执行一般资料保护规例是否符合宪法要求?

IF 2.1 2区社会学 Q1 Social Sciences

European Constitutional Law Review

Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI: 10.1017/s1574019623000202

Filipe Brito Bastos, Przemysław Pałka

Protection of personal data as a fundamental right – GDPR’s enforcement dilemma in cross-border cases – “One-stop-shop” model’s inadequacies highlighted – Distinction: regular cross-border enforcement versus cases of common European concern – Proposal: centralised enforcement mechanism for cases of common European concern – Union supervisory authority as a solution – Insufficiencies of the harmonisation proposal of the European Commission – Centralisation’s advantages: uniform enforcement, better coordination, and curbing forum shopping – Implications: fundamental rights protection and EU’s constitutional obligations – Constructive critique of the one-stop-shop model, not a dismissal – European constitutional law mandates effective data protection enforcement.

个人数据保护作为一项基本权利- GDPR在跨境案件中的执行困境-“一站式”模式的不足之处-区分:常规跨境执法与欧洲共同关注的案件-建议:欧洲共同关注案件的集中执法机制-欧盟监管机构作为解决方案-欧盟委员会协调提案的不足-集中化的优势:统一执法，更好的协调，遏制论坛购物-启示:基本权利保护和欧盟宪法义务-对一站式服务模式的建设性批评，而不是驳回-欧洲宪法要求有效的数据保护执法。

引用次数: 0

Citizenship Deprivation in the Courts: Unveiling States’ Constitutional Structures 法院剥夺公民权:揭露各州的宪法结构

2区社会学 Q1 Social Sciences

European Constitutional Law Review

Pub Date : 2023-11-03 DOI: 10.1017/s1574019623000196

Rachel Pougnet

Citizenship deprivation on security grounds – Difference in state practices – Underlying citizenship regimes and states’ constitutional structures – Constitutional roles attributed to the citizen – Judicial decisions on citizenship deprivation – Comparison with a focus on France and the United Kingdom

基于安全理由剥夺公民身份-国家实践的差异-基本的公民制度和国家宪法结构-公民的宪法角色-关于剥夺公民身份的司法决定-与法国和英国的比较

引用次数: 0

Further Extension of Protection against Discrimination on Grounds of Sexual Orientation under Directive 2000/78/EC 根据指令2000/78/EC进一步扩大防止基于性取向的歧视的保护

2区社会学 Q1 Social Sciences

European Constitutional Law Review

Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI: 10.1017/s1574019623000184

Tomasz Jaroszyński, Justyna Łacny

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

此内容没有摘要。当您可以访问此内容时，该页上会提供完整的HTML内容。此内容的PDF也可以通过“保存PDF”操作按钮获得。

引用次数: 0

Empirical Constitutional Studies 实证宪制研究

2区社会学 Q1 Social Sciences

European Constitutional Law Review

Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI: 10.1017/s1574019623000172

Arthur Dyevre

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

此内容的摘要不可用，因此提供了预览。有关如何访问此内容的信息，请使用上面的获取访问链接。

引用次数: 0

The Inapplicability of the Bosphorus Presumption to the European Economic Area Agreement: A Risk for the Coherence of Legal Systems in Europe 博斯普鲁斯推定不适用于欧洲经济区协定:欧洲法律制度一致性的风险

2区社会学 Q1 Social Sciences

European Constitutional Law Review

Pub Date : 2023-09-11 DOI: 10.1017/s1574019623000159

Umberto Lattanzi

The European Court of Human Rights holds that the Bosphorus presumption of equivalent protection cannot apply to the European Economic Area (EEA) Agreement – Its reasons focus on EEA Agreement’s lack of primacy, direct effect and adequate enforcement mechanisms – Not applying Bosphorus presumption to EEA Agreement results in the indirect review of EU law by the Strasbourg Court, given that EEA and EU law are substantially identical – Court’s arguments are open to strong criticism – However, its conclusions are correct – They are substantiated by two considerations, which were overlooked by the Court – First, EEA law is to be considered ‘freely entered into’ international law under the Matthews case law – Second, the EFTA Court lacks the power to strike down EEA law breaching upon fundamental rights – Both these consideration are the corollary of the fundamental premises of the EEA Agreement: the retention by EFTA states of sovereign decision-making powers – Refusal to apply Bosphorus presumption to EEA Agreement will likely determine a growing inconsistency between the Convention, EU and EEA law – This entails serious systemic problems

欧洲人权法院认为，同等保护的博斯普鲁斯推定不能适用于欧洲经济区(EEA)协议-其理由集中在EEA协议缺乏首要性，直接效力和适当的执行机制-不将博斯普鲁斯推定适用于EEA协议导致斯特拉斯堡法院间接审查欧盟法律，因为EEA和欧盟法律实质上是相同的-法院的论点是开放的强烈批评-然而，它的结论是正确的——它们得到了两个考虑因素的证实，而这两个考虑因素被法院忽视了——首先，根据马修斯判例法，欧洲经济区法被认为是“自由进入”的国际法——第二，欧洲自由贸易区法院缺乏推翻违反基本权利的欧洲经济区法的权力——这两个考虑因素都是欧洲经济区协议基本前提的必然结果:欧洲自由贸易联盟国家保留主权决策权——拒绝将博斯普鲁斯推定适用于欧洲经济区协议，可能会导致公约、欧盟和欧洲经济区法律之间日益不一致——这将导致严重的系统性问题

{"title":"The Inapplicability of the <i>Bosphorus</i> Presumption to the European Economic Area Agreement: A Risk for the Coherence of Legal Systems in Europe","authors":"Umberto Lattanzi","doi":"10.1017/s1574019623000159","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1574019623000159","url":null,"abstract":"The European Court of Human Rights holds that the Bosphorus presumption of equivalent protection cannot apply to the European Economic Area (EEA) Agreement – Its reasons focus on EEA Agreement’s lack of primacy, direct effect and adequate enforcement mechanisms – Not applying Bosphorus presumption to EEA Agreement results in the indirect review of EU law by the Strasbourg Court, given that EEA and EU law are substantially identical – Court’s arguments are open to strong criticism – However, its conclusions are correct – They are substantiated by two considerations, which were overlooked by the Court – First, EEA law is to be considered ‘freely entered into’ international law under the Matthews case law – Second, the EFTA Court lacks the power to strike down EEA law breaching upon fundamental rights – Both these consideration are the corollary of the fundamental premises of the EEA Agreement: the retention by EFTA states of sovereign decision-making powers – Refusal to apply Bosphorus presumption to EEA Agreement will likely determine a growing inconsistency between the Convention, EU and EEA law – This entails serious systemic problems","PeriodicalId":45815,"journal":{"name":"European Constitutional Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135980572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

首页上一页

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

European Constitutional Law Review

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀