Pub Date : 2024-06-17eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3205/zma001689
Michaela Wagner-Menghin
{"title":"Beliefs for successful feedback communication.","authors":"Michaela Wagner-Menghin","doi":"10.3205/zma001689","DOIUrl":"10.3205/zma001689","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 3","pages":"Doc34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11310782/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141917715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-17eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3205/zma001684
Kevin Kunz, Hannah Köpper
Background: As part of the MERLIN project (Medical Education Research - Lehrforschung im Netz BW), funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, graduate surveys were carried out at the Medical Faculty of Freiburg from 2012-2020. This article will primarily address the question of how the study conditions and competence orientation in Freiburg are assessed and where there is still a need for optimization.
Method: The surveys were conducted among graduates of human medicine at the Freiburg Medical Faculty 1.5 years after graduation. Participation was possible using paper and online questionnaires. The response rates were 36%-43%.
Results: The study conditions were largely rated as good. There is a need for optimization, especially in the area of scientific work. The level of skills acquired was assessed as good to moderate. There were discrepancies between the level of competence achieved during the course of study and the level of competence required to start a career.
Discussion: There is a need for development in terms of preparation for starting a career. Compared to the professionally required level of competence, self-assessment was worse in most competence domains. In Freiburg there are approaches to further promote the acquisition of skills during studies. In order to evaluate these developments and future changes in the context of studies, graduate surveys are relevant.
Conclusion: Graduate surveys are suitable for generating data on the basis of which curriculum design can be carried out or which can be used to prepare for change processes. The surveys in Freiburg will therefore be continued and supplemented with new, needs-based questions.
背景:作为联邦教育与研究部资助的MERLIN项目(Medical Education Research - Lehrforschung im Netz BW)的一部分,弗莱堡医学院在2012-2020年间开展了毕业生调查。本文将主要探讨如何评估弗莱堡的学习条件和能力定位,以及在哪些方面仍需优化:调查对象为弗莱堡医学院人类医学专业毕业一年半后的毕业生。参与方式包括纸质问卷和在线问卷。答复率为 36%-43%:研究条件基本良好。结果:学习条件基本被评为良好,但仍需优化,尤其是在科研工作方面。获得的技能水平被评为良好至中等。在学习期间达到的能力水平与开始职业生涯所需的能力水平之间存在差异:讨论:在为开始职业生涯做准备方面需要发展。与职业要求的能力水平相比,自我评估在大多数能力领域都较差。弗莱堡采取了一些措施,进一步促进学生在学习期间掌握技能。为了评估这些发展和未来在学习方面的变化,毕业生调查具有重要意义:结论:毕业生调查适用于提供数据,在此基础上进行课程设计或为改革进程做准备。因此,将继续在弗莱堡开展调查,并根据需要提出新的问题。
{"title":"Medical studies at the University of Freiburg in retrospect - study conditions, study quality and skills acquisition from the perspective of graduates.","authors":"Kevin Kunz, Hannah Köpper","doi":"10.3205/zma001684","DOIUrl":"10.3205/zma001684","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As part of the MER<i>LIN</i> project (Medical Education Research - Lehrforschung im Netz BW), funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, graduate surveys were carried out at the Medical Faculty of Freiburg from 2012-2020. This article will primarily address the question of how the study conditions and competence orientation in Freiburg are assessed and where there is still a need for optimization.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The surveys were conducted among graduates of human medicine at the Freiburg Medical Faculty 1.5 years after graduation. Participation was possible using paper and online questionnaires. The response rates were 36%-43%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study conditions were largely rated as good. There is a need for optimization, especially in the area of scientific work. The level of skills acquired was assessed as good to moderate. There were discrepancies between the level of competence achieved during the course of study and the level of competence required to start a career.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There is a need for development in terms of preparation for starting a career. Compared to the professionally required level of competence, self-assessment was worse in most competence domains. In Freiburg there are approaches to further promote the acquisition of skills during studies. In order to evaluate these developments and future changes in the context of studies, graduate surveys are relevant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Graduate surveys are suitable for generating data on the basis of which curriculum design can be carried out or which can be used to prepare for change processes. The surveys in Freiburg will therefore be continued and supplemented with new, needs-based questions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 3","pages":"Doc29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11310789/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141917719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-17eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3205/zma001682
Marie-Christin Dronia, Kim Dillen, Frank Elsner, Manuela Schallenburger, Martin Neukirchen, Anna Hagemeier, Stefanie Hamacher, Axel Doll, Raymond Voltz, Heidrun Golla
Objective: In 2009, Palliative care was incorporated into the medical curriculum as Cross-Sectional Subject 13 (QB13) by means of the revision of the Medical Licensing Regulations for Physicians. The aim of this study was to determine the strengths and deficits of QB13 student education for palliative care in clinical practice in a multi-centre setting and to identify potential for improvement.
Methods: Online questionnaires filled out by medical students during their Practical Year (PY) and resident physicians from the university hospitals in Aachen, Düsseldorf, and Cologne were descriptively analyzed using SPSS; free-text responses were categorized and quantified. Semi-structured interviews with the resident physicians (using a mixed-methods design) were analyzed through content analysis. Emerging categories were quantified.
Results: Analysis of 130 fully completed questionnaires and 23 interviews revealed that participants particularly benefited from patient- and practice-oriented small-group sessions for their clinical work. Despite some university-specific differences, the PY students identified a need for training in end-of-life-care, while resident physicians saw a need for training primarily in dealing with patients and their relatives. They also reported deficits in transferability.
Conclusion: QB13 should be organised in cross-university curricula and provide sufficient resources for practical-oriented small-group teaching. Based on the "unit of care", besides caring for palliative patients, dealing with patients' families should also be an education focus. To improve transferability into clinical practice, students should be actively involved in the care of palliative patients.
{"title":"Palliative care education and knowledge transfer into practice - a multicenter survey among medical students and resident physicians in Germany using a mixed-methods design.","authors":"Marie-Christin Dronia, Kim Dillen, Frank Elsner, Manuela Schallenburger, Martin Neukirchen, Anna Hagemeier, Stefanie Hamacher, Axel Doll, Raymond Voltz, Heidrun Golla","doi":"10.3205/zma001682","DOIUrl":"10.3205/zma001682","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In 2009, Palliative care was incorporated into the medical curriculum as Cross-Sectional Subject 13 (QB13) by means of the revision of the Medical Licensing Regulations for Physicians. The aim of this study was to determine the strengths and deficits of QB13 student education for palliative care in clinical practice in a multi-centre setting and to identify potential for improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online questionnaires filled out by medical students during their Practical Year (PY) and resident physicians from the university hospitals in Aachen, Düsseldorf, and Cologne were descriptively analyzed using SPSS; free-text responses were categorized and quantified. Semi-structured interviews with the resident physicians (using a mixed-methods design) were analyzed through content analysis. Emerging categories were quantified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 130 fully completed questionnaires and 23 interviews revealed that participants particularly benefited from patient- and practice-oriented small-group sessions for their clinical work. Despite some university-specific differences, the PY students identified a need for training in end-of-life-care, while resident physicians saw a need for training primarily in dealing with patients and their relatives. They also reported deficits in transferability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>QB13 should be organised in cross-university curricula and provide sufficient resources for practical-oriented small-group teaching. Based on the \"unit of care\", besides caring for palliative patients, dealing with patients' families should also be an education focus. To improve transferability into clinical practice, students should be actively involved in the care of palliative patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 3","pages":"Doc27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11310786/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141917720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-15eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3205/zma001676
Sandra Brügge, Veronika Günther, Ingolf Cascorbi, Nicolai Maass, Zino Ruchay, Martin R Fischer, Johanna Huber, Ibrahim Alkatout
Aim: Training decisions are viewed as a problem by the majority of medical students.In the present study we compared sociodemographic and psychological characteristics of students who are interested in surgical training to those who preferred a non-surgical specialty. Furthermore, we examined whether students who wish to be trained as surgeons performed better than their non-surgical counterparts in a course designed to acquire skills in minimally invasive surgery.
Method: From October 2020 to January 2021 we performed a cross-sectional survey among 116 medical students prior to their year of practical training at Christian-Albrechts University in Kiel. Based on their intended field of specialization, the students were divided into a non-surgical and a surgical group. Sociodemographic and psychological characteristics such as self-efficacy expectations, resilience and stress perception were evaluated and compared between groups. Simultaneously, we compared their surgical performance in two laparoscopic exercises and their self-assessment as surgeons. Statistical differences between the training groups were determined by the Mann-Whitney U test or Pearson's Chi square test.
Results: Ninety-two students participated in the study, of whom 64.1% intended to train in a non-surgical specialty and 35.9% in a surgical specialty. Students who wished to be trained as surgeons had higher general self-efficacy expectations (p<0.001) and greater resilience (p=0.009). However, on comparison they had a lower stress level (p=0.047). The inter-group comparison of training results and self-assessment as surgeons revealed no unequivocal differences in surgical performance.
Conclusion: Interest in surgical specialties is correlated, among other factors, with the strength of psychological skills such as general self-efficacy expectations, resilience and stress perception. Early attention to these psychological resources in academic training might assist medical students in future career choices.
在本研究中,我们比较了对外科培训感兴趣的学生与希望选择非外科专业的学生的社会人口学和心理学特征。此外,我们还研究了希望接受外科医生培训的学生在一门旨在学习微创手术技能的课程中的表现是否优于非外科专业的学生:2020年10月至2021年1月,我们对116名医科学生在基尔克里斯蒂安-阿尔布雷希茨大学实习前进行了横断面调查。根据学生的专业意向,他们被分为非手术组和手术组。我们对两组学生的社会人口和心理特征进行了评估和比较,如自我效能预期、适应能力和压力感。同时,我们还比较了他们在两种腹腔镜练习中的手术表现以及他们作为外科医生的自我评估。培训组之间的统计差异通过曼-惠特尼 U 检验或皮尔逊卡方检验来确定:92名学生参加了研究,其中64.1%打算接受非外科专业培训,35.9%打算接受外科专业培训。希望接受外科医生培训的学生的一般自我效能感期望值较高(p 结论:学生对外科专业的兴趣与他们对外科专业的兴趣相关:除其他因素外,对外科专业的兴趣还与心理技能的强弱有关,如一般自我效能感预期、复原力和压力感。在学术培训中尽早关注这些心理资源可能有助于医学生未来的职业选择。
{"title":"Encouraging medical students to become surgeons? Impact of psychological and surgical factors on career choice at medical school.","authors":"Sandra Brügge, Veronika Günther, Ingolf Cascorbi, Nicolai Maass, Zino Ruchay, Martin R Fischer, Johanna Huber, Ibrahim Alkatout","doi":"10.3205/zma001676","DOIUrl":"10.3205/zma001676","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Training decisions are viewed as a problem by the majority of medical students.In the present study we compared sociodemographic and psychological characteristics of students who are interested in surgical training to those who preferred a non-surgical specialty. Furthermore, we examined whether students who wish to be trained as surgeons performed better than their non-surgical counterparts in a course designed to acquire skills in minimally invasive surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>From October 2020 to January 2021 we performed a cross-sectional survey among 116 medical students prior to their year of practical training at Christian-Albrechts University in Kiel. Based on their intended field of specialization, the students were divided into a non-surgical and a surgical group. Sociodemographic and psychological characteristics such as self-efficacy expectations, resilience and stress perception were evaluated and compared between groups. Simultaneously, we compared their surgical performance in two laparoscopic exercises and their self-assessment as surgeons. Statistical differences between the training groups were determined by the Mann-Whitney U test or Pearson's Chi square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-two students participated in the study, of whom 64.1% intended to train in a non-surgical specialty and 35.9% in a surgical specialty. Students who wished to be trained as surgeons had higher general self-efficacy expectations (p<0.001) and greater resilience (p=0.009). However, on comparison they had a lower stress level (p=0.047). The inter-group comparison of training results and self-assessment as surgeons revealed no unequivocal differences in surgical performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interest in surgical specialties is correlated, among other factors, with the strength of psychological skills such as general self-efficacy expectations, resilience and stress perception. Early attention to these psychological resources in academic training might assist medical students in future career choices.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 2","pages":"Doc21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11106567/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141082067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-15eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3205/zma001670
Soumaya Benmaarmar, Hind Bourkhime, Ibtissam El Harch, Karima El Rhazi
Aim: This systematic review aims to investigate the level of empathy among medical students in Arabic speaking countries and analyze its determinants.
Methods: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2022 (PRISMA), the authors conducted a systematic research of studies investigating the level and determinants of empathy among medical students in Arabic speaking countries. The databases PubMed, Scopus, web of science and google scholar were searched.
Results: Ten studies from six countries were included. Nine of which had a cross-sectional study design. Level of empathy was assessed using the Jefferson scale in seven studies and using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index in two studies. The mean of empathy scale ranges between 97.65±14.10 to 106.55±19.16 in studies used the Jefferson scale of empathy. The associated factors with empathy were gender; high levels of empathy were reported in female students. Other factors are explored in relation with empathy such as specialty preference (surgery or medicine, "people-orientated" specialties or ''technology-oriented specialties''), family factors (marital status of parents, satisfactory relationship with parents, parents level of education and household income) and factors related to medical education (academic performance, year of study and type of curriculum) but the results are heterogeneous.
Conclusion: This is the first systematic review, which illustrated the determinants of empathy in Arabic medical students. Our results revealed varied results on empathy determinants. Further studies may guarantee a full exploration of this ability in order to improve the doctor-patient relationship and patient management in the Arab world.
目的:本系统综述旨在调查阿拉伯语国家医学生的移情水平并分析其决定因素:根据《2022 年系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses,PRISMA),作者对调查阿拉伯语国家医学生移情水平及其决定因素的研究进行了系统研究。作者检索了 PubMed、Scopus、web of science 和 google scholar 等数据库:结果:共收录了来自 6 个国家的 10 项研究。结果:共纳入了来自 6 个国家的 10 项研究,其中 9 项采用了横断面研究设计。七项研究使用杰斐逊量表评估了移情水平,两项研究使用人际反应指数评估了移情水平。在使用杰弗逊移情量表的研究中,移情量表的平均值介于(97.65±14.10)和(106.55±19.16)之间。与移情相关的因素是性别;据报告,女生的移情水平较高。研究还探讨了与移情相关的其他因素,如专业偏好(外科或内科、"以人为本 "的专业或 "以技术为本的专业")、家庭因素(父母的婚姻状况、与父母的满意关系、父母的教育水平和家庭收入)以及与医学教育相关的因素(学习成绩、学习年份和课程类型),但结果各不相同:这是首次对阿拉伯医科学生移情的决定因素进行系统回顾。我们的研究结果表明,移情的决定因素各不相同。进一步的研究可确保对这种能力进行全面探索,从而改善阿拉伯世界的医患关系和患者管理。
{"title":"The level and determinants of empathy among medical students from Arabic speaking countries: A systematic review.","authors":"Soumaya Benmaarmar, Hind Bourkhime, Ibtissam El Harch, Karima El Rhazi","doi":"10.3205/zma001670","DOIUrl":"10.3205/zma001670","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This systematic review aims to investigate the level of empathy among medical students in Arabic speaking countries and analyze its determinants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2022 (PRISMA), the authors conducted a systematic research of studies investigating the level and determinants of empathy among medical students in Arabic speaking countries. The databases PubMed, Scopus, web of science and google scholar were searched.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies from six countries were included. Nine of which had a cross-sectional study design. Level of empathy was assessed using the Jefferson scale in seven studies and using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index in two studies. The mean of empathy scale ranges between 97.65±14.10 to 106.55±19.16 in studies used the Jefferson scale of empathy. The associated factors with empathy were gender; high levels of empathy were reported in female students. Other factors are explored in relation with empathy such as specialty preference (surgery or medicine, \"people-orientated\" specialties or ''technology-oriented specialties''), family factors (marital status of parents, satisfactory relationship with parents, parents level of education and household income) and factors related to medical education (academic performance, year of study and type of curriculum) but the results are heterogeneous.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first systematic review, which illustrated the determinants of empathy in Arabic medical students. Our results revealed varied results on empathy determinants. Further studies may guarantee a full exploration of this ability in order to improve the doctor-patient relationship and patient management in the Arab world.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 2","pages":"Doc15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11106575/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141082257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-15eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3205/zma001669
Kai Philipp Schnabel, Andrea Carolin Lörwald, Helmut Beltraminelli, Miria Germano, Beate Gabriele Brem, Sandra Wüst, Daniel Bauer
Modern medical moulages are becoming increasingly important in simulation-based health professions education. Their lifelikeness is important so that simulation engagement is not disrupted while their standardization is crucial in high-stakes exams. This report describes in detail how three-dimensional transfers are developed and produced so that educators will be able to develop their own. In addition, evaluation findings and lessons learnt from deploying transfers in summative assessments are shared. Step-by-step instructions are given for the creation and application of transfers, including materials and photographic visualizations. We also examined feedback on 10 exam stations (out of a total of 81) with self-developed three-dimensional transfers and complement this with additional lessons learnt. By the time of submission, the authors successfully developed and deployed over 40 different three-dimensional transfers representing different clinical findings in high-stakes exams using the techniques explained in this article or variations thereof. Feedback from students and examiners after completing the OSCE is predominantly positive, with lifelikeness being the quality most often commented upon. Caveats derived from feedback and own experiences are included. The step-by-step approach reported can be adapted and replicated by healthcare educators to build their own three-dimensional transfers. This should widen the scope and the lifelikeness of their simulations. At the same time we propose that this level of lifelikeness should be expected by learners as not to disrupt simulation engagement. Our evaluation of their use in high-stakes assessments suggests they are both useful and accepted.
{"title":"Development and evaluation of three-dimensional transfers to depict skin conditions in simulation-based education.","authors":"Kai Philipp Schnabel, Andrea Carolin Lörwald, Helmut Beltraminelli, Miria Germano, Beate Gabriele Brem, Sandra Wüst, Daniel Bauer","doi":"10.3205/zma001669","DOIUrl":"10.3205/zma001669","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Modern medical moulages are becoming increasingly important in simulation-based health professions education. Their lifelikeness is important so that simulation engagement is not disrupted while their standardization is crucial in high-stakes exams. This report describes in detail how three-dimensional transfers are developed and produced so that educators will be able to develop their own. In addition, evaluation findings and lessons learnt from deploying transfers in summative assessments are shared. Step-by-step instructions are given for the creation and application of transfers, including materials and photographic visualizations. We also examined feedback on 10 exam stations (out of a total of 81) with self-developed three-dimensional transfers and complement this with additional lessons learnt. By the time of submission, the authors successfully developed and deployed over 40 different three-dimensional transfers representing different clinical findings in high-stakes exams using the techniques explained in this article or variations thereof. Feedback from students and examiners after completing the OSCE is predominantly positive, with lifelikeness being the quality most often commented upon. Caveats derived from feedback and own experiences are included. The step-by-step approach reported can be adapted and replicated by healthcare educators to build their own three-dimensional transfers. This should widen the scope and the lifelikeness of their simulations. At the same time we propose that this level of lifelikeness should be expected by learners as not to disrupt simulation engagement. Our evaluation of their use in high-stakes assessments suggests they are both useful and accepted.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 2","pages":"Doc14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11106571/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141082066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-15eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3205/zma001675
Matthias Stadler, Anna Horrer, Martin R Fischer
As medical educators grapple with the consistent demand for high-quality assessments, the integration of artificial intelligence presents a novel solution. This how-to article delves into the mechanics of employing ChatGPT for generating Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) within the medical curriculum. Focusing on the intricacies of prompt engineering, we elucidate the steps and considerations imperative for achieving targeted, high-fidelity results. The article presents varying outcomes based on different prompt structures, highlighting the AI's adaptability in producing questions of distinct complexities. While emphasizing the transformative potential of ChatGPT, we also spotlight challenges, including the AI's occasional "hallucination", underscoring the importance of rigorous review. This guide aims to furnish educators with the know-how to integrate AI into their assessment creation process, heralding a new era in medical education tools.
{"title":"Crafting medical MCQs with generative AI: A how-to guide on leveraging ChatGPT.","authors":"Matthias Stadler, Anna Horrer, Martin R Fischer","doi":"10.3205/zma001675","DOIUrl":"10.3205/zma001675","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As medical educators grapple with the consistent demand for high-quality assessments, the integration of artificial intelligence presents a novel solution. This how-to article delves into the mechanics of employing ChatGPT for generating Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) within the medical curriculum. Focusing on the intricacies of prompt engineering, we elucidate the steps and considerations imperative for achieving targeted, high-fidelity results. The article presents varying outcomes based on different prompt structures, highlighting the AI's adaptability in producing questions of distinct complexities. While emphasizing the transformative potential of ChatGPT, we also spotlight challenges, including the AI's occasional \"hallucination\", underscoring the importance of rigorous review. This guide aims to furnish educators with the know-how to integrate AI into their assessment creation process, heralding a new era in medical education tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 2","pages":"Doc20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11106576/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141082096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-15eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3205/zma001677
Eckhart G Hahn
The Bündnis Junger Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ, Alliance of Young Physicians in Germany) has presented a position paper (PP) on Postgraduate Medical Education (PGME) against the background of an unfolding hospital reform in Germany, and they describe existing deficits of PGME in Germany. Based on this, demands were made of legislators, employers and medical associations which could result in a sweeping reformation of PGME. Hospital reforms can only be accomplished with well trained and motivated physicians. In this respect the BJÄ regards the reform of hospitals and the health-care system as a chance for a reform of PGME, which is long overdue. Legislative competence for PGME lies with the States of the Federal Republic of Germany and this warrants an adjustment of state medical association laws to accommodate the demands of the BJÄ. Generally PGME must be taken into consideration in all health-care legislation, in analogy to the meanwhile globally adopted principle of "Health in all Politics (HiAP)". The BJÄ has made every endeavour to produce this PP. The responsible stakeholders and actors in the health-care system would be well-advised to take the position paper seriously with a dwindling physician work force in hospitals and serious quality deficits in PGME. Hence, the BJÄ must be comprehensively supported. They need congenial partners to define the scientific foundation of all their demands, to test their application under real life conditions in hospital and outpatient care, to pursue research on the impact on patient care and on the intended transformation of the health-care system. This might best be accomplished by partnering with a scientific Association for Postgraduate Medical Education as has been the case in many countries for decades.
{"title":"Position paper on postgraduate medical education on the occasion of hospital reform - postgraduate medical education must be considered. A joint position paper by Bündnis Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte and AG Junge Gastroenterologie of the DGVS as well as the Young DGN.","authors":"Eckhart G Hahn","doi":"10.3205/zma001677","DOIUrl":"10.3205/zma001677","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Bündnis Junger Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ, Alliance of Young Physicians in Germany) has presented a position paper (PP) on Postgraduate Medical Education (PGME) against the background of an unfolding hospital reform in Germany, and they describe existing deficits of PGME in Germany. Based on this, demands were made of legislators, employers and medical associations which could result in a sweeping reformation of PGME. Hospital reforms can only be accomplished with well trained and motivated physicians. In this respect the BJÄ regards the reform of hospitals and the health-care system as a chance for a reform of PGME, which is long overdue. Legislative competence for PGME lies with the States of the Federal Republic of Germany and this warrants an adjustment of state medical association laws to accommodate the demands of the BJÄ. Generally PGME must be taken into consideration in all health-care legislation, in analogy to the meanwhile globally adopted principle of \"Health in all Politics (HiAP)\". The BJÄ has made every endeavour to produce this PP. The responsible stakeholders and actors in the health-care system would be well-advised to take the position paper seriously with a dwindling physician work force in hospitals and serious quality deficits in PGME. Hence, the BJÄ must be comprehensively supported. They need congenial partners to define the scientific foundation of all their demands, to test their application under real life conditions in hospital and outpatient care, to pursue research on the impact on patient care and on the intended transformation of the health-care system. This might best be accomplished by partnering with a scientific <i>Association for Postgraduate Medical Education</i> as has been the case in many countries for decades.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 2","pages":"Doc22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11106573/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141082250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-15eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3205/zma001674
Nicolas Haverkamp, Janina Barth, Dennis Schmidt, Uta Dahmen, Oliver Keis, Tobias Raupach
The evaluation of teaching can be an essential driver for curriculum development. Instruments for teaching evaluation are not only used for the purpose of quality assurance but also in the context of medical education research. Therefore, they must meet the common requirements for reliability and validity. This position paper from the GMA Teaching Evaluation Committee discusses strategic and methodological aspects of evaluation in the context of undergraduate medical education and related courses; and formulates recommendations for the further development of evaluation. First, a four-step approach to the design and implementation of evaluations is presented, then methodological and practical aspects are discussed in more detail. The focus here is on target and confounding variables, survey instruments as well as aspects of implementation and data protection. Finally, possible consequences from evaluation data for the four dimensions of teaching quality (structural and procedural aspects, teachers and outcomes) are discussed.
{"title":"Position statement of the GMA committee \"teaching evaluation\".","authors":"Nicolas Haverkamp, Janina Barth, Dennis Schmidt, Uta Dahmen, Oliver Keis, Tobias Raupach","doi":"10.3205/zma001674","DOIUrl":"10.3205/zma001674","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The evaluation of teaching can be an essential driver for curriculum development. Instruments for teaching evaluation are not only used for the purpose of quality assurance but also in the context of medical education research. Therefore, they must meet the common requirements for reliability and validity. This position paper from the GMA Teaching Evaluation Committee discusses strategic and methodological aspects of evaluation in the context of undergraduate medical education and related courses; and formulates recommendations for the further development of evaluation. First, a four-step approach to the design and implementation of evaluations is presented, then methodological and practical aspects are discussed in more detail. The focus here is on target and confounding variables, survey instruments as well as aspects of implementation and data protection. Finally, possible consequences from evaluation data for the four dimensions of teaching quality (structural and procedural aspects, teachers and outcomes) are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 2","pages":"Doc19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11106570/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141082253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-15eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3205/zma001673
Franziska Baessler, Ali Zafar, Katja Koelkebeck, Thomas Frodl, Jörg Signerski-Krieger, Severin Pinilla, Gottfried M Barth, Deborah Jannowitz, Sven Speerforck, Daniela Roesch-Ely, Ina Kluge, Miriam Aust, Janine Utz, Gian-Marco Kersten, Philipp Spitzer
Objectives: Physicians and psychologists at psychiatric university hospitals are assigned teaching tasks from the first day of work without necessarily having the prerequisite training in teaching methods. This exploratory survey provides a needs-based analysis for the prospective didactic training of physicians and psychologists at psychiatric hospitals in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.
Methods: An online questionnaire was distributed at medical schools via email in German-speaking countries in Europe. All physicians involved in teaching medical students at psychiatry faculties were eligible to participate in the survey. Participants were further requested to recruit eligible participants (snowball sampling). Responses were analyzed descriptively, and differences between groups were calculated using nonparametric Mann-Whitney U tests (p<.05).
Results: Overall, 97 respondents (male=55, female=42; mean age= 40.6) from 19 medical schools completed the survey. The respondents consisted of 43 residents, 39 specialists, 6 chief physicians and 9 psychologists. Of the respondents, 97.6% rated didactic competence as either highly relevant or rather relevant for teaching medical students. The highest overall interest was shown for bedside teaching (mode=4; IQR: 2-4) and error culture (mode=3; IQR: 2-4). Respondents expressed the highest training needs for topics regarding presentation and communication (mode=3; IQR: 2-3). Resident physicians were significantly more interested in bedside teaching (U=362.0, p=0.004) and roleplay (U=425.0; p=0.036) than specialist physicians, who were more interested in examination didactics (U=415.0; p=0.022). Chief physicians displayed significantly deeper interest in group dynamics (U=51; p=0.023) than specialist physicians. In-person training was preferred by a majority of respondents, and 27.4% preferred online/web-based training.
Conclusions: The majority of physicians and psychologists at psychiatric university hospitals considered professional development for faculty to be helpful for teaching medical students. Bedside teaching and error culture management were the most desired teaching topics for training medical teachers. Tailored educational interventions are recommended, with target-oriented priorities for different hierarchical levels.
{"title":"What do the teachers want? A targeted needs assessment survey for prospective didactic training of psychiatry medical educators.","authors":"Franziska Baessler, Ali Zafar, Katja Koelkebeck, Thomas Frodl, Jörg Signerski-Krieger, Severin Pinilla, Gottfried M Barth, Deborah Jannowitz, Sven Speerforck, Daniela Roesch-Ely, Ina Kluge, Miriam Aust, Janine Utz, Gian-Marco Kersten, Philipp Spitzer","doi":"10.3205/zma001673","DOIUrl":"10.3205/zma001673","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Physicians and psychologists at psychiatric university hospitals are assigned teaching tasks from the first day of work without necessarily having the prerequisite training in teaching methods. This exploratory survey provides a needs-based analysis for the prospective didactic training of physicians and psychologists at psychiatric hospitals in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online questionnaire was distributed at medical schools via email in German-speaking countries in Europe. All physicians involved in teaching medical students at psychiatry faculties were eligible to participate in the survey. Participants were further requested to recruit eligible participants (snowball sampling). Responses were analyzed descriptively, and differences between groups were calculated using nonparametric Mann-Whitney U tests (p<.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 97 respondents (male=55, female=42; mean age= 40.6) from 19 medical schools completed the survey. The respondents consisted of 43 residents, 39 specialists, 6 chief physicians and 9 psychologists. Of the respondents, 97.6% rated didactic competence as either highly relevant or rather relevant for teaching medical students. The highest overall interest was shown for bedside teaching (mode=4; IQR: 2-4) and error culture (mode=3; IQR: 2-4). Respondents expressed the highest training needs for topics regarding presentation and communication (mode=3; IQR: 2-3). Resident physicians were significantly more interested in bedside teaching (U=362.0, p=0.004) and roleplay (U=425.0; p=0.036) than specialist physicians, who were more interested in examination didactics (U=415.0; p=0.022). Chief physicians displayed significantly deeper interest in group dynamics (U=51; p=0.023) than specialist physicians. In-person training was preferred by a majority of respondents, and 27.4% preferred online/web-based training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of physicians and psychologists at psychiatric university hospitals considered professional development for faculty to be helpful for teaching medical students. Bedside teaching and error culture management were the most desired teaching topics for training medical teachers. Tailored educational interventions are recommended, with target-oriented priorities for different hierarchical levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 2","pages":"Doc18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11106569/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141082302","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}