GMS Journal for Medical Education最新文献

Objectives: Physicians often avoid discussing sexual and gender-related health with patients due to discomfort and fear of causing offense, leading to incomplete sexual histories and gaps in care, particularly affecting LGBTQI+ patients who face significant health disparities. This project aimed to address this gap by introducing an elective course titled "Sexuality and Society in the Medical Context" to provide German medical students with the skills and knowledge necessary for effective sexual health discussions.

Methods: The course utilized interactive teaching methods, including peer learning and role-playing. Topics covered ranged from sexually transmitted infections to gender diversity and LGBTQI+ health. Student feedback was collected through a structured evaluation to assess the course's impact and effectiveness.

Results: Student feedback was highly positive; with participants highlighting the course's engaging format and relevance to their medical education. The evaluation showed high satisfaction with the course's organization, content, and interactive elements.

Conclusion: Although the elective course was well received, its limited scope suggests the need to integrate similar training into the core medical curriculum. This integration is crucial for enabling future physicians to systematically address sexual health issues, overcome systematic biases, and foster a supportive environment for all patients.

Aim: 2021 saw the publication of the new version (2.0) of the "National Competency-based Catalogue of Learning Objectives (NKLM) in Undergraduate Medicine", which in future will be closely linked to the German medical licensing regulations (ÄApprO). Included in the updated catalogue are specifically defined competencies concerning practical clinical skills. We aimed to determine how residents perceive their competency level to perform selected practical clinical skills in the NKLM 2.0.

Method: In June 2022, all 593 medical residents registered at the competence centers for postgraduate training in primary care in North Rhine, Westphalia-Lippe and Schleswig-Holstein were invited to participate in an online survey. The participants were asked to retrospectively self-assess (1) their proficiency level (5-point Likert scale) at the beginning of their postgraduate training in regard to 36 practical clinical skills from the NKLM 2.0 and (2) where they had gained proficiency in those skills. Of the 164 participating residents, the main focus was on those who had been licensed for less than five years.

Results: The responses of 47 residents were analyzed. For 29 skills, at least 20% of the participants stated that these had not been proficiently mastered at the start of postgraduate training; e.g., examining the spine of an adult (19.6%) or the skin (37.0%). For 14 skills - such as examining female and male genitalia and those of newborns and infants - more than 50% of the participants indicated that they had not been able to perform these skills.

Conclusion: The results provide initial evidence that discrepancies may exist between the level of desired competency by the end of undergraduate medical education, as specified by the NKLM, and the level of proficiency actually achieved in terms of practical clinical skills. More teaching and feedback methods may need to be established to impart these skills during undergraduate medical education and to integrate these skills into complex clinical contexts.

Objective: Through the digital transformation the everyday working life of nursing staff and the demands made on them are steadily changing. To meet these demands, Bachelor students need to learn appropriate "digital" skills during their courses. This study aimed at developing a module that imparts these digital skills. It was not clear which concrete skills the students should acquire and which topics should therefore be dealt with in the module.

Methods: 24 semi-structured guide-based interviews with experts were carried out and analyzed with qualitative content analysis. The experts came from the field of science, technology manufacturing, practical applications/practitioners and pedagogics.

Results: We identified 4 different areas of skills: (1) organizing successful collaboration with patients, relatives and other professionals (doctors, therapists, IT); (2) supporting patients and relatives in the use of assistive technologies; (3) planning and implementing projects related to assistive technologies (4) managing lifelong learning in relation to assistive technologies. A reflective use of digital technologies in patient care and the education of patients and relatives were described as key qualifications.

Conclusions: On the basis of the different assessments of the experts, it was possible to identify and discuss a wide range of digital skills. This can be used to define learning objectives for appropriate modules or to evaluate existing ones. The study therefore contributes to evidence-based teaching.

Background: Simulation-based medical education is increasingly important in postgraduate training, yet the comparative merits of in-house vs. society-accredited courses are still not well understood. This study examined these two approaches in three emergency medicine domains - prehospital, pediatric, and adult - to identify their respective strengths and potential limitations.

Methods: In a retrospective analysis, 1,263 participants from 57 sessions (2019-2023) evaluated six emergency medicine courses (three society-accredited, three in-house). A 25-item Likert-scale survey assessed aspects of course content, delivery, organization, and overall recommendation, alongside demographic questions and free-text comments. Mann-Whitney U tests and Cliff's Delta were used for statistical comparisons.

Results: Society-accredited courses generally scored higher on guideline adherence, presenter competence, and practical relevance, whereas in-house formats excelled in areas like content scope and communication. Participant specialty, workplace, and training stage influenced ratings. Free-text feedback praised hands-on learning and small-group design but called for earlier material distribution, better logistics, and clearer guidelines.

Conclusions: Both in-house and society-accredited SBME courses exhibit distinct strengths. Adopting best practices from both models, may guide a hybrid approach that optimizes SBME outcomes. However, reliance on self-reported data and a lack of controls for instructor competence or teaching style limit generalizability. Future research should include a broader sample, more rigorous content analysis, longitudinal follow-up, and detailed participant experience data to enhance the depth and applicability of findings.

Introduction: Stays abroad in the form of study visits and clinical traineeships, for example, have been rare in dentistry degree programmes in Germany to date. The new ZApprO (date of issue: 8 July 2019) offers the opportunity to integrate stays abroad into the degree programme through the introduction of modules, ECTS points and clinical traineeships, among other things. The aim of this study was to analyse the student perspective on this topic.

Methodology: In the summer term of 2021, a voluntary and anonymous online survey was conducted among dental students at the University of Münster. In addition to demographic data, the questionnaire also included key questions on content.

Results: With a response rate of 55%, a total of 371 students took part in the survey. 96% of the study participants stated that they would like to gain experience abroad as part of their studies, almost half of them even in the case of missing or only partial recognition of academic achievements. This includes clinical traineeships (30%) and semester-long stays (32%) or both (28%). The loss of time in the progression of studies, financing as well as time-consuming planning and family obligations are the most frequently cited reasons against a stay abroad.

Conclusion: The survey shows a very high level of interest among dental students in university-supported stays abroad. This includes both shorter periods of time, such as clinical traineeships, as well as longer stays, e.g. as part of Erasmus collaboration programmes. Based on the results, university-supported stays abroad should be made possible.

Objective: Experiences of discrimination in the context of medical care are not uncommon and have a significant impact on the health of those affected. For this reason, an elective course (28 units) on "dealing with discrimination in medical communication" was introduced at University Hospital Jena for medical students in the clinical section, which aims to improve the communicative skills of future doctors with marginalized patients. The course was tested for the first time in the winter semester 2023/24. The evaluation was used to check whether the course is suitable for expanding knowledge and skills in dealing with discrimination, as assessed by the students themselves.

Methodology: The course includes discrimination-sensitive treatment of blind/visually impaired patients, trans*/non-binary patients, patients with right-wing extremist attitudes and/or conspiracy beliefs, people without health insurance, as well as racism- and trauma-sensitive treatment and the use of language mediation. The course also contained numerous elements for self-reflection and reflection on one's own professional attitude as a doctor. The self-assessment of knowledge and competence gains is based on an online survey at the beginning of the first course and at the end of the last session.

Results: The participating students (N=13) had hardly had any contact with the content of the seminar series through their medical studies, although they rated the relevance for their own practical work as high. The evaluation of the pre- and post-survey showed that completing the course led to significant increases in self-assessed knowledge for all course topics. There was an increase in self-assessed competence, particularly in relation to dealing with blind/visually impaired people, traumatized people and the use of interpreters. The ability to self-reflect and deal with one's own weaknesses, as well as the awareness of recognizing discrimination, was rated significantly higher also.

Conclusion: The newly designed elective subject could help to subjectively improve medical students' knowledge and skills in dealing with discrimination in medical communication. The findings thus provide a good basis for the development of further teaching concepts.

We propose a new approach to deriving minimum standards for scientific training in medical studies. This approach allows specific learning objectives to be clearly defined and presented, in an easily comprehensible manner. We contend that a fundamental prerequisite for university studies is the instruction in the systematic scientific method that can be described through the scientific cycle. This instruction provides the foundation for the acquisition of scientific knowledge and evidence-based practice in medicine.

Objectives: The research focused on the recommendations of the International Council of Ophthalmology, specifically regarding the duration of ophthalmology education, areas of clinical exposure, essential skills, and adherence to these standards internationally.

Methodology: A thorough search was conducted in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ERIC databases up to April 2024 to identify studies related to International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO) principles in undergraduate medical education. Two independent reviewers assessed citations for inclusion criteria, gathered data, and evaluated the risk of bias using the ROBIN-I tool, PROSPERO CRD42024517718.

Findings: From 537 unique references, only eight research articles qualified for inclusion. The primary educational aim in most studies was to meet the ICO requirements. Typically, medical students spend at least two weeks focusing on ophthalmology. These courses offer extensive exposure to ophthalmic patients across diverse clinical environments, such as ophthalmology clinics, emergency departments, and surgical theaters. Instructional methods include theoretical lectures, small group discussions, self-directed learning, and hands-on clinical experiences. The study found that the adoption of ICO recommendations varied from 20% to 36%.

Conclusions: This research evaluates how undergraduate ophthalmology education in medical schools correlates with ICO guidelines, indicating that implementation remains limited. Enhanced promotion of these standards in educational institutions is essential, alongside further studies.

Background: Given demographic changes and a rising prevalence of oncological diseases, understanding the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and a timely integration of palliative care is crucial. However, both are underrepresented in medical curricula. To address this gap, we introduced a new elective in which students follow the journey of a fictitious patient with prostate cancer from diagnosis until death.

Method: The elective was conducted through repeated joint meetings by a multi-professional and interdisciplinary (palliative care, urology, radiation oncology, psychosomatic medicine) team. Alongside its development, an outcome evaluation was designed to assess satisfaction (Likert scale) and learning gains (comparative self-assessment, CSA [%]). After pilot testing, the content and structure were adapted. The elective followed a blended learning approach. The content covered guideline-adherent treatment of prostate cancer, breaking bad news, initial contact with palliative care, symptom control based on the total pain concept.

Results: Students (n=8) expressed high satisfaction. They found the structure comprehensible and considered the content valuable for medical practice. Students gained knowledge, especially in defining total pain (83%) and the indication of the timely integration of specialized palliative care (77%).

Conclusion: Using prostate cancer as an example disease, we integrated multiple disciplines into treatment strategies, demonstrating the benefits of multi-professional and multidisciplinary collaboration. This approach aids in identifying patients who could benefit from palliative care. Our concept is adaptable to other tumor types and settings, enhancing awareness of patient-centered issues that are often overlooked in medical curricula.