Pub Date : 2022-11-21DOI: 10.1080/10901027.2022.2147882
Kyunghwa Kay Park, Chavis Lickvar-Armstrong, Eva M. Horn
ABSTRACT This article proposes a reconceptualization of the relationship between two early childhood professional standards, the Professional Standards and Competencies for Early Childhood Educators (NAEYC, 2019) and the Practice-Based Professional Preparation Standards for Early Interventionists/Early Childhood Special Educators (CEC & DEC, 2020), from an aligned or a parallel approach to an integration approach that advances the shared equity agenda in early childhood education. In the integrative approach, the ECE Standards are viewed as the foundation for educating all children with diverse social identities (i.e., ability, race, language, socioeconomic) and the EI/ECSE Standards as the expansion on the foundation specifically for children with differing abilities. A rationale is provided for integrating the standards and the process of integration is exemplified around three broad themes central to both sets of standards: inclusion and diversity, responsive and relevant practices, and building partnerships. Integrating the two professional standards will guide educator preparation programs for inclusion, provide clarity and unity around the knowledge and competencies of early childhood professionals across settings, and unify the workforce in ECE and EI/ECSE for the shared goal of promoting inclusion and equity. Our aim is for the audience to consider the integrative approach as a conceptual framework for building shared values, visions, and knowledge in ECE and EI/ECSE to promote inclusive, equitable early childhood learning opportunities and to unify educators around the shared equity agenda.
{"title":"Integration of ECE and EI/ECSE personnel preparation standards: going beyond alignment","authors":"Kyunghwa Kay Park, Chavis Lickvar-Armstrong, Eva M. Horn","doi":"10.1080/10901027.2022.2147882","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2022.2147882","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article proposes a reconceptualization of the relationship between two early childhood professional standards, the Professional Standards and Competencies for Early Childhood Educators (NAEYC, 2019) and the Practice-Based Professional Preparation Standards for Early Interventionists/Early Childhood Special Educators (CEC & DEC, 2020), from an aligned or a parallel approach to an integration approach that advances the shared equity agenda in early childhood education. In the integrative approach, the ECE Standards are viewed as the foundation for educating all children with diverse social identities (i.e., ability, race, language, socioeconomic) and the EI/ECSE Standards as the expansion on the foundation specifically for children with differing abilities. A rationale is provided for integrating the standards and the process of integration is exemplified around three broad themes central to both sets of standards: inclusion and diversity, responsive and relevant practices, and building partnerships. Integrating the two professional standards will guide educator preparation programs for inclusion, provide clarity and unity around the knowledge and competencies of early childhood professionals across settings, and unify the workforce in ECE and EI/ECSE for the shared goal of promoting inclusion and equity. Our aim is for the audience to consider the integrative approach as a conceptual framework for building shared values, visions, and knowledge in ECE and EI/ECSE to promote inclusive, equitable early childhood learning opportunities and to unify educators around the shared equity agenda.","PeriodicalId":45981,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"184 - 198"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46482015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-16DOI: 10.1080/10901027.2022.2147881
S. Saraç, Betul Tarhan, Hülya Gülay Ogelman
ABSTRACT The study aims to reveal preschool teacher candidates’ online practicum experiences during the pandemic – the teacher candidates connected to preschool classes online while the children were face-to-face with their class teachers. The participants of this phenomenological study were 18 preschool teacher candidates studying at a public university in Turkey. Data were collected via individual interviews, micro-teaching observations, and portfolios. Thematic content analysis was used for data analysis. The results showed that teacher candidates had to deal with technical problems. Still, they gained experience teaching online with young children and improved their digital skills and technological pedagogical content knowledge. They did not have the opportunity to develop teaching self-efficacy for face-to-face education. Teacher candidates especially expressed their concerns about classroom management and bonding with children.
{"title":"Online practicum during pandemic: “they’re in the classroom but i’m online”","authors":"S. Saraç, Betul Tarhan, Hülya Gülay Ogelman","doi":"10.1080/10901027.2022.2147881","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2022.2147881","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The study aims to reveal preschool teacher candidates’ online practicum experiences during the pandemic – the teacher candidates connected to preschool classes online while the children were face-to-face with their class teachers. The participants of this phenomenological study were 18 preschool teacher candidates studying at a public university in Turkey. Data were collected via individual interviews, micro-teaching observations, and portfolios. Thematic content analysis was used for data analysis. The results showed that teacher candidates had to deal with technical problems. Still, they gained experience teaching online with young children and improved their digital skills and technological pedagogical content knowledge. They did not have the opportunity to develop teaching self-efficacy for face-to-face education. Teacher candidates especially expressed their concerns about classroom management and bonding with children.","PeriodicalId":45981,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44812566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-27DOI: 10.1080/10901027.2022.2136550
C. Catalano, Helenrose Fives, Nicole Barnes
ABSTRACT We developed and validated an instrument, the Teacher Self-efficacy for Teaching Students with ASD Inclusive Early Childhood Classrooms Scale: TSE-ASDI/EC, to determine teachers’ self-efficacy for teaching students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in inclusive early childhood classrooms. We engaged in literature and expert reviews followed by cognitive pre-testing with pre-service and in-service early childhood teachers. Next, we employed a series of analytic techniques to examine the factor structure, reliability, and relationships among the dimensions of the instrument for the entire sample and by subgroups. We provide evidence for validity based on test content, response process, internal structure of the instrument, and relations to other variables. This led to a unidimensional, 16-item scale to measure general education teachers’ self-efficacy for educating students with ASD in inclusive early childhood classrooms. Based on these findings we discuss implications for research and practice.
{"title":"Developing and validating the teacher self-efficacy for teaching students with autism spectrum disorder in inclusive early childhood classrooms","authors":"C. Catalano, Helenrose Fives, Nicole Barnes","doi":"10.1080/10901027.2022.2136550","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2022.2136550","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We developed and validated an instrument, the Teacher Self-efficacy for Teaching Students with ASD Inclusive Early Childhood Classrooms Scale: TSE-ASDI/EC, to determine teachers’ self-efficacy for teaching students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in inclusive early childhood classrooms. We engaged in literature and expert reviews followed by cognitive pre-testing with pre-service and in-service early childhood teachers. Next, we employed a series of analytic techniques to examine the factor structure, reliability, and relationships among the dimensions of the instrument for the entire sample and by subgroups. We provide evidence for validity based on test content, response process, internal structure of the instrument, and relations to other variables. This led to a unidimensional, 16-item scale to measure general education teachers’ self-efficacy for educating students with ASD in inclusive early childhood classrooms. Based on these findings we discuss implications for research and practice.","PeriodicalId":45981,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"598 - 621"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42283852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-27DOI: 10.1080/10901027.2022.2136552
Uyen Tran Ho, Ben A. LePage, W. Fang
ABSTRACT In this study, the environmental education (EE) component of the pre-school teacher training programs at six (6) universities in Vietnam were examined to identify the challenges of implementing EE in these programs. The framework for the pre-school teacher training program at these universities were analyzed and 18 students in their final year of undergraduate study were interviewed to collect the qualitative data used in this analysis. The findings indicated that there was a clear gap between EE and the training of pre-service teachers pursuing a pre-school teaching-level certification rating with EE competencies. Program comparisons between the universities show a disparity in the program designer’s EE views that reflect the priority given to environmentally-related courses. This study also recommends that it is necessary to implement innovative EE methods; integrate EE in all subject areas; and promote knowledge exchange between the teachers and delivery methods with the goal of systematically and comprehensively preparing prospective pre-school teachers to be EE practitioners for children.
{"title":"Environmental education in pre-school teacher training programs in Vietnam: situations and challenges","authors":"Uyen Tran Ho, Ben A. LePage, W. Fang","doi":"10.1080/10901027.2022.2136552","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2022.2136552","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this study, the environmental education (EE) component of the pre-school teacher training programs at six (6) universities in Vietnam were examined to identify the challenges of implementing EE in these programs. The framework for the pre-school teacher training program at these universities were analyzed and 18 students in their final year of undergraduate study were interviewed to collect the qualitative data used in this analysis. The findings indicated that there was a clear gap between EE and the training of pre-service teachers pursuing a pre-school teaching-level certification rating with EE competencies. Program comparisons between the universities show a disparity in the program designer’s EE views that reflect the priority given to environmentally-related courses. This study also recommends that it is necessary to implement innovative EE methods; integrate EE in all subject areas; and promote knowledge exchange between the teachers and delivery methods with the goal of systematically and comprehensively preparing prospective pre-school teachers to be EE practitioners for children.","PeriodicalId":45981,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43233333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-19DOI: 10.1080/10901027.2022.2125464
Bridget A Walsh, M. Innocenti, Patricia H. Manz, Start Early, G. Cook, Hyun-Joo Jeon
ABSTRACT Coaching has received attention in early childhood education, early intervention, and family science. In the home visiting field, coaching is a distinct professional development tool to improve home visitor effectiveness in meeting the complex needs of families, improve child development outcomes, and meet home visiting field priorities (e.g., home visitor recruitment, retention, and training). Home visitors dually serve in roles as coachees when receiving professional development and as coaches for the families with whom they work. This article focuses on the roles of home visitors as coaches and as coachees. We explore justifications for coaching, models of coaching, the timing of coaching, being recipients of coaching, and the delivery of coaching to recipients. This paper underscores the complexity involved in coaching in the home visiting field and the need for further research to develop a framework and procedures for coaching best practices. Using our exploration of home visitors as coaches and coachees, we propose implications for higher education.
{"title":"Conceptualizing coaching within the home visiting field","authors":"Bridget A Walsh, M. Innocenti, Patricia H. Manz, Start Early, G. Cook, Hyun-Joo Jeon","doi":"10.1080/10901027.2022.2125464","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2022.2125464","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Coaching has received attention in early childhood education, early intervention, and family science. In the home visiting field, coaching is a distinct professional development tool to improve home visitor effectiveness in meeting the complex needs of families, improve child development outcomes, and meet home visiting field priorities (e.g., home visitor recruitment, retention, and training). Home visitors dually serve in roles as coachees when receiving professional development and as coaches for the families with whom they work. This article focuses on the roles of home visitors as coaches and as coachees. We explore justifications for coaching, models of coaching, the timing of coaching, being recipients of coaching, and the delivery of coaching to recipients. This paper underscores the complexity involved in coaching in the home visiting field and the need for further research to develop a framework and procedures for coaching best practices. Using our exploration of home visitors as coaches and coachees, we propose implications for higher education.","PeriodicalId":45981,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44883688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-19DOI: 10.1080/10901027.2022.2136551
Niina Salonen, S. Havu-Nuutinen
ABSTRACT This qualitative study examines the professional development of early education preservice teachers and the initiatives behind the formation of a professional identity in the early stages of their studies. Professional identity is examined through the motivational factors that guide students to a minor in early education. The theoretical framework draws on educational science and sociology and defines the context of professional development, professional identity, and motivation in the social environment. Narrative data have been analyzed using the FIT-Choice Scale, and the analysis has been further elaborated by classifying narratives into the three identity types of confident, strengthened, and cautious. The research mainly confirms international results on motivational factors influencing career choices in teaching. The results also provide a broader perspective on the impact of the local education system and the labor market on professional development and the formation of professional identity. Additionally, the results challenge the ideal of the preservice teacher. The research benefits not only teacher educators but also policy makers as well as preservice teachers who form their professional identity in the midst of various uncertainties and requirements.
{"title":"Emerging professional identities: motivations for choosing early education as a minor subject in Finland","authors":"Niina Salonen, S. Havu-Nuutinen","doi":"10.1080/10901027.2022.2136551","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2022.2136551","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This qualitative study examines the professional development of early education preservice teachers and the initiatives behind the formation of a professional identity in the early stages of their studies. Professional identity is examined through the motivational factors that guide students to a minor in early education. The theoretical framework draws on educational science and sociology and defines the context of professional development, professional identity, and motivation in the social environment. Narrative data have been analyzed using the FIT-Choice Scale, and the analysis has been further elaborated by classifying narratives into the three identity types of confident, strengthened, and cautious. The research mainly confirms international results on motivational factors influencing career choices in teaching. The results also provide a broader perspective on the impact of the local education system and the labor market on professional development and the formation of professional identity. Additionally, the results challenge the ideal of the preservice teacher. The research benefits not only teacher educators but also policy makers as well as preservice teachers who form their professional identity in the midst of various uncertainties and requirements.","PeriodicalId":45981,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49240612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-21DOI: 10.1080/10901027.2022.2125462
Larisa Callaway-Cole, Talya Drescher
ABSTRACT Two instructors collaborated across programs in a School of Education to bring mixed reality simulation to preservice early childhood educators in an effort to utilize content knowledge to practice challenging conversations. The scenario chosen was a parent-teacher conference focused on supporting a child with disabilities in an inclusive early childhood preschool classroom. The authors discuss the process of implementing mixed reality simulation in Early Childhood Studies and potential implications for lifelong impact of family engagement throughout a child’s schooling experiences and the use of mixed reality in teacher preparation. Interdisciplinary collaboration across programs within a school of education are considered.
{"title":"Reflections on the use of mixed reality to prepare early childhood educators to support diverse family needs","authors":"Larisa Callaway-Cole, Talya Drescher","doi":"10.1080/10901027.2022.2125462","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2022.2125462","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Two instructors collaborated across programs in a School of Education to bring mixed reality simulation to preservice early childhood educators in an effort to utilize content knowledge to practice challenging conversations. The scenario chosen was a parent-teacher conference focused on supporting a child with disabilities in an inclusive early childhood preschool classroom. The authors discuss the process of implementing mixed reality simulation in Early Childhood Studies and potential implications for lifelong impact of family engagement throughout a child’s schooling experiences and the use of mixed reality in teacher preparation. Interdisciplinary collaboration across programs within a school of education are considered.","PeriodicalId":45981,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45332990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-20DOI: 10.1080/10901027.2022.2125465
Joanna Englehardt, Christopher P. Brown
ABSTRACT Policymakers’ demands for standardization and increased academic achievement have led various stakeholder groups to call for more professional development (PD) in early childhood education and care (ECEC) settings. Federal initiatives and state agencies' quality improvement initiatives also position PD as a key component to improve access to quality programs for all. Yet, much of the PD consists of single-day workshops despite scholars continued calls for more critical approaches such as inquiry-based professional learning (IBPL). While research has emerged that examines the implementation of IBPL, little is known about how teachers and center leaders themselves make sense of such practices. This article therefore adds teachers’ and directors’ voices directly into the conversation as early childhood teacher educators continue to research and advocate for more critical and holistic approaches to PD. Findings from this research bring to light at least three main investments policy makers, teacher educators, classroom teachers and center leaders, and teachers-in-training can make to implement, sustain or improve IBPL in more ECEC spaces.
{"title":"How teachers and center leaders made sense of inquiry-based professional learning: a multiple case study","authors":"Joanna Englehardt, Christopher P. Brown","doi":"10.1080/10901027.2022.2125465","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2022.2125465","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Policymakers’ demands for standardization and increased academic achievement have led various stakeholder groups to call for more professional development (PD) in early childhood education and care (ECEC) settings. Federal initiatives and state agencies' quality improvement initiatives also position PD as a key component to improve access to quality programs for all. Yet, much of the PD consists of single-day workshops despite scholars continued calls for more critical approaches such as inquiry-based professional learning (IBPL). While research has emerged that examines the implementation of IBPL, little is known about how teachers and center leaders themselves make sense of such practices. This article therefore adds teachers’ and directors’ voices directly into the conversation as early childhood teacher educators continue to research and advocate for more critical and holistic approaches to PD. Findings from this research bring to light at least three main investments policy makers, teacher educators, classroom teachers and center leaders, and teachers-in-training can make to implement, sustain or improve IBPL in more ECEC spaces.","PeriodicalId":45981,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42873535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-20DOI: 10.1080/10901027.2022.2125461
L. Rucker, A. Zajicek, Brinck Kerr
ABSTRACT The qualifications that early childhood (EC) teachers attain vary across the 50 states. This variance is likely associated with the differences in state-level childcare licensing policies governing the qualification attainment of EC teachers. This research explores the relationship between childcare licensing policy and the qualifications that EC teachers attain. We examine secondary data from the National Survey of Early Care and Education merged with secondary policy data on childcare licensing policies for all 50 states. We use a series of linear and logistic regression models to understand how the policy stringency of childcare licensing predicts the attainment of educational degrees, EC certification, and professional development. We find more stringent policies predict teacher attainment of bachelor’s degrees in EC, certification, and professional development. Policy does not predict associate degree attainment in EC. Our finding that policy stringency aligns with qualification attainment demonstrates that policymakers can better target childcare licensing policies to promote qualification attainment among the EC workforce. This research can be used by 1) teacher education programs to illustrate how policies and regulatory standards influence the qualifications of the workforce that they prepare for careers in EC, and 2) policymakers to better craft and target childcare licensing policies that influence qualification attainment among their EC workforces.
{"title":"How policy can help prepare early childhood teachers: the alignment between state childcare licensing policy and teacher qualification attainment","authors":"L. Rucker, A. Zajicek, Brinck Kerr","doi":"10.1080/10901027.2022.2125461","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2022.2125461","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The qualifications that early childhood (EC) teachers attain vary across the 50 states. This variance is likely associated with the differences in state-level childcare licensing policies governing the qualification attainment of EC teachers. This research explores the relationship between childcare licensing policy and the qualifications that EC teachers attain. We examine secondary data from the National Survey of Early Care and Education merged with secondary policy data on childcare licensing policies for all 50 states. We use a series of linear and logistic regression models to understand how the policy stringency of childcare licensing predicts the attainment of educational degrees, EC certification, and professional development. We find more stringent policies predict teacher attainment of bachelor’s degrees in EC, certification, and professional development. Policy does not predict associate degree attainment in EC. Our finding that policy stringency aligns with qualification attainment demonstrates that policymakers can better target childcare licensing policies to promote qualification attainment among the EC workforce. This research can be used by 1) teacher education programs to illustrate how policies and regulatory standards influence the qualifications of the workforce that they prepare for careers in EC, and 2) policymakers to better craft and target childcare licensing policies that influence qualification attainment among their EC workforces.","PeriodicalId":45981,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"553 - 576"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48133826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-18DOI: 10.1080/10901027.2022.2125463
Melissa Sherfinski
ABSTRACT Writer’s workshop is a popular curriculum opportunity in most US schools. This case study of two Black boys engaging in a Kindergarten writer’s workshop richly contextualizes their writing identities and practices. A critical childhood studies framework was used to show how Black boys and their White teachers improvised writing-related relationships. The research questions for the study were: (1) How did Black boys use creativity and strength to push back against the semi-scripted curriculum in Kindergarten writer’s workshop? (2) What can teachers and teacher educators learn from their examples? In the findings Black boys strove to think, understand, and practice writing freely and to use their personal and cultural resources outside the constraints of teaching scripts. However, when teachers did not navigate the semi-scripted curriculum, all the children were robbed of their writing identities but Black boys were most deeply affected. Reflection questions and suggestions for teacher educators and professional developers are designed to support the use of improvisational practices and African diaspora literacy in early childhood and elementary school writing contexts.
{"title":"Relational aspects of writer’s workshop in kindergarten: learning from Black boys who used their creativity and strength to speak back to the scripted curriculum","authors":"Melissa Sherfinski","doi":"10.1080/10901027.2022.2125463","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2022.2125463","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Writer’s workshop is a popular curriculum opportunity in most US schools. This case study of two Black boys engaging in a Kindergarten writer’s workshop richly contextualizes their writing identities and practices. A critical childhood studies framework was used to show how Black boys and their White teachers improvised writing-related relationships. The research questions for the study were: (1) How did Black boys use creativity and strength to push back against the semi-scripted curriculum in Kindergarten writer’s workshop? (2) What can teachers and teacher educators learn from their examples? In the findings Black boys strove to think, understand, and practice writing freely and to use their personal and cultural resources outside the constraints of teaching scripts. However, when teachers did not navigate the semi-scripted curriculum, all the children were robbed of their writing identities but Black boys were most deeply affected. Reflection questions and suggestions for teacher educators and professional developers are designed to support the use of improvisational practices and African diaspora literacy in early childhood and elementary school writing contexts.","PeriodicalId":45981,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"577 - 597"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43481247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：