Pub Date : 2025-09-10DOI: 10.1007/s13280-025-02243-4
Sara Anamaghi, Massoud Behboudian, Mohammad Javad Emami-Skardi, Elisie Kåresdotter, Carla Sofia Santos Ferreira, Georgia Destouni, Lan Wang-Erlandsson, Anna Tengberg, Fabian Stenzel, Ingo Fetzer, Najmeh Mahjouri, Reza Kerachian, Zahra Kalantari
This study investigates how the seven core resilience principles are integrated into assessments of forest system resilience to natural or human-induced disturbances across engineering, ecological, and social-ecological resilience concepts. Following PRISMA guidelines, a literature search in the Web of Science database using the keywords "resilience", "forest" and "ecosystem services" yielded 1828 studies, of which 330 met the selection criteria. The most commonly used criterion was diversity, a sub-criterion of "diversity and redundancy", appearing in 50% of studies. The results indicate that social and governance-related principles, learning and experimentation (7%), participation (11%), and polycentric governance (9%) have not been frequently addressed. Although numerous studies have employed various principles for assessing forest resilience, none have considered all seven principles jointly. This highlights a significant research gap, emphasising the need to quantify these principles in forest systems. Understanding forest-community dynamics is essential for enhancing the long-term resilience and sustainability of both systems.
本研究探讨了如何将七个核心弹性原则整合到森林系统对自然或人为干扰的弹性评估中,包括工程、生态和社会生态弹性概念。按照PRISMA的指导方针,在Web of Science数据库中使用关键词“恢复力”、“森林”和“生态系统服务”进行文献检索,得到了1828项研究,其中330项符合选择标准。最常用的标准是多样性,这是“多样性和冗余”的子标准,出现在50%的研究中。结果表明,与社会和治理相关的原则、学习和实验(7%)、参与(11%)和多中心治理(9%)并没有经常得到解决。虽然许多研究采用了各种原则来评估森林恢复力,但没有一项研究联合考虑了所有七项原则。这突出了一个重大的研究差距,强调需要在森林系统中量化这些原则。了解森林群落动态对于增强这两个系统的长期复原力和可持续性至关重要。
{"title":"Research efforts and gaps in the assessment of forest system resilience: A scoping review.","authors":"Sara Anamaghi, Massoud Behboudian, Mohammad Javad Emami-Skardi, Elisie Kåresdotter, Carla Sofia Santos Ferreira, Georgia Destouni, Lan Wang-Erlandsson, Anna Tengberg, Fabian Stenzel, Ingo Fetzer, Najmeh Mahjouri, Reza Kerachian, Zahra Kalantari","doi":"10.1007/s13280-025-02243-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02243-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates how the seven core resilience principles are integrated into assessments of forest system resilience to natural or human-induced disturbances across engineering, ecological, and social-ecological resilience concepts. Following PRISMA guidelines, a literature search in the Web of Science database using the keywords \"resilience\", \"forest\" and \"ecosystem services\" yielded 1828 studies, of which 330 met the selection criteria. The most commonly used criterion was diversity, a sub-criterion of \"diversity and redundancy\", appearing in 50% of studies. The results indicate that social and governance-related principles, learning and experimentation (7%), participation (11%), and polycentric governance (9%) have not been frequently addressed. Although numerous studies have employed various principles for assessing forest resilience, none have considered all seven principles jointly. This highlights a significant research gap, emphasising the need to quantify these principles in forest systems. Understanding forest-community dynamics is essential for enhancing the long-term resilience and sustainability of both systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":461,"journal":{"name":"Ambio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145032603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-03DOI: 10.1007/s13280-025-02234-5
Pedro Medrado Krainovic, João Paulo Romanelli, Angélica Faria de Resende, Laura Helena Porcari Simões, Ana Flávia Boeni, Lukas Rodrigues Souza, Cássio Augusto Patrocinio Toledo, Vinicius Castro Souza, Joannès Guillemot, Rens Brouwer, Frans Bongers, Paulo Guilherme Molin, Rafael Barreiro Chaves, Klécia Gili Massi, Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues, Sergio de-Miguel, Pedro Henrique Santin Brancalion
Forest restoration faces financial constraints due to land opportunity costs and delayed returns from ecosystem services and timber production. A socially fair bioeconomy of non-timber products from native species is a promising pathway to overcome these challenges. We investigated the bioeconomic potential of native species in the reforested lands of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. A forest inventory across 46 plots (41 400 m2) in regenerating forests revealed 5181 individuals and 329 species. A review of 603 articles showed 167 species (59%) with bioeconomic potential. Medicinal (58%), cosmetic (12%), and food (5%) uses predominated. Leaves were the most used plant part. Of 2520 patents, we found 78 species patented in 61 countries (8% in Brazil). Only 13% of studies reached the final product stages. The palms (Syagrus romanzoffiana and Euterpe edulis) and the conifer (Araucaria angustifolia) highlight how native species synergistically improve the restoration’s supply of resources to the biotech industry.