Patrick L Day, Denise Rokke, Laura Schneider, Jillian Abbott, Brenda Holmen, Patrick Johnson, Mikolaj A Wieczorek, Katie L Kunze, Rickey E Carter, Joshua Bornhorst, Paul J Jannetto
Background: We sought to evaluate key performance indicators related to an internally developed and deployed artificial intelligence (AI)-augmented kidney stone composition test system for potential improvements in test quality, efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and staff satisfaction.
Methods: We compared quality, efficiency, staff satisfaction, and financial data from the 6 months after the AI-augmented laboratory test system was deployed (test period) with data from the same 6-month period in the previous year (control period) to determine if AI-augmentation improved key performance indicators of this laboratory test.
Results: In the 6 months following the deployment (test period) of the AI-augmented kidney stone composition test system, 44 830 kidney stones were analyzed. Of these, 92% of kidney stones were eligible for AI-assisted interpretation. Out of these AI-eligible stones, 45% were able to be auto-released by the AI-augmented test system without human secondary review. Furthermore, the new AI-augmented kidney stone test system resulted in an apparent 40% reduction in incorrect laboratory results. Additionally, the new AI-augmented test system improved laboratory efficiency by 20%, improved staff satisfaction, and reduced the average analysis cost per kidney stone by $0.23.
Conclusions: The AI-augmented test system improved test quality, efficiency, cost-effectiveness and staff satisfaction related to this kidney stone composition test.
{"title":"AI-Augmented Kidney Stone Composition Analysis with Auto-Release Improves Quality, Efficiency, Cost-Effectiveness, and Staff Satisfaction.","authors":"Patrick L Day, Denise Rokke, Laura Schneider, Jillian Abbott, Brenda Holmen, Patrick Johnson, Mikolaj A Wieczorek, Katie L Kunze, Rickey E Carter, Joshua Bornhorst, Paul J Jannetto","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae146","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We sought to evaluate key performance indicators related to an internally developed and deployed artificial intelligence (AI)-augmented kidney stone composition test system for potential improvements in test quality, efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and staff satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared quality, efficiency, staff satisfaction, and financial data from the 6 months after the AI-augmented laboratory test system was deployed (test period) with data from the same 6-month period in the previous year (control period) to determine if AI-augmentation improved key performance indicators of this laboratory test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 6 months following the deployment (test period) of the AI-augmented kidney stone composition test system, 44 830 kidney stones were analyzed. Of these, 92% of kidney stones were eligible for AI-assisted interpretation. Out of these AI-eligible stones, 45% were able to be auto-released by the AI-augmented test system without human secondary review. Furthermore, the new AI-augmented kidney stone test system resulted in an apparent 40% reduction in incorrect laboratory results. Additionally, the new AI-augmented test system improved laboratory efficiency by 20%, improved staff satisfaction, and reduced the average analysis cost per kidney stone by $0.23.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AI-augmented test system improved test quality, efficiency, cost-effectiveness and staff satisfaction related to this kidney stone composition test.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142865784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jean-Paul Salameh, David Moher, Trevor A McGrath, Robert A Frank, Anahita Dehmoobad Sharifabadi, Nabil Islam, Eric Lam, Robert Adamo, Haben Dawit, Mohammed Kashif Al-Ghita, Brooke Levis, Brett D Thombs, Patrick M Bossuyt, Matthew D F McInnes
Background: We evaluated reporting of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) systematic reviews using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-DTA and PRISMA-DTA for abstracts.
Methods: We searched MEDLINE for recent DTA systematic reviews (September 2023-Mar 2024) to achieve a sample size of 100. Analyses evaluated adherence to PRISMA-DTA (and abstracts), on a per-item basis. Association of reporting with journal, country, impact factor (IF), index-test type, subspecialty area, use of supplemental material, PRISMA citation, word count, and PRISMA adoption was evaluated. Comparison to the baseline evaluation from 2019 was done. Protocol: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/P25TE.
Results: Overall adherence (n = 100) was 78% (20.3/26.0 items, SD = 2.0) for PRISMA-DTA and 52% (5.7/11.0 items, SD = 1.6) for abstracts. Infrequently reported items (<33% of studies): eligibility criteria, definitions for data extraction, synthesis of results, and characteristics of the included studies. Infrequently reported items in abstracts were characteristics of the included studies, strengths and limitations, and funding. Reporting completeness for full text was minimally higher in studies in higher IF journals [20.7 vs 19.8 items; 95% confidence interval (95%CI) (0.09; 1.77)], as well as studies that cited PRISMA [21.1 vs 20.1 items; 95%CI (0.04; 1.95)], or used supplemental material (20.7 vs 19.2 items; 95%CI (0.63; 2.35)]. Variability in reporting was not associated with author country, journal, abstract word count limitations, PRISMA adoption, structured abstracts, study design, subspecialty, open-access status, or index test. No association with word counts was observed among full text or abstracts. Compared to the baseline evaluation, reporting was improved for full texts [71% to 78%; 95%CI (1.18; 2.26)] but not for abstracts [50% to 52%; 95%CI (-0.20; 0.60)].
Conclusions: Compared to the baseline evaluation published in 2019, we observed modest improved adherence to PRISMA-DTA and no improvement in PRISMA-DTA for abstracts reporting.
{"title":"Assessing Adherence to the PRISMA-DTA Guideline in Diagnostic Test Accuracy Systematic Reviews: A Five-Year Follow-up Analysis.","authors":"Jean-Paul Salameh, David Moher, Trevor A McGrath, Robert A Frank, Anahita Dehmoobad Sharifabadi, Nabil Islam, Eric Lam, Robert Adamo, Haben Dawit, Mohammed Kashif Al-Ghita, Brooke Levis, Brett D Thombs, Patrick M Bossuyt, Matthew D F McInnes","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae117","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated reporting of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) systematic reviews using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-DTA and PRISMA-DTA for abstracts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE for recent DTA systematic reviews (September 2023-Mar 2024) to achieve a sample size of 100. Analyses evaluated adherence to PRISMA-DTA (and abstracts), on a per-item basis. Association of reporting with journal, country, impact factor (IF), index-test type, subspecialty area, use of supplemental material, PRISMA citation, word count, and PRISMA adoption was evaluated. Comparison to the baseline evaluation from 2019 was done. Protocol: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/P25TE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall adherence (n = 100) was 78% (20.3/26.0 items, SD = 2.0) for PRISMA-DTA and 52% (5.7/11.0 items, SD = 1.6) for abstracts. Infrequently reported items (<33% of studies): eligibility criteria, definitions for data extraction, synthesis of results, and characteristics of the included studies. Infrequently reported items in abstracts were characteristics of the included studies, strengths and limitations, and funding. Reporting completeness for full text was minimally higher in studies in higher IF journals [20.7 vs 19.8 items; 95% confidence interval (95%CI) (0.09; 1.77)], as well as studies that cited PRISMA [21.1 vs 20.1 items; 95%CI (0.04; 1.95)], or used supplemental material (20.7 vs 19.2 items; 95%CI (0.63; 2.35)]. Variability in reporting was not associated with author country, journal, abstract word count limitations, PRISMA adoption, structured abstracts, study design, subspecialty, open-access status, or index test. No association with word counts was observed among full text or abstracts. Compared to the baseline evaluation, reporting was improved for full texts [71% to 78%; 95%CI (1.18; 2.26)] but not for abstracts [50% to 52%; 95%CI (-0.20; 0.60)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to the baseline evaluation published in 2019, we observed modest improved adherence to PRISMA-DTA and no improvement in PRISMA-DTA for abstracts reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142856195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
David Barnidge, Dhananjay Sakrikar, Tadeusz Kubicki, Benjamin A Derman, Andrzej J Jakubowiak, Gabriella Lakos
Background: Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (t-mAbs) may interfere with electrophoresis-based methods used to monitor multiple myeloma (MM), which can create inaccurate results. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry is an alternative to gels distinguishing between endogenous M-proteins and t-mAbs based on molecular mass.
Methods: Serum samples (n = 109) from 34 MM patients receiving Dara-KRd were collected 14 or 28 days postdaratumumab administration. Samples were analyzed using the EXENT® Analyzer that combines automated immunopurification and MALDI-TOF MS for the isotyping and quantification of monoclonal immunoglobulins.
Results: Daratumumab was identified in 103 out of 109 samples (94.5%). In all IgGλ (n = 8), IgAκ (n = 8), and IgAλ (n = 2) patients, the M-protein and daratumumab were detected. Of the IgGκ patients (n = 18), 5 patients had a total of 6 samples where the M-protein was detected but daratumumab was not. There was no difference in the detection rate of daratumumab between samples taken 14 and 28 days postadministration with the median daratumumab concentration being 0.95 and 0.54 g/L, respectively. A precision study was also performed on 25 replicates containing 1 g/L daratumumab in serum where a coefficient of variation of 4.2% was observed as determined by the EXENT Analyzer.
Conclusions: The Immunoglobulin Isotypes (GAM: IgG, IgA, and IgM) for the EXENT Analyzer detected and distinguished a daratumumab kappa light chain peak from an M-protein light chain peak in MM patient serum when resolved by the mass spectrometer.
{"title":"Distinguishing Daratumumab from Endogenous Monoclonal Proteins in Serum from Multiple Myeloma Patients Using an Automated Mass Spectrometry System.","authors":"David Barnidge, Dhananjay Sakrikar, Tadeusz Kubicki, Benjamin A Derman, Andrzej J Jakubowiak, Gabriella Lakos","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae142","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae142","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (t-mAbs) may interfere with electrophoresis-based methods used to monitor multiple myeloma (MM), which can create inaccurate results. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry is an alternative to gels distinguishing between endogenous M-proteins and t-mAbs based on molecular mass.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Serum samples (n = 109) from 34 MM patients receiving Dara-KRd were collected 14 or 28 days postdaratumumab administration. Samples were analyzed using the EXENT® Analyzer that combines automated immunopurification and MALDI-TOF MS for the isotyping and quantification of monoclonal immunoglobulins.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Daratumumab was identified in 103 out of 109 samples (94.5%). In all IgGλ (n = 8), IgAκ (n = 8), and IgAλ (n = 2) patients, the M-protein and daratumumab were detected. Of the IgGκ patients (n = 18), 5 patients had a total of 6 samples where the M-protein was detected but daratumumab was not. There was no difference in the detection rate of daratumumab between samples taken 14 and 28 days postadministration with the median daratumumab concentration being 0.95 and 0.54 g/L, respectively. A precision study was also performed on 25 replicates containing 1 g/L daratumumab in serum where a coefficient of variation of 4.2% was observed as determined by the EXENT Analyzer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Immunoglobulin Isotypes (GAM: IgG, IgA, and IgM) for the EXENT Analyzer detected and distinguished a daratumumab kappa light chain peak from an M-protein light chain peak in MM patient serum when resolved by the mass spectrometer.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142856197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Leo Lin, Michael Filtz, Jeffrey Wilson, Roscoe Errigo, Lauren M Zuromski, Anh Nguyen Sorenson, Brittany A Young
Background: Rasburicase retains activity at room temperature (RT), so specimens collected for uric acid-level monitoring require cooling protocols. Our objective was to determine if we could ease these preanalytical requirements to improve compliance while maintaining accuracy.
Methods: Fifty pairs of specimens were transported and stored either on ice or at RT. All were tested at 3 time points postcollection: immediately upon arrival to the laboratory (approximately 45 min), 90, and 135 min.
Results: Uric acid concentrations are not clinically significantly different in RT or iced specimens, as long as specimens are tested within approximately 45 min postcollection. There was a negative bias in uric acid levels in a subset of specimens if they were held at RT and tested at 90 min (-9.1%) and 135 min (-17.5%). Specimens tested within 2 rasburicase half-lives postinfusion have an additional 24% decrease in uric acid levels if kept at RT for 90 min. Specimens from patients given a 6 mg dose had an 18% decrease in uric acid concentration compared to a 3 mg dose.
Conclusions: Laboratories that can test uric acid levels rapidly after specimen collection may be able to validate alternative preanalytical methods to transporting and testing on ice.
{"title":"Comparing Refrigeration to Immediate Room Temperature Testing for Uric Acid Monitoring in Rasburicase-Treated Patients.","authors":"Leo Lin, Michael Filtz, Jeffrey Wilson, Roscoe Errigo, Lauren M Zuromski, Anh Nguyen Sorenson, Brittany A Young","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae139","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rasburicase retains activity at room temperature (RT), so specimens collected for uric acid-level monitoring require cooling protocols. Our objective was to determine if we could ease these preanalytical requirements to improve compliance while maintaining accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty pairs of specimens were transported and stored either on ice or at RT. All were tested at 3 time points postcollection: immediately upon arrival to the laboratory (approximately 45 min), 90, and 135 min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Uric acid concentrations are not clinically significantly different in RT or iced specimens, as long as specimens are tested within approximately 45 min postcollection. There was a negative bias in uric acid levels in a subset of specimens if they were held at RT and tested at 90 min (-9.1%) and 135 min (-17.5%). Specimens tested within 2 rasburicase half-lives postinfusion have an additional 24% decrease in uric acid levels if kept at RT for 90 min. Specimens from patients given a 6 mg dose had an 18% decrease in uric acid concentration compared to a 3 mg dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laboratories that can test uric acid levels rapidly after specimen collection may be able to validate alternative preanalytical methods to transporting and testing on ice.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142848008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bernice A Agana, Brian Overton, Katherine Florendo, Claire E Knezevic
Background: Hemolysis is a major pre-analytical concern for many laboratory analytes; however, instruments utilized for whole blood chemistries and blood gas measurements lack the ability to detect and measure the degree of hemolysis. This study evaluated the effect of hemolysis on 13 routine whole blood and blood gas analytes and compared visual assessments of hemolysis to measured hemolysis (H-index).
Methods: Remnant whole blood samples (n = 85) were split into 2 portions and aspirated through a syringe one or more times. To induce hemolysis, a needle was affixed to the end of the syringe to provide shear stress, and a mock procedure without syringe was used as a control. Samples were analyzed on a Radiometer ABL800 series instrument, centrifuged, and the H-index of the plasma portion was measured. Two medical technologists recorded a visual categorization of the specimens as slightly, moderately, or severely hemolyzed.
Results: Hemolysis had a modest effect on metabolites and most cooximetry components, with percent bias within ±5% at all levels of hemolysis. Methemoglobin exhibited a larger overall negative bias, up to 13.3%. The absolute pH bias was fairly consistent (within 0.1 pH units) across all levels of hemolysis. As expected, potassium displayed a significant positive bias with increasing hemolysis. Sodium and ionized calcium displayed overall linear trends with a significant negative bias.
Conclusions: Hemolysis can falsely increase or decrease certain blood gas analytes and lead to misinterpretation of results. Therefore, hemolysis detection capabilities are crucial for mitigating this effect and ensuring accurate results for patient care.
{"title":"Effect of Hemolysis on Routine Blood Gas and Whole Blood Analytes.","authors":"Bernice A Agana, Brian Overton, Katherine Florendo, Claire E Knezevic","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae140","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae140","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemolysis is a major pre-analytical concern for many laboratory analytes; however, instruments utilized for whole blood chemistries and blood gas measurements lack the ability to detect and measure the degree of hemolysis. This study evaluated the effect of hemolysis on 13 routine whole blood and blood gas analytes and compared visual assessments of hemolysis to measured hemolysis (H-index).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Remnant whole blood samples (n = 85) were split into 2 portions and aspirated through a syringe one or more times. To induce hemolysis, a needle was affixed to the end of the syringe to provide shear stress, and a mock procedure without syringe was used as a control. Samples were analyzed on a Radiometer ABL800 series instrument, centrifuged, and the H-index of the plasma portion was measured. Two medical technologists recorded a visual categorization of the specimens as slightly, moderately, or severely hemolyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hemolysis had a modest effect on metabolites and most cooximetry components, with percent bias within ±5% at all levels of hemolysis. Methemoglobin exhibited a larger overall negative bias, up to 13.3%. The absolute pH bias was fairly consistent (within 0.1 pH units) across all levels of hemolysis. As expected, potassium displayed a significant positive bias with increasing hemolysis. Sodium and ionized calcium displayed overall linear trends with a significant negative bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hemolysis can falsely increase or decrease certain blood gas analytes and lead to misinterpretation of results. Therefore, hemolysis detection capabilities are crucial for mitigating this effect and ensuring accurate results for patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142839764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Elevated human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) of unknown etiology is often a diagnostic dilemma. Determination of its source is vital in order to provide proper medical treatment and prevent possible unneeded therapeutic interventions. The differential diagnosis for elevated hCG is broad and includes pregnancy, chronic kidney disease, heterophile antibody, macro-hCG, exogenous hCG administration, pituitary secretion, tumor-associated secretion, etc. One entity that is emerging in the published literature as a cause of elevated hCG is familial hCG syndrome. This syndrome is characterized by persistently elevated concentrations from a yet to be determined source in individuals of the same family. In this special report, we review a recently published case of elevated hCG in a 56-year-old male proposed to be due to familial hCG syndrome. We discuss why we feel the presented case is not consistent with familial hCG syndrome and explore other possible explanations for the patient's elevated hCG concentrations.
{"title":"A Second Opinion: Expert Commentary on \"Persistent Mild Increase of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin in a Male Patient with Testicular Pain\".","authors":"Callie Torres, Ana Villanueva, Ann M Gronowski","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae143","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Elevated human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) of unknown etiology is often a diagnostic dilemma. Determination of its source is vital in order to provide proper medical treatment and prevent possible unneeded therapeutic interventions. The differential diagnosis for elevated hCG is broad and includes pregnancy, chronic kidney disease, heterophile antibody, macro-hCG, exogenous hCG administration, pituitary secretion, tumor-associated secretion, etc. One entity that is emerging in the published literature as a cause of elevated hCG is familial hCG syndrome. This syndrome is characterized by persistently elevated concentrations from a yet to be determined source in individuals of the same family. In this special report, we review a recently published case of elevated hCG in a 56-year-old male proposed to be due to familial hCG syndrome. We discuss why we feel the presented case is not consistent with familial hCG syndrome and explore other possible explanations for the patient's elevated hCG concentrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142839736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Assessing the Clinical Significance of the MCM6 c.-14011C/T Polymorphism in Lactose Intolerance: Insights from a Case Series.","authors":"Stine B Bruun, Jonna S Madsen, Pernille M Bøttger","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae138","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae138","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142824681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nichole Korpi-Steiner, Steven W Cotten, Randie R Little, Deepa Kirk
{"title":"Discordant Point-of-Care and Laboratory Hemoglobin A1c Concentrations in Ambulatory Settings.","authors":"Nichole Korpi-Steiner, Steven W Cotten, Randie R Little, Deepa Kirk","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae153","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae153","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142824687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Most studies found that apolipoprotein B (apo B)-100 is a superior marker for coronary risk to non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (C). Usually, studies use multivariant analysis with single-point odds/risk ratios. In multivariant analysis, when variables are highly correlated they are difficult to interpret. Effects cannot be well discriminated.
Methods: Brief review and examination of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves at decision levels so that discrimination can be well compared. Since apo B has additional expense, clinical value should be compared in an appropriate format. Apo B and cholesterols were measured in 382 angiographically defined patients.
Results: Non-HDLC and apo B were stronger markers than low-density lipoprotein (LDL)C, when examined by logistic regression, but as a result of strong collinearity, non-HDLC appeared weaker than LDLC in the presence of apo B, based on P values. This was true when analyzed with and without nonlipid risk factors. On ROC analysis, apo B and non-HDLC showed stronger C statistics than LDLC and total C. When analyzed alone apo B showed about 6.1% greater sensitivity than non-HDLC. After adjustment for nonlipid risk factors, the C statistics for apo B and non-HDLC were 0.74 and 0.73, and there was little difference in diagnostic specificity.
Conclusions: Risk is calculated from an algorithm that includes nonlipid risk factors similar to those examined here along with cholesterols. When assessed by the 10-year screening algorithm, these data support the view that non-HDLC would be less expensive than apo B with similar clinical efficacy.
背景:大多数研究发现,载脂蛋白 B(载脂蛋白 B)-100 是一种优于非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(C)的冠心病风险标志物。研究通常使用多变量分析和单点几率/风险比。在多变量分析中,当变量高度相关时,很难对其进行解释。方法:方法:通过接收器操作者特征曲线(ROC)对诊断灵敏度和特异性进行简要回顾和检查,以便对判定水平进行比较。由于载脂蛋白 B 有额外的费用,因此应以适当的形式比较其临床价值。对 382 名血管造影确定的患者进行了载脂蛋白 B 和胆固醇的测量:通过逻辑回归分析,非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和载脂蛋白 B 是比低密度脂蛋白(LDL)C 更强的标志物,但由于强烈的共线性,根据 P 值,非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇在有载脂蛋白 B 的情况下似乎比低密度脂蛋白胆固醇更弱。在分析有无非血脂风险因素时,情况也是如此。在 ROC 分析中,载脂蛋白 B 和非 HDLC 比 LDLC 和总 C 显示出更强的 C 统计量。对非脂质风险因素进行调整后,载脂蛋白 B 和非 HDLC 的 C 统计量分别为 0.74 和 0.73,诊断特异性差别不大:结论:风险是通过一种算法计算出来的,该算法包括与本文研究结果类似的非血脂风险因素和胆固醇。当采用 10 年筛查算法进行评估时,这些数据支持这样的观点,即非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比载脂蛋白 B 成本低,临床疗效相似。
{"title":"Non-HDL Cholesterol May Be Preferred over Apolipoprotein B-100 for Risk Assessment when Evaluated by Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve Analysis.","authors":"Stanley S Levinson","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae125","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae125","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most studies found that apolipoprotein B (apo B)-100 is a superior marker for coronary risk to non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (C). Usually, studies use multivariant analysis with single-point odds/risk ratios. In multivariant analysis, when variables are highly correlated they are difficult to interpret. Effects cannot be well discriminated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Brief review and examination of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves at decision levels so that discrimination can be well compared. Since apo B has additional expense, clinical value should be compared in an appropriate format. Apo B and cholesterols were measured in 382 angiographically defined patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Non-HDLC and apo B were stronger markers than low-density lipoprotein (LDL)C, when examined by logistic regression, but as a result of strong collinearity, non-HDLC appeared weaker than LDLC in the presence of apo B, based on P values. This was true when analyzed with and without nonlipid risk factors. On ROC analysis, apo B and non-HDLC showed stronger C statistics than LDLC and total C. When analyzed alone apo B showed about 6.1% greater sensitivity than non-HDLC. After adjustment for nonlipid risk factors, the C statistics for apo B and non-HDLC were 0.74 and 0.73, and there was little difference in diagnostic specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Risk is calculated from an algorithm that includes nonlipid risk factors similar to those examined here along with cholesterols. When assessed by the 10-year screening algorithm, these data support the view that non-HDLC would be less expensive than apo B with similar clinical efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142822681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Godwin Ogbonna, Jodiann R Atienza, David W Singleton, Andrea Ott-Vasconi, Stacey A Alvey
Background: Procalcitonin (PCT) measurement is useful for guiding antibiotic therapy and risk assessment in lower respiratory infections and/or sepsis. This study evaluated clinical and analytical performance of the Vitros® Immunodiagnostic Products B·R·A·H·M·S PCT assay (Vitros PCT).
Methods: Precision, limits of blank (LoB), detection (LoD), and quantitation (LoQ) were determined for Vitros PCT, along with method comparison and clinical concordance with the B·R·A·H·M·S PCT™-sensitive KRYPTOR™ assay (KRYPTOR PCT). All-cause 28-day mortality was evaluated according to the change in PCT values (ΔPCT) from day 0 through day 4 in samples from 598 intensive care unit patients with sepsis.
Results: Comparison of Vitros PCT and KRYPTOR PCT results yielded a Deming regression slope of 1.057, intercept of -0.010, and correlation coefficient (r) of 0.994. Precision analysis demonstrated within-laboratory coefficients of variation for Vitros PCT ranging from 3.1% to 6.4%. The LoD and observed LoQ were determined as 0.007 and 0.013 ng/mL, respectively. Overall agreement between assay methods was 98.5%, 98.0%, 97.4%, and 97.8%, at PCT clinical decision cutoffs of 0.100, 0.250, 0.500, and 2.00 ng/mL, respectively, with Cohen's Kappa coefficients (κ) > 0.91. ΔPCT values ≤80% vs >80% were associated with increased 28-day-all-cause mortality (P = 0.006).
Conclusions: Vitros PCT compares well with KRYPTOR PCT, showing excellent agreement at relevant clinical decision cutoffs that have been used for antibiotic decision-making and assessment of risk for sepsis progression. ΔPCT values determined with Vitros PCT were useful for evaluation of 28-day mortality risk in patients with severe sepsis.
{"title":"Clinical and Analytical Performance Evaluation of an Automated Procalcitonin Assay.","authors":"Godwin Ogbonna, Jodiann R Atienza, David W Singleton, Andrea Ott-Vasconi, Stacey A Alvey","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae114","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Procalcitonin (PCT) measurement is useful for guiding antibiotic therapy and risk assessment in lower respiratory infections and/or sepsis. This study evaluated clinical and analytical performance of the Vitros® Immunodiagnostic Products B·R·A·H·M·S PCT assay (Vitros PCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Precision, limits of blank (LoB), detection (LoD), and quantitation (LoQ) were determined for Vitros PCT, along with method comparison and clinical concordance with the B·R·A·H·M·S PCT™-sensitive KRYPTOR™ assay (KRYPTOR PCT). All-cause 28-day mortality was evaluated according to the change in PCT values (ΔPCT) from day 0 through day 4 in samples from 598 intensive care unit patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison of Vitros PCT and KRYPTOR PCT results yielded a Deming regression slope of 1.057, intercept of -0.010, and correlation coefficient (r) of 0.994. Precision analysis demonstrated within-laboratory coefficients of variation for Vitros PCT ranging from 3.1% to 6.4%. The LoD and observed LoQ were determined as 0.007 and 0.013 ng/mL, respectively. Overall agreement between assay methods was 98.5%, 98.0%, 97.4%, and 97.8%, at PCT clinical decision cutoffs of 0.100, 0.250, 0.500, and 2.00 ng/mL, respectively, with Cohen's Kappa coefficients (κ) > 0.91. ΔPCT values ≤80% vs >80% were associated with increased 28-day-all-cause mortality (P = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vitros PCT compares well with KRYPTOR PCT, showing excellent agreement at relevant clinical decision cutoffs that have been used for antibiotic decision-making and assessment of risk for sepsis progression. ΔPCT values determined with Vitros PCT were useful for evaluation of 28-day mortality risk in patients with severe sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142814540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}