Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine最新文献

Background: Activating mutations in the phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) gene have been detected often in solid tumors. Targeted therapy for mutant PIK3CA is now available in the clinic, making molecular diagnostics pivotal. Our aim was to design a multiplex digital PCR (dPCR) assay to evaluate the 4 most common PIK3CA hotspot mutations simultaneously to characterize and quantify these in liquid biopsies.

Methods: A multiplex assay was developed to detect exon 9 p.E542K and p.E545K mutations, and exon 20 p.H1047L and p.H1047R mutations using the Stilla 3-color dPCR Naica system. The assay was evaluated on stock and pre-amplified DNA from cell lines with the above mutations as single and pooled samples, and on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from healthy blood donors (HBDs) and breast cancer patients, to determine detection thresholds and diagnostic accuracy.

Results: The assay distinguished all 4 PIK3CA mutations in (cf)DNA, and also when dual mutations were present. Detection thresholds of stock and pre-amplified cfDNA samples were 0.11 and 0.40 copies/uL (cp/uL) for mutant copies concentration, and 0.003% and 0.68% for variant allele frequencies (VAFs), respectively. The assay confirmed the PIK3CA (mutation) status as defined by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 82 out of 96 patients that were mutant for PIK3CA, and in 11 out of 12 patients with wild-type PIK3CA.

Conclusions: Our designed multiplex dPCR assay detected PIK3CA mutations with high accuracy in stock and pre-amplified cfDNA. Furthermore, it is affordable and demands less cfDNA input when compared to available uniplex dPCR assays and NGS analyses.

Background: Historically, von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity assays utilized ristocetin despite limitations including poor limits of detection and high imprecision. Newer VWF activity assays such as the INNOVANCE® VWF Ac assay, however, do not rely on ristocetin to measure platelet-dependent VWF function. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of the Siemens Healthineers INNOVANCE VWF Ac Assay on the Siemens BCS® XP and the Sysmex® CS-2500 systems in a large reference laboratory setting.

Methods: Performance indicators for the INNOVANCE VWF Ac assay were the limit of quantitation (LoQ), precision, and method comparison. Method comparison studies were performed using remnant plasma patient samples from routine coagulation tests and analyzed using both the INNOVANCE VWF Ac assay and the Siemens Healthineers ristocetin-dependent BC von Willebrand Reagent.

Results: Evaluation of the INNOVANCE VWF Ac assay on the BCS® XP and CS-2500 systems demonstrated good precision and a lower LoQ compared to the BC von Willebrand Reagent. Method comparisons support the use of the INNOVANCE VWF Ac assay on the BCS® XP and CS-2500 systems to measure platelet-dependent VWF function. The INNOVANCE VWF Ac assay was able to further assist in von Willebrand disease classification in 6/7 (86%) samples when the result was below the LoQ for the BC von Willebrand Reagent (ristocetin cofactor activity).

Conclusions: These data are consistent with the 2021 American Society of Hematology/International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis/National Hemophilia Foundation/World Federation of Hemophilia von Willebrand disease guidelines that suggest using newer assays such as the INNOVANCE VWF Ac assay in place of ristocetin cofactor activity assays.

Background: Given the opioid epidemic, fentanyl screening in urine has become increasingly important. Immunoassays remain the most common screening methodology due to the high throughput and ease of integration into automated chemistry systems. The fentanyl ARK II from Ark Diagnostics is a widely used immunoassay, while a novel fentanyl assay called FEN2 by Lin-Zhi has become available on the Roche platform. Here, we evaluate and compare their performance.

Methods: Four hundred and thirty-four urine samples were analyzed for fentanyl across the Lin-Zhi FEN2 and ARK II assays on the Cobas c502 platform. Samples were analyzed immediately upon request for drug of abuse screening or frozen for subsequent analysis. For confirmation testing, a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a limit of detection of 1 ng/mL for fentanyl/norfentanyl was used. Any sample with either fentanyl or norfentanyl above the LC-MS/MS cutoff was deemed positive.

Results: The ARK II had 11 false negatives and 7 false positives, while the Lin-Zhi FEN2 had 12 false negatives and 2 false positives. This resulted in ARK II having a sensitivity and specificity of 90.4% and 97.8% respectively, while Lin-Zhi FEN2 had a sensitivity and specificity of 89.5% and 99.4%.

Conclusions: Both the ARK II and Lin-Zhi FEN2 immunoassays detected fentanyl well. Overall, the Lin-Zhi assay had slightly better specificity than ARK II, in our data set. While some discrepant results were observed between the 2 immunoassay systems, most occurred near the immunoassay detection cutoffs.

Background: Fentanyl, a synthetic opioid, has caused many recent overdose deaths. Diagnosis of fentanyl abuse is not served by traditional opiate assays due to differences in chemical structure between synthetics and natural opioids. To our knowledge, this is the first study that uses liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as the reference method to evaluate and compare the ARK Fentanyl II Assay (ARK II) and the Fentanyl II Enzyme Immunoassay by Roche (FEN2). The ARK II is designed to detect fentanyl in urine samples, whereas the FEN2 is designed to detect norfentanyl, which is the major metabolite.

Methods: Two hundred patient urine samples including 100 positive and 100 negative samples according to an in-house LC-MS/MS assay were selected for the study. These samples were tested using the ARK II and the FEN2 to determine their performances relative to LC-MS/MS results.

Results: The FEN2 showed a positive and negative predictive value of 100% and 97% and a concordance with LC-MS/MS of 98.5% (kappa 0.97). The ARK II showed a positive and negative predictive value of 100% and 95% and a concordance with LC-MS/MS of 97.5% (kappa 0.95). Additionally, the FEN2 accurately identified 9 positive samples with a range of fentanyl concentrations from 0 to 18 ng/mL for which norfentanyl levels were less than the cutoff of 5 ng/mL, indicating potentially greater sensitivity than otherwise stated.

Conclusions: The FEN2 and the ARK II were evaluated to be similar in terms of positive and negative predictive value during the analysis of 200 patient samples, as well as equally concordant with the LC-MS/MS reference, despite differences in design.

Background: The accurate measurement of blood lipids and lipoproteins is crucial for the clinical management of atherosclerotic disease risk. Despite progress in standardization, there are still significant variations in pre-analytical requirements, methods, nomenclature, and reporting work flows.

Content: The guidance document aims to improve standardization of clinical lipid testing work flows. It provides recommendations for the components of the lipid panel, fasting requirements, reporting of results, and specific recommendations for non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], apolipoprotein B (apo B), point-of-care lipid testing, and LDL subfraction testing.

Summary: Lipid panels should always report non-HDL-C and LDL-C calculations if possible. Fasting is not routinely required except in specific cases. Modern equations should be utilized for LDL-C calculation. These equations allow for LDL-C reporting at elevated concentrations of triglycerides and obviate the need for direct measured LDL-C in most cases.

Background: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious adverse effect of heparin treatment caused by platelet-activating anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies. Accurate diagnosis of HIT is essential but remains challenging. The aim of our study was to explore the performance of our optimized diagnostic laboratory algorithm, based on Chemiluminescence (CliA) and ELISA immunoassays, on suspected HIT patients. The study compared the prevalence of HIT diagnosis in A.O. Mauriziano with the literature.

Methods: 163 consecutive patients were investigated for suspected HIT with CliA HemosIL Acustar HIT-IgG, Werfen. HIT was ruled out in all patients with CliA <0.13 U/mL. All patients with CliA >0.13 U/mL were further investigated with Zymutest-HIA anti-PF4 IgG ELISA immunoassay. In these patients, HIT was ruled out on the combination of CliA between 0.13 and 1.0 U/mL followed by ELISA assay <0.300 OD. HIT was ruled in patients whose plasma tested positive or doubtful with CliA and positive with ELISA immunoassay and confirmed positive with a platelet aggregation test (PAT). Suspicion of HIT was revealed with clinical 4Ts score or recent suggestive anamnestic history.

Results: Our diagnostic algorithm ruled out HIT diagnosis in 144/163 patients (88%) and predicted a positive PAT in 5/19 (26%) of CliA positive (4/5) or ELISA positive and CliA doubtful (1/5) patients.

Conclusions: Our prevalence was 3.1%, comparable with the literature. The approach combining 2 quantitative immunoassays' (CliA and ELISA) results and 4Ts score probability was able to rule out the diagnosis within 1 h in 66% of patients with suspected HIT and within 24 h in 88% of patients. In the remaining 12% of cases, management decisions have to be based on individualized judgment while awaiting functional confirming results (48-72 h).