Pub Date : 2021-04-01DOI: 10.1080/15504263.2021.1904162
MacKenzie R Peltier, Mehmet Sofuoglu, Ismene L Petrakis, Elina Stefanovics, Robert A Rosenheck
Objective: Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a significant problem among US veterans with increasing rates of OUD and overdose, and thus has substantial importance for service delivery within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Among individuals with OUD, several sex- specific differences have begun to emerge regarding co-occurring medical, psychiatric and pain-related diagnoses. The rates of such multimorbidities are likely to vary between men and women with OUD and may have important implications for treatment within the VHA but have not yet been studied. Methods: The present study utilized a data set that included all veterans receiving VHA health care during Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 (October 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012), who were diagnosed during the year with opioid dependence or abuse. VHA patients diagnosed with OUD nationwide in FY 2012 were compared by sex on proportions with OUD, and among those with OUD, on sociodemographic characteristics, medical, psychiatric and pain-related diagnoses, as well as on service use, and psychotropic and opioid agonist prescription fills. Results: During FY 2012, 48,408 veterans were diagnosed with OUD, 5.77% of whom were women. Among those veterans with OUD, few sociodemographic differences were observed between sexes. Female veterans had a higher rate of psychiatric diagnoses, notably mood, anxiety and personality disorders, as well as higher rates of pain-related diagnoses, such as headaches and fibromyalgia, while male veterans were more likely to have concurrent, severe medical co-morbidities, including hepatic disease, HIV, cancers, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes and related complications, and renal disease. There were few differences in health service utilization, with women reporting greater receipt of prescriptions for anxiolytic/sedative/hypnotics, stimulants and lithium. Men and women did not differ in receipt of opioid agonist medications or mental health/substance use treatments. Conclusions: There are substantial sex-specific differences in patterns of multimorbidity among veterans with OUD, spanning medical, psychiatric and pain-related diagnoses. These results illustrate the need to view OUD as a multimorbid condition and design interventions to target such multimorbidities. The present study highlights the potential benefits of sex-specific treatment and prevention efforts among female veterans with OUD and related co-occurring disorders.
{"title":"Sex Differences in Opioid Use Disorder Prevalence and Multimorbidity Nationally in the Veterans Health Administration.","authors":"MacKenzie R Peltier, Mehmet Sofuoglu, Ismene L Petrakis, Elina Stefanovics, Robert A Rosenheck","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2021.1904162","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2021.1904162","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a significant problem among US veterans with increasing rates of OUD and overdose, and thus has substantial importance for service delivery within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Among individuals with OUD, several sex- specific differences have begun to emerge regarding co-occurring medical, psychiatric and pain-related diagnoses. The rates of such multimorbidities are likely to vary between men and women with OUD and may have important implications for treatment within the VHA but have not yet been studied. <b>Methods:</b> The present study utilized a data set that included all veterans receiving VHA health care during Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 (October 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012), who were diagnosed during the year with opioid dependence or abuse. VHA patients diagnosed with OUD nationwide in FY 2012 were compared by sex on proportions with OUD, and among those with OUD, on sociodemographic characteristics, medical, psychiatric and pain-related diagnoses, as well as on service use, and psychotropic and opioid agonist prescription fills. <b>Results:</b> During FY 2012, 48,408 veterans were diagnosed with OUD, 5.77% of whom were women. Among those veterans with OUD, few sociodemographic differences were observed between sexes. Female veterans had a higher rate of psychiatric diagnoses, notably mood, anxiety and personality disorders, as well as higher rates of pain-related diagnoses, such as headaches and fibromyalgia, while male veterans were more likely to have concurrent, severe medical co-morbidities, including hepatic disease, HIV, cancers, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes and related complications, and renal disease. There were few differences in health service utilization, with women reporting greater receipt of prescriptions for anxiolytic/sedative/hypnotics, stimulants and lithium. Men and women did not differ in receipt of opioid agonist medications or mental health/substance use treatments. <b>Conclusions:</b> There are substantial sex-specific differences in patterns of multimorbidity among veterans with OUD, spanning medical, psychiatric and pain-related diagnoses. These results illustrate the need to view OUD as a multimorbid condition and design interventions to target such multimorbidities. The present study highlights the potential benefits of sex-specific treatment and prevention efforts among female veterans with OUD and related co-occurring disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":"17 2","pages":"124-134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15504263.2021.1904162","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10719309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-02DOI: 10.1080/15504263.2021.1864200
{"title":"Reviewers for Journal of Dual Diagnosis","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2021.1864200","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2021.1864200","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":"18 1","pages":"3 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85518743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01Epub Date: 2020-11-10DOI: 10.1080/15504263.2020.1828671
Sarah A Hartmann, Alison C McLeish
Objective: Anxiety sensitivity, distress tolerance, and emotion regulation difficulties have each demonstrated significant individual associations with problematic alcohol use and negative reinforcement motives for alcohol use among college students. However, extant research has yet to examine these three factors simultaneously with regard to the possibility of differential associations with alcohol consumption, alcohol-related problems and coping and conformity motives for alcohol use. As such, the present study sought to examine whether such differential associations exist within a sample of undergraduates reporting past year alcohol use. Methods: Participants were 379 undergraduate students reporting alcohol use in the past year who completed self-report measures for course credit. Results: After controlling for the effects of sex, lifetime marijuana use status, and negative affectivity, greater anxiety sensitivity social concerns and difficulties with emotional awareness were associated with more alcohol-related problems. Greater anxiety sensitivity social concerns and impulse control difficulties were associated with greater conformity alcohol use motives, and greater impulse control and emotional clarity difficulties were associated with greater coping motives. Conclusions: These findings suggest that greater fears of anxiety symptoms because of their potential negative social consequences and certain emotion regulation difficulties (i.e., impulse control, emotional clarity, emotional awareness) may be particularly problematic because they are associated with alcohol-related problems and negative reinforcement motives for use among undergraduates.
{"title":"Associations Between Transdiagnostic Cognitive-Affective Vulnerability Factors, Negative Reinforcement Drinking Motives, and Problematic Alcohol Use among Undergraduates.","authors":"Sarah A Hartmann, Alison C McLeish","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2020.1828671","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2020.1828671","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Anxiety sensitivity, distress tolerance, and emotion regulation difficulties have each demonstrated significant individual associations with problematic alcohol use and negative reinforcement motives for alcohol use among college students. However, extant research has yet to examine these three factors simultaneously with regard to the possibility of differential associations with alcohol consumption, alcohol-related problems and coping and conformity motives for alcohol use. As such, the present study sought to examine whether such differential associations exist within a sample of undergraduates reporting past year alcohol use. <b>Methods:</b> Participants were 379 undergraduate students reporting alcohol use in the past year who completed self-report measures for course credit. <b>Results:</b> After controlling for the effects of sex, lifetime marijuana use status, and negative affectivity, greater anxiety sensitivity social concerns and difficulties with emotional awareness were associated with more alcohol-related problems. Greater anxiety sensitivity social concerns and impulse control difficulties were associated with greater conformity alcohol use motives, and greater impulse control and emotional clarity difficulties were associated with greater coping motives. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings suggest that greater fears of anxiety symptoms because of their potential negative social consequences and certain emotion regulation difficulties (i.e., impulse control, emotional clarity, emotional awareness) may be particularly problematic because they are associated with alcohol-related problems and negative reinforcement motives for use among undergraduates.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":"17 1","pages":"13-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15504263.2020.1828671","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38584725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01Epub Date: 2020-12-14DOI: 10.1080/15504263.2020.1854411
Antoine Lebeaut, Maya Zegel, Samuel J Leonard, Brooke A Bartlett, Anka A Vujanovic
Objective: Firefighters represent a distinct group of first responders that are at heightened risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD). Assessing the role of transdiagnostic factors that underlie PTSD-AUD associations can inform specialized interventions among this population. This study included urban firefighters (N = 657) with probable PTSD-AUD (n = 27), probable PTSD-alone (n = 35), probable AUD-alone (n = 125), and trauma-exposure-only (n = 470). Methods: All firefighters completed a self-report, online questionnaire battery. Between group differences in anxiety sensitivity (AS), distress tolerance (DT), mindfulness, and emotional regulation difficulties (ERD) were assessed. It was hypothesized that firefighters with probable PTSD-AUD would endorse elevated AS and ERD, and reduced DT and mindfulness in comparison to all other diagnostic groups. Relationship status was included as a covariate in all comparisons. Results: Firefighters with probable PTSD-AUD endorsed elevated AS and ERD, and reduced DT and mindfulness in comparison to firefighters with trauma-exposure-only and probable AUD-alone. Firefighters with probable PTSD-AUD and probable PTSD-alone did not significantly differ. Conclusions: Given these findings, this line of inquiry has great potential to inform specialized, evidence-based mental health programming among firefighter populations, who represent a unique population susceptible to trauma-exposure, PTSD symptomology, and problematic alcohol use.
{"title":"Examining Transdiagnostic Factors among Firefighters in Relation to Trauma Exposure, Probable PTSD, and Probable Alcohol Use Disorder.","authors":"Antoine Lebeaut, Maya Zegel, Samuel J Leonard, Brooke A Bartlett, Anka A Vujanovic","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2020.1854411","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2020.1854411","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Firefighters represent a distinct group of first responders that are at heightened risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD). Assessing the role of transdiagnostic factors that underlie PTSD-AUD associations can inform specialized interventions among this population. This study included urban firefighters (<i>N</i> = 657) with probable PTSD-AUD (<i>n</i> = 27), probable PTSD-alone (<i>n</i> = 35), probable AUD-alone (<i>n</i> = 125), and trauma-exposure-only (<i>n</i> = 470). <b>Methods:</b> All firefighters completed a self-report, online questionnaire battery. Between group differences in anxiety sensitivity (AS), distress tolerance (DT), mindfulness, and emotional regulation difficulties (ERD) were assessed. It was hypothesized that firefighters with probable PTSD-AUD would endorse elevated AS and ERD, and reduced DT and mindfulness in comparison to all other diagnostic groups. Relationship status was included as a covariate in all comparisons. <b>Results:</b> Firefighters with probable PTSD-AUD endorsed elevated AS and ERD, and reduced DT and mindfulness in comparison to firefighters with trauma-exposure-only and probable AUD-alone. Firefighters with probable PTSD-AUD and probable PTSD-alone did not significantly differ. <b>Conclusions:</b> Given these findings, this line of inquiry has great potential to inform specialized, evidence-based mental health programming among firefighter populations, who represent a unique population susceptible to trauma-exposure, PTSD symptomology, and problematic alcohol use.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":"17 1","pages":"52-63"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15504263.2020.1854411","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38701577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01Epub Date: 2020-12-12DOI: 10.1080/15504263.2020.1854410
Sughashini Subramaniam, Anne Yee, Amer Siddiq Bin Amer Nordin, Ahmad Qabil Bin Khalib
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of alcohol or non-alcohol substance use dual diagnosis among inpatients with severe mental illness in a psychiatric institution in Malaysia. In addition, this study aimed to determine adverse outcomes between dual diagnosis versus single diagnosis. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the inpatient ward using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) to establish the diagnosis of severe mental illness and to screen for alcohol or non-alcohol substance use disorder comorbidity. Outcomes and severity of different domains among severe mental illness patients were assessed using the Addiction Severity Index (ASI). Results: Out of 152 patients who participated in this study, 51.3% (n = 78) had comorbid alcohol use disorder, and 29.6% (n = 45) had non-alcohol substance use disorder. Males with Kadazan ethnicity with severe mental illness and alcohol use disorder had a higher risk of having comorbid non-alcohol substance use disorder. Similarly, male Kadazan patients with severe mental illness and non-alcohol substance use disorder had a higher risk of having a comorbid alcohol use disorder. Dual diagnosis patients with alcohol and non-alcohol substance use disorder had higher rates of hospitalizations (p < .001 and p = .001). Family and social relationships were affected among the alcohol use disorder group as shown by the higher composite score for family status (FCOMP; p < .001). This group also showed more severe psychiatric status, as the composite score for psychiatric status (PCOMP) was high (p = .004). Suicidality was higher among patients with alcohol use disorder and severe mental illness (p < .001). Conclusions: The prevalence of severe mental illness dual diagnosis was high in this study with poorer outcomes, higher rates of admissions, and risk of suicidality. This highlights the importance of provisions for a more holistic treatment approach among patients with dual diagnosis.
{"title":"Prevalence of Severe Mental Illness Dual Diagnosis Among Inpatients in a Psychiatric Hospital in Malaysia.","authors":"Sughashini Subramaniam, Anne Yee, Amer Siddiq Bin Amer Nordin, Ahmad Qabil Bin Khalib","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2020.1854410","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2020.1854410","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of alcohol or non-alcohol substance use dual diagnosis among inpatients with severe mental illness in a psychiatric institution in Malaysia. In addition, this study aimed to determine adverse outcomes between dual diagnosis versus single diagnosis. <b>Methods:</b> This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the inpatient ward using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) to establish the diagnosis of severe mental illness and to screen for alcohol or non-alcohol substance use disorder comorbidity. Outcomes and severity of different domains among severe mental illness patients were assessed using the Addiction Severity Index (ASI). <b>Results:</b> Out of 152 patients who participated in this study, 51.3% (<i>n</i> = 78) had comorbid alcohol use disorder, and 29.6% (<i>n</i> = 45) had non-alcohol substance use disorder. Males with Kadazan ethnicity with severe mental illness and alcohol use disorder had a higher risk of having comorbid non-alcohol substance use disorder. Similarly, male Kadazan patients with severe mental illness and non-alcohol substance use disorder had a higher risk of having a comorbid alcohol use disorder. Dual diagnosis patients with alcohol and non-alcohol substance use disorder had higher rates of hospitalizations (<i>p</i> < .001 and <i>p</i> = .001). Family and social relationships were affected among the alcohol use disorder group as shown by the higher composite score for family status (FCOMP; <i>p</i> < .001). This group also showed more severe psychiatric status, as the composite score for psychiatric status (PCOMP) was high (<i>p</i> = .004). Suicidality was higher among patients with alcohol use disorder and severe mental illness (<i>p</i> < .001). <b>Conclusions:</b> The prevalence of severe mental illness dual diagnosis was high in this study with poorer outcomes, higher rates of admissions, and risk of suicidality. This highlights the importance of provisions for a more holistic treatment approach among patients with dual diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":"17 1","pages":"4-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38701574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Substance abuse comorbidity is highly prevalent and is linked to detrimental outcomes in individuals with psychotic disorder, but the role of personality traits as the underlying mechanism is being increasingly underscored. This study aimed to profile temperamental risks of comorbid substance use disorder in psychotic disorders by performing meta-analyses on personality trait differences between psychotic disorders with comorbidity (dual diagnosis; DD) and without it (psychotic disorders; PSD). Methods: A systematic review of English articles using PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses. Only original empirical studies including participants with diagnosis of psychotic disorders based on structured diagnostic interviews, with and without substance use disorder evaluated with reliable and valid tests were included. Articles were independently extracted by two authors using predefined data fields, including study quality indicators. All pooled analyses were based on random-effect models. Thirteen studies (N = 885) met our inclusion criteria. All effect-size estimates were calculated based on means and standard deviations of included measures. Separate effect size estimates were obtained for four traits in the UPPS model (negative urgency, low premeditation, low perseverance, sensation seeking), four traits in the HS model (unconscientious disinhibition, negative affect, disagreeable disinhibition, positive affect) and trait anhedonia. Results: Negative urgency (four studies with 262 participants; ES = 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.34, 0.84]), low premeditation (five studies with 349 participants; ES = 0.60; 95% CI [0.39, 0.80]), sensation seeking (seven studies with 550 participants; ES = 0.63; 95% CI [0.17, 1.09]) and unconscientious disinhibition (five studies with 291 participants; ES = 0.36; 95% CI [0.13, 0.59]) were elevated in DD than PSD. Heterogeneity of sensation seeking was significant (I2 = 86.2%). Conclusions: The findings of the current meta-analysis highlight a unique profile of impulsive and externalizing trait personality domains pertaining to DD. The study emphasizes the importance of emotion regulation interventions targeting impulsivity or negative affect (i.e. negative urgency, low premeditation) in substance abuse comorbidity patients.
{"title":"Personality Traits in Individuals with the Dual Diagnosis of Psychosis and Substance Use Disorders: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Hyeonju Oh, Seon-Kyeong Jang, Hyeon-Seung Lee, Eun-Byeol Lee, Kee-Hong Choi","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2020.1839827","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2020.1839827","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Substance abuse comorbidity is highly prevalent and is linked to detrimental outcomes in individuals with psychotic disorder, but the role of personality traits as the underlying mechanism is being increasingly underscored. This study aimed to profile temperamental risks of comorbid substance use disorder in psychotic disorders by performing meta-analyses on personality trait differences between psychotic disorders with comorbidity (dual diagnosis; DD) and without it (psychotic disorders; PSD). <b>Methods:</b> A systematic review of English articles using PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses. Only original empirical studies including participants with diagnosis of psychotic disorders based on structured diagnostic interviews, with and without substance use disorder evaluated with reliable and valid tests were included. Articles were independently extracted by two authors using predefined data fields, including study quality indicators. All pooled analyses were based on random-effect models. Thirteen studies (<i>N</i> = 885) met our inclusion criteria. All effect-size estimates were calculated based on means and standard deviations of included measures. Separate effect size estimates were obtained for four traits in the UPPS model (negative urgency, low premeditation, low perseverance, sensation seeking), four traits in the HS model (unconscientious disinhibition, negative affect, disagreeable disinhibition, positive affect) and trait anhedonia. <b>Results:</b> Negative urgency (four studies with 262 participants; ES = 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.34, 0.84]), low premeditation (five studies with 349 participants; ES = 0.60; 95% CI [0.39, 0.80]), sensation seeking (seven studies with 550 participants; ES = 0.63; 95% CI [0.17, 1.09]) and unconscientious disinhibition (five studies with 291 participants; ES = 0.36; 95% CI [0.13, 0.59]) were elevated in DD than PSD. Heterogeneity of sensation seeking was significant (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 86.2%). <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings of the current meta-analysis highlight a unique profile of impulsive and externalizing trait personality domains pertaining to DD. The study emphasizes the importance of emotion regulation interventions targeting impulsivity or negative affect (i.e. negative urgency, low premeditation) in substance abuse comorbidity patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":"17 1","pages":"34-51"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15504263.2020.1839827","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38787782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01Epub Date: 2020-10-13DOI: 10.1080/15504263.2020.1825892
Ryan Williams, Lorna Farquharson, Ellen Rhodes, Mary Dang, Jessica Butler, Alan Quirk, David S Baldwin, Mike J Crawford
<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Substance use disorders are commonly comorbid with anxiety and depressive disorders and are associated with poor treatment outcomes. The mechanisms underlying this association remain unclear-one possibility is that patients with anxiety/depressive disorders and substance use disorders receive poorer treatment. Concerns have been raised about the quality of inpatient care received by patients with substance use disorders. The purspose of this research was to examine the quality of care received by inpatients with an anxiety or depressive disorder, comparing subgroups with or without a comorbid substance use disorder. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective case-note review of 3,795 patients admitted to inpatient psychiatric wards in England. Data were gathered on all acute admissions with anxiety/depressive illness over a 6-month period, for a number of measures of quality of care derived from national standards. Association of coexisting substance use disorders with a variety of quality of care outcomes (relating to assessment, care planning, medication management, psychological therapies, discharge, crisis planning, and follow-up) was investigated using multivariable regression analyses. <b>Results:</b> In all, 543 (14.3%) patients in the study had a secondary diagnosis of a substance use disorder. Patients with substance use disorders were less likely to have had care plans that were developed jointly (i.e., with input from both patient and clinician; odds ratio [<i>OR</i>] = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.55, 0.93], <i>p</i> = .034) and less likely to have had their medication reviewed either during the admission (<i>OR</i> = 0.83, 95% CI [0.69, 0.94], <i>p</i> = .030) or at follow-up after discharge (<i>OR</i> = 0.58, 95% CI [0.39, 0.86], <i>p</i> = .007). Carers of patients with substance use disorders were less likely to have been provided with information about available support services (<i>OR</i> = 0.79, 95% CI [0.57, 0.98], <i>p</i> = .047). Patients with substance use disorders were less likely to have received adequate (at least 24 hours) notice in advance of their discharge (<i>OR</i> = 0.72, 95% CI [0.54, 0.96], <i>p</i> = .033), as were their carers (<i>OR</i> = 0.63, 95% CI [0.41, 0.85], <i>p</i> = .007). They were less likely to have a crisis plan in place at the point of discharge (<i>OR</i> = 0.85, 95% CI [0.74, 0.98], <i>p</i> = .044). There was also strong evidence that patients with substance use disorders were less likely to have been referred for psychological therapy (<i>OR</i> = 0.69, 95% CI [0.55, 0.87], <i>p</i> = .002). <b>Conclusions:</b> We found evidence of poorer quality of care for inpatients with anxiety and depressive disorders with comorbid substance use disorders, highlighting the need for more to be done to support these patients. Discrepancies in care quality may be contributed to the poor treatment outcomes experienced by patients with substance use disorders, and strategies
目的:物质使用障碍通常与焦虑和抑郁障碍共病,并与不良治疗结果相关。这种关联背后的机制尚不清楚——一种可能是焦虑/抑郁障碍和物质使用障碍患者接受的治疗较差。人们对药物使用障碍患者接受住院治疗的质量提出了关切。本研究的目的是检查患有焦虑或抑郁障碍的住院患者接受的护理质量,比较有或没有共病物质使用障碍的亚组。方法:这是一项对英国精神病住院病房的3795例患者的回顾性病例回顾。收集了6个月期间所有急性焦虑症/抑郁症入院患者的数据,根据国家标准对护理质量进行了一系列衡量。使用多变量回归分析调查共存物质使用障碍与各种护理结果质量(与评估、护理计划、药物管理、心理治疗、出院、危机计划和随访有关)的关系。结果:研究中总共有543例(14.3%)患者继发诊断为物质使用障碍。物质使用障碍患者不太可能有共同制定的护理计划(即,由患者和临床医生共同投入;优势比[OR] = 0.76, 95%可信区间[CI] [0.55, 0.93], p = 0.034),入院时(OR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.69, 0.94], p = 0.030)或出院后随访时(OR = 0.58, 95% CI [0.39, 0.86], p = 0.07)接受药物复查的可能性较小。物质使用障碍患者的护理人员较少可能获得有关可用支持服务的信息(OR = 0.79, 95% CI [0.57, 0.98], p = 0.047)。物质使用障碍患者在出院前获得足够(至少24小时)通知的可能性较小(OR = 0.72, 95% CI [0.54, 0.96], p = 0.033),其护理人员也是如此(OR = 0.63, 95% CI [0.41, 0.85], p = 0.007)。他们在出院时制定危机计划的可能性较低(OR = 0.85, 95% CI [0.74, 0.98], p = 0.044)。还有强有力的证据表明,有物质使用障碍的患者接受心理治疗的可能性较小(OR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.55, 0.87], p = 0.002)。结论:我们发现有证据表明焦虑和抑郁障碍合并物质使用障碍的住院患者的护理质量较差,强调需要做更多的工作来支持这些患者。护理质量的差异可能导致药物使用障碍患者的治疗结果不佳,减少这种不平等的策略对于改善这一重要患者群体的福祉是必要的。
{"title":"Impact of Substance Use Disorder on Quality of Inpatient Mental Health Services for People With Anxiety and Depression.","authors":"Ryan Williams, Lorna Farquharson, Ellen Rhodes, Mary Dang, Jessica Butler, Alan Quirk, David S Baldwin, Mike J Crawford","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2020.1825892","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2020.1825892","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Substance use disorders are commonly comorbid with anxiety and depressive disorders and are associated with poor treatment outcomes. The mechanisms underlying this association remain unclear-one possibility is that patients with anxiety/depressive disorders and substance use disorders receive poorer treatment. Concerns have been raised about the quality of inpatient care received by patients with substance use disorders. The purspose of this research was to examine the quality of care received by inpatients with an anxiety or depressive disorder, comparing subgroups with or without a comorbid substance use disorder. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective case-note review of 3,795 patients admitted to inpatient psychiatric wards in England. Data were gathered on all acute admissions with anxiety/depressive illness over a 6-month period, for a number of measures of quality of care derived from national standards. Association of coexisting substance use disorders with a variety of quality of care outcomes (relating to assessment, care planning, medication management, psychological therapies, discharge, crisis planning, and follow-up) was investigated using multivariable regression analyses. <b>Results:</b> In all, 543 (14.3%) patients in the study had a secondary diagnosis of a substance use disorder. Patients with substance use disorders were less likely to have had care plans that were developed jointly (i.e., with input from both patient and clinician; odds ratio [<i>OR</i>] = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.55, 0.93], <i>p</i> = .034) and less likely to have had their medication reviewed either during the admission (<i>OR</i> = 0.83, 95% CI [0.69, 0.94], <i>p</i> = .030) or at follow-up after discharge (<i>OR</i> = 0.58, 95% CI [0.39, 0.86], <i>p</i> = .007). Carers of patients with substance use disorders were less likely to have been provided with information about available support services (<i>OR</i> = 0.79, 95% CI [0.57, 0.98], <i>p</i> = .047). Patients with substance use disorders were less likely to have received adequate (at least 24 hours) notice in advance of their discharge (<i>OR</i> = 0.72, 95% CI [0.54, 0.96], <i>p</i> = .033), as were their carers (<i>OR</i> = 0.63, 95% CI [0.41, 0.85], <i>p</i> = .007). They were less likely to have a crisis plan in place at the point of discharge (<i>OR</i> = 0.85, 95% CI [0.74, 0.98], <i>p</i> = .044). There was also strong evidence that patients with substance use disorders were less likely to have been referred for psychological therapy (<i>OR</i> = 0.69, 95% CI [0.55, 0.87], <i>p</i> = .002). <b>Conclusions:</b> We found evidence of poorer quality of care for inpatients with anxiety and depressive disorders with comorbid substance use disorders, highlighting the need for more to be done to support these patients. Discrepancies in care quality may be contributed to the poor treatment outcomes experienced by patients with substance use disorders, and strategies","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":"17 1","pages":"80-93"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15504263.2020.1825892","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38578255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01Epub Date: 2021-01-05DOI: 10.1080/15504263.2021.1864137
E Sherwood Brown
{"title":"<i>Journal of Dual Diagnosis</i>: Highlights from the 2020 Issues.","authors":"E Sherwood Brown","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2021.1864137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2021.1864137","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":"17 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15504263.2021.1864137","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38782284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01Epub Date: 2020-12-10DOI: 10.1080/15504263.2020.1849887
Yiyang Liu, JeeWon Cheong, Barry Setlow, Linda B Cottler
Objectives: Cocaine use is on the rise and it is comorbid with marijuana use. We examined the association between lifetime cocaine + marijuana polysubstance use (CM PSU) versus cocaine only and lifetime cocaine use disorder (CocUD) and examined the potential mediation by cocaine use patterns. Methods: A total of 2,968 lifetime cocaine users were identified from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III. Mediation analysis was utilized to examine cocaine use quantity, frequency, and duration as potential mediators in the association between CM PSU and CocUD. A parallel multiple mediator model and a structural equation model were used, respectively, to examine: (1) the individual contribution of cocaine use quantity, frequency, and duration, and (2) combined contribution as a set specified by a latent variable. Results: Cocaine users were divided into 2,782 (93.7%) CM polysubstance users and 186 (6.3%) cocaine only users. CM PSU was associated with decreased risk of CocUD, but after including the mediators, the association was no longer significant. Examined separately, only quantity was found to be a significant mediator over and above frequency and duration, while the latent variable with three cocaine use pattern indicators explained 56.6% of the total association between CM PSU and CocUD. Conclusions: Compared to cocaine only users, CM polysubstance users were less likely to use cocaine heavily; this lower intensity of cocaine use was in turn associated with decreased risk of CocUD. Future research is warranted to determine the nature of the association between CM PSU and reduced CocUD.
{"title":"Cocaine and Marijuana Polysubstance Use and Cocaine Use Disorder: Investigating Mediated Effects through Patterns of Cocaine Use.","authors":"Yiyang Liu, JeeWon Cheong, Barry Setlow, Linda B Cottler","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2020.1849887","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2020.1849887","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cocaine use is on the rise and it is comorbid with marijuana use. We examined the association between lifetime cocaine + marijuana polysubstance use (CM PSU) versus cocaine only and lifetime cocaine use disorder (CocUD) and examined the potential mediation by cocaine use patterns. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 2,968 lifetime cocaine users were identified from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III. Mediation analysis was utilized to examine cocaine use quantity, frequency, and duration as potential mediators in the association between CM PSU and CocUD. A parallel multiple mediator model and a structural equation model were used, respectively, to examine: (1) the individual contribution of cocaine use quantity, frequency, and duration, and (2) combined contribution as a set specified by a latent variable. <b>Results:</b> Cocaine users were divided into 2,782 (93.7%) CM polysubstance users and 186 (6.3%) cocaine only users. CM PSU was associated with decreased risk of CocUD, but after including the mediators, the association was no longer significant. Examined separately, only quantity was found to be a significant mediator over and above frequency and duration, while the latent variable with three cocaine use pattern indicators explained 56.6% of the total association between CM PSU and CocUD. <b>Conclusions:</b> Compared to cocaine only users, CM polysubstance users were less likely to use cocaine heavily; this lower intensity of cocaine use was in turn associated with decreased risk of CocUD. Future research is warranted to determine the nature of the association between CM PSU and reduced CocUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":"17 1","pages":"23-33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15504263.2020.1849887","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38357404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01Epub Date: 2020-10-22DOI: 10.1080/15504263.2020.1829769
Enrique Moraleda-Barreno, María Del Pilar Cáceres Pachón, Óscar M Lozano, Pedro J Pérez Moreno, José Andrés Lorca Marín, Fermín Fernández-Calderón, Carmen Díaz Batanero, Jesús Gómez-Bujedo
Objective: The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the evidence for impaired executive functioning in patients diagnosed with a dual pathology of personality disorder (PD) and substance use disorder, and to identify whether differences exist in comparison to those with a single diagnosis. Methods: A systematic search was conducted to identify studies using measures of executive functioning in patients with PD-substance use disorder dual pathology. Sixteen studies were selected. Results: The results indicate that dual pathology patients with Cluster C personality disorder do not differ from controls, and that the presence of dual pathology does not influence the updating domain of executive functioning. The findings were inconclusive with regard to dual pathology patients with Cluster B personality disorders. Whilst the various studies consistently show that these patients show worse performance than the control groups, here are contradictory results with regard to whether Cluster B personality disorders add more alterations in executive functioning to those that already appear in substance use disorder. Conclusions: The results suggest the need for further research that more adequately controls variables such as time in treatment, medication, and sample size, whilst there is also a need to employ longitudinal designs that include more patients from Clusters A and C.
{"title":"Impairments in Executive Functioning in Patients with Comorbid Substance Use and Personality Disorders: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Enrique Moraleda-Barreno, María Del Pilar Cáceres Pachón, Óscar M Lozano, Pedro J Pérez Moreno, José Andrés Lorca Marín, Fermín Fernández-Calderón, Carmen Díaz Batanero, Jesús Gómez-Bujedo","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2020.1829769","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2020.1829769","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the evidence for impaired executive functioning in patients diagnosed with a dual pathology of personality disorder (PD) and substance use disorder, and to identify whether differences exist in comparison to those with a single diagnosis. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic search was conducted to identify studies using measures of executive functioning in patients with PD-substance use disorder dual pathology. Sixteen studies were selected. <b>Results:</b> The results indicate that dual pathology patients with Cluster C personality disorder do not differ from controls, and that the presence of dual pathology does not influence the updating domain of executive functioning. The findings were inconclusive with regard to dual pathology patients with Cluster B personality disorders. Whilst the various studies consistently show that these patients show worse performance than the control groups, here are contradictory results with regard to whether Cluster B personality disorders add more alterations in executive functioning to those that already appear in substance use disorder. <b>Conclusions:</b> The results suggest the need for further research that more adequately controls variables such as time in treatment, medication, and sample size, whilst there is also a need to employ longitudinal designs that include more patients from Clusters A and C.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":"17 1","pages":"64-79"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15504263.2020.1829769","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38519809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}