首页 > 最新文献

British Journal of Pain最新文献

英文 中文
Feasibility of attention-based virtual reality interventions in fibromyalgia syndrome: comparing systems, virtual environments and activities. 基于注意力的虚拟现实干预纤维肌痛综合征的可行性:比较系统、虚拟环境和活动。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-04 DOI: 10.1177/20494637241310696
Jordan Tsigarides, Vanessa Grove, Jacqueline Chipping, Jack Dainty, Susan Miles, Nicholas Shenker, Saber Sami, Alexander Macgregor

Background: Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS) is highly prevalent with a significant associated morbidity and socioeconomic burden. Effective treatments for FMS remain elusive with pharmacological management (including use of opioids) often proving ineffective. There is a need to develop accessible, innovative management approaches to improve patient care.Virtual reality (VR) interventions have shown evidence of efficacy in the management of acute pain and chronic low back pain, but their feasibility in FMS has not hitherto been explored.

Methods: This feasibility study investigates the use of four different VR systems, four interactive VR activities and two virtual environments in patients with FMS. Acceptability (including adverse effects) and study engagement were the main outcomes investigated. Clinical outcome data on pain and mood were also collected to gather preliminary information for future studies.

Results: The results demonstrated good feasibility across VR systems, activities and virtual environments with high levels of acceptability, low frequency of adverse effects, and positive perceptions of VR in patients with FMS. Reporting of adverse effects (including fatigue) varied across different VR components, with system comfort and virtual environmental design being particularly important.

Conclusions: The findings increase our confidence with respect to the feasibility of using VR in people with FMS, help to inform future randomised controlled trials and emphasise the importance of tailored interventional design for future VR therapeutics.

背景:纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)非常普遍,具有显著的发病率和社会经济负担。FMS的有效治疗仍然难以捉摸,药理学管理(包括使用阿片类药物)往往被证明无效。有必要开发可获得的、创新的管理方法来改善患者护理。虚拟现实(VR)干预在治疗急性疼痛和慢性腰痛方面已显示出疗效,但其在FMS中的可行性迄今尚未得到探讨。方法:本可行性研究探讨了四种不同的虚拟现实系统、四种交互式虚拟现实活动和两种虚拟环境在FMS患者中的应用。可接受性(包括不良反应)和学习投入是调查的主要结果。还收集了疼痛和情绪的临床结果数据,为未来的研究收集初步信息。结果:结果表明,虚拟现实系统、活动和虚拟环境具有良好的可行性,可接受性高,不良反应频率低,FMS患者对虚拟现实有积极的看法。报告的不良影响(包括疲劳)因不同的VR组件而异,其中系统舒适性和虚拟环境设计尤为重要。结论:这些发现增加了我们对在FMS患者中使用VR的可行性的信心,有助于为未来的随机对照试验提供信息,并强调了未来VR治疗量身定制介入设计的重要性。
{"title":"Feasibility of attention-based virtual reality interventions in fibromyalgia syndrome: comparing systems, virtual environments and activities.","authors":"Jordan Tsigarides, Vanessa Grove, Jacqueline Chipping, Jack Dainty, Susan Miles, Nicholas Shenker, Saber Sami, Alexander Macgregor","doi":"10.1177/20494637241310696","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637241310696","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS) is highly prevalent with a significant associated morbidity and socioeconomic burden. Effective treatments for FMS remain elusive with pharmacological management (including use of opioids) often proving ineffective. There is a need to develop accessible, innovative management approaches to improve patient care.Virtual reality (VR) interventions have shown evidence of efficacy in the management of acute pain and chronic low back pain, but their feasibility in FMS has not hitherto been explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This feasibility study investigates the use of four different VR systems, four interactive VR activities and two virtual environments in patients with FMS. Acceptability (including adverse effects) and study engagement were the main outcomes investigated. Clinical outcome data on pain and mood were also collected to gather preliminary information for future studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results demonstrated good feasibility across VR systems, activities and virtual environments with high levels of acceptability, low frequency of adverse effects, and positive perceptions of VR in patients with FMS. Reporting of adverse effects (including fatigue) varied across different VR components, with system comfort and virtual environmental design being particularly important.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings increase our confidence with respect to the feasibility of using VR in people with FMS, help to inform future randomised controlled trials and emphasise the importance of tailored interventional design for future VR therapeutics.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":"19 2","pages":"71-85"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11700397/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145901183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Global and regional trends and projections of chronic pain from 1990 to 2035: Analyses based on global burden of diseases study 2019. 1990 - 2035年全球和区域慢性疼痛趋势和预测:基于2019年全球疾病负担研究的分析
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-24 DOI: 10.1177/20494637241310697
Mengyi Zhu, Jiarui Zhang, Diefei Liang, Junxiong Qiu, Yuan Fu, Zhaopei Zeng, Jingjun Han, Junmeng Zheng, Liling Lin

Background: Chronic pain poses a significant public health challenge. We present the global and regional data on Prevalence, Incidence and Years Lived with Disability (YLDs) for Chronic pain from the Global burden of disease (GBD) study 2019 data and analyze their associations with Socio-demographic index (SDI), age, and gender, and the future trends from 2020 to 2035.

Methods: Regional trends in the burden of chronic pain and its association with age, gender, and SDI were assessed from 1990 to 2019. Joinpoint analysis was employed to describe trends in chronic pain burden across different SDI regions. Additionally, the Bayesian Age-Period-Cohort model (BAPC) was used for predicting future trends. Age-standardized rates (ASRs) of prevalence, incidence, and YLDs were employed to quantify the burden of chronic pain.

Results: Between 1990 and 2019, a significant increase was observed in global prevalence and YLDs rates of chronic pain. Higher rates were found among females, whereas a faster rise was noted among males. Notably, Low Back Pain (LBP) and Migraine accounted for predominant YLDs globally, particularly among those aged 75 and above. A notable prevalence of Tension-type Headache (TTH) was observed among younger populations. Furthermore, ASRs for chronic pain were highest in high-SDI regions. Projections suggest an increase in headache ASRs globally for both genders from 2020 to 2035.

Conclusion: From 1990 to 2019, the global burden of chronic pain increased significantly, with projections indicating a continued rise in headache burden over the next 15 years, underscoring the need for heightened attention to these issues.

背景:慢性疼痛是一个重大的公共卫生挑战。我们介绍了2019年全球疾病负担(GBD)研究中慢性疼痛的患病率、发病率和残疾生活年数(YLDs)的全球和区域数据,并分析了它们与社会人口指数(SDI)、年龄和性别的关系,以及2020年至2035年的未来趋势。方法:评估1990年至2019年慢性疼痛负担的区域趋势及其与年龄、性别和SDI的关系。采用关节点分析来描述不同SDI地区慢性疼痛负担的趋势。此外,贝叶斯年龄-时期-队列模型(BAPC)用于预测未来趋势。采用流行率、发病率和YLDs的年龄标准化率(ASRs)来量化慢性疼痛的负担。结果:1990年至2019年期间,慢性疼痛的全球患病率和死亡率显著上升。女性的发病率更高,而男性的发病率上升得更快。值得注意的是,腰痛和偏头痛占全球主要的YLDs,特别是在75岁及以上的人群中。紧张型头痛(TTH)在年轻人群中显著流行。此外,慢性疼痛的asr在高sdi区域最高。预测表明,从2020年到2035年,全球范围内的头痛性asr病例不论男女都在增加。结论:从1990年到2019年,全球慢性疼痛负担显著增加,预测显示未来15年头痛负担将继续增加,强调需要高度关注这些问题。
{"title":"Global and regional trends and projections of chronic pain from 1990 to 2035: Analyses based on global burden of diseases study 2019.","authors":"Mengyi Zhu, Jiarui Zhang, Diefei Liang, Junxiong Qiu, Yuan Fu, Zhaopei Zeng, Jingjun Han, Junmeng Zheng, Liling Lin","doi":"10.1177/20494637241310697","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637241310697","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pain poses a significant public health challenge. We present the global and regional data on Prevalence, Incidence and Years Lived with Disability (YLDs) for Chronic pain from the Global burden of disease (GBD) study 2019 data and analyze their associations with Socio-demographic index (SDI), age, and gender, and the future trends from 2020 to 2035.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Regional trends in the burden of chronic pain and its association with age, gender, and SDI were assessed from 1990 to 2019. Joinpoint analysis was employed to describe trends in chronic pain burden across different SDI regions. Additionally, the Bayesian Age-Period-Cohort model (BAPC) was used for predicting future trends. Age-standardized rates (ASRs) of prevalence, incidence, and YLDs were employed to quantify the burden of chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 1990 and 2019, a significant increase was observed in global prevalence and YLDs rates of chronic pain. Higher rates were found among females, whereas a faster rise was noted among males. Notably, Low Back Pain (LBP) and Migraine accounted for predominant YLDs globally, particularly among those aged 75 and above. A notable prevalence of Tension-type Headache (TTH) was observed among younger populations. Furthermore, ASRs for chronic pain were highest in high-SDI regions. Projections suggest an increase in headache ASRs globally for both genders from 2020 to 2035.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From 1990 to 2019, the global burden of chronic pain increased significantly, with projections indicating a continued rise in headache burden over the next 15 years, underscoring the need for heightened attention to these issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"125-137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669129/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of equine interactions on human acute pain perception: Two cross sectional studies. 马的相互作用对人类急性疼痛感知的影响:两个横断面研究。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI: 10.1177/20494637241302391
Gwyneth Doherty-Sneddon, Roberta Caiazza, Emilia Pawlowska, Quoc Vuong

Background: Research has demonstrated the effectiveness of Animal-Assisted Therapy, usually involving dogs, as a way to reduce pain in inpatient and outpatient populations. Here two studies investigate the effectiveness of interacting with horses for reducing human acute pain perception.

Methods: In Study 1, a blood-pressure cuff was used to administer acute ischaemic pain to 70 adult participants, who were allocated to one of three groups: Equine Assisted Psychotherapy (EAP), Horse Interaction without EAP (HI), and a Control (no horses present). All participants engaged in an activity (finding a horse treat) in a large, enclosed arena. The dependent variable was the subjective pain rating (scale 0-10) of the participant in response to moderate pain induced pre- and post-activity. In Study 2, 53 adult participants were recruited and allocated to either an Equine Assisted Learning (EAL) Group or a Control Group. The same paradigm was used. Following the activity sessions, qualitative data was elicited from the participants regarding their insights and feelings. It was hypothesized that any interaction with horses would significantly reduce an individual's perception of pain.

Results: In both studies, planned paired-samples t-tests showed significant reductions in pain ratings from pre-activity to post-activity in the EAL, EAP and HI groups (large and medium effect sizes) but not the Control groups. Thematic analysis of the qualitative responses showed an overwhelmingly positive array of responses from those who interacted with the horses, for example, feeling relaxed and happy during the activity.

Conclusion: Interactions with horses can reduce acute pain perception. Distraction, physiological changes, and positive emotions are discussed as possible underlying mechanisms. It remains to be seen how this could be more widely applied, for example, in relation to chronic pain.

背景:研究已经证明了动物辅助疗法的有效性,通常涉及狗,作为一种减少住院和门诊患者疼痛的方法。这里有两项研究调查了与马互动减少人类急性疼痛感知的有效性。方法:在研究1中,使用血压袖带给70名成年参与者施加急性缺血性疼痛,他们被分配到三组中的一组:马辅助心理治疗(EAP),没有EAP的马互动(HI)和对照组(没有马)。在一个大的、封闭的竞技场中,所有的参与者参与一项活动(找马吃的)。因变量是参与者在活动前和活动后对中度疼痛的主观疼痛评分(评分0-10)。在研究2中,招募了53名成年参与者并将其分配到马辅助学习组(EAL)和对照组。使用了相同的范式。活动结束后,从参与者那里获得了关于他们的见解和感受的定性数据。据推测,与马的任何互动都会显著降低个体对疼痛的感知。结果:在两项研究中,计划配对样本t检验显示,EAL组、EAP组和HI组(大、中效应量)从活动前到活动后疼痛评分显著降低,但对照组没有。对定性反应的主题分析显示,那些与马互动的人的反应非常积极,例如,在活动中感到放松和快乐。结论:与马互动可减轻急性疼痛知觉。分散注意力、生理变化和积极情绪是可能的潜在机制。如何将其更广泛地应用,例如,与慢性疼痛有关,还有待观察。
{"title":"Impact of equine interactions on human acute pain perception: Two cross sectional studies.","authors":"Gwyneth Doherty-Sneddon, Roberta Caiazza, Emilia Pawlowska, Quoc Vuong","doi":"10.1177/20494637241302391","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637241302391","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research has demonstrated the effectiveness of Animal-Assisted Therapy, usually involving dogs, as a way to reduce pain in inpatient and outpatient populations. Here two studies investigate the effectiveness of interacting with horses for reducing human acute pain perception.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In Study 1, a blood-pressure cuff was used to administer acute ischaemic pain to 70 adult participants, who were allocated to one of three groups: Equine Assisted Psychotherapy (EAP), Horse Interaction without EAP (HI), and a Control (no horses present). All participants engaged in an activity (finding a horse treat) in a large, enclosed arena. The dependent variable was the subjective pain rating (scale 0-10) of the participant in response to moderate pain induced pre- and post-activity. In Study 2, 53 adult participants were recruited and allocated to either an Equine Assisted Learning (EAL) Group or a Control Group. The same paradigm was used. Following the activity sessions, qualitative data was elicited from the participants regarding their insights and feelings. It was hypothesized that any interaction with horses would significantly reduce an individual's perception of pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both studies, planned paired-samples t-tests showed significant reductions in pain ratings from pre-activity to post-activity in the EAL, EAP and HI groups (large and medium effect sizes) but not the Control groups. Thematic analysis of the qualitative responses showed an overwhelmingly positive array of responses from those who interacted with the horses, for example, feeling relaxed and happy during the activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interactions with horses can reduce acute pain perception. Distraction, physiological changes, and positive emotions are discussed as possible underlying mechanisms. It remains to be seen how this could be more widely applied, for example, in relation to chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"100-114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607707/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142773631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Wrist and ankle acupuncture relief moderate to severe postoperative pain after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: A randomized controlled study. 腕踝针灸缓解功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术后中度至重度术后疼痛:一项随机对照研究。
IF 1.3 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-24 DOI: 10.1177/20494637241264941
Suying Guo, Yaqin Wang, Jianwei Ai, Jingyi Zhao, Shaoting Huang, Junge Wang

Introduction: The study aimed to validate the effectiveness of Wrist and Ankle Acupuncture (WAA) in attenuating moderate to severe postoperative pain following Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS).

Methods: Participants were randomly allocated into a treatment group (n = 57) and a control group (n = 58). The treatment group underwent WAA treatment, while the control group received sham acupuncture treatment. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was employed to assess postoperative pain. The sleep efficiency, the amount of rescue medication, and the adverse events were also evaluated for both groups.

Results: A significant immediate reduction in NRS scores was observed in the treatment group (p < .01). At 2, 4, 8, 22, and 24 h after first treatment, pain intensity decreased in the WAA group compared with the control group (p < .01). Moreover, the WAA group demonstrated superior sleep efficiency relative to the control group on the night after surgery (p < .01). And the mean number of rescue tablets used on the WAA group was obviously lower than the control group (p < .01). There were no serious adverse events in both groups, and all adverse events completely disappeared within 3 days.

Conclusion: WAA effectively alleviated postoperative discomfort associated with nasal packing subsequent to FESS and enhanced sleep quality during the postoperative night. The anatomical superficiality of the acupuncture points employed reduces the risk of adverse events while yielding effective analgesic results, thus validating its suitability for clinical application.

简介:本研究旨在验证腕踝针刺(WAA)减轻功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)术后中至重度疼痛的有效性。方法:将参与者随机分为治疗组(n = 57)和对照组(n = 58)。治疗组采用WAA治疗,对照组采用假针刺治疗。采用数字评定量表(NRS)评估术后疼痛。对两组患者的睡眠效率、抢救用药量及不良事件发生率进行评价。结果:治疗组患者NRS评分即刻显著降低(p < 0.01)。第一次治疗后2、4、8、22、24 h, WAA组疼痛强度较对照组降低(p < 0.01)。此外,WAA组在术后当晚的睡眠效率优于对照组(p < 0.01)。WAA组患者平均用药次数明显低于对照组(p < 0.01)。两组均未见严重不良事件发生,不良事件均在3 d内完全消失。结论:WAA可有效缓解FESS术后鼻塞不适,提高术后夜间睡眠质量。所采用的穴位解剖浅表性降低了不良事件的风险,同时产生了有效的镇痛效果,从而验证了其临床应用的适用性。
{"title":"Wrist and ankle acupuncture relief moderate to severe postoperative pain after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: A randomized controlled study.","authors":"Suying Guo, Yaqin Wang, Jianwei Ai, Jingyi Zhao, Shaoting Huang, Junge Wang","doi":"10.1177/20494637241264941","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637241264941","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The study aimed to validate the effectiveness of Wrist and Ankle Acupuncture (WAA) in attenuating moderate to severe postoperative pain following Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomly allocated into a treatment group (<i>n</i> = 57) and a control group (<i>n</i> = 58). The treatment group underwent WAA treatment, while the control group received sham acupuncture treatment. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was employed to assess postoperative pain. The sleep efficiency, the amount of rescue medication, and the adverse events were also evaluated for both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant immediate reduction in NRS scores was observed in the treatment group (<i>p</i> < .01). At 2, 4, 8, 22, and 24 h after first treatment, pain intensity decreased in the WAA group compared with the control group (<i>p</i> < .01). Moreover, the WAA group demonstrated superior sleep efficiency relative to the control group on the night after surgery (<i>p</i> < .01). And the mean number of rescue tablets used on the WAA group was obviously lower than the control group (<i>p</i> < .01). There were no serious adverse events in both groups, and all adverse events completely disappeared within 3 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WAA effectively alleviated postoperative discomfort associated with nasal packing subsequent to FESS and enhanced sleep quality during the postoperative night. The anatomical superficiality of the acupuncture points employed reduces the risk of adverse events while yielding effective analgesic results, thus validating its suitability for clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":"19 2","pages":"115-124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894722/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143617297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
No association exists between the use of implantable systems and longer survival in advanced cancer patients. 在晚期癌症患者中,植入系统的使用与更长的生存期之间不存在关联。
IF 1.3 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-16 DOI: 10.1177/20494637241264010
Sebastiano Mercadante
{"title":"No association exists between the use of implantable systems and longer survival in advanced cancer patients.","authors":"Sebastiano Mercadante","doi":"10.1177/20494637241264010","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637241264010","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":"19 2","pages":"138-139"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912157/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143659044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Community opioid dispensing after rib fracture injuries: CODI study. 肋骨骨折伤后的社区阿片类药物分配:CODI 研究。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.1177/20494637241300264
Frances Williamson, Melanie Proper, Rania Shibl, Susanna Cramb, Victoria McCreanor, Jacelle Warren, Cate Cameron

Background: Pain from rib fractures often requires inpatient management with opioid medication. The need for ongoing opioid prescriptions following hospital discharge is poorly understood. Harms associated with long-term opioid use are generally accepted. However, a deeper understanding of current prescribing patterns in this population at-risk is required.

Methods: A retrospective cohort of adult patients hospitalised in Queensland, Australia between 2014 and 2015 with rib fractures (ICD-10-AM: S22.3, S22.4, S22.5), was obtained from the Community Opioid Dispensing after Injury (CODI) study, which includes person-linked hospitalisation, mortality and community opioid dispensing data. Data were extracted 90-days prior to the index-hospitalisation and 720-days after discharge. Factors associated with long-duration (>90 days cumulatively) and increased end-dose were examined using multivariable logistic regressions, odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Results: In total, 4306 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 58.8% had opioids dispensed in the community within 30 days of hospital discharge. 23.6% had long-duration dispensing and 13.7% increased opioid end-doses. Pre-injury opioid use was most associated with long-duration (OR = 12.00, 95% CI 8.99-16.01) and increased end-dose (OR = 9.00, 95% CI 6.75-12.00). Females and older persons had higher odds of long-duration dispensing (Females OR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.38-2.22; Age 65+ OR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.32-2.61). Injury severity and presence of concurrent injuries were not statistically significantly associated with duration or dose (p > .05). Subsequent hospitalisations and death during the follow-up period had statistically significant associations with long-duration and increased end-dose (p < .001).

Conclusion: Opiate prescribing following rib fractures is prolonged in older, and female patients, beyond the traditionally reported recovery time frames requiring analgesia. Previous opioid use (without dependence) is associated with long-duration opioid use and increased end-dose in rib fracture patients. These results support the need for a collaborative health system approach and individualised strategies for high-risk patients with rib fractures to reduce long-term opiate use.

Level of evidence: Level III, Prognostic/Epidemiological.

背景:肋骨骨折引起的疼痛通常需要住院患者使用阿片类药物进行治疗。人们对出院后是否需要继续处方阿片类药物知之甚少。长期使用阿片类药物的危害已被普遍接受。然而,我们需要更深入地了解这一高危人群目前的处方模式:从 "受伤后社区阿片类药物配药"(CODI)研究中获得了 2014 年至 2015 年期间在澳大利亚昆士兰州因肋骨骨折(ICD-10-AM:S22.3、S22.4、S22.5)住院的成年患者的回顾性队列,其中包括与个人相关的住院、死亡和社区阿片类药物配药数据。数据提取时间为指数住院前 90 天和出院后 720 天。使用多变量逻辑回归、几率比(OR)和 95% 置信区间(95% CI)研究了与长期用药(累计超过 90 天)和最终用药量增加相关的因素:共有 4306 名患者符合纳入标准,58.8% 的患者在出院后 30 天内在社区配发了阿片类药物。23.6%的患者长期使用阿片类药物,13.7%的患者增加了阿片类药物的最终用量。受伤前使用阿片类药物与长期使用(OR = 12.00,95% CI 8.99-16.01)和最终剂量增加(OR = 9.00,95% CI 6.75-12.00)关系最大。女性和老年人长期配药的几率更高(女性 OR = 1.75,95% CI 1.38-2.22;65 岁以上 OR = 1.86,95% CI 1.32-2.61)。受伤严重程度和是否同时受伤与持续时间或剂量无明显统计学关联(P > .05)。随访期间的后续住院和死亡与持续时间长和最终剂量增加有统计学意义(p < .001):结论:年龄较大的女性患者在肋骨骨折后使用阿片类药物的时间较长,超过了传统报告的需要镇痛的恢复时间。曾使用阿片类药物(无依赖性)与肋骨骨折患者长期使用阿片类药物和最终用量增加有关。这些结果支持了对肋骨骨折高危患者采取医疗系统协作方法和个性化策略的必要性,以减少阿片类药物的长期使用:III级,预后/流行病学。
{"title":"Community opioid dispensing after rib fracture injuries: CODI study.","authors":"Frances Williamson, Melanie Proper, Rania Shibl, Susanna Cramb, Victoria McCreanor, Jacelle Warren, Cate Cameron","doi":"10.1177/20494637241300264","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637241300264","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain from rib fractures often requires inpatient management with opioid medication. The need for ongoing opioid prescriptions following hospital discharge is poorly understood. Harms associated with long-term opioid use are generally accepted. However, a deeper understanding of current prescribing patterns in this population at-risk is required.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort of adult patients hospitalised in Queensland, Australia between 2014 and 2015 with rib fractures (ICD-10-AM: S22.3, S22.4, S22.5), was obtained from the Community Opioid Dispensing after Injury (CODI) study, which includes person-linked hospitalisation, mortality and community opioid dispensing data. Data were extracted 90-days prior to the index-hospitalisation and 720-days after discharge. Factors associated with long-duration (>90 days cumulatively) and increased end-dose were examined using multivariable logistic regressions, odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 4306 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 58.8% had opioids dispensed in the community within 30 days of hospital discharge. 23.6% had long-duration dispensing and 13.7% increased opioid end-doses. Pre-injury opioid use was most associated with long-duration (OR = 12.00, 95% CI 8.99-16.01) and increased end-dose (OR = 9.00, 95% CI 6.75-12.00). Females and older persons had higher odds of long-duration dispensing (Females OR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.38-2.22; Age 65+ OR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.32-2.61). Injury severity and presence of concurrent injuries were not statistically significantly associated with duration or dose (<i>p</i> > .05). Subsequent hospitalisations and death during the follow-up period had statistically significant associations with long-duration and increased end-dose (<i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Opiate prescribing following rib fractures is prolonged in older, and female patients, beyond the traditionally reported recovery time frames requiring analgesia. Previous opioid use (without dependence) is associated with long-duration opioid use and increased end-dose in rib fracture patients. These results support the need for a collaborative health system approach and individualised strategies for high-risk patients with rib fractures to reduce long-term opiate use.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, Prognostic/Epidemiological.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"86-99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577336/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142689229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of prehabilitation on outcomes following elective lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 择期腰椎手术后康复对预后的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1.3 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI: 10.1177/20494637251323175
Lisandra Almeida de Oliveira, Julian Anthony Vitale, Jasmeet Singh Sachdeva, Srikesh Rudrapatna, Sava Ivosevic, Najih Nuradin Ismail, Anthony Cubello, Y V Raghava Neelapala, Nora Bakaa, Diego Roger-Silva, Luciana Macedo

Background: Elective lumbar spine surgery is increasingly being implemented to treat patients with specific low back pain. However, approximately 30% of patients continue to have long-term pain and disability after surgery.

Objective: The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on the effectiveness of pre-surgical rehabilitation (prehab) alone or in combination with usual care versus usual care on patient-oriented outcomes and health-related costs following elective lumbar spine surgery.

Data sources: Electronic databases from MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and AMED were systematically searched from their inception to November 2022.

Study selection: Randomized controlled trials that examined adult (age >18 years) prehab programs and evaluated one or more outcomes of interest were included in this review.

Data extraction: In pairs, six reviewers independently conducted a risk-of-bias assessment and extracted outcome data from included studies, in accordance with the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR). A meta-analysis was conducted when trials were homogeneous.

Data synthesis: A total of eight trials (n = 739 participants), reported in 13 different manuscripts, were eligible for inclusion. Exercise prehab interventions are superior to usual care for disability at 3-month (MD: -2.56, 95% CI -4.98 to -0.15), back pain at 6-month (MD: -6.65, 95% CI -13.25 to -0.05), and health-related costs (MD: €2572.8, 95% CI: €1963.0 to €3182.5). CBT prehab interventions seem to be superior to usual care for back pain at 3-month (MD: -7.3, 95% CI: -14.5 to -0.05). Individual trials showed that education prehab interventions may be superior to usual for back pain at 1-month post-operative (MD: 12.3, 95% CI: 0.9 to 23.7).

Limitations: Overall, the inclusion of heterogeneous trials (e.g., diagnosis, types of surgery, dosage, content, and duration of interventions) with small sample sizes leads to inconclusive and very low certainty of effect estimates.

Conclusion: The present systematic review has brought to light the dearth of high-quality evidence in support of prehab interventions for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Given the uncertainty surrounding the results obtained from low-quality randomized controlled trials, it is currently not feasible to provide recommendations for clinical practice.

背景:选择性腰椎手术越来越多地被用于治疗特殊腰痛患者。然而,大约30%的患者在手术后仍有长期疼痛和残疾。目的:本研究的目的是系统地回顾有关术前康复(prehab)单独或联合常规护理与常规护理在择期腰椎手术后以患者为导向的结果和健康相关费用方面的有效性的文献。数据来源:系统检索了MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE和AMED的电子数据库,检索时间从建站到2022年11月。研究选择:本综述纳入了随机对照试验,这些试验检查了成人(年龄在0 - 18岁)的学前教育项目,并评估了一个或多个感兴趣的结果。数据提取:根据干预描述和复制模板(TIDieR), 6名评论者成对独立进行了偏倚风险评估,并从纳入的研究中提取了结果数据。当试验均质时进行荟萃分析。数据综合:共有8项试验(n = 739名受试者)报道于13份不同的手稿中,符合纳入条件。在3个月的残疾(MD: -2.56, 95% CI: -4.98至-0.15)、6个月的背痛(MD: -6.65, 95% CI: -13.25至-0.05)和健康相关费用(MD: 2572.8欧元,95% CI: 1963.0至3182.5欧元)方面,运动预防干预优于常规护理。CBT预干预似乎优于常规治疗3个月时的背痛(MD: -7.3, 95% CI: -14.5至-0.05)。个别试验表明,在术后1个月,教育干预可能优于常规的背部疼痛(MD: 12.3, 95% CI: 0.9至23.7)。局限性:总的来说,纳入小样本量的异质试验(如诊断、手术类型、剂量、内容和干预持续时间)导致效果估计的不确定性和非常低的确定性。结论:本系统综述显示,缺乏高质量的证据支持对腰椎手术患者进行预先干预。考虑到低质量随机对照试验结果的不确定性,目前为临床实践提供建议是不可行的。
{"title":"Effects of prehabilitation on outcomes following elective lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Lisandra Almeida de Oliveira, Julian Anthony Vitale, Jasmeet Singh Sachdeva, Srikesh Rudrapatna, Sava Ivosevic, Najih Nuradin Ismail, Anthony Cubello, Y V Raghava Neelapala, Nora Bakaa, Diego Roger-Silva, Luciana Macedo","doi":"10.1177/20494637251323175","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637251323175","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elective lumbar spine surgery is increasingly being implemented to treat patients with specific low back pain. However, approximately 30% of patients continue to have long-term pain and disability after surgery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on the effectiveness of pre-surgical rehabilitation (prehab) alone or in combination with usual care versus usual care on patient-oriented outcomes and health-related costs following elective lumbar spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Electronic databases from MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and AMED were systematically searched from their inception to November 2022.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized controlled trials that examined adult (age >18 years) prehab programs and evaluated one or more outcomes of interest were included in this review.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>In pairs, six reviewers independently conducted a risk-of-bias assessment and extracted outcome data from included studies, in accordance with the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR). A meta-analysis was conducted when trials were homogeneous.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>A total of eight trials (<i>n</i> = 739 participants), reported in 13 different manuscripts, were eligible for inclusion. Exercise prehab interventions are superior to usual care for disability at 3-month (MD: -2.56, 95% CI -4.98 to -0.15), back pain at 6-month (MD: -6.65, 95% CI -13.25 to -0.05), and health-related costs (MD: €2572.8, 95% CI: €1963.0 to €3182.5). CBT prehab interventions seem to be superior to usual care for back pain at 3-month (MD: -7.3, 95% CI: -14.5 to -0.05). Individual trials showed that education prehab interventions may be superior to usual for back pain at 1-month post-operative (MD: 12.3, 95% CI: 0.9 to 23.7).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Overall, the inclusion of heterogeneous trials (e.g., diagnosis, types of surgery, dosage, content, and duration of interventions) with small sample sizes leads to inconclusive and very low certainty of effect estimates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present systematic review has brought to light the dearth of high-quality evidence in support of prehab interventions for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Given the uncertainty surrounding the results obtained from low-quality randomized controlled trials, it is currently not feasible to provide recommendations for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637251323175"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11915239/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143665063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
'I want to know that it's worth me attending': A qualitative analysis of consumers' decisions not to attend their chronic pain group education session. “我想知道它是否值得我参加”:对消费者决定不参加慢性疼痛小组教育课程的定性分析。
IF 1.3 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI: 10.1177/20494637251322977
Amelia K Searle, Cindy L Wall, Celia Tan, Peter Herriot

Background: Many pain clinics encourage/mandate attendance at introductory group pain education sessions. Despite high non-attendance rates, no studies have examined consumer-reported reasons for non-attendance. Purpose: The aim of this study was to better understand why consumers fail to attend their pain education session. Research Design and Study Sample: We attempted to contact all non-attendees of our South Australian tertiary pain unit's group pain education sessions from February-August 2020. Of the 23 we could reach, 10 completed semi-structured telephone interviews. Data Analysis: Audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim and subject to thematic content analysis. Results: 'Attendance barriers' themes highlighted the complex lives of non-attendees. Pain prevented them from leaving their house, deterred them from travel to, and sitting through, the entire session. Competing responsibilities including other medical appointments and comorbidities were commonly mentioned. Most explicitly stated their dislike for the group format. Other factors included fear of the unknown nature of the session, not wanting education, and wanting a doctor's appointment. Several participants expressed a distrust of medical professionals, and perceived the benefits of attending as not exceeding the perceived time, money and pain associated. Conclusions: Pain management may not be individuals' main priority and attendance may only occur when other personal issues are addressed. Significant non-attendance rates may be unavoidable. Providing additional session detail may reduce misconceptions and allay concerns. Educating referring GPs may assist consumers to make an informed decision regarding attending. Online sessions may address various barriers and prove a more cost-effective alternative.

Perspective: This article examines consumers' reasons for non-attendance at pre-clinic group education programs. Findings could be used by Pain Units to shape patient and GP communications regarding such programs, as well as program content and format, to improve patient acceptance and program attendance, and potentially engagement with self-management.

背景:许多疼痛诊所鼓励/强制参加介绍性小组疼痛教育会议。尽管缺勤率很高,但没有研究调查消费者报告的缺勤原因。目的:本研究的目的是为了更好地了解为什么消费者不参加他们的疼痛教育会议。研究设计和研究样本:我们试图联系2020年2月至8月期间南澳大利亚三级疼痛单位集体疼痛教育会议的所有非参与者。在我们能联系到的23人中,有10人完成了半结构化的电话采访。资料分析:录音资料逐字抄录,并进行专题内容分析。结果:“出席障碍”的主题突出了非出席者的复杂生活。疼痛使他们无法离开自己的房子,阻止他们去参加整个疗程,也阻止他们坐下来完成整个疗程。包括其他医疗预约和合并症在内的相互竞争的责任被普遍提及。大多数人明确表示不喜欢分组形式。其他因素还包括对治疗的未知性质的恐惧,不想接受教育,以及想要预约医生。一些参与者表示不信任医疗专业人员,认为就诊的好处不会超过所认为的与之相关的时间、金钱和痛苦。结论:疼痛管理可能不是个人的主要优先事项,只有当其他个人问题得到解决时才会出现。显著的缺勤率可能是不可避免的。提供额外的会议细节可以减少误解和减轻关注。教育推荐全科医生可以帮助消费者做出明智的决定是否参加。在线课程可以解决各种障碍,并证明是一种更具成本效益的选择。观点:本文探讨消费者不参加诊所前团体教育计划的原因。研究结果可以被疼痛单位用来塑造患者和全科医生关于这些项目的沟通,以及项目的内容和格式,以提高患者的接受度和项目出勤率,并潜在地参与自我管理。
{"title":"'I want to know that it's worth me attending': A qualitative analysis of consumers' decisions not to attend their chronic pain group education session.","authors":"Amelia K Searle, Cindy L Wall, Celia Tan, Peter Herriot","doi":"10.1177/20494637251322977","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637251322977","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Many pain clinics encourage/mandate attendance at introductory group pain education sessions. Despite high non-attendance rates, no studies have examined consumer-reported reasons for non-attendance. <b>Purpose:</b> The aim of this study was to better understand why consumers fail to attend their pain education session. <b>Research Design and Study Sample:</b> We attempted to contact all non-attendees of our South Australian tertiary pain unit's group pain education sessions from February-August 2020. Of the 23 we could reach, 10 completed semi-structured telephone interviews. <b>Data Analysis:</b> Audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim and subject to thematic content analysis. <b>Results:</b> 'Attendance barriers' themes highlighted the complex lives of non-attendees. Pain prevented them from leaving their house, deterred them from travel to, and sitting through, the entire session. Competing responsibilities including other medical appointments and comorbidities were commonly mentioned. Most explicitly stated their dislike for the group format. Other factors included fear of the unknown nature of the session, not wanting education, and wanting a doctor's appointment. Several participants expressed a distrust of medical professionals, and perceived the benefits of attending as not exceeding the perceived time, money and pain associated. <b>Conclusions:</b> Pain management may not be individuals' main priority and attendance may only occur when other personal issues are addressed. Significant non-attendance rates may be unavoidable. Providing additional session detail may reduce misconceptions and allay concerns. Educating referring GPs may assist consumers to make an informed decision regarding attending. Online sessions may address various barriers and prove a more cost-effective alternative.</p><p><strong>Perspective: </strong>This article examines consumers' reasons for non-attendance at pre-clinic group education programs. Findings could be used by Pain Units to shape patient and GP communications regarding such programs, as well as program content and format, to improve patient acceptance and program attendance, and potentially engagement with self-management.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637251322977"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11851594/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143516749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient experience of discharge opioid analgesia and care provision following spine surgery: A mixed methods study. 脊柱手术后阿片类药物出院镇痛及护理的患者体验:一项混合方法研究。
IF 1.3 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI: 10.1177/20494637251322168
Megan L Allen, Adam Pastor, Kate Leslie, Brennan Fitzpatrick, Malcolm Hogg, Hui Lau, Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis

Background: Perioperative opioid stewardship programs are increasingly being introduced to guide responsible use around the time of surgery to reduce opioid-related harm to patients. However, patient experiences of perioperative opioid stewardship programs are underexplored.

Methods: We designed a mixed methods study to explore patients' experiences of perioperative opioid stewardship in the post-operative period following spine surgery. We performed evaluative action research, combining quality improvement and ethnographic methodologies. Our quantitative methods were retrospective medical record review and targeted survey research. Our qualitative methods were online focus groups. The quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square, and rank sum testing. The focus group data underwent inductive thematic analysis.

Results: Our spine surgery cohort for the four-month study period included 101 patients. The median total discharge opioid dispensed was 75 mg [interquartile range 75-150 mg], with 30% of patients prescribed modified release opioids on discharge. A subset of patients (N = 14) participated in the online focus groups. The key themes that emerged from these sessions were (1) Supportive care delivery and rescue mechanisms were universally important to patient participants, providing great reassurance during their recovery; (2) Participants commonly believed opioid analgesia had an important role in recovery following spine surgery. Some patients were keen to dispose of surplus opioids whilst others intended to retain them; (3) Opioid analgesia access was variable, but established community prescriber relationships were important for post-discharge opioid re-prescription, and (4) The key future improvement suggestions included routine post-discharge contact and enhanced communication options back to the hospital if needed.

Discussion and conclusions: Our mixed methods approach provided rich insights into the pain and opioid analgesia experiences of patients following spine surgery. These insights are useful when seeking to optimise perioperative opioid stewardship programs including better meeting the needs of patient consumers. Limitations included potential response and selection bias for the online focus groups towards younger, higher socioeconomic status patients.

背景:围手术期阿片类药物管理计划越来越多地被引入,以指导手术期间负责任的使用,以减少阿片类药物对患者的伤害。然而,围手术期阿片类药物管理项目的患者经验尚未得到充分探讨。方法:我们设计了一项混合方法研究,探讨脊柱手术后患者围手术期阿片类药物管理的经验。我们进行了评估性行动研究,结合了质量改进和人种学方法。我们的定量方法是回顾性病历回顾和针对性调查研究。我们的定性方法是在线焦点小组。定量资料采用描述性统计、卡方检验和秩和检验进行分析。对焦点小组数据进行归纳性专题分析。结果:我们的脊柱外科队列在四个月的研究期间包括101例患者。出院时分配的阿片类药物中位数为75 mg[四分位数范围为75-150 mg],其中30%的患者在出院时使用改良释放阿片类药物。一部分患者(N = 14)参加了在线焦点小组。从这些会议中出现的关键主题是:(1)支持性护理交付和救援机制对患者参与者普遍重要,在他们康复期间提供极大的保证;(2)参与者普遍认为阿片类镇痛在脊柱手术后恢复中起重要作用。一些患者热衷于处理多余的阿片类药物,而另一些患者则打算保留它们;(3)阿片类镇痛药物的可及性是可变的,但建立社区处方者关系对于出院后阿片类药物的再处方是重要的;(4)未来的关键改进建议包括常规出院后联系和必要时加强与医院的沟通。讨论和结论:我们的混合方法为脊柱手术后患者的疼痛和阿片类镇痛体验提供了丰富的见解。这些见解在寻求优化围手术期阿片类药物管理计划时非常有用,包括更好地满足患者消费者的需求。局限性包括在线焦点小组对年轻、社会经济地位较高的患者的潜在反应和选择偏差。
{"title":"Patient experience of discharge opioid analgesia and care provision following spine surgery: A mixed methods study.","authors":"Megan L Allen, Adam Pastor, Kate Leslie, Brennan Fitzpatrick, Malcolm Hogg, Hui Lau, Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis","doi":"10.1177/20494637251322168","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637251322168","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative opioid stewardship programs are increasingly being introduced to guide responsible use around the time of surgery to reduce opioid-related harm to patients. However, patient experiences of perioperative opioid stewardship programs are underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a mixed methods study to explore patients' experiences of perioperative opioid stewardship in the post-operative period following spine surgery. We performed evaluative action research, combining quality improvement and ethnographic methodologies. Our quantitative methods were retrospective medical record review and targeted survey research. Our qualitative methods were online focus groups. The quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square, and rank sum testing. The focus group data underwent inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our spine surgery cohort for the four-month study period included 101 patients. The median total discharge opioid dispensed was 75 mg [interquartile range 75-150 mg], with 30% of patients prescribed modified release opioids on discharge. A subset of patients (<i>N</i> = 14) participated in the online focus groups. The key themes that emerged from these sessions were (1) Supportive care delivery and rescue mechanisms were universally important to patient participants, providing great reassurance during their recovery; (2) Participants commonly believed opioid analgesia had an important role in recovery following spine surgery. Some patients were keen to dispose of surplus opioids whilst others intended to retain them; (3) Opioid analgesia access was variable, but established community prescriber relationships were important for post-discharge opioid re-prescription, and (4) The key future improvement suggestions included routine post-discharge contact and enhanced communication options back to the hospital if needed.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Our mixed methods approach provided rich insights into the pain and opioid analgesia experiences of patients following spine surgery. These insights are useful when seeking to optimise perioperative opioid stewardship programs including better meeting the needs of patient consumers. Limitations included potential response and selection bias for the online focus groups towards younger, higher socioeconomic status patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637251322168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11840826/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143484246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Veterans in Northern Ireland: Evaluation of chronic pain experience, service type, and physical and mental health functioning. 北爱尔兰的退伍军人:对慢性疼痛经历、服务类型以及身心健康功能的评估。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-11 DOI: 10.1177/20494637241291954
Kevin E Vowles, Martin Robinson, Chérie Armour

Background: Chronic pain is common and associated with disruptions in quality of life (QoL) and psychosocial functioning. These issues are particularly pronounced in veterans, although data in this regard primarily come from the United States Veterans Affairs System, meaning less is known regarding veterans of other countries and regions. The present study evaluated veterans living in Northern Ireland (NI), a region with historic high rates of both chronic pain and psychosocial difficulties associated with the decades-long period of civil and military conflict preceding the 1999 armistice (the Good Friday Agreement). Unique to the Northern Ireland military operation was the initiation of Home Service battalions comprised of local recruits, a role with increased risk due to the conflict's nature and the fact that they were serving as a military and security presence in their home region.

Methods: A cross-sectional assessment of veterans living in Northern Ireland (N = 722) provided details of service type (Home Service vs other service), current health conditions (including chronic pain), and current psychosocial functioning (including physical and mental health QoL, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD] symptoms).

Results: Findings indicated that those with chronic pain had worse QoL, anxiety, depression, and PTSD. Those with chronic pain were also more likely to have served in the Home Services, be unemployed, and be receiving disability payment. Contrary to hypotheses, there was no interaction between chronic pain and service type.

Conclusions: These results extend previous work with veterans to the unique circumstances of a post-conflict military that engaged in operations within its own country and underscore the need for coordinated, efficacious interventions for co-morbid chronic pain and anxiety, depression, and PTSD.

背景:慢性疼痛是一种常见病,与生活质量(QoL)和社会心理功能紊乱有关。这些问题在退伍军人中尤为突出,尽管这方面的数据主要来自美国退伍军人事务系统,这意味着对其他国家和地区退伍军人的了解较少。本研究对生活在北爱尔兰(NI)的退伍军人进行了评估,该地区在 1999 年停战(《耶稣受难日协议》)之前长达数十年的内战和军事冲突期间,慢性疼痛和社会心理障碍的发病率一直居高不下。北爱尔兰军事行动的独特之处在于启动了由当地新兵组成的家庭服务营,由于冲突的性质以及他们在家乡地区充当军事和安全存在的事实,这种角色的风险增加了:对居住在北爱尔兰的退伍军人(N = 722)进行了横断面评估,详细了解了他们的服役类型(本土服役与其他服役)、当前健康状况(包括慢性疼痛)和当前社会心理功能(包括身体和心理健康的 QoL、焦虑、抑郁和创伤后应激障碍 [PTSD] 症状):结果:研究结果表明,慢性疼痛患者的 QoL、焦虑、抑郁和创伤后应激障碍症状较差。慢性疼痛患者也更有可能曾在家庭服务机构服役、失业和领取残疾津贴。与假设相反,慢性疼痛与服役类型之间没有交互作用:这些结果将以前针对退伍军人的研究扩展到了冲突后军队在本国境内参与行动的独特环境中,并强调了对同时患有慢性疼痛和焦虑、抑郁及创伤后应激障碍的人进行协调、有效干预的必要性。
{"title":"Veterans in Northern Ireland: Evaluation of chronic pain experience, service type, and physical and mental health functioning.","authors":"Kevin E Vowles, Martin Robinson, Chérie Armour","doi":"10.1177/20494637241291954","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637241291954","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pain is common and associated with disruptions in quality of life (QoL) and psychosocial functioning. These issues are particularly pronounced in veterans, although data in this regard primarily come from the United States Veterans Affairs System, meaning less is known regarding veterans of other countries and regions. The present study evaluated veterans living in Northern Ireland (NI), a region with historic high rates of both chronic pain and psychosocial difficulties associated with the decades-long period of civil and military conflict preceding the 1999 armistice (the Good Friday Agreement). Unique to the Northern Ireland military operation was the initiation of Home Service battalions comprised of local recruits, a role with increased risk due to the conflict's nature and the fact that they were serving as a military and security presence in their home region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional assessment of veterans living in Northern Ireland (<i>N</i> = 722) provided details of service type (Home Service vs other service), current health conditions (including chronic pain), and current psychosocial functioning (including physical and mental health QoL, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD] symptoms).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicated that those with chronic pain had worse QoL, anxiety, depression, and PTSD. Those with chronic pain were also more likely to have served in the Home Services, be unemployed, and be receiving disability payment. Contrary to hypotheses, there was no interaction between chronic pain and service type.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results extend previous work with veterans to the unique circumstances of a post-conflict military that engaged in operations within its own country and underscore the need for coordinated, efficacious interventions for co-morbid chronic pain and anxiety, depression, and PTSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"6-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559513/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142629861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
British Journal of Pain
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1