Pub Date : 2025-02-19DOI: 10.1177/20494637251322168
Megan L Allen, Adam Pastor, Kate Leslie, Brennan Fitzpatrick, Malcolm Hogg, Hui Lau, Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis
Background: Perioperative opioid stewardship programs are increasingly being introduced to guide responsible use around the time of surgery to reduce opioid-related harm to patients. However, patient experiences of perioperative opioid stewardship programs are underexplored.
Methods: We designed a mixed methods study to explore patients' experiences of perioperative opioid stewardship in the post-operative period following spine surgery. We performed evaluative action research, combining quality improvement and ethnographic methodologies. Our quantitative methods were retrospective medical record review and targeted survey research. Our qualitative methods were online focus groups. The quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square, and rank sum testing. The focus group data underwent inductive thematic analysis.
Results: Our spine surgery cohort for the four-month study period included 101 patients. The median total discharge opioid dispensed was 75 mg [interquartile range 75-150 mg], with 30% of patients prescribed modified release opioids on discharge. A subset of patients (N = 14) participated in the online focus groups. The key themes that emerged from these sessions were (1) Supportive care delivery and rescue mechanisms were universally important to patient participants, providing great reassurance during their recovery; (2) Participants commonly believed opioid analgesia had an important role in recovery following spine surgery. Some patients were keen to dispose of surplus opioids whilst others intended to retain them; (3) Opioid analgesia access was variable, but established community prescriber relationships were important for post-discharge opioid re-prescription, and (4) The key future improvement suggestions included routine post-discharge contact and enhanced communication options back to the hospital if needed.
Discussion and conclusions: Our mixed methods approach provided rich insights into the pain and opioid analgesia experiences of patients following spine surgery. These insights are useful when seeking to optimise perioperative opioid stewardship programs including better meeting the needs of patient consumers. Limitations included potential response and selection bias for the online focus groups towards younger, higher socioeconomic status patients.
{"title":"Patient experience of discharge opioid analgesia and care provision following spine surgery: A mixed methods study.","authors":"Megan L Allen, Adam Pastor, Kate Leslie, Brennan Fitzpatrick, Malcolm Hogg, Hui Lau, Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis","doi":"10.1177/20494637251322168","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637251322168","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative opioid stewardship programs are increasingly being introduced to guide responsible use around the time of surgery to reduce opioid-related harm to patients. However, patient experiences of perioperative opioid stewardship programs are underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a mixed methods study to explore patients' experiences of perioperative opioid stewardship in the post-operative period following spine surgery. We performed evaluative action research, combining quality improvement and ethnographic methodologies. Our quantitative methods were retrospective medical record review and targeted survey research. Our qualitative methods were online focus groups. The quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square, and rank sum testing. The focus group data underwent inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our spine surgery cohort for the four-month study period included 101 patients. The median total discharge opioid dispensed was 75 mg [interquartile range 75-150 mg], with 30% of patients prescribed modified release opioids on discharge. A subset of patients (<i>N</i> = 14) participated in the online focus groups. The key themes that emerged from these sessions were (1) Supportive care delivery and rescue mechanisms were universally important to patient participants, providing great reassurance during their recovery; (2) Participants commonly believed opioid analgesia had an important role in recovery following spine surgery. Some patients were keen to dispose of surplus opioids whilst others intended to retain them; (3) Opioid analgesia access was variable, but established community prescriber relationships were important for post-discharge opioid re-prescription, and (4) The key future improvement suggestions included routine post-discharge contact and enhanced communication options back to the hospital if needed.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Our mixed methods approach provided rich insights into the pain and opioid analgesia experiences of patients following spine surgery. These insights are useful when seeking to optimise perioperative opioid stewardship programs including better meeting the needs of patient consumers. Limitations included potential response and selection bias for the online focus groups towards younger, higher socioeconomic status patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637251322168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11840826/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143484246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-11DOI: 10.1177/20494637251319497
Nicolas G Glynos, Anne Baker, Jacob S Aday, Daniel Kruger, Kevin F Boehnke, Stephanie Lake, Philippe Lucas
Psychedelic substances have shown preliminary efficacy for several neuropsychiatric disorders and are currently being investigated for chronic pain conditions. However, few studies have investigated outcomes of naturalistic psychedelic use among individuals with chronic pain, and none have assessed psychedelic-related changes in substance use patterns in this population. In a cross-sectional survey of adults who reported using psychedelics to self-treat a chronic pain condition (n = 466; 46.1% women), we investigated changed substance use patterns and self-reported outcomes on physical and mental health following use of a psychedelic. Most (86.3%; n = 391/453) indicated that they ceased or decreased use of one or more non-psychedelic substances "as a result of" psychedelic use, and 21.2% (n = 83/391) indicated that the decrease in use persisted for more than 26 weeks after psychedelic use. Alcohol (71.1%; n = 226/318) and prescription opioids (64.1%; n = 100/156) had the highest proportions for ceased/decreased use. Illicit opioids (27.8%; n = 22/79) and cannabis (21.5%; n = 78/362) had the highest proportions for increased/initiated use. In multivariate regression modeling, having a motivation to reduce one's substance use was positively associated with ceasing/decreasing substance use (p < .001). Perceptions of health outcomes following psychedelic use were broadly positive, and psilocybin was reported to be the most effective substance for both physical and mental health symptoms. Although limited by a cross-sectional study design, findings from this large sample merit future investigation into the benefits and risks of naturalistic psychedelic use among individuals with chronic pain.
{"title":"Psychedelics and chronic pain: self-reported outcomes on changed substance use patterns and health following naturalistic psychedelic use.","authors":"Nicolas G Glynos, Anne Baker, Jacob S Aday, Daniel Kruger, Kevin F Boehnke, Stephanie Lake, Philippe Lucas","doi":"10.1177/20494637251319497","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637251319497","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychedelic substances have shown preliminary efficacy for several neuropsychiatric disorders and are currently being investigated for chronic pain conditions. However, few studies have investigated outcomes of naturalistic psychedelic use among individuals with chronic pain, and none have assessed psychedelic-related changes in substance use patterns in this population. In a cross-sectional survey of adults who reported using psychedelics to self-treat a chronic pain condition (<i>n</i> = 466; 46.1% women), we investigated changed substance use patterns and self-reported outcomes on physical and mental health following use of a psychedelic. Most (86.3%; <i>n</i> = 391/453) indicated that they ceased or decreased use of one or more non-psychedelic substances \"as a result of\" psychedelic use, and 21.2% (<i>n</i> = 83/391) indicated that the decrease in use persisted for more than 26 weeks after psychedelic use. Alcohol (71.1%; <i>n</i> = 226/318) and prescription opioids (64.1%; <i>n</i> = 100/156) had the highest proportions for ceased/decreased use. Illicit opioids (27.8%; <i>n</i> = 22/79) and cannabis (21.5%; <i>n</i> = 78/362) had the highest proportions for increased/initiated use. In multivariate regression modeling, having a motivation to reduce one's substance use was positively associated with ceasing/decreasing substance use (<i>p</i> < .001). Perceptions of health outcomes following psychedelic use were broadly positive, and psilocybin was reported to be the most effective substance for both physical and mental health symptoms. Although limited by a cross-sectional study design, findings from this large sample merit future investigation into the benefits and risks of naturalistic psychedelic use among individuals with chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637251319497"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811946/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143410728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-10-11DOI: 10.1177/20494637241291954
Kevin E Vowles, Martin Robinson, Chérie Armour
Background: Chronic pain is common and associated with disruptions in quality of life (QoL) and psychosocial functioning. These issues are particularly pronounced in veterans, although data in this regard primarily come from the United States Veterans Affairs System, meaning less is known regarding veterans of other countries and regions. The present study evaluated veterans living in Northern Ireland (NI), a region with historic high rates of both chronic pain and psychosocial difficulties associated with the decades-long period of civil and military conflict preceding the 1999 armistice (the Good Friday Agreement). Unique to the Northern Ireland military operation was the initiation of Home Service battalions comprised of local recruits, a role with increased risk due to the conflict's nature and the fact that they were serving as a military and security presence in their home region.
Methods: A cross-sectional assessment of veterans living in Northern Ireland (N = 722) provided details of service type (Home Service vs other service), current health conditions (including chronic pain), and current psychosocial functioning (including physical and mental health QoL, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD] symptoms).
Results: Findings indicated that those with chronic pain had worse QoL, anxiety, depression, and PTSD. Those with chronic pain were also more likely to have served in the Home Services, be unemployed, and be receiving disability payment. Contrary to hypotheses, there was no interaction between chronic pain and service type.
Conclusions: These results extend previous work with veterans to the unique circumstances of a post-conflict military that engaged in operations within its own country and underscore the need for coordinated, efficacious interventions for co-morbid chronic pain and anxiety, depression, and PTSD.
{"title":"Veterans in Northern Ireland: Evaluation of chronic pain experience, service type, and physical and mental health functioning.","authors":"Kevin E Vowles, Martin Robinson, Chérie Armour","doi":"10.1177/20494637241291954","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637241291954","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pain is common and associated with disruptions in quality of life (QoL) and psychosocial functioning. These issues are particularly pronounced in veterans, although data in this regard primarily come from the United States Veterans Affairs System, meaning less is known regarding veterans of other countries and regions. The present study evaluated veterans living in Northern Ireland (NI), a region with historic high rates of both chronic pain and psychosocial difficulties associated with the decades-long period of civil and military conflict preceding the 1999 armistice (the Good Friday Agreement). Unique to the Northern Ireland military operation was the initiation of Home Service battalions comprised of local recruits, a role with increased risk due to the conflict's nature and the fact that they were serving as a military and security presence in their home region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional assessment of veterans living in Northern Ireland (<i>N</i> = 722) provided details of service type (Home Service vs other service), current health conditions (including chronic pain), and current psychosocial functioning (including physical and mental health QoL, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD] symptoms).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicated that those with chronic pain had worse QoL, anxiety, depression, and PTSD. Those with chronic pain were also more likely to have served in the Home Services, be unemployed, and be receiving disability payment. Contrary to hypotheses, there was no interaction between chronic pain and service type.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results extend previous work with veterans to the unique circumstances of a post-conflict military that engaged in operations within its own country and underscore the need for coordinated, efficacious interventions for co-morbid chronic pain and anxiety, depression, and PTSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"6-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559513/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142629861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-10-04DOI: 10.1177/20494637241276104
R Waller, E Brown, J Lim, R Nadarajah, E Reardon, A Mikhailov, L Straker, D Beales
Background: More sex-specific pain sensitivity normative values from population-based cohorts in pain-free older adults are required. The aims of this study were (1) to provide sex- and age-specific normative values of pressure and cold pain thresholds in older pain-free adults and (2) to examine the association of potential correlates of pain sensitivity with pain threshold values.
Methods: This study investigated sex-specific pressure (lumbar spine, tibialis anterior, neck and dorsal wrist) and cold (dorsal wrist) pain threshold estimates for older pain-free adults aged 41-70 years. This cross-sectional study used participants (n = 212) from the Raine Study Gen1-26 year follow-up. The association of pain thresholds, with correlates including sex, test site, ethnicity, waist-hip ratio, smoking status, health-related quality of life, depression, anxiety and stress symptoms, sleep quality, socioeconomic status and physical activity levels, was examined.
Results: Values for pressure and cold pain thresholds for older pain-free adults are provided, grouped by vicennium, sex and test site (pressure). Statistically significant independent correlates of increased pressure pain sensitivity were test site, ethnicity and sex. Only lower waist/hip ratio was a statistically significant, independent correlate of increased cold pain sensitivity.
Conclusions: This study provides robust sex- and age-specific normative values for pressure pain threshold and cold pain threshold for an older adult pain-free population. Combined with existing values, these data provide an important resource in assisting interpretation of pain sensitivity in clinical pain disorders and provide insights into the complex association of pain sensitivity with correlates that can be used in research.
{"title":"Pressure and cold pain threshold reference values in a pain-free older adult population.","authors":"R Waller, E Brown, J Lim, R Nadarajah, E Reardon, A Mikhailov, L Straker, D Beales","doi":"10.1177/20494637241276104","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637241276104","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More sex-specific pain sensitivity normative values from population-based cohorts in pain-free older adults are required. The aims of this study were (1) to provide sex- and age-specific normative values of pressure and cold pain thresholds in older pain-free adults and (2) to examine the association of potential correlates of pain sensitivity with pain threshold values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study investigated sex-specific pressure (lumbar spine, tibialis anterior, neck and dorsal wrist) and cold (dorsal wrist) pain threshold estimates for older pain-free adults aged 41-70 years. This cross-sectional study used participants (<i>n</i> = 212) from the Raine Study Gen1-26 year follow-up. The association of pain thresholds, with correlates including sex, test site, ethnicity, waist-hip ratio, smoking status, health-related quality of life, depression, anxiety and stress symptoms, sleep quality, socioeconomic status and physical activity levels, was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Values for pressure and cold pain thresholds for older pain-free adults are provided, grouped by vicennium, sex and test site (pressure). Statistically significant independent correlates of increased pressure pain sensitivity were test site, ethnicity and sex. Only lower waist/hip ratio was a statistically significant, independent correlate of increased cold pain sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides robust sex- and age-specific normative values for pressure pain threshold and cold pain threshold for an older adult pain-free population. Combined with existing values, these data provide an important resource in assisting interpretation of pain sensitivity in clinical pain disorders and provide insights into the complex association of pain sensitivity with correlates that can be used in research.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"15-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559510/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142629818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Some patients with postoperative hip fractures (HF) experience persistent severe pain. In this longitudinal study, we examined the characteristics of patients with persistent pain after HF surgery, and the factors influencing pain intensity.
Methods: We conducted an 8-week prospective study in patients with postsurgical HF. Verbal rating scale (VRS), and multifaceted outcomes, including pressure pain threshold (PPT) (affected site and biceps), were evaluated at 2, 4, and 8 weeks postoperatively. Patients were divided into mild (VRS ≤1) and severe (VRS ≥2) groups according to pain intensity at 8 weeks postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA and decision-tree analysis.
Results: VRS, PPT at the affected site and biceps, and physical activity (PA) time were significantly lower in the severe group than in the mild group 2 weeks postoperatively. VRS, PPT at the affected site, pain catastrophizing (PCS)-13, and the Tampa Scale for Kineshiophobia (TSK)-11 did not show significant improvements in the severe group. Decision tree analysis revealed that the VRS and PCS-13 at 4 weeks, PA time at 2 weeks, and TSK-11 change between 4 weeks and 2 weeks were factors influencing severe pain intensity at 8 weeks after HF surgery.
Conclusion: Persistent severe pain after HF surgery was characterised by high peripheral and central sensitisation, pain catastrophizing, and reduced PA at 2 weeks after HF surgery. In addition, early pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, and PA may be hierarchically influential factors for persistent pain 8 weeks after HF surgery.
{"title":"Persistent postsurgical pain in hip fracture patients. A prospective longitudinal study with multifaceted assessment.","authors":"Yutaro Nomoto, Yuki Nishi, Koichi Nakagawa, Kyo Goto, Yutaro Kondo, Junichiro Yamashita, Kaoru Morita, Hideki Kataoka, Junya Sakamoto, Minoru Okita","doi":"10.1177/20494637241300385","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637241300385","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some patients with postoperative hip fractures (HF) experience persistent severe pain. In this longitudinal study, we examined the characteristics of patients with persistent pain after HF surgery, and the factors influencing pain intensity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an 8-week prospective study in patients with postsurgical HF. Verbal rating scale (VRS), and multifaceted outcomes, including pressure pain threshold (PPT) (affected site and biceps), were evaluated at 2, 4, and 8 weeks postoperatively. Patients were divided into mild (VRS ≤1) and severe (VRS ≥2) groups according to pain intensity at 8 weeks postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA and decision-tree analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VRS, PPT at the affected site and biceps, and physical activity (PA) time were significantly lower in the severe group than in the mild group 2 weeks postoperatively. VRS, PPT at the affected site, pain catastrophizing (PCS)-13, and the Tampa Scale for Kineshiophobia (TSK)-11 did not show significant improvements in the severe group. Decision tree analysis revealed that the VRS and PCS-13 at 4 weeks, PA time at 2 weeks, and TSK-11 change between 4 weeks and 2 weeks were factors influencing severe pain intensity at 8 weeks after HF surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Persistent severe pain after HF surgery was characterised by high peripheral and central sensitisation, pain catastrophizing, and reduced PA at 2 weeks after HF surgery. In addition, early pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, and PA may be hierarchically influential factors for persistent pain 8 weeks after HF surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"51-61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559712/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142629813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-10-20DOI: 10.1177/20494637241291534
Lucy Johnson, Frances Cole, Rebecca Kinchin, Andrea Francis, Konrad Winiarek, Kate Hampshire, Paul Chazot
Objective: To assess the feasibility and possible impacts of implementation of systematic non-pharmacological interventions to reduce the level of prescribing of opioid and gabapentinoid analgesics for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP), particularly high-dose prescriptions, through a proof-of-concept study in a deprived area (second lowest decile) primary care practice in North-East England.
Participant: Twenty-five primary care staff (clinical and non-clinical) of which 18 clinicians received the intervention.
Intervention used in this study practice known as gott gabapentinoid and opioid toolkit: All clinicians received an educational skills programme to support patient pain self-management, tailored on the clinicians' self-assessment of their learning needs, embedding both clinician skill learning and patient self-care resources for rapid access within consultations into a GP clinical management computer system.
Outcome measures: Clinical staff completed questionnaires before and after the GOTT intervention to assess levels of knowledge and confidence in their own skills to support chronic pain self-management across several domains. Prescription data were used to measure changes in opioid and gabapentinoid prescribing at the practice across the 12-month intervention and 30-month follow-up period.
Results: Prescribing of opioid and gabapentinoid/pregabalin decreased substantially in the practice across the intervention period (c. 90% in high-dose opioid [p = .0118], and 15% gabapentin/pregabalin prescriptions, respectively), over a one-year period during the COVID-19 pandemic. Follow-up analysis showed 100% and c.50% reductions, respectively, in December 2022. The questionnaire data showed an increase in clinician confidence in skills to enable self-management over the intervention period, overall (p = .044) and, specifically across three of the five domains measured: supporting behavioural change (p = .028), supporting self-care (p = .008), and managing difficult consultations (p = .011).
Conclusion: The GOTT intervention program provided some initial evidence of a proof-of-concept for the implementation of a systematic non-pharmacological pain management skills and resources programme addressing lack of confidence in skills to introduce and support self-management and reduce use of strong opioids and gabapentinoids.
{"title":"Assessing the feasibility of the GOTT (Gabapentinoid and Opioid Tapering Toolkit) in a primary care setting in North-East England.","authors":"Lucy Johnson, Frances Cole, Rebecca Kinchin, Andrea Francis, Konrad Winiarek, Kate Hampshire, Paul Chazot","doi":"10.1177/20494637241291534","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637241291534","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility and possible impacts of implementation of systematic non-pharmacological interventions to reduce the level of prescribing of opioid and gabapentinoid analgesics for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP), particularly high-dose prescriptions, through a proof-of-concept study in a deprived area (second lowest decile) primary care practice in North-East England.</p><p><strong>Participant: </strong>Twenty-five primary care staff (clinical and non-clinical) of which 18 clinicians received the intervention.</p><p><strong>Intervention used in this study practice known as gott gabapentinoid and opioid toolkit: </strong>All clinicians received an educational skills programme to support patient pain self-management, tailored on the clinicians' self-assessment of their learning needs, embedding both clinician skill learning and patient self-care resources for rapid access within consultations into a GP clinical management computer system.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Clinical staff completed questionnaires before and after the GOTT intervention to assess levels of knowledge and confidence in their own skills to support chronic pain self-management across several domains. Prescription data were used to measure changes in opioid and gabapentinoid prescribing at the practice across the 12-month intervention and 30-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prescribing of opioid and gabapentinoid/pregabalin decreased substantially in the practice across the intervention period (c. 90% in high-dose opioid [<i>p</i> = .0118], and 15% gabapentin/pregabalin prescriptions, respectively), over a one-year period during the COVID-19 pandemic. Follow-up analysis showed 100% and c.50% reductions, respectively, in December 2022. The questionnaire data showed an increase in clinician confidence in skills to enable self-management over the intervention period, overall (<i>p</i> = .044) and, specifically across three of the five domains measured: supporting behavioural change (<i>p</i> = .028), supporting self-care (<i>p</i> = .008), and managing difficult consultations (<i>p</i> = .011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The GOTT intervention program provided some initial evidence of a proof-of-concept for the implementation of a systematic non-pharmacological pain management skills and resources programme addressing lack of confidence in skills to introduce and support self-management and reduce use of strong opioids and gabapentinoids.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"29-42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559511/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142629722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-11-04DOI: 10.1177/20494637241298246
Nguyen Xuan Thanh, Breda Eubank, Arianna Waye, Jason Werle, Richard Walker, David A Hart, David M Sheps, Geoff Schneider, Tim Takahashi, Tracy Wasylak, Mel Slomp
Objectives: To 1) estimate the utilization and costs of physician and diagnostic imaging (DI) services for shoulder, knee, and low-back pain (LBP) conditions; and 2) examine determinants of the utilization and costs of these services.
Methods: All patients visiting a physician for shoulder, knee, or LBP conditions (identified by the ICD-9 codes) in Alberta, Canada, in fiscal year (FY) 2022/2023 were included. Interested outcomes included numbers and costs of physician visits and DI exams stratified by condition, physician specialty, DI modality, and patients' sex and age. Multivariate regressions were used to examine determinants of the outcomes.
Results: In FY 2022/2023, 10.4%, 7.0%, and 6.7% of the population saw physicians for shoulder, knee, and LBP conditions, respectively. This costs Alberta $307.04 million ($67.93 per capita), of which shoulder accounted for 41%, knee 28%, and LBP 31%. In the same FY, 17,734 computed tomography (CT), 43,939 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 686 ultrasound (US), and 170,936 X-ray exams related to shoulder/knee/LBP conditions were ordered for these patients, costing another $29.07 million, of which CT accounted for 14%, MRI 48%, US 0%, and X-ray 37%. Female, older age, comorbidity scores, and capital zone used physician services more frequently. Patients with a higher comorbidity index scores or more physician visits were more likely being referred for CT or MRI.
Conclusion: Musculoskeletal conditions are common and result in patients seeking healthcare services. Visits to family physicians, specialists, and the ordering of DI contribute to extensive utilization of health services, contributing to considerable health system costs.
{"title":"Costs of physician and diagnostic imaging services for shoulder, knee, and low back pain conditions: A population-based study in Alberta, Canada.","authors":"Nguyen Xuan Thanh, Breda Eubank, Arianna Waye, Jason Werle, Richard Walker, David A Hart, David M Sheps, Geoff Schneider, Tim Takahashi, Tracy Wasylak, Mel Slomp","doi":"10.1177/20494637241298246","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637241298246","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To 1) estimate the utilization and costs of physician and diagnostic imaging (DI) services for shoulder, knee, and low-back pain (LBP) conditions; and 2) examine determinants of the utilization and costs of these services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients visiting a physician for shoulder, knee, or LBP conditions (identified by the ICD-9 codes) in Alberta, Canada, in fiscal year (FY) 2022/2023 were included. Interested outcomes included numbers and costs of physician visits and DI exams stratified by condition, physician specialty, DI modality, and patients' sex and age. Multivariate regressions were used to examine determinants of the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In FY 2022/2023, 10.4%, 7.0%, and 6.7% of the population saw physicians for shoulder, knee, and LBP conditions, respectively. This costs Alberta $307.04 million ($67.93 per capita), of which shoulder accounted for 41%, knee 28%, and LBP 31%. In the same FY, 17,734 computed tomography (CT), 43,939 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 686 ultrasound (US), and 170,936 X-ray exams related to shoulder/knee/LBP conditions were ordered for these patients, costing another $29.07 million, of which CT accounted for 14%, MRI 48%, US 0%, and X-ray 37%. Female, older age, comorbidity scores, and capital zone used physician services more frequently. Patients with a higher comorbidity index scores or more physician visits were more likely being referred for CT or MRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Musculoskeletal conditions are common and result in patients seeking healthcare services. Visits to family physicians, specialists, and the ordering of DI contribute to extensive utilization of health services, contributing to considerable health system costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"43-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559509/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142629660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2025-02-06DOI: 10.1177/20494637251313896
Jan Vollert, Nadia Soliman
{"title":"Chronic pain as a long-term burden for veterans.","authors":"Jan Vollert, Nadia Soliman","doi":"10.1177/20494637251313896","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637251313896","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":"19 1","pages":"4-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11803606/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143383736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-21DOI: 10.1177/20494637241312064
Gerlinde Pilkington, Mark I Johnson, Kate Thompson
Introduction: Social prescribing links patients to community groups and services to meet health needs; however, it is uncertain what the benefits and impacts of social prescribing are for people with chronic pain. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) undertook a systematic review to investigate the clinical and cost effectiveness of social interventions aimed at improving the quality of life of people with chronic pain; no relevant clinical studies comparing social interventions with standard care for chronic pain were found, though the inclusion criteria for studies was narrow.
Objectives: To undertake a rapid review of all types of research and policy on social prescribing for adults with chronic pain in the U.K. (i) to describe the characteristics of relevant research and (ii) to synthesise data on impact.
Methods: A two-stage rapid review was planned. Stage (i) scoped and categorised knowledge from a comprehensive representation of the literature. In stage (ii), we undertook a descriptive synthesis of quantitative data along with a thematic analysis of qualitative data identified by stage (i).
Results: Of 40 full-text records assessed for inclusion, three met the inclusion criteria from academic databases. An additional five records were found in grey literature. Six records reported quantitative findings suggesting that social prescribing reduced pain severity and discomfort, pain medication and clinical appointments; and improved quality of life and ability to manage health. Five records captured qualitative data from interviews, case studies and anecdotal quotes that suggested positive impact on health and wellbeing; and increased self-efficacy in social prescribers undertaking training on pain.
Conclusions: There is tentative evidence that social prescribing improves health and wellbeing outcomes in adults with chronic pain and that there is a need to upskill social prescribers in contemporary pain science education. Research on the routes to referral, outcomes and impacts is needed.
Perspective: Social prescribing is valued and may be of benefit for people with chronic pain. There is a need to further develop and evaluate social prescribing services for people with chronic pain to enhance holistic patient centered care.
{"title":"Social prescribing for adults with chronic pain in the U.K.: a rapid review.","authors":"Gerlinde Pilkington, Mark I Johnson, Kate Thompson","doi":"10.1177/20494637241312064","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637241312064","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Social prescribing links patients to community groups and services to meet health needs; however, it is uncertain what the benefits and impacts of social prescribing are for people with chronic pain. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) undertook a systematic review to investigate the clinical and cost effectiveness of social interventions aimed at improving the quality of life of people with chronic pain; no relevant clinical studies comparing social interventions with standard care for chronic pain were found, though the inclusion criteria for studies was narrow.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To undertake a rapid review of all types of research and policy on social prescribing for adults with chronic pain in the U.K. (i) to describe the characteristics of relevant research and (ii) to synthesise data on impact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-stage rapid review was planned. Stage (i) scoped and categorised knowledge from a comprehensive representation of the literature. In stage (ii), we undertook a descriptive synthesis of quantitative data along with a thematic analysis of qualitative data identified by stage (i).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 40 full-text records assessed for inclusion, three met the inclusion criteria from academic databases. An additional five records were found in grey literature. Six records reported quantitative findings suggesting that social prescribing reduced pain severity and discomfort, pain medication and clinical appointments; and improved quality of life and ability to manage health. Five records captured qualitative data from interviews, case studies and anecdotal quotes that suggested positive impact on health and wellbeing; and increased self-efficacy in social prescribers undertaking training on pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is tentative evidence that social prescribing improves health and wellbeing outcomes in adults with chronic pain and that there is a need to upskill social prescribers in contemporary pain science education. Research on the routes to referral, outcomes and impacts is needed.</p><p><strong>Perspective: </strong>Social prescribing is valued and may be of benefit for people with chronic pain. There is a need to further develop and evaluate social prescribing services for people with chronic pain to enhance holistic patient centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637241312064"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752153/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143029924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Although spinal cord stimulator (SCS) therapy is generally used safely to treat chronic neuropathic pain conditions, this document highlights the less reported complication of unusual neurological problems including headaches. These developed temporally after the initiation of SCS therapy despite initial positive response to pain. The mechanisms might include activation of trigeminal receptors and neuroplasticity after SCS. We present a series of four cases where patients developed new neurological symptoms like headaches, facial twitching, and tinnitus, that were related to SCS activation. Despite adjustments to the SCS settings and extensive evaluations, these symptoms persisted in all cases, leading to the decision to explant SCS which was otherwise helping pain.
{"title":"A case series of new-onset headache and neurological issues after thoracolumbar spinal cord stimulators.","authors":"Ramkumar Kalaiyarasan, Hemkumar Pushparaj, Manohar Sharma","doi":"10.1177/20494637241310705","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637241310705","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although spinal cord stimulator (SCS) therapy is generally used safely to treat chronic neuropathic pain conditions, this document highlights the less reported complication of unusual neurological problems including headaches. These developed temporally after the initiation of SCS therapy despite initial positive response to pain. The mechanisms might include activation of trigeminal receptors and neuroplasticity after SCS. We present a series of four cases where patients developed new neurological symptoms like headaches, facial twitching, and tinnitus, that were related to SCS activation. Despite adjustments to the SCS settings and extensive evaluations, these symptoms persisted in all cases, leading to the decision to explant SCS which was otherwise helping pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"296-299"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11701894/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}