Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.21146/0042-8744-2023-8-15-25
Abdusalam A. Guseinov
The article was written in response and gratutude to Chinese Professor Ma Yinmao in connection with his article ‘On the Academician Abdusalam A. Guseynov’s “negative ethics” and its borders’. It consists of three parts. In the first part, the author examines the question of why negative ethics is at the same time the beginning of a positive moral program of human activity. Proceeding from the belief that philosophy is an ethical project and an act is its first principle, he shows that the path of man as a living rational individual to being lies through denial. The act is deployed in two opposite directions: as a fact, it goes into the individual and is in the zone of his exclusive responsibility, and by its content it is included in the social being, its rationally organized cultural space. The contradictory integrity of the act is considered in the context of the concept of non-alibi in being introduced by M.M. Bakhtin. The second part is devoted to two main arguments against an expansive understanding of negative ethics. The first is that it does not take into account the existence of people with pure moral intentions. According to the second, the positive normative content of public morality falls out of the field of negative ethics. The third part discusses the moral paradoxes that the consciousness of one’s own moral imperfection is an indicator of one’s perfection and that good deeds should be done in secret.
这篇文章是为了回应和感谢中国教授马银茂的文章《论Abdusalam A. guu - seynov院士的“消极伦理”及其边界》。它由三部分组成。在第一部分中，作者考察了为什么消极伦理同时是人类活动的积极道德计划的开端。从哲学是一项伦理工程，行为是其首要原则的信念出发，他表明，作为一个活生生的理性个体，人通往存在的道路在于否认。行为在两个相反的方向上展开:作为一个事实，它进入个人并处于他的专属责任范围内，而通过其内容，它被包括在社会存在及其合理组织的文化空间中。在巴赫金提出的“非伊比”概念的背景下，考虑了行为的矛盾完整性。第二部分致力于反对对消极伦理的广泛理解的两个主要论点。首先，它没有考虑到有纯粹道德意图的人的存在。第二种观点认为，公共道德的积极规范内容脱离了消极伦理领域。第三部分讨论了道德悖论，即意识到自己的道德缺陷是一个人完美的标志，做好事应该在秘密中完成。
{"title":"On the Positive Meaning of Negative Ethics (In Response and Gratitude to Professor Ma Yinmao)","authors":"Abdusalam A. Guseinov","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2023-8-15-25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-8-15-25","url":null,"abstract":"The article was written in response and gratutude to Chinese Professor Ma Yinmao in connection with his article ‘On the Academician Abdusalam A. Guseynov’s “negative ethics” and its borders’. It consists of three parts. In the first part, the author examines the question of why negative ethics is at the same time the beginning of a positive moral program of human activity. Proceeding from the belief that philosophy is an ethical project and an act is its first principle, he shows that the path of man as a living rational individual to being lies through denial. The act is deployed in two opposite directions: as a fact, it goes into the individual and is in the zone of his exclusive responsibility, and by its content it is included in the social being, its rationally organized cultural space. The contradictory integrity of the act is considered in the context of the concept of non-alibi in being introduced by M.M. Bakhtin. The second part is devoted to two main arguments against an expansive understanding of negative ethics. The first is that it does not take into account the existence of people with pure moral intentions. According to the second, the positive normative content of public morality falls out of the field of negative ethics. The third part discusses the moral paradoxes that the consciousness of one’s own moral imperfection is an indicator of one’s perfection and that good deeds should be done in secret.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134887653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.21146/0042-8744-2023-9-191-201
Vladislav S. Razdyakonov
The last third of the 19th century saw a widespread dissemination of Indian philosophical concepts in the European cultural area. The concept of “karma” offered a significant ethical and ontological alternative to both materialistic philosophy and classical theism and attracted special attention of the general public. The article aims to characterize the interpretation of karma in Russian indology and theosophy in the late 19th – early 20th centuries, and to reveal the key similarities and differences of its’ comparative methodology. The materials of the Russian buddhologist F.I. Shcherbatskoy and one of the leaders of the theosophical current in Russia E.F. Pisareva represent main cases of the research. F.I. Shcherbatskoy and E.F. Pisareva looked forward to the neovitalistic concepts for justification of belief in the existence of spiritual evolution depending on internal rather than external factors. Indology and theosophy used European scientific concepts for a cultural translation of Indian philosophical concepts, but applied different bases of evidence (textual analysis and personal experience) and comparative methodology. Indology sought, as it is seen in the case of F.I. Shcherbatskoy, to unfold the basics of “eternal philosophy” – just like the tradition of intercultural philosophy did – while theosophy believed it had already been revealed in the works of E.P. Blavatsky and applied it as tool of European cultural criticism.
{"title":"The Dispute over “karma”: the Cultural Reception of the Indian Concept in Russian Philosophy in the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries","authors":"Vladislav S. Razdyakonov","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2023-9-191-201","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-9-191-201","url":null,"abstract":"The last third of the 19th century saw a widespread dissemination of Indian philosophical concepts in the European cultural area. The concept of “karma” offered a significant ethical and ontological alternative to both materialistic philosophy and classical theism and attracted special attention of the general public. The article aims to characterize the interpretation of karma in Russian indology and theosophy in the late 19th – early 20th centuries, and to reveal the key similarities and differences of its’ comparative methodology. The materials of the Russian buddhologist F.I. Shcherbatskoy and one of the leaders of the theosophical current in Russia E.F. Pisareva represent main cases of the research. F.I. Shcherbatskoy and E.F. Pisareva looked forward to the neovitalistic concepts for justification of belief in the existence of spiritual evolution depending on internal rather than external factors. Indology and theosophy used European scientific concepts for a cultural translation of Indian philosophical concepts, but applied different bases of evidence (textual analysis and personal experience) and comparative methodology. Indology sought, as it is seen in the case of F.I. Shcherbatskoy, to unfold the basics of “eternal philosophy” – just like the tradition of intercultural philosophy did – while theosophy believed it had already been revealed in the works of E.P. Blavatsky and applied it as tool of European cultural criticism.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":"160 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134887761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.21146/0042-8744-2023-10-161-168
Chen Peijun, Tatiana S. Sadova
The article considers the term ‘priroda’ [‘nature’] as a translational reflection of the Russian orientalist, an outstanding sinologist of the 19th century Nikita Ya. Bichurin (1777–1853), connected with the understanding of the concept of xing, conveyed by the hieroglyph 性 in the Chinese educational book of the 13th century Three Word Primer (Sanzijing). It is pointed out that by the beginning of the 19th century Russian philosophical terminology was at the stage of formation, that translations of Russian scientists of foreign-language philosophical works had a great influence on the entry of a particular term into the system of Russian terminological designations. In this regard, the translations of Chinese sources of philosophical content by Bichurin in the middle of the 19th century deserve attention. On the example of one term ‘priroda’ [‘nature’], the author’s methods of interpretation and, from his point of view, the most accurate transmission of the Chinese concept of xing (性) are demonstrated both in the notes and directly in the translation text, using various techniques (epithets, antitheses, stylistic contrast). The translations of the Sanzijing close to Bichurin’s, made by his predecessors, sinologists of the 18th century – Illarion K. Rossokhin (1707–1761) and Alexey L. Leontiev (1716–1786), the peculiarities of the perception of the concept of xing by three translators in similar contexts are noted. The role of the text environment in their attempts to convey a complex concept that had a long-standing internal Chinese worldview evolution is emphasized.
{"title":"Three Word Primer (Sanzijing): the Philosophical Term ‘priroda’ [‘nature’] in Nikita Ya. Bichurin Translation","authors":"Chen Peijun, Tatiana S. Sadova","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2023-10-161-168","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-10-161-168","url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the term ‘priroda’ [‘nature’] as a translational reflection of the Russian orientalist, an outstanding sinologist of the 19th century Nikita Ya. Bichurin (1777–1853), connected with the understanding of the concept of xing, conveyed by the hieroglyph 性 in the Chinese educational book of the 13th century Three Word Primer (Sanzijing). It is pointed out that by the beginning of the 19th century Russian philosophical terminology was at the stage of formation, that translations of Russian scientists of foreign-language philosophical works had a great influence on the entry of a particular term into the system of Russian terminological designations. In this regard, the translations of Chinese sources of philosophical content by Bichurin in the middle of the 19th century deserve attention. On the example of one term ‘priroda’ [‘nature’], the author’s methods of interpretation and, from his point of view, the most accurate transmission of the Chinese concept of xing (性) are demonstrated both in the notes and directly in the translation text, using various techniques (epithets, antitheses, stylistic contrast). The translations of the Sanzijing close to Bichurin’s, made by his predecessors, sinologists of the 18th century – Illarion K. Rossokhin (1707–1761) and Alexey L. Leontiev (1716–1786), the peculiarities of the perception of the concept of xing by three translators in similar contexts are noted. The role of the text environment in their attempts to convey a complex concept that had a long-standing internal Chinese worldview evolution is emphasized.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134888150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.21146/0042-8744-2023-7-53-55
Nikolay A. Chervyakov
{"title":"Beyond Literary Genres and Geographic Boundaries: Various Forms of Russian Philosophy (A Review of the Section “Philosophy and Literature”)","authors":"Nikolay A. Chervyakov","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2023-7-53-55","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-7-53-55","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134888275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.21146/0042-8744-2023-7-59-68
Nadezhda A. Kasavina
The interview is devoted to the problem of existential experience, personal development, the role of existential philosophy in the cultural space, its dynamics and modern tasks. The question of the possibility of talking about existence, referring not only to the existence of man, but also to the existence of an animal, is problematized. The “third wave” of existentialism (or neuroexistentialism) is considered, which concerns anxiety before the “disenchantment” of human nature, which carries new facets of the crisis of meaning. In the development of existentialism, the role of the socio-cultural context is emphasized, its historical stages or “waves” are highlighted. The complex conjugation of the sensual and the rational in existential formation is shown. Experience is interpreted as a multifaceted phenomenon that includes intellectual reflection, embodied in memory, comprehension of situations and events, establishing a connection in personal history. The human experience is culturally loaded, associated with the development and living of cultural archetypes and patterns, and includes the personal work of a person on himself, his growth in the perspective of the always relevant question of meaning and the answer to it. In the context of personal development, the concept of metaexistence is touched upon, which addresses the spiritual maturity of a person, the integration of experience and the experience of meaningfulness and value of life.
{"title":"“Existence is Destiny…” The Conversation of N.N. Shulgin and N.A. Kasavina","authors":"Nadezhda A. Kasavina","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2023-7-59-68","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-7-59-68","url":null,"abstract":"The interview is devoted to the problem of existential experience, personal development, the role of existential philosophy in the cultural space, its dynamics and modern tasks. The question of the possibility of talking about existence, referring not only to the existence of man, but also to the existence of an animal, is problematized. The “third wave” of existentialism (or neuroexistentialism) is considered, which concerns anxiety before the “disenchantment” of human nature, which carries new facets of the crisis of meaning. In the development of existentialism, the role of the socio-cultural context is emphasized, its historical stages or “waves” are highlighted. The complex conjugation of the sensual and the rational in existential formation is shown. Experience is interpreted as a multifaceted phenomenon that includes intellectual reflection, embodied in memory, comprehension of situations and events, establishing a connection in personal history. The human experience is culturally loaded, associated with the development and living of cultural archetypes and patterns, and includes the personal work of a person on himself, his growth in the perspective of the always relevant question of meaning and the answer to it. In the context of personal development, the concept of metaexistence is touched upon, which addresses the spiritual maturity of a person, the integration of experience and the experience of meaningfulness and value of life.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134888588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.21146/0042-8744-2023-5-86-96
Victor V. Bychkov
In his Preschool of Aesthetics the German writer Jean Paul (Johann Friedrich Richter) in some sense has laid the foundation of the aesthetics of German Romanticism through an analysis of the main principles of poetry, which is understood as artistic word at large. Proceeding from Aristotle’s Poetics, he claims that poetry is a beautiful (as well as spiritual) imitation of nature, both external (the one we perceive by the senses) and internal (the one we become spiritually aware of). As a result, this “imitation” essentially becomes a transformation of reality. Therefore the imagination and fantasy, or “power of images”, play a significant role in the creation of a poetic work. Jean Paul distinguishes between the following stages of fantasy: simple perception, talanted creativity and the work of genius. Genius, as the highest level of fantasy, possesses two powers: the divine instinct of the subconsious and deliberation. It is precisely genius that is capable of creating Romantic poetry on the basis of the aforesaid powers. The German forerunner of Romanticism compares two poetic epochs: ancient Greek, with its characteristic plasticity, beauty (the ideal), peaceful clarity and moral grace, and the contemporary (Romantic), whose essence consists in its Christian character, sublimity, the beauty of the infinite, the miraculous and marvelous world of the spirits, which are manifested to the soul of the recipient subject by way of a specific organization of the poetic text.
{"title":"The Way to the Aesthetics of Romanticism: Jean Paul","authors":"Victor V. Bychkov","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2023-5-86-96","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-5-86-96","url":null,"abstract":"In his Preschool of Aesthetics the German writer Jean Paul (Johann Friedrich Richter) in some sense has laid the foundation of the aesthetics of German Romanticism through an analysis of the main principles of poetry, which is understood as artistic word at large. Proceeding from Aristotle’s Poetics, he claims that poetry is a beautiful (as well as spiritual) imitation of nature, both external (the one we perceive by the senses) and internal (the one we become spiritually aware of). As a result, this “imitation” essentially becomes a transformation of reality. Therefore the imagination and fantasy, or “power of images”, play a significant role in the creation of a poetic work. Jean Paul distinguishes between the following stages of fantasy: simple perception, talanted creativity and the work of genius. Genius, as the highest level of fantasy, possesses two powers: the divine instinct of the subconsious and deliberation. It is precisely genius that is capable of creating Romantic poetry on the basis of the aforesaid powers. The German forerunner of Romanticism compares two poetic epochs: ancient Greek, with its characteristic plasticity, beauty (the ideal), peaceful clarity and moral grace, and the contemporary (Romantic), whose essence consists in its Christian character, sublimity, the beauty of the infinite, the miraculous and marvelous world of the spirits, which are manifested to the soul of the recipient subject by way of a specific organization of the poetic text.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":"246 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134888918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.21146/0042-8744-2023-5-75-78
Sergey A. Nickolsky
Ideology as a subject (image) and subject (content and plot) is present in Russian philosophical literature, as in any literary classic, constantly – from the moment of its appearance in the late XVIII to the mid-30s of the twentieth century. For almost a century and a half, it had the opportunity, with varying degrees of censorship, in general, it manifested itself quite freely. However, after the 1st Congress of Soviet Writers, a ban was imposed on all its manifestations, except those officially permitted within the framework of “socialist realism”, which was lifted only in the second half of the 80s. Nevertheless, since artistic texts remain an important element of culture that influences the existence of the modern ideological landscape, the idea of their ideological content deserves to be developed. What is ideological in philosophical literature, which most often reveals itself as a focus on changing the present, that is, reconstruction, is considered in the first approximation by referring to the texts of D.I. Fonvizin, A.S. Griboyedov, A.S. Pushkin, N.V. Gogol, I.S. Turgenev, I.A. Goncharov, N.S. Leskov, F.M. Dostoevsky, A.M. Gorky and A.P. Platonov.
{"title":"Ideology as a Subject and Subject of Representation in Russian Philosophizing Literature","authors":"Sergey A. Nickolsky","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2023-5-75-78","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-5-75-78","url":null,"abstract":"Ideology as a subject (image) and subject (content and plot) is present in Russian philosophical literature, as in any literary classic, constantly – from the moment of its appearance in the late XVIII to the mid-30s of the twentieth century. For almost a century and a half, it had the opportunity, with varying degrees of censorship, in general, it manifested itself quite freely. However, after the 1st Congress of Soviet Writers, a ban was imposed on all its manifestations, except those officially permitted within the framework of “socialist realism”, which was lifted only in the second half of the 80s. Nevertheless, since artistic texts remain an important element of culture that influences the existence of the modern ideological landscape, the idea of their ideological content deserves to be developed. What is ideological in philosophical literature, which most often reveals itself as a focus on changing the present, that is, reconstruction, is considered in the first approximation by referring to the texts of D.I. Fonvizin, A.S. Griboyedov, A.S. Pushkin, N.V. Gogol, I.S. Turgenev, I.A. Goncharov, N.S. Leskov, F.M. Dostoevsky, A.M. Gorky and A.P. Platonov.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134888928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.21146/0042-8744-2023-7-19-23
Irina I. Blauberg
The question of time can be attributed as one of the most important in the works of P.P. Gaidenko. Almost from the very beginning of her philosophical activity it was constantly in the center of her attention. The article briefly traces the main milestones in her consideration of the problem of time – from a dissertation on the philosophy of Heidegger (1963) to a generalizing book “Time. Duration. Eternity. The Problem of Time in European Philosophy and Science” (2006), which sums up many years of Piama Pavlovna’s research on this topic. Here the names of three great Greek thinkers – Plato, Aristotle and Plotinus – appear as symbols of various approaches to understanding time. For a long time, it determined the lines of further theoretical research. In the book the internal semantic echoes that permeate the entire text are very important. Piama P. Gaidenko shows how some models of the interpretation of time, proposed in Antiquity and then in medieval philosophy, are reproduced in various forms in subsequent eras and testify to the complex interaction of philosophical traditions as well as to a change in ways of thinking. The main lines of research outlined in the book clearly show both continuity and differences in approaches to the philosophical understanding of time in different periods. The book expresses not only the philosophical, but also the personal position of Piama P. Gaidenko, which was clearly manifested in the interpretation of the question of the relationship between time and eternity. In this sense, of particular interest is the critique of the characteristic tendency of the philosophy of process, which is reflected in the denial of eternity or understanding it simply as infinite time.
时间问题是盖登科作品中最重要的问题之一。几乎从她开始从事哲学活动的那一刻起，它就一直是她关注的中心。本文简要地追溯了她思考时间问题的主要里程碑——从一篇关于海德格尔哲学的论文(1963)到一本概括的书《时间》。持续时间。永恒。《欧洲哲学与科学中的时间问题》(2006)，总结了Piama Pavlovna多年来对这一课题的研究。在这里，三位伟大的希腊思想家——柏拉图、亚里士多德和普罗提诺——的名字作为理解时间的各种方法的象征出现。在很长一段时间里，它决定了进一步理论研究的方向。在书中，贯穿全文的内部语义呼应是非常重要的。Piama P. Gaidenko展示了一些在古代和中世纪哲学中提出的时间解释模型是如何在随后的时代以各种形式复制的，并证明了哲学传统的复杂相互作用以及思维方式的变化。书中概述的研究主线清楚地显示了不同时期对时间的哲学理解方法的连续性和差异。这本书不仅表达了皮亚玛·p·盖登科的哲学立场，而且还表达了他的个人立场，这一点在对时间与永恒的关系问题的解释中得到了清楚的体现。在这个意义上，特别值得注意的是对过程哲学的典型倾向的批判，这种倾向反映在否认永恒或把永恒简单地理解为无限的时间。
{"title":"The Problem of Time in the Works of P.P. Gaidenko","authors":"Irina I. Blauberg","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2023-7-19-23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-7-19-23","url":null,"abstract":"The question of time can be attributed as one of the most important in the works of P.P. Gaidenko. Almost from the very beginning of her philosophical activity it was constantly in the center of her attention. The article briefly traces the main milestones in her consideration of the problem of time – from a dissertation on the philosophy of Heidegger (1963) to a generalizing book “Time. Duration. Eternity. The Problem of Time in European Philosophy and Science” (2006), which sums up many years of Piama Pavlovna’s research on this topic. Here the names of three great Greek thinkers – Plato, Aristotle and Plotinus – appear as symbols of various approaches to understanding time. For a long time, it determined the lines of further theoretical research. In the book the internal semantic echoes that permeate the entire text are very important. Piama P. Gaidenko shows how some models of the interpretation of time, proposed in Antiquity and then in medieval philosophy, are reproduced in various forms in subsequent eras and testify to the complex interaction of philosophical traditions as well as to a change in ways of thinking. The main lines of research outlined in the book clearly show both continuity and differences in approaches to the philosophical understanding of time in different periods. The book expresses not only the philosophical, but also the personal position of Piama P. Gaidenko, which was clearly manifested in the interpretation of the question of the relationship between time and eternity. In this sense, of particular interest is the critique of the characteristic tendency of the philosophy of process, which is reflected in the denial of eternity or understanding it simply as infinite time.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134889363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.21146/0042-8744-2023-5-208-213
Taisiia S. Paniotova, Gennady V. Drach, Maxim A. Romanenko
In today’s difficult geopolitical situation, when social alarmism dominates in the public mind, it is important to comprehend the domestic experience of constructing positive images of the future. Utopia is directly related to this, despite the trail of a “companion of totalitarianism”, a “negative pole” charged with “poisonous energy”, etc., following it in Russian, mostly liberal, humanitarian studies. How can these characteristics be combined with another generally recognized statement: utopia is one of the main achievements in the history of the Western ideas, which is directly related to philosophy, literature, politics, and art; is it deeply rooted in human nature, because it is connected with the dream to break with the unsatisfying surrounding reality to create an alternative, more perfect world? The 4th All-Russian (with international participants) scientific conference “Utopian projects in the history of culture”, held October 26–28, 2022 at the Southern Federal University (Rostov-on-Don) on the topic “Russian experience in constructing the future” was an attempt to overcome this “cognitive dissonance”.
{"title":"Utopia in the History of Russian Culture: Repeating the Past or Constructing the Future? (review of scientific conference)","authors":"Taisiia S. Paniotova, Gennady V. Drach, Maxim A. Romanenko","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2023-5-208-213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-5-208-213","url":null,"abstract":"In today’s difficult geopolitical situation, when social alarmism dominates in the public mind, it is important to comprehend the domestic experience of constructing positive images of the future. Utopia is directly related to this, despite the trail of a “companion of totalitarianism”, a “negative pole” charged with “poisonous energy”, etc., following it in Russian, mostly liberal, humanitarian studies. How can these characteristics be combined with another generally recognized statement: utopia is one of the main achievements in the history of the Western ideas, which is directly related to philosophy, literature, politics, and art; is it deeply rooted in human nature, because it is connected with the dream to break with the unsatisfying surrounding reality to create an alternative, more perfect world? The 4th All-Russian (with international participants) scientific conference “Utopian projects in the history of culture”, held October 26–28, 2022 at the Southern Federal University (Rostov-on-Don) on the topic “Russian experience in constructing the future” was an attempt to overcome this “cognitive dissonance”.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":"17 Suppl 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134889386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.21146/0042-8744-2023-6-116-123
Ekaterina N. Gnatik
The article deals with the phenomenon of gamification and the problems of implementing game practices in higher education. Based on the information about consumer habits, style features of behavior, etc., gamification becomes a fairly effective IT tool that contributes to achieving the goals of one or another project by way of constructing artificially player motivation, i.e., in fact, programming for a certain behavior pattern. The paper notes that the Western trend of mass inclusion of games and game technologies in curricula has become a significant reference point for domestic educational policy, and gamification is now discussed as a new, alternative way of organizing learning in educational institutions of our country, which allows to significantly influence student behavior and the effectiveness of learning outcomes. Analyzing possible consequences and trying to take into account the explicit and latent risks, the author concludes that the most alarming trend of gamification implementation in the educational process is the creation of unprecedented opportunities for collecting data on student behavior in the digital educational space. Tracking reactions and psychoemotional state of young people in the course of gamified learning, the use of artificial intelligence technologies, neural networks, the use of learning action analysis technologies, digital footprint analysis – all these may help to build and improve the behavior management strategy required by customers. Here we see the prospects of making a testing range for large-scale work to create additional means of control, standardization and correction with the view to improve the techniques of manipulating the consciousness and behavior of the masses of people. In the author’s opinion, the transformation of learning into a computer game will promote not only a significant deformation of the inner meaning of pedagogics, but also the transformation of student youth into an object of various manipulations using the high-human methodology, which widely applies the tools of smart technology.
{"title":"Gamification as a Growing Trend in Higher Education: Prospects and Problems","authors":"Ekaterina N. Gnatik","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2023-6-116-123","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-6-116-123","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the phenomenon of gamification and the problems of implementing game practices in higher education. Based on the information about consumer habits, style features of behavior, etc., gamification becomes a fairly effective IT tool that contributes to achieving the goals of one or another project by way of constructing artificially player motivation, i.e., in fact, programming for a certain behavior pattern. The paper notes that the Western trend of mass inclusion of games and game technologies in curricula has become a significant reference point for domestic educational policy, and gamification is now discussed as a new, alternative way of organizing learning in educational institutions of our country, which allows to significantly influence student behavior and the effectiveness of learning outcomes. Analyzing possible consequences and trying to take into account the explicit and latent risks, the author concludes that the most alarming trend of gamification implementation in the educational process is the creation of unprecedented opportunities for collecting data on student behavior in the digital educational space. Tracking reactions and psychoemotional state of young people in the course of gamified learning, the use of artificial intelligence technologies, neural networks, the use of learning action analysis technologies, digital footprint analysis – all these may help to build and improve the behavior management strategy required by customers. Here we see the prospects of making a testing range for large-scale work to create additional means of control, standardization and correction with the view to improve the techniques of manipulating the consciousness and behavior of the masses of people. In the author’s opinion, the transformation of learning into a computer game will promote not only a significant deformation of the inner meaning of pedagogics, but also the transformation of student youth into an object of various manipulations using the high-human methodology, which widely applies the tools of smart technology.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134889789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：