Hanne Christensen, Francesca Romana Pezzella, Melinda Berg Roaldsen, Aleš Tomek, Arlene Wilkie, Louisa Christensen, Martin Dichgans, Avril Drummond, Tiina Laatikainen, Carlos A Molina, Katharina S Sunnerhagen, Danilo Toni, Sonia Abilleira, Diana Aguiar de Sousa, Anita Arsovska, Heinrich Audebert, Jelena Bartolovic, Yannick Béjot, Geert Jan Biessels, Juliet Bouverie, Hrvoje Budincevic, Barbara Casolla, Hugues Chabriat, Marina Charalambous, Jesse Dawson, Stephanie Debette, Frank-Erik de Leeuw, Adam Denes, Marina Diomedi, Diederik Dippel, Ulrich Dirnagl, Urs Fischer, Yuriy Flomin, Ana Catarina Fonseca, Birgitte Forchammer, Anne Forster, Giovanni Frisullo, Miquel Galofre, Zuzana Gdovinová, Christoph Gumbinger, Joseph Harbison, Richard Hobbs, Dalius Jatuzis, Hrvoje Jurlina, Mira Katan, Lisa Kidd, Stefan Kiechl, Janika Kõrv, Christina Kruuse, Wilfried Lang, Arthur Liesz, Svetlana Lorenzano, Andreas Luft, Grethe Lunde, Chris Macey, Hugh Stephan Markus, Gillian Mead, Patrik Michel, Serefnur Ozturk, Maurizio Paciaroni, Aleksandra Pavlovic, Carina U Persson, Terence J Quinn, Peter Rothwell, Luca Saba, Paola Santalucia, Gustavo Santo, Claus Simonsen, Thorsten Steiner, Katarzyna Stolarz-Skrzypek, Cristina Tiu, Alexander Tsiskaridze, Georgios Tsivgoulis, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Teresa Ulberg, Paolo Ursillo, Antonella Urso, Mia van Euler, Margus Viigimaa, Denis Vivien, Markus Wagner, Marion Walker, Alastair Webb, Diana Wong Ramos, Mauro Zampolini, Marialuisa Zedde, Gary Ford, Peter Kelly, Robert Mikulik, Bo Norrving, Hariklia Proios, Simona Sacco, Else Sandset, Joanna Wardlaw, Aleksandras Vilionskis, Valeria Caso
Objectives: Implementation of the Stroke Action Plan for Europe (2018-2030) (SAP-E) was initiated in 2019. It is now updated at mid-term to reflect and respond to challenges for stroke care in Europe in 2025.
Methods: The SAP-E covers the entire chain of stroke care. The sections (state of the art, current status and targets) were developed by working groups and finalised based on inputs from the Interim Review Committee and an open online meeting. Targets for 2030 were updated to reflect current knowledge, to prioritise and to increase accountability.
Results: All sections have been updated based on the newest evidence to reflect the state of the art and current status in 2025.
Conclusion: Stroke remains a significant health issue in Europe, with notable incidence and inequities in access to care. Key interventions are strongly evidence-based, cost-effective and supported by World Health Organization and European Union recommendations. Despite improvements, gaps remain across the care pathway but particularly in terms of access to stroke units, rehabilitation and follow-up. To control and reduce the burden of stroke, the main action points are: (1) national stroke plans, which encompass the entire chain of care and are reflected in reimbursement systems, (2) quality and outcome control, where impact is measured at both individual and health care system level, (3) robust and resilient health care organisation covering the entire chain of care that promotes equal access to sustainable, timely and evidence-based stroke care and (4) effective national strategies to promote and facilitate a healthy lifestyle and risk factor control.
{"title":"Stroke Action Plan for Europe 2018-2030 (SAP-E): mid-term review and update.","authors":"Hanne Christensen, Francesca Romana Pezzella, Melinda Berg Roaldsen, Aleš Tomek, Arlene Wilkie, Louisa Christensen, Martin Dichgans, Avril Drummond, Tiina Laatikainen, Carlos A Molina, Katharina S Sunnerhagen, Danilo Toni, Sonia Abilleira, Diana Aguiar de Sousa, Anita Arsovska, Heinrich Audebert, Jelena Bartolovic, Yannick Béjot, Geert Jan Biessels, Juliet Bouverie, Hrvoje Budincevic, Barbara Casolla, Hugues Chabriat, Marina Charalambous, Jesse Dawson, Stephanie Debette, Frank-Erik de Leeuw, Adam Denes, Marina Diomedi, Diederik Dippel, Ulrich Dirnagl, Urs Fischer, Yuriy Flomin, Ana Catarina Fonseca, Birgitte Forchammer, Anne Forster, Giovanni Frisullo, Miquel Galofre, Zuzana Gdovinová, Christoph Gumbinger, Joseph Harbison, Richard Hobbs, Dalius Jatuzis, Hrvoje Jurlina, Mira Katan, Lisa Kidd, Stefan Kiechl, Janika Kõrv, Christina Kruuse, Wilfried Lang, Arthur Liesz, Svetlana Lorenzano, Andreas Luft, Grethe Lunde, Chris Macey, Hugh Stephan Markus, Gillian Mead, Patrik Michel, Serefnur Ozturk, Maurizio Paciaroni, Aleksandra Pavlovic, Carina U Persson, Terence J Quinn, Peter Rothwell, Luca Saba, Paola Santalucia, Gustavo Santo, Claus Simonsen, Thorsten Steiner, Katarzyna Stolarz-Skrzypek, Cristina Tiu, Alexander Tsiskaridze, Georgios Tsivgoulis, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Teresa Ulberg, Paolo Ursillo, Antonella Urso, Mia van Euler, Margus Viigimaa, Denis Vivien, Markus Wagner, Marion Walker, Alastair Webb, Diana Wong Ramos, Mauro Zampolini, Marialuisa Zedde, Gary Ford, Peter Kelly, Robert Mikulik, Bo Norrving, Hariklia Proios, Simona Sacco, Else Sandset, Joanna Wardlaw, Aleksandras Vilionskis, Valeria Caso","doi":"10.1093/esj/aakaf026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakaf026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Implementation of the Stroke Action Plan for Europe (2018-2030) (SAP-E) was initiated in 2019. It is now updated at mid-term to reflect and respond to challenges for stroke care in Europe in 2025.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SAP-E covers the entire chain of stroke care. The sections (state of the art, current status and targets) were developed by working groups and finalised based on inputs from the Interim Review Committee and an open online meeting. Targets for 2030 were updated to reflect current knowledge, to prioritise and to increase accountability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All sections have been updated based on the newest evidence to reflect the state of the art and current status in 2025.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stroke remains a significant health issue in Europe, with notable incidence and inequities in access to care. Key interventions are strongly evidence-based, cost-effective and supported by World Health Organization and European Union recommendations. Despite improvements, gaps remain across the care pathway but particularly in terms of access to stroke units, rehabilitation and follow-up. To control and reduce the burden of stroke, the main action points are: (1) national stroke plans, which encompass the entire chain of care and are reflected in reimbursement systems, (2) quality and outcome control, where impact is measured at both individual and health care system level, (3) robust and resilient health care organisation covering the entire chain of care that promotes equal access to sustainable, timely and evidence-based stroke care and (4) effective national strategies to promote and facilitate a healthy lifestyle and risk factor control.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Elevated blood pressure (BP) in acute hemorrhagic stroke has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Limited data from randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) indicate that early BP management, in the prehospital setting, may be safe and beneficial. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prehospital BP-lowering in acute hemorrhagic stroke when compared to usual care.
Patients and methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis including available RCTs evaluating prehospital BP-lowering among acute hemorrhagic stroke patients. The pooled risk ratio (RR) of a 3-month good functional outcome, defined as modified-Rankin-Scale scores of 0-2 and all-cause 3-month mortality were the primary efficacy and safety outcomes, respectively. Secondary outcomes included the pooled RR of hematoma expansion (HE) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
Results: A total of four RCTs were included, comprising 642 patients treated with prehospital BP-lowering therapies and 617 patients receiving usual care. Prehospital BP-lowering was associated with similar rates of good functional outcome (RR: 1.07; 95% CI, 0.52-2.19) and all-cause mortality (RR: 0.90; 95% CI, 0.60-1.35) at 3 months, compared to usual care. The risk of SAEs (RR: 0.97; 95% CI, 0.74-1.26) and HE (RR: 1.05; 95% CI, 0.45-2.46) did not significantly differ between the two groups. Subgroup analyses revealed the superiority of the α-adrenoreceptor blocker urapidil compared to glyceryl trinitrate in terms of reducing SAE risk and HE.
Conclusion: Our meta-analysis indicates that prehospital BP-lowering in acute hemorrhagic stroke does not improve functional outcome and survival. Future RCTs conducted in mobile stroke units, and exclusively focusing on patients with acute hemorrhagic stroke, are required.
{"title":"Prehospital blood pressure lowering in acute hemorrhagic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.","authors":"Aikaterini Theodorou, Konstantinos Melanis, Lina Palaiodimou, Georgia Papagiannopoulou, Eleni Bakola, Maria Chondrogianni, Apostolos Safouris, Alexandra Frogoudaki, Ioanna Koutroulou, Theodoros Karapanayiotides, Effrosyni Koutsouraki, Silke Walter, Maren Ranhoff Hov, Janika Kõrv, Else Charlotte Sandset, Efstathios Manios, Georgios Tsivgoulis","doi":"10.1093/esj/aakaf023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakaf023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Elevated blood pressure (BP) in acute hemorrhagic stroke has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Limited data from randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) indicate that early BP management, in the prehospital setting, may be safe and beneficial. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prehospital BP-lowering in acute hemorrhagic stroke when compared to usual care.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis including available RCTs evaluating prehospital BP-lowering among acute hemorrhagic stroke patients. The pooled risk ratio (RR) of a 3-month good functional outcome, defined as modified-Rankin-Scale scores of 0-2 and all-cause 3-month mortality were the primary efficacy and safety outcomes, respectively. Secondary outcomes included the pooled RR of hematoma expansion (HE) and serious adverse events (SAEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of four RCTs were included, comprising 642 patients treated with prehospital BP-lowering therapies and 617 patients receiving usual care. Prehospital BP-lowering was associated with similar rates of good functional outcome (RR: 1.07; 95% CI, 0.52-2.19) and all-cause mortality (RR: 0.90; 95% CI, 0.60-1.35) at 3 months, compared to usual care. The risk of SAEs (RR: 0.97; 95% CI, 0.74-1.26) and HE (RR: 1.05; 95% CI, 0.45-2.46) did not significantly differ between the two groups. Subgroup analyses revealed the superiority of the α-adrenoreceptor blocker urapidil compared to glyceryl trinitrate in terms of reducing SAE risk and HE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our meta-analysis indicates that prehospital BP-lowering in acute hemorrhagic stroke does not improve functional outcome and survival. Future RCTs conducted in mobile stroke units, and exclusively focusing on patients with acute hemorrhagic stroke, are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Giovanni Furlanis, Katerina Iscra, Edoardo Ricci, Michele Malesani, Gabriele Prandin, Emanuele Vincis, Laura Mancinelli, Federica Palacino, Magda Quagliotto, Paola Caruso, Marcello Naccarato, Miloš Ajčević, Paolo Manganotti
Introduction: Electroencephalography (EEG) features are emerging as valuable prognostic indicators in acute stroke. However, data on the predictive value of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) remain limited. This study aimed to assess the prognostic role of IEDs in predicting functional outcomes in stroke patients without symptomatic seizures who underwent point-of-care EEG within 72 h of admission.
Patients and methods: We retrospectively analysed the clinical, neurophysiological and neuroimaging data of acute stroke patients who underwent point-of-care EEG within 72 h of admission. Interictal epileptiform discharges were identified according to the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology criteria. A multivariate logistic regression model identified variables associated with modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores of 3-6 at 3 months.
Results: Among 593 stroke patients (median age 77 years, range 22-98; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] 5, range 0-25), 18.2% exhibited IEDs on EEG within 72 h of admission. At 3-month follow-up, 223 patients (37.6%) demonstrated poor functional outcome (mRS 3-6). The presence of IEDs on EEG (odds ratio [OR] = 1.088, P = .037), along with age (OR = 1.004, P < .001), NIHSS at admission (OR = 1.032, P < .001), premorbid disability (OR = 1.111, P < .001), hemorrhagic stroke (OR = 1.120, P < .001) and lesion extent (OR = 1.070, P < .001), was an independent predictor of poor clinical outcomes at 3 months (mRS 3-6). The logistic regression model, including these factors, achieved 81% accuracy in predicting functional outcomes.
Conclusion: Early IEDs on EEG within 72 h are independent predictors of poor clinical outcomes (mRS 3-6) at 3 months. These findings underscore the importance of EEG monitoring in the acute phase of stroke and suggest that IED detection may serve as an additional prognostic marker.
{"title":"Interictal epileptiform activity in the acute stroke phase: an independent predictor of poor outcome.","authors":"Giovanni Furlanis, Katerina Iscra, Edoardo Ricci, Michele Malesani, Gabriele Prandin, Emanuele Vincis, Laura Mancinelli, Federica Palacino, Magda Quagliotto, Paola Caruso, Marcello Naccarato, Miloš Ajčević, Paolo Manganotti","doi":"10.1093/esj/aakaf001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakaf001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Electroencephalography (EEG) features are emerging as valuable prognostic indicators in acute stroke. However, data on the predictive value of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) remain limited. This study aimed to assess the prognostic role of IEDs in predicting functional outcomes in stroke patients without symptomatic seizures who underwent point-of-care EEG within 72 h of admission.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed the clinical, neurophysiological and neuroimaging data of acute stroke patients who underwent point-of-care EEG within 72 h of admission. Interictal epileptiform discharges were identified according to the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology criteria. A multivariate logistic regression model identified variables associated with modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores of 3-6 at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 593 stroke patients (median age 77 years, range 22-98; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] 5, range 0-25), 18.2% exhibited IEDs on EEG within 72 h of admission. At 3-month follow-up, 223 patients (37.6%) demonstrated poor functional outcome (mRS 3-6). The presence of IEDs on EEG (odds ratio [OR] = 1.088, P = .037), along with age (OR = 1.004, P < .001), NIHSS at admission (OR = 1.032, P < .001), premorbid disability (OR = 1.111, P < .001), hemorrhagic stroke (OR = 1.120, P < .001) and lesion extent (OR = 1.070, P < .001), was an independent predictor of poor clinical outcomes at 3 months (mRS 3-6). The logistic regression model, including these factors, achieved 81% accuracy in predicting functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early IEDs on EEG within 72 h are independent predictors of poor clinical outcomes (mRS 3-6) at 3 months. These findings underscore the importance of EEG monitoring in the acute phase of stroke and suggest that IED detection may serve as an additional prognostic marker.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/esj/23969873251362012
Wouter J Dronkers, Menno R Germans, René Post, Bert A Coert, Jonathan M Coutinho, René van den Berg, William Peter Vandertop
Introduction: Non-aneurysmal, non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (nSAH) refers to cases where a causative aneurysm cannot be identified. We studied 6-months' outcomes in nSAH patients.
Patients and methods: From a prospective SAH registry of all nSAH patients admitted between 2012 and 2023, relevant complications and outcomes were collected. Functional outcome and return-to-work at 6 months were assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), quality of life with the EuroQol-5Dimensions (EQ-5D) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and an institutional 14-item questionnaire for assessment of residual symptoms.
Results: 325 consecutive nSAH patients were included (192 non-perimesencephalic, non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (NPSAH); 133 perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage (PMSAH)). 303 (93%; 180 NPSAH and 123 PMSAH) were available at follow-up (7 patients died). Favorable functional outcome (mRS-score 0-2) was reported in 271 (89%) patients and did not differ between NPSAH- and PMSAH. One hundred forty-one (77%) patients returned to work, whereas only 71 (39%) patients reached their previous level of work. PMSAH patients were more likely to return to work (68/96 (71%) NPSAH and 73/87 (84%) PMSAH, respectively, p = 0.036). Furthermore, PMSAH patients were more likely to fully return to work (p = 0.028). The mean (SD) EQ-5D and EQ-VAS scores were 0.827 (0.184) and 74 (16), respectively. The HADS-A and -D scores were deviant (score > 7 points) in 53 (23%) and 48 (21%) patients, respectively. Only 39 patients (16%) denied experiencing residual symptoms. Increased fatigue (n = 164; 68%), increased concentration difficulties (n = 130; 54%), and increased forgetfulness (n = 121; 50%) were the most frequently reported residual symptoms.
Discussion and conclusion: This study reveals that the majority of nSAH patients reports residual symptoms and did not return to their previous level of work at 6 months follow-up, despite a favorable functional outcome. These findings nuance the perception of a good outcome, as suggested in previous studies, warranting further research on possible rehabilitative interventions and counseling in these patients.
{"title":"Functional outcome, return to work and quality of life in patients with non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.","authors":"Wouter J Dronkers, Menno R Germans, René Post, Bert A Coert, Jonathan M Coutinho, René van den Berg, William Peter Vandertop","doi":"10.1093/esj/23969873251362012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/23969873251362012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-aneurysmal, non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (nSAH) refers to cases where a causative aneurysm cannot be identified. We studied 6-months' outcomes in nSAH patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From a prospective SAH registry of all nSAH patients admitted between 2012 and 2023, relevant complications and outcomes were collected. Functional outcome and return-to-work at 6 months were assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), quality of life with the EuroQol-5Dimensions (EQ-5D) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and an institutional 14-item questionnaire for assessment of residual symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>325 consecutive nSAH patients were included (192 non-perimesencephalic, non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (NPSAH); 133 perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage (PMSAH)). 303 (93%; 180 NPSAH and 123 PMSAH) were available at follow-up (7 patients died). Favorable functional outcome (mRS-score 0-2) was reported in 271 (89%) patients and did not differ between NPSAH- and PMSAH. One hundred forty-one (77%) patients returned to work, whereas only 71 (39%) patients reached their previous level of work. PMSAH patients were more likely to return to work (68/96 (71%) NPSAH and 73/87 (84%) PMSAH, respectively, p = 0.036). Furthermore, PMSAH patients were more likely to fully return to work (p = 0.028). The mean (SD) EQ-5D and EQ-VAS scores were 0.827 (0.184) and 74 (16), respectively. The HADS-A and -D scores were deviant (score > 7 points) in 53 (23%) and 48 (21%) patients, respectively. Only 39 patients (16%) denied experiencing residual symptoms. Increased fatigue (n = 164; 68%), increased concentration difficulties (n = 130; 54%), and increased forgetfulness (n = 121; 50%) were the most frequently reported residual symptoms.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>This study reveals that the majority of nSAH patients reports residual symptoms and did not return to their previous level of work at 6 months follow-up, despite a favorable functional outcome. These findings nuance the perception of a good outcome, as suggested in previous studies, warranting further research on possible rehabilitative interventions and counseling in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/esj/23969873251364973
Huanwen Chen, Marco Colasurdo, Hidetoshi Matsukawa, Conor Cunningham, Ilko Maier, Sami Al Kasab, Pascal Jabbour, Joon-Tae Kim, Stacey Quintero Wolfe, Ansaar Rai, Robert M Starke, Marios-Nikos Psychogios, Edgar A Samaniego, Nitin Goyal, Shinichi Yoshimura, Hugo Cuellar, Jonathan A Grossberg, Ali Alawieh, Ali Alaraj, Mohamad Ezzeldin, Daniele G Romano, Omar Tanweer, Justin Mascitelli, Isabel Fragata, Adam Polifka, Fazeel Siddiqui, Joshua Osbun, Roberto Crosa, Charles Matouk, Min S Park, Michael R Levitt, Waleed Brinjikji, Mark Moss, Travis Dumont, Ergun Daglioglu, Richard Williamson, Pedro Navia, Reade De Leacy, Shakeel Chowdhry, David J Altschul, Alejandro M Spiotta, Peter Kan
Introduction: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is an effective treatment for basilar artery occlusion (BAO) stroke in select patients. While there is a growing body of literature suggesting that advanced imaging modalities such as computed tomography perfusion (CTP) and magnetic resonance (MR) may not be necessary for selecting anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke patients for EVT, whether advanced imaging may be superior to conventional imaging (non-contrast CT and CT angiography) in identifying good treatment candidates among BAO patients is less clear.
Patients and methods: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of BAO EVT patients treated from 2013 to 2022 in the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry. Patients selected for EVT by advanced imaging (CTP or MR) were matched with those selected by conventional imaging using propensity score matching (PSM) accounting for possible confounders. Primary outcome was functional independence at 90 days. Other outcomes include bedridden state or death at 90-days and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).
Results: 268 patients were included. 150 patients were selected for BAO EVT by conventional imaging, 86 by CTP, and 32 by MR. Patients selected by advanced imaging were significantly older than those selected by conventional imaging (median age 71 vs 64 years, p = 0.001); patient characteristics were otherwise similar between cohorts. After PSM, 90-day outcomes were similar between the two cohorts (p = 0.56), with similar rates of functional independence (39.4% vs 35.1%, p = 0.65), bedridden state or death (40.4% vs 44.7%, p = 0.66), and sICH (3.3% vs 5.7%, p = 0.49) for conventional and advanced imaging groups, respectively. Results were similar across treatment time windows (all p > 0.05).
Conclusions: Selecting patients for basilar EVT using conventional versus advanced imaging did not result in different clinical outcomes, regardless of treatment time windows. Conventional imaging appears sufficient as a first-line tool for selecting basilar EVT patients in routine clinical practice.
血管内取栓术(EVT)是治疗基底动脉闭塞(BAO)脑卒中的有效方法。虽然越来越多的文献表明,在选择前循环大血管闭塞卒中患者进行EVT时,可能不需要先进的成像方式,如计算机断层扫描灌注(CTP)和磁共振(MR),但在确定BAO患者中良好的治疗候选者方面,先进的成像是否优于传统成像(非对比CT和CT血管造影)尚不清楚。患者和方法:这是一项多中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了2013年至2022年在卒中血栓切除术和动脉瘤登记中接受治疗的BAO EVT患者。通过高级成像(CTP或MR)选择EVT的患者使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)与传统成像选择的患者进行匹配,考虑可能的混杂因素。主要终点是90天的功能独立。其他结局包括90天卧床或死亡和症状性颅内出血(siich)。结果:纳入268例患者。常规影像学选择BAO EVT患者150例,CTP选择86例,mr选择32例,晚期影像学选择的患者明显大于常规影像学选择的患者(中位年龄71岁vs 64岁,p = 0.001);患者特征在其他方面在队列之间相似。PSM后,两个队列的90天结果相似(p = 0.56),常规组和高级影像学组的功能独立性(39.4% vs 35.1%, p = 0.65)、卧床状态或死亡(40.4% vs 44.7%, p = 0.66)和siich (3.3% vs 5.7%, p = 0.49)的发生率相似。不同治疗时间窗的结果相似(p < 0.05)。结论:无论治疗时间窗如何,采用常规影像学和先进影像学选择基底动脉EVT患者不会导致不同的临床结果。在常规临床实践中,常规影像学作为选择基底静脉血栓患者的一线工具是足够的。
{"title":"Conventional versus advanced imaging selection for endovascular treatment of basilar artery occlusion strokes.","authors":"Huanwen Chen, Marco Colasurdo, Hidetoshi Matsukawa, Conor Cunningham, Ilko Maier, Sami Al Kasab, Pascal Jabbour, Joon-Tae Kim, Stacey Quintero Wolfe, Ansaar Rai, Robert M Starke, Marios-Nikos Psychogios, Edgar A Samaniego, Nitin Goyal, Shinichi Yoshimura, Hugo Cuellar, Jonathan A Grossberg, Ali Alawieh, Ali Alaraj, Mohamad Ezzeldin, Daniele G Romano, Omar Tanweer, Justin Mascitelli, Isabel Fragata, Adam Polifka, Fazeel Siddiqui, Joshua Osbun, Roberto Crosa, Charles Matouk, Min S Park, Michael R Levitt, Waleed Brinjikji, Mark Moss, Travis Dumont, Ergun Daglioglu, Richard Williamson, Pedro Navia, Reade De Leacy, Shakeel Chowdhry, David J Altschul, Alejandro M Spiotta, Peter Kan","doi":"10.1093/esj/23969873251364973","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/23969873251364973","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is an effective treatment for basilar artery occlusion (BAO) stroke in select patients. While there is a growing body of literature suggesting that advanced imaging modalities such as computed tomography perfusion (CTP) and magnetic resonance (MR) may not be necessary for selecting anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke patients for EVT, whether advanced imaging may be superior to conventional imaging (non-contrast CT and CT angiography) in identifying good treatment candidates among BAO patients is less clear.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of BAO EVT patients treated from 2013 to 2022 in the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry. Patients selected for EVT by advanced imaging (CTP or MR) were matched with those selected by conventional imaging using propensity score matching (PSM) accounting for possible confounders. Primary outcome was functional independence at 90 days. Other outcomes include bedridden state or death at 90-days and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>268 patients were included. 150 patients were selected for BAO EVT by conventional imaging, 86 by CTP, and 32 by MR. Patients selected by advanced imaging were significantly older than those selected by conventional imaging (median age 71 vs 64 years, p = 0.001); patient characteristics were otherwise similar between cohorts. After PSM, 90-day outcomes were similar between the two cohorts (p = 0.56), with similar rates of functional independence (39.4% vs 35.1%, p = 0.65), bedridden state or death (40.4% vs 44.7%, p = 0.66), and sICH (3.3% vs 5.7%, p = 0.49) for conventional and advanced imaging groups, respectively. Results were similar across treatment time windows (all p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Selecting patients for basilar EVT using conventional versus advanced imaging did not result in different clinical outcomes, regardless of treatment time windows. Conventional imaging appears sufficient as a first-line tool for selecting basilar EVT patients in routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/esj/23969873251383315
Christian Boehme, Lukas Mayer-Suess, Thomas Toell, Anel Karisik, Kurt Mölgg, Silvia Felicetti, Benjamin Dejakum, Lucie Buergi, Lukas Scherer, Karin Willeit, Wilfried Lang, Johann Willeit, Peter Willeit, Michael Knoflach, Stefan Kiechl, Raimund Pechlaner
Introduction: Complications may secondarily impair functional outcome after stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). Here, we estimated the population-level impact of complications on long-term functional outcome to describe their combined impact and identify the most impactful complications.
Patients and methods: Patients admitted for acute ischemic stroke or TIA (ABCD2 score ⩾ 3) and discharged without severe disability were followed-up for occurence of 12 in-hospital and 26 post-discharge complications. Population-level impact of complications on the primary endpoint of non-excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) > 1) at end of follow-up 12 months after stroke was assessed by population attributable fraction (PAF). This cohort study was performed at a single European comprehensive stroke center and nested within a randomized controlled trial of intensified post-stroke care, STROKE-CARD.
Results: Among 1705 patients aged 69.4 ± 13.6 years (59.8% male), 36.8% (95% confidence interval: 34.5, 39.2) had non-excellent outcome at 12 months, 21.3% (19.4, 23.3) had unfavorable outcome (mRS > 2), and functional worsening occurred in-hospital in 2.6% (2.0, 3.6) and post-discharge in 20.3% (18.4, 22.3). Non-excellent 1-year functional outcome was predicted in-hospital by occurrence of recurrent stroke, neurological worsening, and infections (PAF: 0.6%-3.2%). Post-discharge, 12 complications significantly predicted outcome, and pain, severe fatigue, falls, and depression were most impactful (PAF: 5.4%-13.0%). Together, in-hospital complications accounted for 7.6% and post-discharge complications for 31.8% of non-excellent outcome, whereas acute therapy (thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy) and STROKE-CARD care accounted for 8.0% and 14.5% of excellent outcomes. In moderate and severe stroke (NIHSS > 5), acute therapy was the strongest predictor of excellent outcome (PAF: 29.1%). Results were consistent or stronger in patients with TIA, without prestroke disability, or in the regional catchment area, and when focusing on unfavorable outcome or worsening in mRS.
Discussion: Complications were responsible for more than one third of non-excellent 1-year functional outcome with pain, severe fatigue, depression, and falls most impactful. Complications rivaled the impact of acute therapy and determined functional outcome after TIA as well as after stroke.
Conclusion: Effective prevention and treatment of complications may substantially improve long-term functional outcomes after stroke and TIA.
{"title":"Effect of in-hospital and post-discharge complications on 1-year functional outcome after stroke and transient ischemic attack.","authors":"Christian Boehme, Lukas Mayer-Suess, Thomas Toell, Anel Karisik, Kurt Mölgg, Silvia Felicetti, Benjamin Dejakum, Lucie Buergi, Lukas Scherer, Karin Willeit, Wilfried Lang, Johann Willeit, Peter Willeit, Michael Knoflach, Stefan Kiechl, Raimund Pechlaner","doi":"10.1093/esj/23969873251383315","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/23969873251383315","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Complications may secondarily impair functional outcome after stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). Here, we estimated the population-level impact of complications on long-term functional outcome to describe their combined impact and identify the most impactful complications.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients admitted for acute ischemic stroke or TIA (ABCD2 score ⩾ 3) and discharged without severe disability were followed-up for occurence of 12 in-hospital and 26 post-discharge complications. Population-level impact of complications on the primary endpoint of non-excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) > 1) at end of follow-up 12 months after stroke was assessed by population attributable fraction (PAF). This cohort study was performed at a single European comprehensive stroke center and nested within a randomized controlled trial of intensified post-stroke care, STROKE-CARD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1705 patients aged 69.4 ± 13.6 years (59.8% male), 36.8% (95% confidence interval: 34.5, 39.2) had non-excellent outcome at 12 months, 21.3% (19.4, 23.3) had unfavorable outcome (mRS > 2), and functional worsening occurred in-hospital in 2.6% (2.0, 3.6) and post-discharge in 20.3% (18.4, 22.3). Non-excellent 1-year functional outcome was predicted in-hospital by occurrence of recurrent stroke, neurological worsening, and infections (PAF: 0.6%-3.2%). Post-discharge, 12 complications significantly predicted outcome, and pain, severe fatigue, falls, and depression were most impactful (PAF: 5.4%-13.0%). Together, in-hospital complications accounted for 7.6% and post-discharge complications for 31.8% of non-excellent outcome, whereas acute therapy (thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy) and STROKE-CARD care accounted for 8.0% and 14.5% of excellent outcomes. In moderate and severe stroke (NIHSS > 5), acute therapy was the strongest predictor of excellent outcome (PAF: 29.1%). Results were consistent or stronger in patients with TIA, without prestroke disability, or in the regional catchment area, and when focusing on unfavorable outcome or worsening in mRS.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Complications were responsible for more than one third of non-excellent 1-year functional outcome with pain, severe fatigue, depression, and falls most impactful. Complications rivaled the impact of acute therapy and determined functional outcome after TIA as well as after stroke.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Effective prevention and treatment of complications may substantially improve long-term functional outcomes after stroke and TIA.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alice de Vautibault, Adnan Mujanovic, Valentin Amar, Laurent Roten, Urs Fischer, Marialuisa Zedde, Rosario Pascarella, Michail Giannakakis, Vasilis Tentoulouris, Elias Auer, Bernhard Siepen, Marta Olive Gadea, Arsany Hakim, Christina Marti, Anna Boronylo, Morin Beyeler, Jean-Philippe Cottier, Grégoire Boulouis, Laurent Fauchier, Anne Bernard, Jérôme Roumy, Thomas Meinel, Marco Pasi
Introduction: Covert brain infarctions (CBIs) are associated with cardiovascular risk factors (cvRFs). We aimed to evaluate the presence and therapeutic implications of modifiable cvRFs in patients with incidentally discovered CBI on routine neuroimaging.
Patients and methods: The SILENT cohort (NCT05685069) is a prospective, multicentred European cohort recruiting patients with incidentally detected focal CBIs on routine MRI, without prior clinical stroke. Modifiable cvRFs and their control were assessed using applicable international guidelines during a dedicated outpatient visit, including a clinical examination and laboratory work-up. Associations between cvRF profiles and the number of CBIs were analysed using linear regression.
Results: We included 231 patients (mean age 65 years, n = 130 [56%] male) with a total of 445 CBI lesions. Most CBIs were of lacunar type (n = 226; 51%) and the most common location was the cerebellum (n = 220; 50%). One hundred and fifty (65%) patients had at least 1, 112 (49%) at least 2 and 56 (24%) at least 3 known modifiable cvRFs. Among hypertensive patients, 69 (53%) had uncontrolled hypertension; 22 (65%) of diabetics were insufficiently controlled and 74 (58%) patients with dyslipidaemia had poorly controlled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Therapeutic measures were made for 144 patients (62%), including antiplatelet initiation in 107 (46%) and a statin in 69 (30%). The number of cvRFs per patient was significantly associated with the number of CBIs, rate ratio 1.08 (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 1.04-1.13).
Conclusion: In patients with incidentally discovered CBI, we found a high burden of poorly controlled cvRFs. Our findings highlight the importance and yield of a dedicated clinical and laboratory assessment of cvRFs in patients with CBIs.
{"title":"Cardiovascular risk factor control in patients with covert brain infarcts in the prospective SILENT cohort study.","authors":"Alice de Vautibault, Adnan Mujanovic, Valentin Amar, Laurent Roten, Urs Fischer, Marialuisa Zedde, Rosario Pascarella, Michail Giannakakis, Vasilis Tentoulouris, Elias Auer, Bernhard Siepen, Marta Olive Gadea, Arsany Hakim, Christina Marti, Anna Boronylo, Morin Beyeler, Jean-Philippe Cottier, Grégoire Boulouis, Laurent Fauchier, Anne Bernard, Jérôme Roumy, Thomas Meinel, Marco Pasi","doi":"10.1093/esj/aakaf006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakaf006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Covert brain infarctions (CBIs) are associated with cardiovascular risk factors (cvRFs). We aimed to evaluate the presence and therapeutic implications of modifiable cvRFs in patients with incidentally discovered CBI on routine neuroimaging.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The SILENT cohort (NCT05685069) is a prospective, multicentred European cohort recruiting patients with incidentally detected focal CBIs on routine MRI, without prior clinical stroke. Modifiable cvRFs and their control were assessed using applicable international guidelines during a dedicated outpatient visit, including a clinical examination and laboratory work-up. Associations between cvRF profiles and the number of CBIs were analysed using linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 231 patients (mean age 65 years, n = 130 [56%] male) with a total of 445 CBI lesions. Most CBIs were of lacunar type (n = 226; 51%) and the most common location was the cerebellum (n = 220; 50%). One hundred and fifty (65%) patients had at least 1, 112 (49%) at least 2 and 56 (24%) at least 3 known modifiable cvRFs. Among hypertensive patients, 69 (53%) had uncontrolled hypertension; 22 (65%) of diabetics were insufficiently controlled and 74 (58%) patients with dyslipidaemia had poorly controlled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Therapeutic measures were made for 144 patients (62%), including antiplatelet initiation in 107 (46%) and a statin in 69 (30%). The number of cvRFs per patient was significantly associated with the number of CBIs, rate ratio 1.08 (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 1.04-1.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with incidentally discovered CBI, we found a high burden of poorly controlled cvRFs. Our findings highlight the importance and yield of a dedicated clinical and laboratory assessment of cvRFs in patients with CBIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/esj/23969873251381924
Michael Gaub, Rahim Abo Kasem, Ilko Maier, Ansaar Rai, Pascal Jabbour, Joon-Tae Kim, Brian Howard, Ali Alawieh, Stacey Quintero Wolfe, Robert M Starke, Marios-Nikos Psychogios, Amir Shaban, Nitin Goyal, Justin Dye, Ali Alaraj, Mohamad Ezzeldin, Shinichi Yoshimura, David Fiorella, Omar Tanweer, Daniele G Romano, Pedro Navia, Hugo Cuellar, Isabel Fragata, Adam Polifka, Joshua Osbun, Fazeel Siddiqui, Mark Moss, Kaustubh Limaye, Maxim Mokin, Charles Matouk, Min S Park, Waleed Brinjikji, Ergun Daglioglu, Richard Williamson, David J Altschul, Christopher S Ogilvy, Roberto Crosa, Michael R Levitt, Benjamin Gory, Alexandra Paul, Peter Kan, Walter Casagrande, Shakeel Chowdhry, Michael F Stiefel, Ramesh Grandhi, Alejandro Spiotta, Justin Mascitelli
Background: Recent trials have furthered uncertainty regarding the endovascular benefit for medium vessel occlusions (MeVO). Stent retrievers (SR) were employed in the first attempt in most interventional arm participants. We sought to compare outcomes in acute MCA M2 occlusions between frontline aspiration and SR, and to delineate procedural and anatomical covariates associated with differential treatment effect.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of a multicenter stroke thrombectomy cohort identified cases of MT for M2 occlusions. Unmatched and propensity score-matched (PSM) cohorts were generated comparing frontline aspiration to standalone and combined SR. The primary outcome was functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days. Recanalization, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), mortality, and the effect of M2 laterality, division occlusion and procedure time were assessed.
Results: About 1734 patients with M2 occlusions underwent either frontline aspiration (n = 711) or SR/combined (n = 958) thrombectomy between 2013 and 2024. PSM analysis favored aspiration for functional independence (49.9% vs 44.0%, OR 1.27 (1.03-1.57)), complete recanalization (61.2% vs 48.7%, OR 1.66 (1.34-2.05)), complete first pass effect (35.0% vs 27.6%, OR 1.42 (1.13-1.78)), and sICH (3.5% vs 6.2%, OR 0.55 (0.33-0.91)), with no difference in mortality. Frontline aspiration had significantly shorter procedural times (median 28 [IQR 15-49.5] vs 51 [IQR 35-78] minutes; p < 0.001). For every minute increase in procedure time, the probability of functional independence decreased significantly (p < 0.001) less with frontline aspiration (0.35%) compared to SR/combined (1.61%).
Conclusion: Frontline aspiration for M2 occlusions resulted in better clinical and angiographic outcomes compared to SRs. Future trials for MeVO with a focus on contact aspiration thrombectomy may succeed where recent trials have failed.
背景:最近的试验进一步证实了中度血管闭塞(MeVO)的血管内益处的不确定性。支架回收器(SR)在大多数介入组参与者的第一次尝试中使用。我们试图比较一线抽吸和SR治疗急性MCA M2闭塞的结果,并描述与不同治疗效果相关的程序和解剖协变量。方法:回顾性分析一个多中心卒中血栓切除术队列,确定了M2闭塞的MT病例。生成了不匹配和倾向评分匹配(PSM)队列,比较一线吸入与独立和联合sr。主要终点是90天的功能独立性(mRS 0-2)。评估再通、症状性颅内出血(sICH)、死亡率、M2侧位、分割闭塞和手术时间的影响。结果:2013年至2024年间,约1734例M2闭塞患者接受了一线抽吸(n = 711)或SR/联合取栓(n = 958)。PSM分析支持功能独立(49.9% vs 44.0%, OR 1.27(1.03-1.57))、完全再通(61.2% vs 48.7%, OR 1.66(1.34-2.05))、完全首通效应(35.0% vs 27.6%, OR 1.42(1.13-1.78))和sICH (3.5% vs 6.2%, OR 0.55(0.33-0.91)),死亡率无差异。一线抽吸术的手术时间明显缩短(中位28 [IQR 15-49.5] vs . 51 [IQR 35-78]分钟);p结论:与SRs相比,一线抽吸术治疗M2闭塞的临床和血管造影结果更好。在近期试验失败的地方,MeVO的未来试验可能会成功,重点是接触吸入性取栓。
{"title":"Frontline aspiration versus stent retriever thrombectomy for M2 occlusions: Insights from the STAR registry.","authors":"Michael Gaub, Rahim Abo Kasem, Ilko Maier, Ansaar Rai, Pascal Jabbour, Joon-Tae Kim, Brian Howard, Ali Alawieh, Stacey Quintero Wolfe, Robert M Starke, Marios-Nikos Psychogios, Amir Shaban, Nitin Goyal, Justin Dye, Ali Alaraj, Mohamad Ezzeldin, Shinichi Yoshimura, David Fiorella, Omar Tanweer, Daniele G Romano, Pedro Navia, Hugo Cuellar, Isabel Fragata, Adam Polifka, Joshua Osbun, Fazeel Siddiqui, Mark Moss, Kaustubh Limaye, Maxim Mokin, Charles Matouk, Min S Park, Waleed Brinjikji, Ergun Daglioglu, Richard Williamson, David J Altschul, Christopher S Ogilvy, Roberto Crosa, Michael R Levitt, Benjamin Gory, Alexandra Paul, Peter Kan, Walter Casagrande, Shakeel Chowdhry, Michael F Stiefel, Ramesh Grandhi, Alejandro Spiotta, Justin Mascitelli","doi":"10.1093/esj/23969873251381924","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/23969873251381924","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent trials have furthered uncertainty regarding the endovascular benefit for medium vessel occlusions (MeVO). Stent retrievers (SR) were employed in the first attempt in most interventional arm participants. We sought to compare outcomes in acute MCA M2 occlusions between frontline aspiration and SR, and to delineate procedural and anatomical covariates associated with differential treatment effect.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of a multicenter stroke thrombectomy cohort identified cases of MT for M2 occlusions. Unmatched and propensity score-matched (PSM) cohorts were generated comparing frontline aspiration to standalone and combined SR. The primary outcome was functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days. Recanalization, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), mortality, and the effect of M2 laterality, division occlusion and procedure time were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 1734 patients with M2 occlusions underwent either frontline aspiration (n = 711) or SR/combined (n = 958) thrombectomy between 2013 and 2024. PSM analysis favored aspiration for functional independence (49.9% vs 44.0%, OR 1.27 (1.03-1.57)), complete recanalization (61.2% vs 48.7%, OR 1.66 (1.34-2.05)), complete first pass effect (35.0% vs 27.6%, OR 1.42 (1.13-1.78)), and sICH (3.5% vs 6.2%, OR 0.55 (0.33-0.91)), with no difference in mortality. Frontline aspiration had significantly shorter procedural times (median 28 [IQR 15-49.5] vs 51 [IQR 35-78] minutes; p < 0.001). For every minute increase in procedure time, the probability of functional independence decreased significantly (p < 0.001) less with frontline aspiration (0.35%) compared to SR/combined (1.61%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frontline aspiration for M2 occlusions resulted in better clinical and angiographic outcomes compared to SRs. Future trials for MeVO with a focus on contact aspiration thrombectomy may succeed where recent trials have failed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/esj/23969873251371001
William K Diprose, Catherine Veilleux, Mohammed Almekhlafi, Alec Beresford, Kaustubha Ghate, Davina McAllister, Michael T M Wang, Jessica Wiles, Douglas Campbell, P Alan Barber
Introduction: Non-invasive convective head cooling is a promising putative neuroprotective therapy for ischemic stroke patients as it may portably, non-invasively, and selectively cool the ischemic penumbra. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of utilizing non-invasive convective head cooling in ischemic stroke patients before and during endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).
Patients and methods: We conducted a multi-center, prospective, non-randomized, open-label trial at two comprehensive stroke centers in ischemic stroke patients where EVT was planned. Patients were assessed for eligibility in the emergency department (ED) and had a cooling cap fitted that circulated coolant between -5°C and 0°C until EVT completion. The primary feasibility endpoint was adherence, defined as tolerating cooling for ⩾50% of the time from cooling cap application until EVT completion.
Results: Between July and November 2024, 40 EVT patients (19 (47.5%) female, mean ± SD age 71.6 ± 12.6 years) underwent a median (IQR) duration of convective head cooling of 86 (58-106) min. Thirty-nine (97.5%) participants met the primary feasibility endpoint. The enrollment rate was five participants per site per month. Median (IQR) time from comprehensive stroke center arrival to cooling start was 10 (5-51) min. Thirty-two (80%) patients received general anesthesia. eTICI 2b-3 reperfusion was achieved in 38 (95.0%) participants. Median (IQR) 24-h infarct volume was 14.3 (5.5-29.1) mL. Median (IQR) 3-month modified Rankin Scale score was 2 (1-5). Three-month mortality occurred in 8/38 (21.1%) participants. Nine serious adverse events occurred in 8 (20.0%) participants, none of which were attributed to head cooling.
Conclusions: Convective head cooling is feasible in patients undergoing EVT and warrants further investigation in larger randomized controlled trials.
{"title":"Non-invasive convective head cooling during stroke thrombectomy: A prospective multi-center feasibility trial.","authors":"William K Diprose, Catherine Veilleux, Mohammed Almekhlafi, Alec Beresford, Kaustubha Ghate, Davina McAllister, Michael T M Wang, Jessica Wiles, Douglas Campbell, P Alan Barber","doi":"10.1093/esj/23969873251371001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/23969873251371001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-invasive convective head cooling is a promising putative neuroprotective therapy for ischemic stroke patients as it may portably, non-invasively, and selectively cool the ischemic penumbra. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of utilizing non-invasive convective head cooling in ischemic stroke patients before and during endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a multi-center, prospective, non-randomized, open-label trial at two comprehensive stroke centers in ischemic stroke patients where EVT was planned. Patients were assessed for eligibility in the emergency department (ED) and had a cooling cap fitted that circulated coolant between -5°C and 0°C until EVT completion. The primary feasibility endpoint was adherence, defined as tolerating cooling for ⩾50% of the time from cooling cap application until EVT completion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between July and November 2024, 40 EVT patients (19 (47.5%) female, mean ± SD age 71.6 ± 12.6 years) underwent a median (IQR) duration of convective head cooling of 86 (58-106) min. Thirty-nine (97.5%) participants met the primary feasibility endpoint. The enrollment rate was five participants per site per month. Median (IQR) time from comprehensive stroke center arrival to cooling start was 10 (5-51) min. Thirty-two (80%) patients received general anesthesia. eTICI 2b-3 reperfusion was achieved in 38 (95.0%) participants. Median (IQR) 24-h infarct volume was 14.3 (5.5-29.1) mL. Median (IQR) 3-month modified Rankin Scale score was 2 (1-5). Three-month mortality occurred in 8/38 (21.1%) participants. Nine serious adverse events occurred in 8 (20.0%) participants, none of which were attributed to head cooling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Convective head cooling is feasible in patients undergoing EVT and warrants further investigation in larger randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/esj/23969873251352406
Mohamed F Doheim, Robrecht R M M Knapen, Diederik W J Dippel, Julie Staals, Jeannette Hofmeijer, Adriaan C G M van Es, Jonathan M Coutinho, Christiaan van der Leij, Raul G Nogueira, Robert J van Oostenbrugge, Wim H van Zwam
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent trials did not demonstrate the benefit of endovascular therapy (EVT) for distal or medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs), raising questions about factors influencing outcomes. Anesthesia choice may play a role, yet its impact remains unclear. This study assessed general anesthesia (GA) versus non-GA in EVT for DMVOs, evaluating procedural, functional, and safety outcomes.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients undergoing EVT for AIS due to anterior DMVOs in the middle cerebral artery (MCA-M2, M3, M4) and anterior cerebral artery (ACA-A1, A2, A3) from the MR CLEAN registry between March 2014 and December 2018 were included. They were stratified into GA and non-GA groups, with propensity score matching employed to adjust for differences in baseline risk. Primary outcomes included functional outcomes at 90 days, assessed by ordinal regression analysis of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 90 days, and recanalization rates measured by Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) scores. Secondary outcomes included dichotomized mRS scores, death at 90 days, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). A systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant DMVO studies with a random effects model was performed. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024607294).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 5193 patients in the registry, 657 were eligible for our study, with 506 in the non-GA group, and 151 in the GA group. The median age was 73 years (IQR 64-81) in the non-GA group and 73 years (IQR 61-80) in the GA group (p = 0.35). The proportion of male patients was 50.2% in the non-GA group and 57.0% in the GA group (p = 0.15). In the matched cohort (n = 170), recanalization rates were higher in the GA group compared to the non-GA group (excellent recanalization rates (TICI2c/3): 61.0% vs 32.1%; OR 3.31, 95% CI (1.74-6.29), p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the overall distribution of functional outcomes at 90 days (common OR 0.93, 95% CI (0.54-1.56), p = 0.77). Mortality was comparable between groups (34.1% vs 31.8%; OR 1.11, 95% CI (0.59-2.11), p = 0.74), and there was no significant difference in sICH (12.9% vs 5.9%; OR 0.42, 95% CI (0.14-1.27), p = 0.12). The systematic review and meta-analysis included six studies with a total of 3521 patients. The pooled analysis indicated that GA was associated with significantly lower rates of excellent functional outcomes (mRS 0-1: OR 0.74, 95% CI (0.58-0.94), p = 0.01) and higher mortality (OR 1.36, 95% CI (1.07-1.74), p = 0.01) compared to the non-GA at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>In the MR CLEAN Registry, GA was associated with higher recanalization rates during EVT, but this technical advantage did not translate into improved 90-day functional outcomes. Our meta-analysis further indicated that non-GA strategies were associated with better functional recovery and lower mortality. These associations, however,
{"title":"Association of anesthesia strategies with outcomes in endovascular treatment for distal and medium vessel occlusions: A propensity score-matched analysis of the MR CLEAN registry and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mohamed F Doheim, Robrecht R M M Knapen, Diederik W J Dippel, Julie Staals, Jeannette Hofmeijer, Adriaan C G M van Es, Jonathan M Coutinho, Christiaan van der Leij, Raul G Nogueira, Robert J van Oostenbrugge, Wim H van Zwam","doi":"10.1093/esj/23969873251352406","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/23969873251352406","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent trials did not demonstrate the benefit of endovascular therapy (EVT) for distal or medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs), raising questions about factors influencing outcomes. Anesthesia choice may play a role, yet its impact remains unclear. This study assessed general anesthesia (GA) versus non-GA in EVT for DMVOs, evaluating procedural, functional, and safety outcomes.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients undergoing EVT for AIS due to anterior DMVOs in the middle cerebral artery (MCA-M2, M3, M4) and anterior cerebral artery (ACA-A1, A2, A3) from the MR CLEAN registry between March 2014 and December 2018 were included. They were stratified into GA and non-GA groups, with propensity score matching employed to adjust for differences in baseline risk. Primary outcomes included functional outcomes at 90 days, assessed by ordinal regression analysis of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 90 days, and recanalization rates measured by Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) scores. Secondary outcomes included dichotomized mRS scores, death at 90 days, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). A systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant DMVO studies with a random effects model was performed. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024607294).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 5193 patients in the registry, 657 were eligible for our study, with 506 in the non-GA group, and 151 in the GA group. The median age was 73 years (IQR 64-81) in the non-GA group and 73 years (IQR 61-80) in the GA group (p = 0.35). The proportion of male patients was 50.2% in the non-GA group and 57.0% in the GA group (p = 0.15). In the matched cohort (n = 170), recanalization rates were higher in the GA group compared to the non-GA group (excellent recanalization rates (TICI2c/3): 61.0% vs 32.1%; OR 3.31, 95% CI (1.74-6.29), p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the overall distribution of functional outcomes at 90 days (common OR 0.93, 95% CI (0.54-1.56), p = 0.77). Mortality was comparable between groups (34.1% vs 31.8%; OR 1.11, 95% CI (0.59-2.11), p = 0.74), and there was no significant difference in sICH (12.9% vs 5.9%; OR 0.42, 95% CI (0.14-1.27), p = 0.12). The systematic review and meta-analysis included six studies with a total of 3521 patients. The pooled analysis indicated that GA was associated with significantly lower rates of excellent functional outcomes (mRS 0-1: OR 0.74, 95% CI (0.58-0.94), p = 0.01) and higher mortality (OR 1.36, 95% CI (1.07-1.74), p = 0.01) compared to the non-GA at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>In the MR CLEAN Registry, GA was associated with higher recanalization rates during EVT, but this technical advantage did not translate into improved 90-day functional outcomes. Our meta-analysis further indicated that non-GA strategies were associated with better functional recovery and lower mortality. These associations, however,","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146086905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}